Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

American Democracy From the Eyes of a Democratic Fundraiser

By Terrence McNally, AlterNet. Posted February 27, 2007.


Terry McAuliffe, former head of the Democratic National Committee and chair of Hillary Clinton's presidential campaign, on the Democratic vision of America and why we have yet to achieve it.

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

In Special Coverage

Belief:
Atheists, It's Time to Stand Up to Jesus
Russell Blackford, Udo Schuklenk

Corporate Accountability and WorkPlace:
As Foreclosure Nightmares Increase, Will More Homeowners Pay Off Their Bankers in Violence?
Scott Thill

DrugReporter:
Lies About Marijuana Drive People to a Much More Harmful Drug -- Booze
Steve Fox

Environment:
Why We Need Bees and More People Becoming Organic Beekeepers
Makenna Goodman

Food:
Despite Censorship By Beef Magnate, Michael Pollan Spreads Message About the Real Price of Cheap Food

Health and Wellness:
New York May Stop Heartless Health Insurers from Dropping Coverage When It Stops Being Profitable
William Ehart

Immigration:
NYC Marathon Raises Question of Who Is American Enough?
James E. Johnson, Jr.

Media and Technology:
Focusing on Fort Hood Killer's Beliefs Is an Easy Out to Avoid the Deeper Reasons for the Massacre
Mark Ames

Movie Mix:
The Yes Men: Pranksters Out to Fix the World
Mark Engler

Politics:
What Michelle and Barack's Marriage Has in Common with 56 Million Other Ones
Annabelle Gurwitch

Reproductive Justice and Gender:
Fetus-Shaped Potatoes? Going Undercover Inside the Weird World of Right-Wing Abortion Foes
Ann Neumann

Rights and Liberties:
"My Kids Want to Hide Their Identity; They're Scared Someone Will Attack Us": U.S. Muslims Being Targeted
Jaisal Noor

Sex and Relationships:
Instant Sex: Has the Digital Age Destroyed Relationships or Made Them Better?
Vanessa Richmond

Take Action:
G-20 Meetings: Nothing Much Happened in the Suites, and There Was Too Much Punch in the Streets
Laura Flanders

Water:
Why Natural Gas Is Not a Clean Energy Panacea
Stan Cox

World:
With Unemployment at 40 Percent, Afghan Teens Enlist in Army, Police
Lal Aqa Sherin

More stories by Terrence McNally

Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

Terry McAuliffe, former head of the Democratic National Committee, is a very accomplished player in American politics, and as the chair of Hillary Clinton's presidential campaign, he will be in the spotlight again for the next two years.

McAuliffe claims he does what he does so the average American can enjoy a chance at the American dream. A self-described Irish storyteller, he's written a lively book about his political career, the kind an average American can enjoy.

The book, "What a Party," is a fun read. But I also wonder what Terry McAuliffe has learned in the trenches about why that vision of an America that serves the people has been so difficult to achieve? Why has it been so hard to win elections with that laudable objective? And why so hard to implement when in power? Think universal healthcare.

After years of fundraising for Democrats, McAuliffe chaired the 2000 Democratic National Convention in Los Angeles, then served as chairman of the Democratic National Committee from 2001 to 2005. For the first time the DNC raised more than the RNC -- over $535 million.

McNally: When did you start your first business?

McAuliffe: When I was 14. My father had said, "Terry, you want to go to college, that's great. You'll have to pay for it." I was walking home one day in Syracuse, N.Y., after caddying -- carrying two golf bags up and down hills for five hours. I got about ten dollars, so basically I was getting $2 an hour. I figured I was throwing my life away. I got to start my own business. I got to get going.

I saw a guy out doing his driveway, hot tar all over him, and I said that's what they'll hire young kids to do. Got home, typed up a letter, went door to door, had 10 to 15 jobs my first day, From there, I went out and conned my uncle out of a truck, started buying all the tar wholesale, and I was off to the races. It was a great experience.

McNally: How did you first get involved in politics in a big way?

McAuliffe: My father was the treasurer of the Onadaga County Democratic Party. Ever since I was just a toddler, he had me going to events with him. I met LBJ when I was just a little tyke. I'll never forget huge LBJ looking down and asking, "How you doing, son?" Probably the only time in my life I was speechless. And I just stayed active. I did petition drives, licked stamps, sealed envelopes ...

McNally: You were financial director for Carter's reelection campaign at 22 ... ?

McAuliffe: I was going to law school. Friend of mine working in the Carter campaign said they needed help raising money. I'd never done it before, but I said, "Oh, heck, I can always go to law school." I left, and within a year I became Carter's No. 1 fundraiser and then his finance director.

McNally: "What a Party" is not your normal political memoir. How did you decide to write this book in this way at this time?

McAuliffe: I put it all out there -- about Yassir Arafat rubbing my leg at dinner one night, about the Korean Secret Service thinking that Bill Clinton and I were lovers. It's about 400 pages, and I think you'll actually laugh at most of 'em.

But on the serious side, I got really upset after the 2004 election. We should have beaten George Bush by 10 points. I thought the Kerry campaign blew it. Now I don't write this book to be negative. In fact, I sat with John Kerry at dinner and said here's what I'm writing. A lesson is learned by mistakes, so I figure it's time to lay it out. I talk about what we did wrong in 2000, and about the three or four things we really screwed up in 2004. Absolutely handed the election to George Bush. Got to learn by that if we're going to win in 2008.

McNally: Tell us those three or four things.

McAuliffe: You should know Kerry agrees with me, so it's not like he's mad.

He should have responded to the Swift Boats ads immediately. The man went to Vietnam, fought for this country; George Bush didn't -- and we lose the issue.

Second thing, we're not allowed to use George Bush's name at the Democratic Convention in Boston. Could not use his name. So how do you beat a guy if you can't even talk about him at your convention?

McNally: That was the word put out by the Kerry campaign ... Bush had shown such incompetence, and they wouldn't let anyone criticize ... ?

McAuliffe: Including me. The chairman of the party, that's your job.

And third, the day Bush said on the Today show that he couldn't win the war on terror. In the book, go through this one ad nauseam, which will sicken your stomach. How I tried to call John in Nantucket. "Get off the island. Go to Pennsylvania, where United 93 went down, and say, 'I'll win the war on terror.'"

Bush just said he couldn't win what was his only argument for reelection, and no one told John about it supposedly. And the press asks him, and he's out windsurfing. Huge mistake for us. Blown opportunity, Bush went out the next day, cleaned it up.

And one thing I'll never get over -- they had $15 million left in the bank on election day. Here I am at the party, having outraised the Republicans. I even secretly borrowed an extra $10 million the weekend before, just in case. And they were sitting on this money. For the life of me, I can't understand why.

McNally: Could that $15 million have made a difference in Ohio?

McAuliffe: Absolutely. Do you know what $15 million could do for turnout? The Kerry campaign was not doing any black radio two or three weeks before the campaign; they were not building up the grass roots. You could have done phone banking.

McNally: Would that have just made voters wait 12 hours instead of 10?

McAuliffe: In fairness, a couple of colleges had the 10-hour wait, but many places they didn't have to wait. We just had to increase the vote and change the vote. $15 million. People didn't give money for it to sit in a bank account after an election. I just can't get over it.

McNally: Two workers in Ohio were convicted of acting improperly with the regard to the recount. In Ohio, if someone asks for a recount, you count a few sample precincts. If they line up with the original vote, you don't have to recount the rest. These two locked the doors and cherry picked the precincts -- found some that aligned with the original vote, and put those out as the sample precincts. It should be front page news.

McAuliffe: I hadn't heard that. They ought to put them away for 100 years.

McNally: -- about page 17 of the L.A. Times.

You say that the reason for your work in politics is not just about raising the money or winning the elections, it's about making the American dream available to more Americans.

You also make the telling point that it's one thing to talk and write about politics. It's another thing to do politics, and you've been willing to get down and dirty and fight the fight.

You made enormous progress at the DNC -- in terms of developing a database, harnessing electronic media and raising money. Yet against a party and an administration that got very little right and some important things tragically wrong, Democrats lost in '02 and in '04. How did that happen?


McAuliffe: Pretty much 9/11. The 2002 election was all about the war on terror. It was too close to 9/11 and Bush very effectively -- with the White House and the bully pulpit -- scared the daylights out of voters.

I mean, they ran ads against Max Cleland in Georgia, you know, Max a triple amputee from Vietnam. They ran ads of him with Osama bin Laden, Saddam Hussein. But Max should have swung back.

Joe Lieberman came up with the idea of Homeland Security. They took the issue away from us and all of a sudden somehow, we're not patriotic 'cause we weren't supporting all the legislation the way the Republicans want it.

McNally: They put the vote up just before the election. They were forming Homeland Security, a former Democratic idea, but you couldn't unionize the workers.

McAuliffe: They were collapsing nine federal agencies into Homeland Security. So people who were going into this new agency wanted to take the benefits that they'd accrued working for the federal government. The bill said no, you're starting at Ground Zero. Well that was crazy, if you've worked for the federal government for 25 years ...

McNally: It was a set up. That's only fair to people who've worked all their lives.

McAuliffe: So that was 2002.

2004 we should have won. I mean we won a lot of elections around the country. I talked about a few things that John did. He also did a lot of things right, but you know he had some bad breaks. I mean six days before the election Osama bin Laden did the video -- which I knew was going to happen -- and he talked about red states, blue states ... This guy knew more about American politics than many Americans.

And it scared the daylights out of people. The swing voters we had we lost overnight. The problem was, John did not establish the basis that he was keeping us safer than George Bush. And when John said, "I actually did vote for the $87 billion [October 2003 supplemental funding bill for U.S. troops in Iraq and Afghanistan] before I voted against it," we lost our foundation.

So 2004 I can explain very easily. Never has another party beaten an incumbent president in a time of of war, but these were extraordinary circumstances. We should have beaten him by ten points.

McNally: The team of Bush and Rove are electoral savants -- good at demonizing and defining opponents, winning elections, but with no inclination to govern.

McAuliffe: John Kerry came to my office on March 10th, sat with me for an hour one on one: "Terry what are you worried about?" I said, "John, they're going to come at you hard," and he said, "Terry, don't worry about it. They come at me, I'm going to go back at them harder."

McNally: When Bush and Cheney won -- not were elected, but won -- in 2000, I had the image of the 20th century reaching up out of the grave and saying not so fast, I'm not going without a fight. Gore's was to be the first 21st century administration, but it was stolen, and we end up with two oil guys in the White House. We've gone backwards the last six years -- on energy, on environment, corruption, war.

McAuliffe: Look what Enron did here. I started raising heck about that day one. We were all proven right. They manipulated your supply, your prices, look what they did to you folks out here in California. This administration was bought and paid for by the huge energy concerns, plain as day. They write an energy policy, and they don't want to tell you who's in the room with them. I mean, come on, this is democracy?

McNally: You're willing to fight like the Republicans, and you're able to raise money like them. What have you learned in the trenches about why your vision of an America that serves the people has been so difficult to achieve?

McAuliffe: What Hillary took on in 1993 -- and she's quoted all through my book -- she had no idea they'd come at her the way they did. They made it look like her plan was so complicated and you could not go to your own doctor. Her idea was, listen, let's make it universal healthcare, make it more affordable. Let's make it competitive.

At the time we had 32 million Americans with no health insurance, now we have 50. She was right. Did we go about it the wrong way? Yeah, probably. Tried to do too much too quick. Live and learn, I'd rather have somebody who made mistakes and gets up and does it again.

But you've got to understand there are very powerful interests in Washington who spend a lot of money lobbying. I hate these earmarks. Nancy Pelosi, God bless her, she said let's get rid of all the earmarks. I cannot say enough, how much I respect her for doing that. We need to clean up Washington.

McNally: What if money is the obstacle? What if the way we finance politics no longer serves your reason for doing politics? Everyone points to the Kennedy-Nixon debate as the dawn of the age of television. A few elections later began the even more influential age of television ads -- and the cost of campaigns skyrocketed. What if the price of democracy has become too high for the average American to afford?

You're a great salesman. How would you sell public financing of elections?


McAuliffe: I don't take any pay for this ... I'd love it if I didn't have to raise anymore money. I think the public financing system we have today is absolutely broken, there are so many holes in it.

McNally: The system where you check off a box on your tax return. In 2004 the lead candidates said they wouldn't take it in the primaries. Hillary's already said she's not taking it in the primaries or the general, and people say any candidate who's going to run seriously is going to have to do the same ...

McAuliffe: You can only give at the most $2,100 to Hillary or any of the candidates. Or twice, $4,200. But on the outside there are all these independent groups, 527's, who literally spend zillions of dollars. The Swift Boat campaign was a 527. There's no control, they can say whatever they want. So unless you shut the 527's down, it sort of defeats the whole purpose.

McNally: What about real public financing? The kind of system that's in place in Vermont, Maine, Arizona? I've said since the 2004 election that people may care about the environment or healthcare or anything, but if we focused on getting public financing of elections, then we'd have a chance to pass things for the average Joe you talk about.

McAuliffe: It's really not the campaigns that you're beholden to, because nobody can give more than $2,100. We've really got to raise most of our money through the Internet and small donors. The big distinction is the lobbyists and the lobbied interests.

I wish you'd get rid of all of it, I couldn't agree with you more. We raise all this money to go on television and do these ads which I don't think anyone's paying attention to, now with TiVo and everything else.

McNally: And the money channels right through. You take it from a corporate donor, you pay for a television commercial, you go on television and it's gone.

So you would be for public financing?


McAuliffe: Sure. I have never lobbied. I'm not into that game up there on Capitol Hill, but I know enough of what goes on. These people need to raise money to run their ads and all that. Lobbyists raising a lot of money, it's how the system works. If you can get rid of all that -- I would love a shortened season, the way England does it, I think it's terrific. And give people equal access to television. I would love debates where people actually get to ask questions. I think the debates are the best part of the whole presidential process.

McNally: So you're for free TV, real debates, and shorter campaigns. Of course, this is going to be the longest one yet.

McAuliffe: It's going to be the longest general election, 'cause the primaries will be over on Feb. 5th, unfortunately.

McNally: If Hillary gets elected, would you devote yourself to passing public financing?

McAuliffe: You think these candidates enjoy this? They hate it. I can't get Hillary to make a money call; she hates it. Every candidate hates it. Bill Clinton never would make a call in his life. And when you're in the House and Senate, you've got to go to these fundraisers every night. It stinks.

Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: democrats, hillary clinton, terry mcauliffe, dnc

Interviewer Terrence McNally hosts Free Forum on KPFK 90.7FM, Los Angeles (streaming at kpfk.org).

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
How intriguing...
Posted by: anothername on Feb 27, 2007 4:29 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
So Terry is writing his version of history, how interesting. There were some people who knew John Kerry could not campaign, based on his campaigns in Massachusetts. If Terry had not pushed the primaries forward in 2004 so that John won the numbers for the nomination very early, John very possibly would have burnt out sometime during the primaries and the Democrats would have been left with a stronger candidate.

Now, I have been wondering how much Terry has a hand in urging the various states to front-load the primaries and caucuses in 2008 to get Hillary elected, which also might get us Barack as the candidate. Certainly the states have grumbled about late primaries for decades, but this year they seem to be posed to do something about it.

Several independent (non-party-leadership) Democrats were also telling the Kerry campaign that he was not reaching the people who would be voting. Those individuals were ignored by the campaign, too.

Now, in 2007, I see the exact same problems of 2003 and 2004. Issues are being ignored, Democrats are salivating at the thought of so much distrust associated with Republicans that anyone they nominate will win, and candidates are being hyped by the media. The day after the election in 2004, numerous Democrats hit their hands on their heads and realized they should have been talking about issues, not just bashing Bush. Alas, that lesson, too, seems to have been forgotten.

We need the long primary season to discuss issues. By the time a candidate makes a statement, a reporter slips it into a news item, the article is aired or printed, the public reads it, people write letters in response, those are printed, then read, then responded to, then eventually turned into a question asked of a candidate at a town hall meeting, a month may have passed. Then the process needs to be repeated until the topic is discussed enough to air all consequences and begin to reach some consensus among the people who are the government.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: How intriguing... Posted by: Frenchman
Just get private money out of federal elections
Posted by: Moonray on Feb 27, 2007 4:50 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Terry McAuliffe is so mired in the details of politics that he doesn't see the bigger problem: Private money has so corrupted our system that our country's future is seriously endangered. Incompetents like those who run the Bush administration can simply buy their way into office, and no doubt will continue to do so.

Congressional and presidential campaigns should be limited by law to 60 days, at most. No private money. Radio and TV stations, even cable stations, should be required to donate a certain amount of air time -- very little -- to campaign messages.

It would require a constitutional amendment, but we need to do it. The corruption gets worse every year, and the rest of the world is pulling ahead of us in almost every way.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Dems gotta get dirty
Posted by: Ellie1 on Feb 27, 2007 5:27 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I remember a discussion with a liberal friend before GWB was first selected. She told me we Democrats should not stoop to the low level the Republicans were fighting at. Well we didn't and we lost-twice. I was VERY upset when Kerry didn't fight back, didn't respond immediately. The Repukes can get elected, they just can't govern. Dems can govern, we just can't get elected. Hope we have learned a lesson-at our country's peril.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The Private Money of the Healthcare Industry will Boggle Your Mind
Posted by: michaeltwatson on Feb 27, 2007 5:35 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
While McAuliffe acknowledges the influence of private money in public policy, one thing that we will all face after the 2008 election is a flood of money from the private side of the healthcare industry. Almost every candidate (even the non-candidate GWB) is now talking about some means of making healthcare more affordable. Whether it is those advocating universal coverage, tax policy changes, new safety and efficiency measures, or changes in public subsidy, it is certain that there will be one major factor in the shaping of policy. That factor is the influence of the private for-profit healthcare entities. These mega-business hospitals, insurance companies, conglomerate doctor groups and manufacturers of medical devices and drugs, will all have lobbyists swarming around DC even more than they have in recent years. The money is already pooring into the lobbyists who are trying to get the ears of the major candidates to shape their views and voices on how to change the system. What we need to do is listen carefully to the proposals, determine who they will benefit and who they will hurt, and not lose sight of the money trail. Every bill that goes to a Congressional committee will have some harmful effect on the average healthcare consumer. It will be our job to find out what the hidden language says and call it to the public attention. Michael Townes Watson, author of America's Tunnel Vision--How Insurance Companies' Propaganda Is Corrupting Medicine and Law. www.StopMedicalError.com.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

demagogues and democrats
Posted by: beltane on Feb 27, 2007 5:41 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I agree with the posts above re: public financing and primary scheduling. Those are the two big issues the Dems need to address, indeed our whole country needs to address.

On a snarkier note, the Dems also need to address the issue of McAuliffe himself, and his employer. It was recently reported that McAuliffe warned Obama supporters that Pres. Hillary "would remember those who didn't support her. You're either with us or against us." That's exactly the kind of bellicose rhetoric that cost the US the good will of the world when Bush said it, and has cost Hillary the goodwill of many Dems when her mouthpiece said it.

I realize it takes a huge ego to even consider running for Pres., or running a campaign for Pres. But these politicians and their minions have gotten so bad that they are trippping over their own egos. Maybe we should just draft someone every four years to serve as our little demi-king. After all, there's a good arguent to be made that the only good president we ever had was the first one, because he didn't want the job.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Can you spot a LOSER when you see one?
Posted by: edsmith on Feb 27, 2007 5:58 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Terry, the DNC, the DLC, - I'm glad he's working for Billery.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

How?
Posted by: Lincoln fan on Feb 27, 2007 6:32 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
You're a great salesman. How would you sell public financing of elections?

McAuliffe: I don't take any pay for this ... I'd love it if I didn't have to raise any more money. I think the public financing system we have today is absolutely broken, there are so many holes in it.


Why won't politicians answer questions?
Bob Reichenbach,
Director, The Lincoln Initiative

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

What a waste
Posted by: mark_proulx on Feb 27, 2007 6:55 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Terry McAuliffe advocating public financing? Right. What next? He adopts Jesus Christ as his personal savior? Why doesn't this corporate tool hang it up so that he can "spend more time with his family?"

What a waste of bandwidth.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Hard To Swallow
Posted by: NoPCZone on Feb 27, 2007 7:00 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The part about him, as DNC Chair being unable to speak his mind at the 2004 Convention seems more than a little fishy to me. If he was told , as he claims, to not mention BushCo; he could have told them to eat sh*t and die. As DNC Chair- he can do pretty much what he wants to. I'm not buying that part of his story.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The Real Problem
Posted by: StuartH on Feb 27, 2007 7:12 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This guy was part of a strategy which hitched the Democratic Party to the corporate bandwagon and evicted people like Jim Hightower out. Dean was essentially railroaded out for being a real grassroots candidate by the DNC and DLC powers that be inside the beltway. They would rather lose an election than elect a real progressive champion. As elitists, they are rather frightened of such people. They don't really understand what is at stake and think incrementalism and business as usual is enough.

This nomination process will first and foremost, be a fight between the populist oriented, grassroots progressives and the corporate money worshippers within the Democratic Party.

For the sake of the country and the future of the planet, I hope that the progressives gain a foothold.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: The Real Problem Posted by: Lincoln fan
» RE: The Real Problem Posted by: MartianBachelor
Mr. $pin
Posted by: Naomi on Feb 27, 2007 7:23 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Terry has been doing the liberal media tour over the last few weeks. Its totally sickening hearing Mr Corporation himself talk about how great Bill and Hillary are.

The Dems need to eviserate the DLC from the party if they ever hope to remotely appear to be representing the people.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

mr. worthless
Posted by: schnoggi on Feb 27, 2007 7:47 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
a quick scan of the comments tells me i made the right decision in not even bothering to read what this king of hacks has to say. if you have so much vision how about you do something useful with your time, say, anything EXCEPT work to elect that horrible man in a dress you are flogging.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

What a War Party
Posted by: ScottP on Feb 27, 2007 8:30 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Isn't that nice that he works for a war monger? Isn't life so much fun in war time?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Donations...
Posted by: bassman on Feb 27, 2007 9:06 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I have written to the Democratic National Council that, until Hillary Clinton drops out of the race for President, they can forget about any money from me. Why is she qualified to be president again? Oh, yeah, she was married to one. ALL RISE AND PAY RESPECTS TO HER MAJESTY QUEEN HILLARY, HIER TO THE THRONE IN THESE ROYAL STATES OF CLINTONBUSHMERICA.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Donations... Posted by: Lincoln fan
message for Terry
Posted by: kelt65 on Feb 27, 2007 9:24 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Please, take Hillary and just go away. Just kill yourselves, please.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: message for Terry Posted by: corylus
Sorry to rain on the Terry-Terrence love-fest, but...
Posted by: eddie torres on Feb 27, 2007 9:45 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Terry: WHO told Al Gore's and John Kerry's campaign teams to STOP demanding accurate vote counts in Florida and Ohio and STOP challenging the US Supreme Court election ruling in 2000? Or was it, perhaps, a money issue?

Gee Terry, you're the best campaign weapon the Dems have: "...one thing I'll never get over -- they had $15 million left in the bank on election day. Here I am at the party, having outraised the Republicans. I even secretly borrowed an extra $10 million the weekend before, just in case. And they were sitting on this money. For the life of me, I can't understand why."

Perhaps... just perhaps... it was cash for lawyers to rush to state election certification boards to lobby in favour of Republican-friendly vote counts? Perhaps?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Democratic Elections
Posted by: Redhead5050 on Feb 27, 2007 10:56 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The only way to open the election process to future intelligent, competent, visionary leaders is to take the money out of the equasion. Further, any adult will have some undesirable history at some point in their life...weather they smoked pot in college, had family problems or work problems. Where would we get the immaculately clean adult who could run without being demonized for some teenage indescretion. Who would want to run a campaign and be eviscerated publicly? And then only if you can raise a ton of cash will you be considered for this barrage of personal attacks.

A good deal must be changed before we can encourage good people to step up and lead. We need publicly financed elections along with the shortened 90 day "election season" and we need to focus on issues and solutions.

No wonder so many American citizens feel that their vote does not count...that they are totally disenfranchised and will never have a voice or a piece of the American Dream. So sad what this Amerika has come to be....sad indeed.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Democratic Elections Posted by: Lauren
Was This Interview Recorded While DRUNK?!?
Posted by: grumble-bum on Feb 27, 2007 4:49 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What an incoherent, rambling mess.

Here we have a guy who is apparently practically at the top of his party's power structure & yet spends the entire interview answering questions (when he even actually directly anwers them, that is) by saying things like "I can't believe [they] wouldn't let us talk about...", or "he shoulda hit back", etc. Who wouldn't let you? Who shoulda-woulda-coulda?

You should have talked about that shit, & you should have fought back, Mr. Drunken Irishman (I can say this as a Drunken Irishman, Reformed)!!! How a man who was flippin' chairman of the Democratic Party thinks he can get away with this scattershot blame-game is beyond me.

Except, Jeez, maybe the hapless, pathetic Democratic pResidential campaigns of the last two go-arounds really were actually my fault... Oh, Lord... I'm so sorry!

& that all these rambling attempts at avoiding blame while seemingly talking populism (sorta) are coming from a man working for the most bankrolled & corporately beholden of the Democratic candidates for '08, well, it's almost enough to drive me to drink.

Disgusting.

Although I do want to know more about his charming childhood tarring business... What grade of tar goes best with feathers?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Why Listen to a Loser?
Posted by: corylus on Feb 27, 2007 10:00 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
McAuliffe demonstrated one thing to me over the past 10 years, and that's the fact that he and the rest of the Democratic National Committee are so far out of touch with the needs of Americans (to say nothing of the oppressed in other nations with whom we have more in common than the likes of political sycophants like McAuliffe). I communicated several times with McAuliffe during the 2000 election about not demonizing Ralph Nader (who's been proven a better and more honest analyst of American foreign and domestic policy than any Democrat I've ever read or heard, to say nothing of his decades of advocacy for American citizens), to develop the Gore platforms more progressive elements, and distance the Democratic Party from the warmongering, un-American platform of the Republicans, yet the Dems outdid the Republicans on adopting an especially regressive, reactionary platform, lost the election (it never should have come down to Florida), then failed to mount the clearly justified legal challenge for the one of the 2 most corrupt presidential elections ever in this country. The DNC then built on its record of betraying the American people by caving in even further to fear, racism, and jingoism in 2004. Does anyone really think the warmongering, Palistinian-murderess Clinton will change the face of American to the world, or even to those disenfranchised by a fascist political system? If you do, then you're a completely ignorant dupe: Democrats and Republicans are from the same mold and have no intention of letting the vast majority of Americans achieve their version of "the dream"! Political hacks and traitors to the causes of working class and impoverished Americans like McAuliffe should rot in hell, not be aggrandized for their cowardice and capitulation to corporate, imperial America. Overprivileged, arrogant blowhards deserve public humiliation, not the most foul of flatulence in print!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement