Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.
Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.
The Little (Abortion) Pill that Could
Corporate Accountability and WorkPlace:
Jim Hightower, Raising Hell
Jonathan Rowe
Democracy and Elections:
Are Feds Trying to Aid Republican Candidate's Election?
Tim Kalich
DrugReporter:
A Cultural History of the Magic Mushroom
Lux
Election 2008:
The Real Elitist: Video of McCain's Collection of Mansions Reveal He's Not Your Average Joe
Steven Greenhouse
Environment:
Republicans Have Handed Democrats a Winning Election Issue
David Morris
ForeignPolicy:
Blocking a Gazan's Path to an Education
Fidaa Abed
Health and Wellness:
The Misshapen Mind: How the Brain's Haphazard Evolution Left Us with Self-Destructive Instincts
Sasha Abramsky
Hurricane Katrina:
From the Bayou to Baghdad: Mission Not Accomplished
Amy Goodman
Immigration:
Medical Neglect in Immigrant Prisons Reveals America at Its Worst
Kyle Hussein de Beausset
Media and Technology:
What's Going on with the Media's Ballooning Coverage of Celebrity Babies?
Meredith Blake
Movie Mix:
Protest over Use of the Word 'Retard' in Stiller's 'Tropic Thunder' Misses the Target
Annabelle Gurwitch
Reproductive Justice and Gender:
Why Obama Should Pick Hillary
Lanny Davis
Rights and Liberties:
Stop the Execution: Jeff Wood Faces Death Tomorrow for a Murder He Didn't Commit
Liliana Segura
Sex and Relationships:
Catching the Wrong John: When Are the Media Going to Talk about John McCain's Infidelity?
Drew Westen
War on Iraq:
How Many More Iraqis Can You Throw Behind Bars Without Trial?
Fatih Abdulsalam
Water:
What If Your Tap Water Is Not Safe To Drink?
Elizabeth Royte
This article is reprinted from the American Prospect.
In the mid-1990s, the abortion wars were at a fever pitch over the impending approval of RU-486. Time magazine called it "The Pill that Changes Everything," The New York Times Magazine dubbed it a "little white bombshell," and anti-abortion leaders said over and over that this drug was dangerous because it would make having an abortion "as trivial as taking aspirin." Pro-choicers, for their part, were invigorated by the possibility of giving women another abortion option, one they hoped would let them largely bypass abortion clinics and the attendant protesters at the gates.
But for all the controversy about mifepristone, the active drug in RU-486, there wasn't much attention paid to the fact that many doctors were already providing abortions in pill form using a drug called methotrexate, which had been FDA-approved for years as a treatment for cancer, arthritis, and Crohn's disease. Because methotrexate was useful in many more ways than abortion, it was more loosely regulated and readily available. And because the methotrexate was approved for a variety of illnesses, it was politically impossible for anti-abortion groups to push the FDA to revoke its approval.
This article is available on The American Prospect website. © 2007 by The American Prospect, Inc.
"Nobody's trying to get that drug off the market," says Beth Jordan, medical director for the Association of Reproductive Health Professionals. "We want to see mifepristone enjoy that same place on the market. If the science is there."
That's why, even before mifepristone was FDA-approved as an abortion pill, pro-choice groups began supporting research into whether the drug can be used to treat depression, cancer, and reproductive system disorders. So far the results are encouraging. In November, one researcher attracted considerable press when she released findings that she had successfully used mifepristone to treat breast cancer in mice. The announcement gave pro-choicers hope that they were a step closer to pushing for FDA approval for a use other than abortion.
Although only about 10 percent of the 1.29 million abortions performed in the United States every year use the medication method, the battle over the drug has been particularly bitter. While a woman must obtain mifepristone at a clinic, the actual abortion happens in the privacy of her home. Currently, medication abortion is common in many countries where the procedure is illegal, because it's decidedly less risky than using a wire hanger. In fact, in the absence of a doctor, it's the safest and easiest way for a woman to perform a do-it-yourself abortion. Which is another reason why pro-choice groups would like it approved for alternate uses and see its availability increase. If abortion were ever outlawed in the United States, mifepristone would become perhaps the most important -- and the most common -- abortion option.
It took pro-choice activists 12 years to get the abortion pill -- of which mifepristone is one of two components -- approved by the FDA. Though it had been used in some European countries since the early 1980s, American abortion politics caused the drug's European makers to shy away from patenting and marketing the drug here. After a series of hang-ups, clinical trials were completed in the late 1990s and the FDA agreed to consider approval. Despite objections from anti-abortion groups and conservative congressmen, mifepristone was FDA-approved for abortions in September 2000. (More recently, the drug came under renewed scrutiny when at least four women died of a rare bacterial infection after taking the pill. The anti-abortion movement seized on the deaths to push for a ban on mifepristone. But after two more people died of the same rare bacteria, many experts questioned mifepristone's role in the deaths.)
See more stories tagged with: abortion, birth control, emergency contraception
Ann Friedman is an associate editor of The American Prospect.
Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »