Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

Border Jumping to Mexico: A Journey Across Imaginary Lines

By Neelanjana Banerjee, New America Media. Posted December 11, 2006.


In the midst of the raging immigration debate, there's no better way to get a pulse on the issues than riding a tourist trolley across the invisible line to Mexico.

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

In Special Coverage

Belief:
Is Blind Faith in God and the Bible a Modern Invention?
Devilstower

Corporate Accountability and WorkPlace:
What Can the Morass of the 1970s Tell Us About the Current Economic Crisis?
Alejandro Reuss

DrugReporter:
Why Are We Locking Up Traumatized Veterans for Their Addictions Instead of Offering Them Treatment?
Penny Coleman

Environment:
Why Max Baucus' 'No' Vote on the Climate Bill May Really Help Its Passage
Jeff Mcmahon

Food:
Soda Helps Make Americans Unhealthy and Fat -- Will Soda Tax Prevail Despite Pushback by Beverage Industry?
Christine Spolar, Joseph Eaton

Health and Wellness:
Does the House Bill's Public Option Kill Off the Senate's?
Booman

Immigration:
Recent Democratic Victories May Grease the Wheels for Immigration Reform in Congress
Marcelo Balive

Media and Technology:
Glenn Beck, Sean Hannity, Rush Limbaugh Stoking GOP Civil War
Eric Boehlert

Movie Mix:
The Yes Men: Pranksters Out to Fix the World
Mark Engler

Politics:
What Obama Is Up Against in His Own Branch of Government
Russ Baker

Reproductive Justice and Gender:
"Precious" Star Claims the Spotlight
Emily Wilson

Rights and Liberties:
Hard to Believe: 73 U.S. Kids Sentenced to Life Without Parole at 14 or Younger, and All Are Black
Liliana Segura

Sex and Relationships:
9 Silly Things People Say When They Hear You Don't Want Kids (And Ways to Counter Them)
Liz Langley

Take Action:
G-20 Meetings: Nothing Much Happened in the Suites, and There Was Too Much Punch in the Streets
Laura Flanders

Water:
Radioactive Wastewater in New York Raises More Concerns About Oil Drilling
Abrahm Lustgarten

World:
Afghanistan Is Worse Off Than Ever, Thanks to the Sham Army We're Propping Up
Chris Hedges

More stories by Neelanjana Banerjee

Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

In the midst of the raging immigration debate, there's no better way to get a pulse on the issues than riding a tourist trolley across the invisible line to Mexico. A few weeks ago I boarded the "Border Jumper" from El Paso to Juarez. I was traveling with passengers on opposite ends of the immigration spectrum: my older, conservative brother, a major in the United States Air Force, and my boyfriend, whose family immigrated illegally to this country in the early 1980s.

My older brother Rahul has been living in El Paso for the past few years. Each time I visit, I urge him to take a trip into Juarez with me, insisting on seeing the biggest metropolitan area - populated by some 2 million people - on America's southern border. He usually shoots me down. Last year, there was no discussion. "It's dangerous there," he said grimly. Instead, I spent an afternoon at the National Border Patrol Museum, a small concrete box where a whole wall is dedicated to sharp shooting awards earned by Border Patrol officers.

Rahul and I are pretty different political animals. I'm an anti-war, Green Party member living in San Francisco. My brother began his slow drift to the right as a reaction to the over-liberal atmosphere at his Ivy League university. He joined the Air Force in the late 1990s, just before entering medical school, when it was a benign way to get medical school paid for and a guaranteed four-year job. Now, my brother is considering volunteering for duty in Iraq, where his skills as a trauma surgeon might come in handy. He epitomizes the country-serving immigrant who believes that his benefits will be preserved by closing the doors to others.


My boyfriend's father came to the U.S. in the early 1970s from India and earned an MBA. But tightening immigration policies during the Vietnam War prevented him from being able to get citizenship, so he moved to Canada instead - where my boyfriend, Robin, and his sister were born. After a few years in Toronto, my boyfriend's father decided it was the American dream he was after, not the Canadian one, so the family drove across the Canadian border and never went home. Unlike today's anti-immigrant policies, in 1986Republican president Ronald Reagan granted amnesty to 2.5 million illegal immigrants who 'd been living and paying taxes in the United States. Robin and his family qualified and they are now all U.S. citizens.

This year in El Paso, I insisted that we cross the border before a 700-mile fence guarded by aerial drones seals it for good. Again, I was met with resistance and was intrigued by my brother's notion of danger in Juarez, a place he told me was "run by drug lords," a place where he said "we could be murdered in the streets." Granted, Juarez is a dangerous place, but for who? If my brother, a second-generation Indian who has traveled to much poorer parts of the world than Juarez, had such strong notions of a city barely a mile from his home - I wondered what less traveled people must think.

My brother agreed to the trip but only if we took the Juarez trolley - ironically named the Border Jumper - a transportainment industry which shuttles tourists across the border in a green and red trolley, making seven stops at shops, restaurants, markets and finally, a pharmacy. As soon as we passed into Mexico, you could see a palpable difference. The streets were in disrepair, the soot-stained buildings did not mirror the shiny high rises of downtown El Paso. "I can't believe how much it reminds me of India," Robin said to me, amazed. Every establishment we passed seemed to be either a bar catering to El Paso's underage drinkers or a dentist's office offering cut-rate root canals.


But it was also a lively, fun town. At one of the stops, I struck up a conversation with a young man, selling paintings depicting traditional Mexican landscapes. I asked him if he spent a lot of time in El Paso and he vigorously shook his head no. "It's boring there," he said. "Most people come here for fun." He told us which nightclubs were good, where he went to skateboard and listen to Juarez's growing punk rock scene and pointed us down a street where we walked past the Hollywood-style mansion of singer Juan Gabriel. After wandering around in a tourist market for a few hours, we got back on the rickety trolley carrying its load of mostly white tourists. I asked my brother if he had seen any drug lords . He ignored me.

As the trolley creeped across the heavily-guarded border, we watched the steady stream of people walking along the bridge between the two countries. When I asked my brother what he thought the solution to the immigration issue is, he said he didn't know but that illegal immigration was a serious problem. He talked about the strain illegal immigrants have on the health care system, the public schools and the general safety of the area. He said the majority of patients he treats were undocumented immigrants. When we went through the actual border check, where our driver's licenses were barely perused and the majority of the people didn't have their goods x-rayed, my brother couldn't believe it. "That was border security?" he kept asking as we drove back to his house. "That guy behind us probably smuggled three small children into the country inside that giant Spiderman piƱata."

Later that night, Robin told us about his vague memory of coming across the Canadian border with his family when he was five years old. He said his family could only pack a few suitcases, because they wanted to appear like they were only going on vacation, meaning they had to leave almost everything behind. He said that before they crossed his parents told him and sister not to say anything.

He could clearly remember how scary it was when the border patrol looked into the car at them. Robin's family's experience and my brother's daily life in El Paso make me realize how many families out there are struggling to survive without papers. "My father just wanted a better life for us," he said. In the post-9.11 world, it would have been impossible for Robin's family to cross the border into America.

Riding across the border in a trolley full of Americans eager to buy up Mexican handicrafts and discount prescription drugs made me also realize how connected these two countries are. I think a lot of Indian Americans think that the immigration debate doesn't touch them as a model minority community. But our family's spectrum of experience, from my brother's military work to my boyfriend's border crossing experience, made me realize that this issue touches all of us, no matter what generation we came here or how we got here.

Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: immigration, border

Neelanjana Banerjee is an editor at YO! Youth Outlook Multimedia.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
right
Posted by: rsaxto on Dec 11, 2006 2:45 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
How easy it is for the "right" people to cross and how hard it is for the "wrong" people to cross. It is a metaphor for how crazy and undemocratic the world has become. Guns and bombs have made us insane. Or insane people are making guns and bombs. Will human society ever be decent?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Canada is not a LOW WAGE country. Mexico is
Posted by: emmanuel_goldstein_fights_fake_lefties on Dec 11, 2006 4:42 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Here is the engine of the mass immigration scam being perpetrated by the overclass:

THere are N jobs in America which are creatd by X amount of "labor demand."

A person who lives in a high wage country like America contributes a certain amount to that labor demand. Let's call that amount Z.

A person who lives in a low wage country like Mexico also contributes a certain amount that that labor demand. But the amount contributed by the person from Mexico (or other low wage countries) is LESS that the amount contributed to labor demand by the people from HIGH wage countries. Why? Because the average INCOME in low wage countries is LESS in American dollars. So instead of contributing Z amount to the labor demand that creates jobs in America, a person from Mexico contributes something like Z/2 or Z/3, or something like that.

Now suppose a person (called "A") from a high wage country comes to the USA and competes for a job. And also a person (called "B") from a LOW wage country comes to the USA and competes for a job. They are both competing for a job here in America, but they have CONTRIBUTED different amounts to the Labor DEMAND that CREATED that very job.

Because B (from Mexico) contributed less to the demand, he is STEALING from those from America.

Also, because B from Mexico and his ancestors did not sweat and bleed and die to build this country, ANY job opportunities that appear here in America rightfully belong to us Americans.

THe elite of Mexico and America are our enemies, along with the illegals. To win ANY war, FIRST know who you enemy is.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» hateful view here Posted by: monkopotamus
» hateful mathematics? Posted by: emmanuel_goldstein_fights_fake_lefties
» speaking of gibberish..... Posted by: emmanuel_goldstein_fights_fake_lefties
» here's some homework Posted by: AdamG
Dept. of Homeland Security, Borders & the Economy
Posted by: sausage on Dec 11, 2006 6:32 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I was in the Rio Grande River Valley region for Thanksgiving. Went to Nuevo Progresso, Tamaulipas, Mexico for Thanksgiving dinner. Nuevo Progresso, or just Progresso as everybody on both sides of the Rio Bravo del Norte call it, caters to "Winter Texans," mostly retired Midwesterners, so the main street is lined with drug stores, dentists, restaurants and bars, and trinket vendors. Tourism is Progresso's only raison d'etre, without the Winter Texans it would go back to being a sleepy border town of no significance.

The reason I mention Progresso is that in conversations with local Texans, both Chicano and Anglo, they expressed horror at the Department of Homeland Security's Western Hemisphere Travel Initiative (WHTI), especially the proviso:"As early as January 1, 2008, ALL persons, including U.S. citizens, traveling between the U.S. and Canada, Mexico, Central and South America, the Caribbean, and Bermuda by land or sea (including ferries), may be required to present a valid passport or other documents as determined by the Department of Homeland Security."(Travel.State.gov)

A park ranger at Bentsen-Rio Grande Valley State Park said that DHS's passport requirement would wreck the economies of both sides of the border. And the owner of a well-known tourist destination in Mission, TX was of the opinion that the DHS's paranoia was bad for his business: "A border fense will kill me!"

My parent's next door neighbors, US citizens, still have relatives in Mexico and have long though nothing of crossing and recrossing to visit gran'ma in Chino, Mex. But beginning in '08 the family of four will have to shell out $97 each for passport photos just to get back home to Alamo, TX.

I grew up in an era when the United States boasted for having the longest unguarded borders with its neighbors, Canada and Mexico, in the world. But if we persist with the Bush-Chertoff paranoid delusion of terrorists sneaking across our border, then it will become a very real nightmare.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» ah, then we have the crypto-right, so-called "market fundamentalists" etc Posted by: emmanuel_goldstein_fights_fake_lefties
Its Amazing
Posted by: albrechtkrausse on Dec 11, 2006 7:40 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
how people in the US seem to wish to bring the 3rd world Mexican conditions and the assorted violence, debauchery, and social problems to the US and create an additional underclass of people working a near-slave wages. Its understandable that the corporatists and uber-rich would want this because they can make money off the cheap labour and live in their gated estates, but why so many progressives have been fooled into believing that illegal immgration is a good think is beyond me. The US is FAR from perfect and I think we should fix our environmental, social, racial, criminal, and violence problem without importing more!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Its Amazing Posted by: Jordon
» RE: Its Amazing Posted by: albrechtkrausse
» RE: Its Amazing Posted by: JDMB
Question
Posted by: karma_ran_over_dogma on Dec 11, 2006 8:50 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"But tightening immigration policies during the Vietnam War prevented him from being able to get citizenship..."

This is the first I've ever heard of that! Can anyone clarify the author's paranoia? I wonder how so many Vietnamese people got in legally back then.

Nice article about the trolley to Juarez - the trolley to Tijuana is next (yawn).

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Question 2
Posted by: karma_ran_over_dogma on Dec 11, 2006 8:56 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"Now, my brother is considering volunteering for duty in Iraq, where his skills as a trauma surgeon might come in handy."

And why do we need more STUPID immigrants - even if they are trauma surgeons?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Question 2 Posted by: logansafi
Volunteer?
Posted by: Lincoln fan on Dec 11, 2006 9:54 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Since when has it been necessary for an Army doctor to volunteer for duty in Iraq? I have a close relative who is an Army doctor he was sent to Iraq without volunteering and faces addditional tours. Several doctors from his hospital have had multiple tours and none of them volunteered for even one tour. This has often been a hardship for their wives who have children to raise.
Bob Reichenbach,
Director, The Lincoln Initiative.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Hey Alternet - Boston Globe editorial today
Posted by: karma_ran_over_dogma on Dec 11, 2006 10:44 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
African-Americans need apply
December 11, 2006

THE NUMBER of African-American hotel workers across the United States appears to be falling at the same time that foreign-born hospitality workers are rising into the middle class. The disappearing African-American hotel worker is just one of many problems that perpetuates an urban underclass. But it is a problem, at least, that a fast-growing, private sector union wants to tackle.

John Wilhelm, president of Unite Here, which represents roughly 200,000 unionized hotel workers across the United States, says that new immigrant populations, including black workers from the Caribbean, have been replacing African-Americans in hotel service jobs for about a decade. In Los Angeles and San Francisco, say local union officials, African-Americans now comprise only about 6 percent of workers in downtown hotels. Without access to comprehensive hiring data from hotel management , says Wilhelm, shop stewards in Boston and across the country are now surveying their individual hotels to compile figures on African-American hiring.

Wilhelm says some of the decline might reflect perceptions among African-Americans that the hotel industry offers "dead end jobs." But he also fears that hotel operators who praise the work ethic of new immigrants may actually be more interested in hiring workers who are less likely to know and assert their rights than people born in the United States. So at collective bargaining tables around the country, including Boston, union negotiators are calling for the creation of committees composed of hotel workers, community leaders, and hotel managers to determine the extent of the problem and craft solutions.

Wilhelm says he is "astonished" by hotel executives who resist the creation of such working groups. Last month, contract negotiations in Boston erupted into a heated exchange on the issue after union officials claimed that only 32 African-Americans out of 1,308 employees held jobs in three Starwood-operated downtown hotels. Bob Batterman, the hotel industry negotiator, pegs the figure at roughly 200 African-Americans working at four downtown Starwood hotels. Though the numbers dispute could crop up again in negotiations scheduled for today, Batterman says that Boston hotels "are prepared to do whatever outreach is necessary" to underrepresented groups.

Strict racial quotas are unwise. Yet mere outreach efforts often lack teeth. A plan with goals and timetables, however, could still emerge from the committees. But first, the hotels need to share their data with the unions, to get a common understanding on the depth of the problem. Then African-Americans who shun hotel jobs might warm to the fact that, in an industry where managers prefer to promote from within, there really are no dead-end jobs.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Just the facts, ma'am
Posted by: YogiBear on Dec 11, 2006 11:23 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
These articles would be a lot easier to take if they didn't always start off on the false premise that this debate is about immigration.

Unlike today's anti-immigrant policies

Anti-illegal immigrant. To the best of my knowledge, around a million immigrants are naturalized every year in the U.S. I sure would like to know how that qualifies as "anti-immigrant."

in 1986 Republican president Ronald Reagan granted amnesty to 2.5 million illegal immigrants who'd been living and paying taxes in the United States.

Do you remember the reason? It came with the promise that it would solve the illegal immigration problem. It was supposed to be coupled with serious reform. Sound familiar?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Illegals ? Posted by: Stop bush now
Invisible Lines-Do they matter?
Posted by: SamFox on Dec 11, 2006 6:29 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There are lots of "invible lines." Does being invisible make them un-important? How about the ones around your house, car, kids, women, children...is ok to breech the moral demarcation (invisible line) because it cannot be seen? You know, the one understood to say "you may not break into the house, steal the car, rape the daughter/wife or kidnap the children". Why is the invisible border, our first line of defense, less important?

If someone breaks into the author's house after crossing her invisible property line it's OK 'cause the line is invisible?

For a look at the rest of the story go to
newswithviews.com At the bottom of the page find the site search box. Enter illegal immigration. The web address is too long for here or I would have posted it for an easy click.
For a very sobering look at some results of those who do not respect the invisible line we call the US border, go to:
http://immigrationshumancost.org/

She may not know it, but the author is a fellow traveler with those on Capitol Hill who work to betray this country into the North American Union which will lead to further treason by selling US out to the New World Order.

SamFox

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» yes, boundaries matter Posted by: AdamG
Had enough? Meet Kucinich : The Anti- NAFTA candidate
Posted by: Stop bush now on Dec 12, 2006 12:31 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
For more information go to:
www.Dennis Kucinich.US
and
www.TruthDig.Com
Support Dennis Kucinich- A true progressive for 2008 !

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

NO MORE AMERICAN ILLEGALS IN CANADA
Posted by: Jordon on Dec 12, 2006 1:05 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I am sick and tired of these dirty white-skinned yanks who sneak across our border every year to get a taste of the "good life" without having to work for it. Our pussy Consrevative goverment promised to build a landmine strip, but did it come through? nooooo. Now the poor border farmers and cops are forced to shoot entire families on site. What a waste of ammunition! Anyway, you think the Mexicans are bad, wait till you see the American walmart workers, willing to work without a union and everything! God Dang Yanks! Go back to yankland!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

greenguy
Posted by: ossie on Dec 14, 2006 3:00 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What makes America great are Social Programs fought for by Socialist's in the 20's and 30's.But the Right wing now claim America is great because of them. GO Figure.The 8 hour day,40 hour week,minimum wage,vacation time,SS benefiets,The right to Strike for better pay and safety at the work place.No Thanks to Right wingers

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement