Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
100 words for 100 days: submit your 100 word essay and get published on AlterNet
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

The Life and Times of Donald Rumsfeld

By Roger Morris, Tomdispatch.com. Posted February 21, 2007.


The political career of Donald Rumsfeld is vital for the understanding of what got us into the unprecedented ruin which is American foreign policy today.

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

More stories by Roger Morris

Get AlterNet in
your mailbox!

 
Advertisement

"... the finest Secretary of Defense this nation has ever had." -- Vice President Dick Cheney

"The past was not predictable when it started." -- Donald Rumsfeld

On a farewell flight to Baghdad in early December 2006, the departing Secretary of Defense reminisced about his start in politics more than forty years before. Aides leaned in to listen intently, but came away with no memorable revelations. It hardly mattered. As usual with this man who dominated government as no cabinet officer before him -- including the power-ravenous Henry Kissinger he so despised and outdid in effect, if not celebrity -- authentic history and Don Rumsfeld's version of it bore little resemblance.

There was portent in those beginnings. He came out of an affluent Chicago suburb in the 1950s with brusque confidence and usable contacts at Princeton, among them Frank Carlucci, a future Defense Secretary of mediocre mind, yet the iron conceit and shrewd fealty far more effectual in government than intellect or sensibility. After college and two years as a Navy pilot, Rumsfeld did politic stints as a Capitol Hill intern and Republican campaign aide, and by twenty-nine, back in Chicago in investment banking, was running for Congress.

As with much to come, a darker thread lay beneath the surface from the start. In a Republican primary tantamount to election, he was outwardly the boyish, speak-no-evil, underfunded, underdog challenger of an old party stalwart set to inherit the open seat. In fact, he was generously financed by wealthy friends, while his operatives -- including Jeb Stuart Magruder of later Watergate infamy -- furtively harried and smeared his opponent, using tactics never traced to Rumsfeld.

He went to Washington in December 1962 a handsome, square-jawed, safe-seat tribune from the North Shore's lakeside preserves, epitomized by the leafy estates of Winnetka and high-end Evanston. The old Thirteenth District of Illinois was one of the wealthiest in the nation and had been smoothly in Republican grip for most of a century. In the House, Rumsfeld was soon seen by some as he always saw himself -- a prodigy in the dull ranks of his Party.

Then, as afterward, he had no authentic qualifications or independent achievements. But that was always masked by the same muscular, aggressive style he took onto the mat as an Ivy League wrestler -- "sharp elbows," a meeker, envious colleague called it -- as well as by the flaccid banality of most of the GOP in the 1960s. The Republican Party Rumsfeld strode into was already caught between the wasting death of Eisenhower worldliness and moderation (with Richard Nixon's haunted succession in the wings) and a fitful right-wing urge to seize control that, in little more than a decade, would deliver the Reagan Reaction.

Rumsfeld's own rightist mentality, his New Deal-phobic corporatist cant and Cold War chauvinism, came dressed more in modish vigor than telltale substance -- and he was already attracted by a tough-minded layman's zeal for the era's pre-micro-processing but grandly prospering military technology. Like most of his generation born in the early 1930s, the scrap-drive, victory-bond children of World War II who came to govern the postwar world and would be the decisive elders of the post-9/11 era, he had no doubt about the natural nobility of America's sway or the invincibility of its arms; all this made ever sleeker, ever more irresistible by the demonstrable twin deities of American capitalism -- technology and "modern" management.

That, after all, was the unquestioned, unquestioning faith of North Shore fathers and other successes like them across the nation. That was the world, according to postwar Princeton, as well as Harvard Business School. That was the supposed genius of future Secretary of Defense Robert McNamara's duly quantified Ford Motor Company as well as his Vietnam-era "systems analysis" Pentagon, and so much more.

In the early 1960s, that received world ended just beyond the suites and suburbs. Given America's moral and material omnipotence, its exemplary excellence (so evident on the North Shore), the remainder of the planet required no particular exploration, knowledge, or historical-political understanding, nor did such men need to have the slightest recognition of America's own non-mythologized past. Alert decision-makers, busy with the numbered bottom-line results, had no time for such "academic" ephemera.

When money or force needed to be applied to Asians, Arabs, Latins, or Africans, a crisp briefing by some underling who had read the necessary memos would always do. Caught up as we all have been in Rumsfeld's kinetic, churlish descent into the bloody chaos of his Iraq, it has been easy to neglect how richly cultural it all was from the beginning -- America's haunted half-century of vast might and presumption set beside our still vaster ignorance and irresponsibility. It was in 1963, during Don Rumsfeld's first months in Congress, that the Iraqi Ba'ath Party -- since 1959 recruited, funded, marshaled and directed by the CIA, and trailing a twenty-six-year-old Tikriti street thug named Saddam Hussein (himself a CIA-paid assassin) along with lists of hundreds of left-leaning Iraqi political figures and professionals to be murdered after the coup -- seized power in Baghdad.

On Capitol Hill, the spirited young Republican legislator was then absorbed in exhilarating new appropriations in aeronautics and weaponry. His trademark clipped fervor and biting sarcasm in questions and speeches already held a hint of the Pentagon E-Ring canon four decades later: the superpower military as classic wrestler -- lithe, superbly equipped, swift to pin a dazed foe, dominant beyond doubt, and with garlands all around. It was only a matter -- he began to learn early from helpful briefings and testimony by military-industrial executives -- of making the commanders (the branch managers, after all) change their sluggish old ways. The by-word would be: Procure to prevail. So superior was new technology and the management that went with it that it scarcely mattered who the competitor might be. In those long-gone days, in obscure Washington hearings unheard, in colloquies before empty chambers, there were the first faint drums of distant disaster in the Hindu Kush, Mesopotamia, and beyond.


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: donald rumsfeld

Roger Morris, who served in the State Department and on the Senior Staff of the National Security Council under Presidents Johnson and Nixon. He is an award-winning historian and investigative journalist, including a National Book Award Silver Medal winner, and the author of books. His latest work, Shadows of the Eagle, will be published in 2007 by Knopf.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
The bottom line
Posted by: Darren7160 on Feb 21, 2007 4:03 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
A very interesting article on the life and times of Rumsfeld. The bottom line is the fact that he has used his bullying as a tactic to hide his intellectual weakness. His arrogance has prevented him for understanding his own shortcomings and using that knowledge to truly become an historical figure.

Anyone can take the American military into battle and defeat the enemy on the battlefield. Where intelligence comes in is in understanding that winning the war does not happen upon the defeat of the enemy on that field of battle! It did a hundred years ago when wars were fought between dynastic families... but not today.

As presented in the article, a tragic and fatal contempt for others was a root-cause of the problem. Many deride the term "multi-culturalism" and believe that all people are motivated by the same wants, needs and desires. Those who live in the insulated world of their own beliefs cannot see any other way. Thus, they are completely unable to predict and prepare for people who do not think like they do.

It has been the fatal flaw of Rumsfeld and his fellow travelers at AEI and PNAC! Their belief that simply by defeating the Iraqi military everything else would fall into place. Regardless of the warnings of those who knew better.

That is why I hold Rumsfeld personally responsible for the failure of Iraq. No one can say he wasn't told, that no one could predict that this would happen. To try to defend him with such banal defenses is to show that one is uninformed and intentionally ignorant of what happened during the lead up to the war.

People did know! People did speak out and tell them what would happen!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

THIS COMBAT VETERAN SAYS PROSECUTE RUMSFELD
Posted by: kc10ken on Feb 21, 2007 5:10 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
DON'T LET HIM GET AWAY!

I mean it. DO NOT let this LYING, THIEVING and CONNIVING BASTARD of a MEGLOMANIAC slip into the annuls of history to be forgotten.

RUMSFELD above all others, is responsible for dumbya's QUAGMIRE in Iraq. He is DIRECTLY RESPONSIBLE for the majority of US Casualties incurred.

When I served in the Army one of the FIRST things I learned in basic training was that when our army invades another country, the FIRST thing we do is we secure all enemy military installations and ammo dumps. This is standard Army SOP. We do this to prevent our enemy from continuing to kill us.

When the chickenhawks ordered the invasion of Iraq, Donald Rumsfeld ordered our troops to SECURE THE OIL FIELDS. That, in and of itself, tells much about the reason for invading Iraq.

Left wide open for months, Husseins former military installations and ammo dumps were looted of over 280,000 tons of military grade high explosives. That's enough for 150 IED attacks per day against Americans for the next 250 years. The majority of US casualities sustained in Iraq are due to IED's.

Donald Rumsfeld is responsible for this.

He MUST be prosecuted for this violation of basic military operational procedures that has resulted in the deaths of over 3200 American soldiers.

DO NOT LET THIS BASTARD FADE AWAY!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

What a Snooze
Posted by: JMorse on Feb 21, 2007 5:56 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The article drips as much conceit as Rumsfeld. Everything the writer said could have been stated in five paragraphs without one adjective.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Pre-emption
Posted by: eddie torres on Feb 21, 2007 8:01 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
How does America spot the future Rumsfelds BEFORE they take office and wreak havoc?

Easy. The wars-of-choice of 2020 will be organized and implemented by the disciples of the organizers of TODAY's wars-of-choice. Look down the chain-of-command at least 5 levels from Rumsfeld - and 'permanently fire' everyone on that list. Peosecute and convict them of multiple felonies - failure to file an accurate tax return, irregular hiring practices, false expense reports, etc - and they'll be liabilities for any future employer.

If this had been done during Iran-Contra, 'guys' like Poindexter, Abrams, Armitage, Feith, Ledeen and all the other 'operators' would have been on much shorter leashes. And Rumsfeld would not have had his army of clones to command.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Well Done
Posted by: NoPCZone on Feb 21, 2007 8:20 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Best written and researched article I have seen here in my memory.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Research Posted by: hbw
Book on Rumsfeld
Posted by: fanny666 on Feb 21, 2007 8:47 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
link

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Bravo!
Posted by: ScottP on Feb 21, 2007 8:57 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This is why we check out alternet, real information instead of the MSM platituded. As someone who worked for the DoD for over a decade before quitting in disgust after the Gulf War, I concur with the impression of Rumsfeld and Cheney as brutal sadists. The deeper you dig, the worse it gets.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

This Article Needs...
Posted by: motamanx on Feb 21, 2007 9:43 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...a wider audience. I urge all who read it to pass it along.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Down With All The Repubs...
Posted by: bob t on Feb 21, 2007 10:50 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
... this very same thing will happen again and again via the rethugs, thugs and bullies.
All of this death and destruction by the so called Pro-Lifers who are really Pro-Death. Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld all came from the repub party scum. We and our dead and maimed troops all got Rummy from Nixon(where else, and another rethug scum) then Ford, then Reagan, next Bush41 and finally Bush43. And I hope we are finally rid of this creep.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

A few missing chapters
Posted by: rwa on Feb 21, 2007 11:30 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
#1 On September 10, 2001, Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld held a press conference to disclose that over $2,000,000,000,000 in Pentagon funds could not be accounted for. Rumsfeld stated: "According to some estimates we cannot track $2.3 trillion in transactions." 1 Such a disclosure normally would have sparked a huge scandal. However, the commencement of the attack on New York City and Washington in the morning would assure that the story remained buried.

#2 Donald Rumsfeld has made a killing out of bird flu. The US Defence Secretary has made more than $5m (£2.9m) in capital gains from selling shares in the biotechnology firm that discovered and developed Tamiflu, the drug being bought in massive amounts by Governments to treat a possible human pandemic of the disease.
http://news.independent.co.uk/world/americas/article350787

Experts dismiss scare over bird flu:
"If anything is contagious right now, it's judgment clouded by fear." ... "For it to become dangerous to humans, it has to go through a pretty significant genetic change. If you put this in perspective, it's not going to happen."
gainesville.com

#3 I would like to call your attention to when Donald Rumsfeld was CEO of Searle, manufacturers of aspartame. For 16 years the FDA refused to approve it, not only because its not safe but because they wanted the company indicted for fraud.
Donald Rumsfeld was on President Reagan's transition team and the day after he took office he appointed an FDA Commissioner who would approve aspartame. The FDA set up a Board of Inquiry of the best scientists they had to offer, who said aspartame is not safe and causes brain tumors, and the petition for approval is hereby revoked. The new FDA Commissioner, Arthur Hull Hayes, over-ruled that Board of Inquiry and then went to work for the PR Agency of the manufacturer, Burson-Marsteller, at a rumored $1000.00 a day, and has refused to talk to the press ever since. Read the whole story of the history of aspartame at http://www.wnho.net/history_of_aspartame.htm

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

WOW Great info....
Posted by: Michiganman on Feb 21, 2007 5:52 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I feel like I just read the history of germany in the first two world wars. Just substitute the name Goering for rumsfeld and hitler for bush!!!

WE MUST END THIS CRAP!!!!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Hey..
Posted by: JoshuaLudd on Feb 22, 2007 7:47 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Hey, Alternet.. thanks for the in depth article on Rummy... AFTER HE HAS LEFT HIS POST!!!!!

How timely.

Part of the reason this nation is falling apart.. part of the reason it is ruled by idiots, sycophants, the wealthy, and other assorted bloodsuckers and chair moisteners is because of "progressives" who aren't willing to be tough on these dolts until it is politically safe to do so and who aren't willing to address anything even approaching the realities of the world we live in today.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

How Appropriate--Rummy As Hit Man!
Posted by: Richard Dudgeon on Feb 22, 2007 9:02 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Remarkably insightful and well written article.
It’s essence is this: at two critical points in the history of the American military (when the debacles of Vietnam and Iraq became irrefutable), the Secretary of Defense was an insular, indurate, outright callous Republican lackey whose manifest abilities as a hatchet man have guaranteed him continual employment among the upper ranks of the pool of reliable GOP assassins whom the current leader can call to arms to dismantle or obliterate some institution considered odious by the right wing.
Was it intentional that at these two critical junctures, when the military might have engaged in some meaningful introspection and exorcised the ghost of Vietnam (not to mention the ghost of Vietnam-yet-to-come, Iraq!) the man in charge of the Pentagon considered self questioning the intellectual equivalent of seppuku? Was Secretary of Defense really a reward for a dedicated underling’s toil, or another assignment?
The right wing animus is visceral, a pastiche of apparently contradictory impulses: Bible thumping, flag waving, and saber rattling, with a dash of end-times, Apocalyptic, clash-of-civilizations spice thrown in for flavoring post 9/11. Introspection presumes doubt; doubt, as any steely eyed, granite jawed, slope browed conservative can tell you, is for wimps, liberals, academics and other testosterone challenged defectives. Real men don’t doubt; they blow stuff up. This may be why it seems to take the right wing so long to learn things; in order to learn, you must first question. They don’t seem to take that first step until batted in the head by some blunt instrument, like November 7, 2006 by way of example.
History may or may not deem Dubya the worst president; he must be place in some kind of historical context to garner that moniker. Certainly, he’s the worst in the span of my life, and, arguably, the worst in the last century. Thirty years from now, when we’re still trying to undo the mess Dubya’s made of the whole middle east, historians will ask, as they now ask about Vietnam, how we could have been this stupid, to have embraced in our blind panic this odious little man and his equally odious flunkies, of whom Rummy will shine as one of the more resplendent examples.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]