Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Home of the Brave: The Psychic Toll of the Iraq War

By Jeanine Plant, AlterNet. Posted December 23, 2006.


Despite its ripped-from-the-headlines feel, Home of the Brave, the new film about Iraq war veterans who have trouble readjusting to life at home, is Hollywood all the way.
Advertisement

Violence is most profound when it is most subtle -- that is, when it creeps in quietly and unexpectedly. So it's not the spectacle of war in the opening sequence of Home of the Brave that is most disturbing. It's the violence that erupts when these same soldiers must try and readjust to ordinary life at home.

Returning home from war should be a joyous occasion. Indeed, when the National Guard soldiers in Irwin Winkler's Home of the Brave get wind that they are going home, they are exultant. The men, played by Samuel L. Jackson (Will Marsh), Curtis "50 Cent" Jackson (Jamal Aiken), and Brian Presley (Tommy Yates), alternately play touch football, joke about their future sexual exploits, and express sheer relief. Jessica Biel (Vanessa Price), the token woman in the movie, cannot wait to go home to see her son.

But not so fast. They have one last mission that will irrevocably change their lives. And it's this one mission that will haunt them upon their return home and unravel their most intimate relationships.

Even though these stories are relatively underreported, Home of the Brave has a ripped-straight-from-the-headlines feel to it, which begs to be held up to the rigors of the documentary. The screenplay, by Mark Friedman, was based on interviews with veterans. Even the actors did their homework by talking to Iraq veterans who may have been the basis for their characters.

But war is far messier than this film suggests. The last battle before their return home, for instance, becomes the defining moment of the war for these characters. While this may be useful for a movie script, it would have been more realistic to dramatize a series of haunting incidents, rather than encapsulating all of their traumatic memories into one pivotal event.

Home of the Brave is a decent and compassionate attempt to capture the psychic toll of war, and Winkler underscores this message at the end with a Machiavelli quote we might not expect from Karl Rove's hero: "Wars begin where you will, but they do not end where you please," wrote the author of The Prince.

But that is about as political as this movie gets. This movie honors the soldiers without disillusioning them -- even though a recent Zogby poll found that many soldiers are actually against the war. And the script does not dare to upset a big box-office paycheck by alienating Bill O'Reilly fans. At one point in the film, Marsh's son wears a "Buck Fush" T-shirt to school, and Marsh and his wife are summoned to the principal's office. At school, Marsh defends his son's right to freedom of expression.

Yet as he and his son walk back to the car, Marsh tells him he has no right to criticize a war he hasn't participated in, and therefore knows nothing about. As if to ensure there will be no boycotts of the movie, Marsh later concludes that his son is against the war not merely on principle, but because he's just a typical teenage boy rebelling against his father, and a war his father happened to be in.


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: hollywood, home of the brave, movie review, samuel l jackson, jessica biel, post traumatic stress dis

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Only the beginning...
Posted by: Tom Degan on Dec 23, 2006 1:23 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Interesting. As I write this there is a replay of Friday's Washington Journal on CSPAN. Brian LAmb is talking about the prposed 500 million dollar George W. Bush Presidential Library. I've got a secret: there will be no such place. Federal prosecuters will be going over the Bush papers for evidence for a long, long time.

Back on topic: One of the things we're all going to have to deal with in the decades to come will be the psychic toll this obscenity has had on the men and women coming back from it. In addition to the people who have been forever changed by catastrophic injury, we're going to be dealing with serious mental illness on the part of many of these kids. Many of them will end up in prison for the simple reason that the extreme violence of George W. Bush and the PNAC agenda have turned them into murderers. This war will be haunting America's conscience for the rest of our lives.

And so happy Christmas
We hope you have fun
The near and the dear one
The old and the young

Pray for peace.

Tom Degan
Goshen, NT
"The Rant" by Tom Degan

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Only the beginning... Posted by: symcokid
negative
Posted by: rsaxto on Dec 23, 2006 1:52 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The real tragedy of Iraq is that every death/injury/psychological injury are all in vain because none of the objectives of the war can be achieved. It is criminality without a cause for the payoff can never happen. Except that it may result in no more wars started by greed, a lesson finally learned.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: negative Posted by: douglashoyt
War Is Hell
Posted by: JonA on Dec 23, 2006 11:33 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Most do not realize that war is hell on earth.... everyone involved is changed for life.....

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

WE Never Get It-Do We
Posted by: mite on Dec 23, 2006 11:51 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
For me it has been 33 years since the patties, mountains, and rivers of Nam, Cambodia, Laos, etc, etc. Not to mention those colorful little snakes. And let us not forget the muders of innocent civilians over seas and on U.S. soil all because of a LIE. Then we have the World Wars of I & II both started over LIES and Greed.

Congress can end this War, but the Bosses are making money or should I say investing for the future. (100years)

I read something on the Internet a few Years back that pretty much broke it down. Lord knows you would not see it in the Press, or history books, it was named `War Is A Racket' writen by a U.S.M.C. Retired Major General Smedly Darlington Butler- who died on June 21, 1940. He starts it with;...war the oldest, easily the most profitable, and surely the most vicious. http://lexrex.com/enlightened/articles/warisaracket.htm

Governments or should I say Bankers take young women and men who's brains are not yet fully developed and begin a conditioning agenda that forms a killer. Let us not forget the TV, and X-Box's that clorify death-murder, while these kids are going through our school systems.When this individual returns (if ever) he is thrown to the dogs of society (bankers) who feed these dogs with nothing but guilt and shame.

www.NVO.org and www.VDPI.org wrote a standing letter to the Presidential Candidate before the 2001 elections. This letter addressed the 39 sailors of the USS Cole and other veterans about the the VA and Congress's longwithstanding policy of Rule Law and thereby breaking the promises this country made to those who served this nation.

Under existing federal law, (as of 10/2000) veterans injured in the military cannot appeal the wrongful denial of meritorious VA claims to U.S. Courts, have no right to hire attorneys even if they pay themselves.
I suggest anyone who wants to serve for these bankers; "check your contract" with your attorney before you sign on the dotted line. And remember as a soldier if required to you will fire upon citizens of this nation if ordered- that includes children, Mom Dad, Brother, Sister.
www.whatdoesitmean.com `USARNORTH' U.S. Army Announces Readiness for Total Military Takeover of America- "North American Union"
www.americanpolicy.org www.cfr.org www.spp.gov www.worldnetdaily.com

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

if this movie were really about US troops
Posted by: Ghoulman on Dec 23, 2006 12:58 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
... those troops would be sent right back to Iraq.

Which is what actually happens.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

We must ACT to END the war...NOW
Posted by: World Can't Wait on Dec 23, 2006 10:19 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...because the World Can't Wait!

The whole program of the Bush administration must be stopped. If George Bush is allowed to finish out his term, all the destruction and the whole direction he has taken society will be condoned, legitimated and made permanent. We demand Congress investigate and hold accountable the Bush Administration for criminal liability and bring articles of impeachment against the President.

Generations from now people will ask what did the people of this country do when they knew their government was committing war crimes: launching a war based on the unlawful doctrine of “preventive” war; indiscriminately using cluster bombs, depleted uranium and chemical weapons against civilians; and carrying out an illegal occupation?

What will you say when they ask why a President who decided he could order torture with impunity stayed in office?

Will your answer be that we did nothing because Congress refused to act, counseling governing from the center and working with the President and seeking unity and common ground with war criminals, religious fanatics and fascists?

Your government, on the basis of outrageous lies, is waging a murderous and utterly immoral and illegitimate war in Iraq – with Iran now in its sights.

Your government is openly torturing people. In violation of international law, with the Military Commissions Act of 2006, it has made torture legal and granted itself immunity from criminal prosecution.

Your government is creating a police state – obliterating basic constitutional protections, such as the right to habeas corpus, the right to privacy and the right to dissent.

For the war to end now, for torture to stop, to restore rights stolen, we the people must act. No one will do this for us. That which you do not resist and mobilize to stop, you will learn – or be forced – to accept.

We can and must create a political situation where the Bush regime’s whole program is repudiated, where Bush himself is driven from office and where the whole direction he has been taking society is reversed.

January 4, 2007: Demonstrate in Washington DC as Congress opens! Impeach Bush! THE WORLD CAN”T WAIT - DRIVE OUT THE BUSH REGIME!
www.worldcantwait.org

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Debunking war nothing new
Posted by: BobbyGreyFriar on Dec 23, 2006 11:44 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Stories debunking the horrors of war are nothing new. It was quite common after the First World War in Brittan according to George Orwell. What concerns me a great deal is that the issue of responsibility is being evaded by the left. There was an agent responsible for the Invasion of Iraq – it was not an act of God like a hurricane. The US Government – and ultimately the concentrations of power such a corporations that it represents – are responsible. And, by our acquiescence, each one of us is responsible. I don’t think any sane person seriously doubts the cliché that war is hell (my father was a Navy Seal in Vietnam, e.g.) and I don’t think patronizing people in this respect is defensible. Instead what might help would be some exposition on why the war happened, who are the agents responsible for it and, perhaps, some speculation on how these agents may be held criminally accountable. This understanding might well prevent such atrocities in future. If this war is not a crime against humanity -- an act of terrorism -- them I don’t believe the concept of justice has meaning.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

"Spineless"
Posted by: acme-instant on Dec 24, 2006 9:42 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I agree with the author about Hollywood depoliticization of political topics as cowardice. I haven't seen the film yet, but I've seen so many Hollywood films that attempt to remain 'objective' about a political issue while still trying to analyze the characters within said issue. Does that sound possible? It's not. The characters aren't objective about it. If one is too chickenshit as a writer to take the risk of alienating audience members, then he's not a true writer. Maybe he's greedy and wants both parties at the box office.
Writing takes courage, and only the courageous write classics.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Not just soldiers suffering...
Posted by: Aussie Kim on Dec 25, 2006 4:09 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
An Australian repoter, Paul McGeogh just came back from Iraq and has reported that there is so much NOISE and such throughout cities in Iraq that ordinary citizens are on the verge of suffering a mass version of shell-shock. With helicopters and planes and shootings and bombings all the time, people are becoming more and more traumatised.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

COMPLETE LIST OF LIBERAL WAR HEROES
Posted by: cheneybush2008 on Dec 28, 2006 9:58 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Al iGore: 6 months, as a photo journalist In Nam before Daddy had his silver spooned ass dragged home

John Kerry: 4 months, as a self-serving, medal grubbing, Band Aid wearing dork

Ted Kennedy: 0 months (did 2 years in Army in Paris, France during height of Korean War after being kicked out of school for cheating)

Little Joe Kennedy: FDR sent him on a suicide air raid when Roosevelt had had enough of Papa Joe's rants on behalf of Hitler

Bill Clinton: 0 for 0 (ran anti-U.S. protests in London, England and Moscow, New York during height of Vietnam War)

Abbie Hoffman: 0 for 0 (shot himself dead in the head shortly after Reagan was elected)

Neil Young: Canadian, unfit to serve

Hillary Clinton: French, unfit to serve

John John Kennedy Jr: 0 for 0 (became unsuccessful private test pilot for underwater landing lights off Cape Crap)

Chelsea Clinton: 0 for 0 (provided free advise to Sandy Berger on tube socks selection during top Bin Laden security scare meetings of the Clixon administration)

Al Franken: 0 for 0 (couldn't locate Hood, Knox, or the NTC on a map if it was painted by Andy Warhol)

Jane Fonda: 2 weeks, for North Vietnam (most time spent in-country of any 60's Hollywood lib, other than Howard Dean's dead Laotian half-brother Skippy Dean)

Roger Clinton: Coke headed fat ass cracker racist, unfit to serve

Howard Dean: 0 for 0 (total nutcase, unfit to serve hamburgers much less in combat)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Good premise horrible movie
Posted by: joe2171 on Dec 29, 2006 7:46 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If Hollywood is going to make movies like this then the least that they could do is make good movies. Anyone who spends any time reading movie reviews on the many and varied internet movie sites before going to see a particular movie will have long been scared off of this particular stinker. This is one movie that may just slide in to the number one spot in the fiercely contested "worst movie of 2006" contest. I haven't seen a movie which has been so universally panned since the Dukes of Hazzard Debacle last year, and at least you can say that the makers of that disaster were not trying to take themselves or their movie seriously, unlike this one!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

And YOU, Cheney/Bush?????
Posted by: Ellie1 on Jan 25, 2007 1:27 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
First of all your facts are inaccurate. But then you are a Repuke, so that qualifies as a major liar and a-hole. Repubs are only good at starting wars for no reason. How many Repuke kids would be on your list? Take your head out of your butt and do some Repuke research. NONE of your talking heads you love so much ever served anything but drug pushers. Your are a f'in liar.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]