Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

100-Mile Diet: Your Body Will Thank You

By Jeff Nield, The Tyee. Posted January 10, 2007.


The increasingly popular ecological approach of eating food that was grown near where you live is also very good for you.
Advertisement

It's war vegetable season. That's the way James MacKinnon saw the winter months when he and Alisa Smith set out to eat a 100-Mile Diet of local foods in 2005. MacKinnon had once worked with an organic farmer who'd been a child in Europe during the Second World War. The farmer could remember walking the railway tracks to find vegetables that might have fallen off of passing trains: turnips, onions, potatoes, maybe cabbage. Tough foods for hard times.

Is eating locally through the winter more a matter of survival than of pleasure or good health? The surprising answer is an emphatic "no." Vancouver-based registered holistic nutritionist Paula Luther is an adherent of year-round local eating for the sake of nutrition. "If we look at what's in abundance right now, we have lots of squash, carrots, things like that, which are actually beneficial at this time of year," she says. These winter foods are rich in beta-carotene, antioxidants, vitamin A -- just the sort of nutrients our bodies need to fight off colds and maintain energy levels for the season.

Heavy mileage

Luther estimates that 50 per cent of her diet is derived from local sources through the cold, wet months. "It's a bit more of a challenge because I'm vegan, so I'm not eating locally raised beef or seafood," explains Luther. Instead, Luther combines whole grains and legumes to create complete proteins. Both of these foods typically travel to B.C. from the Prairies or points more distant, though both can -- and historically have -- been cultivated on the coast. Luther hopes that the current interest in local foods will lead a local producer to realize the opportunity.

Of course, most North Americans are accustomed to walking into the grocery store and purchasing whatever foods they like without any seasonal interruptions. This is one of the biggest selling points of the industrial food system. It comes at a price, however -- a peach in the local supermarket this time of year has literally travelled from the other side of the world, where the Southern Hemisphere is enjoying midsummer. Producing and transporting the peach will consume many more calories of energy, most of them burned as fossil fuels, than the fruit itself will provide to the person who eats it. According to Andy Jones, the author of Eating Oil: Food in a Changing Climate, a typical calorie of food energy in the industrial food system will require ten calories of input energy. In an extreme example, it takes 127 calories of energy from aviation fuel alone to deliver one calorie of iceberg lettuce to the U.K. from the United States.

100-Mile Diet

At the same time, many North Americans underestimate the variety of foods that are available locally through the winter. MacKinnon and Smith, for example, topped up their larder with the following at the December farmers' market in East Vancouver: red and orange carrots; three kinds of potatoes; sunchokes, a.k.a. Jerusalem artichokes or sunroots; fennel bulbs; apples; hazelnuts; Swiss chard; various squashes; beets; parsnips; leeks; eggs; and three kinds of cheese.


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: 100-mile diet

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Even better
Posted by: LeeAnnG on Jan 10, 2007 7:14 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Buying locally grown foods is a very good idea for all of the reasons above. But for anyone who is able to do so, growing your own is an even better way to go. I live in rural West Virginia, so I have a large area in which to grow. However, I have a friend who lives in Parkersburg. Her backyard is moderately large by city standards, but she also has flowers growing, which means that her vegetable garden is maybe 15' X 15'. She grows enough vegetables, including lettuce, tomatoes, peppers, beats, turnips, and beans (along with strawberries from spring to fall) to supplement her family's diet for many months of the year.

If this seems out of the ordinary, I grew up in Allentown, PA, where most of the yards on one of the main streets were at least that big. My parents also had a garden for many years, as I did when I lived there as a young adult. My parents' vegetable bed was about the same size as my friend's, and they ate fresh vegetables all summer and had enough to freeze.

My own garden is large - about 50' X 50', but only about 3/4 of it was planted this year. I grew several kinds of fruit and all of my vegetables for the entire year except for those that can't be stored (like lettuce) and some that I just can't seem to get right (cauliflower, for one). In addition, I gave away quarts of tomatoes, brussel's sprouts, and green beans. Because I'm in a rural area, I traded for some items that didn't do well for me this year. I also get all my eggs from a neighbor, and anyone who has never had eggs from a free-ranging chicken is missing out.

I have a full time job outside the home, but I still filled my freezer (the largest upright I could find) so full I had to can my tomatoes and pumpkin. I made pickles, relish, and pickled sweet and hot peppers and dried my herbs and cayenne peppers.

My garden begins in March when I plant my potatoes and start my cold weather plants like lettuce and broccoli, and it ends in December when I pick the last of my brussels sprouts. It is a lot of work to have a garden, although the exercise is wonderful, as is the chance to get outside and enjoy the changing weather. Unless someone lives in the middle of a huge city, a house with no yard, or in an apartment, it is possible to grow a large percentage of the food needed. The benefits of doing so are incredible.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: even better Posted by: godsbedamned
» RE: even better Posted by: MatthewSavage
» RE: even better Posted by: Kitty Lady Oregon
» RE: even better Posted by: MMiddle
» RE: even better Posted by: mikewarren
Fight capitalism
Posted by: staringatthesun on Jan 10, 2007 9:19 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Who on here doesn't have a certain disdain for ever increasing corporate profit margins? Companies like Exxon and BP always selling the line that they are trying to improve their fuels for future generations...Right, we're in the second, third generation of them saying that...
If you want to fight back, local foods cut out the energy sector by not requiring intercontinental shipping or cross country shipping. By eating locally produced foods fewer intermediaries are involved, fewer capitlaists cutting a profit for unnecessary layers of beauracracy inherent in multinational corporations. Clearly we're improving thehealth of ourselves and our environment, but we're also helping the health of our local economies. By eating local foods we support local farmers, who can then pass those earnings along to local businesses.
The problem is pushing corporate farms out of the rural areas surrounding all our cities. The government subsidies that buoy this style of farming is a major obstacle we face but through increased solidarity we the people may be able to take our land back, as we have a government that doesn't seem to care so greatly about these things.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

a nit, a plug
Posted by: DaBear on Jan 10, 2007 10:02 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Sounds like a plan... but nowhere in the article is the explicit definition of the 100-mile diet. I assume it means limiting your food resources to stuff grown within 100 miles of your spot. For some reason, though I'm content with making the assumption, I have a tendency to think this is a story about running a 100 miles... oh well, my brain is screwing with me of late.

We grow (in violation of our Orwellian HOA) food stuffs year round on the porch in containers. In socal we can grow most things year round.. the "seasons" are two: rainy or damned hot. We use the local and nearby farmer's markets too. But sometimes those farmers come from more than 100 miles away. What's the importance of 100 miles? Is it just an easy-to-remember figure, is it the calculated break even point for caloric exchange?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: a nit, a plug Posted by: jwnield
A GARDEN is the most radical thing you can do.
Posted by: WitchyNy on Jan 10, 2007 10:21 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
First of all people should not be living in apartments. Unless there are huge spaces for gardens, playgrounds, and animals.
That should be a law.

All land around cities...should be a greenbelt -where only small family owned organic farms are allowed. That should be a law.

It seems so many alterneters are tied to city 'jobs'. If everyone had a basic skill..homebuilders, midwives, health care practioners, soapmakers, whatever...someway to barter and trade...we would not be so inslaved to the system.

We need to get rid of big corporations and just have small businesss.
Everyone should work by where they live. No cars. These paved roads going everywhere --are less than 100 years old. Before that there were dirt roads. Much better.

There is no 'food co-op' in the city closest to me. If alterneters and such people would all join and form food co-ops, this would be a central source of organic local food, work-networking, meetings, organizing.

People are going to have to take the risk and start living the life we need to be living to change our country and the world. Working for the system while trying to change it...seems to me to be going backwards.
And get a goat.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Top Notch Witchy! Posted by: MAD
» Funny thing is... Posted by: JoshuaLudd
» RE: Funny thing is... Posted by: MAD
» RE: Funny thing is... Posted by: JoshuaLudd
» RE: Funny thing is... Posted by: mjabele
» You may say I'm a dreamer..... Posted by: WitchyNy
» RE: You may say I'm a dreamer..... Posted by: Johnny Hempseed
» In defense of cities...! Posted by: mjabele
» Did it ever occur to you... Posted by: JoshuaLudd
» Not a non-sequitor at all. Posted by: JoshuaLudd
» RE: Not a non-sequitor at all. Posted by: JoshuaLudd
local and...
Posted by: CyberBrook on Jan 10, 2007 5:48 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It's great to eat local (pretty easy here in CA, harder in nsome otheer places) and also great to eat organic and vegetarian. All are best for personal health and environmental health.

Eco-Eating: Eating as if the Earth Matters
www.brook.com/veg

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

This is a better idea then you probably can imagine
Posted by: AdamG on Jan 10, 2007 6:26 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I think the 100 mile diet concept would probably make one of the biggest impacts in terms of lowering CO2 emissions. The biggest contributor to CO2 emissions is agriculture as a whole (50%of CO2). By eating locally, we cut out most of the energy in transportation and processing. Small farms tend to also be organic, more diverse, and less dependent on inputs of machinery and chemicals saving much energy in the process.

Bigger then the physical lowering of energy use, there is the pyschological and cultural effct which I imagine would have bigger repercussions. Instead of just going to a supermarket, you actually have to be a little more proactive in your shopping whether it's going to a farmer's market, roadside stand, getting a CSA box, etc. It's more of an interactive process which you, the consumer, are an active part of rather then just passively recieving food. This engagement, while very basic, is what is needed to "pull our fat from the fire", so to speak. Maybe I'm naive but, if more people were to do this sort of thinmg it could go on to build some critical mass, pushing society to a tipping point where things could start going somewhere for the good.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

local and...
Posted by: CyberBrook on Jan 10, 2007 5:48 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It's great to eat local (pretty easy here in CA, harder in nsome otheer places) and also great to eat organic and vegetarian. All are best for personal health and environmental health.

Eco-Eating: Eating as if the Earth Matters
www.brook.com/veg

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Well, for one thing... Posted by: JoshuaLudd
» RE: too many x factors... Posted by: hymalaia
» RE: too many x factors... Posted by: JoshuaLudd
» RE: too many x factors... Posted by: hymalaia
Joshua
Posted by: joshuawelch on Jan 10, 2007 8:37 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Although eating locally is key to sustainability, eating plant based is even more important. You'll notice that the author of this article is a vegan. I find that most health experts eat little to no animal products and the numbers are increasing dramatically as we gain more knowledge. The practice of raising animals for food is the most destructive industry in the U.S. It's extremely resource intensive and a top polluter of our air and water. A recent study shows switching from your average American diet to a plant-based diet would reduce green house gases more than switching to a hybrid vehicle. The negative effects of meat and dairy on human health are enormous. From heart disease to colon cancer, the consumption of animal products is not only killing our environment, it's killing Americans and killing our finances as well through huge health care costs. This is an open and shut case before considering the misery that most farm animals endure. Over 95% of the food-animal industry is made up of factory farms. Simply put, these places are houses of horror. All animals have feeliings, take care of thier young, avoid pain and deserve to be treated with respect. Eating other animals (yes humans are animals too) is not responsible, progressive or ethical.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: you neglect to consider a couple of things... Posted by: Fat Man at the Buffet Line
jmp3954
Posted by: jmp3954 on Jan 10, 2007 8:59 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
So I suppose if you live in Pittsburgh or Buffalo you should never eat an orange or an olive or a banana . . .

This country's Puritan streak does indeed turn up in seemingly unusual places.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: jmp3954 Posted by: WitchyNy
» RE: jmp3954 Posted by: jmp3954
» Or oranges as a treat? Posted by: y_hat
» RE: Or oranges as a treat? Posted by: jmp3954
» RE: Or oranges as a treat? Posted by: mjabele
» In other words... Posted by: JoshuaLudd
» RE: In other words... Posted by: jmp3954