Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
100 words for 100 days: submit your 100 word essay and get published on AlterNet
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Black America After Jim Crow: Still Feels Like Segregation

By Yvonne Bynoe, AlterNet. Posted February 27, 2007.


Instead of recognizing Black achievements throughout the year, why do we still cram everything "Black" into one month? And what does that say about how race influences the types of politicians that American voters select?

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

More stories by Yvonne Bynoe

Get AlterNet in
your mailbox!

 
Advertisement

February is almost over which also means the end of Black History month. Call me a grouch, but as far I am concerned, Black History month is an annual reminder that Black folks are still not considered part of the American mainstream. It seems that rather than integrate the accomplishments of Black Americans into events, school curricula and advertisements throughout the year, the preference is still to cram everything "Black" into February.

When March comes around, schools, television networks and corporations can let out a sigh of relief that they don't have to deal with Black folks until next year. One has to wonder, since Black people -- like Latinos and Asians -- only warrant one month of recognition, how does race continue to influence the types of politicians that American voters select?

The country is currently abuzz about the presidential candidacy of Senator Barack Obama. Obama is not the first Black American to run for president, but he is the first one born after the Supreme Court's historic ruling in Brown v. Board of Education (1954) that struck down the legal doctrine of "separate but equal." The 45-year-old Obama, like 36-year-old Washington, D.C. mayor Adrian Fenty and 37-year-old Newark, New Jersey mayor Cory Booker represent the first generation of Black Americans leaders born after the end of segregation.

This is relevant because, unlike their elders, their world view has not been entirely shaped by racial barriers. It makes headlines to categorize the ascension of these young politicians as a seismic shift in Black leadership, when, in fact, the new turks are merely emblematic of a natural evolution -- the realization of the hopes of the civil rights movement.

Civil rights activists knew that the ability of young Black Americans to excel in our society was not based solely on their intellect or personal drive but also on a range of opportunities being opened up to them. In practical terms this meant that young Black Americans needed to have the chance to live in safe, culturally rich communities and have access to the type of education and employment that had been reserved for White Americans.

The emergence of a coterie of young Black leaders such as Obama, Fenty, and Booker does not connote the obsolescence of the civil rights initiatives. However, they are forcing all Americans to contemplate the next chapter in our collective history.

Black Americans have to ask themselves what does it mean to be "Black" in a multi-racial society outside the context of slavery or Jim Crow? Do middle- and upper-income Black Americans really have the same political and economic interests as low-income Blacks? And all Americans have to ask, how does the public discourse on Blackness in the United States need to change to include African and Caribbean immigrants?

In recent days, various Black commentators have been stepping all over each other to proclaim that Obama is not "Black." Obama is the son of a White mother from Kansas and a Black father from Kenya, so the canard is that he does not share their cultural background.

Historically, because of the "one-drop" rule, significant numbers of bi-racial children have identified themselves as Black. Ironically, the fact that Washington, D.C. mayor Adrian Fenty's mother is White has not made a ripple -- maybe because his father is a native Black American.

Despite the narrow perspectives, "Black America" has always been ethnically diverse. Caribbeans have been part of the Black American dialogue for many decades. American Blacks and Caribbean immigrants usually live near each other and frequently intermarry. Rep. Shirley Chisholm (D-NY), the first Black woman to run for President, was an immigrant from Jamaica, West Indies. The presence of Ethiopian restaurants on the U Street corridor in Washington, D.C. and the increasing number of African-owned businesses opening in traditionally Black American communities across the nation attest to the growing influence of African immigrants.

What has not occurred are frank and candid conversations between native Black Americans and immigrants from Africa and the Caribbean that aim to update the public face of "Black America." These dialogues would first need to acknowledge the unique cultures and histories of the various groups, while forging relationships based on our shared interests and challenges in this country as people of African descent.

Despite the controversies that surround it, Hip Hop culture exemplifies the actual melding of Black ethnicities. Many Hip Hop luminaries, including two of its founding fathers, DJ Kool Herc and Grandmaster Flash are of Caribbean descent. Moreover, popular rap artist, Akon, who has worked with artists as such as Grammy winner Chamillionaire and Snoop Dogg, was born in Dakar, Senegal.


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: obama, black history month

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Barack Obama is
Posted by: jwc on Feb 27, 2007 2:23 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
running for president of the American people. Not just black Americans. It seems that many in the media forget that point whenever they mention him.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Barack Obama is Posted by: ALANHESTER
Multicolored Bunglers
Posted by: edith on Feb 27, 2007 2:29 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If white(he's as "white" as he is "black") leader obama("African leader Obama?") does not convince us that he will be a capable CEO capable of dealing with financial bankruptcy of the US, loss of its job base and taking on the military industrial complex, then I say dig up the late great James Brown. JB would be as an effective "leader" as Obama, and a lot more "black". Having said that, who cares what Obama's background is. Whether he can run anything larger than the well financed Harvard Law Review is a question perhaps only he can answer. W has proved that not any fool can should be President, regardless of ideology or political positions.

The voters are a board of directors hiring a major CEO. Aside from Romney, who hasn't met a controversial position he doesn't want to flip on, most of the leading candidates have run anything bigger than an office staff w/ a couple of exceptions.

Bill Richardson:former NM Governor and Cabinet officer. Kucinich "ran" Cleveland, or at least tried to as the power company fought him all the way; Giuliani "ran" NY, but all 9/11 showed was how dysfuntional his administration was in an emergency. A tough campaign may well uncover how corrupt the Giuliani administration was as well. And is Hilary really going to show us how she helped "run" the administratively- challenged Clinton administration?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Where's White History Month?
Posted by: kepstein7777 on Feb 27, 2007 3:59 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I know...Every month is White History Month.

BHM seems very patronizing. Lots of cheesy stuff on PBS...Plus, every minority group will want a month. What happens when we run out of months?

Not a bad article. A good basis for a long discussion that will go round in circles.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Where's White History Month? Posted by: ALANHESTER
How about no month for anyone?
Posted by: edsmith on Feb 27, 2007 6:10 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Blacks make up about 12% of the population so a month of Black is about right. I'm just not loking forward to Hispanic Month 1/2. Or Asian week for that matter. Nut soon they will come. Maybe on day we can split the year in two and alternate Whit Month with another month. The Blacks, Hispanics, Asians, Eskimos, and the rest can take turns.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Barack's Experience
Posted by: jasonkli on Feb 27, 2007 6:47 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It's a complete lie that Barack doesn't have enough experience. He worked at the grassroots level with group of Churches in Chicago doing organizing and his wife was a founding member of a Chicago non-profit. He's got the same amount of experience as Abraham Lincoln and JFK did before they became president, both president's I wouldn't mind having right now. He has enough foreign policy experience to know that invading Iraq was a bad idea, unlike Hillary. He is a self made man that has worked his way up to the top of American society without wealthy parents or a famous spouse.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Obama is a fraud. Posted by: neptune
Everyone thinks its funny and its not accomplishing much, if
Posted by: albrechtkrausse on Feb 27, 2007 6:54 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
anything. I recall examining a relative's school textbook and laughing. It was apparent that the book was written with the politically correct message as the primary motivation, not history or education. Each 'minority' such as blacks or women has a little corner of the page where some 'innovation or contribution' was listed. Instead of treating any innovation into the totality of history there were singled out. Like "look white children a black contributed something"!! Many were tenuous or not in keeping with the subject being studied so they seemed more out of place. It shouldn't be considered a 'surprise' that a women or a black did something important, invented something, etc. Why not put them in the history like anyone else instead of making it a 'surprise'? In fact, most white kids laugh at the books and it reinforces the idea that 'most' blacks did nothing since the only guy they read about during 100yrs of history is a special blurb about "George Washington Carver inventing the peanut"!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Correction Posted by: Lesha
Folks, it's ALWAYS a good time to feel good about yourself.
Posted by: ABetterFuture on Feb 27, 2007 7:25 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Instead of recognizing Black achievements throughout the year, why do we still cram everything "Black" into one month?

Answer? Don't! Celebrate who you are everyday! A "special month" doesn't matter one iota--we are all exceptional, all the time.

Just look at those opposable thumbs!

Those steroscopic eyes!

That big, beautiful brain, capable of compassion, capable of empathy, capable of self-awareness!

Look at those marvelous things...and don't look so much toward a silly thing like skin pigmentation.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Dagnabbit. Posted by: ABetterFuture
Community Activist
Posted by: wwahid on Feb 27, 2007 8:29 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It should be remembered that middle class blacks were a creation of white men who fathered black children. the chldren were set aside from their darker skin siblings and others. a major tenant of white supremacy is color and the lighter the better. middle class black children of white males were given opportunities that other blacks did not enjoy (land, opportunity to learn to read, and most important-close proximity and assimilation into white supremacist culture). there were black harvard graduates at the turn of the century(does anyone remember du bois and relatives of blanche k bruce). denmark vessey took forever trying to get mulattoes of south carolina interested in ending slavery because the mulattoes would havelost their privilege positions with ending of slavery. and most recent check about the tuskegee story of black discrimination against blacks ino order to mingle in white society. the story of blanche k bruce is typical of blacks that rose to fame and fortune in america. so my point is that there has been and is still a race of blacks (coloreds- the same as south african coloreds) that set the standard for the black middle class. and their political alignment is support of their mostly white fathers.

william

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Community Activist Posted by: sailor50
» RE: Community Activist Posted by: LexMuslimah
A first black President
Posted by: 1koolkat on Feb 27, 2007 9:03 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I certainly hope that anyone who believes that it is time for the U.S. to seriously consider a black candidate for President of the U.S., would not withhold their vote because they do not feel that Obama is black enough. The first hurdle is to get a first black President, I cannot imagine why anyone would disagree with that, unless they feel their should never be consideration of a black President.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Don't you think it would be better... Posted by: ABetterFuture
Obama: Too Black...or not Black Enough?
Posted by: LexMuslimah on Feb 27, 2007 9:32 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Over the past few weeks I have read or heard that Obama is "too black," or "not black enough." It also seems that black America has finally found a critical voice. The criticism? Obama is "upper middle class and Ivy league." Huh?

As a child of the sixties and former black panther and former member of the NOI--I'm confused. I thought the struggle was all about opening up opportunities to education and wealth. (In the words of Br. James: "I don't want nobody to give me nothing...open up the door and I'll get it myself"). Do we really want to continue to perpetuate the stereotype that being black means being uneducated and poor???

And, why is the Black community holding Obama to standards to which we never held present or past administrations? We have got to stop thinking we have to own Obama to support his candidacy. The real issue for Obama is--as it should be for Hillary, Edwards, Bidden, etc.--Where do you stand on issues of social and economic justice for all Americans? Where are you on foreign policy issues... education... jobs... health care... the economy? Implicit in these questions is: "Where do you stand on the issues that confront Black America?" An issue on which Obama's history exonerates him. (Read his first book--"Dreams of My Father"--his "real" book in which we get an "unpolished" snap shot of his soul and the experiences that shaped him.) Obama chose to work in the African American community and was in no way divorced from the feelings and desires of the people he worked with and for--quite the opposite--he was passionately involved and dedicated. On another note--look at his record in Illinois--is there anything that says he will not take the interests of all citizens into account?

I think what we, as Black Americans--as American in general--can be most proud of and hopeful about is that Obama is a universal man. His background and experiences give him the ability to understand the needs of and empathize with all Americans; and also enable him to communicate with the world community to build and rebuild friendships and alliances for the American people. It is time for healing on so many levels, and Obama is the man for this time. We deserve a president that represents all of America. This is what we fought for, and this is what we've earned.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Can this be correct?
Posted by: WhatNow? on Feb 27, 2007 10:53 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"Rep. Shirley Chisholm (D-NY), the first Black woman to run for President, was an immigrant from Jamaica, West Indies."

Where did she run for president? I thought you had to be born in the US to be president here.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» You are Correct But Posted by: edith
EFFICACY
Posted by: efficacy on Feb 27, 2007 11:05 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I am waiting for just one black leader to attack this insane "war on drugs". After all 10 percent of the African American population is in the criminal justice system.(probation,halfway houses,parole,jail or prison) Seventy percent of them are there for drug related charges. No one and I mean no one is talking about this modern day slavery. What's up with that?? I know its all about the money.
Efficacy@msn.com

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: EFFICACY Posted by: pure_genius
» RE: FFICACY Posted by: efficacy
Historical differences
Posted by: pure_genius on Feb 27, 2007 12:18 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The writer makes a clear implication. Many of the problems arise from socio-economic class. In America, a rich or wealthy ethnic minority will be treated differently than one who is not. This problem is obviously not exclusive to people of color. Poor whites experience many of the same problems as poor blacks. The major exception being found in the incarceration rate. Jim Crow was blatant, but modern institutionalized racism and classism are far more subtle. In the pre-Brown South, crimes that were believed to be committed more by blacks than whites carried stiffer penalties. This notion still exists in the drug provision of the Higher Education Act. Strong activism against it has led to revision of it, but it still discriminates against the poor and people of color.

The great equalizer in a viciously capitalistic nation like America is not education or skin color. It is simply money.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

How Black do you have to be?
Posted by: lbrantley on Feb 27, 2007 12:31 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I am so sick and tired of the "spin masters" and the b#ll that comes out of the mouths..Obama just might be the right guy for the job! As for the 24.9% of blacks that live marginally on the poverty line and do not support Obama "don't vote or can't vote" so, why are their voices given any air time? America is still a "racist" country and by some strange twist of fate, Black Americans are still numb to the fact. The world out side of the US is fully aware that if you are a person of color you will be treated as a "second class citizen in USA"..I will vote for Obama but I can't speak for the"Uncle Toms"..the white man's black talking head!!

lee--Tampa, fl

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: How Black do you have to be? Posted by: underground
Self Imposed Apartheid
Posted by: NoPCZone on Feb 27, 2007 4:30 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We still have a Miss Black America, Miss Black (fill in the blank) State, Miss Black University of (fill in the blank), Black Entertainment Television, United Negro College Fund, traditionally black Colleges, Universities and Medical Schools, etc. At this late date, should that really be the case?

We live in a country where Americans of African descent have served as Senators, Representatives, State Senators, State Representatives, Governors, Mayors, Sheriffs, City Managers, Secretaries of State and other executive agencies, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Supreme Court Justices, CEOs of some of our largest corporations, Professional Sports Owners & Coaches, University Presidents and on and on and on. The fact that there is a division between members of our nation's Black community is now defined more as an issue of poverty than one of color.

The primary determinant in our nation and society these days is color, but not race. The color that is the dividing line is GREEN. Regardless of racial or ethnic background, family wealth is more of a determinant of success in the US than ANY OTHER FACTOR by far. A close second is networking or it's older name- the good old boy network. Knowing the right people and getting the right introductions goes a long way at critical points of educational access, internships, entry level jobs in the best firms, etc.

Just because a person is disadvantaged AND of color does not necessarily mean that race or ethnicity is the primary culprit. Many times it is just as common in a similar sized sample of people of similar economic and educational background and opportunity. What I am saying is that race might be the main factor, but is sometimes confused despite evidence to the contrary. The best antidote to the legacy of racism and Jim Crow is a universally accessible quality education, healthcare and housing. Then the primary limit is the ambition and talents of the individual person- not someone else's prejudice or generosity.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

a small opinion on this subject
Posted by: underground on Feb 27, 2007 11:15 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
as a white man, i believe it is definitely harder for black people to "get ahead" in america, so even though black history month may be a clumsy way to address this, i think it should be remembered. i try to let my black co-worker's sons know they matter and are important to me.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Intergration is an illusion
Posted by: Lesha on Feb 28, 2007 9:24 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The hidden meaning behind integration was that white folks were telling us that we can have access to the market, but instead of using it to empower ourselves, we foolishly empowered other people along with strengthening their communities instead of our own. Blacks in their apathy and self hatred on many fronts from physical violence to their ideas of beauty, are a result of a generation that missed the chance to eradicate the mis-guidance/brainwashing of our former slave masters.

Integration represents a form of confusion shared by most blacks because they don't identify with themselves but rather with other people especially whites. Asians, Whites ( English or Latinos), Middle Easterners, and Indians all have their own communities and believe me when I say they want to keep it that way and have no desire to integrate with blacks on any level. Just because these people may show their teeth and smile at you don't mean that their prospective group wants integrate with you. Other groups like Koreans and Arabs own businesses in black neighborhoods but you best believe they don't want to live among you. These people will take your money and that's it. Even Latinos with all the problem they have don't want to integrate with blacks. In some cases these people will shoot blacks to get them to leave their so-called neighborhoods ( just ask those who live in Harbor City in Los Angeles and elsewhere).

On Obama

The Civil Rights movement is a myth at best and just because they may consider a black man ( Mix black man) to be President, this is just a smoke screen. No white man will ever allow a black man to rule his land wither he be jet black or light skin, you can forget it. This hype is just to get blacks excited for nothing but on the other hand even if Obama somehow becomes President, his allegiance is to his master and his not people. If white America allows a black man to become President, it is because they know this country is about to sink. The white man is like the captain of a ship who knows that it is filled with with holes and is about to sink. He will allow you to be the captain of that ship because he knows you will die to save it rather than get a boat of your own to captain.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Intergration is an illusion Posted by: underground
» RE: Intergration is an illusion Posted by: underground
» RE: Intergration is an illusion Posted by: ALANHESTER
» RE: Intergration is an illusion Posted by: LexMuslimah
Really
Posted by: FightTheGiant on Feb 28, 2007 10:41 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Does a poor white "country bumpkin" have any greater chance of winning a presidential race as a poor "urban" black person, or a poor latin person? No. Money and the ability to communicate with the population as a whole really wins the presidency. Whether people like to admit it or not "white" is the majority in America. That is changing, but inorder to become the president you must get the majority of the votes (except if your last name is Bush). Therefore a presidential canidate must identify with the majority while also aiding the minority. Obama becoming President will allow people of darker color to be more widely accepted and allow them to take advantage of more opportunities. He may seem to be selling out but he is a smart man and I believe he will remember his roots. You have to play the game to win.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Segregation is a state of mind, it is an attitude
Posted by: cinattra on Feb 28, 2007 4:36 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This flak about Obama not being black enough because his father is African and not African-American is just because there is nothing else to talk about.

Not all of us had descendants that wore chains. Are we going to start house negro vs field negro and north negro vs south negro?

All this crap is just ridiculous. We segregate ourselves.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

FBUSH
Posted by: FBUSH on Feb 28, 2007 7:40 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Is it me or are blacks more racist towards blacks than any other racial group today. Im black (and white) and I dont look at the candidates as racial represenitives. Why is it that blacks feel that everyone of color must justify their "blackness?"

America is in a bad situation. The borders lack security. The war in Iraq has drained us. We have no credibility in the world. And the economy is shakey. Yet here we are nearing our own NATIONAL election with the opportunity to elect an effective leader for our country- yet were bickering about race.
Since by black standards I have no right to identify as black ( except for the census so the NAACP can recieve gov. funding) I must point out that blacks are behaving childish and falling into the stereotypes which plague them. Enough with Obama's race. Let's hear his ideas. Is that Reasonable?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Stereotyping
Posted by: YogiBear on Mar 1, 2007 9:14 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Obama's candidacy also pushes White Americans' to re-evaluate their concepts about Black Americans. In short, what does this new generation of Black leadership mean for them? Specifically, under what set of conditions would they view a Black political aspirant as being capable of governing them? And is that the same criteria that they would apply to White office-seekers?

You mean some white Americans, don't you? Or are we all the same?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Lesha couldn't have got it more right...........
Posted by: ekipnrut on Mar 4, 2007 4:58 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
From Lesha 2/28/07 post : Integration is an Illusion
Integration represents a form of confusion shared by most blacks because they don't identify with themselves but rather with other people especially whites. Asians, Whites ( English or Latinos), Middle Easterners, and Indians all have their own communities and believe me when I say they want to keep it that way and have no desire to integrate with blacks on any level Just because these people may show their teeth and smile at you don't mean that their prospective group wants integrate with you. Other groups like Koreans and Arabs own businesses in black neighborhoods but you best believe they don't want to live among you. These people will take your money and that's it. Even Latinos with all the problem they have don't want to integrate with blacks. In some cases these people will shoot blacks to get them to leave their so-called neighborhoods ( just ask those who live in Harbor City in Los Angeles and elsewhere).
Integration represents a form of confusion shared by most blacks because they don't identify with themselves but rather with other people especially whites. Asians, Whites ( English or Latinos), Middle Easterners, and Indians all have their own communities and believe me when I say they want to keep it that way and have no desire to integrate with blacks on any level. Just because these people may show their teeth and smile at you don't mean that their prospective group wants integrate with you. Other groups like Koreans and Arabs own businesses in black neighborhoods but you best believe they don't want to live among you. These people will take your money and that's it. Even Latinos with all the problem they have don't want to integrate with blacks. In some cases these people will shoot blacks to get them to leave their so-called neighborhoods ( just ask those who live in Harbor City in Los Angeles and elsewhere).
Well Guess What Alternet readers:
REF1
And What happened ??
OKLAHOMA CITY (AP) - The Cherokee Nation voted this weekend* to revoke the citizenship of the descendants of people the Cherokee once owned as slaves was a blow to people who have relied on tribal benefits.
Charlene White, a descendant of freed Cherokee slaves who were adopted into the tribe in 1866 under a treaty with the U.S. government, wondered Sunday where she would now go for the glaucoma treatment she has received at a tribal hospital in Stilwell.
"I've got to go back to the doctor, but I don't know if I can go back to the clinic or if they're going to oust me right now," said White, 56, a disabled Tahlequah resident who lives on a fixed income.
In Saturday's special election, more than 76 percent of voters decided to amend the Cherokee Nation's constitution to remove the estimated 2,800 freedmen descendants from the tribal rolls, according to results posted Sunday on the tribe's Web site.
Marilyn Vann, president of the Descendants of Freedmen of the Five Civilized Tribes, said the election results undoubtedly will be challenged."We will pursue the legal remedies that are available to us to stop people from not only losing their voting rights, but to receiving medical care and other services to which they are entitled under law," Vann said Sunday.
"This is a fight for justice to stop these crimes against humanity." (* VOTE WAS ON 3/3/07)
==============
Google 2/10/2007 USA TODAY article:
Past and Future Collide in Fight
Over Cherokee Identity
For election info
Check the photo of the laid back smug white man Ohhh..sorry..that's Chief Chad!!!.. :o)
Moral of the story...God Bless the Child that's got His Own
(Billie Holiday circa 1946)..and Goddamn in Hell racist hypocrites of any color. (IMHO 2007)
___

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]