Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Body Armor for Dogs: Media Hype Creates Yet Another Need

By Nina Berman, AlterNet. Posted November 30, 2006.


Patriotic and misguided fervor saddles police dogs with unnecessary and pricey protection.
11302006story
Advertisement

Considering the multitude of challenges facing Americans today -- from homelessness and hunger to global warming and health care, not to mention the war with Iraq -- it's comforting to know that concerned citizens, corporations and the federal government are shelling out money to buy bulletproof vests for dogs.

At $500 to $1,800 a vest, the protection does not come cheap.

The Department of Homeland Security, as part of its Urban Area Security Initiative, granted Columbus, Ohio $7,348 to purchase eleven bulletproof vests for their dogs.

In July, the Breeders Dog Food company wheeled out it's "Protect a Hero" campaign, twinned with a promotion for Active Dog, a new line of dog food, so that dogs in Los Angeles, San Francisco and Sacramento are now Kevlar wrapped. The company has promised to give vests to 100 California dogs. Local Wal-Marts in Arizona have also raised money to armor their community canines.

And in Orange Park, Florida, a suburb of Jacksonville, members of the Ladies Auxiliary of the local VFW post took time out from their more established efforts like the patriot pen competition to raise $1,000 so that Santos, a strapping German Shepherd from the Czech Republic, could feel safe in a vest from Point Blank, a Florida armor and military supply company.

Sgt. Mike Seymour, the dog's handler, said Santos hadn't actually used the vest in the past year, as it tends to restrict his movement and distract him from finding marijuana. But, Seymour says he keeps the vest in his car, "just in case."

The Santos story has inspired surrounding communities to do the same for their canine patrols, said Sara Ruddick of the Auxiliary. And when Orange Park expands its unit to four dogs, the ladies vow to outfit each one.

Stories like this are popping up across the country as the vests gain popularity from Arizona to Rhode Island, yet no studies have ever been conducted proving that canines are safer Kevlar wrapped.

It's a great PR thing, " said Joan Hess of the United States Police Canine Association, the largest association of canine handlers with 3,000 members and growing each year. "We lose more to heat exhaustion than to actual killing."

Even if the vests can offer some protection, they are often too impractical for the dogs to wear.

Because the vests weigh so much, the dogs rarely wear them inside patrol cars, Hess said. And they make the dogs uncomfortably warm. To remedy this, some vest manufacturers are creating pockets for ice to cool the dogs down, but the ice packs also add weight. Hess' group urges people to raise money for 'hot dog box" containers, which are rigged to the police vehicle, have temperature indicators and can pop doors in case of emergencies. The K9 Hot-n Pop pro retails for $849.00 without accessories. Sound excessive? According to the company website, "heavy demand is causing a 6-8 week shipping delay.

So what is really going on with this armor-a-dog craze?

According to Charlie Mesloh, a former dog handler, and currently, Director of the Weapons and Equipment Research Institute at Florida Gulf Coast University, the armored dog phenomenon began in 1998 with the shooting death of a New Jersey dog named Solo.

Solo, a 4-year-old German Shepherd with the Monmouth County Sheriffs' Department, was sent to apprehend an armed robbery suspect and alleged member of the Black Liberation Army. In the standoff, Solo was shot in the eye and killed. (A bulletproof vest would not have saved him.) He was laid to rest in a funeral attended by more than 1,000 mourners. A bagpipe band played Amazing Grace. An American flag was draped on his casket. Dozens of print and television media outlets covered the story. A full-fledged media frenzy was born.


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: bulletproof vest, canine, dog

Nina Berman is a photographer and the author of Purple Hearts: Back From Iraq.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Damn!
Posted by: YinRising on Nov 30, 2006 12:22 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"Sgt. Mike Seymour, the dog's handler, said Santos hadn't actually used the vest in the past year, as it tends to restrict his movement and distract him from finding marijuana."

While I'm not usually in favor of supporting the Military Industrial Complex, if it will help keep the dogs from finding my stash, well then suit 'em up. :-)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Damn! Posted by: rsaxto
» RE: Damn! Posted by: nonaste
DOGS
Posted by: rsaxto on Nov 30, 2006 12:30 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
How often do those DOGS Cheney/Bush wear their body armor?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Nunya
Posted by: ryazbeck on Nov 30, 2006 12:38 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
These dogs actually have bounties put on them by drug dealers and drug lords, very pricey bounties, which puts them at a much greater risk than they already are. Also, it can also take years to train a dog like this to be an effective unit, so I'm not really sure why its a problem to provide them with added protection.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Nunya Posted by: rsaxto
» Two questions.. Posted by: OpinionsGetOld
» RE: Two questions.. Posted by: ryazbeck
another question...
Posted by: jack alexander on Nov 30, 2006 3:02 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
anyone else besides me like dog tacos?
i know a great place on calle primera in tijuana that serves them...
3 for a buck...or 10 pesos whichever comes first...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: another question... Posted by: colinmeister
» RE: another question... Posted by: waves999
» RE: another question... Posted by: albrechtkrausse
you people are sick
Posted by: SekhmetsatRa on Nov 30, 2006 3:41 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
You wanna eat dogs? move.
You don't like police dogs? two letters:F_O
Dogs evolved with us, helping us hunt, herd, and more recently , SEE, walk, just help humans in soooo many ways.
the blatant hatred of law enforcement shown here, even if it is "just a dog" makes me vomit.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: you people are sick Posted by: waves999
» RE: you people are sick Posted by: jaby
» Please... Posted by: JoshuaLudd
» Agreed Posted by: OpinionsGetOld
» RE: Agreed Posted by: harris
» Sick? Posted by: VisionQuest
» RE: Sick? Posted by: SekhmetsatRa
» RE: you people are sick Posted by: ArtemInox
» RE: you people are sick Posted by: ShoShenQ
For fucks sake...
Posted by: Colin on Nov 30, 2006 3:52 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It's stories like this that make people (and I mean foreigners) laugh at America.

Unless, of course, you think about the rates of poverty, health and education inequality etc. Then it's just a shame.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: For fucks sake... Posted by: waves999
This was the vision that first came to my mind.
Posted by: WhatNow? on Nov 30, 2006 4:13 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"permanently ingrained in American history in 1963 when police in Birmingham, Alabama turned dogs"

The second would be the gestapo rounding up people with their german shepards in hand.

I love dogs but the only dog worse than alot of police dogs would be a rabid one.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

....
Posted by: JoshuaLudd on Nov 30, 2006 6:21 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
SPEND THE FUCKING MONEY ON BODY ARMOR FOR OUR SOLDIERS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! THEY NEED IT A HELL OF A LOT MORE!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: .... Posted by: rsaxto
This is news?
Posted by: MAD on Nov 30, 2006 7:10 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"I like table tennis and shoot dog"

Well at least they'll be safe from the likes of Borat. Just another misappropriation of tax dollars but I don't know why these vests in particular should get people in a lather. Taken a look at the average police cruiser or fleet of 4x4's your local sherrif's dept. flashes around town in?

I remember the first time I saw a Vail police officer driving a Saab 9000. I nearly puked. They have since done away with the Saab only to replace it with the Dodge Durango or some other gas guzzler. If I'm not mistaken one of those vehicles goes for around $35K. Vail is one thing but the truth is that police forces around the country drive those hulking, expensive and entirley unnecessary vehicles.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

This is not blind hatred of law enforcement.
Posted by: lamar on Nov 30, 2006 7:14 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"You don't like police dogs? two letters:F_O"

You go get 'em!! Why would anyone be against a failed policy that has wasted billions of dollars, imprisoned close the 1/5 of the world's population (and that's just in the US) and has absolutely zero results? To top it off, we are seeing increasing militarization of our police, with heavy arms that were once the speciality of SWAT teams facing grave situations. Now that our policy has turned Marijuana into gold, everything is grave. So, while I can understand your reaction in defense of animals, it doesn't appear that you've even started to think this through.

This isn't a blatant hatred of law enforcement. This is a blatant hatred of a policy that has destroyed millions of lives. In exchange, we have a society where anybody who wants drugs can very easily get drugs. The solution isn't to anthropomorphize warrior dogs. The solution is to devalue drugs. Though I'm sure we'll be pissing into the fan for many years, and we'll cause thousands if not millions of lives to be destroyed.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Poochie armor
Posted by: willymack on Nov 30, 2006 8:30 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
People will find any number of ways to throw away their money. I prefer to spend what money I have on motorcycles. My 100 lb. German Shepherd is so sweet and non-threatening, I doubt I need to protect him from anyone, besides, kindness and affection work a lot better and are a lot cheaper than 1800 dollar armor which my dog would chew to shreds, given half a chance.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Poochie armor Posted by: babs
» RE: Poochie armor Posted by: Monkey Business
If you shoot, hit, hurt, kick, or kill a police dog
Posted by: albrechtkrausse on Nov 30, 2006 8:50 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
you will/can be charged with assault of a police officer (or if the dog dies murder.) I know you think I'm kidding but its true. One of the oddest things is that a cop dog is considered by most state laws as an actual police officer. (You can see how valuable the elites consider a police officer- they are worth as much as an animal.) As far as I know I haven't see any high-level court cases dealing with this. I can't imagine that Western jurisprudence would equate a dog with a person but you never know. Also, if a dog is an officer, if the dog sics you does he bark out your rights before he bites you? Oh that's right, we have no more rights anymore. Not a problem then....

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Why hasn't anyone mentioned THIS?!
Posted by: JBravoEcho11 on Nov 30, 2006 10:06 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Why are people spending so much money on police dogs, often used for our useless War on Drugs, when our SOLDIERS in IRAQ don't have enough protection. Remember Rumsfeld's answer to that? Oh right he didn't have one. Maybe if people thought about it they wouldn't care about a dog most likely not to get hurt and give the money to a soldier in need. Those are our guys and girls out there. The price America places on its pets is ridiculous.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Lassie or Cujo?
Posted by: medbear on Nov 30, 2006 11:52 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Service dogs are as close to partners in most services that something or -body can get without being a full fledged partner. They are specialized tools/"partners" with armed services, rescue services and law enforcement.

The specialities can be roughly divided in 2 groups; First detection, where the dogs superior (to ours) senses is utilized. This is used for a number of situation, from rescue (avalanche, search etc) to finding illegal or dangerous substances like narcotics and explosives. In the second group the dog is a weapon, utilizing its agility, tenacity, force of bite, and its ability to stand pain. As a weapon, the dog is also a fantastic deterrant; a snarling, growling canine monster would make most of us think twice about provoking it further.

There is another factor that makes dogs valuable, and that is that they are of less value. More expendable. Not in the negligent way, but in priority between serviceman and servicedog when one has to take harm to protect the other. This does not mean that dogs should not be protected from unnecessary harm, but the risk of harm is part and parcel with the services many dogs are intended to provide. For dogs as weapons this is evident, but this is also true for dogs as detectors, e.g. mine search dogs.

Unfortunately, the general misconception in many societies - often created by mass media, or the "Disney effect" as it is laso named - about dogs as "furry humans", has made this distinction more and more extinct. The image of Lassie, the stories of "my dog understands me", and the treatment of dogs as humans has taken a strong hold, even on proffesional dog trainers and users.

One forgets that this is an animal, with its own psyche and abilities. A search dog has no notion of being of service to humanity. It is playing "catch". That is how it is trained. It associates smells of narcotics/explosives/humans with games and treats. And does so very good. A guard/patrol dog may be trained in the same way; the best ones are trained to act on command and to stay under control. The worst ones are just beaten and treated so that they are afraid of - and thus angry at - any unknown person. In the trade such dogs are often called "junkyard dogs".

But no matter how much and how well a dog is trained, it is an animal, and it reacts to unknown situation as an animal. The challenge for any dog handler with a weapon-dog is to keep agressivity-on-command at the right level, but not letting it slip into uncontrollable agressivity-as-nature. But you never really know for absolutely sure how the dog will react. For search dogs, the challenge is to maintain a stable, amiable and friendly dog, not forgetting that part while training for the dection part. Yet, the dog's "personality" might surprise you under the right - or wrong - circumstances.

These were the "good dog, good man" sides of the problem. There is, unfortunately, the sides where the dog handler is not fit to train a dog, but still is allowed to. It is sufficient to state that beating or any other abuse of a dog will never bring any good. And there are dogs which turns out not to be fit for service, but are kept because of the substantial cost related replacement, hoping the dog handler can "train it off". Sometimes it works, sometimes it doesn't.

The Lassie-factor also have impact on the public. A dog that behaves "badly" brings people to the other extreme, the impression of Cujo - the evil, calculating monster dog of cheap horror movies. This is as misleading as the Lassie impression; dogs react, they do not calculate, speculate, ponder, plan.

A dog can be a great companion, a great service provider and an integral and valuable part of the armed forces, law enforcement and rescue service. But it is still a dog. It doesn't send you postcards.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Lassie or Cujo? Posted by: Knowmad
» RE: Lassie or Cujo? Posted by: medbear
» RE: Lassie or Cujo? Posted by: Knowmad
» RE: Lassie or Cujo? Posted by: medbear
» RE: Lassie or Cujo? Posted by: Knowmad
Corporations and gov't, together forever.
Posted by: Reader11722 on Nov 30, 2006 1:07 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Wonder which corporation is supplying these vests? Same ones that keep this story alive so more gov't agencies purchase equipment for their dogs. (Do we even have enough vests in Iraq yet?). Corporations and gov't are merely quid-pro-quo whorehouses sold to the highest bidder. When the gov't needs illegal wire-taps, Verizon and Sprint allow them secret rooms to listen in on calls. When Haliburton (and KBR) need more revenue, the gov't hands out no-bid contracts. When the gov't dislikes literature, Amazon and Wikipedia ban the book "America Deceived". America Deceived (book) We The People have had our gov't sold out from beneath us... to the dogs, no less.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Remember you can't have a police state...
Posted by: ignition on Nov 30, 2006 1:36 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...without the police! I can guarantee you there wouldn't be rich people if they didn't have the force required to keep them in power. Although Napolean was correct when he stated religion is how the rich keep from being murdered by the poor.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I LOVE POOCHES, BUT...
Posted by: alicelillie on Dec 1, 2006 10:55 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I love dogs and I think every one of them is cute.

But, *this* is over the top.

So much money is being spent ramping up the police state, and as a libertarian I oppose almost all of it. But this is crazy. Almost a grand to buy a dog protection and then not even put it on him?

We need a little Robin Hood here; take all this funding away from this (and the war) and return it to *you,* the taxpayer.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Has anyone checked with the SPCA?
Posted by: dadchad on Dec 1, 2006 12:00 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It thrills me to pieces to know that "our" K9 forces are protected in their drug and butt-sniffing patrol work. As a dog lover, however, I would also be concerned that the restrictive character of such protective devices would also make it unduly difficult for "our" furry officers to perform natural recreactional activities, such as licking their own genitalia. Perhaps we ought to call in the SPCA to investigate this.....

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]