Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

One Bite at a Time: A Beginner's Guide to Vegetarianism

By Kathy Freston, Huffington Post. Posted March 2, 2007.


How to become vegetarian -- and help save the environment -- in six easy steps.

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

More stories by Kathy Freston

Get AlterNet in
your mailbox!

 
Advertisement

I've argued in two recent essays, "A Few More 'Inconvenient Truths'" and "Vegetarian Is the New Prius," that a plant-based diet is a good choice for the planet, our health and animals. Of course, there are other things we should be doing -- from cutting down on our consumption to working for governmental change to buying organic and on and on -- but where diet is concerned, a vegetarian diet is the hands-down best choice for those of us who care about animals and the environment.

I heard from a lot of people who wanted help in making the transition to a vegetarian (or mostly vegetarian) diet. Let's face it: If you've been eating meat all your life, this sort of a change can be daunting even just to think about, let alone act on. Happily, it's easier than ever today to make the transition from meat-eater to vegetarian, and the following suggestions should help even the most die-hard carnivores make the switch.

First: Transition

If you're not ready to give up meat completely, start by eating meatless meals one or two days a week. The Johns Hopkins School of Public Health, Columbia University's School of Public Health, and other public health schools have designed a "Meatless Monday" campaign to help Americans avoid our four top killers -- heart disease, stroke, diabetes and cancer -- by eating meat-free at least every Monday. The "Meatless Monday" program provides recipes, meal plans, nutritional guidelines, cooking tips and more.

My only problem with the campaign is that some of the recipes feature fish, and fish are definitely not vegetables. If you're eating fish, you're eating meat, and the recent studies on fish are even scarier than the studies on beef or any other food. The three-part front page series in the Chicago Tribune about brain damage and other health problems caused by mercury, PCBs, and the other toxins found in fish and the front page piece in the Wall Street Journal about the teen whose fish consumption put him in remedial classes should be enough to turn anyone off fish consumption. For omega-3 fatty acids, go with flax seeds, walnuts and leafy greens.

Second: Give up the little animals first

Although many people tend to stop eating red meat before they give up chicken, turkey or fish, from a humane standpoint, this is backwards. Birds are arguably the most abused animals on the planet, and birds and fish yield less flesh than cows or pigs, so farmers and fishers kill more of them to satisfy America's meat habit. If you choose to give up meat in stages, stop eating chickens and turkeys first, then fish, and then pigs and cows. Some will suggest that cattle are the worst for the environment, but that seems like hair-splitting to me. The Amazon rain forest is being cut down to grow soybeans to feed chickens; it's chicken and pig farms that are poisoning the Atlantic Ocean, and vastly more energy is required if we eat the chickens who are fed grain rather than eating that grain directly.

Third: If you can't give up one particular animal product, give up all the other ones

One friend told me that he just loves burgers too much to give them up; I suggested that he give up all animal products except burgers. Some of my friends can't give up ice cream or cream in their coffee or whatever -- so give up everything but that. That's a huge step forward, and I suspect that after eating mostly vegetarian for awhile, you'll decide that those burgers or that ice cream aren't so tasty anymore. And you'll probably find that you enjoy the faux meats and dairy-free options just as much.

Fourth: Examine your diet, and substitute

Take a look at the meals that you and your family already enjoy, and you'll probably notice that many of them can be made without any meat or with mock meats (which are great transition foods) instead of animal flesh. For example, instead of spaghetti and meat sauce, make spaghetti and marinara sauce, or instead of beef burritos, try tasty bean burritos. Replace ground beef with the vegetarian variety made by Boca or Morningstar Farms, which can be found in just about any grocery store. Or try Morningstar Farms' faux chicken strips and steak strips and Boca's Chik'n Patties. If you need help putting together a shopping list, check out the product reviews at VegCooking.com before you head out to the store.


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: meat, health, vegetarian, eating, diet, animals, environment, food, vegetarianism

Kathy Freston is a self-help author and personal growth and spirituality counselor.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Try giving up cows first
Posted by: DataDoc on Mar 2, 2007 12:19 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Cow meat may be high in iron, but it also clogs the arteries, is difficult to digest, and cannot be grown in a small backyard like chickens. I would suggest that new vegetarians will find it easier to give up red meats like cow and pig, before chicken and fish. On a cruelty basis, chickens raised in a backyard, free-range garden have a more humane life than cows in a factory farm. Where I live there are few cattle farms, so cow meat must be imported, but organic chickens are grown locally in backyards. I advocate a vegetarian lifestyle, but if you are going in steps, I am going to recommend giving up the big guys first.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Give vegetarianism a try. Posted by: heidiparker
» RE: Try giving up cows first Posted by: bornxeyed
» RE: Try giving up cows first Posted by: WitchyNy
» RE: Try giving up cows first Posted by: mmissinglink
» RE: Try giving up cows first Posted by: domenico234
» By your logic Posted by: AdamG
» RE: By your logic Posted by: mmissinglink
» RE: By your logic Posted by: farmerbob2007
» RE: By your logic Posted by: mjabele
» RE: By your logic Posted by: farmerbob2007
» RE: By your logic Posted by: mjabele
» I don't even harm a fly... Posted by: farmerbob2007
» RE: By your logic Posted by: AdamG
you don't get ethical points for being declawed
Posted by: profoflitandtrout on Mar 2, 2007 1:12 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The assumption of the vegetarian moral and biological(?) high groud Feston invokes in this article, as the last two, is offensive to those who make conscious decisions about how we participate in the dietary system we are all thrown into in the different places we inhabit. I have to question the moral purity Feston assumes: rather than engaging the complexities of till death for instance, that still some deaths occur with any massive agricultural soy or corn farming, despite what percentage of the whole those deaths might be, she still accepts those deaths however horrible they may be. Thus, a utilitarian justification is offered (minimizing the number of deaths but not the suffering of individuals killed)by someone purporting to have an inherently more progressive 'consciousness'.
As someone who hunts the majority of his meat from the place I inhabit, it is offensive for someone to claim that minimizing the suffering of individuals is somehow a lesser moral good than minimizing the number of those who suffer. I minimize the suffering of all the animals I kill to eat and look for such minimization in other meat products I ingest. I am conscious of each of my decisions, I eat MorningStar corndogs and chicken patties when I can afford to, and I make the fullest use of all that I harvest whatever the form of life it may be. Ending life is a part of living. Compassion is acting upon this understanding. The declawed don't get moral points for not scratching you.
As an andendum which I am certain Alternet readers will jump on, remember that when you cite non-peer reviewed sources like veg.org to claim that we were not made to eat meat, you sound as ignorant as Creationists. The typical American diet may be destructive, and I aplaud those who desist in such moral complicity, but meat nonetheless continues to be a nutritional source that sustains the health of the animal we are. Anthropology is not controversial on this point. The dominantly herbivorous Gigantapithicus didn't fare well after all.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» It's joshys signature Posted by: AdamG
» For Life, Go Vegan Posted by: mwiese
I'm insulted
Posted by: jwc on Mar 2, 2007 1:48 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
by that final paragraph- actually, the entire tone of the story is elitist. It implies that global warming and obesity wouldn't be around without vegetarians, and that only vegetarians can be healthy, energetic, have compassion, make the planet "livable" (whatever that means), and enjoy a wide variety of foods.

Referring to eating meat as eating "animal flesh" is a cheap way to get an emotional response from someone who agrees with your point and doesn't invite for any discussion on the topic.

luckily I know vegetarians who don't walk around thinking they fart rainbows. unless you're growing your own veggies in your backyard, live in a hut made from fallen tree limbs and dead grass, don't own a car and read at night by starlight, quit implying that your way is the only way.

I understand the environmental, animal-friendly, health reasons for being a vegetarian. just don't shove that philosophy down my throat like it's the only way.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Meat is "animal flesh" Posted by: A.T.
» RE: I'm insulted Posted by: Fishbone Soldier
» okay the medium is the message Posted by: essential
» RE: I'm insulted Posted by: AmyB
» RE: I'm insulted Posted by: WitchyNy
» RE: I'm insulted Posted by: mjabele
» RE: I'm insulted Posted by: electricwind
» RE: I'm insulted Posted by: jwc
» animal flesh is good! Posted by: Iconoclast421
» RE: I'm insulted Posted by: jwc
» RE: I'm insulted Posted by: jwc
» RE: I'm insulted Posted by: mmissinglink
» RE: I'm insulted Posted by: babs
» RE: I'm insulted Posted by: jwc
» RE: I'm insulted Posted by: mmissinglink
» RE: I'm insulted Posted by: farmerbob2007
A point on rhetoric of diet/ecology
Posted by: gjames on Mar 2, 2007 3:57 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I submit that those who advocate a diet that is not harmful to the planet do not argue for vegetarianism. In a sense, the vegetarian and vegan stance is absolutist - a more reasonable approach that would work better to change agriculture and diet practices is encouraging the consumption of meat two to three times per week. You would argue from the health perspective - meat is healthy (the balance of evidence most likely confirms this), but eating meat every day is not healthy (also confirmed). Arguing for vegetarianism can result in getting bogged down into whether meat is healthy at all - rather than the more complex health issue that is not centered only meat's healthiness, but diet in general. Basically, people need to be informed about nutrition and capable of making complex choices with lots of variables (these being all the plants and animal products you can eat) and if the focus is "meat: yes or no?" that more fundamental need for dietary balance in general gets pushed out of the way. Health and nutrition needs to be the first argument here - once you have a kind of negotiable framework ('meat is good for you, but not every day, your body needs all sorts of things and from many sources, here's a few things I know about how to build a nutritious diet...') you can recommend practical things that people can do like, tomorrow, or for dinner even, that also ease the pressures on our flawed agriculture system. Going forward, you can also spread information about diet choices and the issues that we consider more focused on ecology: how far does food travel to get to your plate? How do government policies influence what is grown and how? What do different agriculture practices mean for pollution?

Point - ethically or morally, vegetarianism, veganism, these may be superior. Rhetorically, argue for reducing meet - hell, treat a coworker to a salad or something. Don't have meat dishes at your parties. Talk about cooking and eating all of the time. Just to get a conversation going. Changing agriculture practices is hugely important for reasons many of us are familiar with, and the same is true about nutrition and health practices in US society - I think that some of the ideas I've put out in this little note might point to how we generate movement in the right direction.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» You better get a move on Posted by: AdamG
» Just have to ask Posted by: anthroman
» RE: Who are these nonhuman animals? Posted by: Mrs. Robinson
Disappointed
Posted by: SonjaDrimmer on Mar 2, 2007 4:33 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As a vegetarian, I am consistently disappointed by the articles regarding vegetarianism/veganism posted on this site. They are generally pieces that assume an elitist and preachy tone, which misrepresents my (and I imagine many other veegetarians') principles.

In America, being a vegetarian or vegan is a privilege-- the cost of eating tends to be higher if one wants to maintain good health, which is also difficult to do when living outside of an urban center. To presume that vegetarianism confers moral superiority is insulting, then, when there are those who want to avoid animal products but cannot do so. And, frankly, not everyone wants to do so.

Rather, what we should be advocating is a fundamental shift in the way we produce and distribute animal products in this country. People should have the choice to consume meat, but it should be meat produced on smaller concerns (as opposed to in massive factory-like conditions), without chemicals pumped into their bodies, and not shipped from far-flung regions. We as consumers deserve choice, but every choice available to us should be a safe and responsible one from the start.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Animals choose domestication Posted by: farmerbob2007
» Vegetarian voices of reason - yes. Posted by: boygranddakar
» RE: Disappointed Posted by: WitchyNy
» An ethical imperative Posted by: mwiese
» RE: Disappointed Posted by: joshuawelch
» Meat is cheaper?! Posted by: Bouldercreeker
» RE: Meat is cheaper?! Posted by: babs
» RE: Meat is cheaper?! Posted by: Bouldercreeker
The Great American Meatout being held around the country in March
Posted by: ShelterBay on Mar 2, 2007 4:45 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
for those who want some hands on, face to face help with moving toward a plant based diet, check your local vegetarian group or go to www.meatout.org for locations and information.

the reaction to your moderate article shows just how defensive folks are to diet change. It's not easy. For some it's a slow process and any steps in that direction help the planet, the animals and ones own health.

We became veggies in our 50s, primarily for health reasons, but quickly discovered the environmental impact of what we had been doing. John Robbins book, The Food Revolution, is a great eye opener to the impact of an animal based diet.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

finally someone not arguing absolute purity
Posted by: counterpoint on Mar 2, 2007 5:01 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
One of my personal gripes with vegetarians is that they resemble orthodox followers of religions with their ridiculous and made up food prohibitions. The concepts of kosher, pure, halal, are just excuses to keep your daughters away from marrying outside the clan, and to claim moral superiority and steadfastness of resolve over others.
This author instead says it's okay if there are some some animal ingredients in a restaurant meal and that is a welcome progress in a movement that has many traits of weird sectarianism, despite the very good reasons that exist for a more vegetarian lifestyle.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» A refreshing change! Posted by: kazz67
warning....warning!!!
Posted by: ellie on Mar 2, 2007 5:05 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
for those of us who are part of the analog-designer injected insulin club to stay alive, aka: type 1 diabetics, be careful with vegan and type 1 diabetes.... the insulins (yup, all of them now) are fine tuned to work with a certain amount of animal protien... found myself in the ER a couple of times because before my pancreas conked out, I was 100% vegan... had to start including certain amounts of animal protien to remain out of the ICU.... the glycemic index is also part of the equasion....

vegan diets rely on plant protien and usually this is high density protien that the insulins are not made for...

you can do vegan to a point, but it requires close work with a CDE, dietician, an endochrnologist who is interested and really good health insurance for an insulin pump and 2-3 dr. visits a week of one kind of dr's office visit for months...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: warning....warning!!! Posted by: WitchyNy
» RE: warning....warning!!! Posted by: ellie
A bit off topic...
Posted by: MyLeftFoot on Mar 2, 2007 5:11 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
was wondering about veggie burgers. I have cut way back on red meats, pork, poultry, fish consumption. have been substituting with veggie burgers. a lot of these veggie burgers are made by big corporations like Archer Daniels Midland which , from what I understand, are big in the development of GMO foods.
Does anyone know for a fact if these veggie burgers are made with GMO's? I have emailed some of the websites to try and get some info but no response, so will consider that a yes.
thanks.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: A bit off topic... Posted by: Johnny Hempseed
» RE: A bit off topic... Posted by: veggiegrrrl
» RE: A bit off topic... Posted by: epski
» RE: A bit off topic... Posted by: WitchyNy
» RE: A bit off topic... Posted by: MyLeftFoot
» If it's Organic! Posted by: DataDoc
» RE: A bit off topic... Posted by: annamargaret1866
Eating Meat is Unecessary. Period.
Posted by: MP81 on Mar 2, 2007 5:13 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Why kill and torture (yes, cutting a piglets' teeth or testicles off without painkiller is definitely "torture") when we don't have to? Why hurt the environment when we don't have to? Why do something grossly unhealthy when we don't have to? No matter how you slice it, meat is an unecessary evil. You can come up with justifications to continue eating it, but its no different than all the justifications (that's a euphemism for "excuses," by the way) that people have concocted for ages to continue doing harmful things (i.e. slavery, denying women the right to vote, etc). Its far easier to make excuses than to change.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Valdes Vegetarian
Posted by: pastora on Mar 2, 2007 5:27 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Of course this is all well and good for those living in a warm, lush climate. Those of us in the frozen north don't have that luxury, unless, of course, we have a monsterous oil dependant infrastructure to deliver those tasty little tropical fruits to our door. Perhaps you should explain the error of their ways to the Inuit.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Valdes Vegetarian Posted by: brad
» RE: Valdes Vegetarian Posted by: WitchyNy
Save Us, Boca BurgerTM, Save Us!!!
Posted by: grumble-bum on Mar 2, 2007 5:43 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What gives? Is this person a personal life-trainer to the Alternet staff, or something?

Last time around, we were treated to a shallow advertisement for Prius automobiles & gratuitous celebrity worship, coupled with a view of Vegetarianism that completely ignored the Slow Food movement (with it's reduction of harm from both mass meat & vegetable production) & came complete with more than the daily recommended dose of vitamin Moralism.

This time, continued conflation of Vegetarianism & Veganism, & ads for Boca Burgers (Kraft f*ckin' Foods, people!) seem to be on the menu. You would think that someone who claims to be so aware of her reader comments (& apparently aims to make a living writing on this subject), might by now have realized that there are differences between these two non-meat diets & stop using the terms interchangeably half of the time.

One might also hope that if her concern in promoting non-meat lifestyles lies in "saving the planet", she could do better than just listing big-brand products that can be purchased in "any grocery store". Here's a hint- If you can find it in any supermarket, it is not "good" for the environment! It means that the product in question ("organic" or not) was grown & processed on a staggeringly massive scale, & shipped vast distances. Both of these factors combine to effectively negate any claims of environmental stewardship. To be fair, the author does pay lip -service to this catch-22, but ends up maintaining that even so, the Vegetarian(TM) can still feel morally superior for not eating meat. Besides undercutting her initial attempts to avoid simple moralising & focus on the environmental & health benefits of Vegetarianism, such a stance completely (yet again!) ignores local & sustainable options. I fail to see how my consumption of meat raised sustainably, killed compassionately & shipped between a few hundred to under twenty miles of my home, makes me a less moral or environmentally concerned person than someone who blindly follows her chipper advice & buys a goddamn Boca Burger!

What is especially galling is that she appears to have finally read the excellent Micheal Pollan, & yet somehow avoided "digesting" the "meat" of his argument- namely, that the large-scale production of vegetable crops & meat animals (both conventional & "organic") poses all sorts of environmental problems, problems best addressed by finding small-scale, local alternatives. Alternatives that apparently, in the author's Trademarked, Celebricentric universe, do not exist.

If there was any portion of this article that didn't come off as half-baked, it was the suggestion that Vegans relax a bit about the possibility of finding traces of animal by-products in their food when eating out. This is truly difficult to avoid, & while restaurants & their employees naturally try to be accommodating, it's impossible to please everyone. As a cook, I've often found myself wondering why some people go out to eat at all...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Go Veg for Life
Posted by: A.T. on Mar 2, 2007 5:45 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Another great column, Kathy. Thank you for reminding people about this.

And anyone who is interested in going veg, try it for a week and feel the difference.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Kudos to anyone who tries to help earth by going veg
Posted by: A.T. on Mar 2, 2007 6:03 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I think it is insane that people are criticizing others for trying to reduce the amount of destruction going on on this planet by going veg. Would you crticize people for recycling their aluminum cans?

Anyone who takes a step to change their lifestyle in order to protect their health, the environment, and to reduce animal suffering is simply making decision based on reason and logic. To discourage this, to whine and complain because someone is acting logicaly, is madness.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Exactly. Exactly. Exactly. Posted by: grumble-bum
My family fights obesity, diabetes, and heart disease
Posted by: nikolaj on Mar 2, 2007 6:05 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
And I maintain proper weight and health with a vegan diet.

It was really exciting to transition to a vegan diet, and I enjoy more diverse foods now than I ever have before. Plus, I eat at every restaurant my omnivore friends eat at (with a little extra kindness to my server). And I definitely fart less now that I don't eat dairy.

Try it for the animals, try it for the environment, but try it for yourself.

You may just bust out of a food rut and find yourself enjoying every last morsel of food.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Lionel martin Practitioner of Objective Nutritional Therapies
Posted by: lm on Mar 2, 2007 6:05 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If you want to do your own research check Uffe Ravnskovs M.D., phd.'s treatise on cholesterol.....if you want to debate me please do, but I have little time this morning, I have clients to tend to.... but I look forward to comments from all comers as I have over 700 pages and 4000 references at my disposal to argue that saturated fat and cholesterol are NOT bad for you. On the contrary, it is the Pufa's (poly unsaturates from soy, safflower, canola , veggie and corn oils that increase oxidation, glycation, and peroxidation and immune system weakening in my clients....as a matter of fact they use these substances to weaken immune systems in transplant patients so they don't reject their organs....eat beans...in many people they don't have the enzymes to digest them properly. Also the lectins in many grains activate the immune system and make the blood coagulate...soy in larger amounts...(beyond a condiment amounts) strips the body of calcium and loads you up with phytates.....unless it is tempeh it is a toxic food . Soy milk is the worst (horrible). How many vegetarians are capable of planning their meals out adequately...statistically they have slightly lower heart disease mortality but higher risk for cancers and auto immune diseases.
You should see their blood under a darkfield microscope, it is just as hideous as their meat eating counterparts.....if not even more so because most vegetarians do not get enough of certain b vitamins...zinc, and of course amino acids. I also find wacked out blood sugars because of the usually high carb content..in their diets.
Look at our meat eating cave man breathren- big jaws, no teeth rotting....no arthritis, no signs of immune diseases, and aging diseases, or blood sugar disorders, etc.... or the Masai and Amazonian native counterparts....I WILL NOT ARGUE ON MORAL GROUNDS AS THAT IS UP TO THE PERSON and highly SUBJECTIVE....BUT LET'S BE REAL, it is overpopulation and current agricultural practices that need revamping....not the perfectly healthy burger I eat (that also has heart tissue ground into it) and the unpasteuized, unhomogenized milk I drink from the Amish farm where they still till with drought horses and feed cows on the open pasture wirth no use of petroleum based fertilizers, fossil fuel tractors and mega cattle farms....care to guess how many liters of fuel it took to produce your head of primarily undigestable lettuce (humans don't produce cellulase, the enzyme responable for breaking down plant matter) and get it to the grocery store where all those fossil fuels are being used to keep it cool?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» what a load of cow %*@ Posted by: A.T.
It's Simple
Posted by: ctrain on Mar 2, 2007 6:22 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It's amazing how convulted arguments about diet (and especially arguments against being a vegetarian) get. Here's the straightforward argument for being vegetarian:

The meat industry hurts animals. A lot. By going vegetarian you prevent about 100 animals a year from undergoing that suffering. We don't need to eat meat to be healthy (a lot of evidence suggests we're far healthier without it). Because going vegetarian helps a lot of animals, and because it doesn't hurt us, we should go vegetarian.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» It's (not that) Simple Posted by: anthroman
» RE: It's Simple Posted by: Jarmadi