Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

The Jet Blue Blues

By Barbara Ehrenreich, AlterNet. Posted February 24, 2007.


Let’s face it, JetBlue and the rest of you: Anything more than three hours on the ground isn’t an airline delay, it’s a hostage situation.
Advertisement

The lucky JetBlue passengers were the ones whose flights were cancelled last week. They were fortunate enough to remain stranded in well-heated airports with restrooms and food courts. As for the unlucky ones, hundreds of them were trapped for as many as 10 hours in planes on the tarmac, with overflowing toilets, dwindling supplies of drinking water, and of course no food when the pretzels ran out. So far there have been no reports of cannibalism aboard immobilized JetBlue flights, but, with the company’s post-ice storm PR campaign in full swing, who knows?

I could do 10 hours on the tarmac, provided I had a sufficient supply of Xanax and protein bars. But with children? JetBlue’s CEO David Neeleman has nine of them. Would he dare risk a family vacation in the Caribbean if any of them are in the challenging 0 to 10 age range? According to CNN, parents on stranded planes were ripping up t-shirts to make diapers for their babies. And how many times can you read Curious George out loud anyway?

Neeleman has admitted to being “humiliated and mortified” by his company’s post-storm meltdown (one might wish that his status included “fired.”) But JetBlue’s outbreak of passenger abuse reflects larger problems in corporate America. One is a premium on youth at the expense of experience. According to Aero News, this may have had something to do with the company’s decision, shortly after the storm, to push planes off to the tarmac rather than canceling flights, as the older airlines did. JetBlue’s approach certainly succeeded in clearing some boarding areas of noisy, disgruntled passengers, but a stun gun might have been more humane.

“There’s a lot more gray hair at older airlines than there is at JetBlue,” Aero News quoted Tim Sieber, general manager of the Boyd Group, an aviation-consulting firm. But youth is part of JetBlue’s branding, even if it means having no one around who’s ever seen snow.

The other widespread problem is a simple shortage of employees. Since the late eighties, corporate America has pursued the beautiful dream of an employee-free company. Imagine: no payroll except for the top executives, no benefits to provide, and of course no unions! So the pattern has been that every time a company downsizes, its stock rises and its top managers drool over their burgeoning portfolios.

Since 9/11, the airlines in particular have been shedding employees like unwanted ballast, with predictable results. As the New York Times reports, there’s been an industry-wide “thinning of staff,” meaning that in bad weather, airlines often “do not have enough people…” Which might be OK if bad weather hadn’t become so routine that it’s crowding out all other news on CNN.

The budget airlines are especially skimpy when it comes to human employees. In late 2006, Neeleman announced plans to reduce its number of full-time employees per plane from 93 to 80. He should rethink that, since the major reason JetBlue couldn’t get back off the ground after the Valentine’s Day storm was that it lacks the personnel to connect crews to their flights. Pilots and flight attendants remained stuck in their hotels while passengers slept on airport floors.

Neeleman might also want to rethink the paltry passengers’ “bill of rights” JetBlue is offering as part of its effort to regain customer trust. What it’s missing is the crucial right to be freed from an airplane that isn’t going anywhere at all. According to a spokesman for the Air Transport Association, the industry’s major trade group, such a right would “impose[s] inflexible standards on a carrier's operations” -- just as laws against kidnapping place a terrible burden on ransom-seekers.

If I get stuck on the tarmac for more than three hours, I plan to use my cell phone to call Homeland Security. Let’s face it, JetBlue and the rest of you: Anything more than three hours on the ground isn’t an airline delay, it’s a hostage situation.

Digg!

See more stories tagged with: jet blue

Barbara Ehrenreich is the author of 13 books, most recently "Bait and Switch: The (Futile) Pursuit of the American Dream."

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Jet Blue is still better than other airlines
Posted by: edsmith on Feb 24, 2007 5:10 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
More leg room, tv to numb the brain while in flight, larger more comfortable seat rather than having to chafe against another passenger. And, most importantly, an option of snacks that include potato chips!
Unless you fly first class you can't expect much at all from any airline.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

It Is the Unions Stupid!
Posted by: nosylae on Feb 24, 2007 7:27 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What the airlines' CEO's aren't saying and what the author of this story and most of the public fails to realize is that there are union imposed hourly restrictions on airplane personnel.

Most flight attendants and airplane pilots want to be on the actual airplane - that's when they make they most hourly wages. Once they are actually, physically, on the plane the clock has started. Even if the plane does not "fly", the airplane personnel cannot physically be on a plane for more than X hours (I say X hours because I am not exactly sure of the hourly requirement - it could be 10 hours, it could be 20 hours) - union regs! Then they need a minimum of Y hours of rest before they can relieve the next crew.

That is the whole cause of delays and eventually cancellations. When the airline company pushes the plane back from the terminal, the clock starts. They crew wants to be on that plane as long as possible to get the max amount of money (wages). When their clock runs out, they come back to the gate and cannot leave again until they get their mandatory rest. And the customers get stranded by the cancellations this causes. Because if there wasn't another crew resting and waiting all ready to replace and relieve this crew - nobody is going nowhere anytime soon.

And no CEO will ever admit that and the media is too lazy to do any real reporting to find out the truth behind airline rules and regulations. If CEO really believed in "customer service" they would have suspended the regs and made the crews fly to get the paying customers on their way.

And believe me, I would have been off that plane way before 10 hours went by. Most people on airplanes today are sheeple - they do what they are told and believe they are "safer" for it. Nothing could be further from the truth. I would have started a riot or pulled the emergency windows open or something. I'd rather be in an interrogation room waiting for an attorney than in that sardine can with screaming poopie pants kids.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: It Is the Unions Stupid! Posted by: michaelispan
» RE: It Is the Unions Stupid! Posted by: jetskipper
» RE: It Is the Unions Stupid! Posted by: jetskipper
» RE: It Is the Unions Stupid! Posted by: jetskipper
Three Hours is too long
Posted by: delihut on Feb 24, 2007 7:41 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Even one hour on the tarmac is too long. Don't most Jet Blue planes have a back door that has stairs. Contact the tower, tell them to get police or whatever over to their plane and escort anyone who wants off back into the airport. It's just totally unreasonable. Airlines think because of the security, that once we are in an airport, we are theirs. Exhorbitant prices for food, snacks, etc., along with a customer service attitude that they don't care about us and it's a volatile mix.
Just another sign that we are becoming just like the countries we are overthrowing or getting ready to threaten with missles being planted near their borders...un-real. Belize anyone?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Point of information Posted by: jmoore
Make the Passengers BOR Legally Enforceable
Posted by: Jkid4x on Feb 24, 2007 7:53 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Congress ought to make the PBOR legally enforceable by the FAA. That'll make sure they're really honoring the passengers they supposed to serve.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

SFO to DFW in 23 hours
Posted by: veggiegrrrl on Feb 24, 2007 8:56 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Once, I was on an AA flight from SFO to DFW that ended up taking 23 hours. We flew 4 hours (plus circling) to DFW, couldn't land due to fog, flew 1 hour to San Antonio, circled one hour, landed to refuel, sat on the tarmac 6 hours, tried to fly back to DFW, couldn't land, flew to Austin and spent 8 hours in Austin airport....finally flew back to DFW ...

If the airlines had a CLUE, they could have bussed everyone or paid for rental cars for everyone to DRIVE to Dallas.
Absurd.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The law should be...anything over 1 hour locked inside on the ground
Posted by: veggiegrrrl on Feb 24, 2007 9:00 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The law should be...anything over 1 hour locked inside on the ground....and the doors should be opened and passengers escorted from the tarmac (full of workers and police anyway...no biggie) to the terminal.

If the luggage can't get pulled off, SO WHAT. We're supposed to have our valuables/necessities as carry on.

Cancel my flights anyday. Just don't leave me trapped sitting in a festering plane with overflowing toilets and grumbling or screaming humans.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Priviledged American demands convenience at all times...
Posted by: thoughtcriminal on Feb 24, 2007 9:29 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Get on the plane, fly here and there, and complain about the service. Where did all that jet fuel for Jet Blue come from... and where is all the burned jet fuel going? Into the atmosphere... global warming? It's a myth! They said so on FOX and in the Wall Street Journal, and they had a professor and everything to explain it. Cow farts or something. The world's oil reserves won't run out, either - they've been saying that for years now, haven't they?

We deserve all this - cheap energy, cheap airline tickets, gas guzzling cars - after all, it's your God-given right to consume, consume, consume - and it helps the economy too! I read about that, they say there's a need for consumer confidence. I'm confident, all right, but I expect prompt service, that's for sure. I paid for my flight, dammit!

Well... all the major US airlines agree that carbon emission caps to slow global warming are a bad idea. Airline ticket prices would go up and people would fly less. That would be bad for the corporate bottom line, but good for the rest of humanity.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

It IS a Hostage situation *paradigm shifts*
Posted by: maribelle on Feb 24, 2007 10:27 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If I get stuck on the tarmac for more than three hours, I plan to use my cell phone to call Homeland Security. Let’s face it, JetBlue and the rest of you: Anything more than three hours on the ground isn’t an airline delay, it’s a hostage situation.

Oh my god you are completely right. I never thought of it that way before. *paradigm shifts* Anyone who keeps me and my children for 10+ hours on end, in fetid conditions without food, and will not allow us to leave is NOT working in my interests (or of my fellow passengers) and should be reported to the authorities.

One can think "but they're just doing business". Yeah, so is Tony Soprano.

Thanks again, Barbara. (You had me at "Nickel and Dimed".)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Delays are GOOD, Air Travel BAD
Posted by: albrechtkrausse on Feb 24, 2007 11:03 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Once again 'progressives' don't get it. We should all be HAPPY that air travel is miserable. Just as we should ENJOY high energy prices. This is a way people will use LESS energy and LESS air travel which will help the environment. It will also help spur new technologies and businesses which will help the environment (work from home, shop locally, relax locally, smart growth, green energy, energy conservation, local crops/farming, etc.) You can't have your cake and eat it too! To save the environment means limited your lifestyle. Maybe put off that ski trip or trip to the Hamptons. Maybe turn down your thermostate for awhile. etc.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Oh PLEASE STFU. Posted by: Aimleft
The World Is Not Perfect
Posted by: anothername on Feb 24, 2007 1:42 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
10 hours on an airplane; 20 hours on an Interstate in Pennsylvania; 2 days in a bus terminal in Denver; or 30 minutes waiting for a local subway train ...

We build more airports; we build more roads; we reduce our other travel options; we need instant travel freedom ...

Dang air traffic controllers that can't put two objects in the same place at the same time safely; dang the holy being for putting a fog bank around an airport three hours after the plane was diverted there to get it out of the sky safely; make those attendants and pilots work 20 hours, we already force nurses to work double shifts. When they make a mistake because they are tired, we'll just sue them and their corporations.

I hear very similar complaints from Greyhound passengers as I do from Jet Blue passengers, which are not all that different from the person shopping at Wal-Mart before driving the car three miles to the multi-plex: We want action NOW! We also want someone else to pay for it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The airlines are just an epitome of the entire crumblingAmerican culture.
Posted by: ssegallmd on Feb 24, 2007 1:43 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The airlines are just another example of the failure of Reagan's insincere laissez-faire nonsense about privatization, free markets and deregulation being optimal in every situation. Throw in the absurd and meaningless security burdens imposed on passengers by the Bushian reaction to 911, and domestic air travel in the U.S. has become a progressively humiliating, embarrassing and dissatisfying experience ever since.

Imagine having a prepaid reserved seat on an airplane, arriving at the terminal in time to make the airplane, but not before an arbitrary earlier deadline that you missed and after which your seat was given away. That's assuming that your flight hasn't been changed to an earlier departure time and already departed, even though you were there when you were supposed to be.

Make sure to allow time to show your drivers licence or passport to every TSA employee you encounter, and to have to remove your shoes, throw out your liquids and corkscrews, briefly give up your wallet and laptop, and lately, be X-rayed and shown naked - assumiing that you are not on HSA's no fly list. This isn't the airlines fault, but it adds to the pleasure of the experience as Reagan envisioned it.

Oh, and then you get to fly to Chicago on your way from St. Louis to Dallas. And even though you are spending $600 for your ticket, you are served peanuts or pretzels instead of a meal and you can watch the movie if there is one, but you have to pay $5 to hear it. You are treated like trash from start to finish.

Why is it that virtually everything in America is failing? This is just the airline industry. Whatever we talk about succumbs to this type of analysis: schools, the military, FEMA, banking, accounting and investment services, the war on drugs, homeland security, health care, the auto industry in particular and manufacturing in general, yadda, yadda, yadda. The whole culture is rotting away like an old pumpkin a week after Halloween.

I've been a fan of democracy and capitalism all of my life, and I don't know of a better political or economic arrangement, but being an American has taught me that neither of those is so precious or praiseworthy that they are worth all of the hype that we give them or trust that we put in them. At best, they are the unstable and unreliable lessers of evils.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

what about the emergency exits?
Posted by: nor cal surfer on Feb 24, 2007 7:44 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
haven't heard a peep about them.

i flew cross country twice this past week, and thought about that option. i also recently flew cross country with my 2 kids (both under 3). man sakes alive, i would certainly not let them hold me hostage. it's impossible to say, and i would have had to have been there to sense the moment i would have taken action. perhaps the moment i smelled the overflowed toilets, or the moment i started to tear my t-shirt for a diaper.

"Can you assist us in an emergency?"

"Yes." good. "Everyone put on your jackets!" i would shout. "It's cold out, bundle up. We're gonna walk until they meet us, which will undoubtedly be pretty quickly."

People give the thumbs up, jackets on, poised and ready.

*kerrrr-snap*, pop the latch, swing the door, and slide. 90 seconds later a 4x4 w/flashing lights meets us walking across the closed runway, followed by a 3 trams w/snow tires.

where does it go from there? good question. if i got the cuffs for popping the door - hey, let a jury of my peers decide (who's in the wrong). a dad trying to get food and water for his kids, or a big business trying to keep the money grab going against the wishes of mother nature and all common sense.

seems like we'd know that outcome....

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» excellent feedback. thank you. Posted by: nor cal surfer
» true, sad but true Posted by: nor cal surfer
No lessons learned in 19 years by the FAA may have led to 9/11
Posted by: DougScott on Feb 25, 2007 2:35 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
In 1982, while a B727 captain for Continental Airlines, I landed in a snowstorm at Denver's old Stapleton airport and got stuck on the tarmac for two-plus hours waiting for a gate to open.

The delay didn't bother me personally because my paycheck increased $100/hour for the overage. But I was outraged by the inconvenience to my passengers. No matter how hard I begged on the radio, the airport refused to move an empty jetliner off its gate and let me taxi to the terminal.

Nineteen years later, in July 2001, the FAA showed its incompetence again by issuing safety bulletins about a possible hijacking threat to U.S. international airlines. but the Agency never alerted cockpit crewembers.

That sad fact was disclosed by the bipartisan 9/11 Commission in a preliminary report which stated: "Beginning on July 27, 2001, the FAA issued several security directives to U.S. air carriers prior to September 11. In addition, the FAA issued a number of general warnings about potential threats, primarily overseas, to civil aviation. None of these warnings required the implementation of additional aviation security measures."

In otherwords. the FAA exercised MINIMUM security measures, not the maximum, despite previous warnings by the Clinton administration about an Al Qaeda threat to strike America, including possible use of hijacked airplanes to carry out demands.

The same shameful reaction occured in 2002, this time by Homeland Security after it supposedly uncovered an Al Qaeda hijacking plot 9/11 style against the Tower Library building in Los Angeles, California. Once again, U.S. flight crews were NEVER warned.

To learn more about the so-called L.A. Tower "threat," visit my website -- www.King-George.biz -- the only one with hardcopy proof of White House corruption.

Hugh E. Scott, investigative journalist, Vietnam veteran, ex-USAF pilot and author of "George Dub-ya Bush, THE PHONY FIGHTER PILOT."

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Send love letters to Airline CEOs.
Posted by: DaBear on Feb 25, 2007 3:04 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The JetBlue thing is why I no longer travel via air unless there's physically no other way to do it. (That goes for long distance rail in the US, well, back when there was long distance rail to speak of. Amtrak makes JetBlue look like a clown car.) When we added offspring to our traveling needs, it only took a few trips on U.S. airlines to convince us, this is an utterly stoopid way to get from point A to point B. Besides that it just costs way too damned much, especially considering the migraines and psychological trauma involved.

All of this reinforces the observation that the corporation is a pretty piss-poor model for doing business, especially compared to the co-op. Parecon is the solution. But then, that would mean 'Mer'kuh would have to become america (with a little "a") and it seems foolish to hold one's breath for that.

I'm sure the fine young man with nine kids who runs JetBlue thinks he's doing a heckuva job and is worth his million dollar compensation package. Nine kids... jeesis, ever hear of birth control, buttmunch? Sounds like yet anouther rich asshat in need of a paycut.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Airlines are held to unrealistic standards
Posted by: bim on Feb 25, 2007 11:01 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The author is dead on about the skimping of the budget airlines, but fails to mention how the majors are forced to skimp as a result in order to have a competitive price. Unions have nothing to do with the situation,however, almost all the majors have unions despite their ineptitude and lack modern day relevancy. Airlines are a whipping boy from every angle and it is not justified. People complain about prices, food, small seats, cancellations, no back up planes and so on. Meanwhile, employees have not had raises in years and Airlines have Minuscule Profits despite scaling back to the max. If people received the service and perks they want prices would have to skyrocket. The airlines now spend more money on fuel than wages. Get educated about the industry before you speak armchair experts.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

xanax
Posted by: vados on Mar 17, 2007 6:06 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
xanax
Posted by: vados on Mar 17, 2007 6:09 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]