Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Is Big Oil Going to Control Iraq’s Reserves?

By Christian Parenti, The Nation. Posted March 6, 2007.


War and corruption have crippled Iraq's ability to export oil. But that's not stopping Big Oil's efforts to control and profit from what's left.
Advertisement

Iraq's postwar oil bonanza remains a mirage. The country has the second- or third-largest reserves in the world, making petroleum the heart and vast bulk of its economy. Thus in March 2003 did Paul Wolfowitz assure Congress that Iraq would "finance its own reconstruction, and relatively soon." American planners predicted that Iraq's oil production would triple to a feverish 6 million barrels per day by 2010.

Instead war, corruption, sectarian slaughter and a massive crime wave have reduced the country's once mighty petroleum sector to an industrial zombie: still ambulatory, functional but essentially dead.

Despite this, oil majors and the International Monetary Fund have been pressuring Iraq to pass a thoroughly free-market hydrocarbons law that would allow foreign companies to make huge profits from Iraq's petroleum. A draft of the law has just been released; the Iraqi Cabinet has approved it and sent it on to Iraq's Parliament for debate and approval in March.

But is Big Oil really poised for total victory in Iraq? Such an outcome is hard to imagine, at least in the near term, given the likelihood of opposition from Iraqis and, more important, the spiraling chaos: Iraq is a society in meltdown with no real state to speak of. Many politicians have fled Iraq, rarely risking trips back to Baghdad, so even achieving a basic parliamentary quorum can be difficult. Controlling and profiting from Iraq's oil has been the goal of the oil majors, but they do not write history unmolested by the momentum of events and competing agendas.

Nor does the proposed oil law simply serve Iraq up on a plate to the oil giants. One London-based oil analyst who expected a more decentralized and free-market law called it "bloody confused." On key questions of foreign investment and regional decentralization versus centralized control, the law is vague but not all bad. In general terms it reaffirms state control over oil and binds Iraq's Sunni center and Shiite south to the Kurdish north by re-creating a single Iraqi National Oil Company, which will in turn dole out oil income to the regions on a per-capita basis. This might help de-escalate sectarian conflict.

But the law leaves plenty of problematic wiggle room: All its important details are left for later resolution by a new Federal Oil and Gas Council to be controlled by the prime minister, which will effectively bypass Parliament. And while the law asserts a set of generally nationalist economic goals, it sets no minimum level for state participation, nor does it cap the amount of profits allowed to foreign firms.

Among the Iraqi political class there is pervasive confusion about the new law, but there is also a deep resource nationalism that opposes selling off the country's patrimony. My interviews with Iraqi oil experts, politicians and regular people revealed a quite reasonable and balanced view of the situation: Most felt that foreign participation in the oil sector could be helpful in reviving an industry battered by a fifteen-year nightmare of war, sanctions, more war and now anarchy. But no one felt Iraq should have to enslave itself to the will of Shell, BP or ExxonMobil.

If an aggressively liberalizing and decentralizing interpretation of the oil law is eventually pursued, it is not at all clear that it will, in fact, shape the future (if there is one) of Iraq's petroleum sector. "If an unfair oil law is passed, it will be a bone of contention for years to come," says Kamil Mahdi, an Iraqi academic now at the University of Exeter in Britain. "It will be remembered as something forced through during the worst period of violence. It will sow the seeds of instability throughout the whole region."

So what will the new oil law actually stipulate? Will it be passed into law and accepted by the people? And what are the real conditions and potential of the Iraq oil industry?

"The situation is pretty dire and going to get worse before it gets better," says oil analyst George Orwel, of Energy Intelligence. Orwel follows the Iraq oil industry from New York, working the phones to reach contacts that range from ministers in Baghdad to oil terminal engineers in Basra. He and other analysts paint a horrifically bleak picture.

Before the 1991 Gulf War the country's oil sector produced as much as 3.5 million barrels per day. But after four years of occupation, Iraq has only recently and momentarily managed to reach an output of 2.1 million barrels per day. And it can rarely manage to export more than 1.5 million barrels per day. Iraq's current oil production is concentrated in the north and the south. But since the US-led invasion, production in the northern fields has been almost totally off-line because of constant sabotage: 400 major attacks have been recorded on the pipelines that connect the Kirkuk fields to the Baiji refinery and both of those to the Turkish port of Ceyhan. Last year attacks on oil installations and employees killed 289 people and wounded 179.

The Oil Ministry--controlled by the Shiite government--is mired in corruption. Shoddy record keeping, limited accountability, little investment and endemic brain drain set the tone. Many of Iraq's petroleum engineers and geologists have escaped. "Most of those guys are either hiding in Sunni cities, driving cabs or they have fled abroad because they were listed on death-squad death sheets," said chief engineer Abdullah of Saladin Province.


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: corruption, oil, iraq

Christian Parenti is the author of "The Freedom: Shadows and Hallucinations in Occupied Iraq" (New Press) and a visiting fellow at CUNY's Center for Place, Culture and Politics.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
When Oil Wealth Is Poverty
Posted by: edith on Mar 6, 2007 1:04 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"The situation is pretty dire and going to get worse before it gets better," says oil analyst George Orwel, of Energy Intelligence."

Iraq even has its own Orwellian prophet of disaster. Talk about Biblical prophecy!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Your Damn Right
Posted by: bob t on Mar 6, 2007 5:58 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Big oil is going to steal Iraqs oil wealth if Big american,british and dutch oil campanies and George Bush, Dick Cheney and Condi Rice, the Chevron Oil princess have their say about it. The entire Bush Family and Bush are totaly dedicated to taking control of all ME oil. Also their supporters are equally dedicated to that same end. That includes Big Corporatocracy, Big Neocons and Big Religions(Catholicism and evangelical fundies).

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» So how's that workin' out? Posted by: SteveB
» So you agree with me... Posted by: SteveB
As long as there is infighting on alt renewables and no real effort to stop Big Oil,
Posted by: maxpayne on Mar 6, 2007 7:11 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
then the answer to the question is a big YES sadly. Unfortunately, it is already happening and this article is nothing new. Also, Alternet and the liberal blogosphere should STOP giving front page stories to articles that BADMOUTH alternative renewables such as solar, wind, hemp, etc ... and give readers exposures to companies and/or businesses that are actually making honest efforts to fight for the green cause instead of typical greenwashing BULLSHIT.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Note that Big Oil already has managed to control Iraq oil, in one sense -
Posted by: thoughtcriminal on Mar 6, 2007 7:50 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
They've managed to keep it off the market, more or less, and to prevent it from being an independent oil producer. This is a good article, but it neglects the history of the global oil supply in the 20th century, and this is important to understand, since it shapes the psychology of the oil majors.

Ever since the huge discoveries in East Texas in the early 1930s, the problem has been too much oil, and the goal of the ol majors has been to deliberately limit production in order to keep prices high. The era of the oil glut is almost over, however, and Iraq is probably the last of the swing producers. A swing producer is one who can control prices by suddenly flooding the market with oil. Texas used to be this, then it was Saudi Arabia...and next may be Iraq.

Iraq's oil is cheaper to produce and of higher quality than most other oil in the world - meaning that whoever controls Iraqi oil (a) gets higher profits due to lower costs on any oil sold, and (b) more importantly, can control the global price of oil.

The neocon / Big Oil plan in the Mideast is thus remarkably similar to the British plans of the early 20th century, or to Hitlers "Plan Orient" during WWII - control all the oilfields and all the access points. Some view this as a path to 'geostrategic dominance', others see nothing but dollar signs, and who knows what the lunatic fundamentalist Christian fascists see - Armageddon? - but the goal is the same.

However, the oil majors are finding that this is all a delicate balancing game - because as soon as oil gets anywhere near $70 a barrel, the renewable alternatives suddenly become economically attractive. The truth of the matter is that a combination of energy efficiency, lifestyle changes, solar and wind power, new technology and sustainable biofuel production can make fossil fuels obsolete - and the fossil fuel barons don't want to give up their positions of wealth, power and influence, so they do all they can to suppress renewables and promote fossil fuels (with the active help of the corporate press and the public relations propaganda corps).

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

"Going to"??? lol
Posted by: Iconoclast421 on Mar 6, 2007 7:55 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
That is such a farce. They've controlled Iraq's oil for 60+ years. They've kept it in the ground. That's what they want. It's what the saudis want too. Hell even the Iranians love it. And the russians too!

The oil companies dont want to touch that oil until they start losing money or market share. Thanks to the near limitless potential of oil as a commodity, it could be a long time before any of the big money players have a vested interest in pumping in Iraq. Our job, as a neocon controlled country, is to make sure that when that time comes, there will be so much instability there that no western company will be able to pump. I wouldn't be surprised if China ends up pumping the oil. The Iraqis hate us, but I wonder how they feel about Chinese? As if giving away our manufacturing base wasn't bad enough. Thanks George & Bill! You make a great team.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

You Talk About A Sure Bet!
Posted by: mite on Mar 6, 2007 8:29 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
1913-1936 Bankers with the help of U.S. Congress and Presidents turn control of "We-The-Peoples" currency and gold over to private individuals. (Article 1 Sec: 8)
Federal Reserve System and Internal Revenue Service, both private corporations- not a U.S. Department.

March 9, 1933- U.S. Government Bankrupt- total control secured by International Banks, all U.S. Gold transfered over-seas to Europe as loan collaterials.

1933- All Nations in Europe-North America file bankruptcy in Geneva and enter into a contract with International Bankers, and all Constitutions-Sovereignty's surrended. The Uniform Commercial Code created and agreed to. All laws now are governed by UCC. "The Secret Oath" taken by all Judges-Lawyers"

1970-Present, Federal Reserve Notes backed by 'Oil' through International Bankers. U.S. Dollar made from 'Air' only a unit of credit- not real currency.

1913-Present, U.S. Military and Congress-Presidents must conqure any and all nations for wealth-resources for financial security with international Bank Loans.

You bet the Oil companies will control Iraq, and middle east, and our children-grandchildren will be in debt and die for these bankers.

Think all this is B.S.! Don't believe Me? Ask yourself- do I want the truth?

Read history and research people- or keep watching TV and tell everyone you love your children!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I thought that was what this war was all about.
Posted by: bookwoman on Mar 6, 2007 10:57 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I thought the whole purpose of this war was to get control of the Iraq Oil Fields. The summit of oil companies just prior to the start of the sword rattling scared the US. Oil Companies so much that Bush had to get control so the likes of Exxon Mobil wouldn't have to compete with Shell, Citgo, etc. I have a feeling that our troops will start to withdraw as soon as the Iraqi Parliament approves an income sharing agreement and the big boys know with whom they are dealing.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The American military is now a "petrol-defense force"
Posted by: Aufklaerung_Baboon on Mar 6, 2007 3:46 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I've talked to some soldiers back from Iraq, and many of them have told me the same thing...many of them spent large portions of their time 'guarding' oil pumps and oil refineries and not much time patrolling the streets of Iraq or engaged in 'combat.' They had to rotate alot because this guard duty is so mind-numbingly boring -- because therse guards were being constantly rotated in and out of oil-well guard duty, MANY American soliders have spent some of their time in Iraq or elsewhere as nothing more than 'guard dogs' for oil companies.

If these soldiers hadn't done this babysitting of oil-wells and refineries themselves, they ALL knew people that had spent large portions of their time overseas in Iraq 'guarding' the oil there.

Can't Exxon, Shell, BP, and all of the other oil companies provide their own private security companies to guard 'their' assets since they have been reaping record-breaking profits in the last few years?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

This is something worth looking into...
Posted by: SteveB on Mar 6, 2007 4:55 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Early on, US-appointed Prime Minister Iyad Allawi floated a radical privatization plan: giving foreign corporations ownership of the subsoil petroleum. That sort of arrangement is used only in the United States in all other countries oil is state property, even if private firms drill and sell it.

So why is the U.S. the only country in the world that doesn't own the oil under our own ground?

Hmmm... I wonder...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Halliburton In Iran Despite Sanctions
Posted by: Jason Jordan on Mar 6, 2007 7:44 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
NBC's Investigative Unit has video of a Halliburton drilling operation with Halliburton logos everywhere - but it's in Iran, where the company gained a contract in January to drill in the massive Pars gas field.

"I am baffled that any American company would want to have employees operating in Iran," says Sen. Susan Collins, R-Maine. "I would think they'd be ashamed."

Halliburton says the operation — videotaped by NBC News — is entirely legal. It's run by a subsidiary called "Halliburton Products and Services Limited," based outside the U.S. In fact, the law allows foreign subsidiaries of U.S. corporations to do business in Iran under strict conditions.

..."I am formally announcing my intention to cut off all trade and investment with Iran," announced President Bill Clinton in 1995.

Sources close to the Halliburton investigation tell NBC News that after that announcement, Halliburton decided that business with Iran, then conducted through at least five companies, would all be done through a subsidiary incorporated in the Cayman Islands.

"It's gotten around the sanctions and the very spirit and reasons for the sanctions," says Victor Comras, a former State Department expert on sanctions.

For Halliburton to have done this legally, the foreign subsidiary operating in Iran must be independent of the main operation in Texas. Yet, when an NBC producer approached managers in Iran, he was sent to company officials in Dubai. But they said only Halliburton headquarters in Houston could talk about operations in Iran. Still, Halliburton maintains its Iran subsidiary does make independent business decisions.
Now Halliburton is under federal investigation - the focus being on whether it was their intention all along to evade sanctions. Congress is looking at closing the loophole in the law.

Halliburton says they will pull out of Iran - in three years when the contract ends.

But I've a question - if their old boss Dick Cheney manages to get his way and the US attacks Iran, would Halliburton get government compensation for it's destroyed equipment and potential profits? If not, then maybe they know for sure something the rest of us can only wonder about concerning the likelihood of such an attack.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Support Iraq's workers who are fighting the armed robbery
Posted by: katinmn on Mar 8, 2007 6:00 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
http://www.truthout.org/issues_06/022207LA.shtml

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]