Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Top 10 Solutions for a More Perfect Union

By Katrina vanden Heuvel, The Nation. Posted January 27, 2007.


There are ten good bills awaiting passage in Congress that could make a real difference.

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

More stories by Katrina vanden Heuvel

Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

The "thumping" taken by the Republican Congress on election day was not just a rejection of K Street corruption and the catastrophe in Iraq. It was a call to action on issues that are more immediately relevant to people's lives. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi will begin to answer that call by pushing a "100 Hours" agenda -- including common-sense legislation to increase the minimum wage, cut interest on student loans and open the way for Medicare to negotiate prescription drug prices.

That's a good beginning, but it's only a down payment on a broader agenda. Progressives now have the opportunity to develop a new vision that returns power to the American people for the first time in generations. But to-do lists don't add up to a vision. But Democrats must show they are serious by passing bold measures that define a new "people's agenda." With that in mind, here are ten existing pieces of legislation that deserve to be passed by our new Congress. Some of these bills are eminently passable, a few are related to the "100 Hours" agenda and others can be seen as long-term goals. But all would help return our nation to the path to a more perfect union (note: Bill numbers may change in the new Congress).

1. Healthcare for All

More than 47 million Americans are now living without health coverage. Representative John Conyers's United States National Health Insurance Act (HR 676) would create a single-payer healthcare system by expanding Medicare to every resident. All necessary medical care would be covered -- from prescription drugs to hospital services to long-term care. There would be no deductibles or co-payments. Funding would come from sources including savings from negotiated bulk procurement of medications; a tax on the top 5 percent of income earners; and a phased-in payroll tax that is lower than what employers currently pay for less comprehensive employee health coverage. With 78 Congressional co-sponsors, and the endorsement of more than 200 labor organizations as well as healthcare groups, there is muscle and momentum behind this bill. To get involved, check out Healthcare-Now.org.

2. Counting Every Vote

Representative Rush Holt has introduced the Voter Confidence and Increased Accessibility Act (HR 550) requiring all voting systems to provide a voter-verified paper trail to serve as the official ballot for recounts and audits. It would also insure accessibility for voters with disabilities. The bill, which was introduced in February 2005 and which currently has 222 bipartisan co-sponsors, was tied up in committee by the Republican Congress. Senators Hillary Clinton and Barbara Boxer and Representative Stephanie Tubbs Jones introduced the Count Every Vote Act (S 450 and HR 939), which also calls for a voter-verified paper trail and would improve access for language minority voters, illiterate voters and voters with disabilities. Co-sponsors of that legislation include Senators John Kerry, Frank Lautenberg, Patrick Leahy and Barbara Mikulski, and seventy-nine House members.

3. Healthy Families Act

According to Washington Post columnist Amy Joyce, "nearly half of all private-sector workers in the United States do not have a single day of paid sick leave. And more do not have a paid day off that can be used to care for a sick child." Seventy-five percent of low-wage workers lack paid sick leave -- the very people who can least afford to take a day off and still be able to pay the bills. In 2005 Senator Edward Kennedy and Representative Rosa DeLauro introduced the Healthy Families Act (S 932 and HR 1902) -- a bill that would require employers with fifteen or more workers to provide one week of paid sick leave for those who work thirty or more hours a week. Employees who work less than that would receive prorated leave. The leave could be used to care for family as well. The new Democratic Congress is expected to hold hearings on the legislation, which has fifteen original co-sponsors in the Senate and seventy-one in the House, in early 2007.

4. The Right to Organize

The Employee Free Choice Act (S 842 and HR 1696) would strengthen workers' freedom to organize by requiring employers to recognize a union after a majority of workers sign cards authorizing representation. It also would create stronger penalties for management violations of the right to organize when workers seek to form a union. Currently there are 214 co-sponsors of Representative George Miller's House bill (including fourteen Republicans) and forty-four co-sponsors of Kennedy's legislation in the Senate (including Republican Senator Arlen Specter). This legislation would go a long way toward helping the 57 million nonunion workers in the United States who, according to polls, would form a union tomorrow if given the opportunity.

5. No Permanent Bases in Iraq

Representative Barbara Lee, co-chair of the Congressional Progressive Caucus, has proposed House Conference Resolution 197, which declares that it is "the policy of the United States not to enter into any base agreement with the Government of Iraq that would lead to a permanent United States military presence in Iraq." By passing this bill, Congress can send a clear and immediate signal to the Iraqi people and the international community that the United States has no intention of staying in Iraq indefinitely. There were eighty-six co-sponsors of Lee's legislation, including three Republicans.


Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: top ten, progressive agenda

Katrina vanden Heuvel is editor of The Nation.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Good start
Posted by: MartianBachelor on Jan 27, 2007 12:33 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As two of the items on the list have to do with elections, I think somewhere in there

1) ballot access issues, and
2) instant runoff voting (or "preferential voting")

need to be in the mix of important and badly needed reforms to effect real change. It is simply not enough to funnel more money and count all the votes of the "two" monopoly parties in a system rigged to their benefit.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Good start Posted by: willymack
Don't forget the less well-off
Posted by: anothername on Jan 27, 2007 3:38 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Questions:

We put in campaign spending limits. What happens when the social worker decides to run for Congress but needs the income from campaign fundraising to pay her salary while she seeks office? How even is campaign finance when that social worker is running against a multi-millionaire who lives off of his investment earnings and can use his full campaign financing for staff, handouts, mailings, television commercials, etc.?

Let's improve voting by having the government pay for free transit service on any election day. This way the poorer citizens could be more likely to reach the voting location.

Here's an even better suggestion, require tenants, not just property owners, to receive information on important changes happening in their neighborhood or to their building, then give them some rights of input. Apartments and trailer parks are an investment for the owner, but we have too many landlords and landladys who view ownership as a money maker, while they ignore the emotional feelings that many tenants have to their units as a home.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Not a bad start
Posted by: WhatNow? on Jan 27, 2007 5:52 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Here's a couple more:

11) End the war on drugs and terror.

12) Encourage the use of hemp for paper, clothing, food, and building materials.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Not a bad start Posted by: maxpayne
» RE: Not a bad start Posted by: Krain61
» RE: Not a bad start Posted by: anechoic
Only on new law is needed
Posted by: mizipi on Jan 27, 2007 6:15 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
#1. Do away with the federl government and allow each state, the District of Columbia and all territories to become independent nations. Everyone would have a much bigger say in their on affairs and the out-of-touch politicians in Washington would be out of a job. Niether my senators nor my congressman represents my interests. Nor do they represent the citizens of my state. They present themselves to the hog trough of federal monies, all $8 kabillion of national debt, that can in no way ever be paid-off. In other words, let's get out while the getting is no worse than it is now. I have lost faith in my government trying to represent 300,000,000 people of so many different beliefs. Plus, down here in Mississippi, there is no reason for any terrorist attacks, except those launched in Washington, DC. We are one of those "taker" states, in that we get a lot more federal monies than we pay in. I sincerely believe that we can and could take better care of ourselves. We are not perfect here and we have plenty of problems, but I think Mississippians of every race can handle our affairs better than Uncle Sam. Let's return the power to the people and take it away from the bloated federal government.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Only on new law is needed Posted by: Chris_the_marketer
» No problem Posted by: mizipi
» RE: No problem Posted by: justAnEgg
» RE: No problem Posted by: whoever
» Part 2 - not very long Posted by: mizipi
» RE: Part 2 - not very long Posted by: justAnEgg
» RE: Part 2 - not very long Posted by: mizipi
» Probably so Posted by: mizipi
#6
Posted by: mazel on Jan 27, 2007 6:44 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I wonder why a list is necessary. I can't see any good reason for removing a detainee from this country in the first place. Why not a law that prohibits taking them anywhere outside the US? It would be much simpler.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Control The Corporations!
Posted by: TarryFaster on Jan 27, 2007 7:17 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Until we "de-humanize" the corporations, get them out of politics and forbid them from writing our laws, we are surely doomed!

Click here for a more complete explanation.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Control The Corporations! Posted by: NumberSix
» RE: Control The Corporations! Posted by: TarryFaster
» RE: Control The Corporations! Posted by: NumberSix
» RE: Control The Corporations! Posted by: CounterCorp
» RE: Control The Corporations! Posted by: Chris_the_marketer
» RE: Control The Corporations! Posted by: TarryFaster
One more thing...welfare system...
Posted by: distancebiker23 on Jan 27, 2007 7:52 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Considering how much the welfare system is abused by the population, I think the government at all levels should crack down and review each person using welfare, and decide who truly need it and who doesn't. It is especially noticeable in my state, where welfare is given out sometimes just to increase the amount of government money raked in to the state. It's something I noticed could be added to the list, a slight reform on how welfare is given out.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» The new slavery Posted by: mizipi
Pass laws to curb president's war-making powers, cut defense budget
Posted by: Moonray on Jan 27, 2007 8:20 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The listed bills are excellent, but we also need to rewrite the War Powers Act to put strict limits on overseas troop deployments and increase congressional input into military actions.

What's more, Congress should overhaul defense procurement procedures to reduce corruption and waste, and slash defense spending by at least one-third. This could be accomplished by closing many unneeded bases overseas and in the U.S. and by scrapping costly, wasteful weapons programs such as new fighter jets, submarines, aircraft carriers, tanks, etc. PLUS the new generation of nuclear bombs that is expected to cost at least $100 billion.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Try some of these on for size
Posted by: Khaidea on Jan 27, 2007 1:34 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Dont forget:
1. Stop the war on drugs! To many people are being sent away for simple possesion charges. Yhere are better ways to handle the situation. It is time to help instead of incarserate.
2. Get rid of mandatory sentenceing laws. Let judges be judges and access prision sentences on a one on one basis.
3. make sure big companies stop exploiting worker with minimun saleries. Up minimun wage to a survival wage.
4. Make law enforcement accountable to the public. Stop them from racial profiling and profiting from a misuse of authority.
5.Reduce politians salleries to a reasonable amount. They should be doing their job out of love not finacial gain.

There are alot of changes that can be done to improve the status of the American public, the polititians just need to be doing it for the American public and not for themselves

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Uh Fairness Doctrine?
Posted by: H_H on Jan 27, 2007 3:46 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What about bringing-back the Fairness Doctrine for broadcasting?

Seriously, it'll kill FOX News as it currently exists.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

1st we need to get rid
Posted by: Krain61 on Jan 27, 2007 4:41 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
the SHADOW GOVERNMENT {Federal Reserve}
There will be nothing done till that's done.
They the Fed owns us and they own our Government.
When we start coining our own money interest will stop
hammering at us and inflation will just about stop.
Everything else will be just lip service to get our votes.
Does anyone truely believe either party is really going
to help?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Good ideas in a perfect world
Posted by: Chris_the_marketer on Jan 28, 2007 4:13 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We don't live in a perfect world with unlimited resources. I often wonder when I see such 10 "ways" to change things. . if people actually think these through?

HealthCare for instance. You know that healthcare companies innovation comes from the % of revenue? Decrease the revenue, you decrease innovation. (oh it works in Canada, because today we are footing the bill).

Also, whats to stop people from getting a free new expensive drug and selling it on the black market. . . what are the controls? I want every american to have healthcare but I want a) people to be personaly responsible for their healthcare (i.e. some out of pocket) b) people who can pay, should pay.

Unions? Today? Anybody read world is flat? We need a flexible workforce if we don't want to see rapidly rising unemployment. You want powerfull unions? look at france?! young people in france suffer a 20-30+ unemployment rate.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

ECLECTICIST.S. JIM RODRIGUEZ
Posted by: SJR505 on Jan 28, 2007 6:29 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
..."WHAT IS IT THAT YOU DO NOT UNDERSTAND...???" THE CORPORATIONS, GREEDY ELITISTS, BANKS, NEOCOMS, OIL/GAS PHARISEES, AND BUSH 43 & COMPADRES, THE 'DECLARED PATRIOTS OF OUR COUNTRY ARE ONLY INTERESTED IN KEEPING AND EXPANDING THEIR NET WORTH...THE OLD INDIAN ADAGE: "WHITE MEN SPEAK WITH FORKED TONGUES..." COMES INTO PLAY TODAY AS WELL AS IN YESTERYEAR...
CONGRESSMEN'S VOTING IS HELTER-SKELTER, YES TO HEALTH,NO TO HEALTHCARE; NO TO VOTING RIGHTS, YES TO EDUCATION AND VICE VERSA...THE SAME OLD REFRAINS COME THROUGH : IT IS TOO EARLY IN THE CAMPAIGN TO SUPPORT CANDIDATE X, Y OR Z...ETC.
AND , FOR THOSE WHO BELIEVE IN THE TOOTH FAIRY, THEN FOLLOW BUSH AND CHENEY, FOR OTHER SUPPORT THE IMPEACHMENT...
THE QUESTION THAT HAS NOT BEEN ASKED IS: "WHY OR WHAT HAS GOT US INTO THIS CACA....???NOT,WHETHER THE SURGE IS A GOOD/BAD STRATEGY...EITHER WAY , LIVES/ COSTS WILL RISE...
THE STUPIDITY AND INCOMPETENCE OF BUSH AND HIS NEOCOMS HAVE NOW COME TO REST FOR ALL, I SAID ALL, THE WORLD TO KNOW...BUSH IS THE LEGAL LEADER OF A HOLOCOUST OF FREE MEN AND IS ON PARALLEL TO HITLER, MAO, STALIN, ETC...WHAT A TITLE...

S. JIM RODRIGUEZ+++ECLETCICIST SPIRIT SEEKER+++

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Not Good Enough
Posted by: Aravoth on Jan 28, 2007 6:45 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I have to ask whether the Executive Branch or the Congress represent the best interests of America and it's people.
The congress knows very well that illegal immigration needs to be addressed right now. The congress needs to address foreign consortiums taking over our highways and turning them into toll roads. American tax payers paid for these highways and the states have no business selling our roads for a fast fix it buck. What is congress doing about outsourcing jobs to foreign countries for cheap labor?
At what point will the government start paying down the $8.6 trillion federal reserve debt? This debt will never reduce if we continue only to pay interests payments.
There are so many important issues, these are just a few.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Post this on the wall - like ten commandments, + ONE
Posted by: dale0k on Jan 28, 2007 6:48 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
These initiatives would go a long way toward restoring sanity to public discourse and direction this country is following ...

Add to this list - REINSTATE the FAIRNESS doctrine!!!!

This would curtail the propaganda machines mascarading as "news" and "entertainment" and make broadcasters and other media responsible for the biased crap they dispense.

People are lied to constantly, and coerced to believe and vote against their own best interest.

Time to clean up the "dirt" on the airwaves ...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Fairness Doctrine, and some others
Posted by: whoever on Jan 28, 2007 11:33 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I jumped for joy when I saw two other posters mention this extremely smart idea. It gets around the idiot Supreme Court's notion that money is speech, so we can't restrict schlock from the rich. [And also, I admit, the pretty sensible idea that people with free speech rights ought to be able to broadcast ads they want to pay for.] A simple provision that rival candidates get 50 seconds of air time immediately following every minute paid for by their opponents [or schlocked up by biased media corporations] (and time to prepare a rebuttal message) would go a long way toward balancing propagandizing, cutting lying, and reducing the impact of war chests and donors on candidates and elections. It's much better than public financing of campaigns, which rarely provides funds that can match the private donation pots that buy the souls of candidates of both parties.

However, there are some other proposals that I don't see on the list, that would help this country a lot:
1. War Profiteering Tax: set at 100% of every penny of extra profits a company earns as a result of sales to the Defense Department or intelligence agencies during times when American troops are involved in combat operations.

2. Profiteering Politician Act: a tax set at 200% of the income flowing to a political office-holder from investment interests that profit from militarily-related activities.

3. Warmongering Act: defining political speeches or other arguments, concerning proposed US military activities, that include claims of fact that both are false and misrepresent intelligence data, as felonious acts that bring immediate, automatic jail time to their perpetrators.

Even on Alternet, I rarely see the words 'war profiteering', which is a big part of what the Iraq war is about (the other big part is Republican electioneering, of course). It would be tricky for Bush, etc., to justify support for war profiteering.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Care--not insurance
Posted by: ssmit355 on Jan 28, 2007 11:49 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Any time the word insurance is used: bet on a profiteering scam.

Health care differs significantly from health insurance; I turn down heatlh insurance (usually) when it's avaiblable to me, because then I will spend less on health-care.

If someone makes profit from me before I get care, then I pay twice--the doctors get profit too. When health care is caring I'll buy it.

As it is--I get to scam. I change jobs when I need health care so I can benefit from using insurance immediately: then I quit. Too bad folks. Live and learn.

I am the House; not them. (The House wins.)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Good Bills,but Congress still failed the American People
Posted by: jeffrey7 on Jan 28, 2007 12:51 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
How? Because in their first 100 hours they did not remove all the powers given to the oval office on 9/12! They did not process an arrest warrant for Bush and Cheney. They gave Big Biznuss ( yes I know how to spell it) a fat break by making the minimum wage hike not take effect for two years.Then only a poultry amount of increase,for being without one for 10 years,it should have been upwards of $10/hour. This Congress,The current crop of Presidential hopefuls don't deserve the time it takes to pass gas. Except for the 'newbies' they all voted to give the oval office more power than it needed. Many have been there for too long and all of them are connected to vast sums of capital. Both from their Parties and their own wealth. All of them are completely corrupted, as Public 'Servants' and as People.
The People,who are the true power, have been sold out to the highest bidder,we will be spoon fed,via the media, just enough to make us think we're informed. Then the same old 'Walk the walk,Talk the talk' bullshit will keep going on.
Reality of it is,if you give a damn,and say so,then back it up with action,you 'Walk your talk'.Something no one in D.C. has the stones to do. Except for Bush/Cheney,they've admitted they are assholes and continue to prove it.
The wealthy run D.C. plain and simple. If you don't get that,you've been under a rock for far too long. If you believe'If you're wealthy you must be a good person', you're in a delusion of near suicidal proportions.
These good bills outlined above and a good government by and for the People can only be had when THEY have to live on the minimum wage they profess for the rest of us. Hell they only worked 93 days last year. How many of us would still have our minimum wage jobs if we did that? NONE!!!!
It's time to scrap the republic,yes that's what we really are,
by restoring true democracy and flushing the 'Old-Boy down on our knees' way of doing Governance.
Peace People,
Jeffrey7

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Run-off voting
Posted by: timebomb734 on Jan 29, 2007 12:44 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
A good addition to this list would be run-off voting. Here in Minneapolis we passed a bill to reinstate this system and it will be in effect for the next election.
Run-off voting allows voters to elect a first choice candidate. If that candidate receives less a than a specified percentage of the votes, then the vote is cast for the second choice candidate. It is intended to encourage people to vote for the candidate they truly believe in, regardless of third party status. We'll see how it turns out...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: un-off voting Posted by: mazel
Stop the Drug War!!!
Posted by: gigorgei on Jan 29, 2007 5:44 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The most disgusting thing about our country is the way we treat each other. Thus, the arguement over Iraq remains about our troops and not the civilians of Iraq. Here in this country we have the highest percentage of our population serving time and being raped in prison over non-violent crimes. This needs to be dealt with, we cannot proceed to be the, "Land of the Free" when we cause a social problem of this magnitude. This is our own biggest civil rights issue that most of our elected officials are ignoring.......because we let them.
"The world is a dangerous place, but it is not due to the evil people. It is because good people sit back and do nothing." Albert Einstein replying to why he thought the holocaust was not stopped.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

But How do we STOP BUSH and future Bushs?
Posted by: common intelligence on Jan 29, 2007 8:41 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I've see the constitutents distractions enough to see everyone is getting duped again. I Watched in part Clinton, Obama, and Guiliani's BS campaigns for the 2008.
The distratcion is: On to 2008 elections. Bush is literally going to get away with murder and leaving the world with his mess.

But no one, and now even Pelosi is caving into, as I knew she would, to exposing the truth or even concerned with implimenting governmental provisions into the constitution to see that the position of the President is permently restricted and containedfrom the the abuses of power that this administration has instilled.

If it is as in the Campaigns being propounded about the future, we must as americans address this critical issue or all the before mentioned (10) provisions have no value but distrations.

The congress must, as a primary objective, immediately secure the constitution from abuses of power.
I beg every single person to write every single rep and senator to put into the agenda provisions to restrict and contain Presidental power for now and the future. But more so STOP BUSH NOW.

Watch the distractions. even the peace distractions. Those campaigns and rallies focus people on "the WAR". But that means nothing unless Bush is Stopped.

STOP BUSH and you will STOP the WAR.
STOP BUSH and you will get health care
STOP BUSH and you will get a better education
STOP BUSH and there can be real Social security
(and for all you ditsy republicans whom think social security is socialism, just think when you get old and your medical bills drain every drop of your retirement 'if you have one' and you can't afford to take care of you elderly parents because you are too affraid youself how nice it would be to have enough to pay for your old folks home and have someone look in after you because you can't aford a can of dog food!)

Yup, STOP BUSH and there will begin a "possible" transformation. Otherwise it's all Washington BS

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

How about a "No EMPIRE" statement?
Posted by: justaguy on Jan 29, 2007 11:52 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Stopping permanent bases is a start, but the conduct of the Pentagon's plans for global domination via "full spectrum dominance" needs to be understood and stopped by the US populace.

Same goes for US "unconditional support" for the Israeli elite's grab for everything they can steal. Cut off funding until they make peace and drop their expansionist agenda.

Won't happen but, hey, it doesn't hurt to dream sometime.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

BS
Posted by: billfaster on Feb 22, 2007 12:09 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"...With 78 Congressional co-sponsors, and the endorsement of more than 200 labor organizations...," - 200 labor Organizations. Have you not thought about that figure for one second? Of course they are behind this as it shifts the premium payments to the Government (our tax dollars) from the employers they represent...duhh...What about someone like me, for example, who pays for his own insurance without an employer contribution. You would advocate that my employer, through higher payroll taxes, pay my socialistic, government sponsored insurance. Where would this money come from? Obviously, my employer would be forced to lay off employees in order to off-set the higher payroll tax they are forced to pay. What about these unfortunate workers? Additionally, the top 5% of income earners pay a whopping 57% of all tax revenues collected. You are advocating that 5% of all workers as well as their employers bear the burden of the cost of socialized medicine for 100% of the country's population - this is absurd! You obviously know nothing about economics...Why don't you move to Canada, England or Europe instead?

Let's get real here for a moment. Studies indicate that a vast majority of the uninsured in this country are voluntarily self-insured. Another high percentage of these uninsured individuals are transitioning between jobs and are thus only uninsured for a very short period of time. Moreover, the elderly have insurance through Medicare and the poor have insurance through Medicaid. Lastly, the ones who fall through the cracks cannot be denied coverage from their local emergency rooms. So, what exactly is the problem? Just ask the hospitals along the Mexican border who are poised for bankruptcy as they are legally not allowed to turn away illegal immigrants. I suppose you have a solution for this also...

The main difference between you and me is the idea of self reliance. I believe in smaller government as time and time again they have proven that they have no business meddling in the affairs of private enterprise. Every time they attempt this, it turns out to be a bloated, economic failure. The democrats love to spout off the fact that an average family can't afford to raise a family on minimum wage, for example. However, the flip side of that coin is that the average middle class American cannot afford to maintain a 150 foot yacht either. So what is the solution? The middle class American should not take on more debt than they can handle and the worker on minimum wage should not have a family if they cannot afford to pay for diapers...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]