Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

Meth: The Overstated Addiction

By Margaret Dooley, Drug Policy Alliance. Posted November 30, 2006.


Methamphetamine abuse is not as prevalent as the government would have you believe.

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

In Special Coverage

Belief:
What if People Actually Treated Religion as Just a Metaphor (Like Trekkies and Secular Jews)?
Greta Christina

Corporate Accountability and WorkPlace:
15 Signs American Society Is Coming Apart at the Seams
David DeGraw

DrugReporter:
When It’s Crunch Time at College, Students Turn to Adderall
Erik Hayden

Environment:
20 Weird, Crazy Ideas for Helping the Earth

Food:
The War on Soy: Why the 'Miracle Food' May Be a Health Risk and Environmental Nightmare
Tara Lohan

Health and Wellness:
Pharmaceutical Giant Paid $500,000 to Psychiatrist Who Used Chicago's Poor as Guinea Pigs
Christina Jewett and Sam Roe

Immigration:
Dobbs' Resignation Was Long Overdue
Janet Murguía

Media and Technology:
Is Right-Wing Media Hustler Trying to "Blackmail" Obama's Attorney General over ACORN Videos?
David Edwards, Muriel Kane

Movie Mix:
The Yes Men: Pranksters Out to Fix the World
Mark Engler

Politics:
New Right-Wing Craze: Using Bible Quote to Pray That Obama’s 'Days Be Few'
Amanda Terkel

Reproductive Justice and Gender:
Hey Guys, Don't Want Kids? A Vascetomy Is Probably the Way to Go
Anna Clark

Rights and Liberties:
Economic Crisis Is Getting Bloody -- Violent Deaths Are Now Following Evictions, Foreclosures and Job Losses
Nick Turse

Sex and Relationships:
How Abstinence-Only Programs Perpetuate Dangerous Stereotypes
Martha Kempner

Take Action:
G-20 Meetings: Nothing Much Happened in the Suites, and There Was Too Much Punch in the Streets
Laura Flanders

Water:
Poseidon's Financial Shell Game: Why Is a Private Desalination Plant Asking for Public Money?
Peter Gleick

World:
Army Sends Mom to Afghanistan, Infant to Protective Services
Dahr Jamail

More stories by Margaret Dooley

Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

The Department of Justice has declared today National Methamphetamine Awareness Day. What better way to observe it than taking a break from the hype? Rather than repeating the popular fiction about methamphetamine (that use is skyrocketing, that only stepped up policing will counter the trend, and that addiction is untreatable), let's take a moment today to consider the evidence.

First, methamphetamine use is not prevalent. Although some 12 million Americans have tried methamphetamine, this is far fewer than the number who have tried inhalants (23 million), hallucinogens (34 million), cocaine (34 million), or marijuana (96 million). Of those who have tried methamphetamine, only 1.5 million have used the drug in the last year; and only 583,000 have used it within the last 30 days.

There is no indication that methamphetamine use is increasing. The proportion of Americans who use methamphetamine on a monthly basis has hovered in the range of 0.2 percent-0.3 percent since 1999. In fact, according to the 2005 Monitoring the Future survey, the percentage of high school seniors who reported using methamphetamine in the last year fell to a low of 2.5 percent in 2005. (Use of depressants, meanwhile, increased from a low of 2.8 percent in 1992 to around 7 percent in 2005.)

Second, policing is not "taking care" of methamphetamine. While limits on purchases of precursors have pushed many illicit labs out of our neighborhoods, the drug is still being manufactured -- just now it's across the border. Indeed, methamphetamine is now as available and cheap as it has ever been. This comes as no surprise. As long as demand for an illegal drug exists, there will be supply to meet it.

While policing has failed to curtail use of methamphetamine, it has successfully overloaded our jails and prisons. In the 1980s-90s, California followed national trends by relying increasingly on punishment and prisons as its primary response to arrests for illicit drug use. The total number of people imprisoned in California for drug possession quadrupled between 1988 and 2000, peaking at 20,116.

It was in response to this trend that California voters decided to change tactics. In 2000, 61 percent of California voters passed Proposition 36, the treatment-instead-of-incarceration law, which provides treatment to over 35,000 Californians convicted of nonviolent low-level drug offenses each year. Over half (53 percent) of Prop. 36 participants -- over 19,000 people -- enter treatment for methamphetamine abuse each year.

Prop. 36 has provided valuable evidence that methamphetamine addiction is quite treatable. According to state data on Prop. 36, methamphetamine users have a treatment completion rate of 35 percent, higher than users of cocaine/crack (32 percent) or heroin (29 percent). Although this was an important learning opportunity for policymakers, it was not news to treatment specialists. In fact, there have been at least twenty recent studies showing the efficacy of methamphetamine treatment.

The next step for policymakers is to provide treatment on demand, so that people suffering from addiction have access to treatment outside of the criminal justice system. It is both cheaper and better for public safety to provide treatment to those who need it sooner rather than later.

Other evidence shows that California's public health measures have not gone far enough. Although the Governor signed the Pharmacy Syringe Sale and Disease Prevention Act in 2004, well under half of California's 58 counties have implemented the program to allow nonprescription purchases of up to ten syringes at pharmacies. This is literally killing some of our state's most vulnerable residents.

According to the California Society of Addiction Medicine, 30-50 percent of those with newly identified HIV-infection use methamphetamine. Increasing the availability of sterile syringes through syringe exchange programs, pharmacies, and other outlets is proven to reduce unsafe injection practices, curtail transmission of HIV/AIDS and hepatitis, increase safe disposal of used syringes, and help intravenous drug users obtain drug education and treatment.

The truth about methamphetamine is that its use is not growing exponentially, that addiction is treatable, and that the risks it poses to public health can be mitigated.

Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: drugs, meth, methamphetamine

Margaret Dooley, who is based in San Diego, is the outreach coordinator for the Drug Policy Alliance.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
treatment
Posted by: rsaxto on Nov 30, 2006 1:05 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
When trying to reduce drug usage and damage treatment is almost always preferable to incarceration. Perhaps the reason for this is that doctors/nurses tend to be nicer people than prosecutors/cops/jailers.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» exactly Posted by: Donna_Darko
» RE: exactly Posted by: jack alexander
» RE: exactly Posted by: Lauren
» not always so Posted by: spacecadet
» Yes - 12 step fascists! Posted by: karma_ran_over_dogma
» RE: Yes - 12 step fascists! Posted by: zoomorph
» RE: Yes - 12 step fascists! Posted by: owleyes
» RE: Yes - 12 step fascists! Posted by: zoomorph
» RE: Yes - 12 step fascists! Posted by: zoomorph
» RE: Yes - 12 step fascists! Posted by: purplelotus13
» RE: Yes - 12 step fascists! Posted by: rsaxto
meth IS prevalent
Posted by: Paul D on Nov 30, 2006 5:32 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I work in state-government/law-enforcement in Kentucky and we have a HUGE meth problem, especially as you move further West in the state. This is a documented fact. Eastern Kentucky it's pills (your various oxy-somethings), and in Western Kentucky it's meth. Anyone who's not in denial will tell you that.

I agree that treatment as opposed to incarceration is the better course of action, and that the media tend to overhype minor problems. But around here, meth is very real and deserves every bit of attention it gets.

Also, for a good movie about meth, check out Spun. It's does for methamphetamine what Trainspotting or Requiem For a Dream did for heroine.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: meth IS prevalent Posted by: Phenix
» RE: meth IS prevalent Posted by: badkitty
» RE: meth IS prevalent Posted by: oregoncharles
» I'm interested... Posted by: Burton
» RE: I'm interested... Posted by: Mr. Heathen
Meth IS a problem in Indiana as well
Posted by: SufiLizard on Nov 30, 2006 5:47 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Perhaps the trends aren't uniform nation-wide, but Meth is certainly a HUGE problem here in Indiana as well. And like the previous poster, I agree that policing is not the effective first line of defense. But I also know that Meth is one of the hardest addictions to treat.

My wife worked for years as a nurse on a med psych unit where she saw numerous cases of meth addiction. In her opinion the meth addicts were less likely to kick than even heroin addicts.

And meth is literally ripping apart small towns and rural communities. The number of children going into foster care as a result of meth is astounding (this is something else of which I have very personal knowledge).

And I'm not just a mindless "Just Say No" person. I realize the ridiculousness of the anti-pot propaganda and some of the other narcotic witch hunts of our era -- but I happen to believe Meth is in a little different league.

That being said, crowding our jails with addicts isn't doing anything to solve the problem and is probably making things worse. We certainly need a new approach, but that approach shouldn't include minimizing a very serious problem.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» problem Posted by: Donna_Darko
Meth and derivatives are given to kids every day by Big Pharma for 'ADHD'
Posted by: thoughtcriminal on Nov 30, 2006 6:25 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Let's see - if I get a kid hooked on methamphetamines, amphetamines or their derivatives, do you think that kid might become a drug addict later in life? Of course! How about alcohol - there's no question there is there? If a kid starts drinking at age 6, do you think he stands a higher chance of becoming an alcoholic? Duh!

Methamphetamine is sold under the trade name 'Desoxyn'; other similar drugs include Ritalin and Wellbutrin - they all activate the same biochemical pathways in the brain. Kids won't sit still or pay attention, so the pharmaceutical industry, their drug-based psychotherapists and gullible parents give their kids meth to keep them occupied. See http://www.adhdfraud.org/ for more.

If you're going to write about substance abuse in America and ignore the complicity of the pharmaceutical industry then you're ignoring one of the central contributing cause. Then there's the heroin-based drugs like oxycontin, the favorite of Rush Limbaugh - he takes his oxycontin and then rages on the radio about cannabis-smoking liberals. Ridiculous!

And Viagra? Viagra is just pharmaceutical cocaine. The two drugs have similar effects on the sexual libido - it's just a matter of who you're giving your money to.

One other point is this - by classifying cannabis and meth as similar drugs, people are misled. They try cannabis, they realize that it's more innocuous then alcohol, and then they think that meth and heroin aren't any worse - which isn't true; they're highly addictive and dangerous drugs (kind of like cigarettes).

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I think your wrong about this one
Posted by: Tink on Nov 30, 2006 7:16 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I do not believe the findings are fabricated... I work in an alcohol and substance abuse recovery program. I also live in a small town. In a town of about 6000 people I know first hand of about 75 people that are addicted to Meth and many that have tried it. Today the drug Meth is made with heroin so it is more addictive than ever. There is less than 6% chance of recovery from the addiction. I do not believe the problem is fabricated and this problem is growing worse everyday. Maybe you need to investigate the problem a little more.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: I think your wrong about this one Posted by: insulaparadigm
» Numbers Posted by: BlueTigress
Reason For The War On Drugs
Posted by: philobat on Nov 30, 2006 7:17 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If the government and watchdog groups truly wanted to end drug abuse the solution is simple. End the corruption by creating a justice system that is actually just. Spread the wealth and stop being so greedy. Quit bullying and stealing from other nations. Tell us all the REAL truth and be honest and caring. Take care of people who cannot take care of themselves. Abolish religion by taxing the churches. Disband the CIA.

If these steps were taken then people would not need to escape into a needle, bottle or a pipe.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Meth in Texas
Posted by: Tankerdeath on Nov 30, 2006 7:20 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Go to any small town along the I-35 corridor and ask the local cops how many meth labs have been busted or are under surveillance. Ask any school counselor how many of her kids are involved with meth.

My girlfriend and I don't even smoke pot, but we both have several freinds who have ruined thier lives with meth.

It's not as bad as you think, my ass.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Meth in Texas Posted by: Burton
» Needles and Haystacks Posted by: eddie torres
» RE: Meth in Texas Posted by: jwg
LEGALISE ALL DRUGS NOW!
Posted by: AdamG on Nov 30, 2006 7:35 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Really, I'm not joking. It would be the best policy. Right now, our society isn't saying drugs are bad, it's saying illegal drugs are bad. As long as you go through the state sanctioned process of getting drugs, you're OK. If you step outside of the state sanctioned process and procur nonapproved drugs, you're bad. The government is only protecting the monopoly on medication held by the health care industry and the pharmaceutical industry.

Even something like meth if it were made legal to manufacture, sell and use imagine the impact. If we take away the stigma of illegalness, it moves more into the public spotlight. Even the chemical byproducts made in it making could be dealt with by HazMat people instead of finding their way into the soil and water because of the dumping of them off the beaten path. In my area of Northern Cali, they commonly find them used chemmies in creeks, river, and deep in the woods. In some cases, you can see lab sites from the air because of all the dead trees poisoned by the chemicals.

Somethings like cocaine and heroin, if not illegal, would be cheaper then coffee. It would loosen the CIA's stranglehold on countries in Latin America and Central Asia. If you don't think protect the international drug trade is one of the CIA's biggest rackets, you're a fool.

Marijauna, it's just ridiculous that it's illegal. Besides it obviously being fairly benign, if it were legalised there would be no reason not to also legalise industrial hemp.

All the monies used for fighting the War on Drugs then could go elsewhere. Job training, social programs designed to really get people out of poverty and not push them farther into it or keeping them dependent, and treatment programs would be more then funded by all the money wasted fighting the Drug War. Just improving peoples socioeconomic lot would work wonders as people who have successful and meaningful lives tend not to abuse drugs. Not that they don't use them, they just aren't as likely abuse them causing negative impacts on society as a whole as their uses' impact moves beyond someone's personal life.

Legalising all drugs really would be the best policy.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: LEGALISE ALL DRUGS NOW! Posted by: autumnrealm1
» RE: LEGALISE ALL DRUGS NOW! Posted by: aussidawg
» Whatever works for you...your choice. Posted by: ABetterFuture
» decriminalization Posted by: Donna_Darko
» momma mia, mea culpa! Posted by: bornxeyed
» Drain the CIA of $$$ Posted by: pomes
We're # one
Posted by: bookie on Nov 30, 2006 8:16 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Last time I checked Missouri was # one in Meth production. I guess we had to be first in something. Anyway its a big problem here, not just with the addicts, but with the toxic byproducts of meth that is polluting the land and water. What fairy land is the author living in?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: We're # one Posted by: Burton
» good question Posted by: bookie
» RE: We're # one Posted by: Phenix
» RE: We're # one Posted by: pomes
seen the damage
Posted by: ridebalanced on Nov 30, 2006 8:23 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Why do so many of us parents caught in the middle want to kick the asses of you who write these articles? What do your parents think of you? Take yourself out of your hyperboled statistics. Place yourself with a teen in your arms, as a havin' been a pot smoking kid in their own day, and replace it with brain damage in my kid. Meth don't fly.....it fries!!!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: seen the damage Posted by: autumnrealm1
» RE: seen the damage Posted by: Lauren
Reply
Posted by: autumnrealm1 on Nov 30, 2006 8:27 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If drugs were legalized the companies producing them would have to meet gov. enviromental standards. There has to be another, more efficient, more humane way of dealing with this problem; obviously the present method is not working (except for the judges, lawyers, and other 'justice related " professionals)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Missed the boat on this one Alternet . . .
Posted by: JCR on Nov 30, 2006 8:30 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
So far we have folks from Kentucky, Indiana and Texas saying that Meth IS a big problem. I will see you those three states and raise you another - Colorado. Meth labs are springing up all over the state and busts are so commonplace that it's an everyday occurence to see the streets taped off and HAZMAT units scurrying about gingerly for fear of blowing themselves up.

I have personally never touched this shit but I know plenty of people who have. If people as far east as Kentucky and Indiana are attesting to its prevalence, imagine what it's like in Idaho, Nevada, California, Utah, Arizona, New Mexico and Wyoming? The stuff has been spreading west to east for quite some time so I think it suffices to say that the problem is much bigger than you have stated Alternet.

The solution is never incarceration however. I was very, very disappointed that Colorado didn't become the first state to legalize marijuana outright. This country is never going to learn!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Good point Posted by: JCR
» Law enforcement Posted by: Donna_Darko
» Jesus would smoke pot! Posted by: JCR
» RE: Jesus would smoke pot! Posted by: Burton
Meth Day: A day Government Positions Itself to Take Away Your Rights!
Posted by: anthonypapa on Nov 30, 2006 8:44 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I agree with Dooley. The hype is on! Ok, maybe a few states have a significant problem. But, if current trends continue, local law enforcement will soon be controlling your life "via" the Meth epidemic.

Six states, including Washington, are considering joining Tennessee, Illinois, Montana and Minnesota in enacting a state methamphetamine offender registry. These registries will publicly display address and other information about convicted meth users, makers and dealers. In validating their call for registries, law enforcement officials have complained that the waste materials associated with clandestine meth labs are toxic and pose serious health threats to communities and emergency responders.

The manufacture, trafficking and abuse of meth have jumped to the forefront of national concern as the latest U.S. "drug epidemic." Cover stories depict meth as "America's Most Dangerous Drug." Alarmist media coverage of the dangers of meth and the draconian political responses that followed are reminiscent of the public reaction to crack cocaine in the 1980s. A new federal government Meth/Drug Hot Spots program was soon implemented. It offered local and state agencies almost $400 million to find and eradicate meth labs. Through financial incentives, policing policies were increased to take advantage of this new federal cash cow, all in the name of stopping the meth epidemic.

Now desperate measures are being enacted to tackle this "high priority" problem -- measures that sometimes invade the privacy and civil liberties of citizens in ways that seem far removed from the war on drugs. The idea of using criminal offender databases is not new. Sex offenders have been under a watchful public eye through online registries in all 50 states for some time now. Few would argue against their use in this manner. After all, we must protect our children from predators. But do we really need the same type of tool for the prohibition of meth?

Recent studies by several policy organizations such as the Sentencing Project have questioned the very existence this so-called epidemic, busting many of the myths perpetuated by the media. The studies concluded that meth is actually one of the rarest of illegal drugs used, with its use declining among youth, stabilizing among adults and demonstrating no increase in first-time users. Furthermore, even governmental data dispute the existence of an epidemic.

The war on drugs has created convenient vehicles of looking tough on crime while hiding behind the shield of public safety. But that shield gets worn down when our basic rights are curtailed through its use. On Sept. 30, a new federal law went into effect that forces cold sufferers to jump through ridiculous hoops to purchase what were originally over-the-counter medications.

Customers with colds now must present a photo ID and sign a log in order to purchase cold and allergy medicines containing pseudoephedrine, ephedrine and phenylephrine -- precursor drugs that can be used to manufacture meth. There are an estimated 34 different chemicals found in common household products such as lighter fluid, road flares and matches that can also be used to make meth. Are we going to create similar laws to restrict purchases of all those items as well?

We need to invest scarce public resources into educating the public about the use of meth and providing high quality treatment options to fight addiction, not create a intrusive public registry or layer on ineffective bureaucratic busy work. Just another law enforcement tool that leads to the further erosion of our precious civil liberties. It might not be apparent now, but neither was our right to not be hassled when buying cold medicine before the law changed.

Tony P

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

SE Texas Report
Posted by: OpinionsGetOld on Nov 30, 2006 8:54 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Meth is certainly a very big problem in my neck of the woods, the Beaumont area of SE Texas. I've had friends who've messed themselves up very badly, I've seen it tear my friend's parents apart, run into more 'tweakers' in convenience stores and on the streets than I can count, and heard more than once of garbage bags...hefty F'n garbage bags full of the stuff being moved all over the place.

I'm not sure I agree with legalizing Meth though..Marijuana, LSD, psychadelic mushrooms, cocaine, opium, heroin, MDMA, those are all fine by me...Asides, the main case meth has is a longer buzz than cocaine, so with legal cocaine and lower prices, folks could afford the occassional binge abit better.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: SE Texas Report Posted by: Lauren
» RE: SE Texas Report Posted by: harris
» RE: SE Texas Report Posted by: aussidawg
How many ruined lives aren't significant?
Posted by: Mamarianne on Nov 30, 2006 9:42 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Meth became popular as a cheap high used by poor folks. It ruins lives in way that is far more rapid and insidious than heroin.
I have maintained since I began teaching in the sixties that the big marijuana lie is a major reason why kids won't listen when we try to warn them that some drugs are truly dangerous. I mean, if we are misrepresenting pot as something terribly dangerous, then many young folks see no reason to believe other messages about drugs, messages that are, in fact, accurate.
I would like to see this nation legalize and tax marijuana and use the funding to treat addictions.
Clearly, the war on drugs--like the war in Iraq--is a quagmire that (and this is no surprise) victimizes the poor and the young.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Maybe this is about racial "fairness"?
Posted by: karma_ran_over_dogma on Nov 30, 2006 9:45 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
A recent story about the racial disparities in cocaine/crack sentencing makes me wonder if there's a police state effort with the supposed meth epidemic to say, in effect, "See? We hate poor white people too! So GIVE US FUNDING, DAMMIT!"

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Meth use documentary in Arizona
Posted by: btr on Nov 30, 2006 10:10 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'm not sure why you feel the need to downplay any illegal drug. I am working on a documentary about meth use in the Verde Valley in Arizona. I'm not sure where you're getting your information, but I am getting a different story from the people who addicted, dealers, counselors, and state officials. We have front page news every week about it. In the one year we have been filming we have seen a family killed by a driver on meth, children who's parent overdosed on meth, and teachers arrested for taking it. It is a serious problem, just as all drugs are. No illegal drug deserves more respect than another. Any time you can educate the public and try to find out why people feel the need to take drugs, you are that much closer to finding a way to end it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Also in California
Posted by: jamester on Nov 30, 2006 11:04 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This is the second article in recent memory in Alternet (Jan Frel wrote the other) minimizing the meth problem. Here in southern california I see it almost daily in my work (I'm a therapist). It is unclear where the author got her statistics, or if she has ever asked any real people involved in these areas for their insights.
This seems like just another case of "lies, damned lies, and statistics"...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Tweakers suck! Posted by: catbut
» RE: Tweakers suck! Posted by: ignition
» RE: Tweakers suck! Posted by: catbut
» RE: Tweakers suck! Posted by: Burton
good discussion
Posted by: axjxhx on Nov 30, 2006 11:22 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
regardless of how "good" this article really is or isn't...it is inspiring some great discussion about a REAL PROBLEM. i was addicted to meth for a little under 2 years, and my husband, the same. the drug has had a hold on my husband more than it has for me, and we talk openly about the cravings when they come because of how addictive meth IS.....which is probably the best thing that we can do for each other in trying to help each other stay clean. ALSO, medical marijuana has helped both of us with meth cravings & the sleeplessness that ensues...MMJ has been VERY helpful. the research that is coming out of medical marijuana is starting to point towards relief from other addictive drugs (not saying that MMJ is not addictive, it IS, but less HARMFUL to the body than OTC prescriptions to alleviate addiction cravings, like wellbutrin & other anti-depressants). i think that meth has been in the closet as far as being recognized as being a REAL problem....and this article further encourages that mentality.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: good discussion Posted by: Burton
What is the Real Issue?
Posted by: VisionQuest on Nov 30, 2006 12:03 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I don't think the point of the article is that meth addiction, production and distrbution are not real problems, but to point out that every few years a new drug "epidemic" comes down the pike that is supposed to rain the apocalypse down on our heads--and the only response we can muster to each one is criminalization.

Rarely if ever do we wonder WHY so many Americans abuse drugs. We imbue the particular substance with magical powers to "ensare" people as if it doesn't have to be sought and actively pursued in order for people to become addicted to it.

The problem in America isn't meth, just as it wasn't crack, cocaine, heroin, morphine, opium or any of the other drugs that have inspired wide-spread panic and hysteria. The problem is that so many Americans want to escape from consciousness, and will thus find whatever means to that end that are available. People drink to excess or abuse prescription drugs; kids ingest massive amounts of cold medicine and huff the fumes from literally hundreds of household products. Is the problem the substances, or the impulse, and the inability to control it?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: What is the Real Issue? Posted by: jmooney
Drug Prohibition is Here To Stay.
Posted by: aussidawg on Nov 30, 2006 12:31 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Drugs aren't illegal because our politicos are concerned for our health, drugs are illegal because they are more profitable that way. Look at the increase in opium production in Afganistan since we ran out the Taliban. This drug money is used by foreign governments to purchase arms. Who do they purchase the arms from? Folks such as Martin-Lockheed, Grumman, Boeing, Raytheon, etc. In other words, our beloved military-industrial complex. A very informative article on this can be found here.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

WAR ON DRUGS SUPPLIES PRISON LABOR
Posted by: ignition on Nov 30, 2006 12:59 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The real story is the war on drugs insuring a steady labor supply for private firms benefit in our slave labor camps. You may have heard those camps called by another name. Prisons!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

lynned2002
Posted by: lynned2002 on Nov 30, 2006 1:04 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I am against the useless war on drugs. I could care less whether or not people smoke pot or drink alcohol. I seriously doubt heroin or cocaine has done any good for anyone and has damaged many lives. But methamphetamine is without a doubt the most damaging drug ever. It literally makes people psychotic. Many people who commit horrific crimes of child abuse and sexual attack are meth users, such as the man who killed Polly Klaas. This is the worst drug to ever hit the face of the earth. While I think those who are users should get treatment for possession and under the influence, anyone caught making or selling this stuff should be shot at high noon in the town square.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: lynned2002 Posted by: Burton
» RE: lynned2002 Posted by: lynned2002
Now I'm pissed
Posted by: Iconoclast421 on Nov 30, 2006 1:42 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Meth isn't like pot or cocaine or shrooms or even acid. It's highly destructive to the brain. One use is all it takes to permanently alter a person's psychological profile 5 years down the road. Meth is big pharma'a wet dream... you can bet that half of the people gleefully eating up those E pills today will be feeding millions to big pharma 5 years from now because their brains will be so screwed up from it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

will more laws help curb meth use
Posted by: insulaparadigm on Nov 30, 2006 2:42 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Meth has f-k the majority of people I know/n who have used it in massive life changing bad ways. A lot of people do get by normally even holding down jobs but it's still at a massive personal cost. Meth is in no way ok.

But the drug war as with everything else has just increased the economic incentive.

Media scare / hype and the legislative backlash response will not help. We have the highest prison pop per capita in the world and the drug problem get worse and worse.
We need more treatment - if meth users respond better than other typical drugs of abuse - that's great !
We should focus even more on that.

It's good that law enforcement focus on meth as opposed to other drugs but overall how much has it changed anything?
Not every meth user is an animal or eats their children, the person they are hurting is first and foremost is themselves. How is the law going to help?

And unless I'm wrong the south isn't a hotbed of progresive drug policy and has the worst problems- massively speculative at best and prolly not causative or perhaps even correlated but I'm still skeptical about more law... more punitive laws.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Take a walk in downtown Reno, NV
Posted by: owleyes on Nov 30, 2006 4:26 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
if you don't think meth addiction is real and prevalent.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Addiction prevalence is not the only issue...
Posted by: Novellaidea on Nov 30, 2006 4:44 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Regardless of the number, there is another reason the government is so focused on meth. Ever seen a home (mobile or otherwise) that is now an exploded meth lab? In many areas, especially poorer ones, a recently exploded lab is not an uncommon sight. Meth production is dangerous, nevermind what people do with the meth afterward.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

This is a shallow argument
Posted by: flashfast on Nov 30, 2006 7:11 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'm sorry - but when I was in america I saw a terrible rise in meth use. Now in Australia, I am shocked to find how widespread it is here too - my nephew takes it as do all the young people in this small and remote coastal community.

Methaphetamines are the worst drug in the world - people become violent not from its usage, but it's disusage. A typical scenario is a user gives it up ofr say 3 months. Then they might have a socail 'snort' and, when coming down from the high, they can become so irrational as to injure or even murder another.

It is a plague, and as a casual observer I can honestly say it's use is widespread and growing. The majority use does not appear in any statistics, and academic argument is shallow.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Faulty Statistics
Posted by: billfaster on Nov 30, 2006 9:03 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Margaret Dooley, the articles author and an employee of the Drug Policy Alliance which is a radical nonprofit with a publicly stated agenda of eradicating the current War on Drugs has a direct interest in skewing and/or misrepresenting available statistics in her favor. For example, the only reference that she cited was from the 2005 Monitoring the Future survey. Let me quote a passage from their most recent survey:

For most of the life of the study the only question
about methamphetamine use has been contained in
a single 12th-grade questionnaire form. Respondents
who indicated using any type of amphetamines
in the prior 12 months were asked in a
sequel question to check on a prespecified list the
types they had used during that period.

It would appear, then,
that the long-term method we had been using for
tracking methamphetamine use probably yielded
an understatement of the absolute prevalence level,
perhaps because some proportion of methamphetamine
users did not correctly categorize themselves
initially as amphetamine users (even though methamphetamine
was given as one of the examples of
the amphetamines).

This was taken from: http://www.monitoringthefuture.org/
pubs/monographs/overview2005.pdf

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Faulty Statistics Posted by: insulaparadigm
» RE: Faulty Statistics Posted by: billfaster
» RE: Faulty Statistics Posted by: insulaparadigm
Michigan
Posted by: BlueTigress on Nov 30, 2006 10:17 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Best as I can tell, Michigan does not have a problem with meth.

But this doesn't change the fact that if I want to buy ONE stupid package of Sudafed at my local mass market retailer, I have to go pester a pharmacy tech and sign a register with my name and address, plus show ID if I want to take it so I can pay at one checkout. I always assure the pharmacy tech politely that I know they can't help it, it's the law.

It's a stupid law put in place in the last year in response to something that may have been a problem five years ago. Unless things have changed again, last I knew meth cookers were getting the precursors from people who imported them in mass quantities from Mexico.

But like a poster above said, this is the government trying to take our freedoms.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Place to look for statistics: arrested violent offenders on alcohol and/or meth
Posted by: thoughtcriminal on Nov 30, 2006 10:26 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I think a more realistic study would look at the proportion of violent crimes that are conducted under the influence of meth or alcohol - you'd probably find that alcohol was the #1 contributor, followed by meth at #2. Cannabis doesn't even appear, since it vastly reduces violent impulsive behavior (which is why it's a great treatment for recovering alcoholics and meth addicts).

I tried finding these statistics and had little luck; it seems that as much as 1/2 of all violent crime is alcohol related, and in San Jose CA a report stated that 30% of detainees had meth in their system, but that was for all crimes, not just violent ones. Perhaps the criminal system doesn't want these statistics gathered - it would show that cannabis is a far safer drug (both socially and medically) then either alcohol or meth.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Meth IS a big problem - Oregon
Posted by: dyspeptic on Dec 1, 2006 12:38 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I just don't believe the numbers in the top article. The writer needs to come visit here and see for themselves. I don't know what their methodology was, but I don't buy it.

What I see here is a BIG problem. I see a really tough to beat link between poverty and hunger and meth. Other drugs provide escape, maybe. But meth gives a feeling of energy and relieves hunger. So, there is then this cycle of hunger, meth, activity, hunger, meth... Then, too, doing a drug gives people the illusion of control of their circumstances.

I don't understand the motive to minimize this epidemic. What does anybody have to gain by denying it? It is real here, and it is incredibly destructive.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

It is the lack of sleep
Posted by: drblack on Dec 1, 2006 1:29 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Meth becomes a problem because people do it for days and get no sleep. Lack of sleep ALWAYS results eventually in insane behavior. The same is true of all stimulants when used in place of sleep. Meth was considered a big problem in my area in the early 80's and has with most drugs a small amout (averages2%) became compulsive about it. Sooner or later they stopped or died. Forbidden fruit is always more seductive and repealing drug prohabition is a must if we really want to start to deal with abuse.
People who work in law enforcement or drug treatment only see the worst cases and have more hysterical opinions about drugs then most.
Every few years some other drug is "The worst problem ever ,and it is killing everybody>>>>WAAAAAA"
Drugs have been around forever and they always will be...let us get smart and end prohibition which makes a penny worth of some plant or chemical worth 10 bucks.
Also ,to study how to help drug abuse costs hundreds of thousands for a DEA license...this stops so much valuble research. Drugs are not and never have done anything...people do things and when we realize that treating people with compassion and recognizing that no one wants to hurt themselves we will be on track. Let us find out why some peoples makeup makes them go crazy for some drugs.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Outsourcing meth production...
Posted by: ignition on Dec 1, 2006 10:05 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
By clamping down on local meth labs manufacturing will be outsourced to Mexico.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Go to any Urban Village and See How Meth is Killing the Gay Community
Posted by: MikeNSwiss on Dec 1, 2006 1:57 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I believe this author to be uninformed and myopic on her review on the current impact and growing epidemic of Meth use/abuse. If anyone is interested in getting their facts straight about the growing incidence and serious destruction that Meth use is causing check out the following URL from the First National Conference on Methamphetamine, HIV and Hepatitis, held last August 19–20, 2005 / Salt Lake City:

http://www.harmredux.org/conferencemedia.html.

Here, of particular interest is The History of Methamphetamine: An Epidemic In Context, by Patricia Case, Sc.D. Assistant Professor, Department of Social Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Cambridge.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

How much contact do you have?
Posted by: forbzilla on Dec 1, 2006 3:02 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Please! To compare the number of users of inhalants and dope to that of Meth, thus "proving" its use is overstated, and then compare the treatment efficacy as positive as related to heroine, is really misleading!
I agree that treatment is the avenue of choice in any drug addiction, but have personal experience with ten to twenty individuals, struggling, on the margin: street people who do part time work. I see the results of a cheap, highly addictive, long term function-smashing drug close hand. It's not like smoking a joint. It takes over a year for brain cells to heal from meth, and in the meantime, even if they can stay off meth, these people are not as they were. Addiction to this drug takes the larger values--diligence, trust, care of children--and throws them to the curb. The problem is huge precisely because meth is so cheap and so available to people who have so little. Marginalizing it and comparing it to the recreational drugs that people toy with relatively safely does not help. This is very bad stuff, and though regrettable, better in jail than using. Please check your calibration before writing such things!
Spokane, Washington.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I just wish
Posted by: LtL on Dec 1, 2006 4:50 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
all of these drug addicts would OD and die. It would be so nice to walk down the streets in Seattle and not see some scum of the earth tweaker on every 3rd block.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: I just wish Posted by: dnaylor
» moron Posted by: alterhead
Ridiculous.
Posted by: bookworm8571 on Dec 2, 2006 8:34 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The meth problem is HUGE, particularly in rural states. Ask any county sheriff in North Dakota if meth is a problem. Ask the foster care system, which is overburdened with the care of children of meth addicts. Ask people who have rented out homes in rural communities that have been turned into meth factories. I can personally name meth addicts who became addicted in their forties or fifties. One 40-something woman started using meth to lose weight and ended up losing her job, her children, her savings, and her health. Even after treatment these people aren't able to feel joy because it burns out the pleasure centers in their brains. I suspect the author thinks meth isn't a problem because it isn't hitting California in the same numbers it has hit rural America and, therefore, she thinks it isn't as important. Bull. Crawl out from under your rock.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» meth started in Calif. Posted by: alterhead
RealActivist
Posted by: RealActivist on Dec 3, 2006 8:54 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Reading thru the responses to Dooley's article, what becomes clear is that regardless of whether one thinks meth is a terrible and growing problem, or merely a serious problem that's been overly sensationalized in the media, we almost all agree that the war on drugs is not the right approach.

The question is: what are WE going to do about that?

I will give you one idea. Dooley works for the Drug Policy Alliance, which is doing more to try to end the drug war than anyone else. They were the key force behind virtually all of the ballot initiatives to legalize medical marijuana, and also -- as Dooley -- says, behind Prop 36, which is the biggest piece of sentencing reform in the US since the repeal of alcohol Prohibition. They've also been successful in legalizing needle exchanges to reduce HIV/AIDS, reforming mandatory minimum laws, and getting the California PTA involved in more honest drug education. The folks who work there and support them disagree about legalization (although mostly agree about marijuana legalization) -- but they all agree we need to end the current madness and put all options on the table.

One of the best things any of us can do is get involved in the movement to end the war on drugs. Go to DPA's website, www.drugpolicy.org, sign up for their enewsletter and action alerts, and send them some money -- so fewer people can spend next Christmas behind bars for nothing more than violating a drug law.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Thank you Posted by: insulaparadigm
Eastern Washington
Posted by: albrechtkrausse on Dec 3, 2006 9:48 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Has a BIG meth problem. Lots of meth labs, thin people with scabs all over them milling about by the bus station and train station in Spokane. Lots of increase of "petty" crime (theft, home buglary, car theft, check scams, theft of farm material used to make meth.) Also this can lead to worse because it the paranoia associated with meth can accelerate other nefarious elements in the regions (racist-types, ease of gun availability, fear of black helicopters, etc.)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

report from womens' prison
Posted by: jadelynn on Dec 4, 2006 7:00 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I was just in california state prison for a non-violent, non-drug related crime for a few months, and what I saw was that half the women were white, and the vast majority of them were in there because of crimes related to meth addiction. They older inmates said that this just started happening in the past 10 years or so. It was awful to see when they arrived, their hair pulled out, their faces picked until they were bloody and raw, teeth falling out by the time they are 30 years old.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Everyones A Suspected Drug Dealer
Posted by: hole11 on Dec 5, 2006 5:24 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Law and order people want more cops and money to fight this and the next epidemic.

Those that want to be left alone on their own accord don't want to be bothered by someone who knows better than them and has the power to push them around.

That's the war on drugs. Drugs that supposed to pollute the mind and body.

I noticed that many have said it's a problem in their state like Indiana and Kentucky. There was a time when the Ohio river had cleaner water. There was a time when coal burning power plants didn't dot the meandering river. No one stopped them and no one is complaining about cancer rates and all those dangerous factories spewing cancer causing chemicals in your lungs.

So why would anyone care about a persons choice to chose their own poison? I imagine a person does these things because the opportunity presents itself or the person is naturally curious.

Man has high expectations to improve himself and his condition. When that isn't possible he might try to escape. One way to escape is drugs. Or if it just feels good he does it.

Then the majority decides for us that they are just going to remove the undesirables. See no evil. But the necessary evil goes on filling our air and water with pollution.

Thanks for your concern but who do I send the bill to when my lifestyle changes to the worse because the majority want that pollution? That is going to be the next epidemic.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

When breathing is criminal, only criminals will have Sudafed.
Posted by: Darkrose on Dec 6, 2006 3:39 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Customers with colds now must present a photo ID and sign a log in order to purchase cold and allergy medicines containing pseudoephedrine, ephedrine and phenylephrine.

I came down with a sinus infection recently. In order to get some Sudafed, I had to:

1. Go to the pharmacy and stand in line.
2. Request the one pack I'm allowed to buy per month.
3. Swipe my driver's license.
4. Sign the log with my name and address, which must be kept by the pharmacy for two years.

I bought the stuff because I'm coughing up green goo and I can't breathe. The procedure made me feel like a criminal.

Yes, meth addiction kills. So does alcohol addiction, but I can go into the same drugstore and buy a bottle of vodka--I've got enough grey hair that I probably wouldn't get carded to see if I'm over 21.

Meth addiction is clearly a big problem, but the current attempt by the government to solve it is mainly punishing people who haven't done anything.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement