comments_image -

An Agenda for the Democrats' Second Hundred Hours

Who wants publicly financed elections, quality health care, and a public education system that works?
 
 
LIKE THIS ARTICLE ?
Join our mailing list:

Sign up to stay up to date on the latest headlines via email.

 
 
 
 

(Attention: Actual, specific, ideas contained below)

In 1994, the Republicans took control of both houses of Congress. Up to that point, Democrats had controlled the Senate for six years and the House for thirty-four years. And a Democrat, Bill Clinton, was still in the White House. Like a new jockey mounting a horse that had just bucked the previous rider, one might have expected the Republican leadership to be timid, hesitant, more concerned with maintaining power in the next election than using their power to achieve real change. But instead, the audacious Republicans went for the gold.

Newt Gingrich and the Republican leadership of the 104th Congress outlined a "Contract With America," a bundle of proposals that Republicans promised to introduce and pass during the first 100 days of their control of Congress. This was no shrinking violet agenda. Republicans set out to implement a bold vision that included eviscerating welfare, abolishing basic fiscal equity through tax cuts for the super-rich, privatizing social security, undermining the peacekeeping role of the United Nations and expanding the U.S. military for wanton escapades abroad. And while much of the agenda did not pass in its intended form, clearly variations on the theme have seeped into political reality today -- to the point where many of these proposals have recruited new adherents, including the new class of conservative Democrats in Congress.

Fast forward to 2006: the Democrats take back Congress. Pundits and political leaders declare the Democrats' victory a landslide. Even President Bush admitted it was a thumping. So, back on the horse of Congressional power -- in much the same position as the Republicans twelve years ago -- what goals are the Democrats trying to reach?

In the lead up to the election, Representative Nancy Pelosi -- in the Speaker role that Gingrich once held -- outlined a six-point agenda for the Democrats first 100 legislative hours in office, a period potentially stretching over several weeks. The "Six for '06" includes some very good ideas -- negotiating for Medicare prescriptions to lower drug prices, cutting student loan rates and making college tuition tax deductible, reducing dependence on foreign oil through new energy-efficient technologies.

But the agenda Democrats outlined can hardly be called bold and ambitious. Stopping the privatization of Social Security is important, but as Americans live longer and the baby boom generation reaches retirement, we need to expand Social Security to support all of us when we need it. Re-examining the strategy in Iraq is a nice first start, but what about re-examining the cowboy foreign policy used to justify pre-emptive war, whether on faulty intelligence or not? Raising the minimum wage is essential, but just as important is a plan for sensible trade the builds jobs and local economies in the U.S. and abroad -- rather than just building the bank accounts of multi-national corporations.

The "Six in '06" agenda befits the current Democratic leadership, which swept to power by running a slate of candidates who generally yielded to conservative-leaning voters rather than offering a hopeful, progressive vision. But now that they have power, Democrats should not make the same mistake. They can advance a middle-of-the-road, safe agenda that create make many enemies but doesn't create much real change, either. Or they can set forth a bold, positive agenda that fires up the Democratic base, inspires independents and -- for added measure -- actually improves the fairness and functioning of our social, political and economic world.

After the Democrats pass their initial agenda, testing the waters of newfound power, it's time to dive in and use that power to make even more profound changes to benefit the future of all Americans. I've interviewed over 165 progressive leaders and activists across the country about their ideas for our nation's future. Consider these proposals the "Six after the Six" agenda, an action plan for the Democrats second hundred hours in office:

submit to reddit

-
Email
Print
Share
LIKED THIS ARTICLE? JOIN OUR EMAIL LIST
Stay up to date with the latest AlterNet headlines via email
See more stories tagged with: democrats, pelosi
Advertisement
Most Read
Most Emailed
Most Discussed
On REDDIT
On DIGG
 
loading most read content ..
Advertisement
AlterNet Radio: What's At Stake in Wisconsin; Real "Defense" Budget Is $1 Trillion; the Right's Phony Race War

By Staff | AlterNet

 
 
Fox, Breitbart, and Ricketts Try to Bring Back D'Souza's Pseudo-Birtherism

By Steve M | No More Mister Nice Blog

 
 
Activists Speak Out Against Lack of Access to Bradley Manning

By Agence France Presse

 
 
NYPD Catches Sexual Assailant, Then Lets Him Go Free Because He Didn't Feel Like Being Questioned

By Jill F | Feministe

 
 
Gov. Scott Orders Purging of Florida’s Voter Rolls - Just in Time For Prez Election

By Adele Stan | AlterNet

 
 
Abortion Clinics Across Country Put On Alert In Wake of Georgia Clinic Arson Cases

By Robin Marty | RH Reality Check

 
 
Former GOP Congresswoman Blasts New GOP Women’s Caucus: ‘They’re Not Voting In Best Interest Of All Women’

By Josh Israel | ThinkProgress

 
 
Debbie Wasserman Schulz is Wrong on Wisconsin

By LaFeminista | DailyKos

 
 
Pro-Coal Group Pays People to Wear Its Shirts at EPA Hearing

By Heather Moyer | Sierra Club

 
 
Kids Inundate NY Governor With Concerns About Fracking

By Seth Gladstone | Food and Water Watch

 
 
 
 
 
loading ...
POWERED BY DIGG'S USERS
 
[ page served from web 2 ]