Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Memo to Congress: The Working Poor Need a Raise

By Peter Dreier, TomPaine.com. Posted November 30, 2006.


Fed up after watching the minimum wage stagnate at poverty level for nearly a decade, a growing number of states are introducing their own pay raises with cost-of-living adjustments. Congress should follow their lead.

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

More stories by Peter Dreier

Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

Americans are divided about many things, but on at least one issue they stand united: During the past decade, polls have consistently shown that Americans overwhelmingly want Congress to raise the minimum wage. According to a report earlier this year from the Pew Research Center, 83 percent of the American public -- including 72 percent of Republicans and 75 percent of those who earn over $75,000 a year -- favor boosting it to more than $7 an hour. But, since 1997, Congress has refused to act, leaving the minimum wage stuck at $5.15 an hour.

Frustrated by Congress' intransigence, a growing number of states have made an end run around Washington. Before Election Day, 22 states had enacted laws -- by passing ballot measures or by legislative action -- to raise their minimum wages above the federal level.

On November 7, voters in another six states -- Arizona, Colorado, Missouri, Montana, Nevada and Ohio -- approved measures to raise state minimum wage levels by $1 to $1.70 an hour. But in each of these six states, voters took another important step. They agreed to increase the minimum wage each year by indexing it to inflation. Four other states -- Oregon, Florida, Washington and Vermont -- had already approved minimum wage laws that are not only higher than the federal level, but also include annual cost-of-living adjustments (COLAs). Washington State's minimum wage, now $7.63, is the nation's highest.

Nancy Pelosi, who will become Speaker of the House in January, has pledged to hike the federal minimum wage to $7.25 an hour as one of the Democrats' first acts after taking control of the House and Senate. This would give at least 6.6 million low-wage workers a direct pay increase; millions more will have their wages hiked because the floor has been raised.

But with the Democrats now in a stronger position in Congress, many union leaders and community groups want them to push not only to raise the federal minimum wage, but also to include a path-breaking cost of living adjustment, so that inflation doesn't continue to erode its purchasing power.

Since 1997, when Congress last raised the minimum wage, its buying power has declined by 20 percent. The federal minimum wage is now the lowest it's been since 1955 (in inflation-adjusted dollars). The highest during that period was in 1968, when it was worth almost $8 an hour in today's dollars. Progressive Democrats in Congress should up the ante and demand a minimum wage hike to at least the poverty level -- $20,000 a year, or $9.60 an hour -- with a COLA clause, too.

"Periodically adjusting the minimum wage to keep up with inflation just makes common sense," said John J. Sweeney, President of the AFL-CIO, a major proponent of hiking the wage.

"Whenever we have given them the chance, a large majority of voters -- including large numbers of Republican voters -- voted for minimum wage increases with indexing," said Maude Hurd, president of ACORN, the national community organizing group that has played a key role in many of the state-level minimum wage battles. "The President and Congress should follow their lead."

In November 2004, ACORN and several labor groups led a successful battle in Florida to raise the minimum wage by one dollar to $6.15 an hour and to increase it annually based on the consumer price index. There, where Bush beat John Kerry by 381,000 votes, voters favored the minimum wage increase by 3.1 million votes -- or 71.3 percent to 28.7 percent -- despite the opposition of the state's business community and Governor Jeb Bush.

ACORN and its union allies then looked for other key states in this year's races where they could not only win ballot measures to hike the minimum wage with a COLA provision but also target voter mobilization efforts to increase turnout among likely Democrats -- a liberal counterpart to conservative efforts to put anti-gay marriage measures on the ballot.

They identified six states with potentially close Senate, House or gubernatorial races.

In Missouri, Proposition B -- which will increase the state's minimum wage from the current federal base to $6.50 and index it to inflation -- garnered 76 percent of the statewide vote and won a majority in every county. It was supported by all age groups and income levels. Four-fifths of voters earning less than $50,000 supported raising the minimum wage, as did almost three-quarters of those earning over $50,000. In Montana, 73 percent of voters approved an initiative to raise the state minimum wage to $6.15 and require annual cost-of-living increases. The grassroots campaigns to hike the minimum wage increased voter turnout, especially in the cities, and helped Democrats Claire McCaskill and John Tester win close victories in Missouri and Montana, respectively, helping their party to a majority in the U.S. Senate.


Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: congress, minimum wage, inflation

Peter Dreier, professor of politics at Occidental College, is coauthor of "The Next Los Angeles: The Struggle for a Livable City" and "Place Matters: Metropolitics for the 21st Century."

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
raise it forever
Posted by: rsaxto on Nov 30, 2006 12:49 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If Pelosi/Reid etc. really want to do the right thing they will sponsor a $7.50 minimum and index it so it will be raised forever. Prove that you are real Democrats and not just Republican clones.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: raise it forever Posted by: Leman
» RE: raise it forever Posted by: MatthewSavage
» Subsidy vs. Investment Posted by: Leman
» RE: Subsidy vs. Investment Posted by: MatthewSavage
» RE: Subsidy vs. Investment Posted by: HeroesAll
» RE: Subsidy vs. Investment Posted by: ALANHESTER
» RE: raise it forever Posted by: ALANHESTER
» RE: raise it forever Posted by: willymack
» RE: raise it forever Posted by: Leman
» RE: raise it forever Posted by: HeroesAll
» RE: raise it forever Posted by: Leman
» RE: raise it forever Posted by: rsaxto
» RE: raise it forever Posted by: Leman
» RE: raise it forever Posted by: rsaxto
» RE: raise it forever Posted by: picket
A COLA is only right!
Posted by: RON_KING on Nov 30, 2006 1:43 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Not having a COLA is a slow (or maybe not so slow) game of take-away.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

What'd be fair...
Posted by: OpinionsGetOld on Nov 30, 2006 2:12 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Yes, a COLA would be helpful to those of us unfortounate enough to have minimum wage jobs, since it would keep another 10 year gap in wage increases from happening...But why can't we have a minimum wage that at least allows us to hit the poverty level?

I'm begging for the right to live in poverty, how's that for the American Dream?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: What'd be fair... Posted by: ALANHESTER
Downsize Washington since they haven't done their job.
Posted by: jreinhart1 on Nov 30, 2006 5:42 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Perhaps a belt tightening should be performed in D.C. at the request of the States since the Federal system hasn't been able to work their way out of a paper bag in finding solutions to problems that the people want addressed, but are only good at creating war. Think Tanks, Lobbyists, Foundations and others are way beyond control. The people that work their don't live in reality and only give solutions that their corporate masters want from transnational banks and corporations, and military industrial complex, to the DoD and the wish list for things to blow up.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

What About the Working Poor????
Posted by: picket on Nov 30, 2006 8:46 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
7 million people in the USA are one paycheck away from being homeless.....we already have 3.5 MILLION HOMELESS citizens.
1% of the population in the USA own 33.4% of the wealth. good for them, they feel they are making jobs and helping by throwing multi charity events BUT .......could not the politicians keep a closer eye on the military industrial complex to eliminate fraud?? Then maybe throw a few crumbs to the disadvantaged.
I am really embarrassed for this country.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Out of the loop
Posted by: Mamarianne on Nov 30, 2006 9:49 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I read this article on the working poor soon after reading an article about the Bush twins being asked to shorten their Argentina vacation. I started web-searching to determine what they were vacationing from. They are almost 25. Do they work? Are they scholars? How has the spin machine been turned off for these gals when they are every bit as shapely and blonde as Paris and Brittany? Personally, I think that they should enlist and go to "stay" daddy's course. The next best thing would be to see them demonstrate how surviving is possible on benefit lacking, minimum wage pay checks.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Out of the loop Posted by: ALANHESTER
N.S.S.A.?
Posted by: edhowes on Nov 30, 2006 10:09 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Are we on the threshold of creating the New Sovereign States of America? I sure hope so. The system which was supposed to recognize sovereign citizens, sovereign states and a sovereign union of states, was co opted by the propertied elites who wrote the Constitution and the class rapidly corporatized the planet grabting itself a privilege no soverein possesses to bestow on another. Limited liability. This is the world's greatest fraud and no one questions it. But what if corporate slaves stood up and began pretending they were sovereigns, then demanded the same of 50 state governments? Citizen monitors and pressure groups could organize in every state and pass legislation which requires all state business to be publicly posted for a minimum of 30 days prior to congressional votes. Government sponsored forums would allow and tabulate pro and con forum posts and summarize them for the legislators prior to the vote. With the forum summaries posted every citizen can see which legislative reps voted in accordance with the public majorities and which against. All government budgets to be publicly displayed before a vote is taken. We have the technology to open secretive government to public scrutiny. Why aren't we doing so? Because people are neither asking for nor demanding it.

Imagine this: A White House Traitor wants to create a foreign war most people oppose, as they often do before the inevitable excuse and government fear mongering. Citizen activists organized in cells of 10, draft a demand to be sent to the state government and forwarded to the national reps. If the national rep does not honor the citizen will in a matter, citizens demand the state recalls that representative from office as is their Constitutional right. Now we need not wait for an election campaign to remove some corporate puppet from national office. Corporate lobbyists would then have to ply their trade in state capitols and citizens could monitor the corruption and vote it out, calling a special election if necessary.

All I am saying is a few thousand sovereign citizens can wrest control of government from corporate corruption by acting like sovereigns, even while slaving away on the great corporate plantation.

The great benefit of minimum wage increases at any level of government is never acknowledged or discussed. When all the promised corporate lay offs come and millions are thrown onto the unemployment roles, workers are forced to tighten their belts or illegally supplement their benefit check, working off the books. Often, that gives them enough time to build a business, forever off the books and the nation is strengthened by this free market economy which, if not for unlimited national credit would substantially downsize national government to its proper functions and make foreign wars impossible. All in favor of a fifty dollar minimum wage, say aye!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Consequences?
Posted by: Knowmad on Nov 30, 2006 10:45 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
You Americans must realise that nothing exists in isolation. I suspect the fact that you don't pay your neediest citizens a living wage impacts your society in many ways - their joining the military in disproportionate numbers for example.

I wouldn't be surprised if the following was somewhat of a consequence as well: Here, in numbers of prisoners per 100,000, are the latest estimates of incarceration ratios for the four countries that seem to make up the majority of Alternet posters:
Canada - 109, Australia - 124, England - 149, US - 734 . . . almost five times that of the runner-up England. Of course, the fact that the US has the least restrictive gun laws is a factor as well.

You took a great step forward with the midterms. Don't get complacent though; that was just the start of what's required to clean up the infection you've allowed to fester and grow for so long. Keep it up, for your own sake, as well as the rest of us.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Onya, Knowmad. Posted by: HeroesAll
» RE: Onya, Knowmad. Posted by: richviss
» RE: Onya, Knowmad. Posted by: ALANHESTER
» RE: Onya, Knowmad. Posted by: Knowmad
» RE: Onya, Knowmad. Posted by: richviss