Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

Wikipedia vs. Women

By Annalee Newitz, AlterNet. Posted December 19, 2006.


WikiChix was recently formed by women contributors sick of how male-dominated Wikipedia has become. The question their move raises is as old as feminism itself.

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

In Special Coverage

Belief:
Hot, Steamy Mormons: Are the Latter Day Saints Getting Sexy?
Liz Langley

Corporate Accountability and WorkPlace:
Banks Get into the Unemployment Biz, and Quickly Start the Rip-offs
Barbara Koeppel

DrugReporter:
Congress Gets Its Act Together: Repeals Ban on Syringe Exchange Funding, Allows D.C. to Enact Medical Marijuana Program
Bill Piper, Naomi Long

Environment:
Obama Addresses Copenhagen: 'There Is No Time to Waste'
Barack Obama

Food:
Does Aspartame Cause Tumors and Pose Cancer Risks? The Jury Is Still Out
Scott Thill

Health and Wellness:
And They'll Call This Health-Care Reform: How Three Senators Are Extorting You For Their Big-Time Buddies
Robert Reich

Immigration:
Immigration and the Salvation Army's War on Christmas
Refugio

Media and Technology:
Is Handwriting Going the Way of the Dodo?
Anne Trubek

Movie Mix:
Matt Damon and Morgan Freeman's Invictus Film Release Kicks Off New Campaign For Universal Declaration of Human Rights
Linda Milazzo

Politics:
Joe Lieberman's Former College Roommate on the Senator's Journey 'to the Dark Side'
Meg White

Reproductive Justice and Gender:
Can Boob Jobs Serve the Public Good?
Alexandra Suich

Rights and Liberties:
Always Controversial Cornel West Disses Obama, Survives Cancer and Almost Spent His Life in Prison
Terrence McNally

Sex and Relationships:
Guess What? Casual Sex Won't Make You Go Insane
Ellen Friedrichs

Take Action:
G-20 Meetings: Nothing Much Happened in the Suites, and There Was Too Much Punch in the Streets
Laura Flanders

Water:
NASA Report Highlights Need to Retire Drainage Impaired Land in California
Dan Bacher

World:
$57,077.60 -- That's What We're Paying Each Minute for the Occupation of Afghanistan
Jo Comerford

More stories by Annalee Newitz

Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

Two years ago tech entrepreneur Joi Ito was spending a lot of time with the managers and editors of the collaborative encyclopedia Wikipedia, and he noticed that there were far more women wikipedians than women bloggers. In late 2004, Ito wrote in his blog:

Wikipedia seems much more gender balanced than the blogging community ... I wonder what causes this difference in gender distribution? Is it that the power law aspect of blogs is inherently more competitive and appeals to the way men are "trained" in society? Or is it that we're just talking to the "head" of the blog curve and that the more interesting blogs are actually by women in "the long tail"? Or is it something about Wikipedia that attracts powerful women?
He received a handful of comments, almost entirely from men, which all boiled down to "I don't know" or "maybe women are just more collaborative." As far as I know, Ito never got any good answers to his questions.

But last month a group of women finally provided an unexpected rejoinder to Ito's long-ago musings. Dozens of long-term contributors to Wikipedia formed the WikiChix, a group modeled after the female-dominated Linux Chix. WikiChix, who of course have a wiki, say they are sick of how male-dominated Wikipedia has become.

One example of this problem, which isn't explicitly discussed on WikiChix, is the "feminist science fiction" entry on Wikipedia. All wikis like Wikipedia are web sites that can be modified by people browsing them. Contributors create an account, hit an edit button on any page, and then add their own information. Certain entries, however, get ensnared in "revision wars" -- battles between editors who keep changing information back and forth to reflect what they consider true. "Feminist science fiction" was one such entry.

Although this is a legitimate genre of science fiction and many famous SF writers such as Ursula K. Le Guin and Kim Stanley Robinson consider all or part of their work to be feminist, the entry was subject to such an intense revision war that at last administrators determined that it should be removed and replaced with "women in science fiction" in 2002. Obviously, "women in science fiction" is hardly the same thing as feminist science fiction, in the same way an entry on "operating systems" could hardly be said to replace an entry on "Linux." It wasn't until June of this year that the category "feminist science fiction" was created again, after a great deal of agitation.

As I said, this particular entry wasn't cited specifically by the WikiChix as their reason for creating the group. But many issues like this one led them to form a women-only wiki to discuss Wikipedia and wiki management more generally. The question their move raises is as old as feminism itself. Is it better for women to segregate themselves or stay in the male-dominated realm of Wikipedia and fight to be given an equal voice? In the WikiChix FAQ, the group writes to men who don't like the idea of separatism:
Instead of feeling excluded, try to see [WikiChix] as an opportunity to hear a conversation you would not hear otherwise. If men are not talking, what women say to each other becomes a different conversation. When we as women can stop defending ourselves and explaining that bias, sexism, or patriarchy exist, then we can move further in discussion and support of each other.
Is it really separatism if these women are posting in a public forum? I think not. They've simply created a public forum where all the speakers are women. More than that, though, I want to know what happened between 2004 and 2006 that turned Wikipedia from gender-balanced to gender-imbalanced. Glancing at the gender distribution of contributors who list themselves on Wikipedia, it looks like the ratio is nearly equal (as of this writing, there are 77 women and 80 men). That only captures the people who bother to list their names and genders, however. Still, I want to know: Did something change? Or was it just that there were problems all along and the only change is that women are finally speaking out about them?

Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: feminism, wikipedia

Annalee Newitz (annalee@techsploitation.com) is a surly media nerd who thanks Laura Quilter for fighting to keep feminist science fiction in Wikipedia.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

You've chosen to turn comments off for the entire site. Would you like to turn them back on?
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement