Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

The Man Who Might Make Obama President

By Christopher Hayes, The Nation. Posted February 5, 2007.


David Axelrod, Barack Obama's closest political adviser, is applying the lessons he learned from Chicago's ugly racialized politics.
Advertisement

Given his rhetorical skills, Harvard Law pedigree, up-by-the-bootstraps bio and, well, his race, it is hard not to compare recently elected Massachusetts Governor Deval Patrick to his friend Barack Obama. Both men entered crowded primaries in which they were definitively not favored. They both inspired a kind of personal pride among supporters that is rare in politics. On the evening of Obama's convincing primary victory, the crowd and the candidate joined in chanting, "Yes We Can!" and if you listen closely to video of Patrick rallies, you'll hear the crowd chanting the very same thing. When Patrick looked into the camera in one ad and said the state's problem wasn't a "deficit of dollars but a deficit of leadership," it was hard not to hear echoes of Obama's oft-used line that the country's biggest problem isn't a budget deficit but an "empathy deficit." And in Patrick's most effective ad, he stands on a stage delivering an impassioned speech to a crescendo of applause as Obama sits on a stool just behind him, nodding approvingly, his head perfectly framed in the shot.

Which brings us to something else the two men share: David Axelrod, the 51-year-old reporter turned media consultant who was the key media strategist for both men's campaigns. He's the one who wrote those ads, framed that shot and came up with the "Yes We Can" tag line. "I don't bring these messages to candidates," Axelrod says when I point out the similarities. "I look for candidates who exemplify and reflect those messages." In the cases of Obama and Patrick, he says, the work is a collaboration. "They take and improve on what you bring them; they deliver it well because they believe in it. It's like riffing with great musicians."

Even though he lives 1,000 miles from the notoriously clubby world of political consulting, Axelrod has become one of its most successful and respected practitioners. Mark McKinnon, who produced George W. Bush's ads in the last cycle and now works for John McCain, calls Axelrod "the best media guy out there who doesn't have a ring." With his quick wit and knack for soundbites ("The Icon gets hoisted," Axelrod said of the media's treatment of star candidates, "and then it becomes a piƱata"), the onetime ChicagoTribune political writer is a favorite of reporters seeking quotes. Charming as he can be with journalists, those who have worked with him say, he can be "aggressive" and "extremely difficult" in the trenches of a campaign. Colleagues point out that he's uncommonly idealistic for someone in his line of work, though a veteran Chicago reporter noted that this has its limits: "He's a principled guy, but he's not a philanthropist. The candidates he's worked for have been well funded, and he's made very good money doing what he does."

Axelrod is known for becoming close to his candidates, and indeed, he has become Obama's closest political adviser, talking strategy daily and producing the two videos recently posted to Obama's website. Reclining in a chair in his Chicago office the week before Obama announced the formation of his presidential exploratory committee, Axelrod was subdued, seemingly exhausted, but intense and hyperarticulate. Like Obama he speaks with what can seem a refreshing frankness, though just a few hours later, going over my notes, it was clear that he had remained scrupulously on message.

Axelrod's firm, AKP Media, which he runs with his partners John Kupper and David Plouffe, has handled a series of high-profile national and state campaigns, from John Edwards's 2004 presidential run to Tom Vilsack's and Eliot Spitzer's gubernatorial races; but for much of its two decades the firm's bread and butter has been mayoral races, with a particularly strong track record in electing black candidates. Indeed, ever since working on the re-election campaign of Chicago's Harold Washington in 1987, Axelrod has developed something of a novel niche for a political consultant: helping black politicians convince white voters to support them. With Obama's bid for the presidency, Axelrod's skill in this area will face the ultimate test.

Born on New York's Lower East Side, Axelrod grew up in a middle-class Jewish household and showed a passion for politics early: At age 10 he was shuffling around his housing complex with a cardboard box filled with John Lindsay-for-mayor literature. He enrolled at the University of Chicago in 1972, lured by Chicago's storied politics, and resolved to become a "newspaperman." Upon graduating he was hired by the Tribune, and having just lost his father to suicide, he turned to the paper as a surrogate family. "I was a young kid," he says, "just making my way in the world, and the Tribune adopted me."

Axelrod was something of a journalistic prodigy, rising to become city hall bureau chief and political columnist at the ripe old age of 27. Then in 1984, he left it behind to join the campaign of Paul Simon, the bow-tied intellectual mounting an improbable run for US Senate. Though he joined the campaign as communications director, within weeks Axelrod was promoted to co-campaign manager. "We were too dumb to quit," says David Wilhelm, who co-piloted the campaign and would go on to become DNC head in Clinton's first year in office. "It helped that we were so idealistic. One of the things about David Axelrod -- I have certainly talked to clients about this -- one of the reasons he's so successful is that he is a believer. At the end of the day, he's an idealist. He actually cares about his candidates and their positions on issues. While he can be caustic, he is not a cynic."


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: david axelrod, barack obama, election08

Christopher Hayes is a contributing editor of In These Times and the Chicago editor of Just Cause magazine.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Truth:
Posted by: bassman on Feb 5, 2007 1:03 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This man scares the crap out of the Republican party. He not only can win, but will...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Truth: Posted by: gazooks
advice for the advisor
Posted by: edith on Feb 5, 2007 2:41 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
axelrad might want to advise his client that the budget deficit does matter, that it is not just a piece of persuasive rhetoric to be balanced off Obama's tongue with a deficit of hope, or whatever BS concoction Obama or Edwards stretch into a bad metaphor. The deficit and national debt are real, and taxes will go up and federal operating programs in education, medicaid and foreign aid will go down as a result of Bush's budget wreckage. Obama didn't cause the deficit but he'd better be ready with Axelrad's help to be specific as to how he will prevent all of us from being swallowed up by it.

Significant cuts in defense are one way to reduce the deficit along with tax hikes, but Obama and Axelrad best be ready to tell hundreds of thousands of primarily white suburbanites that their defense contractor, DOD, NSA and consulting jobs no longer exist and the payments on the BMW or Chevy Suburban are in default. DOD is the WPA of the 21st century. Can Obama stand the heat? Will he want to ?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: advice for the advisor Posted by: ChicagoPaul
» RE: advice for the advisor Posted by: bassman
On the other hand...
Posted by: Dboy on Feb 5, 2007 3:43 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
He could be the man who makes John McCain president.

Dboy

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: On the other hand... Posted by: gazooks
» RE: On the other hand... Posted by: LizOnlineInGa
Faith-based candidacy
Posted by: MartianBachelor on Feb 5, 2007 5:03 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
> If the Obama message can be distilled to a single word, it is "hope."

"Hope Dies Last" (Keeping the Faith in Difficult Times) was the title of a recent book by Studs Terkel...

Hope - the feeling that what is wanted can be had; a person or thing in which expectations are centered; one of the three Christian virtues (Hope is dependent upon Faith). Syn: dream.

This is starting to sound more and more like another rerun. How long can it be before we get an "I have a hope..." speech?

Far be it from me to suggest how someone should run their campaign, but couldn't we use a few good ideas for a change rather that a boatload more feelings of sweetness and light?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Faith-based candidacy Posted by: gjames
» RE: Faith-based candidacy Posted by: gazooks
» RE: Faith-based candidacy Posted by: Wacre
I don't like Obama, but...
Posted by: edsmith on Feb 5, 2007 6:11 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If it's between Osama, I mean Obama, and that human weathervane darling of the elitist corparate world, suported by corporations and tied at the hip the the Bushes, Hillary Clinton, I'll work for Obama - big time.
One thing going good for Democrats for a change is that Billary has that loser working for her, raising money, managing her campaign, the guy with the greasy palms and big smile, Terry MColough (or whatever way his name is spelled. who care? He's such a loser). Hopefully he lose for Billary too.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

NO VOTE FOR OBAMA HERE
Posted by: bbfmail on Feb 5, 2007 6:36 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I will never support anyone who's Iraq plan is to leave American soldiers in that awful situation until March 2008. Does he have a son or daughter over in Iraq? I don't think so.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: NO VOTE FOR OBAMA HERE Posted by: CriminallySane
» RE: NO VOTE FOR OBAMA HERE Posted by: bassman
» RE: NO VOTE FOR OBAMA HERE Posted by: Gerald
He needs to distance himself from radical Shi'ite Islam.
Posted by: albrechtkrausse on Feb 5, 2007 6:41 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
He needs to just come out and apologise and clearly state that despite his name he is not in favour of radical islam. Otherwise his given name, Hussein, will be the albatross around his neck and he will not be elected (except maybe by Iranian ex-pats and emigres.) Everyone knows who Hussein is and being named in honour of the infamous martyr killed in the Battle of Karbala, and founder of militant Shi'ite Islam, Hussein will not be a 'plus' in American politics.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Tired of rascists Posted by: albrechtkrausse
» RE: Tired of rascists Posted by: babs
» RE: Tired of rascists Posted by: albrechtkrausse
» RE: Tired of rascists Posted by: Wacre
» RE: Tired of rascists Posted by: DCostello2
Deluded Dems
Posted by: wmoss2 on Feb 5, 2007 6:48 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Democrats have an opportunity to retake the white house in 08. However, if Obama wins the primary this will have been a wasted opportunity. I am sorry to say this, but the man's race pretty much destroys his chances of winning the election. A black man will probably never win a presidential election in this country.

It's wrong to judge a person on race, rather than individual merit; yet, this is what will be done. Black people have a terrible reputation with other racial and ethnic groups. I really can't imagine Asians, Hispanics, Caucasians, etc. overcoming their antipathy towards blacks for the election. No matter how great a guy Obama may (or may not) be, most people will see his dark skin, and in the back of their minds they will imagine scenes from 'Boyz n da Hood'...sad but true.

I think a lot of liberal Democrats are pretty deluded about this. Wake up and try to get outside your liberal bubbles! 8 years of Bush should have proven to you that the rest of the country does not think like you. If you want a clue as to how the man in the street feels; quiz the Korean grocer about the black candidate and see where that leads. You might be surprised.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Deluded Dems or Bu-shit Posted by: gazooks
» RE: Deluded Dems or Bu-shit Posted by: gjames
» RE: Deluded Dems or Bu-shit Posted by: cottontail
» RE: Deluded Dems Posted by: bassman
» RE: Deluded Dems Posted by: gazooks
» "articulate"? Posted by: albrechtkrausse
Obama Illusion
Posted by: staringatthesun on Feb 5, 2007 8:51 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If you want a serious evaluation of the position taken by Obama look at this http://zmagsite.zmag.org/Feb2007/street0207.html .
He is not as progressive as his "handlers" try to make him seem. We need a change in this nation, and while it would be great to see it come from a multi-racial president Obama is not the man as he is a corporate tool.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Obama Illusion, Radical Confusion Posted by: staringatthesun
» RE: Obama Illusion, Radical Confusion Posted by: staringatthesun
Obama and Clinton are distractions
Posted by: common intelligence on Feb 5, 2007 9:40 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
They are being shoved in the public face as being the only candidates. Yet if these two are the winning Demos to run the Demos will lose to the republicans in 2008.

It is so highly planned. If anyone thinks the NEOCONS would allow a Muslim/Black become President of the United States then this national population better get their head out of their Arses, PDQ or all is lost.

And Hillary...well she's part of the CON game too. The CLintons are as wrapped up in the whole MId-East perpetuality as Bush is. Being a Female has nothing to do with it.

There are at least four other more viable candidates worth electing. Better get smart America or face Nuclear war by BUSH!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Who cares
Posted by: fifthworld on Feb 5, 2007 11:39 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I wouldn't even take Obama over Hillary -- they're both media darlings, cowards on the urgent issues, substanceless. Just shows where we are culturally-psychologically. The public's gonna be suckered into yet another Democratic delusion. If we're lucky to make it another 10 years, watch for the stubborn old bumper stickers, "Obama 2008" or whatever.

Personally I'd rather just wait for the whole thing to fall apart than see this painful propping up of the system, pretension that the whole damned thing doesn't have to give way, for everyone's sake. It's all damage control at this point anyway and we all walk around in denial. The real question is, what are the responsible things to do on a sinking ship?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Who cares Posted by: gjames
obama/ harold washington
Posted by: wleming on Feb 5, 2007 2:29 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Harold Washington was the greatest mayor in the history of Chicago. Mr. Obama=- has a tough act to follow.
warren leming

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

He Needs to Distance Himself from Israel and Apartheid
Posted by: sofla100 on Feb 5, 2007 4:40 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This is perhaps Obama's biggest challenge. AIPAC has a stranglehold over many a politician, Hillary being one it basically owns, lock, stock and barrel. The Zionists have made it pretty clear, if Obama goes so far as to suggest Isreal seek peace, he will be labeled an "anti-Semite," much as Jimmy Carter has been, and sent to the political dust-bin. As for the Zionists, Hillary will be the first choice, she is guaranteed to be gung-ho on finding a way for war with Iran, even if it cannot be pulled off under Bush . Now, it would be nice if someone like Obama could have the courage to stand up to the genocide against the Palestinian people. But, that is probably expecting way too much. It will be enough if US transport planes stop flying in to Tel Aviv the cluster bombs and napalm needed for the next Israeli action against Lebanon or Syria's civilian populations.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I really liked Mr. Obama... UNTIL...
Posted by: greentime on Feb 5, 2007 5:03 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I read that he said the baby boom generation had to "get over itself".

EXCUSE ME??? Say WHAT?????? Oh NO you didn't Mr. Obama!

First of all, the boomer generation is NOT a mono-culture.
We are very diverse - especially P-O-L-I-T-I-C-A-L-L-Y Mr. Obama.

Some of us stood up for civil rights - some didn't.
Some joined their racist fathers' organizations instead.

Some of us marched for peace - some hawked the war.
Some of us burned our draft cards to protest an immoral war - some enlisted and went and killed "others" because they were different and because you don't question when your government tells you to kill.

Thanks to some of us boomers Mr. Obama, people have bridged a lot of their differences.

Some of had our consiousness raised even further in the women's movement- and let me assure you - some didn't.

Some of us worked hard for Affirmative Action - and some worked against us every step of the way. Amazing isn't it? The same generation.

Some of us turned into the worst, greedy, vile, and thieving corporate bastards the world has ever known... and some of us remained compassionate and fair and came to work with a generous heart and our mind OPEN. Some of my generation would vote for you Mr. Obama. Mmmm, or maybe we shouldn't.

And Mr. Obama... one last thing:
Some of us truly wanted to reform a corrupt government - some didn't.

Do you know what Mr. Obama?
Some of us became Senators and you know...
even President!!! Yeah, same generation.

I will be listening to see if you can really understand upon whose shoulders YOU stand.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: I really liked Mr. Obama... UNTIL... Posted by: Fat Man at the Buffet Line
Sick of Poltical Consultants...
Posted by: CatDad on Feb 5, 2007 10:25 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Carville/Begala, Karl Rove, (the late) Lee Atwater...Are all the candidates in this nation so horrible that they have to be "re-branded." I was watching Carville on CNN today trashing Ralph Nader for thinking about running for prez again and of course he blamed Nader for Bush getting the presidency. Perhaps the real issue is the fear of a candidate who doesn't need his expensive "makeover" services.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Anyone who is curious as to the FACTS about Obama..You should
Posted by: ekipnrut on Feb 6, 2007 5:13 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
For a moment, shut your trap ...click the link and read.
PSZNet
Here is the logic of the situation:
Either the facts as represented by Street..most of which
amount to him (Street) quoting Obama...are true(accurate)
---Let's not fuck around with semantics...you'all know the
meaning----or they are false..BS..jive..a smear.
One doesn't need to take off the shoes to keep track of the
count...It is ONE (1) of the two. Period.

If the contents of the book are what they certainly appear
to be..if indeed 'fat' means 'greasy'...then Obama is simply
describing himself as a reactionary 'clown of color', a
willing sycophant tool of the PNAC/NWO Machine, i.e. a
dangerous F'n enemy of humanity and a collaborator and
enabler of war criminals who needs to be exposed and
THE FUCK FORGOTTEN.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

GRASSROOTS PHENOM
Posted by: radbear on Feb 13, 2007 11:12 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
David Yepsen, longtime Des Moines Register political writer, told NPR (Feb. 13) that, in thirty years of Iowa caucus coverage, he has never seen anything like the enthusiasm - or crowd size - generated by Senator Obama's weekend appearances in the Hawkeye State. While this must be rather discouraging for Governor Tom Vilsack, it will come as no surprise to anyone who attended the 2006 "Harkin Steakfry," where Obama delivered a (long) speech that hypnotized most of the 3,500 activists who attended. Outside the fairgrounds where Obama spoke, a lone hawker was selling Obama for President badges; they were all sold in a few minutes. I, too, have been involved with the Democratic caucuses in Iowa for three decades. The tides of enthusiasm Obama generates are like nothing I have seen before, even for sitting presidents - or their spouses. I volunteered for Harkin in New Hampshire, so I had the opportunity to see Bill Clinton's brilliant media campaign at close range. Although I didn't much like him, I came away with the feeling that he could win the general election. The feeling I get from the Obama campaign is not one of carefully staged slickness with the kind of clever theatrical trappings that helped to propelled Clinton to the White House, but a sense of simplicity and sincerity. Anyone who has read Obama's books must find it impossible to believe that Axelrod is writing his speeches. What he does seem to be doing - and doing very well - is creating the platform from which his candidate is projecting the man Obama. However, his real test as an advisor and organizer will come when we finally go beyond the intriguing backstory and Obama's early and correct criticism of the Iraq adventure and get down to questions about other major policies and programs. How will Obama and his team handle the arguments for his positions in the heat of battle? Recall that Obama's beloved Chicago Bears scored on the first kick-off and still managed to lose the game.j

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]