Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

Business Is the Next Big Casualty in Iraq

By Dahr Jamail and Ali Al-Fadhily, IPS News. Posted December 4, 2006.


Most Iraqi businesses have collapsed under the weight of U.S.-backed economic laws, the breakdown of security, lack of electricity and fuel, and soaring inflation.

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

In Special Coverage

Belief:
Is Blind Faith in God and the Bible a Modern Invention?
Devilstower

Corporate Accountability and WorkPlace:
Who's Paying for the Recession Most of All? Young Workers
Lizzy Ratner

DrugReporter:
Lies About Marijuana Drive People to a Much More Harmful Drug -- Booze
Steve Fox

Environment:
Why Max Baucus' 'No' Vote on the Climate Bill May Really Help Its Passage
Jeff Mcmahon

Food:
Soda Helps Make Americans Unhealthy and Fat -- Will Soda Tax Prevail Despite Pushback by Beverage Industry?
Christine Spolar, Joseph Eaton

Health and Wellness:
Do We Really Want to Enshrine Insurance Monopoly into Law? This and 5 Other Complaints About the Health Bill
John Nichols

Immigration:
NYC Marathon Raises Question of Who Is American Enough?
James E. Johnson, Jr.

Media and Technology:
How Biased Media Can Brainwash You
Melinda Burns

Movie Mix:
The Yes Men: Pranksters Out to Fix the World
Mark Engler

Politics:
4 Ways the Stupak Amendment Deprives Women of Access to Abortion
Jessica Arons

Reproductive Justice and Gender:
How the Stupak Amendment Radically Undermines Abortion Rights
Rachel Morris

Rights and Liberties:
"My Kids Want to Hide Their Identity; They're Scared Someone Will Attack Us": U.S. Muslims Being Targeted
Jaisal Noor

Sex and Relationships:
9 Silly Things People Say When They Hear You Don't Want Kids (And Ways to Counter Them)
Liz Langley

Take Action:
G-20 Meetings: Nothing Much Happened in the Suites, and There Was Too Much Punch in the Streets
Laura Flanders

Water:
Why Natural Gas Is Not a Clean Energy Panacea
Stan Cox

World:
10 Suicides a Month at Ft. Hood -- War Stress Is Taking Soldiers to the Brink
Dahr Jamail

More stories by Dahr Jamail Ali Al-Fadhily

Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

"Iraq got the foreign investment rules long sought by U.S. corporations," says Antonia Juhasz, a visiting scholar at the Institute for Policy Studies in Washington.

Juhasz said the new laws, which were a part of the 100 'Bremer Orders' instituted by former U.S. administrator Paul Bremer when he headed the Coalition Provisional Authority during the first year of the occupation, provided a flood of benefits for U.S. companies.

These included "100 percent repatriation of profits earned in Iraq by foreign companies; 100 percent foreign ownership of Iraqi businesses, including banks; privatisation of Iraq's state owned enterprises; 100 percent immunity for U.S. contractors and soldiers from Iraq's laws; and 'national treatment' which allowed for Iraqis to be all but excluded from the reconstruction for years while the U.S. government paid 50 billion dollars to some 150 U.S. corporations for work in Iraq."

What followed was "a U.S. corporate invasion of Iraq," says Juhasz. "Many companies had their sights set on privatisation in Iraq, also made possible by Bremer, which helps explain their interest in 'major overhauls' rather than getting the systems up and running."

In contrast, there was much state support for businesses under the previous regime, which followed a socialist system under which the government allowed Iraqis to establish their own factories and workshops, and supported them in many ways.

Businesses were granted low interest loans and permission to transfer foreign currency. They could get state-owned land to build on. Administrative laws facilitated enterprise, and so small industry business bloomed during the 1970s and 1980s.

Major industries in Iraq for oil products, phosphates and cement, along with the military industry, were mostly state-run under the previous regime. Foreign companies were allowed, under state supervision, to build factories as Iraq moved towards increasing industrialisation.

This growth was reversed during the 1990's under the U.S-backed UN economic sanctions. The sanctions crippled the Iraqi dinar and people's ability to purchase goods and services.

The business situation worsened further during the U.S.-led invasion when most factories ceased to function. Many were bombed, and for other factories employees stayed at home. Following the invasion several were looted, and were never able to start again.

Some private businesses held out, but eventually security problems, lack of electricity and fuel, a staggering inflation rate (70 percent) and lack of safe transportation led many of these too to close down. Unemployment now stands at more than 50 percent -- but most people believe the real situation is far worse.

Thousands of business and factory owners sold what they could and fled to neighbouring countries. Those who did not now wish they had.

"I used to employ more than 30 workers in my plastic products factory, and business was good before the occupation," Abbas Ali said in Baghdad. "It is impossible to work now, and I had to go back to my old job as school teacher. I was offered 200,000 dollars for the business, but now it is not worth anything. I blame myself for not selling it to flee, like some of my colleagues who live safely in Syria now."

And still, there are steel, textile, and other factories that continue to produce what they can.

Kais al-Nazzal built a set of steel factories about 60km west of Baghdad near Fallujah, and is fighting to keep them going. "We imported the best quality steel manufacturing equipment and spent millions of dollars on modern buildings to meet international standards," Kais al-Nazzal said.

"We have been able to work through the occupation period, but we must admit there are hardships under the recent domestic disturbances that are causing us considerable losses."

Local studies have found 85 percent unemployment in the industry sector. Many of the 15 percent who remain employed are registered at a few state factories that pay their employees even if they produce nothing.

"We are trying to do some work here, but the whole situation is not encouraging, so it seems that we will wait until a miracle takes place," a manager at a state-owned cement factory on the outskirts of Baghdad said.

The business and economic morass Iraq finds itself in today is evident in the market places across the capital city.

About 80 percent of domestically manufactured goods were distributed prior to the invasion and occupation through the Shorja market in the centre of Baghdad. The wholesale market is a bazaar along narrow roads where hundreds of small shop-owners display their merchandise.

"There is no Iraqi brand any more," plastic products distributor Johar Aziz told IPS. "Iraqi products flourished during the quarter century before occupation, but now we only sell imported products of the lowest quality, and people have to buy them because there is no alternative."

Other markets in Baghdad are suffering a similar crisis, like the Samarraii compound where tyres are sold, the Jamila market for fruits and vegetables, and the Sinaa market for computers.

The main shopping centres like Saadoon Street and Rasheed Street, and the once upmarket Mansour area and the Karrada district are now like ghosts of what they once were.

"We used to open our shops for at least 16 hours a day, but now we only open for a few hours because of the security threats," Duraid Abdullah, an electrical appliances shop owner in Karrada said. "We are facing all kinds of threats starting from being abducted for money or sectarian reasons, as well as being evicted from our shops by gangs supported by government forces."

A businessman who once owned a small textile factory that has gone bankrupt said he had not expected the coming in of a U.S. administration to be bad for business.

"The picture of Japan after World War II dominated the minds of businessmen in Iraq after occupation," he said. "Most of us thought the American invasion of Iraq was bad for many things, but it must be good for business in general and industry in particular. We were terribly wrong. The Iraqi economy was meant to be destroyed for political reasons."

Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: iraq, business

Dahr Jamail is an independent journalist who reports from Iraq.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
destroy
Posted by: rsaxto on Dec 4, 2006 1:55 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
No wonder things are so disastrous in Iraq: Americans kill and injure huge numbers of Iraqis then they destroy huge numbers of Iraqi businesses and then they install American overlords to tell the Iraqis to obey them no matter how idiotic their commands are and then they export all profits, if any, to the USA leaving most of the people in deep poverty. Get all Americans out now you stupid overlords so the Iraqis can pick up the pieces and get back to decent jobs with decent bosses. The Bushies make disaster wherever they go and whatever they do: impeach the criminals.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Success! Bush was right!
Posted by: Bic Pentameter on Dec 4, 2006 7:49 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This is precisely the type of results our government hoped for. Disrupt and disperse their industry and business, leaving the field wide open for preferred players. Towards this end, Bush never really reaches out to the Iraqi people, but rather goads them, inflaming the situation.

But corporations, per se, aren't the problem. Ma & Pa can't build bridges and space shuttles. The problem is that politics is in such dire need of funding that we allow commerce to regulate congress so that we get easy choices between name-brand commodities, spoon-fed to us so that we can remain complacent.

Our complacency, though, smells like complicity.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Success! Bush was right! Posted by: cinattra
» You missed the point Posted by: Bic Pentameter
» RE: You missed the point Posted by: yellow
And the MSM says...
Posted by: MonkeyBoy on Dec 4, 2006 8:10 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
And the MSM says it's the Iraqis fault for not taking responsibility for the chaos that we created. What a load of crap. It's repeated hourly on the major news networks.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

greed kills
Posted by: Gregor on Dec 4, 2006 8:18 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I hope these rich people have enough money now because they are killing our economy now. Behold, the dollar is dropping!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: greed kills Posted by: rwa
» RE: greed kills Posted by: albrechtkrausse
» RE: greed kills Posted by: rwa
According to plan....
Posted by: Schnookums on Dec 4, 2006 8:42 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Bic here (comment above), definitely has the right idea. What we all need to start getting through to people is; the progress and direction in Iraq is going according to plan. Much attention and criticism is paid to the hypothesis that this stupid administration does not have a plan…but the truth of the matter is, the President is savvy, his advisers are competent, and they are executing their (diabolically shitty) plan as written. Let us hope that the 110th has a plan to at least put up some sizable roadblocks on the road we travel (or dig a few potholes and pray the wheels will start coming off on their own).

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

James Petras:
Posted by: rwa on Dec 4, 2006 11:11 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"Baker’s Iraq Study Group proposes an alternative way of defending and enhancing the US Empire. More specifically the Group seeks to ‘stabilize’ Iraq in order to open the Middle East for US financial investors and petroleum companies. This strategy is severely constrained by a formidable bloc led by the Jewish Lobby with far reaching influence in the mass media, the Congress and Senate and their committee chairpersons especially in the Democratic Party.

While neither the Baker Group nor the ‘Israel Firsters’ represent a pro-democracy alternative to empire building, it is important to note one significant difference. The Jewish Lobby is acting directly and consistently for a foreign colonial power, which is beyond the reach of American voters, the constraints of the US Constitution, international law. Equally important, Israel and its US Lobby is largely unmoved by the death and injury of US soldiers in Iraq and the squandering of the US taxpayers’ money. This is reinforced by the fact that less than 2/10 of 1 percent (0.2%) of the US soldiers in Iraq are Jewish (predominantly immigrants from Eastern Europe) and probably very few of those are on the front lines. Far more young American Jews volunteer to serve in the Israeli Defense Forces...

The Baker Group, in contrast, has a very heterogeneous group of supporters – including a few anti-war democrats, military officials offended by Zionist-Pentagon manipulation, sectors of the media, several petrol and financial moguls, and sectors of the electorate. While the Bush Administration has shredded the Constitution and corrupted the electoral system, we still have space and voice to articulate our opposition to the White House and the Jewish Lobby, as opposed to our incapacity to influence the Israeli state. In so far as the Baker proposals advance toward a rapprochement with Iran and Syria it weakens the capacity of Israel and its Lobby to plunge us into another Middle East war, at least temporarily. Insofar as the Baker proposals move toward a timetable for withdrawing US troops, it opens space for accelerating and deepening the troop reduction. The almost total absence of the Left and “progressives” from this impending power struggle, given its world-historic significance and consequence, is in large part attributable to the influence which Jewish progressives exercise on the anti-war movement. Their refusal to recognize the Jewish Lobby as the prime obstacle and major opponent of a new US Mid East policy cripples any effective public protest.

Because of the refusal of the peace movement to take a stand and confront the Zionist Lobby, it is condemned to playing a passive ‘spectator role’ in the ‘Baker versus-Lobby’ battle for control over US Middle East policy... Hopefully as the ‘heavyweights’ at the top joust and clamor, space will open for a real debate from below, which will supersede their debate on the ‘best way to manage the war and the empire’ and propose the immediate withdrawal of troops as part of ‘a grand settlement’ among democratic people. Real peace in the Middle East can only come about with the closing of foreign military bases, the ending of Israel’s colonial occupation and public control or nationalization of energy resources and the separation of church/synagogue/mosque and state."
http://www.informationclearin ghouse.info/article15800.htm

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Business in Iraq
Posted by: dougo on Dec 4, 2006 4:27 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Most Iraqi businesses have collapsed under the weight of U.S.-backed economic laws, the breakdown of security, lack of electricity and fuel, and soaring inflation. MISSION ACCOMPLISHED!!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

NPR is calling for more troops and ignoring the corporate corruption
Posted by: thoughtcriminal on Dec 4, 2006 7:20 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
On NPR today, they had a general on who said that 'more troops will lead to success and democracy'. NPR didn't present any opposing views, just this general. That's not news, that's propaganda! There was no mention of 'bring the troops home now', only this general. Cokie Roberts and crew are war cheerleaders - and they still refuse to mention the words 'oil' and 'Iraq' in the same broadcast. As far as the corrupt corporate contractors and the ripoff of Iraq's oil wealth - not a peep!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Sawitcoming
Posted by: Sawitcoming on Dec 8, 2006 6:29 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Baker a longtime threat to freedom. As HW Bush's Sec. of State and then a partner in the Carlyle Group, he knows and deals with Bin Laden before and since 9/11. He is a consummate oil man first and a public servant only as it serves Big Oil's interests. That is how it has been for decades. He and HG Bush should have been made to resign from the Carlyle Group years ago. Also he was Bush's point man in Florida during the 2000 debacle.

Now we are appointing him HEAD of a committee on what to do when the 2nd largest oil reserves are at stake!! Oh Please, the American people are such idiots. Talk about the fox and the hen house. We need the oil. We are truly not willing to do without it. The wealthy are not willing to go broke.

yes we can die for it and we have no choice. We will argue about gays and stem cells while our young people die for their profits.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement