Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
100 words for 100 days: submit your 100 word essay and get published on AlterNet
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Is U.S. Global Warming Pollution Violating Human Rights Law?

By Megan Tady, The NewStandard. Posted March 5, 2007.


As the ice they depend on for their way of life melts away around them, indigenous people of the Arctic are taking a crack at Washington in international court.

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

More stories by Megan Tady

Get AlterNet in
your mailbox!

 
Advertisement

While the rest of the world debated global warming, Roy Nageak watched the ice melt and recede in his Arctic backyard. Nageak, an Inuit, lives in the northernmost settlement in Alaska. Growing up, he recalls that there was "always ice."

"There were great pads of ice that were solid and many feet thick," Nageak said.

But Nageak and other Inuit, who live a world away from burning smokestacks and traffic jams are among the first victims of global warming. And human rights groups say the Inuit case mirrors the plight of other populations around the globe who are expected to face the ramifications of climate change sooner, and more harshly, than the countries most responsible for the gases linked to global warming.

"Now, we are lucky to get four feet of ice because of what is happening outside our region," Nageak said. "It's a lifestyle that is prevalent in another society that is so far away from us, and it's affecting our way of life."

A 2004 Arctic Climate Impact Assessment by international scientists found that "climate changes are being experienced particularly intensely in the Arctic" and that the "Inuit face major threats to their food security and hunting cultures."

Nageak joined 62 other Inuit in Alaska and Canada in 2005 to hold the world's most-notorious polluter accountable. They filed a petition against the United States with the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights -- one of the bodies set up to promote and protect human rights in the Americas.

The petition argues that the impacts of climate change caused by the U.S. violate the human rights of the Inuit. The Inuit say their livelihoods, their spiritual life and their cultural identity are threatened because of the greenhouse-gas emissions of the United States and the government's failure to curb the damage. "We offer our testimony as a warning to humanity that while global warming has hit Arctic peoples first, changes are coming for everyone."

Last week, the Commission held a one-hour hearing to investigate the relationship between human rights and climate change in North and South America.

In a letter to the Commission, Sheila Watt-Cloutier, former director of the Inuit Circumpolar Council leading the Inuit charge, listed many of the ways climate change has jeopardized the Inuit way of life: "Because of the loss of ice and snow, communities have become isolated from one another; hunting, travel and other subsistence activities have become more dangerous or impossible; drinking-water sources have been jeopardized; [and] many coastal communities are already threatened or being forced to relocate."

In a statement to the press, Watt-Cloutier said, "We offer our testimony as a warning to humanity that, while global warming has hit Arctic peoples first, changes are coming for everyone."

Although the Inuit are the first indigenous population to make such a formal claim, human-rights activists say that as the impacts of climate change increase, so too will its toll on human life. And with it, they warn, will come populations seeking redress from the world's big polluters. "As the causal link becomes clearer ... between climate change and specific injuries, we're going to see people that are injured looking for justice somewhere."

"I don't think there's any doubt we'll see more of this," said David Hunter, a senior advisor of the Center for International Environmental Law (CIEL). "As the causal link becomes clearer... between climate change and specific injuries, we're going to see people that are injured looking for justice somewhere." CIEL, along with the law firm Earthjustice, worked with the Inuit to submit the petition.

Inequities

Growing up in the Arctic, Roy Nageak's father taught him how to fish and hunt on the ice. Nageak always expected to do the same for his son, but climate change has made the ice thinner and less predictable, and the animals and fish they hunt more elusive.

"Now I have a son who is 18 years old ... and I need to let him learn how to be in harmony with nature," Nageak said. "But without the ice, the knowledge that was passed on to me from my father ... it's not there."

Nageak said that he is frustrated that he "has no control" over how the rest of the world, particularly the U.S. government, chooses to operate. Washington has refused to join international commitments to address climate change, and it has offered only modest attempts to curb greenhouse-gas emissions while making plans for more coal-burning power plants, a major source of carbon dioxide.


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: global warming, climate change, inuit

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Get Perspective
Posted by: dwegowy on Mar 5, 2007 9:54 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This highlights a critical error I notice, even with some environmentalists, when debating the now-decades-old issue of Global Warming: it is becoming extremely unimportant IF man's activity is causing or even just promoting the planet's warming. The fact is that the planet IS warming, and if I lived in the North where my very life was being fundamentally changed, I would be rather provoked by any talk that downplayed the need for a change in human activity.

Even those same environmentalists I know tend to own and rely on a motorized vehicle (I don't), and don't seem to have a contingency plan in the event gas runs out before breathable air does... or whatever global crisis you prefer, begins to play out. The flipside is that legal battles over environmental issues are akin to Iggy Pop's 'dancing about art': an ultimately unrelated action to a desired effect.

The root global crisis, though, is apathy coupled with insularity.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Which global warming?
Posted by: filmconsultant on Mar 5, 2007 1:06 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Are you talking about ultra conservative global warming? That to limit it is bad for business. Besides it's only pseudo science. Worse, global warming is liberal rehetoric. And the past cold winter is proof it's only a myth. If Bush and Cheney can stonewall global warming, their special interest buddies will continue to reap benefits.

Or do you mean global warming that has reduced polar icebergs by over a mile in the past decade? Or that there is now revealed an ocean full of new species of wildlife hidden until the ice pack melted? Or the increasingly erratic weather? An imminent disaster we find so disturbing?

Pseudo science or imminent disaster, nature ignores the foibles of mankind. But if it is imminent disaster and we continue our present behavior, then the only question will be whether Kansas is a Sahara or an arctic.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]