Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Political Purging: U.S. Attorneys Replaced with Bush Loyalists

By Marjorie Cohn, AlterNet. Posted March 12, 2007.


In the Bush administration, justice has become politicized. Gonzales has used provisions in the Patriot Act to replace U.S. Attorneys with Bush loyalists.

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

Also in Top Stories

Sleeping Around Craigslist
Anna Reed, Lily Penza, East Bay Express

Bush's Secret Army of Snoops and Snitches
Matthew Rothschild, The Progressive

Michael Pollan on What's Wrong with Environmentalism
Kate Cheney Davidson, Yale Environment 360

A Peak Oil Prophet Imagines Life in America After Wal-Mart
Michelle Nijhuis, Grist.org

Sci-Fi Heroes Take on the System
Roya Rastegar, ColorLines

Billionaires Are Gouging Your Grandparents
Brave New Films, Brave New Films

Online Activists Keep the Pressure on Obama
Ari Melber, TheNation.com

More stories by Marjorie Cohn

Get AlterNet in
your mailbox!

 
Advertisement

Last year, Republican Senator Arlen Specter slipped a clause into the reauthorized USA Patriot Act that allows Attorney General Alberto Gonzales to appoint U.S. Attorneys without Senate confirmation. Gonzales took advantage of that crafty little provision to fire eight U.S. Attorneys who weren't goose-stepping to the Bush agenda and replace them with Bush loyalists.

Denying any impropriety, Gonzales dismissed the significance of the mass ouster (seven federal prosecutors were asked to resign on the same day last December), calling it an "overblown personnel matter." The Attorney General swore to the Senate Judiciary Committee in January that he "would never, ever make a change in a United States attorney for political reasons." But the evidence belies Gonzales' protestations.

Why did these prosecutors run afoul of the Bush gang? David Iglesias from Albuquerque received an evaluation that said he was "respected by the judiciary, agencies and staff." But he didn't file a corruption case involving New Mexico Democrats before the 2006 election which would've embarrassed the Democrats.

New Mexico Republican Senator Pete Domenici called Iglesias and asked whether charges were "going to be filed before the election." Iglesias said he felt "sick" after Domenici called him. "I felt leaned on, I felt pressured to get these matters moving." Iglesias also received a call from Republican Representative Heather Wilson, who was running neck-in-neck with a Democrat in a race where the corruption investigation was a campaign issue.

Justice Department spokesman Brian Roehrkasse admitted Domenici's complaint to Gonzales about Iglesias was a factor in the prosecutor's removal. Carol Lam, "an effective manager and respected leader" from San Diego, conducted an investigation of Republican Representative Randy "Duke" Cunningham for taking over $2 million in bribes from defense contractors. It resulted in a guilty plea and an eight-plus year sentence. In February, Lam indicted Kyle Dustin Foggo, formerly the number 3 man at the CIA. If Lam were permitted to continue, she might have uncovered more official wrongdoing in defense-contracting. Lam was replaced by a member of the Federalist Society with almost no criminal law experience.

Bud Cummins, a "very competent and highly regarded" U.S. Attorney from Little Rock, Arkansas, was removed and replaced with J. Timothy Griffin, one of Karl Rove's key researchers. Deputy Attorney General Paul McNulty testified that Cummins had done nothing wrong to justify his removal. "I'm not aware of anything negative," he said. Cummins said a senior Justice Department official warned him that the fired U.S. Attorneys should keep quiet about "their" firings.

Daniel Bogden, a "highly regarded" and "capable leader" from Las Vegas, had opened an investigation into allegations that Nevada's Republican governor had accepted inappropriate gifts. Paul Charlton, from Phoenix was "well respected" for his "integrity, professionalism and competence." He had undertaken an investigation of two Republican Arizona Representatives. John McKay, "an effective, well-regarded and capable leader" from Seattle was called by a well-placed Republican, who inquired about whether McKay intended to convene a grand jury to examine claims of voter fraud in a close gubernatorial election, which was won by a Democrat. McKay also favored a computerized law enforcement information-sharing system that the Justice Department opposed.

These prosecutors were punished for doing their jobs too well. In the Bush administration, justice has become politicized. Democrats have been investigated by the Department of Justice seven times more frequently than Republicans. On the defensive as a result of the U.S. Attorney firing scandal, the administration has engaged in damage control. It has agreed not to oppose legislation overriding the Specter Patriot Act loophole.

Another Patriot Act provision that has been misused by the Gonzales Justice Department authorizes the use of "national security letters." These are administrative subpoenas that enable the FBI to obtain our e-mails and telephone records, and travel and financial information without approval from a judge. An audit by the Inspector General concluded last week that the FBI has used this provision to illegally force businesses to turn over customer data, then lied to Congress about it.

The Bush gang has engaged in a pattern and practice of misconduct, including a war of aggression, torture and war crimes, and spying on Americans without warrants. Congress has begun to hold hearings and conduct investigations. As increasing evidence of high crimes and misdemeanors emerges, it is high time for the House of Representatives to undertake its constitutional duty to initiate impeachment proceedings.

Digg!

See more stories tagged with: gonzales, patriot act, us attorneys

Marjorie Cohn is a professor at Thomas Jefferson School of Law, president-elect of the National Lawyers Guild, and the US representative to the executive committee of the American Association of Jurists. Her new book, Cowboy Republic: Six Ways the Bush Gang Has Defied the Law, will be published in July.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
We passed "high time" about four years ago!
Posted by: Ian MacLeod on Mar 12, 2007 1:29 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The Neocons have left a paper trail a blind third-grader could follow for plans and intent, a crowd of abused and misused potential witnesses that would fill the Rose Bowl to overflowing, and classified papers enough to fill the Library of Congress, any set of which would get them impeached if they were ever pried loose. It has become clear that "classification for reasons of National Security" means it's something that would get a Neocon in trouble if it came to light. Now the only question is this horse race: Will they nail the Big Dick before he runs out of Federal Prosecutors to fire or Jr. Federalist Society Cub Scouts to replace them with? Will they start reactivating WWII vets out of nursing homes? Will they use the National Guard to remove and guard what little gold may be left in Fort Knox (only one little show room's worth at this point, probably) on it's way to Swizerland or South Africa? Will they all disappear into the wilds of South America, classified papers, gold, National Guard and all?

Except for what's left of our poor, misused and abused soldiers, one can only hope...

Ian

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Who actually wrote the Specter clause?
Posted by: eddie torres on Mar 12, 2007 1:35 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
He's behaving awfully bi-partisan these days. Was it written for him by a Rove/Cheney cut-out?

Republican politicians seem to cooperate only when caught red-handed - usually to minimize the damage to peers and higher-ups. A falling-on-you-own-sword ploy.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Gonzo deserves to hang...
Posted by: apeshow on Mar 12, 2007 1:51 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
For his treason to this country.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Gonzo deserves to hang... Posted by: sheena2u
Does it ever end??
Posted by: icj on Mar 12, 2007 1:53 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
How much corruption and scandal can one country take? I mean, my God, we impeached a president for getting a blow job but this president lies, tortures, destroys the Constitution, invades the legal system, demolishes "checks and balances" and yet all we can do is say "that's politics"??? WTF?!?! (Sorry, I just have to let that out every once in awhile!).

I can't comment on any of the rest of them, but I lived in Washington State when Christine Gregoire won by the slimmest of margins and there was no voter fraud. They held three separate recounts and she won, by a small margin, but won fair and square nonetheless. The rabid right-wing in Washington State used the charge of "voter fraud" in a last ditch effort to unseat Gregoire, but, thanks to smart, able US Attorneys like McKay, they didn't succeed. I mean, how many freakin' recounts does one need???

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Like his boss, Gonzales was never qualified
Posted by: dayahka on Mar 12, 2007 3:38 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There are no limits, no rules, no principles of any kind binding the actions of the Bush regime. Gonzales was never qualified to be AG, but there he is. Arlen Specter should never have given any AG the power to fire and hire at will, but Arlen did. Bush should never have been given the free passes with the Patriot Act, Iraq war, Homeland Insecurity that he wanted, but he was. There are no limits. Congress is a pack of totally corrupt jackals, wholly bought and paid for by "special interests" (those with money). I can't think of a single moral, ethical, political, theological, or logical principle that would cause this gang to back off doing whatever they want, can you?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Support Sen. Tester
Posted by: Slmncty on Mar 12, 2007 8:46 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
View the definition of terror, terrorist, terrorism and note its use from early time, to now and beyond. Our own civil war could be called terrorism. The war on terror is more about executive power grab. Sen. Tester advocates the complete repeal of the patriot act. I for one agree and support his position as others should.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Here we go again!
Posted by: andrushka on Mar 13, 2007 5:37 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Here we go again, another totally incompetent member of the "glorious" Bush administration. It's the whole government that has to be immediately impeached and SOONER THE BETTER, before untold damage has been done, and it becomes too late to save the country!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Bush & Co. are war criminals Posted by: sheena2u
» RE: Here we go again! Posted by: bobscott
Not just the Travel Office
Posted by: albrechtkrausse on Mar 13, 2007 7:40 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
but Clinton purged them all when they seized power. This shows how both parties are one-in-the-same when it comes down to it. To Wit:
ATTORNEY GENERAL SEEKS RESIGNATIONS FROM PROSECUTORS


*Please Note: Archive articles do not include photos, charts or graphics. More information. March 24, 1993, Wednesday
By DAVID JOHNSTON, (Special to The New York Times); National Desk
Late Edition - Final, Section A, Page 1, Column 1, 1053 words
DISPLAYING ABSTRACT - Attorney General Janet Reno today demanded the prompt resignation of all United States Attorneys, leading the Federal prosecutor in the District of Columbia to suggest that the order could be tied to his long-running investigation of Representative Dan Rostenkowski, a crucial ally of President Clinton. Jay B. Stephens

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Repugs have a plan...
Posted by: bob t on Mar 13, 2007 10:45 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...for controlling america and americans. They are accomplishing their plan for 'we the sheeple' very, very well. This controlling of the courts is just part of that plan. We all saw what the SCOTUS did when they gave the election to Bush. Once 'we the sheeple' wake up to that plan we can take countermeasures. Does one call that a conspiracy, your damn right one does. If it stinks like a conspiracy it damn well is a conspiracy. Don't be averred by the 'their go the conspiracy theorists again, crazy as usual' argument prevail.
Three groups caused this war on America, don't just blame one group. Well if you really want to blame one group blame the Republican Party. But you have to go deeper to understand the dynamics. It's the three entities behind the Republican Party and which give republicans there power.
The three pillars of republican power are:
1. Big Religion, the Catholics(my religion) and the white southern confederate states evangelical Fundamentalist Baptists.
2. Big Neocons
3. Big Corporatocracy: oil, Halliburton, you know the usual
Stop these groups and you will save American democracy.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: epugs have a plan... Posted by: Krain61
everything abou the Gonzales/USattorney-gate faux scandal is pure B.S.
Posted by: rightisright on Mar 14, 2007 12:28 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
notice how none of the articles on Alternet, the New Left Times, and other leftist media outlets mention of the fact that Clinton fired ALL of the US Attorneys when he took office - not some: ALL - and it was for 100% purely political purposes, after 12 years of Reagan and Bush Sr. - this "USattorney-gate" faux scandal is being whipped up by a cynical and overtly leftist media, and will only grow in the coming days because that's all these jackals know how to do anymore - just remember 2 simple things: (1) Clinton did it too (on a much larger scale), and (2) the President (any President: Clinton, Bush, anyone) is ALLOWED to boot a US Attorney, for any reason or for no reason - the left makes me sick

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

look at the shit they have in the patriot act
Posted by: Krain61 on Mar 14, 2007 4:58 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
USA PATRIOT Act (H.R. 3162)
If it doesn't work just type it in.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

bassrat
Posted by: bassrat on Mar 17, 2007 3:26 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Someone said something to the effect, Where the people lead, the leaders will follow. When We The People Lead and show direction, I believe our branches of Government will in fact follow. As much as we hear that 70% of the citizens are not for going forwade in this quagmire, without the suppoort of the representives AND the senators, all we will do is waste paper and air on getting us out. We need to let Con-gress KNOW how we feel, and they need to abide to our wants, not theirs. Call, Write, E-Mail them. or we must go on.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]