Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Does Media Reform Have a Chance in the Digital Age?

By Don Hazen, AlterNet. Posted January 11, 2007.


On the eve of the Media Reform Conference in Memphis, a new book by Jeffrey Chester documents the corporate media's behind-the-scenes efforts to transform our online media system into a powerful marketing machine. Media reformers and elected officials, please pay attention.
01102007story
01102007Story

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

More stories by Don Hazen

Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

The timing is terrific for the New Press' publication of Jeffrey Chester's new book, Digital Destiny: New Media and the Future of Democracy.

The book comes out just as a new Democratic majority in Congress is getting seated in Washington after a long absence and a large gaggle of media reformers are headed to Memphis, Tennessee, for a big gathering on January 13th and 14th. Hopefully both the Democrats and the reformers will hear Chester's very loud wake-up call about a rapidly changing digital media system that shreds consumer rights as it " uses the Internet as a personal information collection system."

My goals here are two-fold: One, provide the reader with a good sense of Chester's terrific book and what it means for our media future. And, two, challenge the media reform movement to revisit their priorities, especially their disproportionately large focus on "net neutrality."

It is becoming increasingly clear that we need to focus more attention on the content and tools of the powerful new interactive digital landscape -- a place where Chester says "brand washing" has become the new model for manipulating consumer behavior and undermining democracy -- and less attention on the delivery pipes. Here, huge media companies like Yahoo and Google are fighting that battle with us.

Making sure all citizens have access to information and the Internet is crucial, and of course we should be on the side on the content providers against the telephone and cable titans. But as has been true for decades, only scant attention and investments are being made toward building an independent media that can produce compelling content and deliver it broadly. No matter what happens with net neutrality, the same corporate media and right wing forces will be dominating our air waves, and now increasingly the Internet, while the opportunities for growing progressive media capacity essentially remain stalled.

Keeping up with Super Rapid Media Change

You would have to be living under a rock to not notice the widespread changes the digital media revolution has swept into the 21st century. There are tens of millions of bloggers. Murdoch's News Corporation and the expanding colossus Google have gobbled up mega social networking sites like My Space and YouTube, with millions of daily users, for billions of dollars. And, as the Internet becomes increasingly dominant, the "old" media forms -- network TV, newspapers, and terrestrial radio -- are feeling the vise of their shrinking audiences and advertising dollars.

So Chester's book is a helpful aid for keeping up with the rapidly changing technology world. But to really stay up-to-speed, you might also need a bunch of RSS feeds, social network updates; hourly checks of Technorati top blogs; Google alerts for breaking headlines; an instant messenger that logs into AOL, Yahoo, GoogleTalk and MSN simultaneously; and some widgets for your friends' Web sites to spread the word about what you think is important. And, of course, you will need a Crackberry so you don't miss any of it while you're driving to work in the morning. And I'm only half kidding. Technological change in our media world is happening at breakneck speed, and Congress, media reformers and aging baby boomers are all having a tough time keeping up.

What's Happening Below the Radar

The essential message of Chester's book is this: While we may know that new social networking sites are attracting huge audiences, we don't have a clue as to what is operating behind closed doors. "The ad and marketing industries have been engaged in a largely behind-the-scenes role ensuring that the federal government doesn't protect our on-line privacy." As Chester warns, "We are being shadowed online by a slew of software-driven digital gumshoes working for Madison Avenue. Our movements in cyberspace are closely tracked and analyzed."

Powerful interactive video and animated images beckon us to become emotionally involved with the advertising as talking animated ad bots float across our computer screens. "We all should be alarmed about how interactive advertising is shaping the kind of programming and content available to us in the future," Chester writes.

This scenario is not new. In the 1950s, Vance Packard authored the book Hidden Persuaders, showing how ad campaigns are designed to exploit consumer vulnerabilities. Fifty years later, Chester is on the same track: The efforts, motivations and secrecy of advertisers haven't changed -- only their venues have.

After infiltrating the corporate media world by studying trade journals and reports and attending conferences below-the-radar, Chester has learned many of the tricks of the new electronic trade. This knowledge is especially disconcerting when faced with the fact that public interest groups and progressive media makers and funders are pretty much in the dark when it comes to developing strategies for competing with the "rich" media of the future.


Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: net neutrality, corporate media, new media, media reform, online media

Don Hazen is the executive editor of AlterNet.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Yawn Too
Posted by: edith on Jan 11, 2007 12:55 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
if it's not on one page double-spaced, said a friend of mine in a media lobbying association, our clients(big magazines publishers) won't read it. why are "progressive" media's advocates like Hazen writing ponderous, paragraph after paragraph exhortations to lobby about who knows what in dense, jargon-filled prose. Somewhere in the muck of this article, I surmised that aside from net neutrality(never clearly defined in recent Alternet articles in simple language) there is a problem of privacy rising from the interactive type sites like My Tube. Am I right? Do leftists instinctivley like long, ponderous prose because that's how Communist leaders in the defunct "socialist camp" used to present five year and other "plans"?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Yawn Too Posted by: willymack
more money
Posted by: rsaxto on Jan 11, 2007 3:37 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Just as it takes more money for the right to tell us to do the wrong thing, it takes more money for progressives to tell us to do the right thing. The more progressives that come to political power, the more money will be available for truth instead of lies.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

You've got to do better to keep me
Posted by: Pete123 on Jan 11, 2007 5:31 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The first commentor was gentle. If Alternet cannot do a better job of editing its columnists, it will have a hard time keeping me. I was losing interest already, and the lack of clarity in this article really put me off again. And I am a motivated reader when it comes to this topic! Credibility, people. Credibility.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Mr. Hazen does not get it, methinks.
Posted by: douglashoyt on Jan 11, 2007 6:07 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The Net is a Free For All. It is the truly open market. Why should he or anyone else try to control it except that they make money.

Money to the ruling elite, Mr. Hazen included, is power and control.

Leave the net open and inexpensive; there will be plenty of creativity and money spread around for the hard workers and innovative pioneers.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

It's a Message we should listen to
Posted by: digidest on Jan 11, 2007 9:45 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Don Hazen's message about our media future is straight on (and I'm pleased as well he reviewed my book). Progressives should embrace it. The new media broadband system is developing quickly, and will help determine much of what is politically possible for progressives to accomplish in the next few years. We need to be focused on shaping this new marketplace, securing a prominent place everywhere for diverse and progressive interactive content. At this point, public policy can't get us where we need to be. Even without network neutrality, the key platforms will be under the influence of commercialized and conglomerated media. But the Internet and broadband at least gives progressives a fighting chance to compete for attention and influence. That's why, as Hazen suggests, focusing on the marketplace is more important than the Beltway. It would be foolish for us to not take advantage of the Internet as it rapidly evolves into a more mainstream system of communications (via mobile devices, interactive television, and PC connections).

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]