Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Jon Tester: A New Kind of Populist

By Joshua Frank, AlterNet. Posted December 15, 2006.


Newly elected Montana Senator Jon Tester is an NRA-approved Democrat who wants to redeploy troops from Iraq and repeal the PATRIOT Act. Is Washington ready for him?
Advertisement

He's not exactly the type of Democrat you'd be likely to see backslapping New York City fat cats on their way into an elaborate fund raiser for Hillary Clinton. In fact, Jon Tester, the senator-elect from Montana, isn't your typical Democrat. He's almost not a Democrat at all, or at least not the kind we're used to seeing run around Washington these days. In fact Tester ran his campaign against Senator Conrad Burns (R-Mont.) on just that platform. He was tired of the scandals and dishonesty that engulf our national politics and professed that the polluted Beltway could use a little Montana house cleanin'. Voters agreed, and Burns, who had ties to the now incarcerated power broker Jack Abramoff, was defeated in one of the tightest races in state history.

A State Senator and organic farmer by trade, Jon operates his family's homestead just outside Big Sandy in northern Montana where the winter chills can chatter your teeth as early as mid-September. When I say he's not really even a Democrat, that may be a bit of an understatement. Tester is essentially an NRA approved neo-populist with libertarian tendencies who wants to immediately redeploy troops from Iraq as well as repeal the PATRIOT Act. And although nobody would consider Tester an anti-globalization activist, his position on international trade is more in line with the protesters who shut down Seattle in 1999 than with the Democratic Leadership Council.

On a recent Meet the Press broadcast Tester even addressed the most evaded issue in national politics: Poverty. "There's no more middle class," he confessed to Tim Russert, "the working poor aren't even being addressed. Those are the people who brought us here [to Congress] and they need to be empowered. It's time to show them attention ... We have to use policy to help that situation."

In a debate last September, Sen. Conrad Burns attempted to paint Tester as weak on terror. "We cannot afford another 9/11," Burns chided. "I can tell you that right now, he [Tester] wants to weaken the PATRIOT Act." To which Tester countered, "Let me be clear. I don't want to weaken the PATRIOT Act. I want to get rid of it."

Tester built his campaign from the ground up, shunning support from nationally known Democrats like John Kerry and Hillary Clinton, as he knew they'd rub Montanans the wrong way. Instead, the nearly 300 pound farmer who lost three fingers in a meat grinding accident as a child, drove around the state so he could chat face-to-face with his potential constituents.

Fortunately for Tester, he's used to bucking the system. His first foray with the Washington Consensus came in 1998 when he ran for the Montana legislature because he was outraged over the huge energy hikes that had resulted from the state's deregulation of the power industry. And he's been speaking out against policies that pit working folks against the corporate class ever since. That's why he supports renewable energies and a livable minimum wage.

Still, Tester isn't the perfect politician. While he may remain strong on many issues, he is a bit wishy-washy on a few social justice concerns, such as the death penalty and gay rights. Nevertheless, Tester's campaign and personal appeal may serve as a winning blueprint for left-leaning populists out here in the Interior West. Indeed Brian Schweitzer used the exact formula to become Governor of Montana two years ago.

We should keep an eye on the senator-to-be when he takes office next month. If Jon Tester shuns the corporate wing of the Democratic Party, and truly speaks for the people of Montana, he could have a profound effect on our national discourse. Not to mention the way business is done in Washington.

Digg!

See more stories tagged with: neopopulist, populist, tester

Joshua Frank is the author of Left Out! How Liberals Helped Reelect George W. Bush and edits http://www.BrickBurner.org.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
He sure beats Evan BYE anyday !
Posted by: superfeduphoosier on Dec 15, 2006 4:04 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Indiana could sure use a Jon Tester clone. I'm so sick and tired of the left misjudging populist Democrats on social issues while at the same time marginalizing their truly liberal positions on the economy, environment, and even foreign policy. The problem with most media outlets including this one is folks such as Bayh, Clinton, Schumer, Rangel, etc ... are automatically given the "liberal" label just because they go overboard only on the social issues even as they SELL OUT their own base. In reality, folks such as Tester are actually trying to rescue the Democratic Party. It will be interesting to see how Tester, Sanders, etc ... battle the Establishment "Democrats" and Republicans in the next 6 years. Best of luck.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» GEE, SOUNDS LIKE YOU ARE TALKING ABOUT THE FAKE-LEFT VS THE TRUE-LEFT... Posted by: emmanuel_goldstein_fights_fake_lefties
» So who's a leftist? Posted by: hagwind
Populist, my ass!
Posted by: citizenjoe on Dec 15, 2006 4:19 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Populists favor popular REBELLION against the established economic elite. Huey Long was a populist. Tester is part of the established elite and is not appealing for a rebellion against the corporate big wigs. You don't hear him talking about corporate scum. He is an old fashioned Democrat with some decent ethics who believes in piece-meal reforms, very small ones. Sure, he seems opposed to a stupid war that has already been lost. That has nothing to do with populism. To call an ordinary Harry Truman type Democrat "a populist" shows how far to the right the political vocabulary in the USA has gone. This is complete ignorance about populism and just plain idiotic phrase mongering. Joshua Frank should be ashamed and go study some history!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Populist, my ass! Posted by: Douglas
» Phrase mongering? Posted by: hagwind
» Too the barricades! Posted by: sausage
» Populism Posted by: citizenjoe
» "established elite"? Posted by: bassman
» How about the Democratic Party? Posted by: citizenjoe
» sorry, Webb is the Navy guy Posted by: citizenjoe
Stop with the silly definitions, already!
Posted by: OldRedleg on Dec 15, 2006 7:19 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Why are so many of you folks out there so hung up on strictly defining what a populist is and what populism is or means. In case you hadn't noticed, down deep, we really are different albeit with some surprising and perhaps frighteningly similar tendencies. I think Joshua Frank was pointing out that Mr. Tester did not, at least at this point, appear to be one of the typical "DC politicians" subject to the power of the DLC and the other corporate powers who have such a hold on what is (not) accomplished in our government for the common people. If Senator Tester and Senator Webb of Virginia can shake things up enough to draw attention to some real issues that never get enough publicity, perhaps much of the glitter will fade from Clinton and Obama, the current so-called Presidential front runners of the Democratic party.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Jon Tester is a Populist
Posted by: Kramer on Dec 15, 2006 9:58 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Dear Citizen Joe, I know Jon Tester adn worked on his campaign. I personally coordinated the get out the vote calling for the Primary where I live in May and June. It was probably the biggest grassroots effort this state has ever seen. He was profoundly underfunded in both the Primary and the General Elections. This was a word of mouth campaign and some tactical decisions were made to spend the bulk of the money raised strategically at the end of the campaign rather than throughout. There were many, many fundraisers for Jon. While he received limited money from PACs, he received the bulk of his money from people making $20, $25, or $35 donations at a time. Yes, Jon IS a Prairie Populist. People can't get elected today if they openly say they outright oppose coporate bigwigs. The money is on the wrong side. It's better to just quietly go about your business in Congress and get things done rather than shouting how one opposes big corporations. It pays to be a little circumspect when opening one's mouth in politics. Also, I'm not convinced that Jim Webb is the read deal. We'll have to wait and see what happens.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Corporate wing?
Posted by: rotorooter on Dec 15, 2006 11:17 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What is the corporate wing of the democratic party? Who are they?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Corporate wing? Posted by: OldRedleg
» Here's a list of names Posted by: lessbread
Terrific, a polite intelligent discusson!
Posted by: citizenjoe on Dec 15, 2006 11:57 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Guys and gals, one of the main points about populism is this: it is a popular anti-elitist MOVEMENT. Jon Tester may be a great guy with a decent and compassionate ethic towards working and poor people. If so great, but that does not make him part of an anti-corporate movement-- even if he is anti-corporate himself! Please do not confuse "grass roots politician" with "populist". Tester is a creature of the Democratic Party, even if they did not support him at first.
Regards, CJ

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Populists
Posted by: Maryanne on Dec 15, 2006 3:44 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
While in graduate school (University of Rochester) I researched the populist movement's impact on subsequent US policies.

Those who voted Populist (and were still alive a couple decades later), subsequently voted with the Progressives in federal elections.

At the turn of the 20th century, the policies were the same, only the name had changed.

Names mean little. It is the issues that are important.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» The tuth matters to me Posted by: citizenjoe
» RE: The tuth matters to me Posted by: Maryanne
» You fail to see the point Posted by: citizenjoe
"If Jon Tester shuns . . .
Posted by: yesman on Dec 15, 2006 10:13 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
. . . the corporate wing of the Democratic Party," then he will shun virtually the entire Democratic Party (or at least the entire Democratic Party establishment). That would be a good thing, and more power to him.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Reminds me of James Webb, an NRA member, yet he had an unusual victory based on his populist appeal.
Posted by: maxpayne on Dec 16, 2006 5:08 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
In both Northern Virginia and the minority areas in Richmond and Hampton Roads areas, gun control is more favorable whereas in rural Virginia especially the Shenandoah area bordering West Virginia, gun control is abhorred.

Northern Virginia voted heavily for Webb (Arlington, Prince William County, Fairfax, Loudon, Fredericksburg) even though those areas are filled with upper middle class to the rich. Rural Virginia, especially Shenandoah, would tremendously benefit from Webb's populist positions and yet the area still voted heavily for Allen. The Richmond and Hampton Roads area where I'm at, on the other hand, stayed split in VA Beach and Chesapeake while Richmond, Norfolk, Newport News, Hampton, and Williamsburg went for Webb even though they were heavily minority areas and Webb's views of affirmative action may not sit well with them.

Populism does have its odd consequences. I don't know how it worked in Montana but in Virginia, in heavily minority areas and even well-to-do areas, the working class voters are very sensitive to the economic disaster no matter how far the media goes to lie about the "economy" doing so "great". Webb and Tester are now put to test to see if they'll fight for the economic populism they promised. If they do their job, win or lose, voters will keep them.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

my take on some of these new members
Posted by: cold2touch on Dec 16, 2006 5:40 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Both Tester and Webb are pro-NRA and pro-death penalty, I would assume sceptical about universal health care and "chick" issues close to Hillary's heart. I would also imagine that Ron Paul, my favorite Republican would agree with them.
The point is that these guys exude honesty and integrity, and if they are the real deal, then they have my support despite a bunch of disagreements.
I would rather deal with someone I know to be a straight shooter with whom I disagree on just about everything than with a backstabbing sleazebag who agrees with me on everything.
Because an honest person is also open minded and always on the lookout for truth and is not afraid of owning up to a mistake, once he/she realizes it. Furthermore, they are less likely to goose step along the party line in the parade grounds.
What kind of Democrats are they if they just blindly run where the party whip points?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The only Populist Presidents were Andy Jackson and T. Jefferson
Posted by: poppop_schell on Dec 17, 2006 8:42 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Believe me, the establishment elite went beserk when Old Hickory was elected. He brought an end to the National Bank, the key foundation of the financial elite. He brought regular folks into his social gathering at the White House. He WAS the President of the little guy. In fact, the time became none as Jacksonian Democracy. Grover Cleveland was a neo-Populist.

To some extent, T. Jefferson was a Constitutional Populist although he was certainly part of the elite. He was a strong advocate of Republicanism and states rights which brough power down to the local level.

I always find it interesting when the "leftists" who seem to control the national DP speak in reverence of the party of Jefferson and Jackson and actually them to raise money. The DP today is BIG CENTRALIZED Government and seems to be out to eliminate Christian values as a part of the governance of this Republic.

Yes, there a leftrist Populists but I am a Constitutional Populist who wishes to move ahead to a Republic oif Republics.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

For once guns rights are mentioned
Posted by: albrechtkrausse on Dec 17, 2006 3:03 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
as a good thing that must be preserved in an Alternet article! Congratulations. Its about time the left realised that guns are as important as free speech or habeus corpus rights. Good to see some more candidates support a person's right to own guns that aren't on the far-right or some crackpot evangelical. Remember "Gun control is about CONTROL, not guns."

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Conservative dems
Posted by: lamar on Dec 18, 2006 6:47 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Jon Tester, the libertarian lean-leaning Democrat. I, for one, wish that this would become the new "conservative Democrat" model. I can't stand Democrats who think that becoming more conservative means going to church more.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

A lecture on Populism
Posted by: citizenjoe on Dec 20, 2006 7:46 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Go to American Prospect online and read the short essay by Wilentz. He knows what he is talking about. Of course, I do not endorse his politics, just his scholarship.


The Populist Fantasy
Wrong history, wrong politics
By Sean Wilentz
Issue Date: 10.07.02

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]