Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Political Firebrands From Decades Past Still Burn Hot

By Anneli Rufus, AlterNet. Posted November 11, 2006.


From Gore Vidal to former Black Panther Flores Forbes, we rely on our golden-age dissidents to write the most stinging critiques of American society.
111106story
Political Firebrands from Decades Past Still Burn Hot

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

More stories by Anneli Rufus

Get AlterNet in
your mailbox!

 
Advertisement

Gore Vidal's third novel, in which two buff dudes do it under a "lovely dark sky," then tumble "back on the blanket" and do it again, came out in 1948. Vidal was only 23. The City and the Pillar was the English-speaking world's first mainstream book to conjure vivid man-to-man sex without damning anyone to hell. It is virtually impossible to grok now how new that was then.

Nearly 60 years and as many books later, Vidal was one of the first famous Americans to start calling the Bush administration a junta.

His knee is titanium. His skin sags. He ran for Congress in 1960 and the Senate in 1982, against Jerry Brown -- long before many now buying Vidal's new anti-war books were born. After burying his longtime companion in 2003, he left the villa near Naples where his house guests had included Greta Garbo, Rudolf Nureyev and Hillary Clinton. He moved into a Hollywood Hills house he had bought in 1977 but planned never to inhabit before "the Cedars-Sinai years" -- Cedars-Sinai is a nearby hospital. Call him hostile. Call him radical. Call him anti-social and controversial, as critics have. He couldn't care less.

"Controversial? I can't say that I have ever had much interest in what I've been called," Vidal tells me now. "What others think is their business, not mine. What I mostly do is examine contradictions in public discourse. This sometimes causes distress, but 'the unexamined life is not worth living,' as Plato says Socrates said. ... Now that we are post-Runnymede," he tells me, invoking the Greeks and the Romans and the Magna Carta, what frightens him most in America is "the loss of habeas corpus."

Call him gay and he will tell you it's a "nonexistent category." Call him old and you'll get no argument.

This is the year of new memoirs by old radicals. Vidal's elegiac "Point to Point Navigation" (Random House, 2006) is like a long electifying seance, conjuring a string of departed souls the author once knew in politics and the arts, from Fellini to Capote to JFK. Flores A. Forbes remembers busy days arming Black Panther Party firing squads in "Will You Die With Me?" (Atria, 2006). Progressive art critic Robert Hughes dishes on '60s icons in "Things I Didn't Know" (Knopf, 2006). Sixties rocker David Crosby's "Since Then" (Putnam, 2006) is subtitled "How I Survived Everything and Lived to Tell About It." He writes about his environmentalism, his civil rights and anti-war work. The first photo shows him with an upraised fist.

You know what they say about hindsight.

Growing up in the '60s or '70s, it was impossible to imagine anyone being cool and old. "Don't trust anyone over 30" wasn't a joke. The Who sang, "Hope I die before I get old." Only Keith Moon did, so does that make the other guys hypocrites?

We have reached an era in which firebrands wear Depends.

If these authors are tribal elders dispensing lore around campfires -- if these memoirs are the Iliads of shaky-handed, age-spotted bards -- then what do they say? How do the old gods and creation myths hold up?

A bit bent. Bruised. In some cases flayed. Gazing way back, these authors now write neither in the heat of youthful passion nor even at the middle-aged putative peak of their powers. They appear unwilling to candy-coat. Maintaining their principles, and aware that in this Information Age countless Sherlocks are fervently winnowing truths from lies, these authors cast the past in such a pure unfiltered light as to make us flinch. Because heroes in that light appear only human. Because some hopes and dreams never came true. Because we realize that history repeats itself, that ideas and ideals we prize as avant-garde, as our own inventions, really aren't.

Writhing under their own gaze, these authors wonder what was worth what. "I'm quite literally a case of arrested development," David Crosby confesses. "I don't think I grew much." Flores Forbes remembers how terrified he was to realize, at 20, that as "part of the Black Panther Party's best and brightest ... I would more than likely die as a Panther or go to jail for life or disappear as a fugitive never to be heard from again. ... One way or another, I was doomed." Wounded during a botched hit on a prosecution witness, Forbes -- whose comrade-in-arms and best friend died that night -- spent eight years in jail.


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: gore vidal, flores forbes, richard hughes, david crosby

Anneli Rufus is the author of several books, including "Party of One: The Loners' Manifesto."

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
best
Posted by: rsaxto on Nov 11, 2006 1:06 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As a 76 year old I feel the best thing about being old is that one can believe in reality instead of bullshit created by greedy brainwashed fools. Vidal is a gem and gems can live forever and worry only about being smashed by an asteroid.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

A great article
Posted by: mat38 on Nov 11, 2006 4:55 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I enjoyed reading this article. In particular, Gore Vidal has been one of my favorite reality based persons for years. I only began reading all of his stuff ten years ago even though I've been around for a while. I first him when I read Lincoln. His depicition of the feeling in DC as Lincoln was elected and the description of Lincoln arriving in DC to claim the throne really hooked me.
Good to know someone can put these people together in a way that says I told you so without really saying you're also an idiot for not listening. Now if the MSM can wake the hell up we can get back to peace and hope and put the BUSH MAFIA in jail where they belong.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: A great article Posted by: ReallyBearish
THe RIght has its echo chamber rock stars (coulter); the fakeLeft has IT'S echochamber rockstars
Posted by: mah_favorite_flavor_cherry_red on Nov 11, 2006 5:21 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
such as vidal.

Each side has filtered up to the top THOUGHT LEADERS who will do the overclass bidding. And get rich while doing so....

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» fakeleft & rightwing echochamber thought leaders make big $$$$ Posted by: mah_favorite_flavor_cherry_red
DISHONEST SOCIETY
Posted by: mdruss42 on Nov 11, 2006 5:46 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What actually happens as we get older is we finally accumulate enough experience and knowledge, or some of us do, to realize we lived a good bit of our lives in a fog because of the absolutely and completely dishonest society we live in.

I was over 50 when I said in a group of my family that I felt absolutely like a case of arrested developement as it took me this long to realize that everything I had been taught by teachers, mother, and church was either blatant lies or based on wrong assumptions. This was taken as an insuly to our mother even when I explained that she was as much a product of the dishonesty in our society as I, and I was not in the business of apportioning blame.

I say this to say that we spend the majority of our lives learning enough to be able to live in a reasonable fashion then we are too old for it to matter. Is this stupid or what?

We send children to schools designed to arrest their developement then whine and moan on a regular basis about Johnny not being able to read. Well the schools work better at arresting developement on some than on others. Every ten years or so, I have watched a big show about improving our schools, most of the measures make them worse. I have never heard a real honest discussion about how you make children dumber than they were when they entered school, i. e. they are immune to learning anything but sports, celebrity, or shopping. I have heard, from family who are among the religious right, that this is the fault of the teachers union, but I have found that when you are looking for the policies that make things, whether it be schools, families, or governments, run as they do, you look at the ultimate power, i.e. the top, not the floor sweeper. In the case of schools, follow the money.

You would think it basic that only a well informed voting public is capable of running a republic or any type of representative government.....and maybe it is.....but certainly not to the voting public. Hell, most of the voting public cannot connect the dots of education and knowledge and government and quality of life.

WHO IS TO BLAME? WHY! THE VICTIMS OF THIS CHARADE, OF COURSE!

And that is correct, we have been willing victims, taking the crumbs from the tables of the super rich and the corporations and living in the richest country the world has ever known without health care, or even the sure knowledge that one of the driving forces for humans to band together is not so they can create great wealth for a few, but that they, by working together and pooling resources, can create a better life for everyone.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Amusing ourselves to death Posted by: HeroesAll
» RE: Amusing ourselves to death Posted by: mdruss42
What a load of mainstream media
Posted by: Edward Abboud on Nov 11, 2006 5:55 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The reason we have the same old 'firebrands' is because mainstream media, and the faux media, refuse to allow the real new voices to be heard. That's why we wind up having to listen to Bob Dylan again: media says, " dissent? Oh yeah, we can do dissent. Pull out these old farts; they did dissent"

I don't buy your ridiculous article. We DON'T want to listen to those old has-beens; we're stuck with them because they have tentacles into main and faux media, and you keep pretenting we're interested in them and their almost dead rhetoric.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Thank You for This Article
Posted by: R.I.P. on Nov 11, 2006 6:16 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"Nor can you blame them for being cynical. Live long enough and sooner or later you will fall afoul of the very folks whose torch you once bore, or their disciples, that is, latter-day versions of yourself".
SPOT ON..... a fine job. Rip Tragle

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

do we really need nancy pelosi??????
Posted by: mdruss42 on Nov 11, 2006 6:58 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
In the 72 hours since she has taken the mantle of the next Speaker of the House, Nancy Pelosi repeated her pledge that “impeachment is off the table.” In her victory press conference, she didn’t speak of the need to repeal the Military Commissions Act of 2006 that revoked habeas corpus and legalized torture. She didn’t decry the unending death and destruction that is daily terrorizing the people of Iraq. She did not pledge to stand firmly against the new war being prepared against Iran. Nor did she make a peep about defending women’s right to abortion and gay rights – even as Roe V. Wade is under increasing threat and gay marriage bans passed in an additional seven states.

Instead, she recast this election as a mandate on manners and effectiveness: "The American people spoke out for a return to civility to the Capitol in Washington and how Congress conducts its work…And Democrats pledge civility and bipartisanship in the conduct of the work here, and we pledge partnerships with the Republicans in Congress and the president, not partisanship."

WERE YOU ALL UPSET ABOUT MANNERS AND BIPARTISINSHIP ? I WAS NOT....BUT WHAT ABOUT THESE LITTLE MATTERS........

WHY IN HELL WOULD YOU RUBBERSTAMP A COOKIE CUTTER RUMSFIELD TO REPLACE RUMSFIELD....ISN´T THAT TAKING EVEN BIPARTISINSHIP A BIT FAR?

TO SAY NOTHING OF......

IRAQ.....DEAD AND WOUNDED CHILDREN...OURS
IRAQ......AT LEAST 1,000,000 DEAD AND WOUNDED
IRAQ......$400,000,000...OUR CHILDREN´S FUTURE

PATROIT ACT..DISGUSTING USE OF THE LANGUAGE..REVERSE IT....WE LIKE OUR RIGHTS

TORTURE LAW...TOO AWFUL FOR WORDS...MAKES US ASHAMED BEFORE OUR FELLOW MAN. HABEAS CORPUS IS NON-NEGOTIONAL....GET IT BACK OR GO YOURSELVES.

CORPORATIONS ARE NOT PEOPLE!!!!

YOU ARE A WOMAN....WHY NOT ONE PEEP ABOUT ACTS OF TERRORISM AGAINST WOMEN´S CLINICS? WHY ARE YOU NOT REAFFIRMING A WOMAN´S RIGHT TO GOVERN HER OWN BODY?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Contempt Breeds Polarization Posted by: Douglas
» RE: Polarization breeds contempt Posted by: blitzmesser
» 1. Strategy 2. Patience Posted by: andyc
wisdom
Posted by: robmikejas on Nov 11, 2006 7:13 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I do believe we need these voices of the old as part of our societal discourse. The voice of experience carries a certain validity not to be found in most of the writing and thinking of the youth of today.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Message to the wing nuts who try to think too much
Posted by: mat38 on Nov 11, 2006 7:40 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
How in the world can you compare a highly respsected and accomplished academian and literary intellectual like ann Coulter to the balderdash foul mouthed gutter brain Gore Vidal is beyond comprehension. To even suggest they are polar opposites proves that you are nuts.
It's obvious that Ann Coulter has been revered for decades and is one of our nations most accomplished literary historians and also a most well read human treasure, whether you like it or not, and that Gore Vidal was concieved on a dirty sweat, booze and semen soaked barroom floor and reared in some backwoods lower class outhouse and hangs out with the likes of Bills O'Reilly and Mahar and sluts his way through life by lying and swearing at people who really care about America above their own petty populist bookselling interests.
Yeah, the LEFT has its priorities mixed up for sure.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Implicit critique: where are the new firebrands?
Posted by: medstudgeek on Nov 11, 2006 8:01 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'm happy to see the old getting respect (especially on the Left, which is supposed to be anti-tradition), but doesn't this sort of raise the question of where the next generation of lefties is coming from? There seem to be plenty of young people voting Democrat these days...I wonder what will happen to them?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» same as the old boss Posted by: edith
Noam Chomsky
Posted by: aonghus36 on Nov 11, 2006 10:47 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What about Noam? Is he considered a sixties radical, or is he more modern times? I know he was a leading opponent of the Viet Nam War. For info on him; http://www.chomsky.info/index.htm

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Noam Chomsky Posted by: mdruss42
» RE: Noam Chomsky Posted by: rwa
David Crosby -- A 1960s Voice for Peace and Justice
Posted by: Douglas on Nov 11, 2006 11:27 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Although anti-war progressives have recently paid much attention to Bob Dylan and his 1960 protest and anti-war songs, the progressive and anti-war efforts of other rock and pop stars from that period continue to be forgotten and ignored. David Crosby is best remember for his late 60s recordings with Stephen Stills, Graham Nash and Neil Young (although he was a member of and performed with and/or influenced numerous rock groups). The Crosby/Stills/Nash 1969 hit song "Wooden Ships" was especially popular with the student peace movement at the time (Crosby also recorded the song with the Jefferson Airplane and I remember college students at the time debating over which of the two versions of the song was best, Crosby's original or the one with the Airplane). Other now generally forgotten pop/rock performers and groups from this period who recorded great protest and anti-war stuff include: Country Joe MacDonald and the Fish, Jefferson Airplane, Grateful Dead, Melanie, Quicksilver Messenger Service, Steppenwulf, some of Credence Clearwater Revival and many more. Great stuff! I enjoyed reading about Crosby and, of course, the great Gore Vidal. An excellent piece.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Good to be reminded that the US has not always been butt kissers to "the establishment"
Posted by: Sojourner on Nov 11, 2006 11:47 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It's good to be old, when you can see that what you did and stood for 50 years ago was the right thing to do and stand for--even while it did not succeed. What succeeds is only the same old "go along to get along" horse manure.

That's because every new generation needs to be taught anew. That's the indisputable ground reason for public education. Unfortunately, when the teachers have not themselves learned a damned thing from growing older, the new generation writes the kind of crap that one can find from some in this thread.

The worst part of growing old is to see what you've outgrown fawned over and touted as if it were really *original.* How many more times do fools need to discover Ayn Rand? Or Scientology? Or visions of empire? Or stories where the plot hangs on a device like a dream? Or a photographer's trick?

"Just as it ever was," David Byrne tells us. Bless the truly original for keeping living worthwhile--even for us old.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

O Lord, the usual suspects again . . .
Posted by: Moonray on Nov 11, 2006 1:00 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Please spare us any more discussion of that 1960s artsy-fartsy crowd. I lived through the so-called cultural revolution of the '60s. Most of it took place in affluent neighborhoods in the nation's major cities, especially New York and Los Angeles. Most Americans wondered what all the fuss was about and went on about their business.

Sure enough, after the media hype died down, most of the more famous "revolutionaries" and "flower children" stopped living off their parents' credit cards and found jobs on Wall Street and in other pursuits where knowing the right people counts more than integrity, intelligence or hard work. They became the very Establishment they had despised, or pretended to despise.

If you want to salute a real principled relic of that era, drink a toast to George McGovern, the courageous and idealistic senator who was battling corrupt politicans before most of us were born. Of course, the American people soundly rejected McGovern, choosing instead to believe the comforting lies of Richard Nixon and his evil cronies. You see, not much has changed in 35 years.

McGovern is still speaking truth to power, demanding that U.S. troops be brought home from Iraq by next summer. Of course, he will be ignored again and most Americans will choose comforting lies again. They never learn.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

It's time for a new Novel and a New Poem
Posted by: drricklippin on Nov 11, 2006 6:47 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
While they both Sinclair's "The Jungle" and Ginberg's "Howl" ignited major social movements we need a single new novel and a new single poem around which US vox populi can rally now.

This does not diminish the extraordinary contributions of Vidal et al noted in this piece

Maybe AlterNet readers have some nominations?

Dr. Rick Lippin
Southampton, Pa

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Maybe nonfiction? Posted by: medstudgeek
» RE: Maybe nonfiction?MAYBE-THANKS :) Posted by: drricklippin
A lack of integrity
Posted by: Torgo on Nov 11, 2006 10:03 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Seale made good on his election-day strategy to "give every person who signs up to vote for our program a free bag of groceries, a free pair of shoes and a free sickle-cell anemia examination." But if the other side did this, would it be bribery?

Reading these books might make us squirm, because not only the authors' perspectives are at stake. Ours are too. To reconcile hating guns with admiring the Panthers, for instance, entails tying yourself into one heck of a pretzel.


Ditto for the US liberal "humanitarian bombers" of "oppressive" Serbia who gave Clinton a pass in 1999 and who then protested Bush's alleged "humanitarian war" to end "oppression" of the Iraqis by Saddam. It's precisely this sort of mental and moral incoherence that drove me away from The Left in a big way. I neither respect nor trust people whose thoughts, words, and actions are contradictory, and I sure as hell won't fund their causes. To quote Bob Dylan, "I'm not that eager to make a mistake...People are crazy and times are strange/I'm locked in tight, I'm out of range/I used to care, but things have changed"

That's too bad, because now that I'm out of school I'm in a better financial position to express myself alone or in collaboration with those who share my values and interests. BTW, I don't "hate guns" but I do value self-reliance and self-defense so I invested in a shotgun instead of donating to Alternet or the Democratic Party. I'm not interested in putting food on the table of those who advocate high taxes (taking food off of MY table) to fund elective wars on behalf of distant strangers.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: A lack of integrity Posted by: HeroesAll
» RE: A lack of integrity Posted by: BillC
Maybe it is because they feel guilty for giving us the cynical, unprincipled world we live in
Posted by: Bobsays on Nov 12, 2006 12:43 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I think it is less that they are the only sages on the block, than that they are going into the long dark night knowing all the idealism and fairy tales they told have turned sour and rank. Multiculturalism is more on the street a darwinian struggle of the races; women's lib has destroyed the family and motherhood; greed and money have supplanted communities, values and honour.

Germaine Greer's pussy pics have evolved into a batty old lady who makes less and less sense as the days go by.

They clearly had a ball in the 60s, but as Austin Powers once said: 'If I can have unlimited sex with whomever I wish in a consequence-free environment, then I am sound as a pound!'. AIDs is ripping through the developing world like a freight train, drug taking fuels enormous gang cartels, rock and roll is just cynical business, fashion is all paedophiles and bitchy queens.

Nice legacy comrades!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Do You Want To Know Why America is a Mess?
Posted by: R.I.P. on Nov 12, 2006 6:31 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Try this experiment: Try NOT to read the headline and DON'T READ THE TEXT. Flatten out all the comments and read them from bottom to top. Then see if you can figgure out what the article was about..... without becoming ill and giving up half-way through the "comments" cheers, Rip Tragle

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Anneli Misses Vidal's Doubt of 9/11 Fairytale
Posted by: rwa on Nov 12, 2006 11:25 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
David Montoute:

If scrutiny of this netherworld is off limits to mainstream news, traditional 'alternative’ media has been no less averse to dealing with it. To illustrate, an inestimable contribution to our early understanding of the events of 9/11/01 was made by Canadian economist Michel Chossudovsky in his exposés of CIA-ISI-Taliban collusion. M.I.T. professor Noam Chomsky had previously written a forward to one of Chossudovsky’s books and yet "America’s leading dissident" acted for months as if the findings of Chossudovsky and others simply didn’t exist. When finally asked point-blank about their implications, Chomsky deemed the idea of US complicity "hopelessly implausible" and not even worthy of discussion. Speaking of the US anti-war movement’s ongoing partisan support of the pro-war Democratic Party, activist Charles Shaw sees such positions as "part of a larger pattern of "regulated resistance", a system by which dissent is carefully managed and constrained by self, overt, or covert censorship; denial-based-psychology; fear of personal or professional criticism and reprisal; and pressure from powers above including elected officials and those establishment foundations which flood millions into the not-for-profit activist sector."

Though Chomsky is famed for his Propaganda Model of the mass media, a demonstration of how corporate ownership dramatically influences content, he is also a resolute anti-conspiracist. In Chomsky’s world, Lee Oswald alone murdered President Kennedy, Saddam Hussein 'misunderstood’ the US position on Kuwait in 1990 and Osama bin Laden broke ties with his patrons following the Soviet defeat in Afghanistan. Even as Hollywood stars speak openly on CNN about self-inflicted US terrorism, Chomsky and his colleagues have not deviated from their stance. For them, it is axiomatic of the current conflict that a) there is an entity known as 'Al Qaeda’, international in scope and pursuing its own goals independent of US policy, b) said entity was responsible for the attacks of 9/11/01, and c) there exists a consequent 'War on Terror’ which, whilst it may be exploited for ulterior motives, stems from legitimate security concerns. Exhaustive investigations, sometimes even by mainstream sources have shown the complete emptiness of these propositions.

The Chomskyite Left’s connivance in the corporate media’s whitewash of problematic events, and worse, its unremitting hostility to alternative interpretations, led researcher Bob Feldman to investigate the sources of 'alternative’ media’s funding. His discoveries revealed a complex financial trail originating with huge establishment foundations. The Ford Foundation, the National Endowment for Democracy and the Trilateral Commission, George Soros and many others, were found to be generously sustaining allegedly 'alternative’ media in the US. When aspects of independent 9/11 research threatened to penetrate mainstream awareness in 2002, these media cliques signed on to a savage attack of key figures in the 9/11 Truth Movement. But this gatekeeper Left was not able to suffocate 9/11 questions except by amputating a part of their erstwhile collaborators and alienating much of its audience. Professor Chossudovsky’s work would simply be ignored. Further confirmation of the gatekeepers’ entrenched interests is the fact that increasing public awareness and acceptance of a 9/11 'inside job’ has not influenced the gatekeepers’ coverage in the slightest. From recent firings at (Rockefeller-funded) Pacifica Radio, to Counterpunch’s excommunication of 'conspiracy nut’ Kurt Nimmo, the line has been clearly drawn: 'responsible’ critique on one side, 'conspiracy theory’ on the other.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Anneli Misses Vidal's Doubt of 9/11 Fairytale -2
Posted by: rwa on Nov 12, 2006 11:28 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Slipping under the radar at Counterpunch, Anis Shivani ascribed a more benign motive to the Left’s rejection of 'conspiracy’ findings, seeing it as an effort to preserve its rationalist credentials. But since this meant giving a pass for the enabling event of the current war, it was, Shivani observed, a losing move. The gatekeepers’ response to the Truth Movement’s has been to emphasize a flawed "structural analysis" of society, one that would diminish the importance of individual conspiracies. The value of structural analysis, as applied to the media, is that it allows us to identify news corporations as part of the overall edifice of power, rather than merely another social actor. Ironically, when structural analysis is applied to Establishment Left media, the latter are revealed to be scarcely less compromised than The New York Times or CNN. But ultimately, any analysis that ignores the truly determinative structures in today’s world, i.e. the powerful financial dynasties that unleash wars and destabilization, make or break governments at will, is of little use.

It goes without saying that all of the limits to dialogue with the Left gatekeepers are multiplied many times over when dealing with the corporate media. Here self-interest is a bigger factor, since a career in mass media is at once more lucrative and provides a much higher personal profile in the world. The mass media is additionally insulated from 'Deep Politics’ by decades of depoliticisation and marginalization of non-mainstream ideas. Ideas that are plausible to independent researchers frequently sound like delirious ravings to mainstream journalists.

Robert Fisk is exemplary in this regard. The UK Independent’s fearless correspondent has justifiably earned a widespread respect and admiration for his on the spot, critical coverage of today’s most terrible conflicts. Fisk, however, has poured scorn on the 'childish conspiracy theories’ of remote-controlled aircraft, endorsed by many Arabs. Of course, our correspondent doesn’t share his own theories, so we do not learn exactly how amateur pilots could steer planes wildly off-course and enter the world’s most exclusive no-fly zones without opposition and without incident. But since this is how an Administration of proven liars describes the events in question, what else remains but to believe it? And yet, it must be remembered that Fisk represents the outer limits of tolerable dissent in the corporate media.

From the true origins of the Gulf War to the pre-planned dismemberment of Yugoslavia and Iraq, from Wall Street money laundering to the murder of David Kelly, from depleted uranium to 'false flag’ terrorism, there is now an open-ended list of taboo subjects that the mainstream media and the foundation-funded 'alternatives’ cannot address. The limits of Herman and Chomsky’s Propaganda Model are clear. The most serious distortions of today’s world lie not in the 'spin’ given to events, but in the very 'reality’ of those events. Nor can assassinations, such as that of Rafik Hariri, be automatically assigned to the "obvious" culprit.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The default liberal gun position
Posted by: pomes on Nov 15, 2006 11:49 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Reading these books might make us squirm, because not only the authors' perspectives are at stake. Ours are too. To reconcile hating guns with admiring the Panthers, for instance, entails tying yourself into one heck of a pretzel.

I couldn't disagree more. I think the default liberal position in favor of gun control and taking guns out of people's hands is very dangerous.

I don't have to reconcile anything, I ADMIRE the Black Panther position of "arm yourself." They recognized in the black community a greater truism: the poor, disadvantaged, and disenfranchised are the ones who MOST need to worry about arming themselves, because they are the ones whose problems are most ignored by society and are most at risk to be victimized by authority, police, and politicians.

With Ann Coulter openly talking about executing a few liberals to shut them up, with a fan base who admires her position, with martial law looming just around the corner, it is DEFINITELY time for liberals to get over their hang-ups about guns. Don't get a wolf to guard your hen-house. Guard it yourself.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]