Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

New Bill Would Help Domestic Violence Victims

By Allison Stevens, Women's eNews. Posted January 15, 2007.


A new bill being drafted by Sen. Biden would create a network of 100,000 legal volunteers to work on behalf of domestic violence victims.

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

In Special Coverage

Belief:
Is Blind Faith in God and the Bible a Modern Invention?
Devilstower

Corporate Accountability and WorkPlace:
What Can the Morass of the 1970s Tell Us About the Current Economic Crisis?
Alejandro Reuss

DrugReporter:
Lies About Marijuana Drive People to a Much More Harmful Drug -- Booze
Steve Fox

Environment:
Why Max Baucus' 'No' Vote on the Climate Bill May Really Help Its Passage
Jeff Mcmahon

Food:
Soda Helps Make Americans Unhealthy and Fat -- Will Soda Tax Prevail Despite Pushback by Beverage Industry?
Christine Spolar, Joseph Eaton

Health and Wellness:
Does the House Bill's Public Option Kill Off the Senate's?
Booman

Immigration:
Recent Democratic Victories May Grease the Wheels for Immigration Reform in Congress
Marcelo Balive

Media and Technology:
Focusing on Fort Hood Killer's Beliefs Is an Easy Out to Avoid the Deeper Reasons for the Massacre
Mark Ames

Movie Mix:
The Yes Men: Pranksters Out to Fix the World
Mark Engler

Politics:
What Obama Is Up Against in His Own Branch of Government
Russ Baker

Reproductive Justice and Gender:
"Precious" Star Claims the Spotlight
Emily Wilson

Rights and Liberties:
"Women Are Being Killed All Over the World": One Reporter's Fight Against So-Called "Honor Killings"
Robert S. Eshelman

Sex and Relationships:
9 Silly Things People Say When They Hear You Don't Want Kids (And Ways to Counter Them)
Liz Langley

Take Action:
G-20 Meetings: Nothing Much Happened in the Suites, and There Was Too Much Punch in the Streets
Laura Flanders

Water:
Radioactive Wastewater in New York Raises More Concerns About Oil Drilling
Abrahm Lustgarten

World:
Egyptian Marine: Soldiers Often 'Racialize' the Enemy to Cope With Stress
Aaron Glantz

More stories by Allison Stevens

Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

When it comes to domestic violence, Sen. Joseph Biden likes to compare the federal government to a lawnmower.

"Combating violence in the home is like cutting the grass," the Democrat from Delaware is fond of saying. "You can't just do it once."

In other words, the scourge of domestic violence can't be cured with one piece of legislation or one round of federal spending, he says. It's a persistent problem that needs to be addressed year after year, one congressional session after the next.

That is why Biden -- author of the 1994 Violence Against Women Act, which created and funded federal programs to help victims of domestic violence -- keeps thinking about new ways to reduce violence against women. And now with his party in power in the House and Senate, he is in position to find more support.

His current plan involves legal assistance.

Only 170,000 low-income domestic violence survivors have legal representation each year, less than 20 percent of at least 1 million victims who experience it annually, according to a 2005 report by the Institute for Law and Justice in Alexandria, Va., and the National Center for Victims and Crime in Washington, D.C.

Creating a Legal Network

To address this need, Biden, an attorney, has written a bill that would create an electronic network of 100,000 lawyers willing to do volunteer work on behalf of victims of domestic violence. The bill would also set up a fund to help a separate group of lawyers -- those who spend a majority of their time working on behalf of domestic violence victims -- pay back their school loans.

The median salary for a lawyer who joins a private firm is $85,000, while the average entry-level public sector salary -- such as a lawyer who works at a legal aid clinic -- is $35,000, according to Biden. Most lawyers graduate with a combined debt from undergraduate and graduate school of more than $80,000, according to the American Bar Association in Chicago.

Biden's proposal comes at a time when the amount of domestic violence in the United States is dropping, although assaults and other crimes at the hands of intimates has remained at about 10 percent of all violent crimes over the past decade.

A report released last month by the Department of Justice indicated that the rate of intimate partner violence in the United States fell by more than half between 1993 and 2004, a finding that paralleled an overall decrease in violent crime during the same period. The rate of homicides, rapes, assaults and robberies against women fell from 10 in 1,000 to 4 in 1,000, according to the report.

The report is a sign of success that the VAWA programs are working, said Allison Randall, public policy director at the National Network to End Domestic Violence in Washington, D.C.

Economists Studied Earlier Drop

In 2002, in an analysis of a decline in domestic violence during the 1990s, economists at Colgate and the University of Arkansas concluded that the availability of legal services, improvement in women's economic status and higher levels of education explained why women's risks of being battered had dropped. An aging population was also cited, because older women are significantly less vulnerable to this kind of abuse.

Economists Amy Farmer of the University of Arkansas and Jill Tiefenthaler argue that although shelters, hotlines and counseling services provide critical crisis-intervention services, they do not give women the ability to permanently leave their abusers. Legal assistance gives victims the tools -- such as protective orders, child support and public assistance -- to achieve financial independence and freedom from harm.

Under Biden's bill, lawyers who devote more than half of their full-time caseload to low-income domestic violence survivors for more than two consecutive years will get a 20 percent discount on their student loan bill, paid for by the Department of Justice. Lawyers who serve four and five years in their practice will get a 30 percent break.

"There is a wealth of untapped resources in this country, lawyers who want to volunteer," Biden says in a one-page written summary of the bill that goes on to say that law-school graduates are saddled with tremendous debt that can become unmanageable in lower-paying fields of law.

Biden is also working on legislation to combat violence against women at an international level. Called I-VAWA, for International Violence Against Women Act, the bill would, for the first time, commit the United States to ending violence against women around the globe.

The measure is expected to involve remedies in the areas of public health, the global economy, foreign law, international conflicts and humanitarian crises, according to Esta Soler, president of the Family Violence Prevention Fund in San Francisco.

She said in a statement that the bill -- based on the premise that financial independence helps protect women from domestic violence -- will include provisions to promote more equitable property rights, teach women how to build credit, improve women's access to education and job training programs, provide training and sensitization programs for judges and judicial officials, raise awareness of gender violence in the workplace, increase women's access to reproductive health services and incorporate domestic violence and sexual assault screening into HIV/AIDS programs.

Follows 2005 WHO Report

The legislation follows a 2005 study by the World Health Organization that found that domestic violence is common worldwide and its effects devastating.

The WHO report indicated that between one-fifth and three-quarters of females around the world had experienced physical or sexual violence since age 15. As a result, women are more vulnerable to exposure to HIV/AIDS and are subject to greater health risks during pregnancy, when violence often continues or escalates.

"This report reveals a global picture of the treatment of women and the statistics are appalling and egregious," Biden said last year in response to the WHO report. "In some communities, women are safer in the streets than they are in their own homes."

Biden, the chief anti-violence advocate in the Senate and a contender for his party's 2008 presidential nomination, now holds a seat in the majority party and, as a result, has greater sway in Congress. Even so, prospects are uncertain for the two bills, which he plans to introduce this spring.

Some advocates fear objections to the price tags of the two bills, especially as lawmakers are tightening the fiscal reins in response to a high federal deficit and the prospect of increased spending on the war in Iraq.

"The deficit is a problem," said a nationally recognized leader in the domestic violence advocacy community on the condition of anonymity. "The content is not the barrier. But any bill that requires new funding streams is going to have a hard time of it."

The Congressional Budget Office has not estimated the total cost of the lawyer bill, but a Biden staff member expected the loan forgiveness portion of the bill to be about $20 million in the first year. An additional $8 million would be needed to recruit volunteer lawyers, operate a referral system, launch a pilot program and roll out a national program.

The international bill to combat domestic violence could be trickier than the domestic legal services legislation because lawmakers are generally more reluctant to spend federal money on foreign programs than on domestic ones. The bill does not yet have a formal cost estimate.

Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: domestic violence

Allison Stevens is Washington bureau chief at Women's eNews.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
overkill
Posted by: edith on Jan 15, 2007 3:09 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Senator Biden's efforts certainly seem to be well meaning. But not only is domestic violence dropping, (while still significant and totally unjustified), but it has become a matter of major importance for most state and local bar associations through which many of the private attorneys referred to in the article do pro bono free work for the public. Domestic violence is best handled by well-trained police, social workers, community activists and volunteers at local levels who are not hampered by cumbersome federal regulations that often insist on a "one size fits all" set of solutions.

Moreover, the fact that most domestic violence situations do not result in the engagement of legal counsel is neither good nor bad. Intervention by friends, social workers, clergy and other non-legal support teams may be more effective than the often ineffective if well-meant intervention of the courts.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

For women only?
Posted by: kepstein7777 on Jan 15, 2007 5:10 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I didn't get a clear sense from the article whether the bill covers DV against men. But the quotes seem to suggest that Biden is focusing on women.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: For women only? Posted by: MatthewSavage
» wrong again, Matthew Posted by: MartianBachelor
» thanks for taking me seriously Posted by: MartianBachelor
» you must have me confused Posted by: goatini
» RE: For women only? Posted by: katyalynn
» RE: For women only? Posted by: goatini
Great idea
Posted by: willie.horton on Jan 15, 2007 5:42 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Victims of domestic violence do receive valuable help from volunteers and shelters, but are often on their own when legal assistance is needed to secure their financial or property rights.
As a side note, Delaware also guarantees that victims of domestic violence are eligible to obtain a concealed-carry permit, although they must spend hundreds of dollars on training & fees to obtain it. IMHO, we should waive the fees and offer them free firearms training as well.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

This looks more like a business as usual bill or am I missing something.
Posted by: maxpayne on Jan 15, 2007 6:59 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
By the way, why are rich lawyers getting a bigger discount than students? He might want to do more than apologize to students going into debts. Oh yeah, Mr. Biden, D-MBNA, who happily pushed for the BANKRUPTCY OVERHAUL bill in 2005, wants to LIE to us about protecting domestic victims !

P.S.: In 2005, I was travelling through rural DE and after the Bankruptcy Overhaul Bill passed and was signed into law, residents were outraged and even went so far as to putting up effigies of their sellout MISREPRESENTATIVES.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Legal Services Corporation
Posted by: sunnynala on Jan 15, 2007 7:02 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Perhaps Biden should look into better funding for LSC, which already represents victims of DV, male and female.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Not All Lawyers are Equal Posted by: edith
Thank you, Senator Biden!
Posted by: sheena2u on Jan 15, 2007 1:29 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Senator Biden's idea of helping lawyers who provide services to the poor, or pro-bono services to the needy, is a good idea. Senator Biden does not support the huge tax cuts to the most wealthy American citizens. So, if we would stop subsidizing the ultra-wealthy, we could easily provide needed services such as this one. We could help those who are doing good works, and most importantly we could help families in need. When we start to get our priorities right again, we can begin to restore peace and prosperity for all Americans.

Domestic violence is still a problem not only in our country, but worldwide. A program empowering people who have been hurt by domestic violence is a program that deserves our support. It could include men, also, if they have been victims of domestic violence. Although this happens rarely, it does happen too.

A program such as this could reduce poverty for many Americans. Many women who suffer from domestic violence are single mothers. It is refreshing to hear of a program that helps rather than burdens for a change. Helping abused women, or men, to be financially and emotionally independent is a step in the right direction.

Another benefit is it will help the girls and boys in these families! Being a child in a family where domestic abuse exists is traumatic and damaging. It often leads these young people to become violent adults, drug abusers, criminals, or adults with mental health issues. This is not necessarily the case, but too often it is the result. Reducing domestic violence will greatly improve the lives, and futures, of countless girls and boys! Thus, it will eventually improve the quality of life for most Americans.

The important thing about this bill is that it would empower those who do need this kind of help, and it would help reduce poverty and suffering in this world. So, I applaud Senator Biden for taking this step in the right direction!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

So... violence against women is more heinous than any other?
Posted by: H_H on Jan 15, 2007 7:27 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I guess I don't understand the reasoning by which we should all drop what we're doing, slap our hands to our cheeks and scream "NOOO!!!!" when it comes to violence against women while sort of shrugging and muttering "Feh, who cares?" when it comes to the fact that in almost every category of violent crime, men are more likely to be victims than women are.

Seriously, does it really do a disservice to women to at least acknowledge that violence against women shouldn't be viewed as being more horrible than violence against men? I thought that was the point of the whole 'equality' thing that we keep hearing so much about?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Cowardice is cowardice Posted by: Kelly
Since no one else reads the ads around here...
Posted by: MartianBachelor on Jan 16, 2007 9:39 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I couldn't help noticing the first of the ads-by-google at left was for a lawyer asking have you been falsely accused of abuse?.

This raises two issues not even mentioned in the article or any of the comments that I've seen:

1) Allegations of DV have now become a staple strategy in divorce cases. All the woman has to do is claim DV, and POOF!!, everyone starts running to her rescue and the man is screwed out of his house and children. If this isn't abuse, I don't know what is - and the system is both aiding and abetting the perpetrator in this case. More lawyers will certainly help with all this, though somehow I don't think they'll be made available to the subsequent beat-dead dads.

2) Abuse of children is a form of DV that is perpetrated primarily by women, with boys being the predominant victims. I'm guessing that pouring more lawyers on this won't help here either.

The penchant for D's to almost immediately pull a gun..foot..shoot type of maneuver is simply amazing.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

It's all BS
Posted by: gellero on Jan 16, 2007 5:02 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This is just another power grab by the Federal Government... Where does the Constitution say that the Fed is responsible for 'domestic violence'?? Doesn't anyone see this???
What's next...a Federal law against spitting in the street??

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Big Fat Feds Posted by: edith
Dear Edith above:
Posted by: gellero on Jan 17, 2007 3:52 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Edith....the posters on this board are so enthralled by the handouts to the hoi polloi by the Federal Ceasar that they have no clue about their lost rights under the constitution, the dilution of our real constitutional money, etc. etc. ad nauseaum.
THE TENTH AMENDMENT - POWERS of the STATES and PEOPLE
"The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people."
Amen....

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement