Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

In Defense of Mercenaries

By Lorelei Kelly, AlterNet. Posted February 20, 2007.


The bottom line is that the privatization of U.S. National Security is a trend that has been ongoing for years. And the billions of dollars disappeared by contractors in Iraq make disgraced lobbyist Jack Abramoff look like Little Bo Peep.
Advertisement

This article has previously appeared on democracyarsenal.org and the Huffington Post.

Remember that old movie "Escape from New York," the one where the city has become a large prison populated by violent and depraved criminals? A story that fell between the cracks of the State of the Union last month -- two downed Blackwater helicopters, five Americans dead -- made me remember the images from that film. No escape, not by land, not by air, not by sea.

Some news reports speculate that four of the five were shot on the ground. Ugh and sigh. I know it is hard for some people to feel outrage or grief over the death of private military contractors -- an attitude that I often find is supported by perverse logic and misplaced anger about our own government's dysfunction. The bottom line is that the privatization of U.S. national security is a trend that has been ongoing for years. It was a conversation that Congress forgot to have during the heady government-hatin' rally that passed for a legislature for the past decade. So here we are. The Washington Post recently reported that there are some 100,000 contractors in Iraq alone, including 25,000 private security contractors.

This exceeds the number of all coalition forces combined, and is only 40,000 less than the number of U.S. troops in Iraq. It is a virtual army of largely unregulated individuals working on behalf of U.S. national interests. From strategic weapons systems as the B-2 stealth bomber and Global Hawk to running ROTC programs, the military has been colonized by corporations. This is all legitimate business created by our own government -- though the billions of dollars disappeared by contractors in Iraq make Abramoff look like Little Bo Peep.

When I was a Hill staffer some years ago, I remember going on a site visit to one of our national labs. Our tour guide and host gave me a card with both the U.S. government and Lockheed Martin logos on it. I was puzzled, but it didn't strike me until later just how pervasive this sort of privatization is. Later, after a missile defense trip larded with industry dollars, I became a purist. I don't want profit-making entities to have a large decision-making influence on any part of our government.

Handing over public tasks to the free market without a thorough discussion about what are essential government responsibilities is the hallmark of the era that just ended. The new Congress has set out an ambitious agenda of contract oversight. But a much larger conversation needs to happen at the same time. Now is the chance for Democrats and rebellious Republicans to put forward a governing philosophy that will provide a backdrop for all policy decision making, one that values a public sector that is the keeper of our collective memory. Values measured by the common good, not by NASDAQ.


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: military contractors, mercenaries

Lorelei Kelly is the director of the Real Security Initiative at the White House Project. She also blogs at TheHuffingtonPost.com.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Sounds like trouble...
Posted by: Colin on Feb 20, 2007 2:38 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The secret, as they say, to good business is being a good middleman.

It strikes me that these mercs provide the perfect middleman between the state and the violence required to support that state. It’s a good relationship for the state as what needs to be done is so, but without the worry of blood on your own hands. It’s a good relationship for the mercs as they are the middlemen we mentioned earlier. And it doesn’t matter about those who get caught up in the violence as they are generally foreign (or from New Orleans).

Personally, I’m of the opinion that this lot should come under the jurisdiction of an international law that supersedes the laws of the individual countries that pay for them. Having soldiers who are regulated by the laws of the land they come from is one thing (albeit, generally, it is not enough – Abu Ghriab anyone?), mercs clearly fall in between the lines. And, I couldn’t give a monkey’s uncle if people turn around and suggest there is a paper thin series of rules and regulations that they are meant to adhere to. History, day in day out, proves these to be worthless.

You never know – a strong stance on an issue like this might even be a way to start giving the UN back its teeth.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Not Only
Posted by: Dboy on Feb 20, 2007 3:26 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Not only are mercenaries in the military to stay...so are WE (US citizens). If you pay taxes, you're part of the war machine just as much as a mercenary. And that's a problem, for me anyway. It's like trying to be a pure vegan and then finding out that Thai Tofu with Basil that tastes so good has fish sauce in it..oops.

Our culture has been militarized. I suppose you could say it started with the "duck and cover" propaganda films. And this relates to 9/11. If General Dynamics, Boeing, etc. are funded by Wall St., then was 9/11 really a "terrorist" act or was it just your average normal everyday military strike? Who are civilians anymore?

Frankly, we're all killers, and we're all war profiteers. Not so good for the karma me thinks.

Dboy

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Not by choice. Posted by: OpinionsGetOld
» RE: Not by choice. Posted by: Lauren
» Ah, but we don't HAVE to pay Posted by: grim ripper
Mercs.
Posted by: itchyvet on Feb 20, 2007 3:35 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
My My, how the wheel turns, I remember the days when anyone volunteering their services to fight someone else's war were vilified and even jailed.
Now, it appears it's perfectly acceptable, PROVIDED you volunteer for the U.S./Brit/Australian co-alition of the willing.
Volunteer for anyone else and you automatically become an enemy combatant for whom the "quaint Geneva Convention" doesn't apply.
Apparently very few people recoginise the contradiction in this, or worse still, couldn't give a rats arse, until they come face to face with them as in New Orleans, all of a sudden the penny drops, just a tad too late.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Expand Horizons Even Further
Posted by: diof09 on Feb 20, 2007 4:33 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I would be happy for an overall discussion on the roles of the public sector versus the private sector as well as the shadowy not-for-profit sector and why checks and balance is key. Heck, I'd be happy if we'd agree just to categorize our discussions with these broad terms instead of mercs, bureaucrats, big government, corporatists, etc. and all the other obfuscating terms that do not move the discussion further. I want to know once and for all why "we the people" have let the private sector so hostilely take over our public sector!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Our Own Praetorian Guard!
Posted by: horsecanyon on Feb 20, 2007 4:50 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Two thousand years ago the Roman emperor Augustus formed the Praetorian Guard so that he would have a private military force independent of the Roman army. Not long after his death, the Praetorian Guard had become notorious for its role in assassinating emperors, meddling in politics and preying on the people of Rome.

Hitler formed the Schutzstaffel (the SS) in the 1920’s as a private military arm that would be under his direct control and independent of the regular army and police. In the beginning, the SS numbered only a few hundred men, but by the end of the war had enrolled hundreds of thousands, had completely absorbed all police functions in the Reich and was acting beyond regular military control. And it was the SS of course that organized and staffed the concentration camps and death camps.

Private militaries ALWAYS become instruments of oppression and the tools of despots. This outsourced military now being born in the U.S. is a tyrant's dream.

And there are already more than one hundred thousand of these mercenaries???

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Wall Street Twist Posted by: eddie torres
Hi Drones
Posted by: paschn on Feb 20, 2007 6:33 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Again, the huge footprint of Republicans and their core can be seen here. By privatizing, billions of taxpayer dollars can legally be diverted into corporate, ( Republican) coffers. Which will mean lower wages and bare bones execution of charters and statutes.
And all the while, the worker drones affected the most by this crap are actually supporting them.
Republicans, if you look CLOSELY at their CORE have been the "whip wielders" lashing out at the common man for over 100 years. Since their vengeful legislation passed to bring the south back into the union to their working fellow citizens literally to death by using their "lackeys" in our, ( insert their), government to sic "our boys" on us, (Ludlow massacre).
A nation of sheep,led by a cartel of whores, controlled by big business. Welcome, to the REAL Evil Empire.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Bigger than billions Posted by: eddie torres
» RE: Hi Drones Posted by: Dboy
The Only Job In Town
Posted by: VannaLaRoche on Feb 20, 2007 6:38 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Come back from the military, are you going to flip burgers or pull triggers? You create killers and expect them to work service-industry jobs, or become CNAs or CAD designers if they get that government money they won't get for an education?

Nope: the only job for a returned soldier is merc. Katrina was (and is) no more than a field of operations. New York, San Francisco, same thing. Waste 'em in Baghdad or waste 'em in San Diego, no difference.

Pretty soon the only jobs in CheneyCo will be hump person, dirt person, or death person. Take your pick. That's it. You don't need an education.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Wild Cards Posted by: eddie torres
No Hope? Hope!
Posted by: bjerko on Feb 20, 2007 6:54 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I don't like the title (nothing is impossible to change unless you refuse to change your mind). That said, GOOD ARTICLE! Citizens of the United States (couch potatoes too!) need to take action on all issues that are of public interest and force our government to take appropriate action. Why can't we do like Gandhi did? We need peace and justice and freedom. Enough is enough!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: No Hope? Hope! Posted by: VannaLaRoche
Please use the G.I. Bill
Posted by: bjerko on Feb 20, 2007 6:55 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It's the one redeeming feature of being a veteran. (Yes, I know it's not enough, but it helps.)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Get Used to It? WHY?
Posted by: jhbeck23 on Feb 20, 2007 7:16 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It sounds punchy and aggressive and very loud-restaurant-in-Manhattan-ish, but the message of "get used to it" is complete horse-puckey. "Cyber-journalists deride the world in many ways, but the problem is to change it."

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Get Used to It? WHY? Posted by: VZEQICVA
» RE: Get Used to It? WHY? Posted by: VZEQICVA
GET USED TO IT ?
Posted by: VZEQICVA on Feb 20, 2007 7:25 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
NO! I'm tired of 'getting used to it'. That's all we've been asked to do for six years. Look where it's gotten us. People have a right to earn a living. That not the same as robbing the tax payers blind. Billions and billions of $$ missing and you want me to get used to it. The purpose of the war in Iraq is to make some people rich. It's working. But the people at the other end get poor. Surely the author is smart enough to know it can't happen any other way. Thanks, ANNA

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

America does not want a draft
Posted by: Ellie1 on Feb 20, 2007 7:30 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
and this is the price we pay for an administration who wants military occupation of other countries. Until Bush and his ilk are history, and the U.S. stops being the aggressor instead of the negotiator, we will need a paid military. Since I came of age during Vietnam, I remember the fear and death it imposed on my generation. Too bad GWB didn't go (and get killed there, the chicken hawk), maybe he would realize what he has started. But then I don't think he is smart or empathetic enough to realize anything but profit. Damn I hate that man.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: America needs a draft Posted by: Ripcord
Mercenaries are illegal
Posted by: Doubtom on Feb 20, 2007 7:36 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What precisely is it that makes the utilization of "civilians under arms" in a foreign nation legal? What law was passed, when and by whom? These mercenaries do what they do in our name, regardless of whether we like it or not. To whom do the mercenaries answer in the event they kill someone? Our own soldiers answer up to the "chain of command". Our soldiers perform their duties under the control of our officers who respond to our government officials; what or who decides the activity of these civilians? These are serious questions we should all be asking.

Are these mercenaries autonomous or subordinate to the military command in the area? Who decided the salary ranges? What Department lets these contracts? Under what rules of engagement do they perform? Who supplies their arms and ammunition?What do these mercenaries cost the taxpayers?
Does anyone remember mercenaries being discussed by either House of Congress?

That they were finally brought under the Military Code of Conduct just this last October, looks like someone FINALLY figured out that these guys are armed without control and they represent US! Gee, what bright bulb finally figured that out? I'm serious with that question, who decided to finally put some control on these paid killers? I'd like a name if anyone has it.

I have addressed all these questions and more, to my Representative, Susan Davis of California and to Senator Boxer of California and have received no answer. Senator Boxer did respond but didn't address any of my questions, revealing that she had not read the letter at all.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Mercenaries are illegal Posted by: Doubtom
Military Contractors Policing US Citizens
Posted by: Naomi on Feb 20, 2007 7:44 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
THE NEW SECRET POLICE

It's not just on foreign soil where military contractors are operating, but here in the US as well. Everyone has heard about Blackwater and other mercenaries in New Orleans following Katrina, but few people have even heard the extent by which private contractors are providing surveillance, weaponry, and even "undercover snatch squads" during large protest mobilizations. 2003 FTAA in Miami, and the 2004 G8 in Georgia are two documented examples.

Pay attention: www.saveourcivilliberties.org

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Wasn't that one of the factors in the fall of Rome???
Posted by: Prophit on Feb 20, 2007 7:46 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Didn't they, in the end, begin using mercenaries for their ventures? It seems to me I read that somewhere, I could be wrong, but the point that was made is once you begin military conquests for profit you lose the idealism that military service was for the nations welfare, not for profit.

If the private companies want to use military mercenaries, thats fine, but we should set the rules they must operate by if they are being paid with our tax dollars and they are. That means they have to abide by the same rules of engagement, take an oath to defend and protect, and not to follow illegal orders, be under the command of the military structure and not the corporations etc. If not, then they do not represent the pesence we are exhibiting which is America.

If the companies do not have a military or reconstruction contract with the US, then fine, they are on their own and should never mention the name of our country from their lips. They then represent the company they work for.

I frankly don't think we should be allowing this at all. At the very least there should be hearings on it and we as a nation should decide. The army etc had military men who performed those servcies including civil engineering, bridge building, roads etc We should go back to that again, it worked better.

If a contractor comes and tries to take my guns like they did in New Orleans, he is in for a rude awakening since he holds no authority as far as I am concerned.

CORPORATE AMERICA DOES NOT OWN THIS COUNTRY NOR DO I HAVE TO REPOND TO THEM WHAT SO EVER. THE GOV WORKS FOR ME AND THEREFORE BY DEFAULT SO SHOULD THOSE CONTRACTORS.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

"Even now, when all the commies are watching American Idol."
Posted by: WhatNow? on Feb 20, 2007 8:08 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I always wondered what was wrong with these people. So they're the commie pinko fags? I had always thought I was because I'm no fan of big business. I guess I must be a terrorist now since the idol watchers have become the new commies. Oh well, at least I'm not a capitalist pig!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

History
Posted by: parkslopper50 on Feb 20, 2007 8:08 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Isn't this part of why Rome fell?
How about the British in the 'New World'?
Why are we doing it now? Was this war started for money or oil ?(LOL) Or, was this in our national interests?(LOL)
If I answer this and history answers this we are in deep do-do!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: History Posted by: Lauren
Free Marketeers
Posted by: eddie torres on Feb 20, 2007 8:45 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Kelly: "Handing over public tasks to the free market without a thorough discussion about what are essential government responsibilities..."

Unfortunately, the "free market" is a corporate myth perpetrated by ideologically motivated gravy-train cheerleaders. Simply put: when it comes to military contracting, there ain't no competition.

Who dreamed up ideas like "cost-plus" and "no-bid"?

Revolving-door government officials who knew their hopes of a comfortable retirement rested on their contractor-friendly public service records, which would grant them access to senior private management positions with corporate benefit and perk plans - usually a home in a gated golf community in Florida or Arizona, within 10 miles of a private cancer-treatment ward.

And they'll know exactly where to look to hire mercs to guard those gated communitites against the "skinnies" (Americans who've lost everything).

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Free Marketeers Posted by: Lauren
» RE: Free Marketeers Posted by: Doubtom
Did ANYONE Really Listen to the SOTU?
Posted by: djnoll on Feb 20, 2007 10:57 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"A second task we can take on together is to design and establish a volunteer Civilian Reserve Corps. Such a corps would function much like our military reserve. It would ease the burden on the Armed Forces by allowing us to hire civilians with critical skills to serve on missions abroad when America needs them. It would give people across America who do not wear the uniform a chance to serve in the defining struggle of our time." George E. Bush, January 2007

While he calls this a volunteer corps of civilians, it is just a government funded mercenary group - and what makes anyone think that he intends to have them serve abroad? Make no mistake, he has put the nation and Congress on notice that he intends to build a private Army to do whatever is necessary as he sees it! And, he knew that no one would listen or understand, so he brazenly included it in this speech. He will always be able to point to it and say I told you this is what we were doing, you just weren't listening! These few lines fell through the cracks right along with the helicopter story the writier referred to in her article.

WHY IS NO ONE LISTENING TO THIS MAN?

He intends to use the services of groups like Blackwater, and trust me, they will be more than happy to protect him and his for a price when the American people stand up and fight back. They will be his Black Shirts, and they will be just as ruthless.

PAY ATTENTION AMERICA - SPEAK UP AND LOUDLY - AND PREPARE TO ACT! Peaceful marches and demonstrations will not change this madman's course. He wants war and he wants dictatorship. These private armies at his beck and call are what he will use when the military no longer will follow his orders - he just wants us to pay for them until then.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Leave us not forget Iraq Posted by: brotherjonah
Don't worry
Posted by: chaoslegs on Feb 20, 2007 12:38 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The next folks to hire these Mercs will be the wealthy to protect them against the disgruntled and exploited domestic workers.

Yeah, I read too much sci-fi, but how is the collision course our society is headed for any different from what the strike busters during the Gilded Age, except this time everyone is going to be pissed off. Remember Blackwater was operating in New Orleans post Katrina.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Sci-Fi Posted by: Dboy
» RE: Sci-Fi Posted by: eddie torres
» RE: Sci-Fi Posted by: Lauren
This (Mercenary's) Gun For Hire
Posted by: hotlipsin61 on Feb 20, 2007 12:55 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Those who seek this type of dangerous adventure will get what they deserve-sooner or later. I guess it's human nature-to travel around the planet and kill people for the sake of profit, plunder, or to get rich.
Mercenaries are experts at this cruel game. Hired guns like Blackwater and their ilk make me puke. It's a shame our fascist government has allowed this corrupt culture into the military.
Look at what transpired in Sierra Leone last decade: That sweaty, violent country was crawling with foreign mercenaries armed to the teeth participating in the diamond trade, killing anyone who interfered with a company's profits. It's not a new tactic. Hired soldiers were used by the Confederates in the Civil War, so we're doing the same in Iraq.
I have no sympathy with mercenaries. They're not overseas in the name of patriotism or to defend the country. They're out to make a buck.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

So...
Posted by: JoshuaLudd on Feb 20, 2007 1:29 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Does that mean that these mercs can get around Posse Comitatis (which has already been repealed)? Are we going to see them opperating on OUR streets at some point?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» What about mercenaries????? Posted by: Doubtom
» RE: So... Posted by: Dboy
» RE: So... Posted by: Lauren
ONLY DEATH IS INEVITIBLE
Posted by: chanceny on Feb 20, 2007 2:41 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
And, when these mercs come back home, they won't have to rely on starved and neglected veteran's organizations for their healthcare. Those elite bastards that sanctioned them to fight their obscene battles for self-enrichment, regardless of the treason they cravenly commit as they plunder and loot in compulsive search to attain their unlimited black- hearted desires, will surely pick up the tabs for their private warriors. Well, perhaps, unless their financial advisors point out the enormity of such a compassionate commitment could severely limit the purchase of yet another private, gated mansion destined to provide them the insulation from the unfortunate reality of the human condition they caused by their sanctimonious indifference and outright greed. We must present these mercenary recruits to the American public surrounded by pictures of their historical brethren, the brownshirted Nazi enablers, and, yes, their Roman counterparts who ruthlessly and ignorantly fought only to satiate the insane visions of delusinal self-proclaimed kings. America will never survive once we accept the inevitibility of a shadow army whose raison d'etre is to protect and defend the legitimacy of the enemies within - the bush/cheney/rice treasonously repulsive 'vision' of what it means to be American.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Amen. Posted by: brotherjonah
A Load of Feminist Crap is at the Bottom of this Pork Barrel..
Posted by: ekipnrut on Feb 20, 2007 2:53 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Here I offer without comment the author's bio:
Lorelei is a national security specialist focused on helping elected leaders "reframe" security for the challenges revealed by 9/11. She is the Director of the Real Security Initiative at the White House Project, an organization whose mission is to elevate women's voices in culture, media and politics -- specifically to bring more women into national security decision making. In addition to working with the underground democracy movements of eastern Europe throughout 1989, Lorelei's professional background includes teaching at Stanford University's Center on Conflict and Negotiation, Senior Associate at the Henry L. Stimson Center, a DC think tank, and more than 8 years working on bipartisan national security education in Congress, where she continues to advise the Progressive Caucus. She has a Grinnell College BA and a Stanford MA. Lorelei has been trained as a professional mediator in both domestic and international conflict resolution settings. She also attended the Air Command and Staff College program of the US Air Force as well and continuing education programs at National Defense University and Army War College. Her latest publication is a guidebook for citizens entitled "Policy Matters Educating Congress on Peace and Security" which is available online. She also blogs regularly
at
DA
The bios she refers to in the article are, for the most part, of GenX EuroAmericans with credentials from places like Stanford and Harvard etc,.etc.
The basic premise articulated in some of these bios is the
assumption that Africa ,for example, needs, warrants the 'guiding hand' of competent wise white folks to make the subSaharan safe for international investment and 21st century globalization as deemed appropriate by other wise and noble EuroAmerica whites. But of course.. The checkbook/cruise missile LITE..
with special guest appearances by our favorite rave, hip hop and new age artists. :O)
Hmmmm..Double Double...Toil and Trouble....Charming or
is it Charmed? :O)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Shoot the messenger? Posted by: lessbread
Not merenaries, but they kill people for money.
Posted by: brotherjonah on Feb 20, 2007 4:00 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Kind of like "not prostitutes, but they get paid to have sex"

Not armed robbers, just because they withdraw funds at gunpoint.

in the case of these Private Military Contractors, that last is as literal as the title of this comment.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The "Advantages" of Using Contractors
Posted by: sofla100 on Feb 20, 2007 7:03 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The biggest reason for contracting in war zones is to lesson government accountability. Bottom line, even with the Uniform Code of Military Justice applying to some contractors (which even for the active force the code is not always enforced), the contractors are going to be able to carry out tasks and operations without the heavy burden of being "direct representatives of the USA" (as soldiers so obviously are). This is a real plus to an administration obsessed with terrorism and trying to win a war (in Iraq) it is now failing. Bush has been perfectly clear on many ocassions that he favors an aggressive, pre-emptive strike against "possible" current or to be "terrorists" and "terrorist nations." To accomplish this, Guantanamo was created, secret prisons were created, extraordinary rendition put in place, NSA spying commenced even on Americans at home, and Bush fought against any attempt to limit the Presidents ability to authorize torture and clandestine acitivities. Now, a perfect solution for Bush is simply to look at just "farming the nasty business out." Hence in Iraq, many thousands of American private contractors "train" Iraqi soldiers, teach them "interrogation techniques" and the like. But, if a contractor gets in trouble for using torture or illegally killing civilians, the USA can easily distance itself from the contractor. And, contractor deaths, not even acknowledged fully now by the Pentagon, are not flashed across American television or news shows. On top of that, contractor numbers do not have to be part of the "troop total" numbers in the country nor is there nearly as much worry about Congressional oversight of them. So, this is "win-win" in Bushes eyes and for the Pentagon. Of course, these contractors do not come cheap, and we can see good evidence of this just looking at the current Defense budget. In fact, it is far more expensive then if the work were done by the military or directly employed US civilians. But, for Bush and the Pentagon, the ability to jettison government accounability, to keep down the number of soldier deaths reported to the public (as they are simply replaced with undisclosed contractor deaths) and especially to "take the gloves off" with "Americas enemies" is something that is truly priceless.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Helps explain organizational problems.
Posted by: youngdem on Feb 21, 2007 5:05 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
One solution to avoid mercenaries might be to stop getting into wildly unpopular wars so more young people might actually be willing to join the military. But that's another discussion altogether.

It also, in my mind, helps explain some of the organizational and budget issues the government has been having in Iraq. It's hard enough to keep track of the budget within one organization, it's much harder to coordinate several. It's sometimes hard for me to believe that is the same government, the one that's not getting enough body armor, the one that's losing money unaccountably right and left, that organized the V-day invasion of Europe. And apparently part of the answer is that it's not the government doing these things at all. It's subcontractors who I didn't vote and didn't gain their rank through the military. In the short term, military contractors are cheaper, because the government doesn't take on the task of training them, but in the long term, the organizational nightmare and different financial accountability may end up costing more.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]