Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

Announcing the P.U.-litzer Prizes for 2006

By Norman Solomon and Jeff Cohen, AlterNet. Posted December 26, 2006.


Many can plausibly lay claim to stinky media performances, but only a few can win a P.U.-litzer.
12262006story
12262006Story

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

In Special Coverage

Belief:
Is Blind Faith in God and the Bible a Modern Invention?
Devilstower

Corporate Accountability and WorkPlace:
Who's Paying for the Recession Most of All? Young Workers
Lizzy Ratner

DrugReporter:
Lies About Marijuana Drive People to a Much More Harmful Drug -- Booze
Steve Fox

Environment:
Why Max Baucus' 'No' Vote on the Climate Bill May Really Help Its Passage
Jeff Mcmahon

Food:
Soda Helps Make Americans Unhealthy and Fat -- Will Soda Tax Prevail Despite Pushback by Beverage Industry?
Christine Spolar, Joseph Eaton

Health and Wellness:
Do We Really Want to Enshrine Insurance Monopoly into Law? This and 5 Other Complaints About the Health Bill
John Nichols

Immigration:
NYC Marathon Raises Question of Who Is American Enough?
James E. Johnson, Jr.

Media and Technology:
How Biased Media Can Brainwash You
Melinda Burns

Movie Mix:
The Yes Men: Pranksters Out to Fix the World
Mark Engler

Politics:
4 Ways the Stupak Amendment Deprives Women of Access to Abortion
Jessica Arons

Reproductive Justice and Gender:
How the Stupak Amendment Radically Undermines Abortion Rights
Rachel Morris

Rights and Liberties:
"My Kids Want to Hide Their Identity; They're Scared Someone Will Attack Us": U.S. Muslims Being Targeted
Jaisal Noor

Sex and Relationships:
9 Silly Things People Say When They Hear You Don't Want Kids (And Ways to Counter Them)
Liz Langley

Take Action:
G-20 Meetings: Nothing Much Happened in the Suites, and There Was Too Much Punch in the Streets
Laura Flanders

Water:
Why Natural Gas Is Not a Clean Energy Panacea
Stan Cox

World:
10 Suicides a Month at Ft. Hood -- War Stress Is Taking Soldiers to the Brink
Dahr Jamail

More stories by Norman Solomon Jeff Cohen

Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

Competition has been fierce this year for the fifteenth annual P.U.-litzer Prizes.

Many can plausibly lay claim to stinky media performances, but only a few can win a P.U.-litzer. As the judges for this un-coveted award, Jeff Cohen and I have deliberated with due care. (Jeff is the founder of the media watch group FAIR and author of the superb new book "Cable News Confidential: My Misadventures in Corporate Media.")

And now, the winners of the P.U.-litzer Prizes for 2006:


"Fact-Free Trade" Award -- New York Times columnist Thomas Friedman

In a press corps prone to cheer on corporate-drafted trade agreements as the key to peace and plenty in the world, no cheerleader is more fervent than Tom Friedman. During a CNBC interview with Tim Russert in July, Friedman confessed: "I was speaking out in Minnesota -- my hometown, in fact -- and a guy stood up in the audience, said, 'Mr. Friedman, is there any free trade agreement you'd oppose?' I said, 'No, absolutely not.' I said, 'You know what, sir? I wrote a column supporting the CAFTA, the Caribbean Free Trade initiative. I didn't even know what was in it. I just knew two words: free trade.'" (Friedman may not have read even the pact's title; CAFTA actually stands for the Central America Free Trade Agreement.)


Lock up the First Amendment Prize -- CNN's William Bennett

Soon after being hired as a CNN pundit, Bennett went on his radio talk show and offered his views on freedom of the press -- and on reporters who broke stories about warrantless wiretapping and secret CIA detention sites "against the wishes of the president, against the request of the president and others." Bennett fumed: "Are they embarrassed, are they arrested? No, they win Pulitzer Prizes. I don't think what they did was worthy of an award -- I think what they did was worthy of jail, and I think this investigation needs to go forward."


Broke-Brain Mouthing Award-- MSNBC's Chris Matthews

As the movie "Brokeback Mountain" (about a relationship between two cowboys) was gaining attention and audience in January, Chris Matthews appeared on the Imus show to hail "the wonderful Michael Savage" and the talk-show host's nickname for the movie: "Bareback Mounting." Matthews and Savage had been MSNBC colleagues until "the wonderful" Savage was fired -- after referring to an apparently gay caller as a "sodomite" and telling him to "get AIDS and die." Now that's hardball.


Casual About Casual Ties Award -- Fox mogul Rupert Murdoch

Echoing an Iraq war talking-point heard regularly on Fox News, owner Murdoch said on the eve of the November election: "The death toll, certainly of Americans there, by the terms of any previous war are quite minute." As FAIR noted, U.S. deaths in Iraq exceed those in the War of 1812, the Mexican-American War and the Spanish-American War, not to mention the combined U.S. deaths of all this country's other military actions since Vietnam -- including Lebanon, Grenada, Panama, the first Gulf War, Somalia, Haiti, Kosovo and Afghanistan.


Front-Page Pundit Award -- Reporter Michael Gordon and The New York Times

With many voters telling pollsters that they want U.S. troops to leave Iraq, the Times front-paged a post-election analysis by Michael Gordon -- headlined "Get Out of Iraq Now? Not So Fast, Experts Say" -- quoting three hand-picked "experts" who decried the possibility of troop withdrawal. Gordon didn't tell readers that one of his "experts," former CIA analyst Ken Pollack, had relentlessly promoted an Iraq invasion based on wildly false claims about an Iraqi threat. Gordon took off his reporter's hat that night on CNN to become an unabashed advocate for his view that withdrawing U.S. troops from Iraq would lead to "civil war" (as though civil war weren't already underway).


"Prove You're Not a Traitor" Prize -- CNN's Glenn Beck

In November, Beck -- an Islamophobic host on CNN Headline News -- launched into his interview with Congressman-elect Keith Ellison, a Muslim American, this way: "I have been nervous about this interview with you, because what I feel like saying is, 'Sir, prove to me that you are not working with our enemies.'" Beck then added: "And I know you're not. I'm not accusing you of being an enemy, but that's the way I feel, and I think a lot of Americans will feel that way." Is it possible that primetime bigots like CNN's Beck have something to do with the prejudices "that a lot of Americans feel"?


Goundhog Day Award -- Ted Koppel

One role of journalism should be to help the public learn from past government policy disasters in hopes of preventing future ones. But in a New York Times column on Oct. 2, former ABC News star Koppel wrote that Washington should tell Iran it is free to develop an atomic bomb -- with a Mafia-like warning: "If a dirty bomb explodes in Milwaukee, or some other nuclear device detonates in Baltimore or Wichita, if Israel or Egypt or Saudi Arabia should fall victim to a nuclear 'accident,' Iran should understand that the United States government will not search around for the perpetrator. The return address will be predetermined, and it will be somewhere in Iran." In other words, no matter what the evidence, Koppel urged our government to attack a predetermined foe, Iran. Didn't that happen in 2003 with Iraq?


So, there they are, the P.U.-litzer Prizes for 2006. Hold your nose and prepare yourself for 2007.

Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: media, pundits

Norman Solomon is the author of the new book, "War Made Easy: How Presidents and Pundits Keep Spinning Us to Death."

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Left Gatekeeping award - Norman Soloman, Jeff Cohen, Amy Goodman
Posted by: LeftWright on Dec 26, 2006 12:56 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Noam Chomsky and a very long list.

For their continued promotion of the government's 9/11 Myth, now thoroughly discredited by true progressives and many others.

Millions have realized the truth about 9/11 and now reject the absurd government conspiracy myth of 19 hijackers with boxcutters. More come to the truth every day.

I guess all that foundation money is hard to say no to. You shred your credibility every day you cling to the ridiculous government farce of a story.

Wake up!

The truth shall set you free. Love is the only way forward.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Korea comes to mind Posted by: LeftWright
» It is nothing of the kind Posted by: brunowe
» what?? Posted by: launcher
» You are either ignorant Posted by: NowYogi
» I meant brunowne Posted by: NowYogi
» RE: It is nothing of the kind Posted by: launcher
» I think you're right, mjabele Posted by: launcher
Can't we add Michael Moore..........
Posted by: Conservasaurus on Dec 26, 2006 1:23 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
most misleading docu-comedy regarding 9-11!!! Editing his way through facts to create fabulous fiction.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Typical GOP knee-jerking Posted by: Knowmad
» RE: Typical GOP knee-jerking Posted by: Conservasaurus
» Well said Posted by: launcher
» RE: Can’t we just ignore him?..... Posted by: mountainsrock
» RE: Can’t we just ignore him?..... Posted by: Conservasaurus
» Anne Coulter entertaining? Posted by: Ellie1
» RE: Anne Coulter entertaining? Posted by: Conservasaurus
Almost perfect
Posted by: veive on Dec 26, 2006 1:27 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The list of rancid reporters is almost perfect. I take exception with the knock on Koppel. When you're fighting an amorphous mess in Mesopotamia, it helps to have a target that everyone can relate to and care about. If the correct targets are selected and the terrorists are aware of these sites as targets, perhaps they might reconsider detonating their own weapons. After all, if you were told that there'd be a tenfold response should you happen to attack someone, you might not be inclined to attack that someone. It's one thing to be a suicide bomber but you might hesitate before doing something that turns the people and places you love into the recipients of retaliation for your suicide.

Please, take Koppel off the list. With a little tweaking his approach may be the only viable "War on terror" strategy. The rest of the list are consumate stinkers.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Almost perfect Posted by: Graeme
» RE: Almost perfect Posted by: veive
» Almost perfect terrorism Posted by: HeroesAll
Another Problem
Posted by: NoPCZone on Dec 26, 2006 2:03 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The problem is not reporting- it's distribution. Warning bells have been going off all over the place and have been distributed widely on media easily accessible to most every American.

Here are 15 programs on 9-11, terrorism, Iraq, the Taliban, Al Quaeda, etc. that can be viewed at any time online that have aired at least TWICE on Frontline on every PBS station in the US.

http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/view/

Here are (4) 2006 episodes (more in previous years) on AIR- America's Investigative Reports- also aired on PBS and available online.

http://www.pbs.org/wnet/air/episodes.html

Now has addressed these issues repeatedly since it's launch and airs weekly on every PBS station.

http://www.pbs.org/now/thisweek/archive.html

Nova has addressed the war many times- also on PBS

http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/archive/

Independent Lens has also covered these issues repeatedly- also on PBS.

http://www.pbs.org/independentlens/

That's before you get to Amy Goodman and others . The problem is that we have a lazy public that would rather watch American Idol than learn the truth. PBS is more widely available than any commercial network (over 99% of the population can get PBS with just an antenna) and maintains a huge website that allows archived shows to be watched on demand.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

MSNBC Chris Matthews Interviewing Tom Delay
Posted by: CatDad on Dec 26, 2006 2:19 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This deserves to be on the list. This interview which took place right after DeLay resigned from Congress, got a "ten" on the nausea scale. "Hardball" host Chris Matthews decided to play "softball" to get a ratings coup by being the first to interview the fallen politician. Matthews bascially let Mr. DeLay have free reign over the interview and allowed him to play the role of "victim" to a hilt....The whole issue was not about corruption but about politicians with Christian principles being harrassed....No mention of the "K" Street Project....No questioning ethics...just a beatific Tom Delay playing a victim.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

BOOBY PRIZE 2006 @ the LIMITED HANGOUT “LEFT”
Posted by: Hal on Dec 26, 2006 6:30 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
So we get another round from N. Solomon, J. Cohen and the “left” gatekeeper choir on how their more illustrious MSM crew are sellouts (as if no one knew).

The obvious proposition and counterpoint here is that Solomon, Cohen, Chomsky, Goodman, Katrina Heuvel and the rest are models of true government oversight on peace, war, and public policy.

NOT.

A clear and present 911 cover-up goes unanswered by the so-called establishment “left” or “right”. This, even as mavericks from all sides have come out to challenge the official claptrap out of corporate cartel whorehouse Washington and its carny barker of an MSM.

All we typically get from Solomon, Chomsky, Goodman, Heuvel, etc, etc, is the retread obvious known from before the first bomb drop “shock and awe” over Eurasia and the Mid East.

This is as far from real opposition as it gets without making even more of an embarrassing out of a mock progressive agenda.

It’s pure limited hangout.

And it’s simply about defending new lies for old on behalf of a systemic fraud that is both parasite and anathema to human life.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» NATIONAL CON STATE Posted by: Hal
Strange as it may seem...
Posted by: HeroesAll on Dec 26, 2006 11:24 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...it is possible to write an article that doesn't refer to September 11th 2001. Believe it or not. There are actually issues beside that one, and some of us are interested. Some of us, indeed, don't depend on a steady diet of 911 morning, noon, and night.

Just so you know.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Do you? Posted by: mjabele
» Crediblility Void Posted by: Hal
» RE: Crediblility Void Posted by: mjabele
» Spin-Cycle BRAINWASH Posted by: Hal
» RE: Spin-Cycle BRAINWASH Posted by: HeroesAll
brokeback
Posted by: rsaxto on Dec 27, 2006 12:18 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We have a brokeback mainstream media: it isn't just spineless - it's back has been totally broken. Its praise of greed and aggressive war and environmental destruction is relentless, arrogant and stupid.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Check out the photoshops for Solomon's article here...
Posted by: ghandi on Dec 27, 2006 2:38 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Media
Posted by: theskywolf on Dec 27, 2006 7:44 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'm getting very distressed about "Democracy Now!."

In their coverage this morning on Gerald Ford's demise, Amy Goodman didn't see fit to even mention Ford's obfuscation and whitewashing of the Warrent Commission report that supposedly looked into JFK's assasination. Instead, she spent about 90% of the report on the East Timor debacle.

Not that the East Timor genocide and Ford's role in it should be denied by any means, but Ford's involvement in the Warren Commission should have at least been explored more thoroughly.

I've noticed as well that Democracy Now! also steadfastly ignores the War on Some Drugs. With an American being arrested every 42 seconds on a pot charge, and the Incarceration Nation becoming that way because of the WOSD, you would think DN! would have some concern.
They'd rather run another story about Haiti, going over the same old ground they've run for years.

They've said very little about environment. And when they do deal with this issue, it's either not enough or more than is necessary. They've said very little about the Democrats malfeasance, their backing away in fear of impeachment, and their budding support of not ending the Iraq war. They've said nothing about the increase in age discrimination in hiring, nor the true state of the economy.

I fully realize that they can't cover everything, but they could cut some of their stories down considerably to make room for other, equally important information.

Democracy Now! is dropping the ball and doesn't seem to want to pick it up. Therefore, I would say if they're the "Gatekeepers of the Left," we're in deep trouble.

Skywolf.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Media Posted by: NowYogi
» RE: Media Posted by: dover23
How about the shoddy reporting on election-related gas price manipulation?
Posted by: thoughtcriminal on Dec 27, 2006 12:14 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It's rather amusing to see how many commentators took this opportunity to attack the alternative independent press in the United States. This is such a standard approach - the agent provocateur, the tar & smear operation, the straw man attack, and so on.

As far as a real story that the media isn't covering, consider the media's coverage of the manipulation of gas prices before and after the November elections. NPR's headline was "Curb Your Conspiracy Theories on Gas Prices".

Bernie Sanders seems to be much closer to the truth: "Critics of the oil industry have speculated that gas prices nationwide dropped leading up to the November election as a way to help pro-business Republicans retain control of Congress. That's a view held by Rep. Bernard Sanders, I-Vt., who won election last month to the Senate.

"During the campaign I expressed the view that gas prices would probably rise after the election," Sanders said in a statement. "Given the fact that high gas prices were a major political problem for the Republicans coming into the election, I was not surprised that prices went down as we got close to Election Day. Nor am I surprised that they have risen since the election."


Now, Bloomberg is reporting that Oil Falls to 1-Month Low as Mild Weather Cuts U.S. Fuel Demand. Does anyone expect gas prices to fall as a result? The oil companies have enjoyed world-record profits the last few years, thanks to Bush&Co. - of course they're trying to manipulate elections for their financial benefit. Do you think the NYT or the WP or CNN has assigned an investigative reporter to this story? I'd bet not.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Uncle Crabby,
Posted by: mountainsrock on Dec 27, 2006 3:55 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
..you hit the nail on the head. Just don't read 'Conservoasses' posts or reply to them, damn, now I actually spent a minute on it....sh..

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Uncle Crabby, Posted by: Melvin
Bigotry is whose fault?
Posted by: Mike Turnauer, Vancouver,WA on Dec 27, 2006 10:13 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"Is it possible that primetime bigots like CNN's Beck have something to do with the prejudices "that a lot of Americans feel"?"

Um, no. A bigot has noone but oneself for one's bigotry. CNN is to blame for allowing a bigot to hold prime time forum.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement