Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
100 words for 100 days: submit your 100 word essay and get published on AlterNet
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Minimum Wage Rises, Sky Does Not Fall

By Barbara Ehrenreich, AlterNet. Posted January 23, 2007.


A visit to Washington state, which has the highest minimum wage in the country, reveals a booming economy with none of the problems Big Business had been warning about.

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

More stories by Barbara Ehrenreich

Get AlterNet in
your mailbox!

 
Advertisement

When I flew to Seattle last week, airport security gave me trouble over the four-pound ham I was carrying. Several TSA officials gathered to consider the question of whether ham is a "gel," to which I retorted: If ham is a gel, so am I. I suggested that they biopsy it for hidden box-cutters. I offered to divide it into 21 three-ounce chunks, each appropriately stowed in a Ziploc baggie. But no deal.

So I broke down and told them I was flying into what I had been warned would be a food-free zone: Washington, with the highest minimum wage in the country ($7.63 an hour), could hardly be expected to have affordable restaurants or a functioning economy of any kind. Notable conservative economists have almost unanimously predicted that an increased minimum wage would result in wild price increases and mass unemployment, and I had a suitcase full of clippings to prove it.

I would be entering a culinary wasteland, facing fast food meals of $20 and up, and if I tried to fall back on soup kitchens, thousands of unemployed restaurant workers would be lined up ahead of me.

So imagine my surprise when I arrived, ham-less, in Seattle to find it fully functional, if not positively bustling. Restaurants were packed, and I could still get a grilled salmon sandwich for $7.95 at a cafeteria-style place overlooking the sound. My hotel was amply staffed with congenial people and - perhaps only because of the un-Seattle-like cold, no beggars approached me on the streets. Nor can you say the dire effects of a higher minimum wage just haven't had time to set in: Washington raised its minimum wage above the federal level of $5.15 an hour about a decade ago.

In fact, according to a January 9th article New York Times, Washington's economy is booming, generating 90,000 new jobs in the last year. Even business groups have stopped griping about the state's minimum wage. The article quotes a pizza store owner in the western part of the state: ''We're paying the highest wage we've ever had to pay, and our business is still up more than 11 percent over last year.''

My next stops were in California, with a minimum wage of $7.50 an hour, slated to go up to $8 next year. Again, no imported ham was required. Sidewalk taquerias flourished, as well, or so I'm told, as those celebrity sushi spots where you can pay $100 for a bite of fresh chum.

Overall, 29 states have raised their minimum wages above $5.15 an hour, and -- lo! -- the sky has not fallen. Could we have some apologies, please, from the economists who predicted a retail apocalypse?

Not that a $7 or even $8 minimum wage is utopian. My book Nickel and Dimed is often wrongly described as an account of my attempts to live on the minimum wage. Far from it; I averaged $7 an hour, which, according to the federal government, is well above the poverty level for a family of one. But I couldn't get by on that, thanks to the high rents even in trailer parks and residential motels, and I never went near pricey housing markets like San Francisco or Seattle. In the Seattle area, a "living wage" (calculated to reflect local housing and other basic costs) is $11.89 an hour for a single person and $25.35 for a family of three - more than three times the current minimum wage.

There is no moral justification for a minimum wage lower than a living wage. And given the experience of the 29 states that have raised their minimum wages, there isn't even an amoral economic justification either.

Digg!

See more stories tagged with: minimum wage, seattle, washington state

Barbara Ehrenreich is the author of 14 books, most recently "Dancing in the streets: A History of Collective Joy."

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
The real minimum?
Posted by: edith on Jan 23, 2007 12:53 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Ehrenreich confirms what people in low unemployment states already know: the "minimum" wage is simply a number over which the real starting pay begins.

If however, the economy collapses, the question then becomes whether the minimum wage would hold or would jobs be available "off the books" at lower than minimum wages? To some extent the illegal immigrant market already exists outside of the "normal" world of minimum wages and legally protected working conditions.

What does Ehrenreich think about the all too real illegal labor market which certainly undercuts a "living' if not minimum wage for millions of legal residents and citizens?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: The real minimum? Posted by: Temporary
» RE: The real minimum? Posted by: richholland
» RE: The real minimum? Posted by: MAD
» "Surdenly" does . . Posted by: MAD
» RE: The real minimum? Posted by: fork
» RE: Entry level wage Posted by: kbest
Skewed vision
Posted by: Leman on Jan 23, 2007 5:09 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Minimum Wage Rises, Sky Does Not Fall

Nice title. I wonder if you replace "Minimum Wage" with "Average Temperature" - would it still be published? The effects of price floors (or ceilings) are far more immediate (and easier to accurately prognose) than the effects of the (blown out of the proportion) global warming.

Yes, the sky is not falling. Yet. Neither is the whole Earth turning into a gigantic desert because of the global warming. Nor are Americans standing on the brink of extinction because of the lack of universal health care. Nor is our debt reduced to the status the bonds of Weimar Republic due to the trade deficit. All those things can happen. They are just not happening yet. In fact, they may never happen at all.

So, why do we discount one danger and trump up numerous others?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Skewed vision Posted by: MartianBachelor
» Hmmm... Posted by: JoshuaLudd
» Leman, let's review Posted by: Jesse
» RE: Skewed vision Posted by: Leman
» RE: Skewed vision Posted by: yellow
» RE: Skewed vision Posted by: richholland
» RE: Skewed vision Posted by: Leman
» RE: Skewed vision Posted by: Jesse
» RE: Skewed vision Posted by: yellow
» RE: Skewed vision Posted by: Leman
» RE: Skewed vision Posted by: yellow
Living Wage
Posted by: NoPCZone on Jan 23, 2007 7:46 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We need a law that sets the minimum wage based upon a Living Wage standard out of the reach of the politicians- indexed to the real cost of living.

BTW- Bush wants to change the tax policy so that health coverage can be taxed. If enacted, that policy would destroy t health insurance for millions of American working people. Don't think it DOA- the DLC types would vote for it in a skinny NY minute. Think Golden Boy Obama (among others), who voted for the Bankruptcy Bill written for and by the Financial Industry.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Living Wage Posted by: Ederlore
Risk
Posted by: Iconoclast421 on Jan 23, 2007 8:27 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Ever play Risk? (Yes, Risk, the board game!) In that game there is usually one person who gets the shaft and is always on the verge of being eliminated. Sometimes they are an annoying little turd so seeing them wiped off the board is a good thing, but other times you want them to stick around. So what do you do? Raise the minimum wage. Increase the minimum number of soldiers each player gets at the beginning of each turn. That keeps them in the game, just like the minimum wage.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Duh!
Posted by: monkeywrench on Jan 23, 2007 9:13 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Close to a century ago, Henry Ford said that he paid his workers more than the prevailing wage, not because he had a big heart, but because they then spent that money to buy other companies' goods, which would lift the whole economy.

Apparently, Mr. Ford was smarter than any of the overpaid CEOs now running major corporations. Or, until recently, our government.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» In other words... Posted by: JoshuaLudd
State Representative--30th District
Posted by: miloscia on Jan 23, 2007 9:28 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Barbara has got it right about Washington state and her principle that the min wage must be a living wage. It has hurt no businesses in Washington state. I serve has a state representative here and have introduced a bill HB1119 to raise our min wage to a living wage over the next twenty years by indexing the increases to the min wage each year to inflation plus average per capita income growth. Want to end poverty? A state living wage will do it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Duh!, part II
Posted by: monkeywrench on Jan 23, 2007 9:38 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The attitude of conservative economists, our government and our current corporate "leaders" that advocates – indeed, celebrates – low-balled wages here in the U.S., also is responsible for the tragedy that is the outsourcing of jobs to foreign countries: While people here are without means of support, decently-paid work, the money paid to workers in foreign countries constitutes resources being taken from America – so much so, that it is a significant part of our trade deficit, as well as a drag on our ecomony.

If Henry Ford, no bleeding-heart liberal by anyone's estimation, could understand the simple point that money that stays in an economy and circulates is the tide that lifts all boats, then why can't our government and business "leaders?" Or, because of selfish greed, is the correct term not "can't," but "won't" – or, "who cares?"

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Duh!, part II Posted by: badkitty
» RE: Duh!, part II Posted by: Leman
Below minimum wage
Posted by: AJN007 on Jan 23, 2007 10:20 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I would like to know why some employees (like servers in Texas, where I live) can be paid 1/2 of the Federal minimum wage.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Below minimum wage Posted by: mr. joshua
» RE: Below minimum wage Posted by: willymack
» RE: Below minimum wage Posted by: Madam Hatter
A minor factual error
Posted by: mr. joshua on Jan 23, 2007 10:37 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Really, it makes no difference with regard to the thrust of the article, but...

Washington, with the highest minimum wage in the country ($7.63 an hour)

...Oregon's minimum wage (as of 1/1/07) is $7.80/hour. I don't think our economy is booming as much as Washington's, though.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: A minor factual error Posted by: yellow
Minimum Living Wage
Posted by: vkobaya on Jan 23, 2007 11:34 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Australia's law requires a minimum living wage and several years ago, was $12 an hour. Haven't yet heard that Australia has slipped into the 3rd world.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Minimum Living Wage Posted by: richholland
starving the cow....
Posted by: zooeyhall on Jan 23, 2007 12:15 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Look here, all you Chamber of Commerce hacks and flacks out there, I'm going to give you quick lesson in basic biology. I'm a former dairy farmer and if I would have starved my cows, they wouldn't have given any milk---no matter how much I bragged about the $$$ I was saving on feed I would have still ended up in the red with my farm operation.

How do you expect people to buy your appliances, widgets, or what have you if they ain't got no money? Just so you CEOs can brag about increased quarterly earnings, you are burning down your house to stay warm.

The COC is one of the worst offenders in my opinion, with regards to the alarmist propaganda (actually veiled threats) whenever the question of an increase in the minimum wage is raised. I don't know about how it is where others live, but in my state (Nebraska) the COC has the entire goverment in it's pocket--from the Governor on downwards.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

THE INTERNATIONAL JEW by Henry Ford (in four volumes!)
Posted by: Aufklaerung_Baboon on Jan 23, 2007 8:30 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Don't know is many would consider Ford that much smarter, especially considering his antisemitic 'Jewish episode' in the 1920s, his being mentioned in MEIN KAMPF, and his award from the Third Reich that he never repudiated.

He ws, in fact, fanatically opposed to unionization of any sort, considering that a 'communistic Jewish conspiracy.' So, he wasn't that progressive with organized labor but was much more reasonable on wages, as you say.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

French Example
Posted by: jrodenbeck on Jan 24, 2007 9:08 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Even in such enlightened states as Washington and California, the US minimum wage, like the US enthusiasm for capital punishment, is an outrage and a disgrace. American working people on the minimum wage earn less per hour than inmates in European prisons.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: French Example Posted by: Leman
» RE: French Example Posted by: yellow
A sense of entitlement for the self annoited...as usual
Posted by: ekipnrut on Jan 25, 2007 3:29 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The extent to which individuals think themselves to have
an absolute unqualified entitlement right to their salary or
wage is inversely proportional to the amount of actual
work they produce.(including creative contributions)
You have essentially feckless, worthless mediocrities who
bring in 150...200...300k/yr. and who regard minimum
wage workers as people who have the privilege to toil at
that rate.
Some of the posters advanced arguments amounting
to the observation that an economy operated so as to dep-
rive vast segments of its consumer base with disposable in-
come...whether by NAFTA fallout or keeping the minimum
wage low.....is an economy that will flounder in over exten-
ded consumer credit and general instability.
Are YOU being paid 200-300-500/hr. as a consultant to
make this apparently valid observation...as were the
MBAs and mavens of Wall Street and academia who
produced the 2007 American economy?
BTW things play out a little differently in the racially
homogeneous nations of Europe because I think the
inhabitants of those countries are potentially subject to
neither tolerate nor expect their fellow countrymen
to tolerate that which is 'accepted' thus far here in USA.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]