Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
100 words for 100 days: submit your 100 word essay and get published on AlterNet
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

The Terrorists of Our Imagination Aren't Muslims ... They're Us

By Anneli Rufus, AlterNet. Posted January 27, 2007.


Terrorism is now the stuff of fiction, as a glance at the best-seller lists will attest. But while Islamic plotters make the headlines, the terrorists we find on the bookshelves live in our own backyard.
01272007story
01272007Story

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

More stories by Anneli Rufus

Get AlterNet in
your mailbox!

 
Advertisement

Every era has its own built-in drama -- its plague or despot by which it will be remembered, whose looming menace inflects every conversation, kindles every sermon, tints every work of art. Ours is terrorism. A time of collapsing towers and exploding public-transit vehicles with charred guts ribboning the wrack is how this epoch will be pictured, centuries hence. But then to truly inhabit this era, to speak its language, I must add: if there even are centuries, hence.

Striving to picture our reality, future generations -- if there are future generations -- will sniff their anodyne air for phantom whiffs of ash or poison gas as they pore over novels published right now -- because terrorists have become stock characters in post-9/11 fiction just as spies were during the Cold War or pointy-horned demons in Dante's Florence. Maybe our descendants will read John Updike's "Terrorist" (Knopf, 2006). Its titular New Jersey teen -- Ahmad Mulloy, son of an Irish-American mother and long-gone Egyptian-student dad -- joins a jihadist cell plotting to blow up the Lincoln Tunnel and reveres an imam who intones, "The American way is the way of infidels. It is headed for a terrible doom." Perhaps they'll read Patrick Neate's City of Tiny Lights (Viking, 2005), whose hilarious private-eye narrator is an ex-mujahadeen who learned in Afghanistan how to slash a man from "his navel to his chops," and persuades an adoring young "thug lite" to infiltrate a jihadist cell plotting to blow up the London tube. (This book was published in the United Kingdom a week before the real London tube bombings of July 7, 2005.) Or they could read Xavier Waterkeyn and Daniel Lalic's "Where's Bin Laden?" (New Holland, 2006), a wacky cartoon romp in which readers are urged to locate the bearded Saudi in colorfully drawn city and circus scenes. They could pick up a copy of Robert Wilson's "The Hidden Assassins" (Harcourt, 2006), in which a bomb destroys a Seville apartment block amid clues resembling those found around the 2004 Madrid train bombings. Or maybe they'll tackle Vikram Chandra's "Sacred Games" (Harper Collins, 2007), whose brooding cops race around Mumbai seeking a nuclear bomb they know that fanatics have built and which is poised to explode.

Novelists love built-in dramas. Think of all that time and effort saved which would otherwise be spent having to invent plots, characters, motivations, denouements. Terrorists plug handily into any genre. Thrillers. Sci-fi. Romance: Belinda ached for his touch. But why was he so reluctant to talk about his flying lessons?

And the trend factor sells. Publishers dream of reviewers trilling: "A real-life drama ripped from the headlines!" and "A tale for our times!" Surely that helped Chandra score a million-dollar advance from Harper Collins, which then budgeted another $300,000 for marketing "Sacred Games." Granted, Chandra crafts characters so authentic that you can practically hear their knuckles crack. But for a 900-page hardcover novel that's one big bet.

We didn't ask to live in an era when subways blow up. Or, to put a finer point on it, when people blow them up. But that's the way it is. So terrorists are stock characters not merely in mass-market drugstore-rack airport-shop blockbuster potboilers but in intellectual epics whose authors are professors praised by the Guardian and who win prestigious prizes. Neate won the Whitbread, one of the United Kingdom's top awards. Chandra won another -- the Commonwealth Writers Prize -- and teaches at UC Berkeley. Updike has won two Pulitzers, though the last one was 16 years ago.

OK, so what insights do all these novels offer into who terrorists really are and how they feel and what they want? Well, here's a spoiler warning. Beaucoup spoilers follow. Chandra and Wilson -- a Brit who has won the Gumshoe and Gold Dagger Awards and lives in Portugal -- are among those who engage in a bit of psy-ops. Knowing that today's typical Western reader is inclined to imagine terrorists as Muslims, the authors set things up so as to appear that Muslims are indeed perpetrating mayhem on an apocalyptic scale. In "The Hidden Assassins," a van containing a Koran, explosive residue, a black hood-mask and a green sash emblazoned with Arabic script stands parked alongside the bombed apartment block. The van's registration is traced to a man named Mohammed who is on a government watch list. A victim mutters: "We all know who it is, don't we? ... the Moroccans." Another character observes that ever since the Madrid train bombings, locals have "been watching them go into that mosque and wondering." When a cop muses that the evidence is puzzling, his colleague retorts: "Explosives, the Koran and a green sash and black hood don't sound confusing to me." Yobs in a bar go ape when a TV pundit suggests it might be anyone but Muslims.

Arabic missives sent to police headquarters the press insist: "We will not rest until Andalucía is back in the bosom of Islam." Pondering the "connections made by Islamic cell members in Spain with the perpetrators of the Twin Towers and Washington, D.C. attacks," a national security agent sighs that "there seems to be an unending stream of young operatives." Arabic blueprints are discovered outlining a Beslan-type hostage operation, specifying that children should be shot "until the Spanish government recognized Andalucía as an Islamic state under Sharia law."


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: terrorism, fiction, plot

Anneli Rufus is the author of several books, including "Party of One: The Loners' Manifesto."

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
huh?
Posted by: edith on Jan 27, 2007 4:05 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
let's leave the complexities of plotting to novelists. most novels end up on the remainder list pretty quickly. The meandering effort at breathlessness and social criticism contained in the mish mash book(s) review here leads nowhere and, if the intent was to discourage readers to take a chance on one of the "terrorism" novels reviewed breathlessly and superficially here, it succeeded.

So terrorism is on our minds. What an insight! (No doubt Athenians used to think about the fascist hordes of Sparta pounding at the their gates too.).

One thing's for sure. The writer here will not be writing any taut, lean short stories anytime soon.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Pogo, Pogo, Pogo
Posted by: mizipi on Jan 27, 2007 4:59 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
For five years, ever since Gerge & Co have been thugarizing those who they call terrorists, I have been trying to get people to realize that we, the USA, assasinate people, are the only nation to ever use a nuclear weapon, blah, blah, blah...and I would sum it up by saying, WE HAVE MET THE TERRORISTS, AND THEY IS US.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Pogo, Pogo, Pogo Posted by: Pirate1
» RE: Pogo, Pogo, Pogo Posted by: perri6
» RE: Pogo, Pogo, Pogo Posted by: SALLY EVANS
» RE: Pogo, Pogo, Pogo Posted by: sheena2u
» AMEN, to all of you! Posted by: mizipi
Tear down, the American wall of deception.
Posted by: ErHoff on Jan 27, 2007 5:43 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The patriotic wall of delusion is tall, it blocks out much of the revealing light. So where is the hope?

Hope to get the masses grounded in reality?
Enter the case of the leakers, and the pressure of the case for perjury against Scooter Libby.

Libby was one of those behind the attacks of 9-11.

Let's hope that with enough pressure and some good work by Mr. Fitzgerald we can start to tear down the wall.

Of course I would like to see the honorable Ms Plame vindicated, but I hope that America can learn the truth about 9-11, and to see in fact that one of the key players is on the stand, the is hope that some truth will come to be known, a crack in the wall.

Just how many were on the take in the community and over at the pentagon is something that needs to be revealed if America can come out of denial. 9-11 was an inside job, and too many Americans will fight for their delusions, like religion.

Tear down, the American wall of deception. The war on terror is a lie.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Chimp as Muslim Terrorist.
Posted by: douglashoyt on Jan 27, 2007 6:31 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
That is the best picture of the chimp I have seen in months. Great job.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Chimp as Muslim Terrorist. Posted by: FastEddy
Thanks for touching on an important subject
Posted by: thoughtcriminal on Jan 27, 2007 7:43 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Reportedly, during the Vietnam War Pentagon planners opposed trying to "get inside the heads and hearts of the enemy" because that might "weaken our resolve". Translation: it turns out that these people on the other side of the country have legitimate grievances against the US government, who invaded their country for ulterior purposes under false pretense.

Now, Thomas Friedman would tell you that that's an attempt to 'justify the terrorist's actions', but it's not, any more than a FBI psychologist's attempt to 'get inside' the head of a serial murderer is an attempt at justification.

After all , the 9/11 hijackers must have had a reason for killing themselves just to 'get them' - and the arguments of 'they wanted the promised 75 virgins', etc. are nonsense - really what you have is Arab nationalism, backed by religous ideology - the same factors that led the Mujehedeen in Afghanistan to fight against the Soviets, and which resulted in Reagan inviting five of them to the White House in the early 80's (damn, I remember the photo but can't seem to find it online - Reagan and five beared guys in turbans on the White House lawn - priceless) and praising the 'brave freedom fighters' - a theme that was picked up in "Rambo III" when Rambo goes to Afghanistan to fight the evil Soviets with his Muslim brothers...

The last thing Bush&Co. want is for the American people to develop any sympathy for oppressed peoples around the globe, whether they live in the Palestinian regions, the African regions, Central and South America, the Mideast, or anywhere else. They might then come to learn that it's the American Empire that has done much of the oppressing, and which is also responsible for creating 'the terrorists'.

Orwell described his view of the future of England in the essay England Your England (1941):
"The intellectuals who hope to see it Russianised or Germanised will be disappointed. The gentleness, the hypocrisy, the thoughtlessness, the reverence for law and the hatred of uniforms will remain, along with the suet puddings and the misty skies. It needs some very great disaster, such as prolonged subjugation by a foreign enemy, to destroy a national culture. The Stock Exchange will be pulled down, the horse plough will give way to the tractor, the country houses will be turned into children's holiday camps, the Eton and Harrow match will be forgotten, but England will still be England, an everlasting animal stretching into the future and the past, and, like all living things, having the power to change out of recognition and yet remain the same."

The other option, from George Orwell's 1984:

"There will be no curiosity, no enjoyment of the process of life. All competing pleasures will be destroyed. But always — do not forget this, Winston — always there will be the intoxication of power, constantly increasing and constantly growing subtler. Always, at every moment, there will be the thrill of victory, the sensation of trampling on an enemy who is helpless. If you want a picture of the future, imagine a boot stamping on a human face …for ever."

Bush is in favor of the latter - 'intoxication of power' is what drives him, Kissinger, Rumsfeld, Cheney and the rest of the psychotics.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Are You the Terrorist Next Door? By CHARLOTTE LAWS
Posted by: rwa on Jan 27, 2007 8:02 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I was an ordinary American until November 27, 2006 when I became a terrorist or more accurately what I call a "stand-by terrorist." Perhaps I cannot truly own this newfound nickname until the government decides to prosecute me for word crimes, if that day ever arrives. Until then, I just think of myself as being on stand-by, just as are most--if not all--Americans, whether they realize it or not.

You may wonder how words can amount to a terrorist act in the land of the free and home of the outspoken. It is not widely known, but Congress recently passed legislation called the Animal Enterprise Terrorism Act (AETA), which can be used to prosecute civil disobedience and speech as "domestic terrorism" when an animal-related business loses profits and property. The Act also protects corporations that pollute and destroy the environment.

You may ask, what does this have to do with me because I'm no nature fan or animal lover? Well, it could eventually have very much to do with you because the AETA"a natural child of the Patriot Act"is likely to be the first of many assaults on the social justice movement in favor of corporations and other moneyed interests. If you think you may want to use your free speech someday to criticize something, anything, then you had better be very concerned...

What are the parameters of the Animal Enterprise Terrorism Act and who could be tangled in its web, slapped with prison time and branded a terrorist? Could Oprah Winfrey, and her former vegetarian guest, Howard Lyman, be prosecuted as terrorists if they were to repeat anti-beef comments made to Winfrey's 15 million viewers in 1996?

It is indeed possible because the AETA is overbroad, vague and subject to the whims of law enforcement, as evidenced last year when six young, New Jersey website operators became the first individuals convicted on "animal enterprise terrorism" charges. The young people were part of the Stop Huntington Cruelty campaign, which targeted the Huntington Life Sciences animal research labs. The website operators did nothing more than assert their First Amendment rights: they posted videotape of tortured dogs inside HLS and reported the legal and illegal handiwork of activists, which eventually caused the corporation to lose profits and to be dropped from the New York Stock Exchange. The FBI were unable to catch the underground activists, so they targeted the website operators, who are serving up to six years in prison for their speech.


In 1996, Oprah Winfrey invited ex-cattle rancher Howard Lyman to talk about Mad Cow disease on her television show. Lyman knew first-hand how cows"even diseased ones"were fed to other cows and how their diets were supplemented with ground-up dogs, cats and road kill. He explained the meat production process, and Winfrey offered that she would never eat another burger. The audience cheered. On the following day, cattle futures plummeted, and the financial disaster was labeled the "Oprah Crash."

If Winfrey and Lyman were to make these comments today, and viewers hit the streets, embarking upon civil disobedience, vandalism, even breaking into factory farms and rescuing frightened death row cows from slaughter, could the pair be held liable as AETA conspirators? It is entirely possible.

But nothing this extreme needs to occur because the penalty section of the AETA explicitly states that a person can violate the law and go to prison even if there is no property damage, no loss of profits, no fear to any persons, and no injuries.

Just as the AETA chills speech, it has disturbing ramifications for those who commit slightly illegal misdeeds. The Act can transform misdemeanors into federal crimes, and it can turn ordinary Americans"who, for example, post illegal signs or engage in graffiti" into domestic terrorists...

counterpunch.org

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Glad to be of service Posted by: rwa
"War on Terror"
Posted by: fifthworld on Jan 27, 2007 8:46 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Of course, the whole thing has been a sham, foisted on gullible consumers. There's no war on terror, just like there's no war on drugs, and never was a war on poverty. Big Orwellian smokescreens for Wall Street's and CIA's wars on the world,

BUT - I would say this: lack of imagination is terrorism. Denial is terrorism, and dualism is terrorism. Most of American culture is "terrorism". Now let's leave the word alone, and impeach the terrorists.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The Overblown Terror Threat and Islamophobia
Posted by: rwa on Jan 27, 2007 8:53 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I recently had an opportunity to interview Professor John Mueller, the author of bestselling book Overblown: How Politicians and the Terrorism Industry Inflate National Security Threats, and Why We Believe Them. Professor Mueller is a national security expert. He holds the Woody Hayes Chair of National Security Studies at the Mershon Center.

In that interview arranged by SomaliLink Journal, Professor Mueller reiterated the premise of his book that America is frightened senseless…and that there are some "well-meaning" special interest groups "who grossly exaggerated the threat of terrorism" and as a result created "terrorism industry" that in due course became an economic abyss.

The national treasury is being drained as the US tries to build a bulwark against a mirage of fear and dashes to every corner of the world where "the al-Qaeda flag is waved."

"If there were any sleeper cells or al-Qaeda operatives who are as determined, as inventive and as demonically competent as assumed, why have they not done it yet, especially when carrying a terrorist act does not require flying planes into buildings? Could it be because they are not yet here? If not, they must not been trying hard enough or perhaps they are far less dedicated, diabolical, and competent than we are being told." said Professor Mueller. "Apparently, there are no terrorists under the bed or hiding in mosques – the very lamppost that they should be avoiding in the first place" he added.

And while Professor Mueller acknowledged the need and the importance of enhancing the security of the United States, he repeatedly pointed out the sheer absurdity that justifies the post 9/11 fear-driven policies and initiatives. He said the FBI embraces a spooky line of reasoning that he refers to as "I-think-therefore-they-are." He quoted the FBI Director Robert Mueller who said "…the greatest threat is from al-Qaeda cells in the US that we have not yet identified," who substantiates his claim by repeating "his alarmist mantra" and telling the public "I remain very concerned about what we are not seeing."

According to Professor Mueller, it is this kind of mindset combined with the rhetoric of fear-mongering politicians whose aim often is to frighten voters to their side; lazy journalism and the media's desire to sensationalize the news; and those in the security business who are motivated to seize this golden opportunity to push their services and maximize their profits that perpetuate the terrorism industry, keep Muslims demonized, and the anti-terrorism laws irrationally rigid.

Even a well-meaning innocent person could be held as an "enemy combatant."

"When a judge raised a hypothetical question on who might be detained as an enemy combatant and asked 'what about an old lady in Switzerland who donates money to an orphanage in Afghanistan who, unbeknown to her, finances al-Qaeda? Could she be detained as an enemy combatant?' The answer provided by the Justice Department representative was simply 'Yes.'"

The rationale of course is that "we live in age of terror" – a notion that Professor Mueller outright rejects as "hyperbolic."

full article:
anti-war.com

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Spam-a-lot, Right Wing Alliance? Posted by: thoughtcriminal
SeniorJudgement
Posted by: JonA on Jan 27, 2007 9:16 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Now that we know that Chenny (transcripts from Libby trial) was the one that voiced the Ms Plame exposure, will we see justice done and Chenny run out on a rail? I think not..... The Boy Bush and his cohearts are all lies and deceits.... What an injustice to our Country..... with men like this at the helm. It is all about oil...... freedom hell, we are loosing that right here in our own Country. Our youth are giving their lives for the profit of the four major oil companies that have already divided Iraq up for their control. Yes, Bush/Chenny gave this to them .... It's all greed and money.
Bush doesn't give a damn about our Country, the youth that are giving their lives for this war built on lies, the reason our Country is in bankrupcy! Just a thought.... the next time you vote for a president, please don't put a spoiled adolesent in office......

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Thanks Anneli Rufus for highlighting 'imagination' as a terror tool
Posted by: eddie torres on Jan 27, 2007 12:46 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Imagination is the crossroads between problem-solving and mental distraction.

And this kind of talk makes me want to read a book about... Judith Regan... having sex... with Jenna Jameson... in front of OJ Simpson... one week before the terrrists... blow up... Montana.

How to solve the terrrist problem? Kill Madison Avenue - you'll all be better off.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Yawn…What a Crock
Posted by: Hal on Jan 27, 2007 3:38 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
“faceless furtive phantom”?

There’s no “phantom” behind ersatz “war on terror”.

Aside the fact this kind of writing isn’t worthy of a comic strip; it has less than zero to do with the issue. An oligarch DC puppet employs America as – by definition of terrorism – the biggest blood money terror state on the planet. Wholesale killing and destruction in the name of phony “democracy” since 911 would have made Stalin crack a smile.

Put another way, war OF terror trumped up out of 911 cover-up is as real as this article is false.

And as demonstrated by this twaddle…when it comes to being a petty strawman for the faux left, Alternet seems intent on being second only to Huffington Post.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Who's not a terrorist?
Posted by: jmonday on Jan 27, 2007 6:07 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As best as I can determine absence of profit motive marks terrorist organizations from good ol' multinationals. The Neocons, led by Bush, are not terrorists as their terror is waged on behalf of corporations. It is their freedom Bush speaks so glowingly of, not ours. People are a source of great wealth to whoever owns them and corporate america cannot lose the fight for their souls to a god they don't own. We are in deep trouble as the Neocons have a supreme court in place that has joined them in discarding the constitution. Until we seize control of America from them, there is no way to stop this slide into facism.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Public Notice of Treason
Posted by: mite on Jan 28, 2007 11:43 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"in leving war against them [the states and "We the People"] or, in adhering to their enemies [federal reserve-internal revenue] giving them aid and comfort." Treason, by LAW is punishable by the Death Penalty.

Thus, any violation one's Oath of Office, by those Sworn and paid to Honor the Constitution for these united states for America, is an overt act of treason against "We The People."

www.wtpconstitutionalactivism.org/form-noticetreason.htm

www.supremelaw.org/sls/31answers.htm

www.gemworld.com/US-TaxRepealed.html

www.givemeliberty.org www.freedomtofascism.com

America ask the question outside Iraq! What makes everything in the world work? Currency-Money-Or the illusion of money. Iraq is about 'Oil' and control of it. But what were the bankers response when Saddam said he was going to get Euro's for his oil instead of the 'dollar'? Well I rest my case.

We can continue to fight about; immigration, race, class, and all the issues of this world, but it comes down too who controls the money. For 93 years the U.S. is controlled by private bankers and the federal reserve note's. To enforce the collection of this nations debt to these bankers they created the Internal Reserve and the illegal act of income-tax. There is no law that requires us to pay tax on our labor. Ask why does our media-Press not cover the truth about this lie? There is a record of the 'Supreme Court' that Congress can not levy taxes against a man's labor. The 16th Amendment was not ratified by the 'states' by a 3/4th majority, thus it is not ratified.

These private banks and our U.S. government officials declared war against this republic and us. I hope you will review the web sites and educate yourselves to the truth. Then take a stand as our fore-fathers did that built this great nation.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Public Notice of Treason Posted by: Conservasaurus
Let's give the terrorists what they want...
Posted by: Carl Street on Jan 28, 2007 7:35 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Only fools believe terrorists are interested in hurting them. Actually, they are REALLY only interested in hurting our so-called leaders -- and then, only because these jerks have spent a lifetime raping other countries to make a buck.

What fool would put his A$$ on the line to protect George Bush and his creepy friends from what they so richly deserve???!

Let's give the terrorists what they REAllY want -- pack up George Bush & Company and turn them over to the terrorists to do with whatever makes them happy -- Talk about reality TV!!

I bet within a week gas would drop to 30 cents a gallon and the world would hail us as heroes!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Poor fools Posted by: openhouse
» RE: Poor fools Posted by: Carl Street
» Evil Posted by: openhouse
» RE: vil Posted by: Carl Street
» New York, New York Posted by: openhouse
The Honorable Ms. Plame
Posted by: boing007 on Jan 30, 2007 6:44 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Of course I would like to see the honorable Ms Plame vindicated, but I hope that America can learn the truth about 9-11, and to see in fact that one of the key players is on the stand, with the hope that some truth will come to be known, a crack in the wall.

What is so honorable about a CIA operative/agent? KGB? Mossad? MI5? Ad infinitum. Most of the time they are assassinating democratically elected leaders: Mossadeq, Allende, etc. Or propping up dictators throughout the globe, Hussein, House of Saud, Greece, Argentina, Somoza, Noriega, ad nauseum. Sometimes, though rarely, they come up with valuable intelligence, like no WMDs in Iraq. But their intelligence is ignored.

We live in a paranoid, dysfunctional, secretive world where everybody is suspicious of everybody else. We spy on our so-called Allies; they spy on us. Lovely. Stupid world. A waste of time, money and human lives. Take it, it's yours. You can have it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: The Honorable Ms. Plame Posted by: launcher
Islam is terrorist...
Posted by: johnny boy on Feb 1, 2007 8:44 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
These losers would still be living in caves with their caveman treatment of women

ISLAM ..what a joke! oh and JUDAISM....what another joke! Oh and that heaven and hell thing...prove it !

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]