Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

Be Your Own King

By Sean Gonsalves, AlterNet. Posted January 15, 2007.


Behind all the Kumbaya-ism in this federal holiday is a prophetic preacher who talked not just about race, but about war and poverty.
01152007story
01152007Story

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

In Special Coverage

Belief:
Is Blind Faith in God and the Bible a Modern Invention?
Devilstower

Corporate Accountability and WorkPlace:
What Can the Morass of the 1970s Tell Us About the Current Economic Crisis?
Alejandro Reuss

DrugReporter:
Lies About Marijuana Drive People to a Much More Harmful Drug -- Booze
Steve Fox

Environment:
Why Max Baucus' 'No' Vote on the Climate Bill May Really Help Its Passage
Jeff Mcmahon

Food:
Soda Helps Make Americans Unhealthy and Fat -- Will Soda Tax Prevail Despite Pushback by Beverage Industry?
Christine Spolar, Joseph Eaton

Health and Wellness:
Does the House Bill's Public Option Kill Off the Senate's?
Booman

Immigration:
Recent Democratic Victories May Grease the Wheels for Immigration Reform in Congress
Marcelo Balive

Media and Technology:
Focusing on Fort Hood Killer's Beliefs Is an Easy Out to Avoid the Deeper Reasons for the Massacre
Mark Ames

Movie Mix:
The Yes Men: Pranksters Out to Fix the World
Mark Engler

Politics:
What Obama Is Up Against in His Own Branch of Government
Russ Baker

Reproductive Justice and Gender:
"Precious" Star Claims the Spotlight
Emily Wilson

Rights and Liberties:
"Women Are Being Killed All Over the World": One Reporter's Fight Against So-Called "Honor Killings"
Robert S. Eshelman

Sex and Relationships:
9 Silly Things People Say When They Hear You Don't Want Kids (And Ways to Counter Them)
Liz Langley

Take Action:
G-20 Meetings: Nothing Much Happened in the Suites, and There Was Too Much Punch in the Streets
Laura Flanders

Water:
Radioactive Wastewater in New York Raises More Concerns About Oil Drilling
Abrahm Lustgarten

World:
Egyptian Marine: Soldiers Often 'Racialize' the Enemy to Cope With Stress
Aaron Glantz

More stories by Sean Gonsalves

Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

"We cannot remain silent as our nation engages in one of history's most cruel and senseless wars. During these days of human travail we must encourage creative dissenters. We need them because the thunder of their fearless voices will be the only sound stronger than the blasts of bombs and the clamor of war hysteria." - Rev. Martin Luther King Jr.

Martin Luther King Jr. Day: A paid federal feel-good holiday in which America congratulates itself on how "far" we've come since the good ol' days of unchallenged white supremacy, traditionally celebrated with "Keep the Dream Alive" exhortations and Negro spirituals.

Though King's dream speech is recognized as a watershed moment in the history of U.S. race relations, the post-King era, in which my generation (and today's youngins) came of age, has made its own unwitting contributions: hip hop and 9/11 political rage, which is inextricably linked to the xenophobia swirling around the "illegal immigrant debate."

Hip hop has integrated the cultural landscape that today's youth roam. And 9/11 made Arabs and Muslims America's new niggers -- the target of blanket stereotypes, hypocritical moral scrutiny, and even open attack.

Behind all the Kumbaya-ism is the relevant King -- the prophetic preacher who talked about, not just race, but war and poverty.

Yes, it's true that King apparently pulled a Jayson Blair on a college paper. He wasn't always faithful to his wife and because of his rough, stubbly facial hair, he used shaving lotion that stank so bad, he had to douse himself in Aramis aftershave to make himself smell like a King again.

And have you seen that famous picture of King, taken just moments after he was shot in the neck on the balcony of the Lorraine Motel? Two of his aides are kneeling next to his limp body, pointing in the direction of where they thought the shot had been fired.

If that picture had been taken just a few seconds earlier, it would have captured King with a cigarette in his hand. One of King's aides removed the cigarette before it could be photographed.

While haters point to these things as proof that King is unworthy of adulation, it had the opposite effect on me, similar to my reaction when I discovered Thomas Jefferson owned and fathered slaves. I was inspired because King (and Jefferson) were no longer mythical gods but flawed human beings who achieved greatness. That means ordinary people like me could do extraordinary things, despite fundamental flaws.

One King question I do share with Reagan-Bush admirers, though -- why did Ronald Reagan sign the bill that made King's birthday a federal holiday?

The great African-American preacher Charles "the Harvard Whooper" Adams raised the question during a 1998 sermon at the celebrated Riverside Church.

As Michael Eric Dyson quotes Adams in his very relevant King biography, "I May Not Get There With You: The True Martin Luther King, Jr.," the holiday bill was passed by essentially the same Congress, "and signed by the same President, that had refused to pass a new civil rights bill in the 1980s."

These lawmakers are the same folks, Adams went on to say, that "refused to demand the immediate release of Nelson Mandela; ... devastated the Civil Rights Commission; amputated the legs and arms of the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission; cut off necessary support systems for the poor ... polluted the air, destroyed jobs; (and) carried on an illegal war in Nicaragua."

"Now why did Ronald Reagan sign that bill? Could it be that Mr. Reagan understood that the ease-ee-est way to get rid of Martin Luther King Jr. is to worship him? To honor him with a holiday that he never would have wanted -- to celebrate his birth and his death, without committing ourselves to his vision and his love. It is easier to praise a dead hero than to recognize and follow a living prophet."

And here's the kicker: "the best way to dismiss any challenge is to exalt and adore the empirical source through which the challenge has come."

Amen, Rev'run Adams. Forget King worship. Be your own King and let them hear the thunder of your fearless voice.

Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: mlk, martin luther king jr.

Sean Gonsalves is a Cape Cod Times staff reporter and a syndicated columnist.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Whant it means to be an American has changed.
Posted by: Ian MacLeod on Jan 15, 2007 1:50 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"Most civilization is based on cowardice. It's so easy to civilize by teaching cowardice. You water down the standards that would lead to bravery. You restrain the will. You regulate the appetites. You fence in the horizins. You make a law for every movement. You deny the existence of chaos. You teach even the children to breathe slowly. You tame." Frank Herbert

It was once not just a right, it was a sacred duty to criticize the government, to ferret out corruption, to protest and dispute. Now, those things can get you labeled an enemy combattant and "disappeared" if you're effective at it. John Kaminski said, "Our creature comforts have made silent cowards of us all." He was right. Better to keep your SUV and keep paying your mortgage than chance losing it by gaining the attention of the corrupt, lying media and the corrupt, murdering government.

Ian

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Please pardon the spelling
Posted by: Ian MacLeod on Jan 15, 2007 1:59 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I have to type lying down, and often have to wrestle with cats who want attention. Usually, they land or lie on the arm that's in use.

Ian

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Pursuing MLK's dream
Posted by: Moonray on Jan 15, 2007 2:22 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As we pause to remember what MLK accomplished, maybe it's even more important to reflect on what progressives haven't been able to accomplish in the decades since the '60s.

If anything, the U.S. government is more reactionary than it was forty years ago and today pursues unnecessary (or at least very misguided) wars in Iraq, Afghanistan and now Somalia just as eagerly as it waged war in Vietnam. (Oddly, the U.S. launches attacks on some terrorism-linked nations while tolerating and even supporting others, such as Saudi Arabia and Pakistan.)

MLK and his fellow protesters helped get landmark civil rights bills passed, but they never seriously threatened the corporate establishment. The U.S. war in Vietnam continued long after most of the protests died out, and ended only when Nixon and Ford finally withdrew troops.

Looking back over several decades, it's increasingly obvious that progressives can't succeed unless they change our -- and probably our Constitution -- to:

-- Minimize or eliminate private money from elections.
-- Reduce the power of the president to wage war without oversight, even for short periods.
-- Sharply reduce the influence of lobbyists.
-- Pass laws to dismantle the cozy relationship between the Pentagon and defense contractors and require the government to cooperate with the U.N and other global entities.

Can it be done? Probably not. A more likely scenario involves increasing confrontation between the U.S. and other nations and groups, eventual nuclear terrorism and wider nuclear war, and global calamity. But MLK would want us to try, and that's all we can do.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Pursuing MLK's dream Posted by: ALANHESTER
Who Is MLK?
Posted by: edith on Jan 15, 2007 2:56 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Unfortunately, most young people I've spoken to from a variety of ethnic and economic groups in the past years, have an image of King that is literally one dimension: a "nice" guy who made a speech about equality. These facts are generally unknown by young people today: The outcast status of King in both the white and black communities, the creative tension of the King-Malcom X differences, the general suspicion by King of Government, the odd role of the Kennedys in their monitoring of King and their fear of calling off Hoover's wiretaps of King. These facts will die off with the baby boomer generation in the next decade. The growing illiteracy of the public insures that any in-depth studies of King continuing significance will be restricted to academic scholars whose work is of little or no interest to the consumption obsessed youth of today and it appears, the future.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

doing something
Posted by: wawa on Jan 15, 2007 3:42 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
“Any nation that year after year continues to raise the Defense budget while cutting social programs to the neediest is a nation approaching spiritual death.” - Rev. MLK

King brought people of deep faith-and diverse paths together with atheists, agnostics, secularists in solidarity over the deeply spiritual values of the sacred dignity and equality of all people when he spoke out and stood up for human rights and against Vietnam.

On January 27, 2007 We the People for Peace and Justice will March on Washington DC, and rise up in Congress January 29, 2007 to demand Congress Do Something and
END THE WAR now:

http://unitedforpeace.org/



e
http://www.wearewideawake.org

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

"New Niggers." Oh, really?
Posted by: thethink on Jan 15, 2007 3:55 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Hip hop has integrated the cultural landscape that today's youth roam. And 9/11 made Arabs and Muslims America's new niggers -- the target of blanket stereotypes, hypocritical moral scrutiny, and even open attack.

Hip hop may have integrated the cultural landscape but it didn't integrate the geographical landscape. We are still segregated, despite whatever Top-10 song would have you believe that we all snap our fingers to the same beat.

As to your comments about America's "new niggers", I get your sentiment and appreciate your strong intent in showing just how much Arabs and Muslims are discriminated against. But to use the phrase "new niggers" makes about as much sense as calling homosexuals and illegal immigrants "new niggers" just because of the discrimination they face. It doesn't take stereotypes, attacks, and discrimination to make a "nigger". A lot more went into it. Until I see Arab lynching then find another phrase.

Otherwise a very good read.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: "New Niggers." Oh, really? Posted by: AdamSelene40
Another personality cult
Posted by: kepstein7777 on Jan 15, 2007 3:56 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Nice article. It's refreshing to see a more realistic assessment.

I remember in one documentary, all he did was rattle off the Battle Hymn of the Republic. He seemed like a bit of a grandstander and a drama queen. I don't get it.

What about the nameless people in the trenches who did the dirty work of getting beat up by cops and sprayed with firehoses? I think we should have a day honoring each of them because it would mean more days off of work for me.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Another personality cult Posted by: marxalot
» Callous kepstein Posted by: fifthworld
» RE: Callous kepstein Posted by: ALANHESTER
My MLK Day Advice for Parents and Educators
Posted by: gstager on Jan 15, 2007 7:35 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Thanks Sean
Posted by: fifthworld on Jan 15, 2007 8:38 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I just wish something like this would appear in the Times etc. Too many people (MOST, that is) still think of King as the "I have a dream" guy and that's all. Most school teachers don't know how (or whether?) to present him as other than merely quaint and "important" perhaps. And of course very few have heard the Riverside Church address, or what I heard on KPFA Berkeley last night, a recording of his first known sermon in 1957, when he must have been 28 I guess. Powerful. May such a forceful "Social Gospel" truth-er grace the ears of the public again.

'Preaching' to the choir here, but what the hey...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

ok---so where do we go from here?
Posted by: zooeyhall on Jan 15, 2007 9:00 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As a 12 year old in 1967, just at the age where you are beginnning to become really aware of the world, I remember well seeing King on television. Even though I lived on a farm in small-town Nebraska, there was a sense that he was really pushing for something important. My mom was an ELCA Lutheran and I can remember her telling me about the way black Americans were treated in this country and how important Martin Luther King was for the entire country.

Now flash forward 40 years later, and people around here are almost totally clueless about King. Especially the young people. I think two of the reasons are that there are no black Americans where I live (you have to go to Omaha 100 miles away), and I also blame the lazy teachers we have in our public schools around here.

But I think a BIG part of it is that civil rights was only a portion of King's Dream. The other important piece was economic justice, and man that is where you really touch the hotwire of the ruling class in this country. And that is the reason on today you basically just get a 20 second blip on the MSM showing King in civil rights marches.

We need a new Martin Luther King today to take up his unresolved and unfulfilled dream of ECONOMIC justice. Because economic justice today is, if anything, even worse then it was back in the 60's. And I am talking about all races in the U.S.

We need this, and also make it a holiday for ALL working people. Not just those fortunate enough to have a government job.

Sorry for my writing--I'm just a farmer and not too good at expressing myself.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Cult of personality, plagairism, and religion
Posted by: albrechtkrausse on Jan 15, 2007 10:33 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
have no place in public discourse or politics. I'm outraged that the only people against the beatification of Reverend Martin Luther King Jr were idiots like Jesse Helms. Where were all the good 'liberals' (in the American sense of the word) and the ACLU when Congress annoited a holiday for a baptist preacher? Where were they when this man was giving religious sermons on Federal property and in public spaces? Why do we have a holiday for a religious figure? What happened to the separation of church and state?

Despite his marital failings and documented plagiarism, MLK Jr did a lot of good in this country-- but this not does trump the Constitutional protection against state sponsored religion.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Know What King-Kennedy Knew
Posted by: mite on Jan 15, 2007 1:08 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
and why their MURDERS stopped the investigations and buried the truth about the Real Tyrannts that form our society and control our lives.

Go Too www.gemworld.com/USAvsUS & www.lawfulpath.com 'Silent Weapons for Quiet Wars' ONLY
if you can accept the truth. If you want to be enslaved and comfortable with your lives the way it is- DO NOT ENTER the web sites.

Kennedy signed Executive Order 11110 to repeal the Federal Reserve.

Research H.R. 2762, February 10th 1939, Public, No1, Chapter 2, At Section 4: the INTERNAL REVENUE CODE, FOUND on USAvsUS.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Know What King-Kennedy Knew Posted by: aonghus36
Here's an idea MLK would defintely approve of and no I'm not racist.
Posted by: maxpayne on Jan 15, 2007 2:11 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Abolish the holiday and change black history month to history of racial diversity month and move that month to January and tie his birthday to it. After all, don't you people think you're leaving out Asian Americans who get treated as foreigners back home as it is? And don't even think about calling me a racist because I know from the bottom of my heart that MLK would strongly approve of this idea.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I read somewhere there was a political reason for Reagan's signature.
Posted by: Sojourner on Jan 15, 2007 6:47 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
He had earlier refused pointedly to declare a holiday in the name of MLK and instead had made clear his total disregard for King. But King was dead, and Reagan was able to trade the holiday for something he wanted--I have forgotten now what that was.

But Gonsalves' logic is spot on. Yes, MLK got the Nobel Peace Prize, but his only public friends were do-gooders. None of the power people of his generation bothered about him. He was not a media 'darling.' His FBI file was bigger than Al Capone's. Yet his assassination was one of the greatest tragedies in our nation's history.

Do not forget that when MLK went to Chicago to support Jesse Jackson's PUSH campaign for open housing, my Chicago white relatives rioted. They might be uneducated, but they thought they knew who they were better than. Chicago had its lines dividing neighborhoods where no black person was welcome after dark. Yet only a few years before that, I felt perfectly comfortable working for the federal census in the black ghetto, day or night.

And don't forget that the day King was shot his non-violent demonstration had been disrupted by violence from those marchers who saw the Black Panthers or at least Malcolm X as the future for civil rights. King had even alienated some of his supporters by opposing the War in Vietnam and supporting the Poor People's movement.

Looking back what comes clear is that King was right. The refusal to listen to him has had dire consequences for whites as well as blacks. While the burden of poverty is disproportionately heavy for African-Americans, the typical poverty person today is a single white mother.

King's message was that we need to care about each other. America's leadership since then has cared less and less as the years go by. King's message today would not change, but he might add phrases like "We have reached the do or die moment, people. We are on the brink of following in the footsteps of all the empires of the world. We have a curse of doom hanging over our heads if we do not reject empire. Maybe there's still a chance to avoid collapse."

Maybe not.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: NEWS UPDATE Posted by: ALANHESTER
Democrat’s Great Half/White Hope
Posted by: shangrilalad on Jan 16, 2007 8:36 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Democrats, beware of media moguls bearing gifts. Current Media Darling Obama is being touted as Democrat’s Great Half/White Hope, but moments after he wins the nomination and after all other Democrats have been eliminated, our plutocratic controlled mass propaganda machine will set out to destroy him. They’ve done it before and they’ll do it again.

Anyone who thinks an African American can get elected president is fatally delusional. The average American white is one of the most rabidly racist voters in the Western World.

You can lead an idealistic donkey to a poisoned well, but you can’t make him drink.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

most powerful political tool
Posted by: puchanus on Jan 16, 2007 1:43 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
let us also remember MLK's 'power tool' that he used as political leverage....the BOYCOTT! It was extremely successful in changing the business practices, and after that, public policy. Dell computers, Wal-Mart, Dominoes pizza among other companies will change their politics if their bottom-line is hurt.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

wait--did you say hip hop???
Posted by: chinaskicharles on Jan 16, 2007 1:46 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
great article. now that's why i come to alternet to read.

but i'm not sure why you include hip hop as a great post-king era contribution to race relations. the images of hip hop culture are the most horrific images of black youth in the media today. hollywood...your nightly news...nothing comes close to the negative stereotyping found in your typical hip hop video on BET, or album cover. materialism, gun-worship, mysogeny, hopelessness, licentiousness, cruelty, violence: these are the things praised in most hip hop i hear. let's face it: in general, the current strain of hip hop panders to the lowest emotions in us all. i wouldn't confuse the worldwide success of the music genre with moving people forward together.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: wait--did you say hip hop??? Posted by: chinaskicharles
Church & State
Posted by: DeeOhGee on Jan 16, 2007 6:04 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Very interesting comments about church and state and thoughts about political activism.

Curiously, I heard on the radio in Tennessee last week a man very upset about the Democrats trying to improve house ethics because "they've just been chomping at the bit to get in there and kick the focus on the family people out of their lobbying jobs"

They want to derail something that is truly in their own best interest. They are not aware (or don't care) that huge corporations wish to remove their freedoms and increase pollution (including mail pollution, credit pollution, elecronic pollution, etc) by getting laws passed on all sorts of obscure but very important issues they aren't aware of because these smokescreens of abortion and terrorism and such are conveniently hiding the nefarious activities.

If lobbyists are kicked out of congress, people can still write letters and move their congregations to do what they believe is right. I hope this includes battling against destruction of God's Creation through deforestation and global warming as well.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement