Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Mothers Facing Pollution Risks Find Allies in the Religious Right

By Teresita Perez, AlterNet. Posted March 5, 2007.


The religious right and environmentalists are teaming up to protect women and their babies from the dangers of exposure to pollution and toxic waste.
Advertisement

Tuli Hughes's first three pregnancies ended in miscarriage. During her fourth pregnancy, she gave birth prematurely to a baby with a fatal birth defect who died a few minutes after being born. On her fifth try, Tuli again gave birth prematurely; the baby weighed about one pound and also died within minutes.

An explanation may be found in the environmental conditions in Tuli's neighborhood of Bayview-Hunters Point, which is home to San Francisco's main power and sewage treatment plants and the now-closed Hunters Point Naval Shipyard, a Superfund toxic waste site.

Bayview-Hunters Point, a low-income, predominantly African-American community in southeast San Francisco, has one of the highest infant mortality rates in California, comparable to rates in the developing world. Between 1992 and 2001, the area's infant mortality rate averaged 11.8 per 1,000 births, well above the national average of 6.8 per 1,000 and the average for San Francisco, which has the nation's lowest infant mortality rate among large cities. Recent studies also show that women in the community suffer from high rates of miscarriages and premature births, as well as breast and cervical cancer.

Low-income women of color like Tuli not only reside disproportionately around chemical dumps, power plants and other polluting facilities; they are also plagued by other socioeconomic handicaps such as lack of quality health care that exacerbate their reproductive health problems. These other handicaps undoubtedly contribute to the elevated reproductive health risks in areas like Bayview-Hunters Point, but they do not fully explain them. Research points to environmental contamination as a major part of the story.

Exposure to even small amounts of toxic chemicals during the early stages of pregnancy can lead to miscarriages and premature births, while prolonged exposure can cause infertility, endometriosis (a condition in which tissue that normally lines the uterus grows in other areas of the body), cervical cancer, and other reproductive complications. Children born to mothers exposed to toxic chemicals are also at greater risk of birth defects, learning disabilities, and other developmental illnesses. The Center for American Progress recently released a paper titled "More Than a Choice" that urges a broader conversation about reproductive health and rights -- one that goes beyond the narrow but dominant issue of abortion. As the paper indicates, a key part of this conversation must be providing a safe environment for healthy pregnancies and babies. The debate over abortion, while important, has tended to distract from this and other pressing issues of reproductive justice like access to quality health care and child care to the detriment of women and families across the country. Issues like these have the potential to create common ground even among those who have butted heads in the past. Indeed, a shared concern for healthy babies and families and a healthy environment has helped forge one of the unlikeliest partnerships Washington has seen in years: the religious right and the environmental community.

Conservative evangelical Christians have begun to press for stronger environmental protections to ensure the health of vulnerable communities. Much attention has been given to recent efforts by prominent evangelicals pressing for action on global warming. But some are also taking on mercury pollution as a threat to the "sanctity of life."

Mercury emissions from power plants contaminate coastlines, rivers, and lakes, and "bioaccumulate" in fish. Nearly all fish contain traces of mercury, but fish at or near the top of the food chain contain higher levels of mercury that may harm a fetus or young child's developing nervous system. Children born to women who eat mercury-contaminated fish are at a higher risk for a number of neurological disorders including mental retardation and learning disabilities.


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: environment, pollution, health care, reproductive health, toxic waste, infant mortality

Teresita Perez is the Deputy Speechwriter at the Center for American Progress.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Get Beyond Labels
Posted by: edith on Mar 5, 2007 1:25 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It's encouraging to see more and more awareness of environment problems by religious "conservatives" (the evangelicals are not all conservative, and not all conservatives are evangelicals). Rich Cizik, according to the Washington Post of March 4, the spokesperson and lobbyist of the National Assn of Evangelicals, has come under fire from James Dobson and some other same old names in the "religious right" community for his outspoken support of efforts to curb global warming. Fortunately Cizik has been backed by his current boss, who replaced the pervert (Haggard) as head of the National Assn of Evangelicals.

Although I am not a believer in the Jewish or Christian idea of a seperate being called god who is busy intruding in human life, broader support for health measures connected to environmental abuse should be welcomed by so called progressives and liberals.

It remains to be seen if the ideological blinders of the Left parallel those same blinders worn by James Dobson and the conventional religious right which puts abortion ahead of earth care as a moral principle.

Leaders like Rich Cizik are trying to convince Christians that the environment's health and the fetus' health are equivalent values. That movement of thought can lead to some powerful results.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Get Beyond Labels Posted by: Clamasaur
» RE: Get Beyond Labels Posted by: edith
Every little bit helps
Posted by: Moonray on Mar 5, 2007 6:28 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Now that they have recognized the dangers of pollution, perhaps there is hope for weaning them from their primitive belief in their Bronze Age sky god.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

TRYING TO WIN BACK THE SECURITY MOMS
Posted by: VZEQICVA on Mar 5, 2007 7:09 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'm all for cleaning up the environment, but how did it get this way in the firstplace? And when did anyone besides Al Gore think to do anything about it. Big corporations across this country dump whatever that want into the air and water. Now the Republicans need a way to scare the soccer moms and win them back. They have no intention of doing anything about it. The cost of cleaning up would have to come from profits. In your dreams. Thanks, ANNA

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

TRYING TO WIN BACK THE SECURITY MOMS
Posted by: VZEQICVA on Mar 5, 2007 7:09 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'm all for cleaning up the environment, but how did it get this way in the firstplace? And when did anyone besides Al Gore think to do anything about it. Big corporations across this country dump whatever that want into the air and water. Now the Republicans need a way to scare the soccer moms and win them back. They have no intention of doing anything about it. The cost of cleaning up would have to come from profits. In your dreams. Thanks, ANNA

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Finally-- An Uplifting Story on Religious Advocacy
Posted by: faultroy on Mar 5, 2007 7:58 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'm very grateful to Alternet for running this story. Maybe now we can get Alternet's favorite minority group--"feminists"
to come out of the liberal closet and to support something other than the "inane."
It would be wonderful to see some of the Swarthmore/Brandeis Women Studies crowd to actually do something positive by promoting this story and suggesting unfettered active support rather than constantly carping and whining on how discriminated they are.
Again thank you Alternet for bringing this to our attention.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The religious right's blind support for Bush's slaughter of the innocent?
Posted by: thoughtcriminal on Mar 5, 2007 8:05 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
How many kids have died in Iraq because of GW Bush, the religious right's "Holy Warrior"? They are nothing but hypocrites, and their religious right-wing organizations are largely funded by the same fossil fuel billionaires who are behind the neoconservative agenda, and who do everything they can to gut anti-pollution laws. It's a nice fantasy, but that's all.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Don't expect the Religious Right to be any different from Corporate America anytime soon.
Posted by: maxpayne on Mar 5, 2007 9:01 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Right now, the best you can expect from the Religious Right is the same "greenwashing" response you'd expect from Corporate America. Let's see if the Religious Right actually gets its act together and provides long term care and not the typical short term BULLSHITTING followed by their usual turning blind eyes when push comes to shove.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

These evangelicals are not part of the religious right
Posted by: Jasonix on Mar 5, 2007 6:22 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Evangelicals who care about the environment are not part of the Religious Right. The Religious Right is not a distinctly "evangelical" movement - it has penetrated far deeper into the Mormon church, where it's a natural fit, and nearly as deep into the Roman Catholic Church as it has into evangelical churches. About 75% of evangelical Christians identify with the religious right (roughly the same percentage that identifies with Creationism, Biblical literalism, and belief in the Rapture), so there is a minority that is not "right-wing." Of the 75% that identifies with the Religious Right, most are just under-educated, fairly gullable simpletons who don't understand economics or the true agenda of the Republican elite.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

If I have to kiss up to the conservatives
Posted by: Kelly on Mar 5, 2007 8:06 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
to get the rocket fuel and pthalalates out of my breast milk, then I'll pucker up.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I don't hold out any hope...
Posted by: bob t on Mar 9, 2007 7:51 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...that any on the religious right will ever see the light they are way to busy hating us all and killing us all for the corportocracy of George Bush and the Bush-Republican wars for profit. The only right winger that saw some light was Richard Cizik and he has been soundly denounced and trounced by the entire religious right. Besides the rr(religious right) is owned by the SBC and the pope of the catholic church and they are supporters of killing and wars of profit. I don't know of one religious leader that has taken a strong stand against the pro-death agenda of the rr in the Middle East and else where. And don't anyone tell me the pope spoke out against war because he is the source of what is going on due entirely to the republican party of death which he totally supports. If the pope demanded diplomacy instead of endorsing republicans who are full of hate and promised to destroy liberals(does anyone remember Karl Rove's speech or the speech advocating the end of democracy that Scalia, a Supreme Court Jusitice, A damn useless catholic sob Supreme Court Justice gave in May, 2002. Good God ya'all thats all I have to hear. that and the fact that George Bush claims to be and is Jesus Christ and they are all working for the end times and if they work at it hard enough they will get it.
No the right wingers are so dedicated to hating and killing that they will never care for anyone especially anyone of color. The SBC and their friends the Catholics, my religion, are dedicated to white supremacy, neo-confederatism, neo-nazism(Popes and Vatican during WWII endorsed Hitler and the Nazis and the Holocaust) and since the days of Ronald Reagan are aligned with the Republican Party of death and destruction for PROFIT. The right wingers are only pro-birth and pro-death; don't listen to what they say watch what they DO.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]