Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Pelosi: What Difference Will a Woman Make?

By Gloria Feldt, Women's Media Center. Posted January 9, 2007.


If Pelosi is as smart as we think she is, she will spend less time cultivating "Blue Dog" Democrats and recognize fellow progressive women as her greatest asset.

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

More stories by Gloria Feldt

Get AlterNet in
your mailbox!

 
Advertisement

After two days of pounding Washington’s marble hallways last week while the 110th Congress was sworn in, my flat-heeled boot clad feet were killing me. That Nancy Pelosi manages to do it in Jimmy Choo heels was enough to convince me of her resolve.

When Pelosi accepted her gavel, she said she was “breaking the marble ceiling.” But what difference does it make that Pelosi has become the first woman speaker in our nation’s history? After its first 100 hours in which the House is taking up ethics reform, raising the minimum wage, lifting restrictions on funding stem cell research, lowering interest on student loans, permitting the Feds to wrestle Medicare drug prices down a few notches, and nipping subsidies for oil and gas producers -- all measures on which the new Democratic majority agrees and can even pull a few Republican votes -- will Pelosi do things differently, fulfilling her pledge of civility and partnership over partisanship?

Shortly after being sworn in to cheers from a packed gallery, Kirsten Gillibrand, new Democratic congresswoman from upstate New York’s 20th District, was, she said, “on cloud nine. I’m so aware of the historic significance of this moment and thrilled to be part of it.” Gillibrand’s victory over a long-time Republican incumbent was one of the pivotal wins that tipped the majority to the Democrats.

We were standing amid a chaotic mass of constituents waiting to get pictures taken with their member and the speaker outside the Rayburn room -- named for legendary Texan, Sam Rayburn, who presided for 17 years as speaker during the 1940s and 1950s. Washington is obsessed with the photo op because leadership is about the creation of meaning. The now ubiquitous photo of Pelosi brandishing a giant wooden gavel and smiling among her own and other members’ children and grandchildren telegraphed her message precisely: I am a woman, a liberal Democratic pro-choice feminist woman no less, and I love children. My agenda will be about the future not the past. So get off my case, all of you who want to brand me as lacking those values. I’m a mom, and I know how to run a house. I’m taking this Congress forward. (Gracious smile here.) Do come with me.

I waited among another group of family, staff, and friends for the swearing in of Gabrielle Giffords, a Democrat representing Southern Arizona’s 8th district and one of the youngest of the new congresswomen at age 36. Giffords was in constant motion, excited at the prospect of presiding over the House session from 11 pm until midnight that evening -- prime TV time for C-Span watching constituents back home. Pelosi has made a number of smart moves like this: giving new members from swing districts plum assignments -- Gillibrand and Giffords are both on the prestigious Armed Services Committee -- and substantive speaking roles to help them keep their seats in ‘08. Pelosi photo accomplished, the Gifford contingent went down to the Capitol rotunda for a private swearing in by former Governor Bruce Babbitt -- before a statue of John C. Greenway, a mining magnate whose widow Isabella become Arizona’s first congresswoman in 1933. Giffords promised to follow in Isabella’s footsteps as she thanked women who paved her way and pulled her up.


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: pelosin, congress

Gloria Feldt is the author of "The War on Choice" and "Behind Every Choice Is a Story."

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Early morning observations
Posted by: anothername on Jan 9, 2007 1:10 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The picture of Pelosi surrounded by children is typical of women being associated with children. Why cannot women stand alone as having power in their own right? Must a woman's role always be in terms of children and family?

Giffords appointment to the Armed Services Committee could be interesting in that her significant other is in the armed forces, but I don't recall her bio as having indicated service herself. Will there be a difference based on the spouse being in the armed forces versus the congress person being a veteran?

I recently attended a state's Commission on the Status of Women's meeting on its 2007 legislative priorities. Apparently the status of women in America is to be a low-income, possibly abused, bearer of children. Will having women in leadership positions stop this insanity? Women can be middle-income and ignorant of how to run a business due to never having been exposed to the concept. Women can be lower-income and not be ignorant of how to interview for or to hold a job. Giving birth to a healthy child, while important, is not improving the status of women who get fired for being pregnant or for having young children at home.

Nevertheless, Speaker Pelosi offers a new role model, one that does not have a male face, and that makes me smile.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: early morning observations Posted by: MartianBachelor
Pelosi fever is worse than I thought.
Posted by: kepstein7777 on Jan 9, 2007 4:23 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
When she's done healing the sick and freeing the slaves, do you think she could make my mother-in-law disappear?

Never heard of "Blue Dog Democrats". These days, it pretty much means "All Democrats". So since the exception has become the rule, maybe the term has become obsolete.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

yeah, Right.
Posted by: paschn on Jan 9, 2007 6:35 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
All the smarts you drones seem to anoint Pelosi with won't mean squat if she continues the US "leaders'" cowardice in the face of Israel.
Our foreign policy, although driven by the Jewish / Israeli lobby, means great financial and political gain to the Pelosi's while at the same time maiming and death for us common folk defending what is essentially a terrorist state backed by those same whores.
Ironic is it not, that we fawn over the very people responsible for framing and forcing the torture and execution of the base to the Christian religeon? Based soley on the idiotic misinterpretation of the bible by the Evangelicals?
We even go so far as to turn a blind eye to the many attacks on us by these beneficiaries of our stupidity.
They must laugh themselves to tears in the secrecy of their private rooms when they discuss the pathetic ease at which they pull the strings of the most powerful, pathetic empire this world has seen in quite some time.
A nation of sheep, led by a cartel of whores, controlled by big business. Welcome, to the REAL Evil Empire.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: yeah, Right. Posted by: aonghus36
Let's Hope.
Posted by: douglashoyt on Jan 9, 2007 6:55 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I hope women can get more social equality in this nation them the statis quo men club of the Congress.

Most women live with the equality which charactizes this American society, therefore, apprecieate the hypocracy.

Good Luck, Nancy.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

IT ALL HINGES ON WHETHER MS PELOSI KNOWS THE DIFFERENCE
Posted by: mdruss42 on Jan 9, 2007 7:04 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
BETWEEN REVOLUTION AND REFORM........I THINK THE AMERICAN ACTUALLY HAD REVOLUTION IN MIND IN THE ELECTION PAST.

WILL WE EVEN GET REFORM? HERE´S HOW A FRIEND OF MINE EXPLAINED IT.........................

Differences of opinion aside, I would clarify Reform/Revolution as best I can with the following:
Within society: Whenever a change leaves the internal mechanism untouched, we have reform; whenever the internal mechanism is changed [or attempted to be changed], we have revolution....(per thoughts of Daniel DeLeon).
In our capitalistic society, there are governing bodies: Demopublicans and Republicrats...both heads attached to the same horrific monster. When viewing one or the other, it matters not -- separately -- why they do what they do. It all feeds the same monster.
Striving to change the internal mechanism before we are consumed is what Revolution is.
Giving the monster a haircut and a shave still leaves the monster....Reform.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» NOT A DIMES WORTH OF DIFFERENCE? Posted by: poppop_schell
» RE: NOT A DIMES WORTH OF DIFFERENCE? Posted by: poppop_schell
THE RIGHT WOMAN FOR THE JOB
Posted by: VZEQICVA on Jan 9, 2007 7:18 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What a good article. Funny thing, but when a woman makes it 'big' it's safe to assume that she's more than capable. The bar is set so much higher from time time we're very young. It makes me feel good knowing that she makes Bush very nervous. At the same time she knows what she's doing. People genuinely like her and that says alot. Men like her and that's important. They don't just put up with her. She'll get the job done and we'll all be better for it. Thanks, ANNA

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Why view her differently due to her gender?
Posted by: ABetterFuture on Jan 9, 2007 8:09 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If she does a good job as a representative, great. If not, let her butt and the curb become one.

Why the gender divisive stuff is necessary is beyond me, other than some of the readership obviously get a kick out of "different".

Set the bar higher than "different genitalia". Set the bar at "better representation".

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» 'Course you're right. Posted by: ABetterFuture
» The words I chose... Posted by: ABetterFuture
» RE: The words I chose... Posted by: fork
» On the contrary... Posted by: ABetterFuture
» RE: On the contrary... Posted by: fork
» RE: The words I chose... Posted by: Leman
One word: Condoleezza
Posted by: fanny666 on Jan 9, 2007 8:58 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It makes no difference what her gender is.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

jareilly
Posted by: jareilly on Jan 9, 2007 9:31 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Get the stardust out of your eyes, Gloria. Pelosi has squelched impeachment and stated she would not withhold money from Bush's Iraq War. She lost the Hoyer/Murtha struggle which a powerful speaker would have won by threats, coercion, arm-twisting, etc.

She blabbers incessantly about bi-partisanship when she knows perfectly well that there is no bargaining with the Repubs, who impeached a sitting President over a blowjob. You can't talk to people like this and she knows it. You have to thrash them soundly to get their attention and often even that doesn't work.

And BTW - who says Pelosi is smart? The insider scoop on her is that she is shallow, doesn't really get the substance of the issues at all and has ascended to her current status because she is very good at shaking down rich folks and sharing the booty with other Dems. One reporter said that about 4 or 5 questions into an interview and you realized the woman really doesn't know much about anything.

Of course, we should be glad it's not Dennis Hastert anymore; he is considerably stupider and a hell of a lot more belligerent. Still we shouldn't expect anything out of Pelosi except what we force her and the Dems to do and that includes ending the Iraq War.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Too much hypocrisy, cap'n! We canno' take much more!
Posted by: H_H on Jan 9, 2007 9:59 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Congresswoman Mazie Hirono of Hawaii cited a growing body of research that finds most women run because other people encourage them, whereas men “think it’s their God-given right to seek office."

It's hard to find a more in-your-face example of crass, gender-based stereotyping than this

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

IT KILLS ME...
Posted by: vangogh69 on Jan 9, 2007 11:09 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It kills me how anyone assumes that just because someone is a Woman that they'll be any more progressive, anti-war, pro-labor, and pro-change than anyone else. I mean, people, Madeline Albright was in a position of power when the following highlights occured:
*Almost one million killed in Rwanda
*The US/NATO bombing of Kosovo (which quickly slipped from the headlines when the nation started talking about cum stains on blue dresses)
*An estimated three million killed in Iraq by US-imposed Sanctions
*The Waco Massacre; The first WTC attack

To say nothing of the "highlights" of Fraulein Rice today. Might I remind everyone that: Pelosi voted for the war in Afghanistan (which apprently was a vote for every US action abroad since), has done nothing to curb rising housing costs in San Fran, has not been a proponent of univeral healthcare, said nothing about the US/French-coup againt Aristide in Haiti, said nothing about the attempted coup againt Hugo Chavez in Venezuela in 2002, says nothing (TODAY) about the US-bombing in Somalia, and is a proponent of (recently declared nuclear power and said to be drawing up contingency nuke attack plans against Iran) Israel.

A woman can be a snake just as much as a man and we'd all do well to remember that in Milton's Paradise Lost, Satan was neither male nor female.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Get Real!
Posted by: smehl1506 on Jan 9, 2007 11:36 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
How sad. I would have hoped that Gloria Feldt knew a little more about the legislative process.

Nancy Pelosi can reach out to progressive women all she likes, but unless she gets the support of ALL House Democrats, she has no chance of getting any progressive legislation passed. That's why she needs to cultivate every Democratic member in the House, including the "blue-dog" Democrats, in order to accomplish anything meaningful. To ignore the moderate wing of her party when her majority is so thin would be foolhardy.

What Vince Lombardi said about football is equally true of politics: "Winning isn't everything; it's the only thing."

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Implimenting 911 Commission Recomendations-Treason
Posted by: edgar_michel on Jan 9, 2007 3:01 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Why would Nancy Pelosi include in her mandate for 2007 the implementation of the 911 Commission recommendations?

The 911 Commission Report was the most flawed report ever presented to Congress, so why does Nancy Pelosi include it on her agenda. Either she has been living under a rock for the last 6 years or she is as corrupt as the people whose job she assumes.

Since the 911 Commission Report was published, literally hundreds of experts and credible organizations have torn the report apart and exposed it as a thin veil to a cover up. Business as usual means going on ignoring horrific crimes perpetrated in the interest of moving the American people to accept policy that under any other circumstances would not be accepted. How are you going to change the direction in Iraq if you are not willing to reject the lies that led people to believe that we were under attack in the first place, the supposed justification for the invasion?

So why is Nancy Pelosi acting like the 911 Commission Report is a fine example of American technical excellence. Managers from Underwriter’s Laboratories were fired for merely questioning the methodology of the Commission and Nancy Pelosi actually wants to create legislation out of this corrupt report?

If the Democrats are really going to differentiate themselves from the Republicans, then why don't they begin by assigning accountability where it belongs rather than just pretending that all is well even though everything stinks?

I am dismayed by Pelosi’s mere suggestion that legislation could be crafted from a report that only exonerated the global corporate elite. Who is fighting for we the people in Washington?

I would suggest that Nancy Pelosi isn’t so smart in the sense of original understanding, but rather she is smart in the sense that she knows where power lies and how to play to it.

When are we going to be represented again?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Excessive Testosterone has ruined the US and the Planet
Posted by: drricklippin on Jan 9, 2007 8:16 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Of course I am pleased that Nancy Pelosi has made history by becoming our nation's first Speaker of the House. Of course their are proven biological differences between men and women. But the return of the FEMININE- capital F (in both men and women-but more likely women) may very well represent humanities last best hope!

Go Nancy! You sure are a sight for sore eyes after looking at Dennis Hastert?

Dr. Rick Lippin
"Blake"
Southampton, Pa

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

QUESTION
Posted by: Wichita on Jan 10, 2007 6:51 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What's a 'Blue Dog' Democrat and what are the
alternatives? Never heard the phrase.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Two big questions
Posted by: H_H on Jan 10, 2007 10:53 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
1. Why is there no mention of bringing-back the Fairness Doctrine for broadcasting which was dismantled under Reagan? That would basically put FOX news out of business, wouldn't it?

2. Why is there no talk of repealing the bankruptcy bill which basically serves the credit card companies and screws the poor?

Why are these high on the agenda?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Two big questions Posted by: H_H
» RE: Two big questions Posted by: pomes
What difference will Pelosi make?
Posted by: opeluboy on Jan 10, 2007 3:40 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
None. Except she has one more orifice for the Likud, AIPAC and American Zionists to enjoy while gang-banging her.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» who are you? Posted by: bambino
» RE: who are you? Posted by: pomes
Screw the bluedogs--Get Kucinich on the mic
Posted by: Deport The Minutemen on Jan 13, 2007 10:07 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Nancy voted for the Yucca Mountain nuclear bill and against the interests of the people in her own state.

Kucinich voted against it.

Members of Congress have sold out on the free trade issues.

Kucinich has alway opposed them.

As a wife and mother I would love to see a woman in the oval office but Hillary isn't on the list.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]