Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Punish the Right-Wing Liars

By Matt Taibbi, RollingStone.com. Posted January 31, 2007.


If the right-wing media keeps spreading lies like the one about Barack Obama supposedly going to a madrassa as a child, it's time to consider hiring the meanest lawyers on the planet to fight these creeps.

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

Also in Top Stories

Sleeping Around Craigslist
Anna Reed, Lily Penza, East Bay Express

Bush's Secret Army of Snoops and Snitches
Matthew Rothschild, The Progressive

Michael Pollan on What's Wrong with Environmentalism
Kate Cheney Davidson, Yale Environment 360

A Peak Oil Prophet Imagines Life in America After Wal-Mart
Michelle Nijhuis, Grist.org

Sci-Fi Heroes Take on the System
Roya Rastegar, ColorLines

Billionaires Are Gouging Your Grandparents
Brave New Films, Brave New Films

Online Activists Keep the Pressure on Obama
Ari Melber, TheNation.com

More stories by Matt Taibbi

Get AlterNet in
your mailbox!

 
Advertisement

"Are the American people ready for an elected president who was educated in a madrassa as a young boy and has not been forthcoming about his Muslim heritage?" -- From Hannity.com, long after the "madrassa" story had been debunked

Nearly two years before the next presidential election, we've already set the tone: Even the most outrageous media fictions about candidates are apparently going to go unpunished.

At least that was my thought, after watching last week's unfolding of the Obama-madrassa scandal -- the unofficial starting gun for the Great Slime Race, as the 2008 presidential campaign will someday be known. I found the entire affair puzzling. I know for sure that if I made a journalistic "mistake" of that magnitude, I'd be spending the rest of my life picking strawberries in the Siberian tundra. Most print journalists I know would expect the same thing; the legal ramifications alone of intentionally going to print with a story that missed by that much would guarantee that 80 cents out of every dollar you made for the next ten years would go to the victim of your libel. That's unless you're Tom Friedman and you can use congenital idiocy as a defense in court.

For some reason, however, we never see full-blown libel suits in high-level political journalism. Moreover, there appears to be a completely different standard for talk-radio and TV talk-show hosts, who are somehow allowed to lie and fuck up with impunity, and still remain employed. I get the feeling that as a society we have decided to give a collective pass to serial media swindlers like Sean Hannity simply because we never expect them to actually document the "facts" that come spewing in mass volumes out of their zoster-covered mouths every day. We actually expect them to pull most of their material out of their asses, and are mostly content to address the problem by pompously correcting their errata post-factum in whiny media-crit outlets like...well, like this one. Actual real punishment never seems to be forthcoming.

The Obama incident was a perfect example. After Fox outlets, Insight magazine and the Roger Ailes morning vehicle Fox and Friends erroneously reported that a source in "Hillary Clinton's camp" had uncovered that Barack Obama had been schooled in a "madrassa" in his youth in Indonesia, CNN dispatched a reporter to the school in question and found that the tale was totally false, that there were religion classes only once a week at the school and that the school had not even a hint of Wahabbite influence. Moreover, Hillary Clinton's camp denied having anything to do with the story. "They made it up," Clinton spokesman Howard Wolfson said.

Fox responded with a classic "Eat me you clowns!" send-off, with Fox anchor John Gibson bitching that John Vause, the CNN reporter who blew up their report, "probably went to the very [same] madrassa." Ultimately there was a reluctant "retraction" of sorts on Fox and Friends, but if you pay careful attention, the statement read by Fox anchor Steve Doocy isn't a retraction at all. Here's what he said:

Doocy: : One other thing. We want to clarify something: On Friday of last week, we did the story from Insight magazine where we talked about how they were quoting that Barack Obama, when he was a child growing up in Indonesia, had attended a madrassa. Well, Mr. Obama's people called and they said that that is absolutely false. They said the idea that Barack Obama went to a radical Muslim school is completely ridiculous. In his book it does say that he went to a mostly Muslim school but not to a madrassa.

Obviously there is absolutely no admission of error here; they only concede that Barack Obama himself claims the story is false, which is what most people expect a politician to do even after a true expose. Doocy read his text with the tone of a junior-high bully wiseass ripping off a school-mandated "apology" in front of the class; his tone clearly indicated that he, and Fox, were greatly annoyed by the inconvenience of having to "clarify" anything for anyone.


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: sean hannity, barack obama, fox news, liars

Matt Taibbi is a writer for Rolling Stone.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
My favorite Hannity lies
Posted by: phreephallin on Jan 31, 2007 10:22 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We found WMD's in Iraq.
Valerie Plame was not a CIA covert operative.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: My favorite Hannity lies Posted by: dikaiosyne
» F'ing Hilarious Posted by: u r on crack
» RE: My favorite Hannity lies Posted by: tirebiter
blue pill please
Posted by: squintyken on Jan 31, 2007 10:41 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
" I know what you're thinking, 'cause right now I'm thinking the same thing. Actually, I've been thinking it ever since I got here. Why, oh why didn't I take the blue pill? " -cypher, Matrix
(sigh)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: blue pill please Posted by: AppleMommie AZ
» RE: blue pill please Posted by: Rolomax
What the the exact laws in these cases? Any lawyers out there?
Posted by: albrechtkrausse on Jan 31, 2007 11:49 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'm not a lawyer but I seem to recall some deal about "public figures" being allowed to be slandered or held up to ridicule? That Larry Flynnt movie comes to mind. I know that some countries (like the UK) seem to have stricter libel laws. But I'm really not sure on where the line is drawn in the USA (does it have to been so unbelieveable so that its a sure 'satire'? can it be an subtle, believeable lie? does anything go? do you need to show actual financial damages? is there a difference between 'entertainment' programs and 'news' programs?). Any lawyers out there?

ps: nobody touches on the HUSSEIN issue. I find that point interesting because it cannot be a coincident that his middle name (notice unused by him in recent times) comes from the most famous militant Shi'te martyr Hussein who was killed in the Battle of Karbala and is still celebrated today.)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» The Baa'th Party was Stalinist Posted by: lessbread
» RE: The Baa'th Party was NOT Stalinist Posted by: albrechtkrausse
» Whatever Dude Posted by: lessbread
» RE: Whatever Dude Posted by: laoma
» RE: Whatever Dude Posted by: lessbread
» "News" versus "Entertainment"? Posted by: albrechtkrausse
» Quoting other sources Posted by: albrechtkrausse
» RE: Quoting other sources Posted by: lessbread
More serious media attack:
Posted by: rwa on Jan 31, 2007 12:28 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As expected, the attack Iran hype has slipped into overdrive.

“The Pentagon is investigating whether an attack on a military compound in Karbala on January 20 was carried out by Iranians or Iranian-trained operatives, a U.S. official told CNN on Tuesday…. Some Iraqis speculate that the Iranian Revolutionary Guards Corps carried out the attack in retaliation for the capture by U.S. forces of five of its members in Irbil, Iraq, on January 11, according to a Time.com article published Tuesday.”

In other words, CNN, as a faithful propaganda handmaiden, is speculating, thus adding fuel to the attack Iran fire now smoldering, ready to break out into a five alarm conflagration, as planned, with the appropriate admixture of irresponsible speculation, as usual backed up with little more than thin air.
“Some Iraqis speculate that the IRGC has already started a campaign of revenge with the killing of five American soldiers in Karbala on Jan. 20, nine days after the arrest of the IRGC [Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps.] members in Erbil. As the logic of the rumor goes, five American soldiers were killed for five Iranians taken; [the attack at the Provincial Joint Coordination Center in] Karbala was an IRGC message to release its colleagues—or else,” writes Robert Baer for Time Magazine, basing his story on rumor and hearsay, a common enough modus operandi for corporate journalists these days...
John Negroponte, “told the Senate Foreign Relations Committee that an emboldened Iran presented new difficulties for U.S. interests in Iraq, the Gulf region, Lebanon and in Israeli-Palestinian peacemaking,” reports Reuters. Naturally, the illegal U.S. invasion of Iraq, its continuing occupation, its support for reactionary and decadent Gulf monarchies, and above all else its unfailing and unconditional support for the brutal settler state of Israel at the expense of the Palestinians has nothing to do with these ostensible “new difficulties.”

http://kurtnimmo.com/?p=742

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: More serious media attack: Posted by: aussidawg
Why are we even discussing this?
Posted by: MThomson on Jan 31, 2007 12:44 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Please! Some lawyer respond to my inquiry! I'm a low-level journalist, but I have been appalled at the downright lies that have been pushed as NEWS over the past 15 years. Why don't (can't) people like Obama, Kerry and Clinton SUE these people for printing such egregious errors in reporting without meaningful retraction. What do our libel laws mean, what are they worth, if they can't stop this echo chamber of bullshyte!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Here's another lie
Posted by: mizipi on Jan 31, 2007 1:28 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The United States of America is a free and democratic nation.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Here's another lie Posted by: Andie927
Mid-Americana can't afford eternal vigilence
Posted by: eddie torres on Jan 31, 2007 1:56 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Sorry Matt, but Americans are too busy spending their equity loans to pay the price of freedom. That's why the meanest lawyers on the planet work for Exxon-Mobil - because everyone else has little or no net worth.

The meanest lawyers aren't interested in fighting the "good fight" on behalf of a bunch of 14B-31s. ("Mid Americana" - see Acxiom 'Personicx' classification chart of US citizens)

But thanks for keeping your eye on the asylum.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Limbaugh's little smackdown
Posted by: mr.ed on Jan 31, 2007 1:56 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As I recall, Rush got quickly booted off a sports program for making racist comments. Poor, starving baby.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Has everyone seen.....
Posted by: Mewsician on Jan 31, 2007 2:31 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
....."Idiocracy"? If you haven't, run don't walk to the nearest rental place and watch it. Because with a nation full of so many uncurious, unquestioning, anti-intellectual and hate-filled people, that movie gives us a stark look at what's ahead. Watch it and weep.

A nation gets the democracy it deserves. Ever wonder why the likes of Hannity and Limbaugh are NOWHERE near as powerful abroad as they are here? The reason is simple - the people in most industrialized nations like France and Canada take seriously their job of knowing better. There are right-wing idiots everywhere, but NOWHERE are there as many outright ignorant, uninformed citizens as we have plaguing us here in the U.S. We are filled to the rafters with people willing to tolerate and foster the ignorance and lies of Sean Hannity et al. God help us all.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Has everyone seen..... Posted by: Daves not here man
» RE: Has everyone seen..... Posted by: Lauren
A big hairy libel suit sounds about right
Posted by: lessbread on Jan 31, 2007 2:32 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'd think that ditto heads would get a clue that they've been lied to for years after Limbaugh admitted it in the wake of last year's elections: "I no longer am going to have to carry the water for people who I don't think deserve having their water carried." Alas, even that admission wasn't enough. These blowhards survive because their shows afford their listeners justifications to continue living in denial. They provide an insulation from reality and a protection against doubts. Those shows afford their listeners the chance to go on their merry way telling themselves, "It's not my SUV that's killing the planet. It's not my addiction to oil that's bringing war to the Middle East. It's not my ignorance that's destroying democracy. It's those damn liberals..."

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

OH BOY - THEY GOT IT COMING!!
Posted by: chanceny on Jan 31, 2007 2:34 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
When CBS fired Dan Rather for reporting the truth, discrediting our uniting/decider Clueless George's lack of armed service actual service, (albeit with questoinable documentation), that said it all! When decorated war veteran Sen. Jonn Kerry, was accused of cowardice and shooting a Vietnamese child in the back, the mainstream media booked the perpetrators of the fraud on all their bs 'news' shows. So many little slanders, so many vilifications of honest men and women, so little vengeance seeking. Pres. Clinton couldn't escape the multitude of vicious slander that hounded him from day one. The machine was well oiled as soon as he won election, thus ruining the wet dream of the neoconartists - immediate gratification in enacting their warped vision of world domination. They had to endure democratic rule for 8 long insufferable years, but would do so while inflicting as much pain, distortion, innuendo and outright outrageous lies, with absolutely no thought to the harm they were unleashing on our country. With the aiding and abetting of our mainstrean, deballed, corporate lacky media, a popular and qualified president was embarrassed and impeached. Our country was humiliated. Hillary called it 'a great right-wing conspiracy and she was labelled paranoid and delusional. Now we're reaping what has been sown by these corporate-owned liars. We can't sit idly by, a retraction here, a bs apology there. We need to fight each and every slander the second it falls from the twisted drooling hole spouting it. We must OK Corral. We can't bipartisan. We certainly should never underestimate the power of hateful rhetoric and believe that the good common sense of Americans will debunk or ignore the hateful crapola flung by these smirking morons holding open microphones or writing mendacious and sordid stories. Let's do a Cheney on their asses. Fire a fistful of truthful buckshot at their bullshitting faces and watch the chickenhawk chickenshit cowards run amok! IT'S THE LEAST WE CAN DO!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: OH BOY - THEY GOT IT COMING!! Posted by: poppop_schell
» Oh PLEASE. Posted by: Aimleft
» RE: Oh PLEASE. Posted by: SicfkOfBush
» The Sad Thing Is..... Posted by: Aimleft
» to PopPop Posted by: Ellie1
» A new TV show? Posted by: launcher
» RE: A new TV show? Posted by: jaxart
» RE: A new TV show? Posted by: billfaster
» RE: A new TV show? Posted by: Ellie1
» RE: A new TV show? Posted by: billfaster
Res Ipsa Loquitor
Posted by: Skate Daddy on Jan 31, 2007 3:18 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I think Dr. Thompson would be proud of your writing.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Lying will stop when liars are punished
Posted by: bcgirl125 on Jan 31, 2007 4:06 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Remember the old Enquirer, full of made up stories about celebrities? They were successfully sued by a number of their victims, and that little rag now checks facts carefully before they publish. A billion-dollar lawsuit against Faux Noise would clean them up, too.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

State of Lies
Posted by: bohdan on Jan 31, 2007 4:07 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We have been living in a state of lies ever since Bush assumed the Presidency. Granted all administrations have lied at some level, but the trend in this administration has spread like a cancerous plague, leaving no one safe from the Republican virus of deceit.

The news media can write articles and voice opinions about how President George W. Bush and his cronies have lied about this and that. (In fact, what took them so long to realize that.) But, this still means nothing. Such revelations of Truth have become the back and forth cackle of gossiping spin masters signifying nothing, as nothing has changed.

Hypocrisy has enjoyed a stable home in the Republican state of mind. Unfortunately it has also cost thousands of innocent lives. And will continue to bring home more coffins of brave soldiers who are being used as fodder for delusional vanity.

To stop this near psychotic mania the real deal will finally surface only when one reporter, that first one, upon being chosen by President Bush to ask a question at one of his press opportunities, stands up and summons the Strength and Courage to ask, " Mr. President, when you lied about...!" Or, at the very least,... “Mr. President, were you lying when you said that you always listened to what your Generals and Commanders had recommended...?” --- And with a follow up to address his evasiveness as it is sure to be offered instead of the Truth.

That's what it will take --- before the rest of them will do the same. It's time for someone to say that the Emperor has no clothes to his face.

That's also when the evidence for "IMPEACHMENT" will be brought forth before the American Public, as it should be for such crimes, and that's when it will mean something. Now we only hear the Truth as it is, "...twisted by knaves to make a trap for fools." (Kipling)

Just as Republicans with the help of the media frenzy constantly accused Clinton of lying about his "private life", that "lie" brought the Public into play, so can the Press bring out the Truth in Bush's hierarchy? And let's put Bush and Cheney under oath as well. Only then, will the Wisdom of Truth find its place in our great land.

Until then, lying continues to be the United States government's national pastime. We have come to expect it. We take it for granted. We kill and die for it. And the shadows of sadness remain our constant companions..

--- WHO WILL HAVE THE COURAGE TO ASK FOR THE TRUTH?

So far, no one!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: State of Lies Posted by: Lauren
Solution: Bring cable nets into purview of revamped FCC
Posted by: Moonray on Jan 31, 2007 4:54 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Successfully suing the U.S. media for libel is very difficult because you have to prove malicious intent. Such suits should be pursued where practical, but in the meantime we should demand that Congress rewrite laws to:

-- Revamp the FCC to make it a progressive, public-oriented body instead of the shameless industry tool it is now.

-- Bring cable networks under the FCC and bring back the Fairness Doctine to help ensure that a wide variety of views are presented. The cable net move might be difficult to achieve, but a good argument can be made in court that cable nets transcend the private sector and in effect are public utilities.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

If Hannity is innocent then Josef Goebbels is also innocent.
Posted by: ng1944 on Jan 31, 2007 5:31 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Joesef Goebbels probably turning in his grave
looking at all this scum that we call corporate media

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Hit 'em where it hurts
Posted by: kladinvt on Jan 31, 2007 5:50 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Just as the solution for dealing with born-agains who meddle in politics is to reverse their tax-exemptions;
the best way to get back at those on 'hate-tv' is to introduce A LA CARTE TV!
If viewers had the opportunity to choose the TV stations they will have to pay for on their cable, it's pretty obvious that FoxNews would lose quite a bit of their viewership...along with Pat Robertson, Jerry Falwell, the shopping channels etc....
Take away their revenue & they'll shut-up!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Hit 'em where it hurts Posted by: diegueno
» RE: Hit 'em where it hurts Posted by: Lauren
more to worry about
Posted by: opeluboy on Jan 31, 2007 6:48 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Actually, I agree that Fox should be ridiculed whenever possible, but there are several other lies, and much more dangerous to us all, that are regularly repeated by even the so-called"liberal media:

Sadam kicked the weapons inspectors out.

Arafat turned down a generous offer.

Ahmadinejad called for Israel to be "wiped off the map."

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: more to worry about Posted by: Paul D
» RE: more to worry about Posted by: Lauren
Use Your Head
Posted by: braxxian on Jan 31, 2007 7:13 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Characters like Hannity and Coulter get by on sheer volume and spite. The best way to combat these stormtroopers in suits is to be educated and know the truth. There are many great books and sources of information on the net about world affairs. So go out there and learn the truth for yourself. Information is power and the last thing these bafoons what is people who kow what's going on in the world. Anyone stupid enough to listen to the likes of Hannity or Coulter deserve whatever they get.

Don't be a sheep.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

It's a question of ownership...that's all
Posted by: thoughtcriminal on Jan 31, 2007 7:58 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If you want to know why the lies that Fox News 'personalities' spew forth on a daily basis go unquestioned, just look at what else Murdoch's NewsCorp owns:
http://www.cjr.org/tools/owners/newscorp.asp

Almost all corporate media is controlled by one of the following conglomerates: TimeWarner, Viacom, NewsCorp, General Electric, Disney and Advance Publications.

The general trend is for them to layoff more and more people every year, and send direct feeds from corporate headquarters to the outlying districts - so only a handful of propaganda voices are heard, and they are heard everywhere. It's the same approach that Nazi Germany used in their propaganda broadcasts, as well as the Soviet Union: the "Voice of the People"...whatever. Goebbels, the father of modern public relations, shot himself in the head in the end. If only all of his modern followers would do the same.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Goebbels Posted by: zipper696
Barack Obama Got Fox in His own way
Posted by: lafrance on Jan 31, 2007 8:50 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
He has Roger Ailes calling his office twice now pleading with them.
How did Sen. Obama punish the creeps at Faux News?
He did not go on all the programs whining or playing victim as Hillary would do. No. He did it quietly, effectively and with his usual class.
He froze them. He cut them off. No news, no interviews. nothing.
He has given interviews to all the other outlets about various topics but, no new for you! Fox is in a panic and so, Ailes is now calling the Senator's office pleading....
that is how you teach the creeps at Fox.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

drew
Posted by: drew on Feb 1, 2007 2:13 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
While realizing that, practically, it would be a political disaster for a candidate to be associated with a madrassa the fact that it would be a potent charge reflects not just on the liars but also on the receptivity of the people to whom they were lying. There is an inherent bigotry against muslims in the potency of these "charges". We should also be challenging that bigotry as well as the lie itself. We don't raise concerns if a candidate went to a catholic or a baptist school. If we are to defend freedom of religion the people who would accept this lie as a relevant and condeming fact should also be held accountable.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Challenge the bigotry Posted by: rwa
You people are as bad as the mythmakers
Posted by: oneyedjack on Feb 1, 2007 3:47 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
You folks really need to get out in the world once in awhile. You - by virtue of your inane comments - perpetuate the damn lies. Madrassa or Madrasah is an Arabic word for school. Not a terrorist school, not a Taliban school, not a hate the infidel school, but a damn school. By your dizzying debates you help perpetuate the myth.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» omg "Obama went to a school" Posted by: Iconoclast421
» RE: omg "Obama went to a school" Posted by: hellofriends
Standards
Posted by: mizipi on Feb 1, 2007 3:51 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
One thing for sure, the rightwing press machine holds those whom they deem "liberal" to much higher standards than those whom they cheer for. Think of what "whooping and hollering" would be coming from the likes of Limbaugh and Coulter had an aid of VP Gore shot a dog, much less a lawyer/human being - to use an obviuous example. Anyway, there's a thing called karma........................

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Standards Posted by: Lauren
Go after masters
Posted by: ng1944 on Feb 1, 2007 4:58 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Hannity is just barking dog on orders from his owner.
Go after their masters, Murdocks of all sorts

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Dubious Honor
Posted by: Urstrly on Feb 1, 2007 5:01 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Didn't I just read that Roger Ailes got some sort of Freedom of Speech award from a media group? I agree with a previous writer that the best recourse is to freeze them out. Certainly that's what the Bush White House has done to reporters it doesn't like.

In the meantime, we need the Fairness Doctrine back more than ever. Sure, it promoted a kind of Tweedle Dee and Tweedle Dum, but at least TV stations were required to keep track. The right seems to think the FCC is some sort of religious censor to keep sex off of TV. Somehow they don't find blatant lies obscene.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Dubious Honor Posted by: Bozwell
» RE: Dubious Honor Posted by: Lauren
HIT THE LYING THIEVING BASTARDS AT FAUX NEWS WHERE IT HURTS!
Posted by: kc10ken on Feb 1, 2007 5:10 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
BOYCOT faux cable news' sponsors.......it's that simple.

Write to ALL of faux cable news' sponsors and tell them EXACTLY why you are boycotting their products.

You have to hit them where it hurts and in the ONLY language that the slime at FAUX cable news understands....$$$$$$$$.

America has HAD ENOUGH of their fucking BULLSHIT. Faux's viewership is down over 25% from last year.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Consider the source Posted by: jwg
» RE: Consider the source Posted by: Una Voce
wahhhhhhhh wahhhhhhhhh
Posted by: johnny boy on Feb 1, 2007 8:52 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
matt...get a grip. It's good for Hillary....back off jack!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Your Cure is Worse than the Disease
Posted by: druidlaw on Feb 1, 2007 9:00 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
SUE THE BASTARDS? are you for real, Taibbi? Talk about self
hating journalists. We killed ourselves ( literally, by fighting King George and by passing the bill of rights ) to get you the First Amendment, which you have now exercised expertly in debunking the Madrassas story. Hey, wait till you see what they will do with Rudi Giuliani's sex life in Gracie Mansion. And they will not be sueable for Libel...... and if they are, I hope they get court costs ( they, being WE, the Liberal side of candidate bashers, of course ). All's fair in love, war and politics. If Hannity and O'Reilly and the rest want to make themselves laughing stocks when their lies are debunked, so be it. But SUE? intimidate people not to write or say something? Uh Uh! If you don't have an absolutist view of the First Amendment you have a death wish. The people who want to silence you always have a lot more power, money and lawyers than the ones who want to defend freedom of the press. Your only hope is knowing that at the end of the day, that twelve million dollar judgment against you and your paper or publication or blog or whatever will be tossed out and you will get the costs of litigation back. ( which you never will).

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

When the truth cannot be found. . .
Posted by: monkeywrench on Feb 1, 2007 11:40 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
. . .and so the public is forced to make decisions about its government on the basis of whose lies to believe, then democracy becomes impossible to sustain.

Good bye, America.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Hannity, Rush, et al need disclaimers:
Posted by: Hawksana on Feb 1, 2007 11:43 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"The primary purpose of this show is entertainment. The content of this show is not checked for truth or accuracy, and some items related here may have little to no basis in fact."

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Really Want To Punish The Right-Wing Liars?
Posted by: ZPaul on Feb 1, 2007 1:04 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
- What to do?
ORGANIZE. Only by organizing can you really "Punish The Right-Wing Liars".

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Start a campaign
Posted by: harpy on Feb 1, 2007 2:10 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 =