Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Maybe We Deserve to Be Ripped Off By Bush's Billionaires

By Matt Taibbi, RollingStone.com. Posted February 20, 2007.


While America obsessed about Brittany's shaved head, Bush offered a budget that offers $32.7 billion in tax cuts to the Wal-Mart family alone, while cutting $28 billion from Medicaid.

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

Also in Top Stories

Sleeping Around Craigslist
Anna Reed, Lily Penza, East Bay Express

Bush's Secret Army of Snoops and Snitches
Matthew Rothschild, The Progressive

Michael Pollan on What's Wrong with Environmentalism
Kate Cheney Davidson, Yale Environment 360

A Peak Oil Prophet Imagines Life in America After Wal-Mart
Michelle Nijhuis, Grist.org

Sci-Fi Heroes Take on the System
Roya Rastegar, ColorLines

Billionaires Are Gouging Your Grandparents
Brave New Films, Brave New Films

Online Activists Keep the Pressure on Obama
Ari Melber, TheNation.com

More stories by Matt Taibbi

Get AlterNet in
your mailbox!

 
Advertisement

"Now, after she shaved her head in a bizarre episode that culminates a months-long saga of controversial behavior, it's the question being asked by her fans, her foes and the general public: What was she thinking?"-- Bald and Broken: Inside Britney's Shaved Head, Sheila Marikar, ABC.com, Feb. 19

What was she thinking? How about nothing? How about who gives a shit? How's that for an answer, Sheila Marikar of ABC news, you pinhead?

I'm not one of those curmudgeons who freaks out every time that Bradgelina moves the war off the front page of the Post, or Katie Couric decides to usher in a whole new era of network news with photos of the imbecile demon-spawn of Tom Cruise and Katie Holmes. I understand that we live in a demand-based economy and that there is far more demand for brainless celebrity bullshit than there is, say, for the fine print of the Health and Human Services budget.

But that was before this week. I awoke this morning in New York City to find Britney Spears plastered all over the cover of two gigantic daily newspapers, simply because she cut her hair off over the weekend. To me, this crosses a line. My definition of a news story involves something happening. If nothing happens, then you can't have "news," because nothing has changed since the day before. Britney Spears was an idiot last Thursday, an idiot on Friday, and an idiot on both Saturday and Sunday. She was, shockingly, also an idiot on Monday. It will be news when she stops being an idiot, and we'll know when that happens, because she'll have shot herself for the good of the planet. Britney Spears cutting her hair off is the least-worthy front page news story in the history of humanity.

Apparently, from now on, every time a jackass sticks a pencil in his own eye, we'll have to wait an extra ten minutes to hear what happened on the battlefield or in Congress or any other place that actually matters.

On the same day that Britney was shaving her head, a guy I know who works in the office of Senator Bernie Sanders sent me an email. He was trying very hard to get news organizations interested in some research his office had done about George Bush's proposed 2008 budget, which was unveiled two weeks ago and received relatively little press, mainly because of the controversy over the Iraq war resolution. All the same, the Bush budget is an amazing document. It would be hard to imagine a document that more clearly articulates the priorities of our current political elite.

Not only does it make many of Bush's tax cuts permanent, but it envisions a complete repeal of the Estate Tax, which mainly affects only those who are in the top two-tenths of the top one percent of the richest people in this country. The proposed savings from the cuts over the next decade are about $442 billion, or just slightly less than the amount of the annual defense budget (minus Iraq war expenses). But what's interesting about these cuts are how Bush plans to pay for them.

Sanders's office came up with some interesting numbers here. If the Estate Tax were to be repealed completely, the estimated savings to just one family -- the Walton family, the heirs to the Wal-Mart fortune -- would be about $32.7 billion dollars over the next ten years.

The proposed reductions to Medicaid over the same time frame? $28 billion.

Or how about this: if the Estate Tax goes, the heirs to the Mars candy corporation -- some of the world's evilest scumbags, incidentally, routinely ripped by human rights organizations for trafficking in child labor to work cocoa farms in places like Cote D'Ivoire -- if the estate tax goes, those assholes will receive about $11.7 billion in tax breaks. That's more than three times the amount Bush wants to cut from the VA budget ($3.4 billion) over the same time period.

Some other notable estimate estate tax breaks, versus corresponding cuts:

  • Cox family (Cox cable TV) receives $9.7 billion tax break while education would get $1.5 billion in cuts

  • Nordstrom family (Nordstrom dept. stores) receives $826.5 million tax break while Community Service Block Grants would be eliminated, a $630 million cut

  • Ernest Gallo family (shitty wines) receives a $468.4 million cut while LIHEAP (heating oil to poor) would get a $420 million cut

Digg!

See more stories tagged with: brittany spears, media, tax cuts, estate tax

Matt Taibbi is a writer for Rolling Stone.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
And don't forget...
Posted by: ahmlco on Feb 20, 2007 11:05 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
And don't forget Anna Nicole Smith. We obviously needed extended coverage of ex-Playboy bunny gold diggers.

Face it. The US media is only about two things: Distracting us from our real problems, and making us afraid of whatever it is we're supposed to be afraid of that particular week.

(Usually some country that Exxon-Mobil wants us to invade so they can grab it's oil.)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: And don't forget... Posted by: diamondvajra
» RE: And don't forget... Posted by: sasquuatch55
» RE: And don't forget... Posted by: jag585
Yes and no
Posted by: feduphoosier on Feb 20, 2007 11:18 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...and most of the rest of us, apparently, would rather sniff Anna Nicole Smith's corpse or watch Britney Spears hump a fire hydrant than find out what our tax dollars are actually paying for.

I disagree. Why do you think so many of us are out here on the Internet looking for real news, or out on the BBC website, or reading IPS or blogging? I believe most people do want to know the truth; they just don't know where to find it. If they didn't before Katrina... they do now. I believe Katrina was a major turning point. It was a massive demonstration of broken government and broken media. Actually, Anderson Cooper did a pretty decent job as a first responder. He just needed more water bottles.

I was trained as a journalist, and this whole corporate 'give the advertisers what they want' BS was already in full swing in the 80s -- which is why I never went into the business. I couldn't put aside my own ethics and drink the corporate Kool-aid, not where news reporting was concerned. But I do believe that people want and do deserve the truth.

Ours 'new' Congress was elected because somehow, some way, people found the truth - in spite of the corporate media. Most people probably had to really work to find it, as I do... they had to go out and search the Internet. Or enough people found the truth online and then went out and told their friends and family. Truth has a funny way of spreading.

Our corporate media has totally abandoned us. But what can you expect from a business now consolidated into the hands of only 6 owners? Fox is now the equivalent of the Pravda, and the rest aren't much better. The NYT shows flashes of rebellion. CNN, occasionally... but then immediately goes nuts over Anna Nicole Smith. I can't watch that garbage. Hardly anyone with an education can stomach it these days. But the truth will out, as demonstrated by the many alternative news sources available online. The truth is out here, and people are finding it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Demand vs. Capacity Posted by: kevred
» RE: Yes and no Posted by: CriminallySane
» RE: Well, so much for that argument... Posted by: sterlingdave54
» RE: Yes and no Posted by: feduphoosier
» RE: Yes and no Posted by: picket
» RE: Yes and no Posted by: steve.janv@hotmail.com
» RE: Yes and no Posted by: funnyfarm12
» Why so simple? Posted by: SteveB
» beg to differ Posted by: kathat
» RE: Yes and no Posted by: 7focus
All Waste Must Go
Posted by: edith on Feb 20, 2007 12:08 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Corporate Tax Subsidies should go as should excessive medicaid payments. Some lid has to be put on entilements and on defense spending and on corporate tax subsidies.

States have taxing power and should have the authority, without federal court interference to extend medicaid or other health benefits to poor and unemployed citizens of their states. That means having the power to establish residence requirements, a common sense incentive to helping one's true neighbors that the Burger and Rehnquist courts have cast aside as part of the judicial tyranny we endure in this decaying Republic.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: All Waste Must Go Posted by: BeeGee
» RE: All Waste Must Go Posted by: edith
Community Service Block Grants
Posted by: edith on Feb 20, 2007 12:11 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Just local money funneled through the federal bureaucracy which takes its cut and recycles it back to states that the Administration of the time favors. Why not keep the money in the communities to begin with.That "block" grant should be eliminated. Why should it stay? Because the word "community" is in it. Those block grants go to convention centers, Hyatt Hotels and other boondoggles designed to line the pockets and inflate the power of local politicians.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Wonderful article
Posted by: ElanaDMI on Feb 20, 2007 12:23 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I just wanted to say thank you for sharing this piece with us. Loved reading it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Embarrassing the Pols
Posted by: phantastikon on Feb 20, 2007 2:13 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Frighten a Politician

First, let me say welcome back to the actual Matt Taibbi, the one who's not afraid to call a shitweasel a dirty ole egg-suckin' dawg. Matt, we missed you and only hope you can come out of the closet and admit you're a socialist before your bio-pic is revised and the gray hair is revealed.

Anyway. Politicians of all parties (the two corporatist parties and the others) hate it when they (publicly) don't know the answers, especially when answers could only come from very low level staffers (there is a point coming, trust me).

Every time your elected official comes out of the bunker and confronts citizens, ask:

How much does a gallon of milk cost?

Should I go to the dentist, or pay my rent?

If the dollar is replaced with the Euro as the reserve currency, will my State's National Guard help me or herd me?

I know, I was writing about these embarrassing questions four years ago, but I think they were good questions then and, at least in my life, they're no less important now.

Since we can't recall federal officials and probably shouldn't shoot them; since they have more guns and money than we have, we need to turn them into the kind of media event that Matt, correctly, says Ms. Golddigger and Ms. Suddenly Bald Twatflash shouldn't be.

Even Fox would have to cover members of Congress flailing about for kitchen table data, hoping some poor-enough staffer might flip up a flashcard and save the day.

Our elected surrogates are rich or soon-to-be rich people. Their wardrobes and haircuts, their staff budgets, lunches, and perks are greater than millions of our household budgets. They (maybe) comprehend trillions, e.g., debts and deficits, billions, e.g., "earmarks," corporate entitlements, and tax revenue transfers, hundreds of millions, tens of millions, and (sigh) simple millions (their current and future earnings), but they DON'T comprehend thousands (the crumbs that can make, save, enrich the lives of actual citizens).

I dunno, but I think that, in order to get our lives on the evening news, "thousands" needs to become a sexy topic. Since, for tens of millions of us, $3000, as an example, is sexy.... how about a real REALITY show?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Welcome back Matt Posted by: eddie torres
» Trading Places Posted by: Jeanne
yes thank you
Posted by: ryazbeck on Feb 20, 2007 4:05 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Damn Matt you are an ass hole but you're so right and you say it so well. Thanks homie.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Who wants to think?
Posted by: meacoleman on Feb 20, 2007 4:18 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Matt, broadcasting the President's 2008 budget as news would force people to think and to get involved. Who wants to do that? Only a few of us actually enjoy using our brains to work through problems. The vast majority just want to gossip--it's easy and entertaining. Who could ask for anything more?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

bicyclebarron
Posted by: Bicyclebarron on Feb 20, 2007 5:18 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The choice be informed or entertained?

I don't think there needs to be any surveys or analysis to see what most Americans choose. If enough citizens in this country where informed the 2994 Presidential farce would have never happened.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: bicyclebarron Posted by: TheNamelessCity
» RE: bicyclebarron Posted by: TheNamelessCity
Capitalism vs. Socialism
Posted by: John Galt on Feb 20, 2007 6:32 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Sam Walton gave most of his Wal-Mart stock to his kids when Wal-Mart was tiny. He then successfully worked like hell for his family and made them rich. When he died no one paid death tax. You're just angy that no one did that for you.

By the way Bernie just wants what Marx wanted--the destruction of capitalism. You both scapegoat capitalists to gain converts. The trouble with capitalism is capitalists. The trouble with socialism is socialsim.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Sam Walton was a Theif Posted by: NoPCZone
» RE: Sam Walton was a Theif Posted by: John Galt
» RE: Selective Reasoning Posted by: NoPCZone
» RE: Selective Reasoning Posted by: longlivecheney
» to longlivecheney Posted by: Aufklaerung_Baboon
» RE: to longlivecheney Posted by: longlivecheney
» RE: Sam Walton was a Theif Posted by: blitzmesser
» RE: Sam Walton was a Theif Posted by: spanky
» RE: Capitalism vs. Socialism Posted by: jillbryant
» RE: Capitalism vs. Socialism Posted by: John Galt
» RE: Capitalism vs. Socialism Posted by: leafsong1
» RE: Capitalism vs. Socialism Posted by: hockey9966
» RE: Capitalism vs. Socialism Posted by: hockey9966
» RE: Capitalism vs. Socialism Posted by: jillbryant
» RE: Capitalism vs. Socialism Posted by: marxalot
» RE: Capitalism vs. Socialism Posted by: John Galt
» RE: Capitalism vs. Socialism Posted by: living-abomination
» RE: Capitalism vs. Socialism Posted by: longlivecheney
» RE: Capitalism soon to reach its limits Posted by: longlivecheney
» RE: Capitalism vs. Socialism Posted by: living-abomination
» RE: Capitalism vs. Socialism Posted by: longlivecheney
» RE: Capitalism vs. Socialism Posted by: Aufklaerung_Baboon
» RE: Capitalism vs. Socialism Posted by: hockey9966
» RE: Capitalism vs. Socialism Posted by: John Galt
» RE: Capitalism vs. Socialism Posted by: longlivecheney
» RE: Capitalism vs. Socialism Posted by: Suburban Dad
» RE: Capitalism vs. Socialism Posted by: John Galt
» RE: Capitalism vs. Socialism Posted by: hockey9966
» RE: Capitalism vs. Socialism Posted by: John Galt
» RE: Capitalism vs. Socialism Posted by: leafsong1
» RE: Capitalism vs. Socialism Posted by: BenjamminH
» RE: Capitalism vs. Socialism Posted by: John Galt
» RE: Capitalism vs. Socialism Posted by: joshuab
» RE: Capitalism vs. Socialism Posted by: Lincoln fan
» RE: Capitalism vs. Socialism Posted by: johnwcowan
» RE: Capitalism vs. Socialism Posted by: John Galt
» RE: Capitalism vs. Socialism Posted by: blitzmesser
» RE: Capitalism vs. Socialism Posted by: John Galt
» RE: Capitalism vs. Socialism Posted by: John Galt
Home Run, Matt
Posted by: NoPCZone on Feb 20, 2007 7:25 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If anyone had any remaining doubts or reservations about how evil and greedy this bunch is, there should no longer be any doubt. As to the newz media, anchors and publishers in the top bracket that wine and dine with the robber barons know where their money comes from. Reporting the truth might require a change in career, social standing and income bracket

I couldn't have said it better myself. Thanks.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Stop whining Matt
Posted by: nohope4change on Feb 20, 2007 7:47 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
You weren't born yesterday, you know the rules. You're most likely closer to the Mars family side of the scale financially then you'd like to say so stop whining! That goes for all you other whiners. If you don't like the financial situation your in don't blame anyone but your ancestors and/or yourselves. Like anything else you want to change, you have to change yourself first. Do something for yourself!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Clueless Dolt Posted by: marid
» Spot On, Marid Posted by: Suburban Dad
» Do something for yourself! Posted by: Lincoln fan
» RE: Stop whining Matt Posted by: Wacre
» RE: Stop whining Matt Posted by: living-abomination
trademan
Posted by: trademan on Feb 20, 2007 7:53 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
this is the soma that keeps the average amerikan wanting more. how can any of us be surprised how the media portrays what they consider news(worthy). they're all paid big bucks to keep amerikans DUMB and DUMBER!!!!!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» or DUMBERER Posted by: MartianBachelor
Shame on you Matt!
Posted by: WhatNow? on Feb 20, 2007 9:51 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I could have been blissfully ignorant of the latest spears bullshit. BUT NO! You had to make me aware. Damn! I learned another thing about her and j. simpleton recently. They were both mousekateers (sp?). I had never knew we had disney to thank for these annoying idiots but we do. Fuck disney!

Otherwise Matt an excellent article. You have reported on something that is very important and disturbing. You showed me once again why I should avoid the so called "news". I am still a little surprised how lousy our appointed leaders are. How can people be so callous and cruel. I guess the pen is still mightier than the sword. Who knows how many people the bush administration will maim, kill, torture, and destroy with the stroke of their budget pen. If this is amerika, AMERIKA SUCKS!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Oh yeah.
Posted by: WhatNow? on Feb 20, 2007 9:57 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I don't think I deserved to ripped off. But you have a point. The people who inebriate with this incessant bullshit possibly do deserve to be swindled but if they only knew even the simple stuff you mention, they might even wake from their stupor.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Mike Males
Posted by: mmales on Feb 21, 2007 1:05 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Fantastic article, Matt, as usual, but let's face it--no one, repeat NO ONE, in our culture deserves more blame than Rolling Stone for creating the despicable, escapist cult of celebrity crap--and Alternet and the left-wing "culture warriors" are hardly blameless. I write on youth issues, and Rolling Stone and Alternet have been relentlessly destructive on crucial issues such as ignoring teenage poverty and generational attrition while hyping sensational, idiotic demonizations of young people as supposed robots of pop culture corruption and excess. What are you doing to demand that your own magazine be more responsible?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Mike Males Posted by: djnoll
Maybe We Deserve Illegal Invasions, False Flags, and Black Ops
Posted by: weazl on Feb 21, 2007 3:13 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If you have the healthy degree of scepticism and critical thinking skills of Matt Taibbi. So should going a tad more in debt and helping out the Waltons be any different? Not if silly geese can even ask questions about big building falling in their faces in one of the world's most important cities.

By the way, I wonder if Matt asks what's in the dust?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Maybe We Deserve Illegal Invasions, False Flags, and Black Ops
Posted by: weazl on Feb 21, 2007 3:14 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If you have the healthy degree of scepticism and critical thinking skills of Matt Taibbi. So should going a tad more in debt and helping out the Waltons be any different? Not if silly geese can't even ask questions about big building falling in their faces in one of the world's most important cities.

By the way, I wonder if Matt asks what's in the dust?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

In
Posted by: Fat Man at the Buffet Line on Feb 21, 2007 4:02 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Principle I agree with the article, what bothers me about this article is that it is written like a shrill rant. I have nothing at all against a good quality high powered rant, but it really cheapens the whole article by using the word asshole and other choice words. If you want good news go loooking for it. Dont get your panties all in a bunch when the big media outlets start distributing the usual rubbish they distribute. I have read a few of Matts artciles here on this website and I find him to be infected with a good case of hyperbole. I am surprised that alternet even lets this kind of "journalism" on here. I am certainly no liberal, but I read alternet for the perspective and I am genuinely entertained by the hyperbole I read in the comments section. Thus what alternet is or has become is progressive pop media.... I will still continue to read alternet, butI would suggest that if you want to really have intelligent journalism at this website that you get rid of Matt....

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: In Posted by: cognitorex
» RE: In Posted by: Fat Man at the Buffet Line
» No thanks Posted by: henderson
» RE: In Posted by: PopRox80
» RE: In Posted by: Fat Man at the Buffet Line
» RE: In Posted by: mindcryme
» RE: In Posted by: Fat Man at the Buffet Line
» RE: In Posted by: Politicswho?
Good Anger!
Posted by: nickh on Feb 21, 2007 4:16 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Thanks for writing this article, and thanks for the well directed and articulated anger as expressed with your many four-letter expletives. these words serve an important communicative function. Keeping it "clearn" is just another softening of the American mentality. nick

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Good Anger! Posted by: Fat Man at the Buffet Line
re-post
Posted by: funnyfarm12 on Feb 21, 2007 5:04 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
From a semi-retired 'senior' in Missouri. I saw a lot of it coming too. IMO people in general are not so much distracted as they are numb. Take the battery out of the remote and watch what happens. I feel as if many are just afraid to face the fact that their elected officials are corrupt, reality is the world around them (not on TV), and shit doesn't just 'happen', it's made to happen.
The big challenge is how to wake them up. I think that when (not if) the time comes that they can't afford or find a loaf of bread, when the power goes out and doesn't come back on, when Dominos doesn't deliver anymore, at least a few of them will poke their heads out of their collective asses and ask what's going on.
In the words of Buffalo Springfield "There's something happenin' here, what it is ain't exactly clear..."

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» "There's something happenin' here..." Posted by: Aufklaerung_Baboon
From Dowd to Hannity
Posted by: cognitorex on Feb 21, 2007 5:07 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
FROM DOWD TO HANNITY

From the elite of the quill profession to the sometimes cartoonish talking heads of T.V., as in from Dowd to Hannity, the media of America do scant little to educate the public.

Collectively they behave as if they were youth taking alternating peeps through a hole in the wall of the boys and/or girls gym locker room. Espying a calf or a buttock they clamor and jostle to press their eye to the peephole and set off en masse to repeat gossipy chatter as news. This game, which is passed off as a profession, is today so ingrained that there is little reasoned analysis and the public neither wants nor expects any.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Bad Language
Posted by: UKMale on Feb 21, 2007 5:06 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Fat man makes a good point just above me. It is something I notice in almost all bloggs or Alternative News sites, or indeed most places in the Web; bad language makes me cringe when it is used in an article that actually wants to make a great point. How can I ask my 12 year old daughter to read these sites? I want her to learn that there is more to the world than she gets to see on the telly, but would I let her read an article with such language? No. As for her younger brother, where can he read what is really important. Sites like this, that really "appear" to want to make a difference, should ensure their site is suitable for all, and maybe even especially for the generation that is being failed so miserably in Education.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Bad Language Posted by: loril
» RE: Bad Language/vulgarities. Posted by: PopRox80
» RE: Bad Language Posted by: animalleaderisgreat
» RE: Bad Language Posted by: djnoll
For Lack of a Thesarus
Posted by: cognitorex on Feb 21, 2007 5:37 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The have's under Bush, Cheney, DeLay, etc have looted the treasury. Executives basically embezzle billions from "public" shareholders. Debt buildup of three trillion under these gangsters costs $150 billion a year in interest and the plan is to further cut US tax receipts by giving the Walton family $32 billion in tax relief.
As the haves stand with their boot on the throat of the average Joe, you quibble about the choice of language.
Cheny knows what the discourse entails. Says he, "Go F..k yourself" Mr. Patrick Leahy and all your high minded arguments for equal protection under the law.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I've Been Saying This For Years Now....
Posted by: Nez46 on Feb 21, 2007 5:56 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
a vast majority of my fellow citizens are dumber than a bag of rocks and deserve the shitty life they're going to end up with as a direct result of putting moronic, evil foxes in charge of the henhouse.
Many folks a lot smarter than I have argued that Democracies, by their very nature, are doomed to fail. After watching the political and social events of the last 40 years, I am beginning to agree. You cannot expect ignorant, easily manipulated dupes to make proper decisions about their lives, their country and their planet when they're not given the appropriate tools to do so. It is up to the democratic government to provide those tools and when it does not, it sounds the death knell for that democracy.
The clanging is now so loud it is deafening and yet, the majority of my fellow countrymen are so busy trying to figure out why some dumb drug addict shaved her head that they cannot hear the end of their own existence roaring towards them like a runaway freight train.
I would weep for them if I knew their stupidity hadn't also dragged me straight to hell with them.....

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: I've Been Saying This For Years Now.... Posted by: QuestionAuthority
Obfuscation
Posted by: outlander55 on Feb 21, 2007 6:16 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I have been harping on this for the last five years. America is more obsessed with NASCAR, American Idol, Paris Hilton and "BULLSHIT" than it is with what is really going on. And, it is the medias fault. The media's corporate cronies won't let the real news be reported. It is all a ploy to distract America from the dismantling of the American infrastructure and our way of life. If you want to know what is really happening, you have to research obscure sources and most Americans can not be bothered. I get more news from AlterNet and MediaMatters.com than from the Mainstream Media. But, that is because I choose to be informed rather than be a drone.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Good points, bad presentation
Posted by: Moonray on Feb 21, 2007 6:18 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
You are absolutely correct about the despicable budgetary priorities of the Bushies, but it wasn't necessary to fling spittle all over innocent bystanders as you bemoaned their iniquity.

So Tom and Katie's baby is an "imbecile demon-spawn"? How would you feel if someone described your child that way? How old are you -- twelve?

And Britney Spears is a troubled youg woman and a maybe a spoiled brat as well, but she's not an idiot. Your excessive rhetoric merely weakens your otherwise sound arguments.

Keep up the good work in exposing the Bushies, but try to avoid inflicting too much collateral damage.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Time to dismantle
Posted by: paschn on Feb 21, 2007 6:19 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Look closely at what your country has become. The Republicans and their neo-con splinter cell have finally brought it to a head, rather like a pus-filled boil. We aren't the "benevolent" human rights giant we've been gray-washed into thinking we are. Infact, this monstrous icon to corporate and individual rapaciousness is responsible for more deaths globally, ( either through duping the drones or covert operations by the corporate controlled government agencies) than ANY OF THE AXIS OF EVIL nations our latest ruling coward spouts off about. So, rather than hoping the latest batch of Republicrates are going to slap down Israel or the other powers that use our size and tax-payer dollars to fill their coffers to overflow with innocent blood, Tell your state officials to allow a vote to leave this evil union. Break it down,..dismantle it while you can.
Then war criminals like Kissinger, Bush et al will be alot closer to answering for their lies and crimes against humanity. Collectively, we're obviously too stupid to see the easy way out, ( nationalize communications and energy), so this is the last resort. Kill the beast that wanders about attacking and looking for more to devour.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Time to dismantle Posted by: Q-Shtik
This is what George Orwell didn't foresee.
Posted by: KeepsonTickn on Feb 21, 2007 6:20 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
People are more interested in Brittany's head or Anna Nicole's body because of the nonstop breathless coverage they get, not the other way around. The wholly owned news media are force feeding us this crap. Since it is the only thing people see, it becomes the topic of conversation.

I think the "news" conglomerates know that any bit of nonsense can be milked for about a week before the subject is saturated and people's eyes begin to roll back in their heads, so they move on to the next piece of made-up-crap-news.

Their goal is to keep legitimate news off the airwaves. The solution is to break up the news conglomerates, who use their monopoly to obscure the real truth from the public in the interest of their corporate owners.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I've always found the notion that frames are important to be rather silly, but...
Posted by: ABetterFuture on Feb 21, 2007 6:24 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...your first step should be to stop calling it a tax cut, because almost everyone who pays taxes likes their taxes being reduced.

Even if you're a traditional, Barry Goldwater conservative, the kinds of budgets that Bush has sent to the hill not only this year but this whole century are the worst-case scenario; they increase spending generally while cutting