comments_image -

Science fights back

Prema Polit: Association fights willful ignorance of science; charts evolution of non-scientific thought.
February 20, 2007  |  
 
Advertisement
 

During this long weekend, the American Association for the Advancement of Science, the largest general science organization in the world, held their annual conference in San Francisco. Although the focus of this conference was on climate change, they couldn't ignore the unfortunate setback in a much more established arena of science: evolution.

In a presentation at the AAAS conference, Michigan State professor Jon Miller stated that only 40 percent of people in the United States believe in evolution. God save us. No, really. We could use some divine intervention in this one. The U.S. numbers contrast to the 80 percent of people in Denmark, Iceland, and Sweden who accept evolution.

Also featured in the conference was a workshop in how to run for school board, which seems a bit odd for a science gathering, but may be key to injecting some sense into the educational system. It's one of those times where facts do need to battle with blind faith.

Now, I'm all for debate and discussion in the classroom and life in general, for challenging norms and looking at things from a different perspective. But suffice to say, what belongs in a science classroom is debate based upon scientific evidence, not faith. Creationists and proponents of "intelligent design" try to fit evidence around a belief, rather than build a theory from evidence. And that's in their most scientific moments.

But somehow evolution, so widely accepted in the scientific realm, ends up battling with faith-based ideas for space in a science curriculum. This leaves the teachers on the front lines. Nine teachers and an activist were honored with the Scientific Freedom and Responsibility Award at the AAAS conference for their fight to keep the teaching of "intelligent design" out of the classroom.

I wish that so much political force was not necessary for science to hold its ground in the realm of education. Scientists should be free to pursue new frontiers in research rather than having to scramble through political muck. In the meanwhile, however, there can't be enough scientists on school boards around this nation, so take those papers out of the lab and onto the podium for a little while at least.

submit to reddit

-
Email
Print
Share
LIKED THIS ARTICLE? JOIN OUR EMAIL LIST
Stay up to date with the latest AlterNet headlines via email
Advertisement
Most Read
Most Emailed
Most Discussed
On REDDIT
On DIGG
 
loading most read content ..
Advertisement
Pro-Coal Group Pays People to Wear Its Shirts at EPA Hearing

By Heather Moyer | Sierra Club

 
 
Kids Inundate NY Governor With Concerns About Fracking

By Seth Gladstone | Food and Water Watch

 
 
Shareholders, Top Doctors Demand McDonald's Assess its Health Impacts

By Sara Deon | Civil Eats

 
 
Republicans Block NY Minimum Wage Increase That Would Give 880,000 Workers a Raise

By Laura Clawson | Daily Kos

 
 
Why Don't TV Meteorologists Believe in Climate Change?

By Katherine Bagley, | Inside Climate News

 
 
New Book Says Teenage Obama Was a Huge Pot Head -- So Why Won't He Legalize It for the Rest of Us?!

By Kristen Gwynne | AlterNet

 
 
Pew Poll Finds Clean Energy Is A Political Wedge Issue for Republicans

By Stephen Lacey | Climate Progress

 
 
Mitt 'Not Concerned with the Very Poor' Romney Visits West Philly, Gets Lesson in Keeping it Real

By Kristen Gwynne | AlterNet

 
 
Corporate Media Stokes Racial Angst in Election Coverage

By Adele M. Stan | AlterNet

 
 
5 Things to Know About the Paycheck Fairness Act (The Next Big Legislative Battle for Women)

By Annie-Rose Strasser | Think Progress

 
 
 
 
 
loading ...
POWERED BY DIGG'S USERS
 
[ page served from web 1 ]