Wikipedia vs. Women
Belief:
Do Atheists Have God All Wrong?
Troy Jollimore
Corporate Accountability and WorkPlace:
We're Doing a Heckuva Job Helping Those Devastated by the Economic Meltdown
Karen Dolan, Diana Pearce
DrugReporter:
DEA Forced to Scrub Misleading Info on the American Medical Association's Position on Marijuana
Charmie Gholson
Environment:
The Choice at Copenhagen: Heroism or Collective Suicide
Johann Hari
Food:
The 6 Weirdest, Scariest Processed Foods
Brad Reed
Health and Wellness:
25 Years Since the Bhopal Disaster, We've All Become Victims of the Chemical Industry
Gary Cohen
Immigration:
Italy's Media Wrestle With Immigrant-Bashing
Sandip Roy
Media and Technology:
10 Biggest Sports Sex Scandals of All Time: How Does Tiger Woods Rate?
David Rosen
Movie Mix:
Disney Apocalypse: Why 2012 Sucks
Alexander Zaitchik
Politics:
Memo to Congress: Desperate Times Call for Faster Measures
Paul Starr
Reproductive Justice and Gender:
What Happened When an Anti-Choice Catholic Woman Needed an Abortion at Dr. Tiller's Clinic
Amanda Mueller
Rights and Liberties:
Four Men Leave Guantanamo; Two Face Ill-Defined Trials in Italy
Andy Worthington
Sex and Relationships:
6 Tricks to Sex After a Divorce
Julie Bogart
Take Action:
G-20 Meetings: Nothing Much Happened in the Suites, and There Was Too Much Punch in the Streets
Laura Flanders
Water:
Melting Himalayan Glaciers Threaten 1.3 Billion Asians
World:
Over 1,000 Delegates for Peace Will Mark 1st Anniversary of Gaza Invasion, Protest Ongoing Israeli Siege
Medea Benjamin
Two years ago tech entrepreneur Joi Ito was spending a lot of time with the managers and editors of the collaborative encyclopedia Wikipedia, and he noticed that there were far more women wikipedians than women bloggers. In late 2004, Ito wrote in his blog:
Wikipedia seems much more gender balanced than the blogging community ... I wonder what causes this difference in gender distribution? Is it that the power law aspect of blogs is inherently more competitive and appeals to the way men are "trained" in society? Or is it that we're just talking to the "head" of the blog curve and that the more interesting blogs are actually by women in "the long tail"? Or is it something about Wikipedia that attracts powerful women?He received a handful of comments, almost entirely from men, which all boiled down to "I don't know" or "maybe women are just more collaborative." As far as I know, Ito never got any good answers to his questions.
Instead of feeling excluded, try to see [WikiChix] as an opportunity to hear a conversation you would not hear otherwise. If men are not talking, what women say to each other becomes a different conversation. When we as women can stop defending ourselves and explaining that bias, sexism, or patriarchy exist, then we can move further in discussion and support of each other.Is it really separatism if these women are posting in a public forum? I think not. They've simply created a public forum where all the speakers are women. More than that, though, I want to know what happened between 2004 and 2006 that turned Wikipedia from gender-balanced to gender-imbalanced. Glancing at the gender distribution of contributors who list themselves on Wikipedia, it looks like the ratio is nearly equal (as of this writing, there are 77 women and 80 men). That only captures the people who bother to list their names and genders, however. Still, I want to know: Did something change? Or was it just that there were problems all along and the only change is that women are finally speaking out about them?
See more stories tagged with: feminism, wikipedia
Annalee Newitz (annalee@techsploitation.com) is a surly media nerd who thanks Laura Quilter for fighting to keep feminist science fiction in Wikipedia.
Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »
You've chosen to turn comments off for the entire site. Would you like to turn them back on?
Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.
Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.