COMMENTS: 56
Body Armor for Dogs: Media Hype Creates Yet Another Need
Sign up to stay up to date on the latest headlines via email.
At $500 to $1,800 a vest, the protection does not come cheap.
The Department of Homeland Security, as part of its Urban Area Security Initiative, granted Columbus, Ohio $7,348 to purchase eleven bulletproof vests for their dogs.
In July, the Breeders Dog Food company wheeled out it's "Protect a Hero" campaign, twinned with a promotion for Active Dog, a new line of dog food, so that dogs in Los Angeles, San Francisco and Sacramento are now Kevlar wrapped. The company has promised to give vests to 100 California dogs. Local Wal-Marts in Arizona have also raised money to armor their community canines.
And in Orange Park, Florida, a suburb of Jacksonville, members of the Ladies Auxiliary of the local VFW post took time out from their more established efforts like the patriot pen competition to raise $1,000 so that Santos, a strapping German Shepherd from the Czech Republic, could feel safe in a vest from Point Blank, a Florida armor and military supply company.
Sgt. Mike Seymour, the dog's handler, said Santos hadn't actually used the vest in the past year, as it tends to restrict his movement and distract him from finding marijuana. But, Seymour says he keeps the vest in his car, "just in case."
The Santos story has inspired surrounding communities to do the same for their canine patrols, said Sara Ruddick of the Auxiliary. And when Orange Park expands its unit to four dogs, the ladies vow to outfit each one.
Stories like this are popping up across the country as the vests gain popularity from Arizona to Rhode Island, yet no studies have ever been conducted proving that canines are safer Kevlar wrapped.
It's a great PR thing, " said Joan Hess of the United States Police Canine Association, the largest association of canine handlers with 3,000 members and growing each year. "We lose more to heat exhaustion than to actual killing."
Even if the vests can offer some protection, they are often too impractical for the dogs to wear.
Because the vests weigh so much, the dogs rarely wear them inside patrol cars, Hess said. And they make the dogs uncomfortably warm. To remedy this, some vest manufacturers are creating pockets for ice to cool the dogs down, but the ice packs also add weight. Hess' group urges people to raise money for 'hot dog box" containers, which are rigged to the police vehicle, have temperature indicators and can pop doors in case of emergencies. The K9 Hot-n Pop pro retails for $849.00 without accessories. Sound excessive? According to the company website, "heavy demand is causing a 6-8 week shipping delay.
So what is really going on with this armor-a-dog craze?
According to Charlie Mesloh, a former dog handler, and currently, Director of the Weapons and Equipment Research Institute at Florida Gulf Coast University, the armored dog phenomenon began in 1998 with the shooting death of a New Jersey dog named Solo.
Solo, a 4-year-old German Shepherd with the Monmouth County Sheriffs' Department, was sent to apprehend an armed robbery suspect and alleged member of the Black Liberation Army. In the standoff, Solo was shot in the eye and killed. (A bulletproof vest would not have saved him.) He was laid to rest in a funeral attended by more than 1,000 mourners. A bagpipe band played Amazing Grace. An American flag was draped on his casket. Dozens of print and television media outlets covered the story. A full-fledged media frenzy was born.
"Once media organizations realized the appeal of police canines produced by the Solo incident, they looked for similar stories in their local news markets," writes Mesloh in the October 2002 FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin. "By constructing news stories that focused on canine protective vests, the media generated a public perception that such gear was a necessity and that those responsible for the protection of others should be equally protected.
"In addition, no reports of a canine ballistic vest saving the life of a police animal have occurred in the United States," Mesloh wrote.
Since then, there has been one report in 2003 by a canine handler from Auburn, Washington, claiming his dog Blitz was saved by a bulletproof vest.
The armoring of police dogs and the good will campaigns by concerned citizens to protect man's best friend may be well-intentioned, but it also disguises a far more serious issue. Police dogs, trained and sometimes bred aggressively, are becoming more prevalent in the nation's law enforcement agencies and they are biting, mauling and assaulting innocent people.
In October, Myra Gutierrez was brutally attacked by Zorro, a police dog with the Hialeah, Florida police department. Police were searching for car thief near Gutierrez's home and when Gutierrez went outside to see what the commotion was, Zorro bit her breasts and her arms and dragged her on the street. The dog did not respond to any commands, and police could not pry it's jaws open to save Gutierrez. The dog was finally subdued when officers punched it in the head. According to the local CBS4 news, the dog is still on police duty. Gutierrez is considering legal action.
Earlier this year in Indiana, schoolgirl Courtney McGarry was petting a dog from New Albany's K9 unit when it bit her in the face requiring 11 stitches. The dog had been brought to school to demonstrate its drug sniffing abilities.
In New Mexico, late last year, Sheriff's Deputy Heather Schreckendgus, had to shoot one of her department's canines after it mistook her for a suspect and bit through her arm. She is now suing the Bemalillo department.
People have been bitten by dogs while handcuffed, and one man had his penis severed by a St. Petersburg, Florida police dog named Scooby.
As more and more communities recruit canines into the war on drugs and now the war on terror -- canines are patrolling subways, trains, airports -- it's worth remembering some dog history.
The image of snarling German Shepherds was permanently ingrained in American history in 1963 when police in Birmingham, Alabama turned dogs and water cannons on civil rights marchers.
Forty years later we saw dogs being used in Abu Ghraib by corrections workers on loan from American prisons.
In 2004 Berkeley, California turned down a request from the police department to reinstate the canine unit, citing not just cost but perception.
"There is a stigma associated with the dogs when they were used to terrorize the free speech movement in the 60s and 70s," then Commissioner Mike Sheen told the Daily Cal newspaper. He also said that people of color voiced opposition to the canine unit, as they are often the ones targeted.
Stay up to date with the latest AlterNet headlines via email
Comments are closed-
Posted by: YinRising on Nov 30, 2006 12:22 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
While I'm not usually in favor of supporting the Military Industrial Complex, if it will help keep the dogs from finding my stash, well then suit 'em up. :-)
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Damn!
Posted by: rsaxto
» RE: Damn!
Posted by: nonaste
Comments are closed-
Posted by: rsaxto on Nov 30, 2006 12:30 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Bush and Cheney will both be wearing body armor soon
Posted by: ignition
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ryazbeck on Nov 30, 2006 12:38 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Nunya
Posted by: rsaxto
» Two questions..
Posted by: OpinionsGetOld
» RE: Two questions..
Posted by: ryazbeck
» Now... is there any documentation of this? How many times is it known to have happened?
Posted by: JoshuaLudd
Comments are closed-
Posted by: jack alexander on Nov 30, 2006 3:02 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
i know a great place on calle primera in tijuana that serves them...
3 for a buck...or 10 pesos whichever comes first...
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: another question...
Posted by: colinmeister
» RE: another question...
Posted by: waves999
» RE: another question...
Posted by: albrechtkrausse
Comments are closed-
Posted by: SekhmetsatRa on Nov 30, 2006 3:41 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
You don't like police dogs? two letters:F_O
Dogs evolved with us, helping us hunt, herd, and more recently , SEE, walk, just help humans in soooo many ways.
the blatant hatred of law enforcement shown here, even if it is "just a dog" makes me vomit.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: you people are sick
Posted by: waves999
» RE: you people are sick
Posted by: jaby
» many of our laws are STUPID and RACIST
Posted by: deborama
» RE: many of our laws are STUPID and RACIST
Posted by: SekhmetsatRa
» Please...
Posted by: JoshuaLudd
» RE: many of our laws are STUPID and RACIST
Posted by: bichomau
» Agreed
Posted by: OpinionsGetOld
» RE: Agreed
Posted by: harris
» Sick?
Posted by: VisionQuest
» RE: Sick?
Posted by: SekhmetsatRa
» And they are still put in harms way to protect people.
Posted by: JoshuaLudd
» I would rather dogs be on my menu...
Posted by: ignition
» RE: you people are sick
Posted by: ArtemInox
» RE: you people are sick
Posted by: ShoShenQ
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Colin on Nov 30, 2006 3:52 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Unless, of course, you think about the rates of poverty, health and education inequality etc. Then it's just a shame.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: For fucks sake...
Posted by: waves999
Comments are closed-
Posted by: WhatNow? on Nov 30, 2006 4:13 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The second would be the gestapo rounding up people with their german shepards in hand.
I love dogs but the only dog worse than alot of police dogs would be a rabid one.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: This was the vision that first came to my mind.
Posted by: bichomau
Comments are closed-
Posted by: JoshuaLudd on Nov 30, 2006 6:21 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: ....
Posted by: rsaxto
Comments are closed-
Posted by: MAD on Nov 30, 2006 7:10 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Well at least they'll be safe from the likes of Borat. Just another misappropriation of tax dollars but I don't know why these vests in particular should get people in a lather. Taken a look at the average police cruiser or fleet of 4x4's your local sherrif's dept. flashes around town in?
I remember the first time I saw a Vail police officer driving a Saab 9000. I nearly puked. They have since done away with the Saab only to replace it with the Dodge Durango or some other gas guzzler. If I'm not mistaken one of those vehicles goes for around $35K. Vail is one thing but the truth is that police forces around the country drive those hulking, expensive and entirley unnecessary vehicles.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: lamar on Nov 30, 2006 7:14 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
You go get 'em!! Why would anyone be against a failed policy that has wasted billions of dollars, imprisoned close the 1/5 of the world's population (and that's just in the US) and has absolutely zero results? To top it off, we are seeing increasing militarization of our police, with heavy arms that were once the speciality of SWAT teams facing grave situations. Now that our policy has turned Marijuana into gold, everything is grave. So, while I can understand your reaction in defense of animals, it doesn't appear that you've even started to think this through.
This isn't a blatant hatred of law enforcement. This is a blatant hatred of a policy that has destroyed millions of lives. In exchange, we have a society where anybody who wants drugs can very easily get drugs. The solution isn't to anthropomorphize warrior dogs. The solution is to devalue drugs. Though I'm sure we'll be pissing into the fan for many years, and we'll cause thousands if not millions of lives to be destroyed.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: This is not blind hatred of law enforcement.
Posted by: IntnsRed
» RE: This is not blind hatred of law enforcement.
Posted by: WhatNow?
Comments are closed-
Posted by: willymack on Nov 30, 2006 8:30 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Poochie armor
Posted by: babs
» RE: Poochie armor
Posted by: Monkey Business
Comments are closed-
Posted by: albrechtkrausse on Nov 30, 2006 8:50 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Gee... but you can throw any other dog in an oven and get probation and anger management courses
Posted by: JoshuaLudd
Comments are closed-
Posted by: JBravoEcho11 on Nov 30, 2006 10:06 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Why hasn't anyone mentioned THIS?!
Posted by: lamar
Comments are closed-
Posted by: medbear on Nov 30, 2006 11:52 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The specialities can be roughly divided in 2 groups; First detection, where the dogs superior (to ours) senses is utilized. This is used for a number of situation, from rescue (avalanche, search etc) to finding illegal or dangerous substances like narcotics and explosives. In the second group the dog is a weapon, utilizing its agility, tenacity, force of bite, and its ability to stand pain. As a weapon, the dog is also a fantastic deterrant; a snarling, growling canine monster would make most of us think twice about provoking it further.
There is another factor that makes dogs valuable, and that is that they are of less value. More expendable. Not in the negligent way, but in priority between serviceman and servicedog when one has to take harm to protect the other. This does not mean that dogs should not be protected from unnecessary harm, but the risk of harm is part and parcel with the services many dogs are intended to provide. For dogs as weapons this is evident, but this is also true for dogs as detectors, e.g. mine search dogs.
Unfortunately, the general misconception in many societies - often created by mass media, or the "Disney effect" as it is laso named - about dogs as "furry humans", has made this distinction more and more extinct. The image of Lassie, the stories of "my dog understands me", and the treatment of dogs as humans has taken a strong hold, even on proffesional dog trainers and users.
One forgets that this is an animal, with its own psyche and abilities. A search dog has no notion of being of service to humanity. It is playing "catch". That is how it is trained. It associates smells of narcotics/explosives/humans with games and treats. And does so very good. A guard/patrol dog may be trained in the same way; the best ones are trained to act on command and to stay under control. The worst ones are just beaten and treated so that they are afraid of - and thus angry at - any unknown person. In the trade such dogs are often called "junkyard dogs".
But no matter how much and how well a dog is trained, it is an animal, and it reacts to unknown situation as an animal. The challenge for any dog handler with a weapon-dog is to keep agressivity-on-command at the right level, but not letting it slip into uncontrollable agressivity-as-nature. But you never really know for absolutely sure how the dog will react. For search dogs, the challenge is to maintain a stable, amiable and friendly dog, not forgetting that part while training for the dection part. Yet, the dog's "personality" might surprise you under the right - or wrong - circumstances.
These were the "good dog, good man" sides of the problem. There is, unfortunately, the sides where the dog handler is not fit to train a dog, but still is allowed to. It is sufficient to state that beating or any other abuse of a dog will never bring any good. And there are dogs which turns out not to be fit for service, but are kept because of the substantial cost related replacement, hoping the dog handler can "train it off". Sometimes it works, sometimes it doesn't.
The Lassie-factor also have impact on the public. A dog that behaves "badly" brings people to the other extreme, the impression of Cujo - the evil, calculating monster dog of cheap horror movies. This is as misleading as the Lassie impression; dogs react, they do not calculate, speculate, ponder, plan.
A dog can be a great companion, a great service provider and an integral and valuable part of the armed forces, law enforcement and rescue service. But it is still a dog. It doesn't send you postcards.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Lassie or Cujo?
Posted by: Knowmad
» RE: Lassie or Cujo?
Posted by: medbear
» RE: Lassie or Cujo?
Posted by: Knowmad
» RE: Lassie or Cujo?
Posted by: medbear
» RE: Lassie or Cujo?
Posted by: Knowmad
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Reader11722 on Nov 30, 2006 1:07 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ignition on Nov 30, 2006 1:36 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: alicelillie on Dec 1, 2006 10:55 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
But, *this* is over the top.
So much money is being spent ramping up the police state, and as a libertarian I oppose almost all of it. But this is crazy. Almost a grand to buy a dog protection and then not even put it on him?
We need a little Robin Hood here; take all this funding away from this (and the war) and return it to *you,* the taxpayer.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: dadchad on Dec 1, 2006 12:00 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: YinRising on Nov 30, 2006 12:22 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
While I'm not usually in favor of supporting the Military Industrial Complex, if it will help keep the dogs from finding my stash, well then suit 'em up. :-)
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Damn!
Posted by: rsaxto
» RE: Damn!
Posted by: nonaste
Comments are closed-
Posted by: rsaxto on Nov 30, 2006 12:30 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Bush and Cheney will both be wearing body armor soon
Posted by: ignition
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ryazbeck on Nov 30, 2006 12:38 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Nunya
Posted by: rsaxto
» Two questions..
Posted by: OpinionsGetOld
» RE: Two questions..
Posted by: ryazbeck
» Now... is there any documentation of this? How many times is it known to have happened?
Posted by: JoshuaLudd
Comments are closed-
Posted by: jack alexander on Nov 30, 2006 3:02 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
i know a great place on calle primera in tijuana that serves them...
3 for a buck...or 10 pesos whichever comes first...
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: another question...
Posted by: colinmeister
» RE: another question...
Posted by: waves999
» RE: another question...
Posted by: albrechtkrausse
Comments are closed-
Posted by: SekhmetsatRa on Nov 30, 2006 3:41 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
You don't like police dogs? two letters:F_O
Dogs evolved with us, helping us hunt, herd, and more recently , SEE, walk, just help humans in soooo many ways.
the blatant hatred of law enforcement shown here, even if it is "just a dog" makes me vomit.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: you people are sick
Posted by: waves999
» RE: you people are sick
Posted by: jaby
» many of our laws are STUPID and RACIST
Posted by: deborama
» RE: many of our laws are STUPID and RACIST
Posted by: SekhmetsatRa
» Please...
Posted by: JoshuaLudd
» RE: many of our laws are STUPID and RACIST
Posted by: bichomau
» Agreed
Posted by: OpinionsGetOld
» RE: Agreed
Posted by: harris
» Sick?
Posted by: VisionQuest
» RE: Sick?
Posted by: SekhmetsatRa
» And they are still put in harms way to protect people.
Posted by: JoshuaLudd
» I would rather dogs be on my menu...
Posted by: ignition
» RE: you people are sick
Posted by: ArtemInox
» RE: you people are sick
Posted by: ShoShenQ
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Colin on Nov 30, 2006 3:52 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Unless, of course, you think about the rates of poverty, health and education inequality etc. Then it's just a shame.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: For fucks sake...
Posted by: waves999
Comments are closed-
Posted by: WhatNow? on Nov 30, 2006 4:13 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The second would be the gestapo rounding up people with their german shepards in hand.
I love dogs but the only dog worse than alot of police dogs would be a rabid one.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: This was the vision that first came to my mind.
Posted by: bichomau
Comments are closed-
Posted by: JoshuaLudd on Nov 30, 2006 6:21 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: ....
Posted by: rsaxto
Comments are closed-
Posted by: MAD on Nov 30, 2006 7:10 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Well at least they'll be safe from the likes of Borat. Just another misappropriation of tax dollars but I don't know why these vests in particular should get people in a lather. Taken a look at the average police cruiser or fleet of 4x4's your local sherrif's dept. flashes around town in?
I remember the first time I saw a Vail police officer driving a Saab 9000. I nearly puked. They have since done away with the Saab only to replace it with the Dodge Durango or some other gas guzzler. If I'm not mistaken one of those vehicles goes for around $35K. Vail is one thing but the truth is that police forces around the country drive those hulking, expensive and entirley unnecessary vehicles.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: lamar on Nov 30, 2006 7:14 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
You go get 'em!! Why would anyone be against a failed policy that has wasted billions of dollars, imprisoned close the 1/5 of the world's population (and that's just in the US) and has absolutely zero results? To top it off, we are seeing increasing militarization of our police, with heavy arms that were once the speciality of SWAT teams facing grave situations. Now that our policy has turned Marijuana into gold, everything is grave. So, while I can understand your reaction in defense of animals, it doesn't appear that you've even started to think this through.
This isn't a blatant hatred of law enforcement. This is a blatant hatred of a policy that has destroyed millions of lives. In exchange, we have a society where anybody who wants drugs can very easily get drugs. The solution isn't to anthropomorphize warrior dogs. The solution is to devalue drugs. Though I'm sure we'll be pissing into the fan for many years, and we'll cause thousands if not millions of lives to be destroyed.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: This is not blind hatred of law enforcement.
Posted by: IntnsRed
» RE: This is not blind hatred of law enforcement.
Posted by: WhatNow?
Comments are closed-
Posted by: willymack on Nov 30, 2006 8:30 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Poochie armor
Posted by: babs
» RE: Poochie armor
Posted by: Monkey Business
Comments are closed-
Posted by: albrechtkrausse on Nov 30, 2006 8:50 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Gee... but you can throw any other dog in an oven and get probation and anger management courses
Posted by: JoshuaLudd
Comments are closed-
Posted by: JBravoEcho11 on Nov 30, 2006 10:06 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Why hasn't anyone mentioned THIS?!
Posted by: lamar
Comments are closed-
Posted by: medbear on Nov 30, 2006 11:52 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The specialities can be roughly divided in 2 groups; First detection, where the dogs superior (to ours) senses is utilized. This is used for a number of situation, from rescue (avalanche, search etc) to finding illegal or dangerous substances like narcotics and explosives. In the second group the dog is a weapon, utilizing its agility, tenacity, force of bite, and its ability to stand pain. As a weapon, the dog is also a fantastic deterrant; a snarling, growling canine monster would make most of us think twice about provoking it further.
There is another factor that makes dogs valuable, and that is that they are of less value. More expendable. Not in the negligent way, but in priority between serviceman and servicedog when one has to take harm to protect the other. This does not mean that dogs should not be protected from unnecessary harm, but the risk of harm is part and parcel with the services many dogs are intended to provide. For dogs as weapons this is evident, but this is also true for dogs as detectors, e.g. mine search dogs.
Unfortunately, the general misconception in many societies - often created by mass media, or the "Disney effect" as it is laso named - about dogs as "furry humans", has made this distinction more and more extinct. The image of Lassie, the stories of "my dog understands me", and the treatment of dogs as humans has taken a strong hold, even on proffesional dog trainers and users.
One forgets that this is an animal, with its own psyche and abilities. A search dog has no notion of being of service to humanity. It is playing "catch". That is how it is trained. It associates smells of narcotics/explosives/humans with games and treats. And does so very good. A guard/patrol dog may be trained in the same way; the best ones are trained to act on command and to stay under control. The worst ones are just beaten and treated so that they are afraid of - and thus angry at - any unknown person. In the trade such dogs are often called "junkyard dogs".
But no matter how much and how well a dog is trained, it is an animal, and it reacts to unknown situation as an animal. The challenge for any dog handler with a weapon-dog is to keep agressivity-on-command at the right level, but not letting it slip into uncontrollable agressivity-as-nature. But you never really know for absolutely sure how the dog will react. For search dogs, the challenge is to maintain a stable, amiable and friendly dog, not forgetting that part while training for the dection part. Yet, the dog's "personality" might surprise you under the right - or wrong - circumstances.
These were the "good dog, good man" sides of the problem. There is, unfortunately, the sides where the dog handler is not fit to train a dog, but still is allowed to. It is sufficient to state that beating or any other abuse of a dog will never bring any good. And there are dogs which turns out not to be fit for service, but are kept because of the substantial cost related replacement, hoping the dog handler can "train it off". Sometimes it works, sometimes it doesn't.
The Lassie-factor also have impact on the public. A dog that behaves "badly" brings people to the other extreme, the impression of Cujo - the evil, calculating monster dog of cheap horror movies. This is as misleading as the Lassie impression; dogs react, they do not calculate, speculate, ponder, plan.
A dog can be a great companion, a great service provider and an integral and valuable part of the armed forces, law enforcement and rescue service. But it is still a dog. It doesn't send you postcards.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Lassie or Cujo?
Posted by: Knowmad
» RE: Lassie or Cujo?
Posted by: medbear
» RE: Lassie or Cujo?
Posted by: Knowmad
» RE: Lassie or Cujo?
Posted by: medbear
» RE: Lassie or Cujo?
Posted by: Knowmad
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Reader11722 on Nov 30, 2006 1:07 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ignition on Nov 30, 2006 1:36 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: alicelillie on Dec 1, 2006 10:55 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
But, *this* is over the top.
So much money is being spent ramping up the police state, and as a libertarian I oppose almost all of it. But this is crazy. Almost a grand to buy a dog protection and then not even put it on him?
We need a little Robin Hood here; take all this funding away from this (and the war) and return it to *you,* the taxpayer.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: dadchad on Dec 1, 2006 12:00 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Vancouver's Games Will Be the Gayest Olympics Ever
Trial Begins for Activist Who Fought to Protect Federal Lands from Drilling -- Join the Protest
Starbucks' Cop-Out to Gun Nuts: Customers Served Coffee While Strapped




