Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Young Borrowers Face A Life of Debt

By G. Pascal Zachary, AlterNet. Posted November 18, 2006.


Veteran TV journalist and media critic Danny Schechter's new film, "In Debt We Trust," shows us how financial insecurity has become a staple of American life.
111806story

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

Also in Top Stories

America's Frightening Alzheimer's Epidemic
Rebecca Hyman, AlterNet

Dire Consequences with a McCain Supreme Court?
Robert Parry, Consortium News

CNN's Lou Dobbs Is Clueless When It Comes to the Drug War
Tony Newman, AlterNet

California Gay Marriage Ban Overturned
Huffington Post

Election 08: Misogyny I Will Not Miss
Marie Cocco, Washington Post Writers Group

Three Things That Won't Help End the Foreclosure Crisis
Dean Baker, Liz Chimienti, Center for Economic and Policy Research

More stories by G. Pascal Zachary

Get AlterNet in
your mailbox!

 
Advertisement

Financial insecurity is one of the staples of American life, and fuel for our nation's politics as well as cable TV shows. Once the elderly worried endlessly about money matters, athough now people over 65 count as the wealthiest group of Americans. Rather, today the biggest worriers about what's euphemistically called our "financial future" are the young, and especially people under 25 years old.

For new college graduates and people out of school for only a few years, financial worries are enormous. Home prices, even if they are starting to fall, remain very high relative to ordinary incomes, and higher mortgage rates are no balm to money worries either. All Americans carry more debt on average than in the past but the increase for young people is most striking since young workers generally earn the least. Between college loans and car loans, people in their 20s are amazingly burdened financially compared to earlier generations, especially compared to my own generation of late-stage baby-boomer.

If in the 1960s and early 70s, my college friends and new graduates shouted, "Burn baby burn," to signify their desire to tearing down the status quo, youth today embrace the credo, "Borrow, baby, borrow" because of their dependency on cheap credit without which their chances of building a decent middle-class life seem poor to none.

If you wonder why borrowed money fuels the lifestyles of all ages, turn on a new documentary, "In Debt We Trust," by the veteran dissenting TV journalist and media critic, Danny Schechter. "In Debt We Trust" vividly shows how Americans get ensnared in a web of debt spun by a "credit industrial complex" that almost seems to function like a conspiracy to drive people into financial servitude. Schechter's central insight is bold, provocative and timely. As he quotes a Brooklyn consumer activist, "Debt is profitable."

Out of this kernel of truth comes Schechter's fascinating tour of the various ways that lenders earn money, chiefly through short-term loans through credit cards. While the abuses of card companies are well known, Schechter sheds light on some emerging credit practices that will inspire outrage in his viewers. One of the most insidious is a service by H. & R. Block to loan money against future tax returns at very high rates.

In narrating the 90-minute documentary, Schechter generally maintains an even tone, cogently making the case for how credit-card companies promote "excessive debt" and the costs of becoming addicted to revolving-credit, whereby a customer pays off only the interest on a loan each month. He also smartly finds common ground between progressives and conservatives who both preach against the perils of dependency on borrowed money. There really is bi-partisan support for clamping down on companies that suck the financial blood of debt-ridden consumers. And more broadly, the perils of too much debt are real, both for individuals and the national government, whose borrowings have reached record levels and continue to mount because of supersized-budget deficits greatly worsened by unwise tax cuts.

A day of reckoning is not out of the question; the debt bomb may yet explode, taking American prosperity with it. Housing values are falling, most everywhere now, and that's perilous for American consumers who, as "In Debt We Trust" shows, have used home-equity borrowing as a piggybank for years. On a national level, the bubble can burst too. The size of the federal debt, and the growing dependence on China to cover this debt through purchases of Treasury Bills, could lead to a collapse in the value of the dollar and a sharp, steep rise in interest rates, choking off the very lending that fuels economic activity and bringing about severe economic contraction, along with job losses and wage declines.

When Schechter preaches about "American before the big bursts," he means a calamity along these lines. Predicting financial plunges is tricky business, and Schechter fails to make a compelling case for an approaching apocalypse. However, even if the debt bubble doesn't burst, "In Debt We Trust" delivers a powerful wake-up call to consumers, especially young ones. Most important is the film's insistence that debt isn't purely personal but wholly political too. The excesses of the industry built on personal debt deserve a political response and "In Debt We Trust" gives an introduction to how the political backlash against personal debt may unfold.

Unfortunately, Schechter says too little about the contours of the coming backlash, though he wisely examines the recent revisions to the law on personal bankruptcy. He quotes Rep. Sheila Jackson Lee calling the law an "atrocity." Lee's hyperbolic language (and there is much more of it in the film) is justified. The new bankruptcy law greatly assists credit-card companies by making it far more difficult for ordinary people to escape debts that they have no chance of paying off. The new Congress should roll back this new bankruptcy law, restoring a fair playing field for borrowers who aren't solely responsible for their debts (lenders are too; they took the risk of lending in the first place, remember).


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: debt, youth, credit, loan, economy

G. Pascal Zachary, a frequent contributor to AlterNet, is the author of Endless Frontier: Vannevar Bush, Engineer of the American Century.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
richest
Posted by: rsaxto on Nov 18, 2006 12:33 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The Bushies put the richest of the rich in charge of everything so naturally they are trying to loot everyone that they can extract money from and they have become quite successful at it. The presidency and the congress are quite well paid to suck every dime they can get their hands on from the middle class and the poor. Along with the untrammeled greed will come a point in the future where stock shock and depression will bring this whole house of greedy cards crashing down. The only way to prevent this is to repeal each and every financial law that has been passed by the Bushies. If congress doesn't wake up and do this our whole society is doomed.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: richest Posted by: billfaster
» RE: richest Posted by: rsaxto
» RE: richest Posted by: Daniel Shays
» RE: richest Posted by: rsaxto
» Apples and oranges Posted by: kepstein7777
» RE: Apples and oranges Posted by: willymack
» RE: Apples and oranges Posted by: rsaxto
» RE: Apples and oranges Posted by: billfaster
» RE: ENOUGH!!!!!! Posted by: The Butcher
» RE: NOUGH!!!!!! Posted by: rsaxto
Symptoms or Causes?
Posted by: anothername on Nov 18, 2006 3:45 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As I often note when commenting on AlterNet, there are many components of this problem ignored yet I will comment on only a few.

With obesity, discussion almost never turns to the reality that Americans have reduced their walking time due to growing dangers caused by increased automotive traffic and reduced presence of sidewalks or to the very low cost of subsidized corn production and the higher price of subsidized sugar. The problem lies just with the wanton selfishness of Americans and the greedy corporations that package empty calories. With debt, discussion almost never turns to the reasons why it has increased beyond selfish consumerism and the buy-now mentality of Americans.

Government tells us to buy houses and gives incentives to developers and purchasers towards this goal. Apartment buildings are built in the least attractive parts of communities or are so filled with amenities that the costs increase. Then, just to find an apartment includes growing application fees, higher property tax rates passed on to the renter, and other costs and delays. In my case, as I used to move frequently, I found myself increasingly having to spend more money on longer hotel stays because I couldn't quickly move into decent apartments. This creates an economic drain that sooner or later ends up on credit cards or in other high-interest rate loans.

As minimum wage languished for 10 years, executives, managers, and people with well-paying jobs spent more and more on housing and pushed the Internet to a bandwidth-heavy functionality. Thus, the people in the lower half of income brackets were forced to pay more for housing as prices were bid up and were forced to spend more on DSL or an equivalent system just to deal with flashing media, flowing graphics, and other add-ons that have already created an Internet that is not neutral. Then there is the reduction of public transit service across the nation that has forced more people into personal automobiles at much higher direct and indirect costs.

Yes, the credit card companies and other businesses are taking advantage of the situation and making it worse. I figuratively yell, and strongly comment literally, to the companies whose credit cards I use for personal and business expenses that I would much rather have a lower interest rate than to see my hard-earned money wasted on incentive programs. Heck, just by eliminating what the companies spend in salaries to the executives and workers who develop these programs and the printing and mailing costs for all the junk, the interest rates on the cards could probably be reduced by 2%-3% easily.

This doesn't even take into account the cost of landfills, waste hauling, pollution from production, cost of gasoline and pollution to move all the material items around. It doesn't discuss how unions helped create a more even income distribution so one group wasn't pricing the other out of the marketplace and putting each other into heavy debt. It doesn't look at the history of company towns where workers could never get out of debt.

Yes, debt can be both good and bad. It provides for managed risks. Yet, we also have to look beyond the issue of debt to how money is distributed in the U.S., including the investment capital. The recent IPO of Hertz, where a group of investors had bought the company, drained resources, then offered it for sale with the IPO earnings going to the investors who walked away with easy millions and relatively little of the raised funds going to the operation, capitalization, or expansion of the business. All that money in the stock market is making a few people very happy.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Being poor is very expensive
Posted by: kepstein7777 on Nov 18, 2006 4:19 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Credit card interest is just one thing on a long list: payroll taxes, pmi, rent, no interest checking accounts, payment plans...

Working folks living from paycheck to paycheck have a much higher cost of living than the wealthy. Few seem to notice...but I guess they're not supposed to notice.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Being poor is very expensive Posted by: billfaster
System is a lie
Posted by: albrechtkrausse on Nov 18, 2006 6:01 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Get rid of the FED and go back on a gold or silver standard. A system grown from a poisonous lie cannot be expected to grow into a tree that bears good fruit. The whole idea of a privately-controlled bank, the FED, which lends fake money to the governement with interest is the beginning of the problem. Our 'money' is only back by the 'full faith and credit of the US government'! After all the lies, fake information, scandals, and corruption I'm amazed that anyone trusts it Well the smart players (like China, oil shieks, super-rich families, trusts, etc) don't and are buying gold, realestate in other countries, moving to price their commodity exchanges in Euros, etc. Destroy the FED, go back to real money, strenghten usury laws.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: System is a lie Posted by: willymack
» RE: System is a lie Posted by: albrechtkrausse
» RE: System is a lie Posted by: richviss
» RE: System is a lie Posted by: albrechtkrausse
» Fed = money laundering Posted by: MAD
Derf
Posted by: derfb1 on Nov 18, 2006 6:47 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
FDR started the downhill spiral of debt when he took office in 1933. He used Maynard Keynes, a gay English economist, as an expert on dficit spending (as did Adolph Hitler). The USA always paid as they went until the Democrats took office. Our economy has been garbage ever since and we the people owe more and more. Thanks Roosevelt.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Derf Posted by: maddy
» RE: Derf Posted by: derfb1
» RE: Derf Posted by: Scientz
» RE: Derf Posted by: jdub
» Gay economist? Posted by: patvic1405
» It does to a reichwing troll. Posted by: may261989
It's Even Bigger Than You Think
Posted by: MAT on Nov 18, 2006 6:49 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Debt is just one symptom of a much more fundamental condition lying at the root of this and many other issues that need to be addressed; unchecked human nature. No matter what political/social/economic constructs are built, human motivation and ingenuity will try to find a way to get around/over/under the wall.

Let's face it, we're animals, mammals to be exact. We hunt, we gather, we seek out the resources to survive and thrive. We utilize the strengths of groups to control territory and defend our resources and ourselves. Typically, alpha males, being the loudest, strongest, most aggressive and most cunning get the spoils of overseeing the whole operation.

However, it is our intellect, our ability to reason and create which differentiates us from the rest of the animal kingdom. We are at the point where we have devised many clever constructs beyond sheer brute force, albeit an arguable assertion, so that the alpha male can remain on top.

The good news is that we are moving in the right direction. These days, the alpha female can get hers, even the alpha black/hispanic man can get in on the game and you can even cash in outside of western 'rich' nations and so on. Heck, just about anyone who is aggressive/clever/unscrupulous enough can lead their own pack and even subjugate others more efficiently. Did I say good news? I meant encouraging news...at least now we can start to see that this 'alpha syndrome' is an inherent component owned by all of humanity.

Now the question is, how do we get this thing under grips and start to utilize our human ingenuity and (ultimately) our instinct to survive, in a much more sustainable and effective fashion rather than the pure pursuit of selfish spoils?

Sure we can tackle and solve our debt and many other problems but based on what motivations? Our motivations for solving problems are typically based on our natural survival instincts in conjunction with personal desires. It seems to be a logical conclusion that if we can do a better job of accepting and regulating the excess of our instinctual vices while influencing our personal desires via education, we might just have a decent shot at working something reasonable out. Think of it as nature working with nurture as opposed to versus.

We need to be honest and upfront in assessing who we are, what our true desires/needs are and start to re-engineer our political/social/economic constructs using human ingenuity to overcome excessive human aggressiveness.

Towards the end of the article the author makes a very good point that one of the first steps in any recovery program are awareness and acceptance of the problem. Right now, that goal is being made more difficult because the powerful industries behind the problem are pushing harder to perpetuate it.

That’s why it’s up to us, “We The People” to take effective action and guide the process; we’re very effective en-masse. The real good news is that We, for the first time in the history of mankind, are able to effectively work together in this internet ‘age of acceleration’.

For my part, I see that I have a few more ideas to materialize in the next serveral days; I invite you to join me in the effort to spread awareness of this and many other issues. It’s time the ‘alpha people’ realize that it's Our America Too.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» a better way to start a cult Posted by: owleyes
Credit card companies are major donors to political campaigns
Posted by: thoughtcriminal on Nov 18, 2006 7:15 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
From the article: "There really is bi-partisan support for clamping down on companies that suck the financial blood of debt-ridden consumers."

There's not much evidence to support that claim. The Congress under Republican rule has taken the side of the credit card and finance companies against the public every time. It'll be interesting to see if the Democratic Congress is any different (Bush would surely veto any legislation).

Bush Donors Reap Big Dividends from Taxpayers; At least 200 of Bush's "Pioneers" and "Rangers" have reaped financial benefit

The basic fact is that credit cards and loans are generally very, very bad ideas. Loans for starting a business or building a house might be one exception, depending on the structure of the loans. Eventually, the whole country is going to go bankrupt, thanks to Republican policies - why do you think Cheney keeps a good fraction of his ~100 million fortune in euros?

Milton Friedman just passed away - one of the founders of Monetarism (control of the monentary supply) economics and a product of John D.Rockefeller's University of Chicago, as well as a recipient of the tacked-on "Nobel Prize in Economics". Economics is often little more than an attempt to provide a scientific basis for massive wealth disparities, as a replacement for the old religious explanation of divine providence and will.

Much of "Modern economic theory" is just tripe aimed at justifying the current wealth distribution in Western societies. It's noblesse oblige - the wise and wealthy nobility has a responsibility to care for the economic well-being of the unwashed masses. In reality, it's those very masses that are footing the bill for royalty - nothing much has changed.

In particular, the notion that the poorer classes should have to bury themselves in debt to get a decent college education and make a living is ridiculous. It guarantees ten or twenty years of payments to the banks that hold the federal loans. Credit cards are traps for the foolish and unwary, but how else is someone from inner-city or rural America going to get an education at our expensive 'public' universities?

Current debt laws in the USA are just part of a system aimed at keeping poor people poor and transferring what little assets they may possess to the credit and finance corporations. There are no real benefits of cheap credit. American's don't get to 'live their dreams'; they're suckered into deceitful financial arrangements that keep them as captive servants for decades.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Lack of Regulation and a Corrupt Congress
Posted by: sofla100 on Nov 18, 2006 7:17 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This article only tells part of the story and has its own implied assumptions about the debt explosion. Not considered are the usury interest rates credit card companies charge, as high as 24% or more for "bad credit" cases, mushrooming college student loan debt due to cutbacks in student loan programs, and that wages have moatly remained stagnant over the past decade. The new bankruptcy law is mentioned, which was a complete "cave-in" to the banks. By the way, Hillary initially was all opposed to the new bankruptcy law, until the campaign contributions started to roll in, banks and insurance companies contributing millions to her, and sure enough she changed to support the new law. What America sorely lacks now is sufficient regulation of the banking, insurance, and lending sectors. Strict usury laws, repeal of the new bankruptcy law and regulation of the insurance industries is sorely needed. The Repubs have gutted all meaningful regulation of these entitites in order to take care of contributors and friends, to the severe detriment of the "common man." Even with the Dems in there, so much money is involved and the banks, credit card companies and insurance companies now darn well they can buy whatever legislation they want. So, it looks to me like more and more Americans will continue to go down the debt sewer.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Give Us More
Posted by: edhowes on Nov 18, 2006 7:21 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The New Age Depression will likely be America's greatest gift to the world. Production and consumption will take the necessary nosedive required to rethink the reasons why Americans deserve so much and all others so little. Today, we are too busy chasing more to care that any are doing without. The attitude has been for half a century; "I'm getting mine. To hell with my grandchildren and everybody else." The grandchildren are now dealing with the result of this destruction of extended family where credit has become the chief substitute for reason and wisdom. When we follow the money, it is always the same beneficiaries, whether we are talking war or credit and only a few can be bothered to connect these dots.

Irresponsibility and unaccountability goes hand in hand with corruption and greed in high places. The result is a burgeoning lawlessness and economic free for alls. Nothing matters beyond escaping blame. It is all someone else's fault and I am just along for the ride. The people who have the solutions speak to a deaf and blind public, or the choir but they do not talk to each other about the effective applications of solutions to the problems. Their answer is invariably to create mass movements which will never happen. Knowing this deep down, the aware are also blameless. Nobody is listening, what are they supposed to do?

You don't get rid of the Federal Reserve when all workers are tithing 15% of their weekly pay to its support and operation. The people who rule the world are totally unconcerned with any citizen protest unless it becomes popular. Since the masters of the universe can come on their media and give the public irresistable new and better ideas, they nip all movements in the bud.

With the U.S. dollar losing about 8% of its face value each year, no matter what the official inflation numbers, the borrower does much better than the saver, unless that saver is buying gold or silver. Very few do. So credit becomes the poor man's hedge. The longer he can take paying off even high interest debt, the less the credit is costing.

What we all need is government credit. Increase the limit every year, continue the borrowing every year, pay a fixed 5% on the principal and only pay the interest. That individuals do not get such favorable terms is no surprise. Individuals have no bargaining power with central banks. Once the people have formed a habit of supporting the global rule of corporate bankers, they will only break the habit when it is forced upon them by unemployment and they are no longer too busy playing the game to think about the alternatives. This depression will be the real wake up call. The 911 event was only a snooze alarm.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Meet MBNA, Enrons replacement as Bush's #1 donor
Posted by: thoughtcriminal on Nov 18, 2006 7:31 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
http://reclaimdemocracy.org/articles_2005/ bush_investors_dividends_taxpayers.php

Here's an example of how Congress and the President have worked together to make sure Americans stay in debt and keep making their payments:

"Credit-card giant MBNA wanted to collect more of its customers' debts.

The Delaware-based company has supplied 54 million Americans with novelty credit cards displaying Elvis Presley, a charging Florida State University Seminole on horseback, or an Icelandair flight cruising above the Atlantic Ocean.

The seduction by plastic includes bonus points, "Love Me Tender" teddy bears, and occasionally personal bankruptcy.

When MBNA's customers filed Chapter 7 bankruptcy, courts wiped their credit balances away. MBNA wrote off $4.1 billion in unpaid credit-card bills last year.

To stem the losses, the company worked to change the rules. It spent nearly $20 million from 1998 to 2004 to lobby Congress on issues including bankruptcy reform. Even before Mr. Clinton killed a reform bill late in his second term, MBNA had turned to George W. Bush.

MBNA employees gave the Bush campaign more than $200,000 in 2000, the most of any company, and allowed the campaign to use an MBNA corporate jet. The new president pushed bankruptcy reform in his first term, but an unrelated congressional dispute scuttled it.

The company worked hard for Mr. Bush again last year. Former MBNA CEO Charles Cawley and Vice Chairman Lance Loring Weaver both qualified as Rangers, each raising at least $200,000 for the President's re-election.

MBNA surpassed Enron last year to become the largest corporate patron of Mr. Bush's career, according to the Center for Responsive Politics in Washington.

The eight-year struggle for bankruptcy reform ended within 90 days of Mr. Bush's second inaugural address. The 500-page law, initially crafted by a financial services lobbyist, mandates credit counseling for prospective filers and makes it harder to escape credit-card debt.

"The legislation in effect deputizes the bankruptcy courts as collection agents for the credit-card companies," said Mark Sargent, dean of Villanova University's law school, a bankruptcy expert, and critic of the bill. "The great irony of this is that it's having your cake and eating it too. They push credit to anyone with a pulse."

Americans received 5.23 billion credit-card mailings - 18 offers for each man, woman, and child - in 2004, according to Vertis, a marketing consultant. About 1.6 million households filed for bankruptcy last year, according to the American Bankruptcy Institute, up from 287,570 in 1980.

The reform law's implementation in October caused a temporary spike in bankruptcy filings that will hurt MBNA's short-term profits but should reduce future bankruptcy filings, the company said in its quarterly filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Todd Zywicki, a George Mason University law professor who favors the law, testified to a Senate committee that credit-card companies would receive an additional $3 billion each year with its passage.

Based on the market share figures compiled by the industry analyst Web site cardweb.com, the law will give MBNA about $380 million more annually. That figure would feed the company's yearly profit of $2.6 billion.

In June, after the law passed, Bank of America agreed to purchase MBNA for $35 billion, 31 percent above the company's market value at the time. An analyst called the sale price "rich."..."

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» You don't even need a pulse Posted by: reverendg
It IS a conspiracy
Posted by: profmarcus on Nov 18, 2006 8:11 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
for me, the worst part of coming back to the united states is seeing how people are so completely enslaved by the consumer economy... this article skirts around the edges of the real issue, but then wusses out...

first of all, it ain't just young people fresh out of school, although i am watching my 23 year-old daughter struggling with all the above... my son and his wife, in their mid-30s, both holding good jobs with a very respectable combined income, are carrying a debt burden that i find positively staggering, and probably won't see daylight for at least 30 more years...

look, let's get really, really real... it "almost seems to function like a conspiracy" because that's exactly what it is... if you're burdened by huge debt, what other choice do you have but to keep working to pay it off, supporting the same system that put you in that dilemma in the first place... this article's author, however, seems to reveal the depth of his own "consumer society" brainwashing, because he just can't resist extolling the virtues of materialism...

now that i'm spending the majority of my time living outside the u.s., i am stupefied at how big the trade-off of getting to "live their dreams" is for americans... while it's true that having the latest gadget is an obsession the world over, there is nowhere that is more true than in the united states... constantly, everywhere i go here, people are rushing madly about in search of the latest "thing" guaranteed to make them happy... it's impossible to avoid because those "things" are constantly in your face, everywhere, all the time... coming in from south america, three hours after landing, i am with my daughter-in-law and her mother in a hospital gift shop to rival any large store in a shopping mall... oh, it's a conspiracy, all right... don't think for one minute that it isn't...

And, yes, I DO take it personally

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» What other choice? Posted by: Cathyc
» RE: What other choice? Posted by: DaBear
» Hear, hear! Posted by: scryberwitch
OK kiddies, gather around. It's time for a parity lesson.
Posted by: AdamG on Nov 18, 2006 8:29 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We live on the Earth. All wealth as we know it, comes from the interaction between the Sun and the Earth. The Sun provides most, if not all, of the energy needed to perpetuate environments through the earth's natural processes. Ecology is a relationship where individual aspects of environments interact to meet their own needs while simultaneously providing for the continuance of the system as a whole. Economy is the relationship between people and people's and how they interact to meet their own needs. We have a collision where economy and ecology meet.

Ideally, we as a society, would interact with the environment in a way that conserves resources, at minimum, and enhances them to ensure their supply in the future. As human societies developed, less and less people directly interacted with the environment directly in order to process raw materials procurred by others in order to manufacture more complex tools. Eventually, as people developed agriculture and surplus food, societies were enabled to not only manufacture goods and tools but institutions. This required a mechanism to encourage those that interact with the environment to procur more then they, and society as a whole, need to meet their immediate needs. That mechanism is debt.

No longer did people get only what they need. This was initially possible only because of the abundance of resources. In essence, the Earth and all it's resources are capital. Ideally, we would live off the interest created by the interaction of the Earth and Sun. Instead, we have drawing from the capital of the Earth. This liquidation of the "capital" enabled the human population explosion that started 10,000 years ago.

This worked until societies depleted the natural capital of a locality of an area to the point of ecological bankruptcy. This is now evident in the deserts of the Arabian Peninsula, the Shara, the Sahel, and most other wind swept sand dunes. Very few deserts are natural with a few exceptions (the Atacama Desert is one). This fueled the migration and conquest into new areas. This also fueled ever more complex institutions of debt.

As civilsation marched into nearly every corner of the world another mechanism was developed to enable global conquest. That was the undervaluation of natural resources. There were always new abundant areas to exploit so raw materials were valued in such a way as to not encourage their conservation as there was always somewhere else to get them cheaper.

We have nearly migrated into and conquered most areas of the planet. We have overexploited nearly ever resource to the extent as to affect their perpetuation. We have also constructed one of the most sophisticated system of institutionalized debt ever seen. Quite literally, we have run into a wall. It is time to turn around and examine what we have done.

Think of the Earth as a pie. We have been eating the pie but attaching an ever inflating number, or value, on it. It's like buying a car, drive it, and then trying to sell it for more then we bought it for even thugh we have depreciated it's value. It only works as long as there is someone else foolish enough to buy it ( a pyramid scheme). I terms of the Earth and societies, it only works as long as there is enough physical "stuff" of tangible value to back the value of currency that is held. It is my premise that we are so far beyond this point that if everyone on Earth went to get something of actual value, raw materials, there would not be enough "stuff" even if we liquidated the entire Earth. Basically, if we pumped every drop of oil, cut every tree, mined every ore, there would not be enough to cover every dollar, Euro, Yuan, etc. The Earth would, in essence, default on us. Civilisation on a global scale, and not just a localised scale, would collapse.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Not EVIL?!
Posted by: monkeywrench on Nov 18, 2006 8:53 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
From the article:
"The card companies are a cartel. . .They use the same techniques. There are people who see techniques, and the companies who use them, as evil. I don't personally like those terms. . . They are chasing revenue and AND THEY DON'T CARE HOW THEY GET IT [capitals mine]. They go over the top."

Excuse me, but if this isn't evil, it is one hell of a substitute.

The only difference between credit card companies and the Mafia is that c.c. companies don't break your legs if you don't pay up (yet). They don't have to; they now have the full weight of the federal government behind them.

So much for "Of the People, by the People, and for the People." "The People" need to realize this concept has died in America. How long can a society remain whole when it not only has to fight its businesses, but its own government as well? I'm afraid – very afraid – that we're going to find out.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Solutions
Posted by: AdamG on Nov 18, 2006 8:53 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Solution number one, stop borrowing! Stop borrowing both publicly and privately. Stop voting for bond measures. Abolish the Fed, as they are "the evil overlords" if there is any. Abolish the World Bank and IMF. Abolish depredatory trade treaties.

On the local, proactive scale, there is much that we can do. Number one, pay more for food. Food is the number one resource. 70% of the materials needed to run our economy derive from food as even labour, by extension, is food as we need to eat to work and procreate new workers. Either grow food yourself and buy it from someone you know. Help directly support people who interact directly with the environment in a way that ensures resource conservation and enhancement. We cannot continue to trust and depend on those who do not act in the best interest of the Earth or it's citizen's. As our institutions grow in size and scale, they become less and less knowable and therefore accountable. Who among us really can grasp a trillion, much less 100 trillion? Basically, if you can't wrap your mind around the scale and scope of an institution and your hands around the neck of those who administer it, NEITHER CAN BE HELD ACCOUNTABLE! WAKE UP PEOPLE, TAKE YOUR RIGHTS AND RESPONSIBILITIES BACK!

This whole Earth and it's natural processes depend upon us. Every moment we have is because of untold amounts of sacrifice. In a literal sense, this place loves us unconditionally. Stars die, releasing the elements of the air we breathe. Every breathe we take is because of a star's death affording us that opportunity. If we don't observe, acknowledge, and reciprocate that same level of sacrifice, we are doomed. There will come a point in our relationship with the Earth where it will no longer be able to accomodate us.

Please, stand together with all other citizen's of the Earth, hand in hand, hearts wide open. Do not take the gift we have been given for granted any longer. The world is patiently waiting.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Solutions Posted by: DaBear
» RE: Solutions Posted by: AdamG
» RE: Solutions Posted by: DaBear
» RE: Solutions Posted by: JSquercia
Another approach
Posted by: anothername on Nov 18, 2006 9:56 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I think it is time for some levity in this discussion. For those of us old enough to remember before the Reagan presidency, there was a joke about the Soviet Union.

A Westerner was talking with a Muscovite in a Moscow bar. The Soviet kept praising the Communist system and the Westerner was trying to understand.

“So, if you had two houses, you would give me one?”
“Yes,” answered the Soviet.

“If you had two cars, you would give me one?”
“Yes.”

“If you had two shirts, you would give me one?”
“No.”

“Why not?”
“Because I have two shirts.”

The updated version:

A candidate for office walks into a bar and meets up with several people of a Drinking Liberally group. The candidate could not believe the generosity of the liberals and kept asking questions.

“So, you have two houses and want to give me one?”
“Yes.”

“You have two cars and want to give me one?”
“Yes”

“You have two jobs and want to give me one?”
“No.”

“Why not?”
“Because I need the two jobs to pay the loans on the first house and car.”

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» My wife is Russian... Posted by: may261989
» RE: Here's my favorite Posted by: Plexius
Evil: YES!
Posted by: PeaceLove on Nov 18, 2006 10:28 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Absolutely correct. The credit industry, especially the credit card industry, is evil. They deliberately conspire to encourage people to become buried in debt, then they charge usurious rates to their credit prisoners. That's how they make their obscene profits.

Please don't pretend otherwise. The credit industry's predatory practices will only be acceptable for as long as people accept them. Open your eyes, call evil where you see it, and demand change from you elected representatives (good luck with that).

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: vil: YES! Posted by: MAD
» LMAO! Posted by: Scientz
» RE: Evil: YES! Posted by: CB in MN
Illuminati
Posted by: mite on Nov 18, 2006 10:36 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Well everyone's comments covered it, unlike the article but thats understandable.
All I can add is; do we start changing it? Are we willing to march upon Washington D.C.? Are we willing to take the steps to help the people of District of Columbia to become represented like the rest of the states, with the same protections by the Constitution and Bill of Rights.
The key to changing these acts of treason by these Bankers and Congress Persons is: Executive Order 11110 (Kennedy vs Feds) close down the Federal Reserve Bank-IRS and enforce Article I Sec: 8 (Congress Coins Money).
We need to stop using our credit (debt) behavior and force Congress to coin currency not debt.
watch: America- Freedom to Facism By Arron Russo
read: The Creature From Jekyll Island by G. Edward Griffin
www.givemeliberty.org

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Illuminati Posted by: yellow
» RE: Illuminati Posted by: mite
» RE: Illuminati Posted by: mite
» RE: Illuminati Posted by: yellow
Socialism?
Posted by: Landbaron on Nov 18, 2006 11:19 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Under capitalism, the proceeds of labor go to the profits of the wealthy few. With socialism, production is planned to meet human needs. The capitalists use every difference in society, including sex, ethnicity, language, sexual orientation, age, and physical abilities to divide workers in order to depress wages, maintain a surplus labor pool, and prevent working-class unity. SO YOU CAN'T WIN! Live a life of depravation of the things you don't need if you don' like debt. It's a rich man's world, sorry.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Socialism? Posted by: Daniel Shays
» RE: Socialism? Posted by: Landbaron
» RE: Socialism? Posted by: AdamG
» RE: Socialism? Posted by: richviss
» RE: Socialism? Posted by: Landbaron
» RE: Socialism? Posted by: Landbaron
Debt Avoidance
Posted by: b4upoo on Nov 18, 2006 11:26 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Many rental apartments will not rent to lawyers. The reason why is that lawyers know how to avoid paying bills. There are even some states which shelter debtors while other states favor lenders.
It has reached the point that each person needs to understand how to manipulate the system and avoid debts while staying within the law. Sadly many people are unable to learn debt avoidance or payment avoidance. We see these types of people filing phony accident cases in the courts. They have learned to pay their debts by suing every few years.
Florida is a good state to live if you have debt problems. Debt enforcement in unlikely here. Any sum that is part of your home is protected as OJ Simpson well knows. One can own a multi-million dollar home in Florida without any fear at all. Also annuities can not be touched in Florida. So any money coming your way can be pumped into an annuity and you may use it when you wish. As they can't touch your home or your annuity they have no choice but to bargain with you over your debt. For example if you owe a credit card company $5,000 they may well be more than willing to accept $500. as payment in full once it becomes obvious that you are running the show.
Frankly those who are social rebels need to be in debt as part of a protest against an obviously wrong headed system. The trick is to learn to be in debt in such a way that you gain from it rather than lose your last dime.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Debt Avoidance Posted by: CB in MN
» RE: Debt Avoidance Posted by: sapamm
Government wouldn't have it any other way
Posted by: symcokid on Nov 18, 2006 11:38 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
In my 64 years old and I've never known any other way except to be debt ridden, as far as I know that's how this government remains self perpetuating. It matters not how much they take in tax dollars, they've always got more than that allocated for some worthy project. If they can keep each of us in debt up to our ass, then they have all of us under their control. I'm afraid it's going to be even worse for young people nowadays - nothing is affordable.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Destroying Debt Stops Unearnt "Profit" Stealing Societie's "Wealth"
Posted by: even(nik) on Nov 18, 2006 12:55 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
You want to stop unearnt profit concentrating your societies real wealth and power into fewer and fewer corrupt hands, thus letting the system of democracy function for it's peoples and environments common welfare?
You might be interested in Major C.H Douglas' "social credit" economic theory, (the same thinking was good enough for Jesus when he threw the money lenders out of the temple)

"If Douglas's proposals were adopted, this monopoly right to create financial credit would be taken from the banks and vested in the State as representing the community. And the credit, which the State was thus empowered to create would be used — for what? — to enable goods to be sold at less than cost. It would thus be used to cancel the third item which, we have seen, goes to determine the minimum price, that is, the capital charges. In other words his proposals would have the effect of breaking up the huge masses of capital which have been accumulating since the beginning of the industrial era. There would thus be a destruction of capital accompanied by a new creation of purchase-money."

".. But few, if any, other authors have explained that as productivity increases year after year, who benefits from that increased productivity is determined essentially by money and banking policy. Specifically, Douglas explains (particularly in Part 2, Chapter 2) that, if the money supply is not increased, dollars/pounds become more valuable, such that prices drop. But, if the money supply is increased just enough, the value of each dollar/pound - hence prices - can be left unchanged. Finding it desirable to keep prices unchanged in this way, Douglas then explains that, essentially, a decision has to be made about who gets the additional dollars/pounds. Under our current fractional reserve system, the banks do, by creating and lending out extra credit. Under a "social credit" system, the extra dollars would be divided up and given to all citizens in equal portions as a "dividend". His rationale: that increases in productivity - resulting as they do from innovation and technological advancement over time - are a "cultural heritage" that belongs not to banks but to all members of society. His message is clear: the citizenry are prevented from benefitting from their own cultural heritage, and this leaves them increasingly indebted to banks, and unable to reduce, over time, the portion of their lives that they spend working and simply trying to survive. Under social credit, Douglas foresees a decrease in work and an increase in leisure or, at least, the opportunity to work less if one so chooses.."

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Excuses, Excuses . . .
Posted by: MAD on Nov 18, 2006 1:21 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Once again Alternet readers have come up with some interesting theories explaining the predicament in which America's "junior consumers" currently find themselves.

"It must be the credit card companies. Yes that's it. The Federal Reserve is another problem. They flood the nation's banks with cheap liquidity who in turn pass it along to defenseless borrowers. It must be their fault. No, it's Fanny Mae and Freddie Mac - yeah, yeah they're the real problem."

These are all entertaining excuses but they fail to justify your enormous personal debts. Here's a thought:

Maybe it's "keeping up with the Joneses" or trading in your '04 Toyota because you're not a complete person unless you're driving the '07 model. How many American women max-out their credit cards in order to get a pair of 34 D's or lipo? I've known several American men who put $250 (each) tires on their Acuras, install tail-pipes that shoot fire out the rear and top it off with a stereo/DVD player; heaven forbid they actually pay attention to the road while driving! I see a society that idolizes vacuous people who buy diamond necklaces and Gucci bags for their poodles. I am dumbstruck each and every time I see one of those diamond commercials that shamelessly implies you're less than a real man if you don't spend 3 months salary on a fucking rock for your little precious! How many of you live in a house that you have absolutely no business financing? How many of you drive a Volvo on a 35K salary? How many of your friends rushed out and spent $600 on a PlayStation 3. How many of you shot someone to be the first to own one? LOL!

The worst part is that America has bought into the "conspicuous consumer school of personal improvement" doctrine hook, line and sinker! Stop blaming everyone else for your problems. Stop being ignorant sheep who do everything that Hollywood tells you to do. Oh, there's another one - Hollywood. Of course it must be their fault! Why don't you take some responsibility for yourselves? Nobody made you buy that 400K house and 65K car. Nobody put a gun to your head and made you put that Cancun vacation on your credit card. Spring breakers - I'm talking to you. The only possible justification you have for debt is paying for college but that still doesn't explain away your spending habits. Your decadent, sick culture is to blame and those many weak minds are a symptom.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: xcuses, Excuses . . . Posted by: Scientz
» I drive a Volvo Posted by: owleyes
» RE: I drive a Volvo Posted by: symcokid
» A little bit of perspective Posted by: cmysticism
» RE: Amazed!!!!!! Posted by: The Butcher
» RE: xcuses, Excuses . . . Posted by: DaBear
Medical Expenses Also
Posted by: sofla100 on Nov 18, 2006 2:03 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
To an earlier poster, Florida use to be a good state for filing bankruptcy for debtors but that was wiped out with new federal legislation. But, what needs to be also said is that 50% of those filing bankruptcy have been filing due to Medical expenses. So, it is not only credit cards, but medical expenses as well that are very problematic for many Americans. The problem of course is Americas lack of universal health care. And, the doctors and hospitals all charge more to the uninsured. Essentially, debt has become the modern equivalent of slavery. So, what is next for the banks to lobby for, a return to debtors prison?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Medical Expenses Also Posted by: Mr. Heathen
» RE: Medical Expenses Also Posted by: Landbaron
» RE: Medical Expenses Also Posted by: DaBear
» RE: Medical Expenses Also Posted by: Landbaron
If you've come this far..
Posted by: Kludin on Nov 18, 2006 2:29 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Then go just a little further. Check out this article by Dmitry Orlov.

You may or may not agree with the article's premise (of looming economic collapse in the US, triggered by the peaking of oil supplies), but the article has lots of excellent advice for young people starting to think about attending college and starting a career. It is already tough out there even if economic conditions don't worsen significantly.

I wish I had this kind of advice when I was starting out. Fortunately for me, after college I was able to pay off my debts and actually save some money (only possible because I still rent rather own a house, and stayed single until recently).

In spite of having a white collar job straight out of college, I put off buying a car - took the bus to work for the first year or so (sure people looked at me funny, but who cares...), and when I finally bought a car it was a tiny, used (7-year-old) Toyota. Even then I needed a small loan because I had zero savings - most of my money went towards paying down my credit card debt. Now almost 10 years later I can look back and breathe a sigh of relief. I still remember the sleepless nights and extreme anxiety due to being in debt.

I think young people in their teens and 20's have it a lot harder today - college tuition has skyrocketed, and housing and living costs are far outpacing any increase in wages. I doubt I'd make it through if I was entering college now.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: If you've come this far.. Posted by: off-the-radar 2
Ending Debt
Posted by: ssmit355 on Nov 18, 2006 3:49 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Many of the postings I read are abstracted or third person, but few folks speak personally, about their life experiences. Maybe most who have time to write here or read this are already rich (but don't know it) and cannot qualify as poor. I qualify as poor in bankruptcy law.

I consider myself not-rich. Richness implies many things that y'all suggest, in your writings, hurt the world. In other words, to be Rich, I might need to participate in such things as environment degradation, stretching the gap betwixt the rich & poor, and plain old racist, sexist, classist, speciesist, assininism (a new word unknown by Webster). But who knows. (Really, who knows?...)

Although it took almost one year to prepare, yesterday I filed for bankruptcy. My wife and I will eliminate $50,000 in consumer credit by the year's end (if all goes as planned). We keep our condo mortgage and school loans (Sallie Mae got in bed with Uncle Sam, so her loans are unforgivable). What a relief. Shwew! But it took some delightful strategy; I cut back my hours at work over the last year, and my wife changed jobs (she reduced mid-year income dramatically). We pushed our income down by spending more time together, more time with friends, and more time wandering in beautiful mountains. Our income reduced, but our enjoyment of life improved.

Try it. Each state owns specific guidelines for bankruptcy: but in my experience all poor people qualify. The new bankruptcy laws make it tough for the Rich-Enough-To-Pretend-To-Be-Poor people. So if you don't qualify then you work too much for too little, or you might qualify as a whiner. Or I suppose you could be participating in the too-greedy complex that America soaks in, and by doing so, perhaps you lack in other ways that produce statistically appealing dollar signs for Giant Corporations of America. In any case, the upper income bracket for individuals and couples in my state are above the income-tax bracket for Poor. I'm not-rich, but I'm not-poor.

Here I guess I'm cryptic; let me be direct. Bankruptcy is easy for a couple making less than 45,000/year in Utah, especially if your debt is "unsecure, non-priority" status (like hospital bills or credit cards).

My weird guess about easy limits is that Congress is so out of touch that they lack concepts of what living under 30 or 40K is like, so they made it pretty easy for this level of bankruptcy (they tripled the cost--it cost me almost $2000 --it used to be $400-500). For those making Congress type wages, they made it tougher (so it seems to me, but I didn't really experience this) with loads of paperwork. If you know for real why Congress did this, tell me; a better reason will fuel my tales of bankruptcy with truth rather than speculations.

In our family's attempt to be more responsible we: 1) shift our burden of debt back on the credit card goliaths and hospital behemoths that attempted to hork our financial lives, and 2) we only use cash. I recommend a book called "Die Broke" for the not-rich financial savvy folks reading this. It's great strategies for living in today's corrupt, filthy economy of lying politics. And it feels real, it feels good, and it feels honest.

Relax. Chill out. Love those around you. Drop your house of credit cards. (What about my credit rating?!) There are some things I won't need anymore. (But credit ratings get back to normal, I've been told, in a mere 2-3 years with normal consumer spending habits.) So while my credit rating will not be great this year or next, my time, my integrity, and my life gets and is great.

PS There's a bucket of Religious Worms in the shame surrounding bankruptcy, but that's another story. And it's a fine challege for you and you and me to put our money (not credit) where our mouth is by speaking honestly and truly around people we know--not just here in cyberspace.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: nding Debt Posted by: richviss
» RE: nding Debt Posted by: MAD
» RE: nding Debt Posted by: ssmit355
» RE: nding Debt Posted by: MAD
» RE: nding Debt Posted by: ssmit355
» RE: nding Debt Posted by: MAD
» RE: nding Debt Posted by: yellow
» Last one here Posted by: ssmit355
» RE: nding Debt Posted by: Landbaron
» RE: nding Debt Posted by: jaby
» RE: nding Debt Posted by: yellow
Blaming the Victim in the National Security State
Posted by: sofla100 on Nov 18, 2006 5:33 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Bankruptcy law is now based on the median income of the state you live in. If NY or California it is going to be much higher then say Utah or Tennessee. If you have a household income of say $41K in Florida, you would not be eligible for straight write-offs. In Miami, where average housing runs over $2