Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Bush Could Usher in a Very Dangerous New Year

By Robert Parry, Consortium News. Posted December 26, 2006.


Intelligence sources say President Bush -- along with Israel's Ehud Olmert and the UK's Tony Blair -- are weighing the possibility of Israeli-led attacks on Syria and Iran in early 2007, with the United States providing logistical back-up.
Advertisement

The first two or three months of 2007 represent a dangerous opening for an escalation of war in the Middle East, as George W. Bush will be tempted to "double-down" his gamble in Iraq by joining with Israel's Prime Minister Ehud Olmert and outgoing British Prime Minister Tony Blair to strike at Syria and Iran, intelligence sources say.

President Bush's goal would be to transcend the bloody quagmire bogging down U.S. forces in Iraq by achieving "regime change" in Syria and by destroying nuclear facilities in Iran, two blows intended to weaken Islamic militants in Iraq, Lebanon and the Palestinian territories.

The Israeli army and air force would carry the brunt of any new fighting albeit with the support of beefed-up U.S. ground and naval forces in the Middle East, the sources said. Bush is now considering a "surge" in U.S. troop levels in Iraq from about 140,000 to as many as 170,000. He also has dispatched a second aircraft carrier group to the coast of Iran.

So far, however, Bush has confronted stiff opposition from the Pentagon's Joint Chiefs of Staff to the plan for raising troop levels in Iraq, partly because the generals don't think it makes sense to commit more troops without a specific military mission.

But it's unclear how much the generals know about the expanded-war option which has been discussed sometimes in one-on-one meetings among the principals -- Bush, Olmert and Blair -- according to intelligence sources.

Since the Nov. 7 congressional elections, the three leaders have conducted a round-robin of meetings that on the surface seem to have little purpose. Olmert met privately with Bush on Nov. 13; Blair visited the White House on Dec. 7; and Blair conferred with Olmert in Israel on Dec. 18.

All three leaders could salvage their reputations if a wider war broke out in the Middle East and then broke in their favor.

Bush and Blair spearheaded the March 2003 invasion of Iraq that has since turned into a disastrous occupation. In summer 2006, Olmert launched offensives against Hamas in Gaza and Hezbollah in Lebanon, drawing international condemnation for the deaths of hundreds of civilians and domestic criticism for his poorly designed war plans.

The three leaders also find themselves cornered by political opponents. Bush's Republican Party lost control of both the House and Senate on Nov. 7; Blair succumbed to pressure from his own Labour Party and agreed to step down in spring 2007; and Olmert is suffering from widespread public disgust over the failed Lebanese war.

Yet, despite these reversals, the three leaders have rebuffed advice from more moderate advisers that they adopt less confrontational strategies and consider unconditional negotiations with their Muslim adversaries.

Most dramatically, Bush spurned a bipartisan Iraq Study Group plan that was co-authored by the Bush Family's long-time counselor, former Secretary of State James Baker.

Instead of heeding Baker's advice to begin a drawdown of U.S. troops from Iraq and start talks with Iran and Syria, Bush rejected the notion of a "graceful exit" and then set unacceptable preconditions for talks with Iran and Syria.

In other words, Baker tossed a life preserver to Bush who threw it back.

Victory agenda

Bush has continued to insist on "victory" in Iraq and has again ratcheted up his rhetoric. He now talks about waging a long war against Islamic "radicals and extremists," not just the original goal of defeating "terrorists with global reach."

At his news conference on Dec. 20, Bush cast this wider struggle against Islamists as a test of American manhood and perseverance by demonstrating to the enemy that "they can't run us out of the Middle East, that they can't intimidate America."

Bush suggested, too, that painful decisions lay ahead in the New Year.

"I'm not going to make predictions about what 2007 will look like in Iraq, except that it's going to require difficult choices and additional sacrifices, because the enemy is merciless and violent," Bush said.


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: israel, united kingdom, george bush, syria, iran

Robert Parry's new book is Secrecy & Privilege: Rise of the Bush Dynasty from Watergate to Iraq."

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Been Predicting this for Months....
Posted by: CatDad on Dec 26, 2006 12:47 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There are some scary times ahead for this nation. The only thing that has worked well for GW Bush (at least in the short-term) is war. People do what they are most comfortable/familiar with...and it's highly likely that W. will try to win the Iraq War by starting a new one with either Syria or Iran. Of couse the new Democratic Congress will sit idly by as he does this.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» TYPO in story Posted by: CounterCorp
» THINK ABOUT THIS Posted by: mdruss42
Blair and Bush Have Nothing Left, But Threats
Posted by: dhitch on Dec 26, 2006 1:05 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
After observing the fiasco in Iraq, no sane politician on the left or the right will allow them to lead us into another mess. The doctrine of premption has died on the vine in Iraq. Bush should be striving for more humble goals, like surviving the next 2 years without being impeached or going to jail.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Sit down and shut up, Junior
Posted by: edith on Dec 26, 2006 2:13 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The Dim Duke of Crawford must be told by

a)Congressional leaders: invade or bomb Iran and Syria and you are O-U-T

b) Military leaders: Move your draft dodger yellow butt to Crawford and have a nice rest there until 1/09 along with Dying Dick. Leave and you will be shot on sight. The JCS in coordinatiion with the Acting President, Nancy Pelosi, will run the DOD and the Acting President and congressional chairs will oversee appropriate domestic depts.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Sit down and shut up, Junior Posted by: Conservasaurus
» Colin Powell Mythology Posted by: CatDad
» RE: Colin Powell Mythology Posted by: lessbread
» RE: Sit down and shut up, Junior Posted by: Conservasaurus
» RE: Sit down and shut up, Junior Posted by: Conservasaurus
Now this WILL bring on energy independance.
Posted by: cmaukonen on Dec 26, 2006 2:15 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Because if this does happen, we can kiss Middle East oil good by.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

the end
Posted by: sasquuatch55 on Dec 26, 2006 2:51 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
WE ARE ALL DOOMED!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: the end Posted by: willymack
» RE: the end Posted by: g_suijuris
» RE: the end human faults Posted by: sasquuatch55
Iran, Syria . . . Nuh uh!
Posted by: JCR on Dec 26, 2006 3:22 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There is not going to be any attack on Iran or Syria. This is merely Alternet's way of saying "come on back in 2007 y'all" when the fearmongering will really go into overdrive.

As much as we all know Bush, Blair and Olmert are off their respective rockers, there is little chance of this happening. The military is hanging on by a thread in Iraq and we are expected to believe that Iran and Syria are next? Sorry, I would keep my eyes open for something big happening on the domestic front with those KBR summer camps finally being put to good use. Then, after the rabble rousers are locked up, the wider war will get underway.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Uh- huhhh Posted by: fifthworld
» RE: Uh- huhhh Posted by: JCR
» RE: Syria . . . Posted by: lessbread
» KBR Camps? Posted by: NowYogi
» RE: KBR Camps? Posted by: JCR
» RE: KBR Camps? Posted by: cindi
EURO OIL......
Posted by: picket on Dec 26, 2006 3:46 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
that is what it is all about. The 1% of the wealthy rule and the monetary system is in danger in US and Britain. Israel is committed to help with the problem.
The innocent blood is about the Euro.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

And just like Bush's Iraq gamble
Posted by: outlander55 on Dec 26, 2006 6:26 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This will fail miserably. It may trust America into it's own civil war. People will take to the streets. And if nuclear weapons are used, God save us all, because we will be no more.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Dooooomed! Dooooooooooomed!
Posted by: LegumeSam on Dec 26, 2006 6:27 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Let's all go out into the streets wearing sandwich boards proclaiming that "The End Is Near" and yell it to the rooftops!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

A DANGEROUS YEAR ? (YOU MEAN LIKE THE LAST 5)
Posted by: VZEQICVA on Dec 26, 2006 6:38 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Nothing new here. Bush has lived his life taking risks. He also has a history of failures that can't be matched. One disaster after another. Since March 2001 people have been dying because he thought a war would make him a great president. It's made him a global threat and it's made fools of Americans. The death count, Americans & Iraqis combined is probably close to Nagisaki- Hiroshima. That IS dangerous. He has to be stopped. Thanks, ANNA

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» He don't take risks Posted by: Krain61
Armageddin it?
Posted by: MonkeyBoy on Dec 26, 2006 6:48 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I can't imagine that the rest of the world will stay on the sidelines this time if the US, UK and Israel make a push to take the entire Middle East.

Giving Dubya as much power as Congress has over the past 6 years is like giving a monkey a can of gasoline and a box of matches.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Armageddin it? Posted by: Krain61
» RE: Armageddin it? Posted by: symcokid
In the mean time, Bush ARMS the biggest Islamic TERROR HARBOURING nation, PAKISTAN !
Posted by: Jason Jordan on Dec 26, 2006 7:25 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Yeah, that war on terror !

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Pakistan is ISI is CIA Posted by: tlv
Since they own us{London and who knows else}
Posted by: Krain61 on Dec 26, 2006 7:50 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What is the greatest financial scam in world history?
Chances are you won't even consider the Federal Reserve{Fed} to
be the recipient of that dubious honor.The Fed,a privatetly owned and tax
-exempt bank that is dominated by foreign bankers,obtains Federal Reserve
Notes from the the U.S. Treasury for roughly 3 cents each,whether it's a
$1 bill or a $50,000 bill.They then sell it back to us at face value,and
charge interest for "loaning" it to us.Privately owned expansion and illegal
usuryof the nation's money supply is equivalent to state-sanctioned
counterfeitingand economic parasitism.That is why we have 8 trillion plus
National dept,an amount greater than the value of all rel property in this
country.America is now legally bankrupt!
Can you see what's happening here?Can you understand that we,as American
citizens,have no real money of our own?So strong is the foreign banker's
stranglehold on America thatour Goverment cannot print it's own tax free,
usury-free money for it's own citizens.
If it could there would be no unemployment,no inflation,no recessions or
excessive taxes, etc.,and no astronomical National Dept.According to
former Congressman Bob Dole,in 1995,about %40 of the personal IRS
tax went to pay the interest on the nation dept.Senator Louis T. McFadden,
a chairman of the U.S. Banking & Currency Commission for 22 years, said
in 1934:"The Federal Reserve is one of the most corrupt institutions the
world has ever seen".
In 1963 President Kennedy, by means of an Executive Order,bypassed the
FED and issued real United States Notes with no dept or interest attached.
"Remember he was killed"
Go to a coin dealer and look at a 1963 Kennedy dollar ..
it say"United States Not" not "Federal Reserve Note"
According to Artical 1,Section 8 of the Constitution only United States Notes
are legal tender."Congress{not the Fed} shall have the power to coin money and
regulate the value thereof."Immeddiately after Kennedy's death the printing
was stopped and the existing legal notes were taken out of circulation.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

More from above
Posted by: Krain61 on Dec 26, 2006 7:58 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Many experts are convinced that the Fed ordered the CIA to assassinate the
Kennedy's for printing legal United States Treasury Notes.Over 20 individuals
with evidence to link the CIA to the murders were reportedly killed too.
How did it all happen? On December 23rd,1913,when many members had left for the
holidays ,the Federal Reserve Act was rammed through Congress.One of the few
congressmen who had understood all the issues at stake in this Act,Charles A.Lindburg
{father of the famous aviator}, said:This Act establishes the most gigantic trust on earth.
When the president{Wilson} signs this bill,the invisible goverment of the Monetary Power
will be legalized.Later Wilson remorsefully stated"I have unwittingly ruined my country"
Thomas Jefferson predited this would happen if we violated our Constitution and allowed
a bank like the FED to exist.Benjamin Franklin said that the primary reason for the
Revolutionary War was to stop the Bank Of England from doing what the Fed is doing to us
now.And guess what?The Bank Of England has more than just alittle finger in the Fed.
Few citizens are aware of this underhanded plot,and mainsteam media is making sure that
people remain ignorant.Why has the media remain silent?
Because it's controlled by the money the Fed leeches from the American Middle Class.
Henry Ford ,Sr once said:"If the people of this nation understood our banking and
monetary system,I believe there would be a revolution before tomorrow morning"
What's the solution? As per Congressional Record,the U.S. Goverment can buy back the
FED at any time for $450 million.But Congress has to Act.If the Congressmen aren't doing
there job.
the bribed elements should be voted out of office..Join the 1000's of Americans who are
helping to spread this information.Once enough citizens become aware of the truth our
lackluster Congress will be forsed to Act on the behalf of those it is suppose to serve..
More to come later!!!!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Think before you vote
Posted by: Krain61 on Dec 26, 2006 8:00 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Americans,living in what is called the richest nation on earth ,
seem always to be short on money.Wives are working and husbands are working just to make
ends meet.Much of this trouble can be traced to our present "dept-money"system.
When you take out a mortagge,your signed promissory note is a negotiable instrument under
the Uniform Commercial Code,and it is used to fund your morgage.All monies and interest
that repay the morgage are pure profit to the bank.Non-disclosure by the bank of this important
fact can be legal grounds to have your mortgage taken off the books and foreginen.
Just like the Federal Reserve,the Banks create money "out of thin air"Who is paying for the
banks ' Profit?All of us through added inflation. This is shocking and eye-opening information
on an unprecedented money scam perpetrated on the entire nation.A long-overdue education
for most of us.Fight inflation. Get rid of your BANK and join a credit Union!
"I believe that banking institutions are more dangerous to our liberty than standing armies.
Already they have raised up a monied aristocracy that has set the Goverment at Defiance.
The issuing power of {money} should be taken away from the banks and restored to the
people to whom it proerly belongs" Thomas Jefferson

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Think before you vote Posted by: bcgirl125
» RE: Think before you vote Posted by: Krain61
» RE: As If Posted by: Gregor
this is UNACCEPTABLE!
Posted by: World Can't Wait on Dec 26, 2006 11:33 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
and we must ACT!
worldcantwait.org

This Call of World Can't Wait--Drive Out the Bush Regime is ringing truer every day--

"YOUR GOVERNMENT, on the basis of outrageous lies, is waging a murderous and utterly illegitimate war in Iraq, with other countries in their sights.

YOUR GOVERNMENT is openly torturing people, and justifying it.

YOUR GOVERNMENT puts people in jail on the merest suspicion, refusing them lawyers, and either holding them indefinitely or deporting them in the dead of night.

YOUR GOVERNMENT is moving each day closer to a theocracy, where a narrow and hateful brand of Christian fundamentalism will rule.

YOUR GOVERNMENT suppresses the science that doesn't fit its religious, political and economic agenda, forcing present and future generations to pay a terrible price.

YOUR GOVERNMENT is moving to deny women here, and all over the world, the right to birth control and abortion.

YOUR GOVERNMENT enforces a culture of greed, bigotry, intolerance and ignorance.

People look at all this and think of Hitler - and they are right to do so. The Bush regime is setting out to radically remake society very quickly, in a fascist way, and for generations to come. We must act now; the future is in the balance.

Millions and millions are deeply disturbed and outraged by this. They recognize the need for a vehicle to express this outrage, yet they cannot find it; politics as usual cannot meet the enormity of the challenge, and people sense this.

There is not going to be some magical "pendulum swing." People who steal elections and believe they're on a "mission from God" will not go without a fight.

There is not going to be some savior from the Democratic Party. This whole idea of putting our hopes and energies into "leaders" who tell us to seek common ground with fascists and religious fanatics is proving every day to be a disaster, and actually serves to demobilize people.

But silence and paralysis are NOT acceptable. That which you will not resist and mobilize to stop, you will learn - or be forced - to accept. There is no escaping it: the whole disastrous course of this Bush regime must be STOPPED. And we must take the responsibility to do it.

And there is a way. We are talking about something on a scale that can really make a huge change in this country and in the world. We need more than fighting Bush's outrages one at a time, constantly losing ground to the whole onslaught. We must, and can, aim to create a political situation where the Bush regime's program is repudiated, where Bush himself is driven from office, and where the whole direction he has been taking society is reversed. We, in our millions, must and can take responsibility to change the course of history.

Acting in this way, we join with and give support and heart to people all over the globe who so urgently need and want this regime to be stopped.

This will not be easy. If we speak the truth, they will try to silence us. If we act, they will try to stop us. But we speak for the majority, here and around the world, and as we get this going we are going to reach out to the people who have been so badly fooled by Bush and we are NOT going to stop.

The point is this: history is full of examples where people who had right on their side fought against tremendous odds and were victorious. And it is also full of examples of people passively hoping to wait it out, only to get swallowed up by a horror beyond what they ever imagined. The future is unwritten. WHICH ONE WE GET IS UP TO US."
www.worldcantwait.org

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: this is UNACCEPTABLE! Posted by: mistery509
strange
Posted by: rsaxto on Dec 27, 2006 1:35 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Since the Bushies are very dangerous people it only makes sense that they will indulge in dangerous and strange plans. Bush, Olmert and Blair are the three prime assholes of the current world. Reckless bombing can only worsen things for the USA and clearly indicates that the Bushies should be impeached ASAP and Olmert and Blair should be out of office as well. These military-action-can-save-us fruitcakes are not worthy of governing anybody.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Total crazyness!!!
Posted by: hillstar on Dec 27, 2006 3:20 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We must be extremely vigilant. It is our responsibility to ourselves and the rest of the world to oppose any such plans..just put your e mail programs to good use, and bombard your senators and representatives with demands to oppose such crazy plans!!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Bush's Victory and Final Legacy... COUNT ON IT
Posted by: xbj on Dec 27, 2006 3:20 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Getting the United States nuked from sea to shining sea by everything that China and Russia can throw at it, over the suicidal US attempt at taking control of Iran's oil by nuking Iran.

Nothing less. Victory.

Bush's own family is counting on it... that's what they are building an escape compound in South America, far away from the fallout that will spread over the Northern Hemisphere...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

You can't do a thing about it.
Posted by: jjs on Dec 27, 2006 4:08 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Bush can do as he well pleases. Serious demonstrations on the level of those seen toward the end of the Viet Nam war will be considered as sufficient evidence of domestic civil unrest, thus giving this administration grounds to apply any and all methods against undefined domestic terrorists--dissenters, a critical media, the Internet. At this point, Bush is seriously insane, deluded. He will not tolerate internal strife. He now has unlimited authority to crush it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Too late Posted by: tlv
» NEVER Too late Posted by: Krain61
Bush no poker player
Posted by: Democritus on Dec 27, 2006 5:59 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If George W. Bush played no-limit Texas hold 'em poker he'd be easy pickings. Any plan of his to escalate war in the Middle East would be like going "all in" with a pair of deuces against someone who raised the pot when an ace came on the river.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

A wider war with Syria and Iran
Posted by: mylesh on Dec 27, 2006 6:20 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This will not happen without the Democratic Party leadership's support.
Therefore, we will have war with Syria and Iran.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

No War in 07
Posted by: robchapman on Dec 27, 2006 7:07 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I will take the contrarian view in this discussion and state categorically that the US will not expand its military role in the mideast in 07.

After the defeat they suffered in the war against Hezbollah last summer it is unlikely that the Israelis would "lead" a general war against Syria and Iraq.

Such a conflict would deprive Israel of the advantages of concentration and interior lines that have been essential to their past success.

Hezbollah showed the tactics that Arab forces could use to grind down the IDF in a miserable war of attrition.

Although the IDF has the reserves to win such a battle against Hezbollah whose field army numbers only 5,000 the hundreds of thousands of men that Syria or Iran alone could bring to bear could make the cost of such a conflict unsustainable for Israel.

Secondly if the IDF were deployed over a wide range in a country as distant from Israel as Iraq, what forces would Israel have to suppress the Palestineans, maintain internal security and protect her other borders?

Israel simply does not have the depth of resources needed to engage in a protacted, expensive and bloody struggle against her neighbors.

Adding a large and distant country like Iran into the mix would place Israel's existence in near-term jeopardy.

Does the UK have the stomach or resources for such a fight?

The British commanders in Afghanistan are already making public statements that they lack the force levels necessary to suppress the Taliban and prevent a civil war.

Can anyone imagine that a country whose forces cannot suppress the irregular, poorly trained, badly lead and scantily equipped Taliban is likely to prevail against the sort of forces that oil-rich and populous Iran would bring to bear in defense of their own territory?

The Iranians are nearly as numerous as the British and because of the youthfulness of their population would be able to muster a bigger army.

Clearly, the Iranians would be quick the master the tactics Hezbollah used last summer to bloody the Israelis.

That leaves us.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: No War in 07 Posted by: JCR
» RE: No War in 07 Posted by: Conservasaurus
TLV
Posted by: tlv on Dec 27, 2006 7:12 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The myth that Israel is the only friend we have amidst a sea of Islamic "enemies" is incorrect. What kind of friend withholds information that you are about to be bombed by passenger planes, that trains Kurds to fight anyone who attempts to invade (including U.S. forces), and attacks another of our friends in Northern Lebanon instead of the South where Hezbollah was the supposed target, and chooses to kill when diplomacy would have worked better. Israel provokes and then runs behind us after the fighting starts. They aren't our friends. They are runt bullies with nothing but arrogance and bigotry to back up their threats, but an arsenal of real weapons supplied OUR COUNTRY are used to do the actual killing! Why do we coddle and protect them? They are using us!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: TLV Posted by: NowYogi
» RE: Right to Exist Posted by: kbest
Why Condemning Israel and the Zionist Lobby is so Important By James Petras
Posted by: rwa on Dec 27, 2006 7:20 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
“It’s no great secret why the Jewish agencies continue to trumpet support for the discredited policies of this failed administration. They see defense of Israel as their number-one goal, trumping all other items on the agenda. That single-mindedness binds them ever closer to a White House that has made combating Islamic terrorism its signature campaign. The campaign’s effects on the world have been catastrophic. But that is no concern of the Jewish agencies.” December 8, 2006 statement by JJ Goldberg, editor of Forward (the leading Jewish weekly in the United States)

12/26/06 "Information Clearing House" -- -- Many Jewish writers, including those who are somewhat critical of Israel, have raised pointed questions about our critique of the Zionist power configuration (ZPC) in the United States and what they wrongly claim are our singular harsh critique of the state of Israel. Some of these accusers claim to see signs of ‘latent anti-Semitism’, others, of a more ‘leftist’ coloration, deny the influential role of the ZPC arguing that US foreign policy is a product of ‘geo-politics or the interests of big oil. With the recent publication of several widely circulated texts, highly critical of the power of the Zionist ‘lobby’, several liberal pro-Israel publicists generously conceded that it is a topic that should be debated (and not automatically stigmatized and dismissed) and perhaps be ‘taken into account.’

ZPC Deniers: Phony Arguments for Fake Claims

The main claims of ZPC deniers take several tacks: Some claim that the ZPC is just ‘another lobby’ like the Chamber of Commerce, the Sierra Club or the Society for the Protection of Goldfish. Others claim that by focusing mainly on Israel and by inference the ‘Lobby’, the critics of Zionism ignore the equally violent abuses of rulers, regimes and states elsewhere. This ‘exclusive focus’ on Israel, the deniers of ZPC argue, reveals a latent or overt anti-Semitism. They propose that human rights advocates condemn all human rights abusers everywhere (at the same time and with the same emphasis?). Others still argue that Israel is a democracy – at least outside of the Occupied Territories (OT) – and therefore is not as condemnable as other human rights violators and should be ‘credited’ for its civic virtues along with its human rights failings. Finally others still claim that, because of the Holocaust and ‘History-of-Two-Thousand-Years-of-Persecution’, criticism of Jewish-funded and led pro-Israel lobbies should be handled with great prudence, making it clear that one criticizes only specific abuses, investigates all charges – especially those from Arab/Palestinian/United Nations/European/Human Rights sources -- and recognizes that Israeli public opinion, the press and even the Courts or sectors of them may also be critical of regime policies.

These objections to treating the Israeli-Palestinian-Arab conflict and the activities of Zionist Lobbies as central to peace and war serve to dilute, dissipate and deflate criticism and organized political activity directed at the ZPC and its directors in Israel.

The response of the critics of Israel and the ZPC to these attacks has been weak at best and cowardly at worst. Some critics have responded that their criticism is only directed toward a specific policy or leader, or to Israeli policies in the OT and that they recognize Israel is a democracy, that it requires secure borders, and that it is in the interests of the Israeli ‘people’ to lower their security barriers. Others argue that their criticism is directed at securing Israeli interests, influencing the Zionist Lobby or to opening a debate...
Balance of article:
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article15989.htm

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Bushwhacko
Posted by: hapibeli on Dec 27, 2006 7:40 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
George W. Bush, the Whack de tutti Whacko, and his consiglieri, Dick, the Grimace, Cheney.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

No War in 07
Posted by: robchapman on Dec 27, 2006 7:44 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The current debate about a US invasion of Iran and or Syria has taken a bit of the luster off the Christmas season.

GW Bush, who campaigned for President as a uniter and not a divider has divided us during the season of peace with discussion of yet another optional war.

Ironically, one of the GOP rationales for invading Iraq was that the Saddam Hussein regime threatened its neighbors with military force.

Is the American population really capable of breaking its word and doing exactly what it said it was trying to prevent?

This is an instance that calls for reasoned dialog and discussion at the grass roots level.

American peace activists should seek out people who are concerned about our security and prone to support the administration and talk to them.

There is no need to rehash past mistakes or to call people names or reproach them.

Remind them that they supported the Administration for principled and worthy reasons and remind them of the promises they made to the rest of us when they advocated military action.

Particularly remind them of their promises to bring peace and prosperity to the Persian Gulf region.

Challenge them as to whether a wider war and invasion of Iran supports their goal and whether it is a feasilble response to events.

My experience is that this sort of reasoned and non-threatening dialogue has changed many minds.

Bush is currently seeking to shore up his support among conservative Democrats and security minded moderates.

His political offensive is weak and so far ineffective.

The President's December 20 press conference was a disaster. Its time of day and the day on which he chose to speak guarenteed low public exposure to his remarks.

The President's December 20 press conference was all but invisible.

If the President was using the press conference to communicate with the American people, and there is no reason to think otherwise, he failed.

This is a stark contrast with the media savvy and effectiveness that Bush has displayed in the past.

Clearly, the strains of the office are affecting his judgement and he is losing even his undisputed qualities of strength.

If Bush is losing his media savvy what does he have left?

Clearly his political judgement, strategic thinking, and administrative abilities are questionable if not downright mediocre.

If we on the left can avoid shrill invective and talk calmly and persuasively to moderates and conservatives instead, we can certainly isolate Bush farther.

The effect of isolating Bush will be to change the political dynamics.

Such a change in the political dynamics will make congressional oversight for war opperations stronger.

Isolating Bush will assist in moving resources away from war related activities and toward other national goals in the appropriations process.

Isolating Bush will help us reverse the infringements of the Constitution and erosion of American liberty that have been enacted at the Administration's behest.

Isolating Bush will help reverse the Administration's policies of torture and mistreatment of men interned by the military in war zones.

Isolating Bush will strengthen the elements of the GOP that oppose the war.

Isolating Bush will strengthen the moderates in both parties and advance the national healing that is necessary after the divisiveness and polarity fostered by the divide and conquer governing strategy of the Bush Administraion.

Most of all isolating Bush will bring people who are willing to work for peace with justice- replacing than those calling for sacrifice toward false victory- to the forefront.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

WHAT?!
Posted by: monkeywrench on Dec 27, 2006 8:39 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
From the article:
"President Bush's goal would be to transcend the bloody quagmire bogging down U.S. forces in Iraq by achieving "regime change" in Syria and by destroying nuclear facilities in Iran."

Oh, yeah, Bush will "transcend" it all right – by expanding the bloody quagmire five-fold. Of course, in his twisted mind, the "war" in Iraq has gone so swimmingly well that why not take on the region's junkyard dog, Iran, right? (When you find yourself in a hole, stop digging; you don't fight an oil fire by pouring gasoline on it; you don't stop lemmings from going over a cliff by shoving more in behind them; [fill in your own cliche:_____].)

What is it going to take for the sheeple of America to realize that we are being led by madmen? In this new potential debacle, we can only hope for a Pentagon refusal – somebody over there must have the common sense our Vietnam-dodger president lacks.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

US Must Accept a New World Order - Islamic Crescent
Posted by: sofla100 on Dec 27, 2006 9:07 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The Bush fiasco with Iraq will finally end with several Arab countries in the Middle East obtaining dominance and a certain amount of control in the region. Perhaps, Hamas, Hezballah, Syria and Iran-Iraq, will be to a certain degree, united. The Bush mistake however is to see this as absolutely a "bad thing," but this is not the "cold war" anymore, and Bush (and company) need to re-think things. An Islamic crescent will just be a natural emergence of powers in the region exercising solidarity and alliance. Much as the USA is allied with countries via NATO and other treaties. Furthermore, an Islamic Crescent will have no problem selling oil to the USA, and might even be easier to deal with collectively then the countries and powers individually. Lastly, it will check Israel, the military powerhouse in the region that is blocking peace right now. So, Bush needs to study this and see that it will ultimately be good for the USA and good for the region and the world.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

What is REALLY going on (part I)
Posted by: Carl Street on Dec 27, 2006 10:01 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
My take on the Israel/Palestine situation is (surprise surprise) radically different than most...

First, a little history. Following WWII, the victorious powers attempted to reestablish their pre-war colonial patterns. Among the first to attempt this was France who tried it in both French Indo-China (Viet Nam) and French Algeria. However, WWII had left a legacy of weapons caches; huge quantities of arms both indigenous and available in post war arms markets. More importantly, their haste to draft native peoples as cannon fodder had created a large cadre of battle-hardened, experienced and bloodied troops who knew how to use those weapons and, had been trained in sabotage and guerilla operations, etc.

Observing the fiascos created by French and British attempts to reestablish their influence in the Far East, India and North Africa, the USA recognized that any attempt to colonialize the Middle East was probably doomed to failure and/or at least result in such protracted and expensive military operations as to render it impractical. So they hit upon a diabolically clever scheme to colonize by proxy by creating the "state" of Israel.

This solved a number of problems for the USA....

1. We had large quantities of DP's (displaced persons) in Europe following WWII and had already suffered a political disaster in Operation Keel Haul of trying to forcibly "repatriate" (dump) them on the East after WWII so we needed an alternative "dumping ground" for these largely undocumented refugees -- all we had to do was declare them "jews" -- if you look at their real ethnicity you would be amazed at who suddenly became "jewish". This last was especially true because the USA made all kinds of promises of land, prosperity (land flowing with milk an honey?), and opportunity to people who had no economic options in post war Europe and, thus, many suddenly decided that adopting the identity of being a "persecuted jew" was their best shot and willingly and enthusiastically took the Israel option regardless of their actual ethnicity and/or religious persuasion. Without documentation, who could prove otherwise -- so it was an easy sale.
2. War weary USA citizens would probably NOT support a USA incursion into the Middle East; and these DP's and a loose rabble of radical Zionist idealists were the perfect patsies to become cannon fodder in a USA Middle Eastern invasion by proxy. Once they arrived, they had NO option but to fight for their lives against the indigenous peoples as there was no going back.
3. The USA could assume the politically popular mantle of being a modern Moses conducting a modern Exodus instead of a foreign invader.
4. In a classic Rhodes operation, the USA had created an economically and militarily dependent minority surrounded by hostile powers that either obeyed USA dictums or faced extinction. Thus these "new jews" were and are in reality hostages suckered into being USA colonialist proxies.
5. Large quantities of self-deluding REAL Jews world wide have also been suckered into supporting ISRAEL politically and economically and will shout down anyone who points out the obvious charade I have listed above as "anti-semitic" thus solving the problem of USA political propaganda. It is the equivalent of USA citizens "supporting the troops" by sending them to their deaths in a foreign lands and all the while feeling smugly patriotic; of course, these "patriots" would not DREAM of going themselves. I have no doubt that even some of the Israeli locals themselves are unaware of their hostage status and buy into the well crafted illuson of their supposed autonomy.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

What is REALLY going on (part II)
Posted by: Carl Street on Dec 27, 2006 10:02 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
6. It was also a classic divide and conquer move. The fact is the Arabs are as semitic a people as the real Jews. But in the bizzaro world of USA propaganda; phony jews who are NOT even remotely semitic peoples killing real semitic peoples in Palestine is "pro-semitic" while criticizing those same killings of semites by non-semites is "anti-semitic". Thus by using the Israel ploy we undermined much of what could have been a united front against USA colonialism.

The reality is that Israel is NOT a country; in fact; it is NOT even a colony; it is an American military base -- this is easy to see if one takes off the propaganda induced blinders and looks at the raw facts:

1. A country is a politically autonomous geographical area with a self-sustaining economy; common history; language; and the military ability to control its borders.
2. A Colony is a geographical area with limited political autonomy (can't make their own foreign policy) with an economy captivated by a "mother" country and reliant upon the military prowess of same.
3. A Military BASE is a geographical area that is completely dependent upon a "mother" country for supplies (has little or no sustaining economy); no political autonomy (they follow orders).

Israel is a USA base. Of course, large smoke-screen operations are conducted to mask this and pretend they have autonomy; but the economic and military reality is that if we withdrew our support the place would implode within a few weeks -- at most. Moreover, did you know that refusing to do business with Israel is a FEDERAL CRIME in the USA? ONLY ONE other entity is covered by that same law -- refusing to do business with the USA Military!

Perhaps more importantly, Israel's proxy fallacy allows the USA to conduct radical foreign policy experiments with little or no risk. For example, if Iran is bombed, I have no doubt that "Israeli mavericks" will do it; while we sit by and claim we were "surprised" -- followed by the ultimate in hypocrisy; we will no doubt offer to broker a peace.

Finally, The Israel proxy fallacy gives the USA political and military cliques the ultimate money laundering machine. Large quantities of funds can be "lent" to Israel (none of which is ever paid back) which then are used to "purchase" and/or develop military hardware. Also, these funds are used to fund "campaign contributions"; covert operations; compromise, threaten and murder anyone who threatens this system. It is the perfect way of funneling huge amounts of funds into the hands of the PIP's (People In Power) without the inconvenience of audits and oversight.

The LAST thing the USA wants is peace in the Middle East. The interests of the PIP's is best served by continued strife. It not only provides an excuse to populate and sustain military bases throughout the area; but it also keeps the locals from organizing any real threat to the system or even developing their own resources and independent economies. Thus, sustained conflict in the Middle East is the perfect tool to keep the locals in a permanent colonial status.

I may NOT have all the details right; but THINK about it -- despite WWII being over 60 years in the past we have a range of world-wide bases that Hitler and Tojo could only dream about. As I have said before; ignore the patter (story) and watch the hands (what is going on) if you REALLY want to know the truth.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]