Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

Assassinations, Terrorist Strikes and Ethnic Cleansing: Bush's Shadow War in Iraq

By Chris Floyd, TruthOut.org. Posted February 15, 2007.


The constant sectarian violence in Iraq is not purely of domestic origin -- much of it is directed by covert U.S. and British military: Here is Bush's other war in Iraq.

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

In Special Coverage

Belief:
Why I Want to Turn Religious People Into Atheists
Greta Christina

Corporate Accountability and WorkPlace:
Don't Fear the Deficit Bogeyman
John Miller

DrugReporter:
The War on Weed: Marijuana Is Basically Harmless -- The Monumentally Stupid Drug War Is Not
Jim Hightower

Environment:
White House Garden Won't Make Up for Obama's Nomination of Pesticide Lobbyist for US Chief Agriculture Negotiator
Jill Richardson

Food:
Don't Be Scared of Food: Are We Being Needlessly Hysterical About Food Safety?
David E. Gumpert

Health and Wellness:
47,000 Women Could Die As a Result of the New Mammogram Guidelines
George Lakoff

Immigration:
Hate Group, FAIR, Is Looking for "Ethnically Ambiguous" Actors to Amplify Its Racism
Adam Luna

Media and Technology:
The Memory Scrub About Why Ft. Hood Happened Is Almost Complete ... If It Weren't for Archives
Mark Ames

Movie Mix:
The Yes Men: Pranksters Out to Fix the World
Mark Engler

Politics:
White House's Ties to Health Care Industry Deeper Than Visitor Records Show
Daniela Perdomo

Reproductive Justice and Gender:
Why Can't We Look Away From Sarah Palin?
Vanessa Richmond

Rights and Liberties:
Citing "National Defense Needs," Obama Administration Says it Won't Sign Ban on Land Mines
Amy Goodman

Sex and Relationships:
Hot Mormon Muffins and Models for Jesus: What's With All the Sexy Christians?
Liz Langley

Take Action:
G-20 Meetings: Nothing Much Happened in the Suites, and There Was Too Much Punch in the Streets
Laura Flanders

Water:
Poseidon's Financial Shell Game: Why Is a Private Desalination Plant Asking for Public Money?
Peter Gleick

World:
Is Obama Following in the Footsteps of Bill Clinton?
Jeff Cohen

More stories by Chris Floyd

Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

Imagine a city torn by sectarian strife. Competing death squads roam the streets; terrorists stage horrific attacks. Local authority is distrusted and weak; local populations protect the extremists in their midst, out of loyalty or fear. A bristling military occupation exacerbates tensions at every turn, while offering prime targets for bombs and snipers. And behind the scenes, in a shadow world of double-cross and double-bluff, covert units of the occupying power run agents on both sides of the civil war, countenancing -- and sometimes directing -- assassinations, terrorist strikes, torture sessions, and ethnic cleansing.

Is this a portrait of Belfast during "The Troubles" in Northern Ireland? Or a picture of Baghdad today? It is both; and in both cases, one of Britain's most secret -- and most criminally compromised -- military units has plied its trade in the darkness, "turning" and controlling terrorist killers in a dangerous bid to wring actionable intelligence from blood and betrayal. And America's covert soldiers are right there with them, working side-by-side with their British comrades in the aptly named "Task Force Black," the UK's Sunday Telegraph reports.

Last week, the right-wing, pro-war paper published an early valentine to the "Joint Support Group," the covert unit whose bland name belies its dramatic role at the center of the Anglo-American "dirty war" in Iraq. In gushing, lavish, uncritical prose that could have been (and perhaps was) scripted by the unit itself, the Telegraph lauded the team of secret warriors as "one of the Coalition's most effective and deadly weapons in the fight against terror," running "dozens of Iraqi double agents," including "members of terrorist groups."

What the story fails to mention is the fact that in its Ulster incarnation, the JSG -- then known as the Force Research Unit (FRU) -- actively colluded in the murder of at least 15 civilians by Loyalist deaths squads, and an untold number of victims were killed, maimed, and tortured by the many Irish Republican Army double-agents controlled by the unit. What's more, the man who commanded the FRU during the height of its depredations -- Lt. Col. Gordon Kerr -- is in Baghdad now, heading the hugger-mugger Special Reconnaissance Regiment (SRR), a large counter-terrorism force made up of unnamed "existing assets" from the glory days in Northern Ireland and elsewhere.

This despite the fact that a 10-year, $100 million investigation by Britain's top police officer, Lord Stevens, confirmed in 2003 that the Kerr-led FRU "sanctioned killings" through "institutionalized collusion" with both Protestant and Catholic militias during the 1980s and 1990s. Stevens sent dossiers of evidence against Kerr and 20 other security apparatchiks to the Blair government's Director of Public Prosecutions, in the expectation that the fiery Scotsman and the others would be put on trial.

But instead prosecuting Kerr, Blair promoted him: first to a plum assignment as British military attaché in Beijing -- effectively the number two man in all of UK military intelligence, as Scotland's Sunday Herald notes, then, with the SRR posting to Baghdad, where Kerr and his former FRU mates now apply the "methods developed on the mean streets of Ulster during the Troubles," as the Telegraph breathlessly relates.

The Telegraph puff piece is naturally coy about revealing these methods, beyond the fact that, as in Ireland, the JSG uses "a variety of inducements ranging from blackmail to bribes" to turn Iraqi terrorists into Coalition agents. So, to get a better idea of the techniques employed by the group in Baghdad, we must return to those "mean streets of Ulster" and the unit's reign of terror and collusion there, which has been thoroughly documented not only by the exhaustive Stevens inquiries, but also in a remarkable series of investigative reports by the Sunday Herald's Neil Mackay, and in extensive stories by the BBC, the Guardian, the Independent, the Times and others.

We will also see how the operations of the JSG and "Task Force Black" dovetail with U.S. efforts to apply the lessons of its own dirty wars -- such as the "Salvador Option" -- to Iraq, as well as long-running Bush Administration initiatives to arm and fund "friendly" militias while infiltrating terrorist groups in order to "provoke them into action." It is indeed a picture painted in black, a glimpse at the dark muck that lies beneath the high-flown rhetoric about freedom and civilization forever issuing from the lips of the war leaders.

Whacking for the Peelers

Gregory Burns had a problem. He was one of Gordon Kerr's FRU informers planted deep inside the IRA, along with two of his friends, Johnny Dignam and Aidan Starrs. But as Mackay noted in a February 2003 story, the already-partnered Burns had acquired a girlfriend on the side, Margaret Perry, 26, a "civilian" Catholic with no paramilitary ties. Forbidden fruit is sweet, of course -- but pillow talk is dangerous for an inside man. "Burns didn't keep his mouth shut and [Perry] found out he was working for British intelligence," an FRU officer told Mackay. "He tried to convince her he was a double-agent the IRA had planted in the [British] army -- but she didn't buy it."

Burns called his FRU handlers and asked to come in from the cold. He'd been compromised, he said, and now he and his friends needed to get out, with new identities, relocation, good jobs -- the usual payoff for trusted agents when the jig was up. But Kerr refused: "He said [Burns] should silence Perry," the FRU man told Mackay. Burns, panicking at thought of the IRA's horrific retributions against informers, insisted: he would have to kill the woman if they didn't bring him in, he told Kerr. Again Kerr refused.

And so Burns arranged a meeting with his lover, to "talk over" the situation. His friends, Aidan and Johnny, volunteered to drive her there: "On the way, they pulled into a forest, beat her to death and buried her in a shallow grave," Mackay notes. Two years later, when her body was found, the IRA put two and two together -- and slowly tortured Burns and his two friends to death, after first extracting copious amounts of information about British intelligence operations in Ireland.

"In Kerr's eyes, Burns just wasn't important enough to resettle," the FRU source told the Sunday Herald. "So we ended up with four unnecessary deaths and the compromising of British army intelligence officers, which ultimately put soldiers' lives at risk. To Kerr, it was always a matter of the ends justifying the means."

Then again, Kerr could well afford to sacrifice a few informers here and there to the wrath of the IRA's dreaded "security unit" -- because his own, prize double agent was the head of that security unit. Codenamed "Stakeknife," Kerr's man presided over, and sometimes administered, the grisly torture-murders of up to 50 men during his tenure in the IRA's upper ranks. The victims included other British double agents who were sacrificed in order to protect Stakeknife's cover, as the Guardian and many other UK papers reported when the agent's work was revealed in 2003. ("Stakeknife" was later identified in the press as Alfredo Scappaticci -- an Irishman despite the Italian name, although he continues to deny the charge.)

The FRU also "knowingly allowed soldiers, [police] officers and civilians to die at the hands of IRA bombers in order to protect republican double agents," the Sunday Herald's investigations found. As Mackay reports: "FRU sources said around seven police and army personnel died as a result of military intelligence allowing IRA bombs to be placed during Kerr's time in command of the FRU. They estimate that three civilians also died this way, with casualties in the hundreds."

But some of the worst excesses came from the FRU's handling of operatives on the other side, in the fiercely pro-British Protestant militia the Ulster Defense Association (UDA). Here, among the Loyalists, Kerr's top double agent was Brian Nelson, who became head of intelligence for the UDA. As John Ware put it in the Guardian: "Kerr regarded Nelson as his jewel in the crown ... For the next three years [from 1987], Nelson colluded with murder gangs to shoot IRA suspects. Month after month, armed and masked men crashed into homes. Sometimes they got the wrong address or shot the wrong person."

A wrong person like Gerald Slane, a 27-year-old Belfast man shot down in front of his three children. A gun had been found dumped on his property; this, and his Catholicism, was enough to get him assassinated at the order of Kerr's man Nelson. Afterwards, it was found that Slane had no IRA connections.

Another "wrong person" killed by the FRU's agents was the Belfast attorney Pat Finucane, who was shot 14 times in front of his wife and children. Finucane was a civil rights activist who had defended both Catholics and Protestants, but was considered an IRA sympathizer by Loyalists -- and a thorn in the side by British authorities. He was killed at Nelson's order by a fellow FRU informer in the UDA, Ken Barrett, who was convicted of the murder but freed last year as part of an amnesty program in the Northern Ireland peace process. Barrett was unapologetic about his FRU "wetwork" on Finucane. "The peelers [authorities] wanted him whacked," he told a BBC documentary team after his release. "We whacked him and that is the end of the story."

Kerr gave Nelson packages of intelligence files to help facilitate the assassination of UDA targets, including at least four "civilians" with no IRA ties, the Stevens inquiry found. The FRU also obtained "restriction orders" from other British security and military units in Northern Ireland, whereby they would pull their forces from an area when Kerr's UDA agents were going to make a hit there, allowing the killers to get in and get out without hindrance, investigator Nick Davies reports.

Yet the FRU was wary of sharing its own intelligence with other security services -- which was the ostensible reason for running the double-agents in the first place. Instead, Kerr engaged in fierce turf wars with other agencies, while "stovepiping" much of his intelligence to the top circles of the UK government, including the cabinet-level Intelligence Committee chaired by then-Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher. Indeed, when Nelson was finally exposed and brought to trial on five counts of conspiracy to commit murder, Kerr testified in his behalf, noting for the court that Nelson's intelligence "product and his reporting was passed through the intelligence community and at a high level, and from that point of view he has to be considered a very important agent."

As one FRU man told Mackay: "Under Kerr's command...the mindset was one of 'the right people would be allowed to live and wrong people should die.'"

This is the "mindset" now operating in the heart of the Green Zone in Baghdad, where the JSG is carrying out -- as we are told in glowing terms -- precisely the same mission it had in Ulster. a unit which has allowed its agents to torture, murder and commit acts of terrorism, including actions that killed local civilians and the soldiers and intelligence operatives of their own country.

The White House Green Light

Of course, Kerr and his Baghdad black-op crew are not alone in the double-dealing world of Iraqi counterinsurgency. The Pentagon's ever-expanding secret armies are deeply enmeshed in such efforts as well. As Sy Hersh has reported ("The Coming Wars," New Yorker, Jan. 24, 2005), after his re-election in 2004, George W. Bush signed a series of secret presidential directives that authorized the Pentagon to run virtually unrestricted covert operations, including a reprise of the American-backed, American-trained death squads employed by authoritarian regimes in Central and South America during the Reagan Administration, where so many of the Bush faction cut their teeth.

"Do you remember the right-wing execution squads in El Salvador?" a former high-level intelligence official said to Hersh. "We founded them and we financed them. The objective now is to recruit locals in any area we want. And we aren't going to tell Congress about it." A Pentagon insider added: "We're going to be riding with the bad boys." Another role model for the expanded dirty war cited by Pentagon sources, said Hersh, was Britain's brutal repression of the Mau Mau in Kenya during the 1950s, when British forces set up concentration camps, created their own terrorist groups to confuse and discredit the insurgency, and killed thousands of innocent civilians in quashing the uprising.

Bush's formal green-lighting of the death-squad option built upon an already securely-established base, part of a larger effort to turn the world into a "global free-fire zone" for covert operatives, as one top Pentagon official told Hersh. For example, in November 2002 a Pentagon plan to infiltrate terrorist groups and "stimulate" them into action was uncovered by William Arkin, then writing for the Los Angeles Times. The new unit, the "Proactive, Pre-emptive Operations Group," was described in the Pentagon documents as "a super-Intelligence Support Activity" that brings "together CIA and military covert action, information warfare, intelligence and cover and deception."

Later, in August 2004, then deputy Pentagon chief Paul Wolfowitz appeared before Congress to ask for $500 million to arm and train non-governmental "local militias" to serve as U.S. proxies for "counter-insurgency and "counterterrorist" operations in "ungoverned areas" and hot spots around the world, Agence France Presse (and virtually no one else) reported at the time. These hired paramilitaries were to be employed in what Wolfowitz called an "arc of crisis" that just happened to stretch across the oil-bearing lands and strategic pipeline routes of Central Asia, the Middle East, Africa and South America.

By then, the Bush Administration had already begun laying the groundwork for an expanded covert war in the hot spot of Iraq. In November 2003, it created a "commando squad" drawn from the sectarian militias of five major Iraqi factions, as the Washington Post reported that year. Armed, funded and trained by the American occupation forces, and supplied with a "state-of-the-art command, control and communications center" from the Pentagon, the new Iraqi commandos were loosed on the then-nascent Iraqi insurgency -- despite the very prescient fears of some U.S. officials "that various Sunni or Shiite factions could eventually use the service to secretly undermine their political competitors," as the Post noted.

And indeed, in early 2005 -- not long after Bush's directives loosed the "Salvador Option" on Iraq -- the tide of death-squad activity began its long and bloody rise to the tsunami-like levels we see today. Ironically, the first big spike of mass torture-murders, chiefly in Sunni areas at the time, coincided with "Operation Lightning," a much ballyhooed effort by American and Iraqi forces to "secure" Baghdad. The operation featured a mass influx of extra troops into the capital; dividing the city into manageable sectors, then working through them one by one; imposing hundreds of checkpoints to lock down all insurgent movements; and establishing a 24-hour presence of security and military forces in troubled neighborhoods, the Associated Press reported in May 2005. In other words, it was almost exactly the same plan now being offered as Bush's "New Way Forward," the controversial "surge."

But the "Lightning" fizzled in a matter of weeks, and the death squads grew even bolder. Brazen daylight raids by "men dressed in uniforms" of Iraqi police or Iraqi commandos or other Iraqi security agencies swept up dozens of victims at a time. For months, U.S. "advisers" to Iraqi security agencies -- including veterans of the original "Salvador Option" -- insisted that these were Sunni insurgents in stolen threads, although many of the victims were Sunni civilians. Later, the line was changed: the chief culprits were now "rogue elements" of the various sectarian militias that had "infiltrated" Iraq's institutions.

But as investigative reporter Max Fuller has pointed out in his detailed examination of information buried in reams of mainstream news stories and public Pentagon documents, the vast majority of atrocities then attributed to "rogue" Shiite and Sunni militias were in fact the work of government-controlled commandos and "special forces," trained by Americans, "advised" by Americans and run largely by former CIA agents. As Fuller puts it: "If there are militias in the Ministry of Interior, you can be sure that they are militias that stand to attention whenever a U.S. colonel enters the room." And perhaps a British lieutenant colonel as well.

With the Anglo-American coalition so deeply embedded in dirty war -- infiltrating terrorist groups, "stimulating" them into action," protecting "crown jewel" double-agents no matter what the cost, "riding with the bad boys," greenlighting the "Salvador Option" -- it is simply impossible to determine the genuine origin of almost any particular terrorist outrage or death squad atrocity in Iraq. All of these operations take place in the shadow world, where terrorists are sometimes government operatives and vice versa, and where security agencies and terrorist groups interpenetrate in murky thickets of collusion and duplicity. This moral chaos leaves "a kind of blot/to mark the full-fraught man and best indued/With some suspicion," as Shakespeare's Henry V says.

What's more, the "intelligence" churned out by this system is inevitably tainted by the self-interest, mixed motives, fear and criminality of those who provide it. The ineffectiveness of this approach can be seen in the ever-increasing, many-sided civil war that is tearing Iraq apart. If these covert operations really are intended to quell the violence, they clearly have had the opposite effect. If they have some other intention, the pious defenders of civilization -- who approve these activities with promotions, green lights and unlimited budgets -- aren't telling.

Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: iraq, secret war, covert operations

Chris Floyd’s work has appeared in print and online in venues all over the world.. He is the author of Empire Burlesque: High Crimes and Low Comedy in the Bush Imperium, and is co-founder and writer/editor of the political blog, Empire Burlesque. He can be reached at cfloyd72@gmail.com.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Yes, that's right, Black Ops in Iraq
Posted by: LeftWright on Feb 15, 2007 1:18 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
brought to Iraqis by the same people who perpetrated 9/11.

And it isn't "al Qaeda."

You're getting closer to the truth every day, AlterNet.

Just connect the dots, people.

The truth shall set us free. Love is the only way forward.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Nothing is beyond this bunch Posted by: cold2touch
We are our own worst enemies...
Posted by: Plenum on Feb 15, 2007 4:01 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Madness, absolute madness -

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

why no outrage from congress?
Posted by: xgroverx on Feb 15, 2007 6:45 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
These type of covert atrocities have been carried out by the US and other western nations for the better part of a half century, yet there never seems to be any mention of them from 'our' representatives. It is implausible that they do/didn't have knowledge, therefore their silence only shows that they were either approvingly complicit or too scared to take a stand. The type of actions that have been carried out in the past in El Salvador and Nicaragua, among others, and now in Iraq, are the antithesis of the ideals of democracy and freedom our leaders espouse. It is time for the American people to take a stand against the injustices that are perpetrated by our government and their proxies. We can't stand by and expect our corrupt and/or timid representatives (in both parties) to take a stand for us because they won't. They don't represent us and they never will.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: why no outrage from congress? Posted by: monkeywrench
Chriss Floyd Tortured Past: It Didn't Start With Dubya
Posted by: rwa on Feb 15, 2007 7:38 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
February 14, 2007

...with the distinct possibility of a Democratic administration taking its place, it becomes increasingly important to remind ourselves of the bipartisan nature of the policies that the Bushists have promoted so ruthlessly during their time at the top. The only thing radical about Bush-Cheney statecraft has been the brazenness and crudity with which they have pursued long-standing goals and practices of the American Establishment. While it is certainly true that even a slight mitigation of the Bush Regime's depredations would be a welcome relief, those who look to any Establishment-embraced Democrat for a wholesale transformation of the arrogant, ignorant and brutal assumptions that have directed the exercise of American power in the world for many decades will likely be in for bitter disappointment...

http://www.uruknet.info/?p=m30648&hd=&size=1&l=e

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Again "our boys"
Posted by: paschn on Feb 15, 2007 7:46 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
People in high places,.... Evil ruthless, selfish. In the Bush/Cheney example, we have found the missing 2 "womb" mates to Satan.
But consider this;
These swine on their own embody not only the traits above. They are cowards, spoiled torturers of little wild things. So how do they accomplish all the mayhem and death? Does the term "lackey" come to mind?
Through out history we see bright examples of leaders who accomplish horrible things. Unlike Bush / Cheney et al they were not all cowards. But they were still able to rise to the occasion and accomplish much to the pain of we common brotherhood of man.
Because they had access to lackeys. amoral dogs who seem to wait for an excuse to excel in mindlessly following the orders of swine like them.
Maybe, instead of putting "support our troops" stickers on your cars' asses, you should put "EDUCATE our troops" stickers there?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Again "our boys" Posted by: starvinmarvy
The US Administration is backed by the MSM which in turn is backed by the pro-Israel financiers.
Posted by: werewolf on Feb 15, 2007 7:47 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
..And when you have such a strong backing no Democrat can effectively oppose the Administration. The US Administration is the tool of US Corporations which is comprised of Trillion dollar Oil companies and Armament industires. Against such mighty forces how can one expect the opposition Democrats to confront the Aministration effectively?

Who can the Democrats depend when the carpets are pulled under their feet by these powerful corporations? Nobody! And the smart Democrats know that only too well when they saw their compatriots fail to make it to Congress for having dared to oppose the pro-Israel lobby, AIPAC which has strong links to these powerful corporations and the MSM!
.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Amen Posted by: cold2touch
Its the unholy alliance's strategy to divide & rule
Posted by: tashi on Feb 15, 2007 7:50 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It has been obvious for a long time that Israeli vision of a fragmented, divided ME helps the two major special interest groups that make up the American ruling elite
1. Israel benefits from fragmented ME to realize its dream of 'Eretz Israel' as arabs would be too busy infighting to counter Israeli expansionist goals.
2. Benefits the military industrial complex and the oil companies - In the last 6 years alone, the profits of these interest groups have jumped incredibly. War, after all, is a very lucrative business.

All you have to do is look at the policies peddled by AEI. Iraq war is the brainchild of AEI (PNAC). AEI is also involved in massive disinformation campaign about global warming. It has been reported that Exxon Mobil has given a considerable amount of funding to AEI.
Now AEI is promoting war against Iran. Listen to right-wing nut jobs like Laura Ingram, and you'll find either an AEI hack or some Israeli official/politician pushing fro war against Iran these days.
Few weeks back there was a little segment on global warming on NPR. A scientist was justifying the scientific community's consensus on the reality of global warming. Providing the counter argument was a hack from AEI. What the hell is a hack from AEI debating a scientist on the merits of global warming!!!

For the longest time I couldn't bring myself to think that 9/11 was anything other than the official stated policy i.e the work of Alqaeda. But just looking at the parties who are benefiting from the aftermath of 9/11: Israel, which has been advocating a fragemented ME for decades, and Industrial/Oil companies.
Using the the so-called 'think-tank' which is really a PR & disinformation firm. PNAC needed a 'new pearl harbor' to get the American public behind in its quest for world domination:

American Free Press asked Christopher Maletz, assistant director of the PNAC about what was meant by the need for “a new Pearl Harbor.”

“They needed more money to up the defense budget for raises, new arms, and future capabilities,” Maletz said. “Without some disaster or catastrophic event” neither the politicians nor the military would have approved, Maletz said.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Neo-Nazi rally was organized by FBI informant
Posted by: rwa on Feb 15, 2007 7:51 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Henry Pierson Curtis | Sentinel Staff Writer
Posted February 15, 2007

A paid FBI informant was the man behind a neo-Nazi march through the streets of Parramore that stirred up anxiety in Orlando's black community and fears of racial unrest that triggered a major police mobilization.

That revelation came Wednesday in an unrelated federal court hearing and has prompted outrage from black leaders, some of whom demanded an investigation into whether the February 2006 march was, itself, an event staged by law-enforcement agencies.

The FBI would not comment on what it knew about the involvement of its informant, 39-year-old David Gletty of Orlando, in the neo-Nazi event. In court Wednesday, an FBI agent said the bureau has paid its informant at least $20,000 during the past two years.

"Wow," Gletty said when reached by phone late Wednesday. "It is what it is. You were there in court. I can't really go into any detail now."

Orlando City Councilwoman Daisy Lynum, whose district includes the march route west of Interstate 4, said she wants to know who was behind the march, the neo-Nazis or the FBI and other law-enforcement agencies.

"If it was staged, I would feel very uncomfortable and would ask for a full-scale investigation," Lynum said. "To come into a predominantly black community which could have resulted in great harm to the black community? I would hate to be part of a game. It's a mockery to the community for someone else to be playing a game with the community."

full article:
orlandosentinel.com/news/local

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Just when you think Iraq couldn't get any worse...
Posted by: MTguy on Feb 15, 2007 9:14 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This is some mighty depressing news here, people. However if you think about the illegal secret wiretapping here at home, the Guantanamo detainees and their inability to defend themselves against their accusers... it all adds up. I mean, why should Iraq be any different than America since we're the occupiers?

If this is how America conducts herself on foreign soil, it's difficult for me to be proud that I'm an American. Regardless of how Iraq turns out in the end, I'll blame George Bush for the trashing of America in the eyes of the world when we used to be the country who tried to do the right thing.

No longer.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

What's the real agenda behind these operations?
Posted by: thoughtcriminal on Feb 15, 2007 9:18 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It all comes back to George W. Bush's definition of 'success' in Iraq - what does Karl Rove's "permanent Republican majority" hope to achieve in Iraq?

It seems that a central goal has always been to destroy Iraq and turn it into three separate provinces - Kurdish north, Sunni west, and Shia south. The Republican vision was based on the wishes of the oil & big business sectors, who essentially wanted to privatize Iraq, and turn it into some kind of free enterpise zone.

The people of Iraq and the neighboring countries don't like the vision of permanent militray occupation of their region of the world, however - that should be clear enough by now. The new goal seems to be to terrify the locals into submission by setting up security forces whose primary loyalty is to the puppet Iraqi parliament - and the 'hydrocarbon law' provisions remain as secretive as ever, though the outcome is predictable:


www.huffingtonpost.com: bob cesca: iraqi hydrocarbon law:

So here's a thumbnail of what we could be facing in the coming months and years.

--After the hydrocarbon law is passed, an enormous influx in Big Oil lobbyists and negotiators will certainly ride into Baghdad like well-dressed ticks clinging tenaciously to the necks of our soldiers -- thirsty and driven to apply an onslaught of coercive pressure on the weak and vulnerable Iraqi government. Their goal: to attain epic deals not unlike the ones previewed by the apparently defunct PSAs

--As huge oil profits are fleeced from the Iraqi people by Western multinationals, insurgents will be further motivated to continue the civil war. Presuming that security will dictate Big Oil's level of activity in Baghdad, the violence won't be as significant there but you can count on continued and increased bloodshed in Anbar province and elsewhere.

--The Sunnis, who lack any real oil, and their allies in al-Qaeda will be further motivated to seek revenge on Western and Shi'ite targets inside and outside of Iraq. American soldiers and Iraqi civilians will continue to be caught in the middle of it all -- at least until 2009, with blowback stretching deep into the future.

Tell me again, Bush Republicans, how this isn't about oil. Tell me again, Bush Republicans, how this helps to end the civil war and prevents further terrorism.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Games with games
Posted by: redbrownandblueparty on Feb 15, 2007 9:33 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I think leftwright nailed it with the first comment and I agree with what followed. A great article. This site is doing a service to a cause I support. Glad to have found this community which has a heads up on truth.

I know it sounds fantastic and flaky, but "doing my bit," an Irish term, is to start a new government and political party. I'm Irish and my Irish is up. What the Brits did to us is well...you know the story. And now the Brit-Amerikan axis moves its WASP agenda from N. Ireland to the Mideast.

I've had it with the white male consciousness. It has fallen so low that it doesn't even come up to the level of "corruption." Religious terminology is passe but evil, satan, and hell-like words have a point. WE THE PEOPLE are in a spiritual war, like it or not.

My government is called The Lover Government and my party is called the Red Brown and Blue Party. Love is the Center that holds. I intend to co-opt and respin the Amerikan flag with earth and people colors. I won't bore you with the details. The devil in the details is at last being uncovered in sites like this, and I'm preparing to do battle with a tool mightier than the sword, ala Thomas Paine.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Games with games Posted by: HuckFinn
Bringing Ulster to Iraq Part I
Posted by: Conchobhar on Feb 15, 2007 1:38 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As one who has watched developments in the Six Counties over the last 30 some years, I was bitterly amused that some said the Brits' experience in Northern Ireland would prove helpful in Iraq.
No one seemed to focus on the fact that they couldn't militarily defeat an organization that never had more than 400 volunteers in the field, in a province that was 12 miles from England. Dirty truths about state sponsored terrorism have come to light, and some of the perpetrators are now in Iraq, as "security consultants," which is an euphemism for mercenary.

By coincidence, this arrived in my inbox this afternoon.

PFC ACTION ALERT...Please Forward...PFC ACTION ALERT...Please forward



US Congressional hearings are being held this week into private contractors in Iraq. The hearings were announced after audits conducted by the special inspector general uncovered billions of dollars in Iraq reconstruction funds that have been misspent or are simply unaccounted for. Concerns about the use of private security companies in Iraq have flourished in recent years. One private security contractor in particular, warrants intense scrutiny. Please contact your local Representatives and ask the following questions about the award of a $293 million contract to Aegis Defense Services as well as questions about the use of private security contractors in general.

Contact the US Congressional Committee on Oversight and Government Reform and ask the Committee to consider the TEN Questions outlined below in relation to Aegis and ex British Army LT Col Tim Spicer

U.S. House of Representatives
2157 Rayburn House Office Building
Washington, D.C. 20515
Tel (202) 225-5051

fax to 202-225-4784.
send the email through http://oversight.house.gov/contact.asp



10 Questions about the Aegis contract.



1. How was a company with no prior experience in Iraq awarded a $293 million dollar contract? Why was the contract renewed after receiving poor performance ratings from the GAO?
2. Has former British Army General James Ellery's involvement in the award of the Aegis contract been investigated? At the time the contract was awarded he was a senior advisor to the Provisional Coalition Authority (CPA). Soon after the contract was awarded Mr. Ellery left this post and took up a position with Aegis managing the RSSS contract in Iraq. Mr. Ellery currently serves on the board of directors of Aegis.
3. What information about the background of Aegis CEO Tim Spicer was evaluated when the $293 million contract was awarded?
4. At the time the contract was awarded, was the CPA aware that Spicer had justified a human rights abuse, the murder of 18 year old Peter McBride by soldiers under his command in Belfast in 1992. In justifying the murder, Spicer portrayed a version of the events in his sworn affidavit and later in his autobiography that was dismissed by the trial court as fictional.
5. Was the CPA aware that Spicer's statement in his autobiography that his soldiers should not have been convicted showed a blatant disregard for British and International law? Do the CPA and the U.S. Military consider it important for the head of a private security company conducting military operations in Iraq to be able to demonstrate that he understands under what circumstances those under his command could use lethal force ?


This email is too long to fit, so I'll send the rest in Part II.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Ulster in Iraq, Part II
Posted by: Conchobhar on Feb 15, 2007 1:47 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Here's the second part of the email from the PFC"

6. Was the CPA aware that Spicer, as the head of his previous company, Sandline International, had been investigated for Sandline's activities in Sierra Leone and in Papua New Guinea?
7. Was the CPA aware that Sandline's activities in Papua New Guinea led to Spicer's arrest and a coup against the government ?
8. Was the allegation investigated that Spicer requested and received blank end user certificates for small arms ?
9. Did the Pentagon investigation into the March 2006 Aegis shoot-to-kill "trophy video" include evidence from all of those present in the SUV from where the shootings occurred?
10. Did those who conducted the Pentagon investigation take evidence from any of those fired upon or indeed from any Iraqi civilians?

Last week US Congresswoman Marcy Kaptur made some interesting comments on the Pentagon's contract with Tim Spicer at a House Committee hearing on Friday:

"I will say this, both in closed door meetings and in public, I have yet to find a person other than the auditor, who is able to shed any light on how it was that Aegis, a foreign corporation, was given a contract where now we have the second-largest force in Iraq, larger than the Brits, headed by someone named Tim Spicer.

Who signed that contract, and what are those 20,000 people doing, many of whom are foreign mercenaries? What are they doing? Why can't I get any answers out of our Government? What is happening inside the Department of Defence? What are those people doing over there?

The last answer I got was,
"well Congresswoman, you''ll have to go over to Central Command over in Baghdad."
OK, I'll go, but why can't I get answers on that as a member of this committee? "



And we're over there to bring democracy? Yeh, right.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Worse Then the 911 Terrorists
Posted by: sofla100 on Feb 15, 2007 1:48 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Confronting the Big Lies, it should be obvious by now:

1. America no more respects human rights then the worst countries it criticizes, such as China and Syria. It will stoop to the lowest possible levels of behavior when and if such behavior suits its interests.

2. The "terrorists" of 911 are not necessarily or perhaps even not worse then the "terrorists" involved in "black" operations employed by the USA in Iraq and other countries. In fact, perhaps the Special Ops. are worse due to the "covert" nature of the activities. As for numbers killed, US covert ops easily would go up into the thousands, perhaps tens of thousands if all the "missions" were ever known.

3. America, a so-called "Christian" nation, behaves no better and perhaps worse then many a Moslem nation. America's so-called "freedom" is laregly an illusion of its corporate masters, who own virtually all the media outlets and the vast majority of the countries wealth.

4. The USA and Israel have a very unhealthy and "symbiotic" relationship. The USA uses Israel for projecting its influence into the Middle East and Israel uses the USA as a conduit for the most advanced weapons. Both countries employ illegal "covert ops." Again, no better and perhaps worse then the "terrorists" of 911, especially if you have access to and look at the "kill" numbers.

5. America's freedom and democracy is largely a sham. "Dissent" is barely tolerated in limited degrees, if confined to narrow spectrums of the internet. All major communication is owned, controlled and monitored by a few major corporations, directly linked to those in power.

These are a few of the big lies. And, that is why this story will not receive press in the American Media. Such press would challenge the myths, the illusions, the fabrications that make up the bedrock of illusion that the masses of America's population are brainwashed into. That America is somehow better or more just then others and that it is a free country.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Great stories
Posted by: LtL on Feb 15, 2007 9:50 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Where is the proof? How do I sign up for this James Bond stuff? I've been looking for the address to mail in my resume to the Illuminati, can any one help?


1LT L, US Army Taji Iraq

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Great stories Posted by: UncleBuck
» Apply to the Special Forces Posted by: LeftWright
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement