Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
100 words for 100 days: submit your 100 word essay and get published on AlterNet
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Bush's Brinkmanship Emboldens Hardliners in Iran

By Kimia Sanati, IPS News. Posted February 17, 2007.


Whether or not the military posturing by the United States toward Iran actually results in conflict, militarist hardliners in Iran are using Bush's threats to strengthen their political status.

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

More stories by Kimia Sanati

Get AlterNet in
your mailbox!

 
Advertisement

Whether or not the military posturing by the United States and Iran in the Persian Gulf and the Sea of Oman actually results in armed hostilities, militarists in this country are having a field day.

While politicians such as Hashemi Rafsanjani, Khatami and Mehdi Karrubi (reformist former parliament speaker) are seeking to lower tensions, the militarists see an opportunity in the confrontation.

"Militarists are still craving for a confrontation with the U.S. because this can strengthen their status," said an observer, who requested anonymity. "Their future will depend on the outcome of the standoff."

Last week, Iran's elite Revolutionary Guards Corps' (IRGC) naval and air forces staged a military manoeuvre in the Persian Gulf and the Sea of Oman near the Hormuz Strait to test-fire the newly acquired, Russian-made TOR M-1 surface-to-air defence shield, claimed to be short-range by the manufacturer.

The war games were the country's second since a Dec. 23 United Nations resolution banned sale to Iran technology or material that could be used in its nuclear or missile programmes. But Iran test-fired its short-range missiles in January.

The military exercise held by IRGC's air wing and code-named 'Saeqeh' (Thunderbolt) was designed to boost air defence and counter-attack "any possible" offensive against the Iranian airspace, Brig. Gen. Hossein Salami, the commander, was quoted as saying by the official IRNA news agency.

The TOR M-1 air defence shield has a 12 km range which could be increased to 20 km, Salami said and added that it is capable of rapidly tracing down 48 targets and engaging with eight, including cruise missiles simultaneously. The system, capable of tracing modern Cruise missiles, was successfully test-fired on the first of the two-day manoeuvres, Salami said.

In addition to a number of other short- and medium-range missiles, IRGC deployed the SSN4 land-to-sea strategic missile in operations dubbed Ra'd (Thunder) on the second day of the exercise, Rear Admiral Fadavi of IRGC naval force was quoted saying. The missile can carry a 500-kg warhead and is capable of targeting and destroying big warships, he said.

The military exercises were being carried out at a time the United States is increasing its military presence in the Persian Gulf and the Sea of Oman, and concerns are escalating about a possible U.S. military action against Iran. The manoeuvres can be considered a response by the IRGC as a military-political force.

The IRGC, the regular army and the law enforcement forces act under the command of the Joint Staff of the armed forces. All chief commanders are appointed by Ayatollah Ali Khamenei who as Supreme Leader is commander-in-chief of the armed forces.

IRGC is an over 200,000-strong force. Established immediately after the Islamic Revolution, it has continued to serve alongside the regular army. Growing fast and trusted much more than the regular armed forces of the time that still had many members from the royal army, it was invested by the Iranian Constitution with responsibility to "safeguard the Revolution and its achievements."

"Being made responsible to safeguard the achievements of the Revolution meant a dual role for IRGC, unlike the regular army that has always served as an exclusively military body and has never got involved in political disputes or factionalism, a role it still continues to play," an analyst in Tehran told IPS.

Having air, naval and ground forces of its own, very much parallel to the regular army, the IRGC has two additional divisions, namely, the Basij militia and the vaguely defined Qods Force, a body said to have been established originally to export the Islamic revolution to other countries.

The Qods Force and its activities are kept pretty much in the shadows. The five diplomats the U.S. army arrested in Irbil, northern Iraq, in January allegedly belong to the Qods Force.


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: iran, military, hardliners

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
I do not know any soldier that wants to go into Iran,
Posted by: White middleclass male on Feb 17, 2007 3:12 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
but I would like to see some of those bastards dead for every EFP (Explosively formed projectile; advanced Road side bombs) that goes through HMMWV armor, and every armor penatrating round that has killed one of my brothers in arms.

militarist hardliners in Iran are using Bush's threats to strengthen their political status.

You do not need to strengthen your polital status in a country were people are affraid to dissent.

Do you believe:
in the right to worship how you choose?
Women are equal to men?
Gays should have any rights?
Gays should be allowed to live?
Free speach?
If you said yes to anything in that short list, Islam is your enemy.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Brainwashed? It must be the jewish media Posted by: White middleclass male
» You've been duped Posted by: lessbread
Why Bush creates conflict
Posted by: DougScott on Feb 17, 2007 5:36 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Virtually everything George W. says or does creates conflict and unintended consequences. But then, what should we expect from the only National Guard pilot during the Vietnam War who received second lieutenant bars WITHOUT any officer training whatsoever.

He never attended a service academy like West Point, never took college ROTC, never went to Officers Candidate School and never served on active duty as an enlisted man. So how did Dub-ya learn to be an officer?

He didn’t. The only military training George W. received prior to being commissioned happened during a six-week basic airman course, the equivalent of Army boot camp for privates. Even more absurd, while his fellow recruits marched, pulled KP and cleaned toilets, Airman Bush was given a week off to work for the GOP in Florida.

Later that year, 1968, following basic training in Texas, when Lt. Bush headed off to fly USAF trainers at Moody AFB. GA, he barely knew how to salute, much less lead men. And he didn’t learn the art in flight school, either. His time at Moody was devoted to airmanship, not leadership.

Had George W. earned his officer rank the old-fashioned way -- by WORKING for it -- he might've finished his six-year Guard commitment honorably. Most importantly, more U.S. troops wouldn't be going to Iraq, to be needlessly killed and wounded in Baghdad streets. Nor would Bush be trying to provoke an insane, self-serving war with Iran.

Hugh E. Scott, Texas Aggie (Class of 1956), Vietnam veteran, ex-Air Force pilot, lifelong registered Republican, Goldwater conservative, author of "George Dub-ya Bush, THE PHONY FIGHTER PILOT" and the creator/editor of the investigative website, www.King-George.biz.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» It's actually Posted by: WhatNow?
» RE: It's actually Posted by: DougScott
dick
Posted by: rtmyth on Feb 17, 2007 12:09 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If you want to know how a war gets jump- started read Mills "The Causes of World War Three". It's an old book but describes all the techniques now being used by the neocons.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Bush has done a wonderful job
Posted by: WhatNow? on Feb 17, 2007 12:42 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
for the proliferation of deadly weapons. I wonder how what kind of decrease in weapon expenditures there would have all over the world during bush's reign if we had not been so belligerent.

Who is the real threat? Israel spends 200 times more per capita on Military than Iran

I do not see the so called evil regimes spending anywhere near as much as the US. I do not see them bombing and killing anywhere near as many people as the US and it's coalition of warmongerers.

These Eisenhower quotes are as relavent today as ever:

"Every gun that is made, every warship launched, every rocket fired, signifies in the final sense a theft from those who hunger and are not fed, those who are cold and are not clothed." Dwight Eisenhower

"I hate war as only a soldier who has lived it can, only as one who has seen its brutality, its futility, its stupidity." Dwight Eisenhower

"I would rather try to persuade a man to go along, because once I have persuaded him, he will stick. If I scare him, he will stay just as long as he is scared, and then he is gone."
Dwight Eisenhower

"If men can develop weapons that are so terrifying as to make the thought of global war include almost a sentence for suicide, you would think that man's intelligence and his comprehension... would include also his ability to find a peaceful solution." Dwight Eisenhower

"In the councils of government, we must guard against the acquisition of unwarranted influence, whether sought or unsought, by the military-industrial complex. The potential for the disastrous rise of misplaced power exists and will persist." Dwight Eisenhower

"Only Americans can hurt America." Dwight Eisenhower

"The best morale exist when you never hear the word mentioned. When you hear a lot of talk about it, it's usually lousy." Dwight Eisenhower

"The problem in defense is how far you can go without destroying from within what you are trying to defend from without." Dwight Eisenhower

"This world of ours... must avoid becoming a community of dreadful fear and hate, and be, instead, a proud confederation of mutual trust and respect." Dwight Eisenhower


"Though force can protect in emergency, only justice, fairness, consideration and cooperation can finally lead men to the dawn of eternal peace." Dwight Eisenhower


"When people speak to you about a preventive war, you tell them to go and fight it. After my experience, I have come to hate war." Dwight Eisenhower


"You don't lead by hitting people over the head-that's assault, not leadership." Dwight Eisenhower

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Pick the first US Nuke Carrier to be hit
Posted by: Jersey Devil on Feb 17, 2007 10:17 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
When and if there is an air attack against Iran, you can bet that before the last bomb of the first unprovoked attack hits, the Iranian defense forces will launch anti-ship missiles targeting every US Aircraft Carrier off their coast. Multiple missiles targeting each ship should be a real test of King George's battle plan. Wipe out a couple of those billion dollar babies and then watch as Bush decides to "retaliate" by nuking Iran. Next stop World War III.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» It'll be the Eisenhower Posted by: lessbread
Iran Hardliners vs. Bush Hardliners
Posted by: boing007 on Feb 18, 2007 9:18 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
That's exactly what the Bush Adminstration wants. They're itching for a fight and what better way to succeed in their ploy than to rile up the hardliners in Iran. The Bush people don't give a hoot for moderate voices in the Middle East. They are an obstacle, not allies in a just cause. Oil, oil, oil.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]