Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
100 words for 100 days: submit your 100 word essay and get published on AlterNet
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Pot Prisoners Cost Americans $1 Billion a Year

By Paul Armentano, AlterNet. Posted February 10, 2007.


The latest numbers are out: nearly 800,000 Americans were arrested on marijuana charges in 2005. When will the insanity stop?

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

More stories by Paul Armentano

Get AlterNet in
your mailbox!

 
Advertisement

American taxpayers are now spending more than a billion dollars per year to incarcerate its citizens for pot. That's according to statistics recently released by the U.S. Department of Justice's Bureau of Justice Statistics.

According to the new BJS report, "Drug Use and Dependence, State and Federal Prisoners, 2004," 12.7 percent of state inmates and 12.4 percent of federal inmates incarcerated for drug violations are serving time for marijuana offenses. Combining these percentages with separate U.S. Department of Justice statistics on the total number of state and federal drug prisoners suggests that there are now about 33,655 state inmates and 10,785 federal inmates behind bars for marijuana offenses. The report failed to include estimates on the percentage of inmates incarcerated in county and/or local jails for pot-related offenses.

Multiplying these totals by U.S. DOJ prison expenditure data reveals that taxpayers are spending more than $1 billion annually to imprison pot offenders.

The new report is noteworthy because it undermines the common claim from law enforcement officers and bureaucrats, specifically White House drug czar John Walters, that few, if any, Americans are incarcerated for marijuana-related offenses. In reality, nearly 1 out of 8 U.S. drug prisoners are locked up for pot.

Of course, several hundred thousand more Americans are arrested each year for violating marijuana laws, costing taxpayers another $8 billion dollars annually in criminal justice costs.

According to the most recent figures available from the FBI, police arrested an estimated 786,545 people on marijuana charges in 2005 -- more than twice the number of Americans arrested just 12 years ago. Among those arrested, about 88 percent -- some 696,074 Americans -- were charged with possession only. The remaining 90,471 individuals were charged with "sale/manufacture," a category that includes all cultivation offenses, even those where the marijuana was being grown for personal or medical use.

These totals are the highest ever recorded by the FBI, and make up 42.6 percent of all drug arrests in the United States. Nevertheless, self-reported pot use by adults, as well as the ready availability of marijuana on the black market, remains virtually unchanged.

Marijuana isn't a harmless substance, and those who argue for a change in the drug's legal status do not claim it to be. However, pot's relative risks to the user and society are arguably fewer than those of alcohol and tobacco, and they do not warrant the expenses associated with targeting, arresting and prosecuting hundreds of thousands of Americans every year.

According to federal statistics, about 94 million Americans -- that's 40 percent of the U.S. population age 12 or older -- self-identify as having used cannabis at some point in their lives, and relatively few acknowledge having suffered significant deleterious health effects due to their use. America's public policies should reflect this reality, not deny it. It makes no sense to continue to treat nearly half of all Americans as criminals.

This article originally appeared in the Washington Examiner.

Digg!

See more stories tagged with: marijuana, justice system, injustice, pot arrests

Paul Armentano is the senior policy analyst for the NORML Foundation in Washington, DC. (norml.org, 888-67-NORML).

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
How to justify the cost of the war on drugs
Posted by: iweisberg on Feb 10, 2007 3:38 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It makes a lot of sense to bust pot if you are lying to the American public about what the 'War on Drugs'" either costs or accomplishes. The government acts like it is fighting against hard drugs, like herioine or alcohol, while it wastes the taxpayers' money on pot busts. This is just another scare tactic, like WMD. The money they are wasting on incarceration, which is known to be ineffective, could easily fund programs which are known to be effective. But like a dysfunctional abusive parent, it has no limit for what it will spend on punishment, while cost-effective rehab goes begging for funds. As long as incarceration is America's shameful number one growth industry, those whose interests pay off our fraudulent electoral system will continue its war on the American people, the real war they fund.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

arrest an incarceration are big business
Posted by: edsmith on Feb 10, 2007 5:11 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Think about the money that is generated form most of the arrests. There is cash and property confiscated by the police. The cash and property confiscated is kept and autioned off with the proceeds going back to the police department budgets. Attorneys fees, court costs, fines, probation and the monthly payments that go along with it.Then prison, which evyone knoews is a corporate enterprise that if making huge profits for investors. There's probably more.
Welcome to the Police State.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: arrest an incarceration are big business Posted by: karma_ran_over_dogma
a solution to this madness
Posted by: richholland on Feb 10, 2007 5:13 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
in Holland we have legalized "coffeeshops"" to sell marihuana,
if the shopkeeper sells alcohol or cocaine or sells to minors the police closes the shop.
In your house or garden you may have 4 plants.
The strange thing is that the number of users before and after the legalization stays constant, only the number of drugaddicts diminised.
In our society we consider the marihuana not as innocent but on the same level as tobacco.
I fear the present american political leaders use their policy to betray and surpress the population and in all Europe there is no admiration for this fascistoide behaviour

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: a solution to this madness Posted by: rambleman
The Ugly Truth About Marijuana
Posted by: Tom Degan on Feb 10, 2007 5:29 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
By the time you reacj my age (I'm 48) you've known personally at least a hundred people in your life who have died as a result of ciggies and booze. Not only have I never known anyone to die as a result of too much pot, I'm not even aware of it happening in all recorded human history!

Last year, on the Imus In The Morning radio program, David Crosby bought up what I thought was a very viable point: As best as I can remember it he said, "Every culture in the history of the human race has come up with some means of getting high. Of the hundreds of substances cooked up by man, marijuana is the least harmful".

Why are we still, in 2008, throwing people in prison for smoking a weed that is harmful to no one??? It just boggles the mind!

Lenny Bruce once predicted that marijuana would one day be legal because "every law student I know smokes pot. They'll eventually become senator and will legalize ot to protect themselves" Sadly, that never happened. Maybe George Carlin was more on target:

"The reason it's still illegal is because all you potheads keep forgetting where you put the petitions".

Pray for peace.

Tom Degan
Goshen, NY
"The Rant" by Tom Degan

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: The Ugly Truth About Marijuana Posted by: peacefullaim
» RE: The Ugly Truth About Marijuana Posted by: templepriest
» RE: The Ugly Truth About Marijuana Posted by: gltirebiter
Drugs don't make seeds -- An Inconvenient Solution
Posted by: P.E.A.C.E. on Feb 10, 2007 6:24 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Ending Cannabis prohibition is the most proximate and fundamental challenge facing our world. Nothing mankind is doing compares in effectiveness for rebalancing the Earth's environment, global economics, and human social evolution. Discarding counter-productive statutes that impose essential resource scarcity would end the black market, realize a truly free market, quickly shifting values from chemicals to organic agriculture.

A critically determinate agricultural resource, Cannabis is mankind's best bet for avoiding synergistic collapse of complex, integrated systems, based on immutable laws, relevant to Earth's ecosystem. We call this the Natural Order, but as a species, we consistently disrespect its laws.

If we did, we would not drain the petroleum from under our feet, nor produce radioactive waste, when we could be farming our energy, improving the soil, and securing the world's most nutritious seed. Cannabis is the only common seed with three essential fatty acids in proper proportion for long-term consumption. It's also the world's best available source of organic vegetable protein.

The greatest harms of prohibition have to do with the global food insecurity, malnutrition, and illness that are resulting from seventy years of imposed Cannabis scarcity. Until the true value of Cannabis is recognized, respected, appreciated, and celebrated, our species will not have a snowball's chance in hell of achieving sustainability on this planet.

Time is the limiting factor in the equation of survival. I invite meaningful alliance from anyone who is serious about healing these imposed imbalances in the shortest amount of time.

for peace,

Paul J. von Hartmann
ecologist, photojournalist, biodynamic agriculturist, Cannabis scholar and minister
Project P.E.A.C.E.
Planet Ecology Advancing Conscious Economics
http://www.webspawner.com/users/projectpeace
http://fundamentalcoot.blogspot.com/

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The petrochemical / pharmaceutical war on humanity continues...
Posted by: thoughtcriminal on Feb 10, 2007 7:50 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We have to go back and look at the history of Prohibition in all its forms to understand the current stituation. The rise of Standard Oil and other industrial concerns at the turn of the 20th century led to many things - including a prohibitive and controlling cultural norm that was best described by George Orwell - the power would rest in the hands of the few, and whether they were the captains of industry on Wall Street or the chairmen of the Central Soviet Committee made little difference to those who lived under their thumb.

Consider for a second that here in the US, the 'beacon of liberty', we have a greater percentage of our population in prison than anywhere else on earth - and that's largely due to the "War on Drugs" initiated by Nixon and carried ot by Reagan and Bush. It has helped spawn the surveillance society - the Drug Enforcement Agency and state and local police operate massive undercover programs in which they are free to spy on people, infiltrate people's lives, and monitor every aspect of a person's financial life - and all they have to do is state that they suspect that 'drugs are involved' to be allowed to do this. The political abuses are legion.

The explanation given is 'to keep the people safe from drugs' but at the VERY SAME TIME, the pharmaceutical industry provides more drugs to people than you can imagine - the pilots who killed the British convoy in Iraq were on amphetamines, according to one news report: Old technology, poor training and drug use raise concerns February 7, 2007

Children and adults are fed amphetamines as well, under the guise of ADHD treatment (Ritalin, Adderall), and then there are all the pain pills, from morphine to oxycontin. Meanwhile, the the war in Afghanistan has led to a new flood of Afghani heroin into California. Who is behind that? Where is our new Gary Webb?

Then you have the legal drugs - alcohol and tobacco - which kill thousands every year from cancer, heart, lung and liver diseases - all perfectly legal.

Personally, I find that smoking pot slows my mental functions down and I generally avoid it (coffee, on the other hand, is a vice I seem unable to set aside - oh well...), but no more than I avoid alcohol - special occasions only. The fact that people are locked up for something so innocuous, while the pharma business goes around unmolested pushing meth on children, is one of the most ridiculous and insane situations that exists in US society.

Of course, what really freaks the power structure out is the use of pyschoactive hallucinogens - certainly not recreational drugs, but effective at de-brainwashing the subject... they recognized this of course, and even wrote a little book on it: "LSD: Some Un-Psychedelic Implications" - a product of the CIA interrogation program...related to the Frank Olsen story - an Army biowarfare scientist who was slipped LSD in 1953 by Sidney Gottlieb and suddenly realized he had picked a very bad career path...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» George Tirebiter Posted by: UncleBuck
Pot and Jail
Posted by: Phosphorescent on Feb 10, 2007 8:06 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
In 2004 a house I was renting a room in was raided by the police. The search warrant claimed they were looking for pot. My roommate was being accused of selling and because I lived there too I was also on the warrant. A search of the entire house turned up less than 3/4 of an ouce and several pipes.

I took almost 2 years for all the court proceedings to finish up with me having earned a $700 fine for possession of THC (seeds) and paraphanelia (a pipe). My (ex)roommate is still going through his court hearings and will most likely be spending 6mo - 1 year in prison.

I had decided that while I was 'guilty' of possession of a pipe and seeds (a small amount of actual pot too, but the police left that sitting on my desk ?), that I had done nothing wrong. So I refuse to pay the state anything.

I had offered to serve jail time myself, but the clerk of courts informed me that in 02, WI passed a law forcing 'offenders' to pay the $$ amount or go to jail for contempt of court. And still owe the $$ amount. I was told the contempt of court charge would be for not paying the fine amount as ordered.

And to add insult to injury, there is also a mandatory 6 mo. suspension of drivers license.

Having lost my drivers license, I lost my job. I worked in town but when the company I worked found out I didnt have my DL, I was fired and left looking for another job. I was finally able to find another job when I had gotten my DL back but then my DL was suspended again 3 months later for having an outstanding fine.

Needless to say, I dont live in WI anymore. Yet the tolerance elsewhere in america isnt much better.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Pot and Jail Posted by: WhatNow?
» RE: Pot and Jail Posted by: Lauren
Marijuana decreases...
Posted by: waves999 on Feb 10, 2007 9:03 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Marijuana decreases the intelligence of those opposed to its use.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Alcohol, cigarettes, and prescription meds are far more dangerous than pot!
Posted by: veggiegrrrl on Feb 10, 2007 9:18 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Alcohol, cigarettes, and prescription meds are far more dangerous than pot!

Legalize pot. Tax it like other consumable goods but use all the pot tax to fund education and health care.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Contact high? Posted by: karma_ran_over_dogma
» RE: Contact high? Posted by: veggiegrrrl
» RE: Contact high? Posted by: karma_ran_over_dogma
At that rate...
Posted by: leafsong1 on Feb 10, 2007 10:11 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...with the money we've spent on Iraq we could have arrested every man woman and child in the US for marijuana posession TWICE.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: At that rate... Posted by: Grampop
juvenile justice system
Posted by: veggiegrrrl on Feb 10, 2007 11:30 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
i can only imagine a vast majority of resources within the juvenile justice system goes towards incarcerating kids for smoking pot. teens shouldn't be smoking weed but teens DO smoke weed. shame that more $ is spent on incarceration than education.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: juvenile justice system Posted by: grailsnail
Wipe That Smile Off Your Face....They don"t LIKE IT!!!!
Posted by: picket on Feb 10, 2007 12:10 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The Drug Enforcers that have come of age those of the DARE Generation, those guys that nobody liked anyway in high school, now control the lives of Physicians and other people trying to eliminate pain for really sick people.

Like Nixon said..... .....we drink to relax....THEY smoke to get high. Forgot the exact quote.

I read today an article on MAP Drug News... Cannabis is the #2 CROP in New York State after #1 HAY. Where is it all going?? Too bad Gram and Gramp can't relax with a little spliff and watch David Letterman!!!!

Those that control our lives are a JOKE.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Gary J Minter
Posted by: garyjminter on Feb 10, 2007 12:14 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Marijuana should have been legalized long ago...or, more correctly, it should have never been criminalized...The government should not have the power to deprive people of "life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness"...

Government is made up of people, and people don't have the right to mind other people's business, or to tell them how they should pursue happiness, or live their lives. What is good for one person may be bad for another, but that choice is up to each of us, not up to busybodies trying to manage our lives!

Marijuana is less dangerous and causes fewer problems than alcohol, so why shouldn't it be treated like alcohol? Adults should have the choice to smoke if they wish!

Gary

Gary J. Minter
http://aidsvillagechina.blog.sohu.com
www.healthchina.org

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Adults in a free society should be allowed to self-destruct...
Posted by: ABetterFuture on Feb 10, 2007 12:46 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...in whatever manner they see fit. I will fully support ending any and all "wars on drugs" with two conditions:

1) Harsh penalties (up to and including execution in extreme instances) for adults who sell illicit drugs to minor children.

2) No public assistance going to support someone's habit. I likewise promise never to ask you to pay for my once-in-while double whiskey, straight up with ice--MY chosen method of self-destruction.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Understanding the system
Posted by: miggy on Feb 10, 2007 1:21 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Drug enforcement makes more revenue that what it spends into enforcement or it just wouldnt work. The money you pay in taxes has nothing to do with it and never goes there,, it pays for itself... The purpose is jobs for police personnel and profit for government treasuries.

Its not my opinion, its historical fact.

Drug enforcement is a very lucrative business

After Jimmy Carter decriminalized maryjane in the 70s, the tens of thousands of out of work "DRUG ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS" simply lobbied to have it criminalized again so they could get their jobs back. Republicans promised and provided a drug war for them and wa la.

The question really is, '"is it ethical to allow the police to prey on the public at large for profit and job security"?

Wouldnt this suggest that the POLICE are operating as a for profit corporation?

If taxes were really paying for this "SYSTEM" wouldnt we have more control over whats going on?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Big tobacco & Big Cotton are the enemy of Hemp
Posted by: edsmith on Feb 10, 2007 1:49 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Let's face it, if weed was made legal and modified to stimulate high in varying degrees similar the ways we dole out booze to oursleves not only will Tobacco lose revnue but so would Big Booze. Plus, hemp would steamrole over cotton as the fabric of choice. Hemp can even become a viable fuel alternative to to the gashole producers Exxon-Mobil.
What a fucked up path our nation is on.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

With a little help from my friend.
Posted by: outsideagitator on Feb 10, 2007 1:49 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I am 68 years old and have been getting high with weed off and on for over 44 years. I started getting high when I was in an infantry outfit stationed near the Imjin river in South Korea. Most every body drank copious amounts of booze AND got high quite regularly. It was the booze that screwed people up. Some would start off getting high and then ruin a good thing by getting drunk on beer, macolay (cheap Korean beer made of rice which left you with a terrible hangover) saki or various whiskeys and wines. When I finally left the military, after a 14 month tour in Vietnam in 65-66 I left the military for good and tried my hand at being a civilian.

To make a long story short, I stayed out of the military for good, became a social justice activist and peace promoter (not a pacifist) and though poor and could very easily end up homeless if the rent and cost of living goes up much higher, I am not sorry for the choices I made. I like "peace people"'
and living with and organizing with working class folks in working class neighborhoods as well as family farmers and ranchers and Mexican farmworkers. Every where I went the
"good folks" liked to get high. Some a lot and some like myself only occasionally (like maybe 2 or three times a month) but it was other substances that folks used along with the "good herb" that caused the problems...mainly booze but certainly speed, crystal meth and wierd concotions some folks thought were acid or some other "psychadelic". If one watches out for wierd drugs and "mind alterers" you can get by I find...with a little help from your friend.

If we legalized the herb and allowed anyone to grow it for their own personal use (and to share) than I truly believe this would be a whole lot better country than it is now.

Jose

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Jesus and pot
Posted by: Dr T on Feb 10, 2007 2:50 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Would God put an evil plant on the planet?

Imagine Jesus came back for a second coming, walked among us and saw people in pain smoking a joint. Ask yourself: What would Jesus do? Call a cop? Throw the users in jail?

Since Jesus allegedly hung around with beggers, prostitutes and thieves, my hunch is he'd toke up with them.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Jesus and pot Posted by: blitzmesser
» RE: Jesus and pot Posted by: ZPaul
» RE: Jesus and pot Posted by: nikolai
» RE: Jesus and pot Posted by: Lauren
Money well-spent (if you're Budweiser or Phillip Morris)
Posted by: dgpdx on Feb 10, 2007 3:24 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Those billions aren't wasted, they help protect the profits of the alcohol and tobacco industries. Someone zoned-out (perhaps "zoned-in" is better) on pot doesn't need to spend money on beer or cigarettes. Then there are all those taxes collected on alcohol and tobacco sales to consider. Sheesh, a billion seems downright cheap. If we start letting people enjoy themselves without maximizing profits and taxes, that's like, uh, like a democracy or something.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Cocaine? What about folks who like other substances then pot?
Posted by: albrechtkrausse on Feb 10, 2007 4:14 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Far more people are in jail from cocaine and heroine than marihauana, suspiciously if your form of cocaine is "crack" you will do far more time than a person who has/sells powder cocaine. And why are these drugs illegal anyway? To protect those precious minorities from themselves? To protect our teenagers who don't have the sense to figure out 'when to say when'? To protect those dastardly poor people who can't be trusted (after all their poorness shows their moral bankruptcy)? Legalise them all. Eliminate 'street' dealers as you have eliminated Appalachian bootleggers, rum runners, Irish bootleggers, etc.....and legalise them all. Even better if people could develope a 'new drug' that would mimic the effects of the illegal ones but not have hang-overs, addictions, etc. In the immortal words of Huey Lewis- We Need A New Drug.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

American Morals....hahaha
Posted by: blitzmesser on Feb 10, 2007 5:07 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Americans can go to war, kill tousands of people with the blessings of the idiot in the white house, and do nothing about it. But when peaceful people use Mary Jane, they get arrested and put in jail like murderers.
What irony. I have heard of no one who has killed others because of using it. (But then again, that is the very reason for it being outlawed... people won't make willing soldiers when using it.)
MaryJane is very effective baked in brownies.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

????
Posted by: gellero on Feb 10, 2007 5:13 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Dunno about people not making good soldiers smokn' weed. I was in Afghanistan in the 70's, and their population was always stoned on hash. One of those things that doesn't hit the mass media.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Anti-pot position a marker of fascist politicians
Posted by: Alan8 on Feb 10, 2007 6:56 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Politicians who are anti-pot are usually evil in other related ways. They usually have pro-corporate positions; pot is a threat to the profits of the alcohol, tobacco, textile, and pharmaceutical corporations. Anti-pot politicians generally have an allegiance to the corporate power structure, and receive most of their funding from corporate sources.

The corrupt alliance of government and corporations is one of the defining characteristics of fascism. An anti-pot position is a reliable marker for fascist politicians.

Anti-pot politicians also show an indifference to the senseless suffering the so-called war on drugs has caused. Such people will generally show a similar indifference to other suffering.

A stated anti-pot position by a politician instantly marks them as someone to avoid voting for.

The Green Party (www.gp.org) has long advocated marijuana legalization.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

CONFISCATION - NOT - ENCARCERATION
Posted by: elroy Jetson on Feb 10, 2007 11:33 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
A government for the people and by the people can determine through rule of law what is acceptable for its populace. hence, cocaine was removed from coca cola at the turn of the century. Therefore, an enlightened country would demand of its government that if a substance is not allowed, it can only be confiscated, but that is all. Nothing more. It can be taken, but we should all demand the our citizens are not arrested, having their freedom, lives, property confiscated to feed police forces to arrest more cannibis users. Certainly the police are having no luck with gangs dealing cocaine and heroine, or maybe its just easier to not endanger themselves and that is why they focus on the easy marks. Explotative to be sure under the guise of "serving and protecting"
Puleeze...none of us buy that crap anylonger. with police swat teams looking more like they should be entering baghdad than our local malls, perhaps their confiscation of property and the police auctions have created this police state. It certainly isn't anything we've voted for.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Government dependence
Posted by: EricB on Feb 11, 2007 12:52 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Be interesting to know just how much keeping pot illegal keeps people employed in legal, law enforcement and prison system. Seems alot of people would be out of work if pot was legalized. Maybe they could find employment in one of the many industries that could be created by U>S> farmers being allowed to grow the non-euphoric cousin to pot. It's a crime that the special interests have such a stranglehold on the economic potential of this wondrous plant, not to mention the economics of legalizing and taxing her psychoactive cousin.
None of the arguements for keeping pot illegal I've ever heard hold enough water to be considered anything other than bad science, propaganda. Downright hogwash!!! Where is the truth in the facts that are waved about.
It is long past time for the people of this country to take a hard cold look at the facts, and decide for them selves in a national referendum, honestly counted.
What exactly is the problem here....we have the truth to set the plant free, and unleash a wealth of green technology,sutainable agriculture,and a mildly euphoric, easily taxable luxury item that is in high demand here and world wide. We need to take action as a nation if you believe it is wrong to keep the plant an outlaw...write your reprresentatives. What about a national referendum? Let the people decide, after they know all the facts. This could make a huge difference in the future of this country and the world.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Government dependence Posted by: Lauren
Pot enforcement is a political control mechanism
Posted by: jules_siegel on Feb 11, 2007 4:06 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]

Once-Secret "Nixon Tapes" Show Why the U.S. Outlawed Pot


By Kevin Zeese, AlterNet. Posted March 21, 2002.

[Excerpt]

Nixon's private comments about marijuana showed he was the epitome of misinformation and prejudice. He believed marijuana led to hard drugs, despite the evidence to the contrary. He saw marijuana as tied to "radical demonstrators." He believed that "the Jews," especially "Jewish psychiatrists" were behind advocacy for legalization, asking advisor Bob Haldeman, "What the Christ is the matter with the Jews, Bob?" He made a bizarre distinction between marijuana and alcohol, saying people use marijuana "to get high" while "a person drinks to have fun."

He also saw marijuana as part of the culture war that was destroying the United States, and claimed that Communists were using it as a weapon.

"Homosexuality, dope, immorality in general," Nixon fumed. "These are the enemies of strong societies. That's why the Communists and the left-wingers are pushing the stuff, they're trying to destroy us." His approach to drug education was just as simplistic: "Enforce the law. You've got to scare them."

Unfortunately, Nixon did more than just "scare them," whoever they were. His marijuana war rhetoric led to a dramatic increase in arrests. One year after his "all out war" comments, marijuana arrests jumped to 420,700 a year -- a full 128,000 more than the year before. Since then, nearly 15 million people have been arrested for marijuana offenses.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Hemp Coverups Uncovered
Posted by: maxpayne on Feb 11, 2007 7:56 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The building of early American colonies as well as the American Revolution would not have been possible if it were not for a very special plant.

The Cannabis / Hemp plant was used throughout the world since the beginning of time for just about everything that mankind needed. Paper made from hemp was used for books, bibles, maps, and money. You can produce 4 times as much paper from an acre of hemp as you can from an acre of trees at 1/4 the cost, 1/5 the pollution, it is 10 times stronger and lasts up to 1000 years instead of only 50. And it can be recycled 4 times as many times as paper from wood pulp.

The Constitution was printed on hemp paper as well as the first 3 drafts of the Declaration of Independence. Even great sailing ships like the U.S.S. Constitution were made primarily out of hemp.

Hemp is the STRONGEST natural fiber on the planet. Hemp is 26 times stronger than cotton and 10 times longer lasting. The first Levi jeans were made out of hemp as well as all of the soldier's clothes for the Revolutionary War. It requires no chemicals to grow, has very few natural enemies, and grows in the widest variety of climates of any weed or plant. It is also the FASTEST GROWING plant on the planet, growing 4 times faster than corn. The seeds from the hemp plant provide the highest source of complete vegetable protein of any food source on earth. Even higher than soybeans. It has also been re-realized lately that the hemp seed is the highest source of Essential Fatty Acids in the world. ESSENTIAL, meaning :NECESSARY FOR LIFE, Fatty Acids are necessary for us and beneficial for cleaning the cholesterol out of the arteries naturally. All oils in the supermarket are bad since they are placed in clear plastic containers and exposed to direct sunlight. They become as bad as saturated fats, and end up CAUSING cholesterol buildup, leading to heart attacks, etc. Hemp seed oil can even be used as a machine-grade lubricant for engines and other machines replacing petroleum oil from the ground.

Henry Ford built his Ford Model-T using hemp to line the side panels. The impact strength was 10 times stronger than steel alone. This would eliminate many vehicular deaths today. The Model-T was also designed to run on hemp fuel which Henry Ford grew. This was displayed in Popular Mechanics in Feb. of 1938. Concentrated extracts of Cannabis from the flowers were the 2nd most used medicines in America for 150 years for over 100 separate medical illnesses. It is probably the best natural medicine for Glaucoma, stress, and controlling nausea, and works very well for arthritis , asthma, and epilepsy. It is estimated that Hemp would have at least 50,000 commercial uses if it were legal in America today.

The reason that Hemp is illegal in America today is because the main families in America (Masons), the Harrimans and Rockefellers (Standard Oil), the Whitneys (Eli Whitney-Cotton Gin), Dupont (Chemicals in wood pulp processing and cotton pesticides), and Hearst (Newspapers, Media) find it more profitable to sell us unnecessary chemicals, unneeded dug-up petroleum oil, immune system destroying pharmaceuticals, and axed up trees cut into real thin slices, all at over-inflated prices and at the expense of our health and living environment. For these companies, the real problem is that one cannot patent a natural plant. Almost everything produced in America by large corporations is exported for sale on the world markets. The total value of oil, petrochemicals, and pharmaceutical sales totals hundreds of billions of dollars. However, with the