Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Ollie North Returns to Nicaragua

By Greg Grandin, AlterNet. Posted November 18, 2006.


With the election of former Sandanista leader Daniel Ortega as president, Nicaragua shows its refusal genuflect to Washington's commands, and that makes Cold Warriors like Ollie North furious.

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

More stories by Greg Grandin

Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

The electoral wave that battered Republicans last week rolled well beyond Ohio and Arizona, traveling as far south as Nicaragua, where voters rejected intense U.S. pressure and elected Daniel Ortega president. This was Ortega's third attempt to regain the office since stepping down in 1990, after a decade in power as the head of the revolutionary Sandinista government. And even as George W. Bush was stumping for his candidates in the heartland, Oliver North was traveling down to Managua to urge Nicaraguans to vote for anyone but Ortega.

The ex-Marine colonel told Nicaraguans that they had "suffered enough from the influence of outsiders" -- a remark meant to criticize Hugo Chávez's support for Ortega but that some, considering North's role in running the covert operation that illegally funded the anti-Sandinista Contras in the 1980s, must have mistaken for a confession. In addition to North, Bush's Ambassador to Nicaragua, Paul Trivelli, threatened that the United States could cut off aid, while congressional Republicans warned that they would pass legislation prohibiting Nicaraguans living in the United States from sending remittances home if Nicaraguans voted the wrong way.

Over the last couple of weeks, with polls predicting that an Ortega win seemed likely, conservative blogs, think tanks, and policy intellectuals whipped themselves up into a near-frenzy at the thought of a Sandinista comeback. The National Review breathlessly warned that a triumphant Ortega would bring the threat of nuclear or biological terrorism to "within walking distance of our undefended border." Over at the Washington Post, the American Enterprise Institute's Roger Noriega predicted that an Ortega victory would push Nicaragua "toward the abyss."

But Ortega is a changed man from the revolutionary who for more than a decade withstood a Washington-backed assault of intense ferocity. He has declared himself a free-trade Christian, and just before the vote joined forces with the Catholic Church to back an anti-abortion law that is more punitive than anything James Dobson's Focus on the Family hopes to pass here in the United States.

The reason for such hysteria cannot be explained by what Ortega may or may not do once in office, but rather by the dissonance his victory creates deep in the recesses of the neocon psyche.

Central America, particularly Nicaragua, played a key role in the formation of the world view of our foreign-policy hawks. As diplomatic historian Andrew Bacevich points out, in "neoconservative lore, 1980 stands out not only as a year of crisis but as the year when the nation decisively turned things around." When considering this turnaround, most casual observers usually point to the fall of the Soviet Union and the liberation of Eastern Europe. Neocons, though, have a complicated relationship to those two events, coming about as they did not through confrontational militarism but negotiation and patience. Just a few years ago, when pressed by the Republican chair of the House Armed Services Committee to admit that Bush's Iraq policy was similar to Ronald Reagan's in Europe, Wesley Clark had to remind his interrogator that "Reagan never invaded Eastern Europe." In fact, Reagan, in sharp contrast to his rhetorical escalation of the Cold War and his increase in defense spending, followed a course of restraint in most foreign policy arenas, so much so that by 1986 his conservative base had taken to calling him the Soviet Union's "useful idiot" for negotiating arms reductions with Mikhail Gorbachev.

There was, however, one area where the administration's rhetoric did match its actions, and that was Central America. The United States spent billions of dollars, and trained and inflamed anti-communist allies that killed hundreds of thousands of civilians.


Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: neocons, nicaragua, ortega, oliver north

Greg Grandin teaches Latin American history at New York University and is the author of a number of books, including the just published "Empire's Workshop: Latin America, the United States, and the Rise of the New Imperialism."

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Nicaragua
Posted by: yellow on Nov 18, 2006 12:37 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I remember the Sandinista revolution in 1979. I recall late in that year an Military uniform clad Jaime Wheelock, the new Minister of Agrarian Reform speaking through an interpreter in a small room in the Sterling Building of the UW-Madison campus (yes! the same one they blew up in 1970 to protest the Vietnam War) about the early achievements of the Revolution and what was to come in the near future. The Nicaraguan Agrarian reform was laudable. A substantial amount of land owned by the Somozas and their croneys was expropriated and kept in tact to keep the efficiency of scale economies in the agro-export sector while raising the wages of the laborers on those latifundia. A social wage was further provided in terms of health care, education and literacy, and clean upgraded housing for all landless rural families. The land deficient received more land while the rich lost some but were left more or less in tact. The mass expropriations of land and industry and nationalization that took place in Cuba under Castro didn't happen in Nicaragua. The political moderate/extremist dichotomy which both the Carter and Reagan Administrations pushed were misleading and only set up acceptance in the US of a policy of regime change in that country. The reforms were not given a proper chance and at first opportunity, Reagan mined the small country's harbors and began a proxy war against the new revolution which needlessly cost thousands of lives and destroyed much of what Nicaragua's poor struggled for years to achieve. Boycotts of what was in fact a mixed economy created a self fulfilling prophesy of revolutionary failure. Nicaragua still paid off much of Somoza's odius debt and accomplished some economic growth even in the midst of an incipient world recession! By 1982, the contra war was in full swing and it was hard to continue to be a plural democratic mixed economy. The US feared the example of a successful armed revolution in its own backyard more than anything the Sandinistas actually did in terms of policy. The Soviets had NO influence and neither did anyone else. It was a purely Nicaraguan Revolution. The European Community and the Organization of American States had more to do with support for the Revolution than any communist powers. The Nicaraguan People rebelled against years of oppression, corruption, poverty, and exploitation. Like El Salvador, Nicaragua in the late 1970s had the worst distribution of wealth in all Central America with the top 5% of the population controlling over three-quarters of the national wealth. The middle classes were small and had little chance against the Somocista cleptocracy. The country remained poor and stagnant. But cracker America was in no mood to listen to such explainations in 1980 after the Iran Crisis. For over two and one half decades we have been a nation on a war footing. The results have been deplorable. There will never be a real change in US foreign policy until the American people take the time to get a clue and finally scream a resounding NO to imperialism!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

North should be in prison and his assets forfeited to Nicaragua for his many crimes against them
Posted by: LeftWright on Nov 18, 2006 12:38 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Oliver North has no business going to Nicaragua (or anywhere in Latin America) and saying anything other than "I was wrong, please forgive me, what can I do to make amends"

North's activities during the 1980's inflicted great suffering on an impoverished Nicaragua and all of Central America. He directly assisted in the murder of thousands and the destruction of the Nicaraguan economy.

Oliver North is a war criminal and should be serving a life sentence in Leavenworth.

I would hope that the Nicaraguans and all other countries would arrest him on sight and send him to the ICC to be tried.

Any story including North should call for his arrest. He is an absolute disgrace to the USA and the human race.

grrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr

There are very few people that make me really angry, ignorant Ollie is one.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» No peace and love? Posted by: famouspipeliner
» Mr. North is scum! Posted by: vangogh69
mad
Posted by: rsaxto on Nov 18, 2006 2:15 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I hope that North gets so mad that he dies from his own gratuitous stupidity and criminality. Hundreds of thousands of civilians killed in Iraq and hundreds of thousands of civilians killed in Nicaragua. How many hundreds of thousands of civilians does North want to kill this time?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: mad Posted by: edith
» RE: mad Posted by: rsaxto
Hooray For The Sandinistas!
Posted by: Tom Degan on Nov 18, 2006 4:35 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Did Oliver North have a detail of bodyguards with him when he went down to Nicaragua? I sure as hell hope so. The dirty old bastard is damn lucky that he wasn't shot on sight. There are quite a few Nicaraguans with LONG memories and those aren't happy memories, if you know what I mean.

Ronald Reagan should have been impeached for what he did to the people of Nicaragua alone. Ronnie even stupidly compared the murderers and rapists who comprised the Contras to our Founding Fathers - can you believe that?? We tend to forget how mind-numbingly stupid Ronald Reagan was. Given the intellectual capacity of the current resident of 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue, that's understandable. George W. Bush makes Reagan, dumb as he was, look like Einstein.

I'm happy that Daniel Ortega and his fellow countrymen are standing up and saying, in unison, "Fuck you, George! Fuck you, America! This is OUR country! Get used to the idea! This is the way WE choose to live! Deal with it"!

Good for them!

Tom Degan
Goshen, NY
"The Rant" by Tom Degan

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Dirt in Nicaragua
Posted by: edith on Nov 18, 2006 5:56 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Daniel Ortega and Oliver North. Two gravediggers who never take a bath. And I thought I'd never have to smell either one ever again.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Reagan
Posted by: srjenkins on Nov 18, 2006 6:06 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Reagan might not have invaded countries with U.S. military forces, but he did start the first "War on Terror" that funded quite a few para-military groups - including Bin Ladin - and encouraged states like Iraq to engage in conflict, like the Iraq-Iran war.

The long term effects of these policies basically created much of the environment we have today. Just as Bush's policies in Iraq and around the world will still be haunting the world decades from now.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Gippervasion Posted by: edith
yin and yang
Posted by: dikaiosyne on Nov 18, 2006 6:55 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Don't get too excited there lefties. Nicaragua going left once again isn't all that big a deal. Give Ortega a few years of ruling and the folks in that country will go right once more. You know everthing operates on a cycle and embracing commie doctrine on a regular basis is what they do in the turd world. As for Ollie. A great American hero who should be held up as a modern "John Wayne" to your "chillen". Then again your chillen probably are probably testosterone deficient and incapable of anything but doing drugs, weird gay sex and mouthing banal platitudes about global warming.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: yin and yang Posted by: surfreality
» RE: yin and yang Posted by: raiteri
» Hey, Dikaiosyne! Posted by: aonghus36
» RE: Hey, Dikaiosyne! Posted by: dikaiosyne
» RE: yin and yang Posted by: pepaw
» RE: yin and yang Posted by: edbeaumont
» RE: yin and yang Posted by: powdermonkey
» RE: yin and yang Posted by: Jaycubed
» Conservasaurus resurrected? Posted by: may261989
» RE: Conservasaurus resurrected? Posted by: kogwonton
» RE: yin and yang Posted by: kogwonton
» RE: yin and yang Posted by: coalbanks
cromulant
Posted by: gtash on Nov 18, 2006 7:10 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I think the yin-yang perspective is a good one. I mean , Ortega's rise even as NeoCons flounder in their own self-righteousness is appropriate. Ollie North is and was no hero. He spent most of his testosterone on Fawn Hall. Ortega may or may not be the "same" as 30 yrs ago, and may be no threat at all if his nation's political mix restrains him--the way democracies ought to. Lessons from Ollie North are not required unless of course you want to present an object lesson in hypocrisy.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

ossie
Posted by: ossie on Nov 18, 2006 8:16 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The Right wing nut jobs,call Socialism for the poor a ''failed concept'' ''unworable''and BLA BLAThan turn around and spend Billions $$ of Social money in an effort to make it fail.If it's a ''failed'' system Why not stand back and let it fail on it's own??

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Excellent point. Posted by: WhatNow?
LHol
Posted by: LHol on Nov 18, 2006 11:09 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Regardless of how the news comes to us in the US, this country is not solely responsible for either the collapse of the Soviet Union nor the defeat of Daniel Ortega in 1990. While our foreign policy played a role in both cases, the destinies of both countries were affected by the decisions of their own citizens, along with other influences beyond US policy.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Contra redux Posted by: edith
Why bother?
Posted by: waynels on Nov 18, 2006 4:09 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
An old joke but: look-up "has-been" and there's Olie's picture. Why spend any time or words on a fool like him??

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Sure.... I believe you......
Posted by: dikaiosyne on Nov 18, 2006 4:41 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
About the only thing you wrote that was half way believable is that the Republican Party is a joke. I'm a registered independent myself who tends to vote conservative. As for your testosterone laden friends....more likely they all meet at the bathhouse for a little "fun" after getting all sweaty. Living in the great NW I'm skeptical that you're a lifelong Repub so please don't push that canard. Even should I be in error its likely that you're a RINO Republican.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

insane
Posted by: karyse on Nov 19, 2006 6:13 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The only thing that has kept the world "safe" (so far) from being blown into smithereens is that the U.S. is equivalent to a beloved and respected family member who has slowly gone insane. It takes time for the siblings to believe, and in the interim all manner of nutty behavior recieves an attempt at a rational explanation. It can take years to finally admit that there is no cure and that the crazy sibling must be put into an asylum for the greater good.

It is left to those who are not insane (in this metaphor, other countries), to exersize restraint in responding to crazy behavior. The rest of the world, it seems, is finally recognizing that there is something seriously wrong with the U.S. psyche and is beginning the steps to isolate us from the rest of the world -- to put us into an asylum, as it were. When our committment is accomplished, if we are very lucky, they will take pity on us.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Ollie North & the Marines.
Posted by: Jaycubed on Nov 19, 2006 12:12 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
At the time, the Marines were quite upset that Ollie was not turned over to them for prosecution as he was considered a disgrace to the Corps. It is quite possible that he would have ended up against a wall as a traitor if the Marines had had their way.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

bandz
Posted by: bandz on Nov 19, 2006 12:37 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Ollie North claims that he helped bring democracy to Nicaragua? That's quite a stretch for the man who, using illegal means, worked hard to bring about the military overthrow of a democratically elected government. Typical of North's twisted thinking! How ironic that the president he helped overthrow is now returned to that office by another democratic election. Amazing that North still is at large -- he's a liar, coward and traitor. (A liar by his own admission during the Iran-Contra scandal, a coward because he weaseled his way out of the prison term he deserved afraid to face the consequences of his illegal actions, and a traitor because he subverted the Constitution he'd sworn an oath to uphold.)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

bandz
Posted by: bandz on Nov 19, 2006 12:37 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Ollie North claims that he helped bring democracy to Nicaragua? That's quite a stretch for the man who, using illegal means, worked hard to bring about the military overthrow of a democratically elected government. Typical of North's twisted thinking! How ironic that the president he helped overthrow is now returned to that office by another democratic election. Amazing that North still is at large -- he's a liar, coward and traitor. (A liar by his own admission during the Iran-Contra scandal, a coward because he weaseled his way out of the prison term he deserved afraid to face the consequences of his illegal actions, and a traitor because he subverted the Constitution he'd sworn an oath to uphold.)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

buh
Posted by: buh on Nov 19, 2006 1:51 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
On the TV special "Cover-Up - Behind Iran-Contra", it was revealed that freedom fighting Ollie wanted to round up all of us "dissidents" in the U.S. when Reagan invaded Nicauragua. The Constitution was to be suspended for this "war of survival", as he painted it when addressing Congress. What angers me now is when I hear someone say "our greatest President, Ronald Reagan", when there is only one who approaches his corruption, lying, and seeming disdain for common Americans. Okay, the other one has surpassed him, but I don't long for the "good old days" of the 80's. I long to see something no living American has yet to see, an administration truly accountable to it's citizens.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: buh Posted by: rwa
» No fan of Reagan here either Posted by: may261989
» RE: buh Posted by: yellow
The Long Winds Of Change
Posted by: hole11 on Nov 21, 2006 5:46 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This author puts me to sleep. I am not sure who won the cold war or if it even existed. Reagan looks great on paper but if you saw him in person you would think the elderly woke from their graves to elect him. Can you imagine the president saying he didn't remember what happened a year ago? Lie sure but not remember, might as well been sleep walking. And he defeated who? I don't remember the marines leaving Lebanon without their tails between their legs. Then what? Afghanistan?

But wait we have Nicaragua. Hmmm, I heard all the lies and that we needed a missle defense sheild (star wars). But then we get El Salvador death squads and Iran-conta. Wow.

Wait this is about Oliver North returning to Nicaragua and how they don't bow to Washington. Well, they are poor. They got a new Catholic church courtesy of the Domino's Pizza founder. All is well I guess.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Sandinista redux or a Tony Blair/new Labour makeover?
Posted by: coalbanks on Dec 1, 2006 7:44 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Ortega may soon be seen as more of a Tony Blair/New Labour style leader than the old Sandinista Red that scared Reagan et al a few decades ago. Don't look for anything as radical as the old policies or anything more radically left than Tony Blair, never mind Chavez or Castro. As for Ollie North's claims to have defended democracy... Well, crazy is the nicest label I can come up with.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]