Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
100 words for 100 days: submit your 100 word essay and get published on AlterNet
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Our Justice System Has Gone Mad

By Silja J.A. Talvi, The Nation. Posted January 26, 2007.


America's culture of locking up its citizens has gone too far -- three percent of Americans are under some form of correctional supervision, and we may finally be at the beginning of a trend toward real criminal justice reform.

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

More stories by Silja J.A. Talvi

Get AlterNet in
your mailbox!

 
Advertisement

Every year, American taxpayers fund an estimated $60 billion for our incarceration system. This system staples together a network of public and corporate-run jails, prisons, pre- and post-release centers, juvenile detention centers and boot camps. All together, these facilities hold well over two million human beings, locked away without public oversight or scrutiny.

Yet throwing money at the perceived scourge of criminality in the United States doesn't appear to have had the desired effect: Despite the staggering incarceration statistics, violent crime has actually begun to creep up over the last two years, according to the latest FBI Uniform Crime Report.

In the last several years, some signs have emerged of an increasingly organized movement of citizens, family members of the incarcerated, independent-minded judges and correctional or criminal justice experts -- who stand in firm opposition to our punitive, nonrehabilitative incarceration system.

Viewed through an optimistic lens, the United States might genuinely be at the beginning of a trend toward real criminal justice reform. Meanwhile, millions of Americans have already paid far too high a price for shortsighted penological policies. Floridian Yraida Guanipa is among them.

Guanipa spent the last ten and a half years locked in federal penitentiaries in Florida, locked away from her Miami community, her extended family and two young boys.

Her offense: She agreed to pick up a sealed package for a friend, which turned out to contain cocaine. Although Guanipa had never been arrested before -- and had never been a drug user -- she was hit with a thirteen-year "drug conspiracy" prison sentence on par with a sentence that a major drug trafficker would have received. Guanipa's good standing in the community, her lack of criminal background and the fact that she had a 1-year-old and a 2-year old had no impact on her sentence.

The story has become sadly familiar to me, particularly as I have spent the last few years corresponding with, meeting and interviewing women like Guanipa in jails and prisons across the country.

In the decade of her imprisonment, Guanipa witnessed two suicides; countless incidents of medical negligence; the brutality of prison retaliation; and the everyday reality of sexual relations between male guards and female inmates.

Guanipa became an outspoken advocate for other prisoners as a self-educated jailhouse lawyer, but most prisoners talk about retreating within themselves to try to survive the ordeal. Concern for collective well-being is difficult, if not impossible, when individual survival is on the line.

"Unfortunately, that's what prison does to us," Guanipa explains. "It takes the human feelings out of our body, and we just try to survive."

Tasteless films like Let's Go to Prison notwithstanding, what really goes on in prisons is still a mystery to most Americans, as are the immeasurable collateral consequences of incarceration on families and communities. Arrest and incarceration are woven into the fabric of American life: Today, a black man has one chance in three of ending up in prison at some point in his life, and is more likely to go to prison than to graduate from college.

According to the latest statistics from the Bureau of Justice Statistics, the US prison and jail population hit a new high of 2,193,798 men and women at the end of 2005, representing a 2.7 percent increase over the previous year. A record number of more than 200,000 women are now doing time behind bars -- an estimated 80 percent of whom are mothers. Analysis by the Women's Prison Association has shown that female incarceration has jumped 757 percent since 1977.


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: prison reform, justice reform

Silja J.A. Talvi is a senior editor at In These Times. Her work appears in the anthology, "Prison Nation" (Routledge, 2003).

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Yes, "mad" is the right word. We are not safer in a police state.
Posted by: Sojourner on Jan 26, 2007 4:01 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The underlying dynamic across the board has to do with Americans feeling unsafe. No matter that prisons do not work. No matter that the more we spend on the military, the less secure we are.

The Shrub got elected because his belligerent demeanor gave voters the impression that he would be 'strong.' Time has proved that to be nothing more than the behavior of a spoiled rich brat. But Americans still want a leader who talks tough.

Results don't seem to matter. The pattern of the prison system today duplicates what happened during Alcohol Prohibition. Voter support for incarceration also duplicates what happened then.

Until Americans learn from history, until Americans pay attention enough to respect our history, and until we take away the money that politicians get to spend on incarceration (they know voters never disapprove of building prisons) nothing will change.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

otto
Posted by: otto on Jan 26, 2007 5:24 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Another perfect example of what the author says is Jens Soering, a prisoner in Virginia serving two life terms with no hope of parole. He has written 3 great books so far, a result of religious conversion. One is on prayer ("The Prayer of the Prisoner"), one on reform that makes many of the same points this article makes ("An Expensive Way To Make Bad People Worse"), and a mixture ("The Convict Christ"). He is probably innocent but has served 20 years so far for the murder of his girl friend's parents when he was 18. He is the son of a German diplomat and Germany would be williing to take him back, but our system feels that he is too dangerous to let loose anywhere - even though he was considered a model prisoner before he started writing books. His book on centering prayer has been praised by experts of many Christian denominations.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Wrong people in jail
Posted by: albrechtkrausse on Jan 26, 2007 6:23 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Let out the drug users, tax evaders, and folks caught in a statute-of-limitation's trap and put in the corrupt politicans, war mongering zionists, the sue-happy lawyers, and usurious bankers.

In all seriousness though wouldn't America's justice system be a lot more efficient if, instead of having all these 'laws' on the books, we simply made it illegal to be a poor white, black, or a mexican? I think it would bring greater efficiency to the system and clear up a lot of the case backlog.....

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Our European Cousins
Posted by: ragmachine on Jan 26, 2007 7:28 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
On the news this morning here in Canada is a strory about a convicted pedophile in the UK that won't be going to jail. Apparently there is no room for him there as Britain is desperately short on prison space. They are considering using empty army barracks and unused ships to accomodate surplus criminals. Perhaps they should look at their justice system - if indeed, unlike the US, they actually still have one.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Our European Cousins Posted by: albrechtkrausse
» RE: Our European Cousins Posted by: Khaidea
Prison or the streets?
Posted by: Dianka on Jan 26, 2007 8:00 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
An important factor in the skyrocketing imprisonment rates is the one thing people were shamed into refusing to discuss---welfare.
Virtually nothing was done to "move people from welfare to work". Aid was simply ended, presumably poured directly into welfare...er, I mean "tax breaks" for the wealthy. Ending welfare did not end physical and mental illnesses that were so often the cause of joblessness, nor did it alter the circumstances that can leave people unable to work/unemployable.
Desperate people take desperate measures. When the social safety net began sinking, we first threw out childless recipients, then entire families. Still ill, still unskilled, still without a chance of getting a living wage job. You can't provide for even a family of two on a minimum wage job. You do what you have to do, and today, most opportunities involve outlawed activity. If you don't have children, you have a choice of taking a chance at prison or dying in the streets, so you go to prison, praying you'll at least be able to acquire a marketable skill. What choice is there?
The fact is, America would rather pay ten times as much to keep the poor in prison than to provide basic humanitarian aid.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Well of course we must have prisons....
Posted by: WitchyNy on Jan 26, 2007 8:54 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
WHAT ELSE are we going to do with all the rebelious slaves???

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Back in Virginia, locking up nonviolent offenders is what frees up the real offenders
Posted by: maxpayne on Jan 26, 2007 9:31 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Don't be surprised when judges reduce sentencing for offenders who performed aggravated assault on police officers or for that matter drunk drivers who make a mess on the highway.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Only Fools believe civil liberties are LESS important in dangerous times
Posted by: Carl Street on Jan 26, 2007 9:30 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If you were on a cruise ship and the Captain suddenly announced, "We are in danger of sinking so everyone must now take off their life jackets" you would think that Captain was at least incompetent, if not deranged.

Civil liberties are the personal life jacket that protects the individual from the awesome power of the State. History shows that State power is at its most dangerous in times of emergency. Thus, the need for civil liberties not only does NOT decline at such times; it actually increases.

Anyone who has studied the Constitution and the writings (Federalist Papers) of the individuals who wrote it, KNOWS that they designed a document to guarantee civil liberties IN TIMES OF EMERGENCY and stressed repeatedly that there was actually little need for Constitutional guarantees of civil liberties in times of peace and prosperity; however, the need to apply an objective standard of reason and restraint during the emotionally charged times of emergency was their fundamental purpose.

Consequently, those who advocate the suspension of civil liberties during "war" can hardly claim to be Americans; regardless of their national origin. Being an American is an intellectual and ethical commitment to a system of restrained governance; NOT, an ethnicity based on the location of one's birth. I suggest such individuals READ and STUDY the writings of James Madison and Thomas Jefferson; then hang their heads in shame and apologize to all REAL Americans for their vocal ignorance.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

First know the history..... AND follow the money....
Posted by: ekipnrut on Jan 26, 2007 9:31 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The following referenced article available at the SPR link is an absolute MUST read for anyone interested in the multifaceted aspect of the incarceration INDUSTRY.

SPR

Brenda V. Smith,Sexual Abuse of Women in United States Prisons: A Modern Corollary of Slavery, 33 Fordham Urb. L.J. 571 (2006). (It's a pdf file not too far down the list
There are no simplistic answers to this debacle of millions
flowing into stagnated pools of incarceration...which
can only serve to further rot and corrode the social and psychological underpinnings of society.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

It's the PROHIBITION stupid
Posted by: YinRising on Jan 26, 2007 10:00 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The PRISON INDUSTRY, is an industry just like any other in this country.

It's goal is to THRIVE, not just merely exist.

In order to thrive, it must grow and expand just like other industries.

To grow and expand, it needs more and more clients...er...I mean criminals.

The greatest weopon for creating new criminals are PROHIBITION LAWS, that Lincoln described as "going beyond the bounds of reason, in that they attemp to control a man's appetite by legislation, and make a crime out of things that are not crimes."

The author touches on the subject briefly with the cocaine trafficking story, but doesn't drive home the point that PROHIBITION, re-branded as "the War on Drugs" is what is filling our jails.

If there was no prohibition on growing coca leaf, cocaine would loose it's inflated value and the violent crime associated with it's manufacture and sale would cease, just like it did with the removal of alcohol prohibition.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: It's the PROHIBITION stupid Posted by: aussidawg
Golden State, Golden Bars
Posted by: eddie torres on Jan 26, 2007 1:17 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"California's corrections budget is a whopping $8.75 billion, yet two-thirds of prisoners still end up back in prison." The CA prisons budget could top $10 billion this year. That's a big carrot, Wall Street. It's a pirate's life, if you know where to invest.

AND California is battling in its courts over exporting surplus convicts to out-of-state private prisons. Don't you wish you bought Wackenhut shares when they were cheap? (Prisoner transfers in doubt)

AND the California prison systems' Federal receiver (Robert Sillen) makes over $500,000; six of his staff earn over $150,000. (Receiver rips prison-reform obstructions)

AND despite a 30% pay rise for prison guards over the last 5 years, California has at least 3,000 unfilled guard vacancies. And at least 6000 guards earn over $100,000 when overtime pay is included.
(Pay raise for prison guards puts budget out of balance and OT pushes guards' pay past $100,000)

AND California is battling its own counties over sentencing laws, going all the way to the Supreme Court (how much did that cost) and losing. Now the counties are threatening to release scores of inmates early to ease overcrowding. (Supreme Court strikes down California sentencing law and Prison plan vexes counties)

AND Chief Marc Klugman, in charge of the Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department's Correctional Services Division, had this to say about the large number of incarcerated individuals: "This is a concentrated form of what's in the community," he said of the county's inmate population. "We're the end result of a violent society." Well, that's good investment advice. (No easy fix for the jail system)

AND The Governator says it's all the public's fault. (Governor blames public indifference for prison ills)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Golden State, Golden Bars Posted by: MatthewSavage
Not all laws are bad
Posted by: DeeOhGee on Jan 26, 2007 1:38 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I believe drug offenses should be repealed in this country, however there ARE violent people that should be locked up, and it's not too surprising that it's a significant percentage of the population, given our jingoistic politics and violent entertainment.

It's not just an issue of "rehabilitation" and being fair, it's an issue of choosing to change the course of evolution for our species to become less violent and more thoughtful. our choices of laws and how we enforce them have to support that ideal for future Humanity.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

legal system
Posted by: pfm on Jan 26, 2007 2:56 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Many people and I think to a degree I at times fall into this category, that as a result of the OJ Simpson trial, the American justice system is seen as open to the highest bid. If you are a person of "color" God help you because in the overwhelming majority of cases the system is set up to find you guilty. Truth or innocence is of no consequence. If you are a person of “notoriety” color becomes less of an issue, though it will influence the outcome, as sports athletes, actors, actresses, public officials, prominent citizens caught in circumstances mirror those which incarcerate folks especially of “color” are for the most part given a “free-pass” by the legal system. For many the adage for justice in America is simply … money talk$ …

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: legal system Posted by: Khaidea
Americans have the finest judges money can buy
Posted by: Carl Street on Jan 26, 2007 4:03 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
And that goes double for prosecutors, district attorneys, and police officers...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Poetic Justice...
Posted by: Carl Street on Jan 26, 2007 5:06 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
1. According to the new MCA security legislation ANYONE who aids and abets terrorism, even unwittingly, is automatically designated an enemy agent and can be arrested, and held without right of habeas corpus, trial, and even tortured, etc. indefinitely.
2. ALL studies show that USA adventurism in Iraq/Afghanistan, etc. have INCREASED the threat of terrorism -- in fact, some have even gone so far as to claim our adventurism in these areas has been the best terrorist recruiting tool for terrorists imaginable.
3. Therefore, anyone who has/does advocate(s) adventurism is actually aiding and abetting terrorism -- even if unwittingly....

Well, I don't know about you, but I certainly have MY list of suspects -- starting with the White House Staff....

I bet, whiney chicken-shit draft-dodging AWOL Georgie would admit his complicity after less than 2 minutes of waterboarding.....

And, think of ALL those volunteers in both the USA and abroad who would dearly love to have Cheney and Rumsfield available for "enhanced interrogation"...

Sounds like I may have finally found a government program I can support...

Talk about poetic justice... :)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

unfortunately..the next phase has already begun...
Posted by: Annapurna1 on Jan 26, 2007 9:41 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
what we need to worry about now is keeping these ppl out of guantanamo bay.. let alone the regular prisons...

under the MCA..king george can (and most definitely will) issue a directive declaring anyone that gets caught with a spliff in their mouths to be an "unlawful enemy combatant" under the MCA.. subject to life imprisonment under torture without a trial...and no doubt other such directives will be issued until trial-by-jury no longer exists...

but at least the taxpayers wont have to foot the bill for trials and lawyers for these ppl.. or the cost of keeping them in the regular prison...and while i meant that as sarcasm..ill bet there really are more than a few repugnicans that are thinking of it strictly in those terms...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Execute Order 66
Posted by: Itabidness on Jan 27, 2007 3:52 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"Execute Order 66!" goes the scratchy voice of Palpatine over the intercom to his waiting stormtroopers, as Episode III signals the End of the Republic---

er "Execute Order-" "I mean, H.R. 6166," the number of the MCA, says G. Bush, as the Star Wars Quabalistic symbolism parallels real life, the End of the Republic comes finally to pass

And the Jedi, er Independent Commentators..., are slated to be jailed or hauled off to concentration camps in the wake of the next terrorist attack, signaled by Fox's 24 just as Lone Gunmen signaled 911, being aired six months before the actual event:

Quote from Lone Gunmen (March 2001): "The Cold War's Over, John. Without any clear enemy to stockpile against the arms market's flat. But if you were to bring down a fully-loaded 727 into the middle of New York City, you'll find a dozen ten-pot dictators all over the world, just clamoring to take responsibility! -And begging to be smart bombed."

Quote from 24:
Woman Advisor:"These things you're talking about building are concentration camps."
Security Advisor: "Detention Facilities. Security has it's price!"
Black President (presumably ref to Obama): "So does Freedom, Tom."

As 24 prophesies multy-city attacks across the nation (11 to be exact, another Numerological reference)
Chertoff, Homeland Security, is seen consulting with producers of said TV show.

Ties between Military/Industrial/Prison complex and Hollywood.

Investigate it.

No. I don't think we are on the verge of a reform in our prison system. I think we are on the verge of "Execute Order 66"

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Add to all that the "Black Budget" money...
Posted by: Ian MacLeod on Jan 27, 2007 3:32 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
... stolen through the CIA, which seems to be more than all the rest of the budget combined with no oversight WHATSOEVER, and We the People are still just a resource, taxed without representation or even benefit to us.

Ian

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

It Doesn't Make ¢ or Save $
Posted by: NoPCZone on Jan 28, 2007 9:11 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
All these 'common sense' get tough types ignore the simple math- dividing the prison population by the costs associated with it comes out to over $27,000 (US) per prisoner/year. It would be cheaper just to pay these people to sit on their arse at home.

A huge chunk of the people in the system are non-violent offenders for drug crimes, which shows what a waste the 'war on drugs' was and is (drugs won-BTW). Conservatives who always preach about market economics live in denial of the simple fact that as long as there is money to be made selling drugs the problem will always be with us. Decriminalization, combined with universally available drug treatment would destroy the economic incentive for dealing and running drugs while reducing the demand. It would also make our streets safer, cut off much of the money fueling gang activity, give addicted people a way out and cost a whole lot less.

Freed from narco duty, our police and prison system could turn it's efforts to rehabbing the violent offenders and treating those with mental problems. It doesn't make for a great sound byte on the Evening Newz, but the truth rarely does.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: It Doesn't Make ¢ or Save $ Posted by: Ian MacLeod