Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

The Dem Congress Must Save the Internet

By Timothy Karr, TomPaine.com. Posted November 20, 2006.


The debate over net neutrality pits the special interests of the few against a massive grassroots effort.

As much as anything, last Tuesday's vote was also a call for Congress to end "business as usual" and return to governing in the public interest. Nowhere is this need more glaring than in media policymaking.

In the past 10 years, telecommunications, broadcasting and cable companies have spent more than half a billion dollars on campaign contributions, political action committees and high-priced lobbyists to push through self interested policies. These regulations -- offering massive tax breaks, relaxed ownership rules, and unfettered control of the public airwaves -- all come at our expense.

On the issue of net neutrality alone these companies spent more than $100 million last year -- pushing Congress to remove the longstanding nondiscrimination rules that enabled the Internet to become the greatest vehicle for free speech and economic innovation. Instead of a truly free market that encourages entrepreneurship and creativity, they're seeking special regulations that serve only to pad their bottom line.

In the coming weeks, major communications companies and their high-spending lobbyists will do everything they can to re-assert their control over Washington policymaking -- painting issues like net neutrality as "unnecessary government regulations" and dismissing the groundswell of public support for this issue as the handiwork of a few "liberal groups."

What these large media corporations don't say is that they have been the nation's biggest beneficiaries of -- and lobbyists for -- media regulations, just as long as they're written in their favor. The debate over net neutrality pits the special interests of the few against a massive grassroots effort. At SavetheInternet.com, more than a million people signed the petition urging Congress to maintain the free and open Internet. Thousands of bloggers have linked to the site -- many of them posting homemade videos to counteract the expensive misinformation campaign launched by Astroturf groups like Hands Off the Internet and TV4U that are funded by phone and cable companies.

This grassroots campaign -- which isn't backed by any corporate money -- has lifted the crucial issue of net neutrality from obscurity, throwing a wrench in the phone and cable giants' plan to overhaul our telecommunications laws behind closed doors.

The November 7 election results were a great leap forward in our efforts to save the free and open Internet.

Reps. John Dingell, D-Mich., and Ed Markey, D-Mass. -- both strong supporters of net neutrality -- will most likely take command of telecommunications policy when their party reclaims majority power in the House in 2007. In the Senate, all pro-net neutrality incumbent senators won decisive victories in their states. They will be joined by newcomers Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., Sherrod Brown, D-Ohio, Jim Webb, D-Va., and Amy Klobuchar D-Minn., who have also come out in support of net neutrality.

The major telecommunications bill pending in the Senate is a massive giveaway to the phone and cable companies, and should be blocked during the lame duck Congress. It's time to start from scratch in 2007, and the new Congress should treat the net neutrality debate as the first part of a broad public conversation about what the future of the Internet will look like. Whereas the phone companies had been confident that Congress would simply sign-off on industry-written legislation, today no member of Congress can vote with the telecom cartel without full public scrutiny.

The broad coalition that has formed to support net neutrality is encouraged that many of the new faces of leadership in both houses have already announced staunch support for the issue.

It's time others followed their lead in 2007, and we began working with the public to save the Internet.

Digg!

See more stories tagged with: telecommunications, net neutrality, intermet

Timothy Karr is the author of MediaCitizen, a weblog about the future of America's media. He is the campaign director of Free Press. From September 2003 through February 2005, Karr was executive director of MediaChannel.org and Media for Democracy.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
idiots
Posted by: rsaxto on Nov 20, 2006 1:13 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The corporate idiots and the Bushies who are trying to destroy the internet freedom that exists for the people need to be given a decisive thrashing for their fascist greed. Everyone who votes to trash the internet and is up for election in 08 needs to get zero votes from all rational thinking people.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: idiots Posted by: AlienSlave
» RE: idiots Posted by: willymack
» RE: idiots Posted by: AlienSlave
» RE: idiots Posted by: rsaxto
» RE: idiots Posted by: rsaxto
spread the world
Posted by: Rshaw on Nov 20, 2006 2:25 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Spread the word about this issue with THIS VIDEO

The more people on our side the better. God knows there's a lot of money on the other side.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: spread the world Posted by: Donna_Darko
More Lies from the Telecom idiots
Posted by: sabresong on Nov 20, 2006 4:57 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I live in an area serviced by BellSouth. And BellSouth services us right up our backsides. But now, on the net neutrality issues, they're gtetting a bit worried.

Yesterday, I saw an ad by the cable company, together with other telecom giants including BS, telling the viewer that net neutrality will cost the taxpayer and the telecom customer billions of dollars. That message carried the implied threat that if we allow net neutrality to continue, our internet and telecommunications rates will be raised dramatically.

This is extortion. Ever since the deregulation of the telecommunications industry, these companies have been running rampant, screwing the average person out of hundreds, even thousands of dollars a year through lies and deception, all the while knowing there's nothing we can do, because there is NO real competition in the industry. The breakup of Ma Bell was a farce. The baby bells still hold a monopoly, as do the cable companies.

Get the word out. Net neutrality has always been, therefore it will NOT cost us more. Demand that Congress hold the telecommunications industry accountable, that the corporate giants not be permitted to penalize us for refusing to be bullied and lied to.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

85 years vs 45 seconds
Posted by: AlienSlave on Nov 20, 2006 5:37 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The difference between our internet speed and the Korean and Asian internet speeds are this; to down load what would contain the complete content of the Library of Congress would take an American connection 85 years today. Try any Asian High speed fiber optics and the down load is only 45 seconds. The price they pay for fiber optics right now is near or equivalent to a cheap dial up here. I would strongly encourage you pack along a laptop and take a vacation to an Asian country this winter instead of the commercialized status quo south get out into the real world and experience the culture shock of how ignorant, deprived and controlled you are by big business. Oh yea while you are there you can pick up a cool cell phone that displays movies better than a wide screen Tv for $50. You cannot use it for movies when you get back to the USA though, but for $50 that shouldn’t be a problem. But you will still have worldwide coverage for the phone.
AlienSlave

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

More of the Same
Posted by: NoPCZone on Nov 20, 2006 7:37 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What the Telcos want to give you is more of the same: inferior service at the highest prices they can get away with- just like Cell Phone service. Watch the Lame Duck Congress very closely, the Bushies are going to try to push a bunch of stuff through over the next couple of weeks.

Public Citizen has set up a special website to track the actions of the Lame Duck Congress. Bookmark it and keep watch. Your action may be needed.

http://citizen.typepad.com/lameduckhunt/

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Details!
Posted by: edith on Nov 20, 2006 7:37 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The author doesn't explain exactly what will change if the telecoms overturn net neutrality. does it mean that we'd have to pay to use a search engine?

Does it mean that you need fed approval to have a website? Lobbyinst thrive on the ignorance of the public. Well, I'll confess: I'm ignorant of what this all means other than the author says that telecosm are planning something big that will somehow hurt our access to internet. OK, I'm sure he's sincere. but he won't get a congressman's vote with a vague argument. Facts! Please!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Details! Posted by: AlienSlave
» RE: Details! Posted by: brunowe
» RE: THANKS for Details! Posted by: edith
Neuter Net or Net Neutrality is only part of our choice.
Posted by: stockpix on Nov 20, 2006 10:00 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It means that your provider can choose to capriciously block content without any recourse. There has already been a case where craigslist was blocked by I believe a cable company for a fair period of time, coincidentally, it just happened this cable company owned a competing website.

It also means that only large players will be able to compete in and afford the highest speed of content providing. This will squelch the ability of most of us to compete on a level playing field that has been the primary hallmark of the Internet up to now.

It basically means that the Internet would not be a common carrier. It means that corporations would be able to control what you see on the Internet like they do so effectively on the broadcast media. Would GE choose to block gesucks.com? Gee, I don' know.

I think at the turn of the last century, Common carrier statutes for railroads stopped differential pricing that was being used for grossly unfair competition. It stopped the railroad barons from favoring their partners and pricing their partners' competition out of business. This common carrier requirement is exactly what is under attack on the telecommunications lines.

Net neutered or net neutrality.

Net neutrality is only the tip of the the iceberg. The telecommunications companies have not been given any oversight since they extorted tax breaks and deregulations as incentives to build fast pipes to our homes. They not only failed to deliver but they have systematically stifled the sort of competition and government actions that have brought real broadband to citizens in Korea and Japan at far lower cost than we pay for snail fast service. I completely agree with most of the 85 years vs 45 seconds post. It is truly that stark a betrayal.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

PETITION
Posted by: SALLY EVANS on Nov 20, 2006 10:06 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
SO WHERE IS THE PETITION TO SIGN AGAINST THE DERANGED BUSHIES?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: PETITION Posted by: mr. joshua
last hurrah for free speech
Posted by: makesenseofit on Nov 20, 2006 5:13 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The Democrats must stop the right wing neo cons from stealilng our rights of free speech, freedom to rally, etc. The war on terror is the way to go to keep the country under control and continue to plow away the constitution at the expense of the American people.
Remeber the democrats would of had no chance after the 2000 elections if the internet was not free to use and debate and discuss.
The controlling factors would do exactly that by taking away the ability of the people to discuss the elections. Especially elections that are not accurately tabulated. With machines that squeal fraud once the vote is made..
This is the last HURRAH for freedom of speech and the PEOPLE better wise up get their voice heard...
Thank you and good nite

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Porn, Free Speech, Gambling, Racism, and Protest
Posted by: albrechtkrausse on Nov 20, 2006 7:21 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
is the 'reason' why they keep trying to restrict, change, and monitor the internet. In actuality, of course, the elites, and their pawns in our selected legislatures, like to keep these sites open and available (albeit sometimes enacting laws so poorly written so that they are 'declared' unconstitutional- so the pawns can say 'we tried but those damn judges/justices'). The reason is for manipulation of people who have influence/control. Remember the Foley 'incident'? This is the reason. They want to maintain, like Hoover but more high-tech, a database of 'information' on everyone. If you step out of line it will be used against you, but, more importantly, its used to capture people in relative online infancy and channel them into more depravity, which is then even better for blackmail. Much like the mob or any other criminal enterprise the elite need people to commit crimes in order to keep them in the fold and have leverage over them. When one is in the crimes and licentiousness increase with the power.

Once anyone comes into a position of power, or questions the system and becomes a threat, the elites can hold over their head their sexual, moral, philosophical, financial, racial, political, etc postings, habits, piccadilloes, perversions, or whatever. Everything online is monitored, recorded, archived, cross-referenced, and filed away for 'future use'.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

In the coming weeks?
Posted by: Donna_Darko on Nov 20, 2006 11:04 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
In the coming weeks, major communications companies and their high-spending lobbyists will do everything they can to re-assert their control over Washington policymaking

Call your Congressperson in support of Net Neutrality. The Democrats would not have won this election without Moveon.org and the blogosphere. Period.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Wrong answer
Posted by: sabresong on Nov 21, 2006 5:01 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Our job, those of us who follow these issues and try to keep others informed, is to inform. Telling somene who asks for details to go out and search for them without at least giving them a starting point is not helping us get the information where it is needed ... to the people who can influence the legislators. You're right that we all need to do our research and formulate our own opinions, but refusing to even give a starting place will only serve to alienate people, thus driving them AWAY from the very research you suggest they perform.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Oops Posted by: sabresong
Save the internet or else!
Posted by: champion on Nov 22, 2006 4:42 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The last bastion of truth, the internet, cannot be ended by be-
coming privatized. If so, free speech, criticism of government,
different views, and so forth will be replaced by government
sponsored propaganda.

There is some truth on tv, in print, and on radio, but it is drowned
out by the buttkissers of the elite politicians, whether Republi-
can or Democrat. The truth about what government does is
on the internet, and it is there where they are being held
accountable most, which is great and sad at the same time.

If the internet is corrupted and silenced by those indiviuals
who want an end to it, ask yourself why and for what reason?
The answer is pure and simple, control over WE THE PEOPLE.
There will be no accountability, truth gathering, crticism, and
such of government, which would scare the hell out of me.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]