Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

Why Impeaching Bush Is Good for Our Species

By Robert Weitzel, Smirking Chimp. Posted December 21, 2006.


In his position as the Alpha Male, leader-of-the-pack, Bush may represent the vanguard of our species' future evolutionary development.

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

In Special Coverage

Belief:
Nobel Laureate Slams the Bible, Calls It "A Catalogue of Cruelties"
Mario de Queiroz

Corporate Accountability and WorkPlace:
As Foreclosure Nightmares Increase, Will More Homeowners Pay Off Their Bankers in Violence?
Scott Thill

DrugReporter:
Lies About Marijuana Drive People to a Much More Harmful Drug -- Booze
Steve Fox

Environment:
Why Max Baucus' 'No' Vote on the Climate Bill May Really Help Its Passage
Jeff Mcmahon

Food:
Despite Censorship By Beef Magnate, Michael Pollan Spreads Message About the Real Price of Cheap Food

Health and Wellness:
Do We Really Want to Enshrine Insurance Monopoly into Law? This and 5 Other Complaints About the Health Bill
John Nichols

Immigration:
NYC Marathon Raises Question of Who Is American Enough?
James E. Johnson, Jr.

Media and Technology:
How Biased Media Can Brainwash You
Melinda Burns

Movie Mix:
The Yes Men: Pranksters Out to Fix the World
Mark Engler

Politics:
4 Ways the Stupak Amendment Deprives Women of Access to Abortion
Jessica Arons

Reproductive Justice and Gender:
Fetus-Shaped Potatoes? Going Undercover Inside the Weird World of Right-Wing Abortion Foes
Ann Neumann

Rights and Liberties:
"My Kids Want to Hide Their Identity; They're Scared Someone Will Attack Us": U.S. Muslims Being Targeted
Jaisal Noor

Sex and Relationships:
Instant Sex: Has the Digital Age Destroyed Relationships or Made Them Better?
Vanessa Richmond

Take Action:
G-20 Meetings: Nothing Much Happened in the Suites, and There Was Too Much Punch in the Streets
Laura Flanders

Water:
Why Natural Gas Is Not a Clean Energy Panacea
Stan Cox

World:
With Unemployment at 40 Percent, Afghan Teens Enlist in Army, Police
Lal Aqa Sherin

More stories by Robert Weitzel

Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

In congresswoman Cynthia McKinney's recently filed Articles Of Impeachment Against President George W. Bush, a significant portion of Article 1 accurately describes his lying to justify a war that has already claimed hundreds of thousands of lives.

Okay, so nobody's perfect. But could Bush be the "best" our species has to offer at this moment? What I mean to say here is that he may well represent the vanguard of our species' future evolutionary development. This is a disturbing proposition. However, please rest assured that I will address the moral question it raises below (i.e., whether the evolutionary path that we apparently have chosen is the optimal path).

We're the only animal that is aware of its own intelligence, so we vainly call ourselves homo sapiens (Latin for "wise man" or, as we Americans would say, "wise guy"). Admittedly, we've done pretty well since the wheel. But should we ever stop congratulating ourselves and remove our blinders, the equally characteristic, though less laudable, devious side of our nature would be revealed.

Relax! We humans come by this Dark Side naturally. Being the only primate species with concealed ovulation, we are literally conceived in deception. And our apprenticeship in artifice begins with our first breath.

Consider how much time we spend deceiving or being deceived.

I don't just mean out-and-out lying. I mean deceptions by exaggeration and omission, by facial expression and body language; deceptions that are meant to either spare feelings or exploit them. Think, "Great dress, honey. I love the chartreuse and the sparkly stuff."

Ask yourself this: If our species is not predisposed by evolution to be both deceptive and gullible in equal proportions, how is it that we are so completely susceptible to propaganda, photo-op rhetoric, televangelists and backseat affirmations of love?

Very "wise guys" make up these lies and we believe them because it's easier than trying to figure out why we shouldn't (i.e., because we lack critical-reasoning skills). So, given our species' proclivity for deception, a more fitting Latin nickname might be homo sapiens fallaxcis ("wise guy who lies").

Although we often practice deception, most of us approach deception skills in much the same fashion as we do muscle tone -- developing just enough to allow us to get by.

However, George W. Bush belongs to that peculiar breed of homo sapiens fallaxcis that has, with notable exceptions, developed its evolutionary predisposition for deception to Charles Atlas proportions. To stand out amongst this breed -- charitably referred to as "politicians" -- one needs the advantages of both nature and nurture, of genetics and environment.

Anyone who knows the history of George W. Bush's meteoric rise to the Oval Office will appreciate the role that nature and nurture has played. He was blessed with the genome of a successful political family. Hence, the Y-chromosome certainly wasn't the only piece of genetic information that Papa "Read My Lips" Bush passed on to him. You can also be certain that Papa Bush and his privileged buddies nurtured the current president through many of life's trials and setbacks.

In the law-of-the-jungle, survival-of-the-fittest world of national politics, George "We Will Be Honest With the American People" Bush has proven himself to be the Alpha Male in a pack of presidential prevaricators. He is, indeed, a World-Class Deceiver.

Recall the recent competition. Richard "I Am Not a Crook" Nixon was forced to resign because of a few falsehoods and a few real hoods. Then, in a sworn deposition during the Iran-Contra Affair, Ronald "My Heart and My Best Intentions Tell Me It's True, but the Facts and Evidence Tell Me It's Not" Reagan deceived no one but himself.

Finally, recall that William "I Did Not Have Sexual Relations With That Woman" Clinton endured an impeachment trial because of one little slip-of-the-tongue.

But we shouldn't judge George W. Bush's lies by contemporary presidential standards. After all, their evolutionary predisposition for deception was not augmented by the genes of a dad who was an ex-president, and a granddad who was an ex-senator. Like most of us, their dads and granddads were regular "wise guys" who were only middling fibbers.

But George W. Bush took full advantage of his evolutionary and familial endowments. He began lying to the American people with impunity from the day he announced his candidacy for president. And he hasn't stopped since.

Considering both the ease with which President Bush bamboozled most Americans into supporting an unjust-and-illegal war against Iraq, and their subsequent lack of outrage at this affront to their sapient selves, one has to wonder if our species has not arrived at one of those telling evolutionary moments?

Ten thousand generations hence, might not they use the Bush Y-chromosome as their genetic marker to signal a crucial turning point in the evolution of homo sapiens fallaxcis, the fateful point where our generation foolishly chose to protect that which makes us fallaxcis at the expense of that which makes us sapiens, and we branched off into the genus homo fallaxcis? Ecce homo fallaxcis! Behold deceitful man!

However, if we follow congresswoman McKinney's lead, and impeach this World Class Deceiver for his lies and their dire consequences, we might send a signal to future generations that we consciously sought a different, far wiser evolutionary path.

Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: impeachment, george w. bush

Robert Weitzel lives in Middleton, WI. His essays regularly appear in the Capital Times of Madison, WI. He has also been published in the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, Skeptic magazine, Freethought Today and on the websites SmirkingChimp.com and CommonDreams.org. He can be contacted at: rweitz@tds.net.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
homo sociopathus
Posted by: jessicalh on Dec 21, 2006 12:37 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There was a recent study indicating a phenotypic difference in pathological liar's brains, so clearly its already in the population at a rate of 10 to 20 percent, if the study is correct. While obviously this is fairly new ground, one could argue on the face of it that its likely to be a fairly old and consistent set of traits. What we need to create homo sociopathus is adaptive radiation, in the evolutionary sense. Its probably too complex to breed on simple mendalian lines, but lets find out by putting them all on an island together.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Fascinating study Posted by: danielgeery
» A better interpretation Posted by: Bic Pentameter
McKinney
Posted by: rsaxto on Dec 21, 2006 12:55 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Cynthia McKinney's articles of impeachment are superb. She is ten times smarter and ten times more moral than the W. If her efforts do not bear fruit it will only be because the Congress is loaded to the gills with criminally-oriented dingbats who the people should discard asap.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: McKinney Posted by: Conservasaurus
» RE: McKinney Posted by: NowYogi
» RE: McKinney Posted by: joe2171
» RE: McKinney Posted by: Conservasaurus
» RE: McKinney Posted by: Democritus
One leader does not evolution make
Posted by: Logic's Edge on Dec 21, 2006 1:33 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Our evolutionary future will be dictated by who lives and procreates, and who doesn't. Not by who makes the biggest noise while alive.

How many children does Dubya have? How many do that whole lot in Washington typically have? Barely replacement rate, if that. They may be successful at gathering power and wealth, but it's not helping them in the reproduction department.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

LIAR
Posted by: sasquuatch55 on Dec 21, 2006 4:51 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I wonder if King George W. lied to his mama to the degree he lies to us?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: LIAR Posted by: NowYogi
» EXACTLY! Posted by: Cathyc
» RE: LIAR Posted by: Artkansas
Don't Focus on Bush!
Posted by: xi_people on Dec 21, 2006 4:54 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Bush isn't "deciding" one damn thing. His marching orders are coming from people behind the scenes that are higher up on the hierarchy then himself, or Cheney. Bush is a figurehead, nothing more.

This is why I find articles like this disturbing, because by placing so much emphasis on Bush the main point is being missed -- he is NOT the reason for the mess that this country is in. His only function is to act as a perfect foil for all of the national bile that the insane policies of the past six years have engendered. Its much too easy to put Bush down as an incompetent fool, and chalk up the decisions being made to idiocy. But that would be missing the entire point.

Bush is still in power because the policies are supported by a solid majority of the ruling elite. If this wasn't the case, he would have been gone -- by any means necessary -- long ago. So, this isn't just some crackpot determined to "solidify his legacy" or some of the other stupid reasons given, the policy decisions being made are by very powerful, highly intelligent people who don't mind committing genocide to accomplish their aims. I find that aspect chilling.

Its much more comforting to think that its all on Bush's shoulders, and that by impeaching him, somehow things will be made better. That is where the trap lies, because the for the real decision-makers it doesn't matter who the figurehead in charge is -- their plans are going forward no matter what. Wait until you see the so-called "reformist" dimocraps in action next year. For all the muted noises they're making about the current sorry state of affairs, nothing substantive will be done to ameliorate the situation.

In short, the multitude of problems facing this country are far, far deeper than one imbecilic, feckless, figurehead president. Failing to recognize that, and wasting time railing against Bush, is going to prove to be a fatal mistake.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Well thought out... Posted by: ShrubtheWarcriminal
» RE: Well thought out... Posted by: Democritus
» RE: Well thought out... Posted by: drmflorida
» RE: Don't Focus on Bush! Posted by: Gregbaugher
Bush is a born liar - and thief and elitist
Posted by: LMNOP on Dec 21, 2006 5:46 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"However, George W. Bush belongs to that peculiar breed of homo sapiens fallaxcis that has ... developed its evolutionary predisposition for deception to Charles Atlas proportions. ... this breed -- charitably referred to as "politicians""

Sure George Bush is a colossal liar, but not because he is a politician. It is because he was born and raised into elitism.

Elites, those movers and shakers who broker the power and wealth of society, don't live by the rules that they promulgate for the suckers and pretend to respect themselves: tell the truth, don't steal, be kind and forgiving, work hard, believe in God and go to church, etc.

I can hear George Sr. telling Jr. that one should never tell the truth unless the truth will give a better outcome than any lie. That one should steal all that one can. I can hear him saying that soldiers are toys that we deploy for profit, and that morality is for suckers.

Not that these aren't implicit American values all the way down to the lower middle class - we all give lip service to honesty and family and whatever, but that's it, just lip service. But with the lions, there is not even the pretense among themselves that they should or do live by the rules that we suckers assume all people aspire to even if some cannot comply.

The elite don't fail to meet the moral standards they advocate for the rest: they reject them as suckers' rules and have their own that would frighten and sicken you. I believe that they are candid about that amongst themselves.

Being a liar and a thief in Bush's case does not come from being a politician. It comes from being born into one of the Brahman families that teaches lying and stealing as a way of life.

Not surprisingly, this perverse environment breeds anti-social tendencies which we might label as a mental illness (anti-social personality disorder), but that implies that his parents didn't intend for him to be that way - that he is somehow inadvertently damaged goods.

You and I might consider this way of life a perversion of mental health, but it's no accident and nobody in that rarefied atmosphere sees it as a problem or is trying to "fix" it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

SmirkingChimp
Posted by: Conservasaurus on Dec 21, 2006 5:50 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I was awaiting these charges as to why Bush should be impeached??.. non ever appeared? He lied? ok.. i hear that alot - but where were the lies?..apparently the author doesn't know what the lies were. Is he confusing foreign policy decisions and faulty intel with lies??

He just doesn't like Bush so figures he should be impeached?

If one is to write an article making a claim such as that and call for impeachment I would suspect he would have facts backing up his claim... SmirkingChimp - how appropriate!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» LOL Posted by: LMNOP
» RE: LOL Posted by: joe2171
» RE: LOL Posted by: LMNOP
» RE: LOL Posted by: drmflorida
» RE: LOL Posted by: Conservasaurus
» RE: LOL Posted by: Conservasaurus
» RE: LOL Posted by: madmac10
» RE: LOL Posted by: Conservasaurus
» RE: LOL Posted by: LMNOP
» And it never will... Posted by: LMNOP
» RE: LOL Posted by: LMNOP
» RE: LOL Posted by: Conservasaurus
» RE: LOL - ConservaTroll truths Posted by: Uncle Crabby
» RE: LOL - ConservaTroll truths Posted by: Conservasaurus
» Clinton re Monica Posted by: Iconoclast421
» RE: LOL is right but here it is... Posted by: ShrubtheWarcriminal
» RE: LOL is right but here it is... Posted by: Conservasaurus
» Thanks, Uncle Crabby Posted by: Beck
» arrogant snob and real people Posted by: Conservasaurus
Impeachment? So What!!! Come on, people!!!
Posted by: zooeyhall on Dec 21, 2006 7:15 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I wish the progressive community would stop this noise about impeaching Bush. I mean, for cryin' out loud, it has about a snowball's chance in hell of succeeding. What a waste of time and effort!

Do you think the political Establishment and the corporate powers-to-be would ever let such a thing even remotely come close to happening?

Let's spend our energy on other, more practical ways to forward the Progressive cause. This is wacko idea that seems to obsess a small element of the Progressive community. All it does is harm the general image of Progressives among the rest of the country.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: I agree, impeachment is to nice... Posted by: ShrubtheWarcriminal
» RE: Impeachment? PEOPLE LIKE YOU Posted by: sasquuatch55
concealed ovulation & immaculate deception
Posted by: Iconoclast421 on Dec 21, 2006 7:26 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As the author said, we are the only species that is aware of its own intelligence. Women can not conceal their ovulation, because man is aware of Time. And time says that if she bleeds today then she ovulates 10 days later. A woman's cycle is really only concealed from a man who either does not know her, or is very stupid. That is a survival trait, and it is a good one.

To compare that to Bush in any way is kind of insulting. Bush is not a result of any kind of instinctual "immaculate deception". He did not come to power because we love to be lied to. Bush is more like a rat that appears when you leave food laying around on the floor for a long time. Bush happens when people fail to clean house! Until we do clean house, the rats will get bigger and bigger.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Homo Degenerates
Posted by: haleema on Dec 21, 2006 7:36 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Cynthia is one of the best of us, thats why they kicked her butt outta 'dere (wise guy vernacular). These criminals are harbouring memories of days in the cave (No Light). Their brains were not fully developed...or maybe some kind of latent brain virus...They are all Devils !

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

2 pieces to this puzzle.
Posted by: CMaciolek on Dec 21, 2006 8:25 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There are actually two parts to evolution; survival and reproduction. Men act in their simple minded way to survive, and then women chose their mates based on the mans ability to survive. Being an Alpha-male is pointless in evolutionary terms if the environment changes and they cannot survive. Evolution is not measured by the individual, it is measured by the environment. And, since we are the politicians environment - if we changed, they would not be able to survive. (or something like that.)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: 2 pieces to this puzzle. Posted by: Richard Dudgeon
» RE: 2 pieces to this puzzle - simplified Posted by: MartianBachelor
Ofari's Failed Logic
Posted by: elisabeth on Dec 21, 2006 8:49 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Recently, an article was posted that said that McKinney's motivation to impeach Bush was derived more to spite democrats and from her "near clinical hatred" of Pelosi. What he fails to mention is that the result of such an impeachment of Bush, Cheney and Rice would put Pelosi as President. So, if she "hates" Pelosi so much, why would she propose to make her President. Seems Ofari's logic ignores the obvious and wants us to think impeachment is not in our best interest when clearly, it is the only way to stop Bush and his escalation of the war. We have to send a clear message that what they did was wrong and they are not above the law.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

McKinney Nails It Right On the Head with a Well-Deserved Whack!
Posted by: philobat on Dec 21, 2006 9:37 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
McKinney via the keyboard and an auspicious and brilliant observance has given us all the ammo we need to to impeach that sonofabitch George W. Bush. In a vain attempt to label Bush, such descriptions have come to mind and have appeared in various articles and blogs such as; Pathological, Sociopath and many others.

What came to my mind was a scene from "Silence of the Lambs" when Jodi Foster is having a discussion about what to call Dr. Hannibal Lector and she says, "We don't have a name for what he is" then the screen dissolves to her in the office with Dr. Chilton who says, "Oh, he's a monster... So rare to catch one alive these days"

Yes, George Bush is a self elected monster and one of the most gruesome, evil, greedy, didactic-wolf-in-sheeps-clothing blame mongering coward our White House has ever seen. He is far too stupid to be the last anti-christ (if you believe in that sort of thing), but Bush is useful enough to be a rung on the Devil's ladder.

He should receive more than impeachment. He and his cronies and terrorist profiteers should be imprisioned for life and his name removed from all the history books and referred to only as; the Evil Idiot who stained America.

Now, break out the bleach, and scrub the stain America..SCRUB SCRUB SCRUB!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Truth+Acceptance=Action
Posted by: mite on Dec 21, 2006 11:27 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We continue the same old Sound-Bites, Media/Press propaganda, and refuse to research the truth, lord knows we very seldom find it on the TV, or in Newspapers or magazines.

The truth is: The Federal Reserve, IRS, IMF, and World Banks.

www.freedomtofascism.com www.devvy.com

search Google freedomtofascism to view for free, but support our patriots.

Our Congress could Impeach Bush and Cheney and not (1) one thing would change. We must REPEAL the Federal Reserve Act of December 23, 1913 and 16th Amendment (A Fraud- Never Ratified by the States). Article 1 Sec: 8

www.givemeliberty.org Bill Of Rights Amendment 1- ...right to redress grievances...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Bush? Wolrd Class Deciever?
Posted by: Ghoulman on Dec 21, 2006 12:43 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
He is, indeed, a World-Class Deceiver.

Funny article, but really, only Americans (living in thier media bubble) were fooled about Iraq. The rest of the world was shocked by Bush's obvious lies.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Bush? Wolrd Class Deciever? Posted by: unitedstatesofstupidity
» RE: Bush? Wolrd Class Deciever? Posted by: willymack
» Alex I'll take LEFTY LOONS for 2 francs Posted by: cheneybush2008
George W Bush is NOT representative of the human species!
Posted by: Cathyc on Dec 21, 2006 12:46 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
He is merely representative of the American people and culture. And he did not fool ALL of the people with his lies, just those who survive by fooling themselves on a daily basis!

As for our covert ovulation: this must surely by typical of Americans and other dimwits around the world, it certainly is not the case that ovulation is hidden - in healthy women (like myself) that is!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

KUCINICH 2008 SPITZER 2012 FOR PREZ
Posted by: sasquuatch55 on Dec 21, 2006 3:06 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
KUCINICH 2008 SPITZER 2012

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

kinda of irrelevant, but...
Posted by: CarolineRF on Dec 21, 2006 4:50 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
actually 32 primate species have concealed ovulation. we used to think we were special, but we're not. menopause is a much rarer phenomenon.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

POODLES @ BAD THEATRE DC
Posted by: Hal on Dec 22, 2006 12:24 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As others here have said, global village idiot GW Bush is the most transparent puppet that has ever warmed a seat at the oval office. Seriously enough – this twitchy clod can barely read his lines from a teleprompter. Possibly the only real decisions “the decider” makes are off the White House menu.

The real power that presidents and prime ministers identified, as a Gilded Age “Invisible Government” is what pulls the strings at the bad theatre that is Washington and its carnival-barking whore of an MSM.

If you want to know who rules behind the mask of a phony free market democracy and faux capitalist system look no farther than to those that print counterfeit money out of thin air in trade for real work, debt and interest. An unconstitutional “Federal Reserve” Corporation that’s not federal and vacant of any reserves outside of a Ponzi extortion swindle is what runs the brothel-casino at DC and the west. And it has since the dead of winter 1913 when it and then the IRS were foisted onto the world in the name of “reform” and “regulation”.

A parasite class that pulls the strings on lapdog politicians from 10 Downing to Washington brings an old Baudelaire prose poem to mind:

"The smartest thing the devil ever did was to convince people he didn't exist..."

Freedom to Fascism

Griffin on the Federal Reserve Con 1

Griffin on the Federal Reserve Con 2

Federal Reserve by E. Mullins

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Impeachment Good for Republicans and Democrats
Posted by: Jodin on Dec 25, 2006 9:35 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Impeachment Good for Republicans and Democrats

A debate is raging as to whether the U.S. should impeach George W. Bush, but it’s not a partisan debate. Democrats and Republicans fall on both sides of the issue. Members of both parties opposing impeachment seem to be worried that pursuing impeachment will hurt their chances in the 2008 presidential elections and beyond. Given that the argument seems to be turning on whether impeachment is good for winning elections, it seems odd that so many members of both parties are in agreement about opposing it. Obviously, one of the parties will get a political bump.

While few reasonable people can doubt that Bush has done more than enough to warrant impeachment from a constitutional perspective, it looks like some Democrats and Republicans won’t be motivated to impeach until they can see why it’s good for their political futures. Therefore I'm going to put aside the fact that holding Bush accountable for his numerous crimes is the ethical thing to do. I’m also going to put aside the way impeachment massively increases the chance of Congress undoing his rubberstamped legislative damage, and that impeachment is the only way to deter future presidents from continuing from where Bush leaves off. That’s right — even ignoring all this, impeachment is still a good idea, and for both parties.

Democrats, up until now, you've had a Republican majority in the Congress. When people criticized the government, you could claim with some credibility that there was nothing you could do about it. But now you have both houses of Congress. The people voted to put you in office in good measure not because your party expressed a coherent and positive vision for America’s future, but because they were concerned about the overwhelming amount of government corruption that’s been going on under Republican control. If you fail to hold this president accountable now, you're out of excuses. People will look back and say that both parties were complicit, corrupt, and opportunistic — and they'll be right. You only maintain the moral high ground if you defend the Constitution in contrast to the Republican controlled Congress. Members of Congress, it might be good to remember that this was the oath you swore to when you took office. If you fail in this, the public will see you as no different from those you replaced, and you will lose your precious elections. Ten years from now, when your child asks you what you did to stop Bush's systematic destruction of the foundations of our democracy, you'll have to say, "Well, nothing, honey. We had an election to win." Actually, you may want to make sure you tell them in person, to avoid the wiretap surveillance.

And Republicans, you're like the football coach who pridefully refuses to pull a player off the field after everyone else can plainly see the need. The sooner you pull the man, the more highly respected you'll be. The longer you wait, the more you tie your party's future to the corruption and incompetence that has already been attributed to this administration.

If we look to history, we find that elections subsequent to presidential impeachment have consistently favored parties that have pursued impeachment. So whether you’re a Republican or a Democrat, it’s time to join together on impeachment. All who do will reap the spoils. Those who do not will be subject to the judgment of history.

Jodin Morey
D. Larkin Corvin
http://ImpeachForPeace.org

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

BUSH IS GOOD FOR OUR SPECIES
Posted by: pfm on Dec 26, 2006 9:26 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There are a number of times when I have called into question whether "W" is actully a member of our species .........?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Comrade McKinky's Lost Legacy of Lost DNC Quotes...
Posted by: cheneybush2008 on Dec 28, 2006 10:06 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"We are in possession of what I think to be compelling evidence that Saddam Hussein has, and has had for a number of years, a developing capacity for the production and storage of weapons of mass destruction. ...without question, we need to disarm Saddam Hussein. He is a brutal, murderous dictator, leading an oppressive regime ... He presents a particularly grievous threat because he is so consistently prone to miscalculation. And now he has continued deceit and his consistent grasp for weapons of mass destruction ... So the threat of Saddam Hussein with weapons of mass destruction is real ... " “I will be voting to give the president of the United States the authority to use force - if necessary - to disarm Saddam Hussein because I believe that a deadly arsenal of weapons of mass destruction in his hands is a real and grave threat to our security." SENATOR JOHN F KERRY (D, MA), in 2003

"We have known for many years that Saddam Hussein is seeking and developing weapons of mass destruction."SENATOR TED KENNEDY (D, MA), in 2002

"As a member of the House Intelligence Committee, I am keenly aware that the proliferation of chemical and biological weapons is an issue of grave importance to all nations. Saddam Hussein has been engaged in the development of weapons of mass destruction technology which is a threat to countries in the region and he has made a mockery of the weapons inspection process." – NANCY PELOSI, in 1998

"Iraq does pose a serious threat to the stability of the Persian Gulf and we should organize an international coalition to eliminate his access to weapons of mass destruction. Iraq's search for weapons of mass destruction has proven impossible to completely deter and we should assume that it will continue for as long as Saddam is in power." – AL GORE, in 2002

"In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program. He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including al Qaeda members .. It is clear, however, that if left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical warfare and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons." - Sen. Hillary Clinton (D, NY), in 2002

"Iraq is a long way from [here], but what happens there matters a great deal here. For the risks that the leaders of a rogue state will use nuclear, chemical or biological weapons against us or our allies is the greatest security threat we face." - Madeline Albright, in 1998

"Hussein has ... chosen to spend his money on building weapons of mass destruction and palaces for his cronies." - Madeline Albright, Clinton Secretary of State, in 1999

"He will use those weapons of mass destruction again, as he has ten times since 1983." - Sandy Berger, Clinton National Security Adviser, in 1998

"The community of nations may see more and more of the very kind of threat Iraq poses now: a rogue state with weapons of mass destruction, ready to use them or provide them to terrorists. If we fail to respond today, Saddam and all those who would follow in his footsteps will be emboldened tomorrow." – BILL CLINTON, in 1998

Maybe old paranoid, race baiting battle babe Cynthia will find these at her new job folding sweaters at The Gap?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Impeaching Bush
Posted by: marrieah on Dec 31, 2006 6:56 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The problem with Bush is that he started believing his own BS.
And yes he should be impeached... big time.
Bush has shown that he is a big time rich coward who cheated himself into the presidency so that he could gain control of our US military for personal intents. Now that Saddam is no longer with us, who will he now use. The guy in North Korea is even more mental than Bush, so he is off limit, and the one in Iran has ties to the present 'leaders' of Iraq where many in our military are based, so do he dare piss him off.
Not only did he lie about those infamous WMDs, there is also and will always be that incredious timing of the WTC disaster that gave him the ammo need to presuade the American people to back him in this idiotic scheme. And by the way, where is Osama?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement