Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Government Lies Over Najaf 'Cult' Battle Exposed

By Dahr Jamail and Ali Al-Fadhily, IPS News. Posted February 2, 2007.


The Iraqi government lied about the killing of hundreds of Shias in an attack on Sunday aided by American forces, with the possible motive of stifling growing Shia-Sunni unity in the area of Najaf.

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

More stories by Dahr Jamail Ali Al-Fadhily

Get AlterNet in
your mailbox!

 
Advertisement

Iraqi government lies over the killing of hundreds of Shias in an attack on Sunday stand exposed by independent investigations carried out by IPS reporters in Iraq.

Conflicting reports had arisen earlier on how and why a huge battle broke out around the small village Zarqa, located just a few kilometres northeast of the Shia holy city Najaf, which is 90 km south of Baghdad.

One thing certain is that when the smoke cleared, more than 200 people lay dead after more than half a day of fighting Sunday Jan. 28. A U.S. helicopter was shot down, killing two soldiers. Twenty-five members of the Iraqi security force were also killed.

"We were going to conduct the usual ceremonies that we conduct every year when we were attacked by Iraqi soldiers," Jabbar al-Hatami, a leader of the al-Hatami Shia Arab tribe said.

"We thought it was one of the usual mistakes of the Iraqi army killing civilians, so we advanced to explain to the soldiers that they killed five of us for no reason. But we were surprised by more gunfire from the soldiers."

The confrontation took place on the Shia holiday of Ashura which commemorates Imam Hussein, grandson of the prophet Muhammad and the most revered of Shia saints. Emotions run high at this time, and self-flagellation in public is the norm.

Many southern Shia Arabs do not follow Iranian-born cleric Ayatollah Ali al-Sistani. They believe the religious leadership should be kept in the hands of Arab clerics. Al-Hatami and al-Khazaali are two major tribes that do not follow Sistani.

Tribal members from both believe the attack was launched by the central government of Baghdad to stifle growing Shia-Sunni unity in the area.

"Our convoy was close to the al-Hatami convoy on the way to Najaf when we heard the massive shooting, and so we ran to help them because our tribe and theirs are bound with a strong alliance," a 45-year-old man who asked to be referred to as Ahmed said.

Ahmed, a member of the al-Khazali tribe said "our two tribes have a strong belief that Iranians are provoking sectarian war in Iraq which is against the belief of all Muslims, and so we announced an alliance with Sunni brothers against any sectarian violence in the country. That did not make our Iranian dominated government happy."

The fighting took place on the Diwaniya-Najaf road and spread into nearby date-palm plantations after pilgrims sought refuge there.

"American helicopters participated in the slaughter," Jassim Abbas, a farmer from the area said. "They were soon there to kill those pilgrims without hesitation, but they were never there for helping Iraqis in anything they need. We just watched them getting killed group by group while trapped in those plantations."

Much of the killing was done by U.S. and British warplanes, eyewitnesses said.

Local authorities including the office of Najaf Governor Asaad Abu Khalil who is a member of the pro-Iranian Supreme Council for Islamic Revolution in Iraq (SCIRI) had claimed before the killings that a group of primarily foreign Sunni fighters with links to al-Qaeda had planned to disrupt the Ashura festival by attacking Shia pilgrims and senior ayatollahs in Najaf. The city is the principal seat of religious learning for Shias in Iraq.

Officials claimed that Iraqi security forces had obtained intelligence information from two detained men that had led the Iraqi Scorpion commando squad to prepare for an attack. The intelligence claimed obviously had little impact on how events unfolded.

Minister of Interior Jawad al-Bolani announced to reporters at 9 am Sunday morning that Najaf was being attacked by al-Qaeda. Immediately following this announcement the Ministry of National Security (MNS) announced that the dead were members of the Shia splinter extremist group Jund al-Sama (Army of Heaven) who were out to kill senior ayatollahs in Najaf, including Grand Ayatollah Ali al-Sistani.

Iraq's national security advisor Muaffaq al-Rubaii said just 15 minutes after the MNS announcement that hundreds of Arab fighters had been killed, and that many had been arrested. Rubaii claimed there were Saudis, Yemenis, Egyptians and Afghans.

But Governor Khalil's office backed away from its initial claims after the dead turned out to be local Shia Iraqis. Iraqi security officials continue to contradict their own statements. Most officials now say that the dead were Shia extremists supported by foreign powers.

The government of Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki has a pattern of announcing it is fighting terrorists, like its backers in Washington. Many Iraqis in the south now accuse Baghdad of calling them terrorists simply because they refuse to collaborate with the Iranian dominated government.

Digg!

See more stories tagged with: iraq, najaf, government lies

Dahr Jamail is an independent journalist who reports from Iraq.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
No wonder we call people thugs
Posted by: mizipi on Feb 2, 2007 6:00 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Only problem, George and his generals are looking in mirrors when they label someone a thug. Everybody is using God's name to kill their enemies. I wonder if they will use the same name when they face Satan himself?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Divide and conquer - is that in Petraeus's counterinsurgency manual?
Posted by: thoughtcriminal on Feb 2, 2007 7:04 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"Tribal members from both believe the attack was launched by the central government of Baghdad to stifle growing Shia-Sunni unity in the area."

Let's see what General Petraeus has to say about the matter: "According to Petraeus, counterinsurgency strategies must include “above all, efforts to establish a political environment that helps reduce support for the insurgents and undermines the attraction of whatever ideology they may espouse. In certain Sunni Arab regions of Iraq, establishing such a political environment is likely of greater importance than military operations, since the right political initiatives might undermine the sanctuary and assistance provided to the insurgents."

Also he says a goal is to have "Leaders in the Security Forces staying out of politics, providing courageous, competent leadership to their units, implementing policies that are fair to all members of their forces, and fostering loyalty to their Army or Police band of brothers rather than to specific tribes, ethnic groups, political parties, or local militias. Iraqi leaders are, in short, the real key to the new Iraq, and we thus need to continue to do all that we can to enable them."

Translation: For the US to succeed in turning Iraq into a colonial oil outpost in the Middle East, any internal political solidarity must be destroyed, and a security force loyal to the puppet regime (i.e. the Iraqi Parliament) must be created.

Not that Petraeus can come right out and say it - thus all the doubletalk. Look at the clever idiot's views on Vietnam.. Yup - another Rumsfeld - just smart enough to really screw things up.

The best way of getting rid of the insurgency? Hand control of the oil back to the Iraqi people and pull US troops out of the country - then the insurgents would have nothing to fight against or for, and noone would bother to join them.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Straight from 1984
Posted by: daspendlove on Feb 2, 2007 7:27 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This is so Orwellian.
Let's all submit to Big Brother! It's inevitable, right?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

OK now I'm really confused
Posted by: DaBear on Feb 2, 2007 9:13 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I thought Iran was innocent and not involved in Iraq. Or are the right-wing-nut-jobs accurate suddenly? I don't get it.

Was there a "death cult" as the MSM claims or not? Is Iran involved or not? Does Iran have the bomb or not? This is some of the most arcane writing I've ever seen from DJ.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

burn baby burn
Posted by: ShoShenQ on Feb 2, 2007 8:15 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I hope you burn in the hell you created.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Orwellian indeed.
Posted by: Taurannasaurus on Feb 3, 2007 2:04 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
One thing certain is that when the smoke cleared, more than 200 people lay dead after more than half a day of fighting Sunday Jan. 28. A U.S. helicopter was shot down, killing two soldiers. Twenty-five members of the Iraqi security force were also killed.



I started reading this but couldn't get past this part. I saw the TV news of this day, It might have been fox which i guess wouldn't be too surprising but I remembered how the anchor said "A U.S. helecopter was shot down, killing two soldiers." after reading this the part that struck me was 25 Iraqi soldiers were killed. This is sooooo wrong, It reminds me of in the South Park movie where Chef and all of the black soldiers are part of operation "Human Sheild" for all of the white soldiers.

We come to their country, start a civil war, then send our allied Iraqi forces in on the ground... Keeping the total of American troops killed as low as possible. (its media-friendly that way, so our president will look that much better... after all, we all know that any dissent "emboldens" the enemy)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]