Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
100 words for 100 days: submit your 100 word essay and get published on AlterNet
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Mothers' Wombs Could Provide Stem Cells Without Ethical Controversy

By Alok Jha, The Guardian. Posted January 9, 2007.


A new process for harvesting stem cells could satisfy anti-abortion campaigners because it does not require using embryos.

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

More stories by Alok Jha

Get AlterNet in
your mailbox!

 
Advertisement

Scientists have found a new source of stem cells that does not involve destroying embryos. The cells can be harvested easily from the fluid surrounding developing babies in the womb and could help overcome ethical concerns.

It has been known for decades that the placenta and the amniotic fluid in the womb contain important cells. "We asked the question: is there a possibility that within this cell population we can capture true stem cells? The answer is yes," said Anthony Atala, director of the Institute for Regenerative Medicine at Wake Forest, who led the research.

Stem cells can grow into any type of body tissue and are used to research cures for conditions such as diabetes and brain disorders, including Alzheimer's and Parkinson's disease. It is hoped that one day they may be used to grow replacement tissue that is a perfect genetic match for patients with damaged organs.

Stem cells from embryos are highly prized because they are the most adaptable. They are hard to obtain, however, because they are normally harvested from embryos left over from fertility treatments. Anti-abortion campaigners argue this leads to destruction of human life. Adults also have stem cells, but these can turn into fewer types of body tissue.

Researchers said the newly discovered amniotic fluid-derived stem (AFS) cells represent an intermediate stage between embryonic and adult stem cells. They grew AFS cells into muscle, bone, fat, blood vessel, nerve and liver cells. "Our hope is that these cells will provide a valuable resource for tissue repair and for engineered organs as well," said Prof Atala. His results are published today in the journal Nature Biotechnology.

"These cells are capable of extensive self-renewal, a defining property of stem cells," he said. "They also can be used to produce a broad range of cells that may be valuable for therapy."

Aside from ethical concerns, it is difficult to extract cells from leftover embryos, which are often of poor quality. AFS cells are readily available from samples taken for amniocentesis -- which involves testing the amniotic fluid for signs of genetic disorders -- and from the placenta. Around 1% of cells in these samples have been found to be stem cells. They grow quickly without turning into tumours, a problem for other types of stem cell.

"So far we've been successful with every cell type we've attempted to produce from these stem cells," said Prof Atala. "The AFS cells can also produce mature cells that meet tests of function, which suggests their therapeutic value."

In one test researchers grew brain cells from AFS cells and implanted them into mice suffering from a degenerative brain disease. The cells successfully repopulated the damaged parts of the brain. Viable bone cells were made the same way.

Prof Atala said 100,000 samples of AFS cells could supply perfect genetic matches to treat 99% of the US population.

Jo Brodie of Diabetes UK said the results were another development offering hope of a cure for the disease.

Last week scientists warned the search for therapies for diabetes and Alzheimer's disease would be hampered if they were not allowed to source more stem cells by creating embryos that are part animal, part human. These arise from injecting human genes into eggs from cows or rabbits. Scientists are awaiting approval for the research.

FAQ: Fluid option

What is amniotic fluid?

The liquid that envelops a developing baby -- it allows movement of the foetus while protecting it from injury. It contains a small amount of nutrients and cell material.

Is extracting the fluid safe?

Amniocentesis involves inserting a needle to extract amniotic fluid, usually to test for genetic abnormalities in the baby. It is straightforward but complications can arise if pathogens are introduced by the needle or the wound does not heal properly.

How can the cells be used?

If they prove useful the stem cells could be stored in a cell bank and cloned indefinitely for research or to provide therapies such as growing tissue that is genetically matched to damaged tissue in a patient.

Digg!

See more stories tagged with: stem cells

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
I'm cautiously optimistic.
Posted by: Annarisse on Jan 9, 2007 3:30 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The research is needed, but I can understand the ethical concerns of the old way. Provided the researchers can make it clear that this doesn't involve harming the unborn in any way. this may be an excellent compromise.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Satisfy anti-abortion campaigners?
Posted by: kepstein7777 on Jan 9, 2007 3:38 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Impossible. Complaining is their calling.

They'll jump on this one soon enough, if they haven't already.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Illogic of the Xtian Right Posted by: DeeOhGee
Oh yeah, reason will work
Posted by: LMNOP on Jan 9, 2007 4:19 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[snarky]

That's precious the way the author tries to make his case invoking reason when discussing what he (she?) thinks the evangelicals will think or say.

The beauty of the miracle of faith is that it transcends the mundane world of reason and evidence, of causality and empiricism, and leaps right to wherever you want it to be with certainty and finality. Best of all, no cognitive dissonance or pesky loose ends to deal with. And whatever bible you use, it will support whatever conclusion you need. Just have faith.

[/snarky]

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Oh yeah, reason will work Posted by: kepstein7777
» RE: Oh yeah, reason will work Posted by: poppop_schell
» RE: Oh yeah, reason will work Posted by: poppop_schell
wolfmoon13
Posted by: wolfmoon13 on Jan 9, 2007 5:27 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Ok first of all when it comes to the well being of the people we need to start thinking more about the people who have these chronic diseases and helping them get better. This is supposed to be an alternative and it isnt hurting anyone, this is the discarded substance leftover, wtf is the Bush thinking? Oh sure he can listen to his "religious folk" when it comes to this but he wont even listen to anyone when it comes to Iraq.

I cant wait for the day when Science becomes dominant.
It sure is to me, logic over religion ANYDAY AND EVERYDAY!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: wolfmoon13 Posted by: poppop_schell
» RE: wolfmoon13 Posted by: LMNOP
» RE: wolfmoon13 Posted by: poppop_schell
» RE: wolfmoon13 Posted by: bornxeyed
» Are you bright? Posted by: LMNOP
» RE: wolfmoon13 Posted by: poppop_schell
Never mind those goofy religious objections
Posted by: Moonray on Jan 9, 2007 5:36 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As a rationalist, it's offensive to me that anyone should seek to appease those who oppose embryo research because they hold the ridiculous belief that some supernatural being has inserted a "soul" -- another absurd creation of primitive tribal shamans -- into those microscopic tissues.

I'm completely fed up with those who believe ridiculous things and expect our government to enforce those beliefs on the rest of us. Enough is enough. It's time to put away Bronze Age superstition and act like responsible, rational human beings.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

No ethical concerns?
Posted by: anothername on Jan 9, 2007 5:59 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I doubt that pulling amniotic fluid is 100% fail safe. That is why it is not done on all women, just those at higher risk. That point aside, however, who will receive money from this? Will the women who donate fluid? Will they be paid for the process and product? Is fluid from younger donors better than from older donors? What would be the going rate? Will women in higher income neighborhoods receive money will meth-addicted pregnant women in the lowest-income areas receive nothing?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: No ethical concerns? Posted by: Leman
» RE: No ethical concerns? Posted by: bornxeyed
greenmeans
Posted by: greenmeans on Jan 9, 2007 6:01 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Part human/part animal embryos? hmmm....

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» you mean Republicans? Posted by: benzene
Holy Placenta!
Posted by: benzene on Jan 9, 2007 6:42 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Great. It won't be too long now before one of the wingnuts opens up a Developmental Biology book and actually reads about how an embryo develops. They'll see that first the egg travels down and implants, then starts dividing and eventually forms an animal hemisphere (so called because it's very active) and a vegetal hemisphere. And then they'll see that the vegetal hemisphere goes on to form the placenta and the animal hemisphere goes on to form the actual embryo. And next their wingnut doctrine of "life begins at conception" will come into play, and the placenta will suddenly be regarded as a holy entity unto itself. Great.
However, this research is promising. Especially the part about how the stem cells harvested from placenta, while not having as much developmental plasticity as embryonic stem cells, have a lower incidence of becoming cancerous.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I see the Xtian Nationalist poster now...
Posted by: DaBear on Jan 9, 2007 11:49 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Columns of chaste "pregnant" females marching past a cross draped with the 'Mer'kaan flag, Bechtel and big Pharma logo'd med-techs with amnio syringes (ever see the size of those things?!) all ready to do their patriotic duty to god and Kountry makin' stem cells... singing anthems like "protect our daughters from the liberal menace/choose life, choose life, choose life!"

Another poster shows the dirty liberal whore cringing in a jail cell because she had an abortion rather than choosing life and donating amniofluid for Jesus.

The anti-choice Xtian fascists will find a way to twist this heartening development into some form of perverse "justice" that will bite us all in the abdomen, or the butt, for those of us lacking a uterus...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]