Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Israelis and Palestinians Destroy the 'No Partner for Peace' Canard

By Evan Derkacz, AlterNet. Posted December 2, 2006.


A new documentary that looks at the people most affected by the Israeli-Palestinian divide reminds us that lasting peace will come from popular movements, not political leaders.
encounter point

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

More stories by Evan Derkacz

Get AlterNet in
your mailbox!

 
Advertisement

Virtually everyone knows what the end of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict will look like -- technically, at least. Still, it would take a healthy dose of political courage and a pile of luck for significant progress to occur anytime soon. The official charter of Palestine's elected leadership includes portions of the Protocols of the Elders of Zion, while Israeli PM, Ehud Olmert, recently appointed an anti-Arab racist with genocidal fantasies as his deputy prime minister. The Road Map is stalled and, governmentally speaking, the peace process has flatlined. But then little, if any, progress was ever born in government anyway.

Into this apparently hopeless situation comes Encounter Point, an award-winning feature film documenting the movements that bridge the Israeli-Palestinian divide on the ground, among the people most affected. Filmmakers Ronit Avni and Julia Bacha (cowriter and editor of Control Room) have trained a refreshingly sharp eye on the detail and meaning in their surroundings as well as in their subjects -- a regrettably rare trait in a political documentary. But the question of why art and politics have filed for a separation is a different story.

The Bereaved Families Forum, a major focus of the film's energies, is comprised of families from both sides, all of whom have suffered the death of one or more loved ones to the conflict. Rather than resort to more violence, these people have each asked themselves, in one form or another, what Robi Damelin does in the film: "So what do you do with this pain? Do you take it and look for revenge and keep the whole cycle of violence going, or do you choose another path to prevent further death and further pain to other parents?"

On the other side of the border lives Ali Abu Awwad, a young Palestinian man whose character almost doesn't work on paper. After years of opposing the Israeli Occupation in the stone-throwing era of the '80s and '90s, Awwad was in Saudi Arabia when he received the news that his brother had been killed by an Israeli soldier. Awwad was there, ironically, seeking medical treatment for an Israeli-delivered bullet-wound himself.

Having asked himself the question above, Awwad chose reconciliation, resisting pressure to do otherwise -- not to mention his reward: "great status" and "the right to hate." But Encounter's rich cast of characters goes beyond classical progressive heroes like Robi and Ali, to include the likes of Shlomo Zagman, a settlement-born Israeli who once advocated for the deportation of Palestinians to neighboring countries.

Zagman now heads up the more pragmatic-minded reconciliation group, Movement for Realistic Religious Zionism which seeks to convince religious Jews that reconciliation is in their best interest. The MRRZ is roughly akin to a moderate Democrat who argues that the War in Iraq must end because it was poorly planned and expensive, as opposed to being a fundamentally errant policy.

One of the reasons you can, and will, show this film to conservative members of your family is because it refuses to incapacitate itself with the hot-button issues of history and negotiations, opting to highlight the human side of the conflict. Frankly, this decision may piss off activists on both sides, but every person who watches the film will leave with an appreciation for the humanity of both Israelis and Palestinians, a sense that both people love their children, argue with their parents, are stubborn, and like food.


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: israel, movies, palestine

Evan Derkacz an AlterNet editor and writer of PEEK, the blog of blogs.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
drawbacks to relying on history
Posted by: asilsfable on Dec 2, 2006 12:50 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"it refuses to incapacitate itself with the hot-button issues of history and negotiations, opting to highlight the human side of the conflict"

There are several drawbacks to relying on history as a method of forecasting the future:

One, that history teaches that no one learns from history and that most people repeat the same mistakes over and over because that's what they know or it's the only thing they've learned.

Two, that history is drawn upon as a road to follow and not to walk away from.

There are many things in our modern society that have no precedent. The internet is but one example. To forge ahead with new ideals and an untried vision for the betterment of all takes an iron will and not a little courage.

Where is the precedent for the Truth and Reconcilliation Commission? Where was the precendent for the Nuremburg Trials? The League of Nations (prototype of the UN)?

What the Israelis should learn is that leaving things the way they are or following the old path of "devoring them whole" is working less and less. Soon, it probably won't work at all.

It's time to design a future that benefits all. It's not just rhetoric or liberal fantasy. Or if you want history, check out Martin Luther King, Gandhi, Archbishop Desmond Tutu and a host of others trying something different for a change.

If we were all like our parents, we'd still be cavemen.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

more
Posted by: rsaxto on Dec 2, 2006 1:54 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Even more than, "If we were all still like our parents we'd still be cavemen" ; If we were all still like our distant ancestors in belief and action we'd still be apes. If a fight is about ancient settlement patterns instead of about current reality then that war is simply immorality writ huge. Settle fights with decency and negotiation not bombs.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Very brave article, Evan. Congratulations
Posted by: HeroesAll on Dec 2, 2006 2:48 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Thank you, Evan, for a balanced and sensible article. We need to hear more about this sort of action, rather than confrontational 'us against them' atrocities that only stir up hatred.

I'm wondering how much acerbic comment this one will generate. The Israel-Palestine issue is such a running sore, and everyone has a strong opinion about it, which, along with the history, is what makes the problem so damn intractable.

But what is true is that the only way the problem will ever begin to be resolved is for the participants to let go of hate, and let go of history, and attempt a reconciliation. Yes, innocents on both sides have been killed, so why do both sides use that as a justification for killing more innocents?

Tragedy rouses the passions like little else, and it's human to want to lash out. But those who are strong enough to resist that urge are the real heroes, and I admire them greatly. It's so easy to be lured into the adrenaline-fuelled pit of confrontational temptation, so hard to see 'the enemy' as victims themselves.

For an interesting aside, here is a selection of revenge quotes: it seems we're not the first to realise that it poisons. Fancy. And here's another from Confucius, whose thoughts are always apposite: Before you embark on a journey of revenge, dig two graves. More Confucian wisdom can be found starting here. Perhaps if we all read more Confucius, or at least pondered these thoughts, there would be less violence.

BTW, that flashy ad thingie is incredibly annoying. Really very very annoying indeed.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

A very helpful perspective - political leaders are generally timid
Posted by: thoughtcriminal on Dec 2, 2006 5:33 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Jimmy Carter's new book (Peace Not Apartheid) is also worth reading, though the Congressional Democrats are so alarmed by it that they felt the need to publicly condemn it; see this report from the Nation, 11/20/06:
Dems Rebut Carter on Israeli 'Apartheid' by Michael F. Brown, on Ehud Olmert's decision to allow far-right members into the governing coalition.

Here's a good quote from that piece:
"Incoming House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, among others, forcefully criticized the book. "It is wrong," she declared, "to suggest that the Jewish people would support a government in Israel or anywhere else that institutionalizes ethnically based oppression, and Democrats reject that allegation vigorously."

Avigdor Lieberman, however, embodies the pursuit of "ethnically based oppression." He has called for the execution of Arab Knesset members for meeting with Hamas leaders, and he regularly talks of removing from Israel many Arab Israelis in what can euphemistically be termed a land swap or "transfer," but in more plain-spoken English is a form of ethnic cleansing.

There is a dual system of law at work in the occupied West Bank and East Jerusalem--one for Jews and one for Palestinians. Additionally, Palestinians are confined to South Africa-like bantustans, while Palestinian refugees are refused permission to return to homes and land from which they were expelled by Israel. Meanwhile, Jews from around the world are welcomed under Israel's Law of Return."

Israel and Palestine will eventually have to engage in a reconciliation as did whites and blacks in South Africa. This will not lead to 'the destruction of the state of Israel', any more than the resolution of South African apartheid led to 'a slaughter of the whites'. Hopefully the voices of reason and cooperation will overpower those of hatred and violence. It's ordinary people who will have to lead the way, as the timid, pandering actions of US and Israeli politicians clearly demonstrate.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Timid or Venal? Posted by: Douglas
» One state versus two states Posted by: lotus23
» The Dems are.... Posted by: vangogh69
I've a Radical Idea: Majority Rule
Posted by: edith on Dec 2, 2006 6:05 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The outcome of this dispute will not be peaceful. The issue has been clear since the late 19th century when zionists settled in Ottoman Palestine: an indigineous population was forcibly displaced by people(E.Europeans) who settled on the natives' land in order to escape persecution in Europe and to improve their economic lot.

In any other analagous situation, most people would immediately recognize this as a classic 19-early 20th cent. model of colonialism a la Rhodesia, S.Africa, Algeria or Congo.

No zionist political group supports a true national election to determine a regime and natonal culture that reflects the wishes of the people of Palestine as a whole. The Declaration of Independence of the US states far better than I the expected results of usurptation of the rights of the people.

Israel will be a historical footnote, similar to its ancient permutations of temporary Jewish sovereignty over parts of a region that never was exclusively "Jewish".

It would be interesting to discuss another time just what "Jewish" means from an ethnic or national view after 2,000 years of assimilation and cultural dispersion and variation.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Jewish identity Posted by: lotus23
» RE: Jewish identity Posted by: symcokid
» RE: Jewish identity Posted by: lotus23
» Oh please oh please oh please Posted by: HeroesAll
Power to the People + All We are Saying is Give PEACE a Chance
Posted by: wawa on Dec 2, 2006 6:57 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Power to the People + All We are Saying is Give PEACE a Chance
by Eileen Fleming

On Nov. 22, 2006 I read an inane Press Release from Human Rights Watch regarding creative NONVIOLENT civil disobedience, and am grateful to post Norman Finkelstein insightful rebuttal in today's WAWA Blog.

On the morning of November 24, 2006 I received an email from Gila in Jerusalem and posted her request on OpedNews.com

http://www.opednews.com/maxwrite/diarypage.php?did=2331

And on the WAWA DO SOMETHING page:
http://www.wearewideawake.org


I was the 68th person to sign the petition at

http://www.PetitionOnline.com/SaveGaza/petition.html

To the Israeli government and world leaders regarding:

GAZA: Stop the Siege! Stop the War!

As of this writing on the 8th morning after, I am thrilled that 5,885 people in the world have also signed this petition.

Today throughout the world people of good will in over 98 cities of the world are turning out and rising up/INTIFADA to raise awareness that

STARVATION is NOT The Path to PEACE!



POWER to the PEOPLE and a heartfelt THANK YOU to Finkelstein and everyone from Woodstock, New York to Melbourne, Australia, from Liverpool to Honolulu, from Cape Town, South Africa to Copenhagen, Denmark and all points in between who are only saying:


GIVE PEACE a CHANCE!!!

Read More and take the One Click Action to send a message to Congess and your local MSM:

http://www.opednews.com/maxwrite/diarypage.php?did=2381

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Greed Is King
Posted by: eyeman on Dec 2, 2006 11:35 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Late Nasser of Egypt said: Israel will not volunteer an inch without being forced to. Proven True in Lebanon, True in Gaza, True in Sinai.
But as long as they have bigger guns , they win. As long as they have nukes they will dominate. It is nice to talk about peace, Bi-National and exclusive and democratic solutions. But on the ground, nothing will change.
The Holocaust continues as we speak. In small doses, uncaptured by CNN. different victime this time: in Jenin, Bait Hanoon, Qana.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Israeli violations of international law continued during the reported period 23 – 29 Nov
Posted by: rwa on Dec 2, 2006 3:43 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
December 1, 2006

Israeli Occupation Forces (IOF) Continue Systematic Attacks on Palestinian Civilians and Property in the Occupied Palestinian Territory (OPT)

15 Palestinians, 7 of them are civilians (including a child and a woman), were killed by IOF.

13 of the victims were killed by IOF in the northern Gaza Strip.

3 of the victims were extra-judicially executed by IOF in Jabalya town.

49 Palestinians, including 19 children, a woman and an old man, were wounded by IOF.

IOF bombarded a money exchange shop in Gaza City.

IOF conducted 28 incursions into Palestinian communities in the West Bank.

IOF arrested 65 Palestinian civilians, including 8 children, in the West Bank.

IOF destroyed 27 houses in and razed 80 donums of agricultural land in the northern Gaza Strip.

IOF have continued to impose a total siege on the OPT; IOF arrested 6 Palestinian civilians, including two children, at checkpoints in the West Bank

IOF have continued to construct the Annexation Wall in the West Bank; they used force against peaceful demonstrations organized in protest to the construction of the Wall.

Israeli settlers have continued to attack Palestinian civilians and property in the OPT; IOF destroyed 5 houses and 7 civilian establishment in Jenin and Hebron, and Israeli settlers attacked a child and injured her.

http://www.pchrgaza.org

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Peace benefit to all? Don't think so.
Posted by: albrechtkrausse on Dec 3, 2006 9:40 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
1) It will not help the crazed mullahs who thrive on bloodshed of 'innocent' Palesitians and others to further their 'religious' careers and influence.

2) It will not help jewish hard-core zionists interests who need to drum up the 'islamic-threat' in order to gain elections and influence.

3) It will not help relatively secular, and often outright corrupt, Arab princes, kings, shieks, etc, who need to 'Palestinian' cause to elements in their own countries to focus on the external threat of 'evil jews' and fight for the 'palestinan homeland' so that they ignore the corruption, graft, sexual licentiousness of their leaders.

4) It will harm arms merchants and the economies of Belgium, France, South Africa, Britian, and the US who sells the guns and armaments to the various warring 'factions' in the Middle East.

5) It will harm the UN and various other 'peace' agencies and private NGOs who thrive on conflict to raise money and their own influence, and make ego-fullfilling headlines with their 'ideas', 'plans', and 'roadmaps' for peace and all the 'good work' they do helping out refugees.

6) It will harm the Republican Party especially, and also the Democrats, by not allowing us to use the Isreali 'example' to continue the GWOT and eliminate an 'enemy' necessary for the crack-down on civil rights, corporate welfare, and ultra-nationalism.

7) It will hard the Democratic and Republican Parties who receive much money for jewish political action committees, rich jewish banking interests, trial lawyers, etc.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Isreal and god...
Posted by: vangogh69 on Dec 3, 2006 1:41 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'm not a Christian, nor a jew, nor religous, yet I know many jews are and believe in God. I wonder, what sort of "justice" do they expect to receive from God after so much blood has been shead, on their behalf?

Isreal from its founding to today has been thoroughly racialist with the goal then, as now, being the complete annihilation of the Palestinian people. Because jews/zionists are found of trotting out The Holocaust (funny how it was the only one...good thing people have been so peace-loving aside from that, eh hem) they could not/cannot be seen as trying to wipe out the Palestinians, hence this slow death approach. First it was moving them off their land, then it's building the wall, then it's stealing their resources, cutting off their infrastructure, killing their economy, denying them the right to migrate around "Isreal" freely, then putting them ghettos (ala Warsaw, thank you Zionists for paying it forward), and lastly the shelling of their settlements which seems to happen weekly. There will be no peace process because it is not in Isreal's interests for there to be one: what is in its interest is the annihilation of a people from god's chosen land. For a preview of how this will turn out...

We need not even leave the continent, but visit one of the many ghettos (called popularly "Indian Reservations") to see how a people live once they have been 90% wiped out, marginalized, and moved to inhospitible lands. In some perverse ways, it's fitting that the US is Israel's biggest donor: after all, they have so much in common when it comes to apartheid and genocide.

Sorry if I sound harsh in this post but frankly, I lost whatever pity I had for the state of Isreal this past July when it was busy bombing Lebanon to the ground.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Isreal and god... TRUTH. Posted by: symcokid
ISRAELI EXPANSIONISM
Posted by: johndoraemi on Dec 3, 2006 3:42 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The article treats the two parties equally, as if one wasn't the occupier, the other the prisoner.

Israel has no intention of ever abandoning its "Eretz Israel" expansion. It is the militarily superior party, therefore it is quite comfortable in ethnically cleansing the land over the long term.

Their actions in Lebanon this summer prove it. The policy was to depopulate the entire South of Lebanon "up to the Litani River." That is the grand plan. That has always been the Israeli goal. The river itself is the goal there. That water will be diverted to serve Israeli interests as other water sources have also been diverted to serve Israeli interests. This explains the Israelis dropping 1 million anti-personnel cluster bombs in the last 72 hours before the "cease fire" onto Southern Lebanon, as well as aerially bombing all the dwellings in areas they wished to depopulate.

Israel, with unconditional American media and government support, is committing genocide against the Palestinians, as it has done for more than 60 years. The latest incidents and pretexts do not mask a grand strategy of taking over more and more territory. In war after war Israel is the aggressor, the occupier, the war criminal. The state of Israel is an abomination that can not be morally defended.

What they are doing is tantamount to the early US genocide against the native indians. This was also a despicable act, one that has inspired copycats: "settlers."

John Doraemi publishes the Crimes of the State Blog

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

BBC:Aggressor/Victim
Posted by: rwa on Dec 3, 2006 4:44 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
On November 24, 2006 the BBC News reported: “ Israel has dismissed an offer by Palestinian militant groups to stop firing rockets into Israel if Israel ends attacks on Palestinians. An Israeli government spokeswoman, Miri Eisen, said…the offer of an end to firing rockets from Gaza showed the lack of real commitment to peace (sic!).”

By that twisted logic, Israel’s continued artillery barrages of Palestinian towns demonstrated a ‘real’ commitment to peace! The BBC points to what most experts acknowledge is Israel’s long-term bellicose posture: “Israel has in the past consistently rejected ceasefire offers by Palestinian militants, saying it refuses to do deals of any kind with what it describes as terrorist organizations ”, (November 24, 2006).

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Thank God for Jimmy Carter
Posted by: beltane on Dec 4, 2006 10:52 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Carter's new book has brought a much-needed level of honesty to the US forum of ideas. For far too long it has been assumed in the US that the state of Israel has "a right to exist," a right no other country in human history has had. The perfectly-reasonable-sounding "right to exist" is actually a code phrase which means Israel has a right to hold on to the territory it seized by force in an illegal war, waged by what might reasonably be called "terrorists," territory far exceeding its UN mandate.

Why does the debate in the US focus so exclusively on the Israeli position? Simply because of money and domestic politics (AIPAC). Why does the debate in the US matter? Simply because without US aid, Israel wouldn't last a week. The whole world knows this, and this fact explains why "the terrorists hate us so."

On 9/11 this hate was manifested upon US soil. Ergo, we US citizens have every right to engage in this debate. I do sincerely hope that Israel supporters will refrain from labeling as "anti-Semites" those of us who choose to ask such legitimate questions about the US support of Israel. But, alas, that hope has already been dashed. Just this morning I see that Carter has already been branded as "anti-Semititic." Carter, who brokered the last successful Middle East peace deal. Carter, winner of the Nobel Peace Prize. Carter, perhaps the only US president with any credibility on the Palestinian issue. Hooray for the free discussion of ideas in the US. Thank God we're not a religiously intolerant totalitarian state.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Thank God for Jimmy Carter Posted by: mollyfee
Peace on Earth
Posted by: mom'z the word on Dec 4, 2006 12:44 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Trying to sort out all the issues and end up with a fair solution at this point in time would seem all but impossible. You can not undo death. You can not bring someone back to life. So getting even is impossible. If the object here is to end the violence rather than get even then there is a solution.

Tell me why this would not work to end the violence? A map outlining the entire external boundaries of both Palestine and Israel is presented. One leader, is does not matter which, draws the fairest and most equitable interior boundaries between the two countries. It does not matter which leader draws the boundaries because the other leader now gets to pick one of the two sides as his. The rules are simple. One map. Two leaders. One draws the boundaries. The other chooses which of the two pieces he wants. The international community serves merely as the referee to insure all the rules are agreed upon and followed.

This marks a new beginning. The past is over. Done. It is the future with no violence or killings to even up the score. Everybody wins. Peace on earth and good will towards all starts now. Oh please let it start now.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

So what's a nice Irish American 'Girl' ike me doing in Occupied territory?
Posted by: wawa on Dec 7, 2006 2:05 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I have been reporting from the Occupied Palestinian Territories on WAWA
and Opednews.com:

http://www.opednews.com/author/author1112.html

The following is excerpted from my 2nd book to be released Feb. 2007:

Chapter 2
Prophets, Persistence and
a Home Made for Peace


“Israel is a not a theocracy but is an Ethnocracy, meaning a country run and controlled by a national group with some democratic elements but set up with Jews in control and structured to keep them in control.”

“The Israeli government simply does not want to take responsibility and the USA government ignores the situation. Do you know why Israel does not want to become America’s 51st state? Because then they would only have two senators!"
-Jeff Halper, American Israeli, Founder and Coordinator of ICAHD/Israeli Committee Against House and 2006 Nobel Peace Prize Nominee

Much more on WAWA:
http://www.wearewideawake.org/

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

no kidding.
Posted by: p-ace on Dec 7, 2006 3:41 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"Frankly, this decision may piss off activists on both sides, but every person who watches the film will leave with an appreciation for the humanity of both Israelis and Palestinians, a sense that both people love their children, argue with their parents, are stubborn, and like food."

Though this is a true point, it could and probably was, worked out decades ago. I do not think activists (on either side) are entirely ignorant people unaware that their counterparts are humans also. Many people know this fact but have more complex and ingrained reasons for their opinion that would be hard to understand without living through their experiences.

This is not to say efforts like this documentary aren't valid or useful, as mentioned it is a welcome change in the rhetoric given to the Palestine Israel divide, if not slightly predictable. My concern is to not get side-tracked with over-idealist and simplistic attitudes. After all what we may see as a thought-provoking media piece, "an appreciation for humanity" as it were, others could see as a misrepresentation of their personal realities.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]