Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

More Dangerous Than Smoking? Death by Soda

By Joshua Frank, AlterNet. Posted December 27, 2006.


Drinking one soda a day could cause you to gain 15 pounds a year. Other related health risks include type 2 diabetes, heart disease, bowel cancer and nerve damage.

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

More stories by Joshua Frank

Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

This article has appeared previously on counterpunch.org and countercurrents.org.

We are a country of overweight people. Americans are tipping the scales in record numbers, with approximately 130 million who are presently considered overweight or obese. Perhaps most alarmingly of all, half of all women aged 20 to 39 in the United States are included in these figures. Many factors contribute to the growing problem, from our sedentary lifestyles to our overindulgence in high-energy, low nutritional foods. Dealing with the crisis is not easy. The marketing of energy dense foods is a multi-billion dollar industry, and manufacturers of such products go to great lengths to ensure their shareholders continue to profit from the sales of nutrition-less foods.

Despite the barrage of marketing to the contrary, sales pitches, and misinformation, consumption of soda has been directly linked to both obesity as well as type 2 diabetes. Soft drinks are packed full of sugar and refined carbohydrates, both of which are undeniably correlated to these factors. Type 2 diabetes is also associated with a poor diet that is laden with high-fructose corn syrup and low in fiber. Research indicates that soft drinks largely contribute to this growing epidemic, with high school and college age kids being the most likely to consume sugar laden soda beverages on a regular basis.

Sugar-sweetened beverages (SSBs) are bad news, according to health experts, because they contribute to the obesity epidemic by providing empty calories, that is, calories that provide little or no nutritional value. Meaning, a person who slugs down too much soda is swallowing more than their body can handle. And this added energy isn't healthy energy -- it's energy derived from high-fructose corn syrup (HFCS), i.e., highly refined sugar that has been chemically processed in order to excite your taste buds. It has been argued that too much HFCS in one's diet may offset the intake of solid food, yet does not produce a positive caloric balance. In turn, this over-consumption contributes to the slow development of obesity because the person is consuming more calories than their body can burn. And these days, people are drinking more soda than ever before. Perhaps not surprisingly, as portion sizes for soft drinks have increased, so have American waistlines.

Too put this dangerous pattern in to perspective, one regular 12-ounce can of sugar-sweetened soda contains approximately 150 calories with close to 50 grams of sugar. If this is added to the typical American diet, one can of soda per day could lead to a weight gain of 15 pounds in one year. Currently the consumption of soda accounts for about 8%-9% of total energy among children and adults, and studies suggest that it is most certainly having a negative effect on the people who consume it in such vast quantities. So what's so wrong with being overweight then, you ask? So what if soda has been linked to causing obesity? What's wrong with that? Well, plenty say scores of medical, health and public nutrition experts.

For starters, obesity increases the risk of type 2 diabetes, heart disease, bowel cancer as well as high blood pressure. Type 2 diabetes alone can contribute to cardiovascular disease, retinopathy (blindness), neuropathy (nerve damage), nephropathy (kidney damage), and other health complications. So if type 2 diabetes is highly associated with individuals who are obese, and obesity is linked to SSBs, then type 2 diabetes is highly associated with the consumption of SSBs because the consumption of SSBs is so highly associated with causing obesity. In short, if one consumes SSBs on a regular basis, they are more at risk of developing type 2 diabetes, which itself may cause many ailments. That's why being overweight is not a good thing for one's health. And that's why drinking copious amounts of sugar-sweetened beverages contributes to poor wellbeing byway of obesity and type 2 diabetes.


Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: coke, soda, vending machines, obesity

Joshua Frank is the author of Left Out! How Liberals Helped Reelect George W. Bush and edits http://www.BrickBurner.org.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Two Words
Posted by: NoPCZone on Dec 27, 2006 12:04 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Diet Coke

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Two Words Posted by: mwildfire
» RE: Two Words Posted by: Gisele
» RE: Two Words Posted by: Mamarianne
» RE: Two Words Posted by: crusty
» RE: Two Words Posted by: willymack
» RE: Three Words Posted by: jmooney
» Better Choice Posted by: dfaye
» RE: Better Choice Posted by: specom
caring
Posted by: rsaxto on Dec 27, 2006 12:36 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If we had a smart, decent and caring society no one would be drinking pop or smoking cigarettes. Instead we have a dumb, greedy and destructive society proceeding toward more disease and more disaster and more brainwashing. Until we smarten up our future is nil.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Coke Kills Black People Posted by: edith
» RE: Coke Kills Black People Posted by: bookie
» Get a GRIP Posted by: CardiacRN
» RE: Get a GRIP Posted by: jmooney
» RE: Coke Kills Black People Posted by: gaiaschild94
» RE: caring Posted by: rue
» RE: caring Posted by: jmooney
» RE: caring Posted by: Conservasaurus
» YIKES! Caring ≠ State Control Posted by: supercrisp
SUPER-SIZE ME!
Posted by: Tom Degan on Dec 27, 2006 2:48 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
How fortuitous! This saturday at 9:00 PM (Eastern Time), MSNBC will be airing the groundbreaking documentary, Super-Size Me. I have seen this film twice and highly recommend it. The film's creator (whose name escapes me at the moment - forgive me), a health food devotee, decided to live on junk/fast food for a period of a few months. The film is a chronology of the decline in his health.

Don't miss this one.

Tom Degan
Goshen, NY
"The Rant" by Tom Degan

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» MORGAN SPURLOCK! Posted by: Tom Degan
» RE: MORGAN SPURLOCK! Posted by: Ruby
» RE: MORGAN SPURLOCK! Posted by: jmooney
Replace sugar with Rumsfeld's "nutrasweet" for a double K.O...
Posted by: xbj on Dec 27, 2006 3:26 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Think diet sodas are the answer? Guess again.

No less than Oberfuhrer Rumsfeld's little gift to the world, nutrasweet, MAKES AN EXCELLENT ANT POISON. AS IF the Torturer didn't know...

Splenda? Sugar that's been CHLORINATED... do a search on chloracne.

Back to saccharin? You'd have to drink bathtubs of the stuff to get cancer... but that doesn't get rid the phsophoric acid that eats your bones.

Tea? With Sweet & Low liquid, probably the best bet.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Sugar is not the enemy Posted by: electricmonk
» RE: Sugar is not the enemy Posted by: bornxeyed
» RE: Sugar is not the enemy Posted by: electricmonk
» ant poison shmant poison Posted by: medstudgeek
Well, what do you expect? Of course the DEA would much rather not ban soda.
Posted by: maxpayne on Dec 27, 2006 4:36 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Like any other common poison, soda's here to stay. The problem is bad government pimping with Corporate America. Perhaps Mr. Holland might want to take Framing 101 as the article looks too stuffed to a lot of average Joes and Janes. Look, I congradulate Holland for exposing soda's real breakdown but all this is nothing more than reacting and playing on the defensive. Sure soda's bad and it's got more unhealthy drugs and chemicals than it used to but I'd like to see Mr. Holland go on the offensive and give us his alternatives to soda worth considering.

P.S.: A good medicine that would nip Corporate America in the bud is likely to be banned by the DEA whereas common poisons such as soda, tobacco, alcohol, viagra, happy meals, etc ... will not be restricted whatsoever. After all, the corporate media wants its fucked up "economy" to stay until eternity whether we like it or not.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

WOOOT!!!!!
Posted by: paschn on Dec 27, 2006 4:47 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
except for one, look closely at the responses to the article. VERY smart answers! And do you think those obviously well informed answers would be there without NET NEUTRALITY?
If you think the corporate media is responsible for the well informed folks that responded here, think again!
WE MUST fight to not only keep the corporate cuckolds like McCain from giving it over to the same fate that Reagan sentenced our sources for information, ( jokingly referred to as Journalists), to but we need to PUSH for the same access to it that many "lesser" countries have been doing for years. Net access provided by municipalites.
And to that end, you might want to begin researching and EDUCATING your friends who think that doughy McCain is some kind of hero. Or sure as hell he'll slither into the whitehouse and make political prostitution a national past-time. Oops,..it already IS. But rest assured McCain et al will make it even worse, if that's possible.
A nation of sheep, led by a cartel of whores, controlled by big business. Welcome to the REAL Evil Empire.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: WOOOT!!!!! Posted by: madmac10
another pespective
Posted by: ellie on Dec 27, 2006 4:56 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
let's stroll through the grocery store shall we???

store brand pop, 2 liter, $.59... water 2 liter, $1.18, milk $3.00 per gallon, juices $2.00 per liter and on up... tap water you say, well, they found benzine and PCB's in our local tap water a few years ago... would you drink benzine???

carb heavy food is satisfying and cheap... mac and cheese less then $1.00, head of lettuce $2.00 and up, not to mention such things as e coli runoff water from commercial livestock finishing pens contaminating organic produce fields, remember???

when sugar and carbs are cheaper then real food and you have $x.00 to feed your family, guess which one wins

rent in areas that have a single blade of grass are beyond the reach of over half of the american families so kids can't get out and run around like we all did when we were kids, so exercise is limited...

what this article is really saying from my read, is that the american people have had real food and a healthier lifestyle placed beyond the wallet... we can talk all we want about toxic foods, but for the vast majority of families, what are the options???

btw, notice that a huge amount of the fast food places are in 'low rent' areas??? a happy meal is about $3.00, can you feed a child a solid meal of salad, milk, veggies, a protein and a small carb for that kind of money??? we are talking a good $5.00 to just get the groceries IF there is a grocery store nearby you can walk to and I don't mean the local c-store that is forced to pay high wholesale prices because they are a corporate 'risk' to the wholesaler...

I can go on and on here...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: another pespective Posted by: mwildfire
» RE: another pespective Posted by: crusty
» You know what... Posted by: mmeetoilenoir
» RE: You know what... Posted by: crusty
» Blame game Posted by: Hardcore Hopeful
» RE: another pespective Posted by: Sushi
PERSONAL RESPONSIBILITY
Posted by: SekhmetsatRa on Dec 27, 2006 6:20 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
get rid of the nanny. take responsibility for yourself. if you eat high calorie foods, freakin EXCERCISE!!!!!!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

If I gain 15 pounds a year from a daily soda......
Posted by: crusty on Dec 27, 2006 6:23 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I will pass the 600 pound mark this year.....I cannot wait! Thats awesome. After all... fat is flavor.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Alternatives to Soda
Posted by: Kossack on Dec 27, 2006 6:34 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
While Ellie makes an excellent and valid point about the increasing socio-economic stratification of good food, water, and air in America today, I would like to respond to MaxPayne's challenge to "go on the offensive" by offering "alternatives to soda worth considering."
Knowing what I know about cooking and botany, I wouldn't consider putting soda in my body due to the putrid taste as much as to the lack of nutrition in the stuff. And while eating healthily does often require a "capital advance" (buying a pot and a jug of olive oil to cook your lentils and brown rice -- or a ceramic mug and a mesh tea ball to make your tea, for example), at the end of the day it is more cost-effective than eating poorly and getting sick.

Healthy, Tasty, Economically Accessible Alternatives to Soda:
* Peppermint-spearmint-ginger tea. Helps with heartburn, motion sickness, and morning sickness. With a touch of honey or no sweetener at all.
* Raspberry leaf, fennel, blessed thistle, with citrus and honey to taste. Rich in phytoestrogens, especially good for women.
* Anise, fenugreek, cumin, fennel, red clover, with citrus and honey to taste. Very rich in phytoestrogens -- good for teenage girls worried about looking feminine and grown-up (it makes your breasts a little bigger).
* Bay leaves, elderberries, bilberries, olive leaves, melissa, raspberry leaves, peppermint, rose hips, cumin, oregano, cardamom, ginger, cinnamon, cloves, and a pinch of licorice root powder, with loads of lime and a touch of honey. Helps with migraine/headaches, body aches, colds oncoming and arrived.

I know it can be hard to get what you need when you don't have money, but human beings are wiley and adapable creatures. Herbs are cheap and go on sale, water is free, and if you want to read fantastic books to put together your own alternatives to soda with these tools, you can ask your local library to order them. Most public and university libraries delegate ordering to a person or group of people -- and it's their job to listen to you declare your deep and abiding need for James Duke's *The Green Pharmacy* or Susan Weed's *Wise Woman Herbal for the Childbearing Year*.

And then there's always chocolate milk.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Alternatives to Soda Posted by: henderson
» RE: Alternatives to Soda Posted by: Kossack
» mothewart Posted by: edith
» RE: Alternatives to Soda Posted by: edith
» RE: Alternatives to Soda Posted by: Kossack
» Nevermind Kossack Posted by: WitchyNy
» Essentialize this. Posted by: edith
» your alternatives sound awful Posted by: thistleblower
» RE: Alternatives to Soda Posted by: smartlady
Simplistic Nonsense!!!!!
Posted by: Gravitas on Dec 27, 2006 6:53 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Sorry, there is no other way to put it! As a sociologist whose specialty is understanding the social pathology of weight obsession, the opening paragraph is full of unfounded information. The "obesity epidemic" is a marketing scheme of the pharmaceuticals. If the author had any research ability at all, he could follow the money and see that BigPharma is behind all the scare campaigns. Furthermore, the only reason so many people are classified as "overweight" is because they lowered the weight standards a few years ago, ignoring sound scientific studies that say the best weights are above what is currently recommended. (But not as profitable for BigDiet/Pharma!)

I am not going to even talk about the fact obesity has not been proven to cause diabetes, because it is clear from the article the author will not be capable of understanding cause and effect! (I am a college instructor, and some people just don't, won't, and can't ehxibit those analytical skills!) What I will say is that this article is hurting fat people more than soda. Its simplistic reasoning helps spread myths about obesity as a lifestyle problem. It's exaggeration of the alleged health problems of obesity add to things like employment discrimination. The overall tone of hysteria makes people want to drop weight quickly, which leads to risky weight loss methods, which is one of the real reasons the fat suffer ill health problems. The willingness by the left to
abandon critical thinking and exploit the stigma of obesity as a convenient way to draw attention to one's cause sickens me. It is no different than the Bush administration exploiting the cause of democracy for its unjust war on Iraq.


"Weight obsession is a social disease. If we cared more about CO2 than BMI there would stilll be time."

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Simplistic Nonsense!!!!! Posted by: Kossack
» Sorry, pal Posted by: CardiacRN
» RE: Sorry, lady Posted by: JCR
» RE: Sorry, lady Posted by: CardiacRN
» RE: Simplistic Nonsense!!!!! Posted by: think123
Ummm....
Posted by: davcrock on Dec 27, 2006 7:04 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I average two or three sodas a day....

For most of my life I've been tall and skinny.

Why is this story on alternet????

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Ummm.... Posted by: Kossack
» RE: Ummm.... Posted by: davcrock
» Some people just get lucky Posted by: medstudgeek
» RE: Ummm.... Posted by: edith
» Mah great grand-pappy... Posted by: MatthewSavage
» RE: Mah great grand-pappy... Posted by: paxhumana
» Sarchasm Posted by: MatthewSavage
» I get it! Posted by: edith
» RE: Ummm.... Posted by: davcrock
» RE: Ummm.... Posted by: Ang
Lame
Posted by: richiedagger on Dec 27, 2006 7:19 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This story is pretty sad.

I've been, for better or worse, drinking soda for my entire life. I didn't put on 15 pounds a year. I did, however, start putting on weight once I got out of school and started leading a more sedentary lifestyle.

"Super Size Me" is a pretty one-sided affair. Eat a regular sized meal anywhere and do nothing and you'll gain weight. There's been several other people who have tried an all McDonald's diet combined with exercise and ended up in the best health they've been in.

Really, it all boils down to self-responsibility. I drink soda and if it gives me diabetes twenty years down the line, guess who's fault that was? Not Pepsi Co.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Lame, maybe... Posted by: tlCampbell
Diet Coke is still bad for you.
Posted by: talldean on Dec 27, 2006 7:28 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Whereas many Americans now know that high fructose corn syrup is bad for you, they switch to artificially-sweetened soda. Diet soda's still terrible for you, guys.

The sweet taste is what triggers your insulin response, and the insulin spike is what stores the calories as fat. It either puts you at risk for diabetes (if you're drinking diet coke with no additional food), or it makes you fat (if you had a diet coke with dinner), as it causes your body to think it's getting even more calories, and to store too much of the food as fat.

Google search for "artificial sweetener insulin" should turn this one up.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Agree with personal responsibility and...
Posted by: melissa999 on Dec 27, 2006 7:49 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I think the emphasis must be on stopping all advertising on harmful products.

I agree with previous comments that economic reality forces people to choose less nutritious food -- feeding children on $3 a meal -- I believe Jamie Oliver took on the challenge of feeding kids on the British lunch program and he was forced to go down to 1 pound or $2/kid -- and he also struggled to maintain any kind of nutritional value at that price. However, the limitations on a family outside the school might be less -- being frugal and learning about nutrition might make the difference. Also, plenty of wealthy people struggle with their weight, too.

No one is forced to smoke, drink, eat sugar or watch tv.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Hey Bush-Cheney et al. Drink up, Coke is good for ya
Posted by: cold2touch on Dec 27, 2006 9:19 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Don't listen to that pinko health gibberish, support your corporate sponsors.
Apple juice is from Venus, Coke is from Mars, right?
So, just guzzle away f(r)iends.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Just Don't
Posted by: Kitty Lady Oregon on Dec 27, 2006 12:07 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
When I grew up, my parents could not afford what we called "Pop" for 8 kids, so we did not develop a habit of drinking the vile stuff. None of my siblings are heavy, no diabetes in the family, and we are all slender and healthy. I am 69, 5' 1" tall and weigh the same as in high school - 110 lbs. I have never liked pop and will not drink it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Sugar, fat and salt - the mainstay of the junk food sector
Posted by: thoughtcriminal on Dec 27, 2006 12:54 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Basically, the problem is that the raw materials that go into junk food taste awful - would you eat dried out potatoes ground up into a paste and baked? The stuff is only palatable if it's loaded up with sugar, fat and salt - which is why the 'low-fat' products have more sugar and salt, and the "low-salt" products have more sugar, and so on.

The solution is simple - don't eat processed foods and beverages. You want tea, get clean water and make your own tea - dont go and buy some 'ice tea' product that has more sugar in it then a can of coke. You want to eat potatoes, get some organically grown ones and bake them up. Sure it takes a little bit more time - but it will add years to your life.

The problem is fairly psychological as well - we live in a society that markets instant gratification; people are so addled by advertising based on psychological manipulation of wants and desires (sex sells in advertising) that they have a hard time getting off the consumer train.

P.S. These products all result in type 2 diabetes as you age because your body cannot handle that amount of processed sugar, and your sugar metablism ends up going haywire, with very bad results.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Nobody HAS time! Posted by: medstudgeek
» RE: Nobody HAS time! Posted by: Sushi
FREE CIGARETTES, FREE BEER, FREE MEDICRAP
Posted by: cheneybush2008 on Dec 27, 2006 1:35 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
FREE, FREE, FREE.

As long as you votes democrap, that IS.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Hook'em Young
Posted by: rwa on Dec 27, 2006 2:55 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
CBC:
"Also on Monday, the American Academy of Pediatrics released a new position statement on the presence of soft drink machines in schools. It recommended that vending machines not be allowed in the cafeteria and that soft drinks not be sold as part of school lunch programs.

Their position paper drew a link between the wide availability of soft drinks and the fact that 15 per cent of American children aged 6 to 19 are overweight – triple the level recorded in 1980. It also noted that between 56 and 85 per cent of school-aged children drink at least a can of pop a day.

The American Academy of Pediatrics recommends that schools offer children low-fat milk, unsweetened fruit juices and water instead of pop and high-sugar fruit drinks or sports drinks in vending machines and cafeterias."

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» It's the Dough Posted by: edith
Drink Water its all a body needs
Posted by: drblack on Dec 27, 2006 9:51 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As long as it is potable water is the thing. A few Beers is nice too. Moderation is the real key to a great life.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Hey, aren't we talking addiction? Substitute soda/sugar-water
Posted by: wisewebwoman on Dec 27, 2006 10:24 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
ADDICTION CRITERIA

* Taking the drug more often or in larger amounts than intended.

* Unsuccessful attempts to quit; persistent desire, craving.

* Excessive time spent in drug seeking.

* Feeling intoxicated at inappropriate times, or feeling
withdrawal symptoms from a drug at such times.

* Giving up other things for it.

* Continued use, despite knowledge of harm to oneself and others.

* Marked tolerance in which the amount needed to satisfy
increases at first before leveling off.

* Characteristic withdrawal symptoms for particular drugs.

* Taking the drug to relieve or avoid withdrawal.

I speak from experience. I was ADDICTED to Diet Energy Mountain Dew ( a Coke product for the uninitiated and pure of heart). Had to withdraw slowly. (Headaches were suicidal). Don't touch any of those products, diet or otherwise. Water with lemon/lime/cranberry. YUM.
Also try and get the book "Sugar Blues" which will enlighten as to what the drug sugar does.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

smartlady
Posted by: smartlady on Dec 27, 2006 11:39 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Where do you get free water that is potable?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

GMO's Soda & U.S. Guinea Pigs
Posted by: mmmoongoddess on Dec 28, 2006 5:55 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What's not mentioned in the article is that HFCS is largely derived from Genetically Modified Corn, and other processes created by Archers Daniel Midlan (SDM), convicted price fixers of Lysine.

Recent studies have proven that just one meal containing genetically modified foods will change the bacterial flora in your stomach - meaning that either the genetic promoters inserted into the DNA of the plant, or the antibiotic resistance gene also inserted into it, are taken in by the bacterial in your stomach and are changed!.

GMO producing corporations, such as Monsanto, say that processing destroys the DNA, but it ain't necessarily so. The study that showed alteration of stomach bacteria came from patients with ostomy bags whose contents could be sampled after ingesting a meal with GMOs.

For the past decade Monsanto, largely, and other GMO producers have been flooding the market in a ploy to make genetically modified plants so pervasive that 1) they control all seed stock, and 2) that seeds have been so contaminated by GMO pollen that they can then claim ownership. In addition, the U.S. population to a large extent are unwitting guinea pigs who are totally unaware that no long-term health studies have been done on these human creations.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Corn Sweeteners--Prevalence of
Posted by: gtash on Dec 28, 2006 5:59 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I have a brother who , at birth, was allergic to peanuts and wool. He is now almost 60 yrs old, but his allergist says my brother now suffers from an allergy to industrially concentrated sweeteners of the sort described in this piece. As my brother points out: "have you ever tried to buy food that doesn't have corn syrup and corn sweetners in it?"

Actually, I did try to do this and found that my selections were too limited to have a regular daily diet without also having a farmers market nearby, access to cane sugar or beet sugar, and no snack foods or pre-packaged foods at all.

I wonder not so much about colas as I do the effects of the prevalence of processed foods generally. I am certain Archer-Daniels-Midland and the Society of Industrial Chemists have a lot to say about the subject, but I seriously doubt if it is objective. Where is the independent research into a topic like this?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

How about one word - Bullshit!
Posted by: PT Alden on Dec 28, 2006 6:48 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Soda is more harmful than smoking? I think the author would have done well to vet his article through a doctor or two before making such an outrageous claim.

I know AlerNet articles tend toward hyperbole and extremism, (which is just as ugly coming from the left as from the right,) but sometimes the authors go too far.

I'm not saying our diets (including soda) are not harmful, but the author does himself and the readers a disservice by stooping to such a low point. As an ex-smoker I can honestly say I'd rather drink a single soda than smoke a single cigarette. I, too, have watched "Supersize Me" and read Marion Nestle's "Food Politics," and both serve the public good more than this piece of trash.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Sugar = BAD
Posted by: brisa on Dec 28, 2006 8:18 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As a practicing general dentist for the past 25 years, I can tell you that those individuals who have a high sugar diet consistantly suffer from dental disease. Both tooth decay (dental caries) and gum disease (periodontal disease) are promoted by these high sugar products.

Sugar soft drinks are especially damaging due to their habit forming formulation and phosphoric and carbonic acid content. It is no less than criminal that the corporations which produce these products are allowed to escape responsibility for the damage caused and cost incurred to correct those problems.

If the tobacco companies can be successfully held accountable, then soft drink manufacturers should be also. Of course, when corporate profits are the be all and end all, there is little hope for change.

Did I mention the sugar is bad? Eliminate foods rich in refined carbohydrates from your diet and live a much healthier and dental treatment free life.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Diet Sodas Can Kill, Too
Posted by: Zwoman on Dec 28, 2006 9:59 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I have Type 2 diabetes, even though I have never been a soda drinker. However, since being diagnosed I have perused the literature of such outfits as the American Diabetes Association and they all recommend drinking diet sodas. Diet soda is sweetened with aspartame, which is a nerve toxin and actually increases the damage to peripheral nerves that causes diabetic neuropathy!! Aspartame is also the sweetener of choice for all "surgarless" candies and chewing gums. I have avoided these and alerted my doctor to the facts about aspartame.

As an aside, it was Searle pharmaceuticals that invented and pushed aspartame through the FDA as being safe, even though they knew it caused nerve damage. And the CEO of Searle at the time? None other than our old pal, Donald Rumsfeld!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Why are Americans the Fattest and Sickest People on the Planet?
Posted by: williameon on Dec 28, 2006 11:37 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Inside of every fat person is a skinny one
Starving to death!
Their bodies are searching for something good to eat.
High Fructose Corn syrup and Hydrogenated oils are POISON.
Avoid at all cost.
Crappy, spoiled, Franken Poisons.
The corpirate faux food system is a HOAX!
Designed to keep the:
Hospitals filled with patients
Pumped full of pills!
What is
is
The system is terribly broken.
REBOOT!!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Responsibility PLUS
Posted by: Michael in CA on Dec 28, 2006 8:09 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Let me focus on one case to illustrate why responsibility alone is not the answer.

Informed and responsible parents can lower the chances that children will make harmful choices. Eliminating clearly harmful choices from places like schools, where children spend a great deal of time with peers, will lower the chances far more, when combined with informed and responsible parents. Indeed, such parents are required to get soda out of schools.

Regulations don't imply that parents have no role or responsibility. They do imply a recognition of the fact that companies peddle harmful substances from time to time, and sometimes, especially in the case of children, companies' efforts are over the line. Net harmful effect on society.

To the extent that the free market is allowed in schools, fatter kids with weaker bones are present in our schools. Yes, we as citizens have, and should have, the choice as to where the market holds sway. They increased choices and potentialities of healthy children far outweigh Coca-Cola's "freedom" to peddle and advertise in schools.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

our country is broken
Posted by: Shey on Dec 29, 2006 3:31 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The most succinct comment on this thread is at the top, "bad government pimping for Corporate America". The "more dangerous than smoking?" in the article's title is unfortunate hyperbole, although there is the question mark, but the facts in the article are accurate. It's too bad there are always those who personalize everything & are unable or unwilling to see the big picture. Been drinking soda all your life & still thin? There are exceptions to every rule & your personal experience doesn't make this poison any safer for the vast majority. Besides which, who's to say you wont develop bowel cancer, as a direct result?
Think everything is about "discrimination against fat people"? Way to go, play right into the hands of the corporate poisoners who get filthy rich by creating an economy that makes it extremely difficult for the average person to afford a healthy diet, as opposed to a supersized greese-burger meal with all the soda refills you can get down. Think Diet Coke (or "diet" whatever) is the answer, because it's your personal addiction? There's already a great post earlier on this thread documenting the toxicity of artificial sweetners.
Personal responsibility? It's not easy & getting harder every day, an issue tied into all of the above, especially cost & availability of healthy food. The most effective thing we as citizens of this country can do, personal responsibility wise, is get off our asses & VOTE! Not for the candidate with name recognition, or the candidate belonging to the party you've always supported, but after doing research on the actual positions of the various candidates, on the issues that are important to you.
We Americans are killing ourselves in a thousand different ways, from fast food, refined sugar & toxic artificial sweetners, to toxic lawn products to make certain our yards live up to the standards promoted on TV commercials, (that is, those of us fortunate enough to have a lawn is this by-and-for-the -rich economy) to the toxic pharmaceudicals that promise you'll never have to suffer again, be it from that natural human condituion called depression, or the common cold, not to mention the inevitable heartburn caused from eating the above mentioned garbage.
And let's not forget the crimes against humanity committed all over the world by the Coca Cola company, there has been very little comment about that. And I don't doubt that Pepsi and the producers of all the generic brands are just as guilty, they just haven't been caught quite as red handedly .... yet. Because that is what multi-national corporations do. They exploit and pollute and silence protest with increasingly draconian means, while avoiding paying taxes that could help fix our economy. Because we in the U.S elect leaders that allow it to happen, or worse, actively support it. Maybe we don't deserve to survive, as a species. But I'd rather go down fighting for what's right & just, while we're still around.
For the record, my personal addiction is Diet Coke. Doesn't put on the pounds, but I've just named a dozen reasons I should stop drinking it. And addiction is not too strong a term, my efforts to give it up are proving to be as difficult as quiting cigarettes, twenty years ago. Just because an article sounds paranoid, doesn't mean the facts aren't accurate. Don't think sodas are addictive, sugared or diet? If you drink them every day, try stopping for just one week. As for myself, I'm hoping this article, plus the excellent comment on why artificial sweetners are just as toxic, will prod me into finally breaking the habit. Tea, anyone? No sweetners, please.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: our country is broken Posted by: Sushi
Drink Jones Soda
Posted by: tke919 on Jan 3, 2007 6:39 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Jones Soda (found in Panera Bread Co. restaurants) is dumping high fructose corn syrup. Granted, it's still not as good for you as, say, water, but there's no way in hell I'm giving up their Black Cherry soda.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Very sexist sentence in the article.
Posted by: Bev on Jan 31, 2007 7:21 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"Perhaps most alarmingly of all, half of all women aged 20 to 39 in the United States are included in these figures."

give me a break.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]