Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Karl Rove Re-Aligned

By Andrew Gumbel, Huffington Post. Posted November 9, 2006.


Karl Rove's dream of ushering in a generation of Republican rule is officially dead. What now?

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

More stories by Andrew Gumbel

Get AlterNet in
your mailbox!

 
Advertisement

Bye bye, Turd Blossom. Karl Rove's dream of refashioning the American political landscape and ushering in a generation of Republican rule is officially dead. The radical Republican revolution, which began with Barry Goldwater, hit paydirt with Ronald Reagan and reached its highwater mark with the 1994 Contract With America, has come to a screeching halt, and it's largely the fault of George W's consigliere.

Make no mistake: when Rove was good, he was very, very good. He understood exactly how to manipulate, divide and intimidate the electorate so he could eke out the narrowest of winning margins -- the 50 per cent plus one model, which was as much as the radical Republican policy agenda was ever going to muster. But divisiveness will only take you so far. Politics is, above all, the art of coalition building. Without the Rehnquist Supreme Court, without a supine Democratic Party in opposition and, above all, without 9/11, he would never have made it even this far.

When Rove was first gearing Bush up for the White House, his model was the 1896 election that ushered in 30 years of Republican dominance at the federal level, smashed the Populist movement that might otherwise have formed the basis of a European-style party of labor, and slowly refashioned the Republicans themselves into the party of big business and deregulation, not the more inclusive values of its Lincolnian origins.

Rove was certainly right to see divisiveness as a major part of the 1896 watershed. The country was literally split into two, with the segregationist Democrats asserting one-party rule in the old confederate South and the Republicans taking control just about everywhere else. His mistake, though, was to identify too closely with Mark Hanna, the Ohio business entrepreneur who guided William McKinley to the presidency. Hanna may have been a unfettered free-market Republican, but McKinley was not. This was, in fact, the onset of the Progressive Era, which started under McKinley, flourished under Teddy Roosevelt and continued until America's entry into World War One. When the more conservative, Hanna-friendly wing of the party took over in the 1920s, it spelled the beginning of the end, culiminating in the Wall Street Crash and the Great Depression.

Under Rove, the Republicans have compressed the 30-year arc of a century ago into a scant six years. And now the party's over. The Democrats may still be unsure what they stand for, but in terms of campaign strategy they have successfully played catch-up. Howard Dean's controversial 50-state approach - modelled in part on the grassroots legwork the Republicans started in the 1960s and 1970s - made it possible for Democrats to seize the initiative even in states like Arkansas, Kentucky and Wyoming where, for the past four years, they were largely absent. Having been burned by state ballot initiatives on gay marriage and abortion in 2004, which drew the Republican faithful to the polls, the Democrats fought back this time with initiatives of their own on stem cell research and the minimum wage.

The Republicans themselves, meanwhile, are quickly understanding that the only way to recover from the drubbing they've just received is to move back to the center, and fast. Arnold Schwarzenegger has already figured that out -- ditching the hard-right rhetoric that led him to humiliation in last year's special election in California and making common cause with the Democrats on everything from global warming to new infrastructure bonds. The Governator was rewarded for his bipartisanship with a landslide re-election victory - making him the happiest Republican in America this week by quite some distance. Schwarzenegger, never one to suffer an excess of modesty, has even ditched the GOP red white and blue colors for a softer green and orange. Consensus and coalition-building is his new watchword. If the Republican have any sense, they'll follow Arnold's lead.

Digg!

See more stories tagged with: karl rove, progressives, elections, bush, election06

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
In a word: resignation
Posted by: thoughtcriminal on Nov 9, 2006 12:38 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
THe only downside to that possibility is that Bush would be left without a brain - but maybe he could use Condi Rice's? Wait - didn't Nixon resign before he could be impeached? Now there's an idea; we could even have an early national election for a new president. That's how we got Arnold here in California...on second thought, maybe that's not such a good idea.

If Bush and Cheney wanted to take a two-year vacation, to Crawford or wherever, where they can clear brush and shoot quail to their heart's content - I'm sure noone would really mind.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Are you high? Can I have some? Posted by: thoughtcriminal
» RE: In a word: resignation Posted by: Benjaminsjw
When democrats won
Posted by: swissliberal on Nov 9, 2006 1:03 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
then as well because the rebublicans let it happen.
To hold the senate would have been simple with 3 very tight races (think Ohio 2004). But they knew 1. that the damage of the appearance of democracy would be hefty, and 2. that their chance to win the presidency 08 would be smaller. The whole structural advantages of the Reps will continue. If the Dems would not have won now it would have been a good time for ending business. So let's praise this relatively clean and fair elections ;).

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

resign
Posted by: rsaxto on Nov 9, 2006 3:27 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The Rumsfeld resignation has gone well. Nobody got mad at anyone when he resigned and nobody asked for any "secret" information. Maybe all the major Bushies should resign and that way nobody would have to rat on anybody. Wait for Pelosi to get sworn in, though, so we could have a decent President to replace Bush. Keep your damn secrets and move to South America. Avoid a war crimes trial and don't kill any more Iraqis/Americans. Do the right thing for a change.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: resign Posted by: kellysgarden
» RE: resign Posted by: profecita
» RE: resign Posted by: willymack
He is not dead yet
Posted by: CTunionguy on Nov 9, 2006 3:38 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The one thing that Rove and his ilk have shown is that they can be badly wounded and come back. Now is not the time to write them off as beaten. Now is the time to consolidate the gains the Dems have made with the independents, and remember that you do not win for good in a political process that repeats every two years, you only momentarily gain advantage. Pragmatism and cynicism will defeat idealism and ideology every time, if given the opportunity. If the Dems want to move their agenda, consolidate their gains and expand their base of your voters, they must take care to create an agenda that resonates with all the voters.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: He is not dead yet Posted by: willymack
» well said Posted by: orwellwasn'tdreaming
Send Rove your math book
Posted by: Bic Pentameter on Nov 9, 2006 4:36 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Rove recently said to an NPR journalist "you've got your math, I've got THE math." I say we send him our old math books. Anybody got one called The New Math?

When your issues won't hold do, it's easier to pander to the basest instincts of the electorate - witch hunt, commie threat, drug crazed youth (in a prior time, the drug crazed negro). They even pandered to those who think God is punishing us for allowing abortions and gays. I don't see how it would un-american to let this guy have a sampling of opinion from beyond the pollsters.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Send Rove your math book Posted by: kbiteye
Do Something Congress
Posted by: drdrdrr on Nov 9, 2006 4:36 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I agree that Arnold Schwarzenegger is leading Republicans towards the center, but disagree with your assertion that the election failure is "largely the fault of George W's consigliere."

The problems with the elected Republican establishment became so apparent to Americans in 2005-2006 that not even Karl Rove could save them this time.

In this election, the American people vented their anger towards the "do nothing" Congress, which proved itself to be more concerned with retaining Republican power than doing what is right, morally and constitutionally. As we saw leading up to the election, the opinion of Congress as a whole was terribly low, polling consistently lower than for George W. Bush.

A CBS News article in May 2006 stated..."The overall approval of Congress' performance has diminished vastly since 2001; only 23% approve now while 67% did in 2001. This figure reflects frustration over Congress' ability to challenge the President since 67% think Congress does not question his policies enough."

The 2006 mid term election was nationalized because:
- The Republican Congress failed in its constitutional duty to provide active oversight over the policies and activities of the executive branch, especially regarding the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq.
- The Republican Congress did not challenge the Bush administration to correct US strategy in Iraq; it effectively allowed the situation to grow more and more dire, with the lives of American troops hanging in the balance.


The Foley debacle was a vivid microcosm of Republican Congressional leadership seriously off base. When asked "Which concerned the House Republican leadership more?" respondents to a poll in early October said:
- Safety of the teenage Congressional pages (10%)
- Leadership's own political standing (79%)
- Both equal (2%)

On Nov. 7th, America voted to resuscitate Congress and to reassert its vital constitutional role (separation of powers; checks and balances), and in doing so, gain leverage over the administration's Iraq policy.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» I tend to agree Posted by: turbocrusher
It's a day to celebrate, but...
Posted by: LeslieGem on Nov 9, 2006 5:06 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It's a little early to say that Karl Rove's strategy is dead and Republican dominance is over. People didn't vote democratic because they liked the platform of the democratic party -- they voted democratic because of the mess in Iraq. The dem's have 2 years to sell their platform or we are going to be right back where we started -- with the Repub's.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Good luck, America
Posted by: shangrilalad on Nov 9, 2006 5:17 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
“WASHINGTON (AP) — Almost 79 million people voted in Tuesday's election, with Democrats drawing more support than Republicans for the first time in a midterm election since 1990.
The overall turnout rate, reflecting a percentage of voting age population, was 40.4 percent, compared with 39.7 percent in 2002, according to an Associated Press vote count and an analysis by American University's Center for the Study of the American Electorate.”

20 plus % of eligible American voters, confronted with a power mad president and the most corrupt congress in my lifetime had enough sense to throw a monkey wrench into the Rabid Right’s machinery of world domination. 19% of eligible American voters were so content with the Bush regime, they voted to stay the course. An illegal, immoral and insane war of aggression didn’t shake their faith in conservative ideology one bit.

60% of eligible voters didn’t even bother to vote.

The good news is, our quasi-democratic state has survived another year of relentless attack from the Rabid Right. The bad news is, our country has moved so far to the right, if the world was flat, we’d standing with our left foot on earth and our right foot dangling in space.

Good luck, America.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Good luck, America Posted by: dale0k
» foot dangling in space? Posted by: Iconoclast421
» Well Said.... Posted by: CatDad
ng
Posted by: ng1944 on Nov 9, 2006 5:27 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What is now?????
You should know that criminal is always a criminal.
Now is hot time for another
September 11.
As long as this guy is not behind bars,
nothing changed.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Turd blossom gone? nahhh
Posted by: dale0k on Nov 9, 2006 5:30 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I don't think Rove is finished. He is a behind-the-scenes architect, out of reach of the whims of the electorate, and will have much to say about shaping republican fortunes.

Unless he voluntarily retires, or he is ignored or whacked by party heavyweights. But who, where are they? Obviously Bush (Rove) has run roughshod over everyone. Who would stand up for a new direction? Will McCain drop the hammer?

They have been following Rove's lead for too long. He was not only Bush's brain, but he subsumed the whole party strategy, and much of American policy.

Unless they can grow a new brain fast, the republicans will continue their campaign, the Rove strategy, of building the base, and doing whatever it takes - subterfuge, dirty tricks, wedge issues.

He will do his best to throw wrenches into the democratic machinations. You can count on that.

The dems will still look over there shoulder and wince when accused of "obstructing" and "playing politics" or "being weak" or being "radical," or whatever.

As the turd might say - You can have your brain, but he has "the" Brain.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

ROVE GOT TOO MUCH CREDIT
Posted by: VZEQICVA on Nov 9, 2006 6:28 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Karl Rove carved out his own reputation and made it just what he wanted it to be. I seriously doubt that he's brilliant. There was no opposition worth mentioning. And so people chose to believe that he was a genius. No one had the courage to make him look bad on the countless occasions when he was dead wrong. The entire administration sold fear to the people and they believed anything and everything they were told. Let's not forget that! Thanks, ANNA

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Rove IS finished
Posted by: charlief on Nov 9, 2006 6:38 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Rove staked his reputation on these mid-term elections. He had no choice. After grandstanding about winning both houses in such a petulent, childish way on NPR and elsewhere. He staked all.... and lost all. He's proved himself to be fallible - but he failed in such a spectacular fashion, that he's now out in the cold.

It's clear that right up to poll's eve he'd given Bush the nod that both houses were secured. Witness Bush's rampant rhetoric in his last campaign speech in - where was it - Minnesota? And witness the stumbling, crest-fallen Bush during his pubic announcement yesterday.

Isn't it a little ironic that the two prosletysers for the Republican ascendancy - Cheney and Rove - have effectively disappeared from sight? No comments from either, in fact I'd hazard a guess that Cheney deliberately 'went hunting' as a fall back plan should something go wrong.

Now the Senate has also fallen to the Dems, he's effectively had his balls cut off.

With Pelosi speaker of the house, she has the power of subpoena... which, IF she plays her cards right, gives her and the Dems in the House enormous bargaining clout. She gets compliance from the White House... or threatens subpoena action - which is surely going to force Bush/Cheny cabal to the negotiating table.

What choice do they have now?

No, this is the finish of Rove as the preeminent political operator. He left Bush - the Emperor - with no clothes. And politicians, like elephants, never forget.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: ove IS finished Posted by: Sparks56
The End of the Rove
Posted by: Tom Degan on Nov 9, 2006 6:56 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Be not mistaken, gentle people! Karl Rove's best days are long behind him. Watch in glee as his world comes a'crumbling down all around him. Like George W. Bush, there is a federal prison cell in Karl's future with his name on it. It has been said that the 2006 mid-term election is the beginning of the end of the Bush presidency. WRONG! It's over. It's all over.

Rove's arrogance has been symtomatic of this disgusting administration. His very presence in the White House is also informative. If politics means nothing to the First Fool, as he always claims, then why is Rove working in the White House? Why is he so important to this administration? What other qualifications does he have to work in the executive mansion? Why are the taxpayers even paying his salary? He is a political advisor. There are Constitutional questions involved here, no question about it.

When I was a child, I knew a kid who used to cheat at everything. He was also a liar, spoiled rotten and as mean as hell. No one ever said that that kid was a genius - no one with straight face, anyway. He used to get away with everything. And the more he got away with, the bolder he became. One day, his luck ran out. The person I'm referring to just recently finished a five-year stint in prison in upstate New York. Today he is a little more humble. Let's make damn sure that Karl Rove is humbled.

Tom Degan
Goshen, NY
"The Rant" by Tom Degan

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: The End of the Rove Posted by: Sparks56
That is not dead which can eternal lie
Posted by: Swatopluk on Nov 9, 2006 7:01 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We will have to wait some strange eons before the Rove model will die (or pull us all down with its final triumph).
Wait for a full scale "stab-in-the-back" scam concerning the failure in Iraq just for starters.
Cheney has already made clear that he will simply ignore subpoenas issued by the Dems.
As a notorious predictor of doom I expect that the GOP will use the temporary Dem triumph to prepare for the retaking of congress and keeping the White House in 2008.
And they will make lots of hay when the next SCOTUS vacation comes, Bush proposes Elisabeth Bathory or Hannibal Lecter as "moderates" and the Dems (and some sane Repubs) say no (=> obstructionism smear)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

No only not gone but planning for `08
Posted by: SteveO on Nov 9, 2006 7:02 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I suspect the people who found the dufas POTUS are already grooming their next big thing. Rove will be actively involved with "Swift Boating" McCain again in `08 so that this yet-to-be-identified neocon will have the opportunity to go up against (God forbid) Hillary Clinton.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Sue
Posted by: sueepa on Nov 9, 2006 11:19 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
My hope is that Mr. Rove's connections with Delay Inc. will be thoroughly investigated by the welcomed new majority--God be with them!

A cursory perusal of the Abramoff emails listed on the House's Committee on v. Reform http://reform.house.gov, cf. Feb. 25th email from Jack Abramoff re: Rove meeting, causes great concern--note from Abramoff requesting weigh-in with Jeb Bush and his "anti-cruising" stance..just 3 weeks after the tragic murder of Gus Boulis of Sun Cruz Casino.

Delay Inc. should all be jailed for their version of conservatism which in essence is egalitarianism at its worst--neath the guise of self-righteous conservativism. In their warped view, the end justifies all means--the end being wealth & power for the very few. Conservativism for these mountebanks is merely a malleable ploy they used to milk their targets.

Delay, Rove, Norquist, Reed, Abramoff, Pombo, Hayworth, Burns, Dolittle and other shareholders of this corrupt corporation deserve their own wing at a federal prison. It is a shame (for them) that with the loss of their majority, the likelihood of getting an earmark to build the same is slim at this juncture. Oh well, they never foresaw that the same civil rights usurped from other Americans would not serve them well while serving in stripes.

There is a God, and when one mocks God through false words & deeds to the level of crass arrogance, God shall humble, the first shall be last and the last first.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Walking Turtle
Posted by: Walking_Turtle on Nov 9, 2006 11:37 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Thoughtcriminal writes, "If Bush and Cheney wanted to take a two-year vacation, to Crawford or wherever, where they can clear brush and shoot quail to their heart's content - I'm sure noone would really mind." Then willymack writes, "In any event, turdblossom and the Evil One should be hounded off Capital Hill, never to return. I'd prefer to see them in prison, but an ignominius exit would suffice." Um, now let's put the pieces together. Yup, Crawford's a fine "holding pen" for those two birds. And "Minus Dickus" the Torturemonger too. Also Rummy. Ditto Gonzo, Yoo, et al. The whole reckless, feckless, cowardly, lyin' krue. Interpol can find 'em there once the German court's Universal Jurisdiction investigation into all their war crimes reaches its inevitable and just conclusion. Fact is, it looks like Angela Merkel's outrage at Condi's finessing the US definition of torture in her (A.M's) face a couple of years back just might bear some sweet fruit for us American People left standing. The proceedings are said to be scheduled for late November - right in time for the American Thanksgiving Holiday. Once the facts are formally found, the charges can indeed be brought forth. In the meantime, them boyz sure can just go have a DP/TP gonzo-pornfest with each other and have a big strokin' hoot in their brittle little reality-bubble for as long as it takes the German Court. (Hey, the US did the same thing when Yugoslavian top-guns tried the same trick with their own version of the Military Comnmissilns Act!) "Ol' Sureshot" Cheney can just go quail hunting with just anyone he wants, too. Fewer warm bodies for the Interpol boys to wrestle to the ground at arrest-time, I reckon, all said and done. But that's bad for the Rule of Law. Cheney needs his own super-securitized dark-cell in the basement of the Hague, really, just for full accountability's preservation. (Look out, boys - that one bites.) Let us be truly grateful as we continue to pray for peace, even though there are no postage stamps bearing that most noble human sentiment to be had in all the land. (Design yer own and use Stamps-dot-com if ever one can, is all.)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The Problem With Rove Is Machiavellian
Posted by: johnolywa on Nov 9, 2006 12:17 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Just because Machiavelli is famous does not make him a good political strategist, much less a ruler. No accident that Machiavelli was advisor to a prince who bought a cardinal-ship at age 16, who was then made commander of the Pope's armies, a time of great polarization, and wholesale disregard of the line between church & state, a time of the Spanish Inquisition.
Lao Tzu pegged it exactly, 500 years before Christ: those who operate the way Rove does may appear to "win" for a time, but will always lose in the end.
So, Karl, while you are on unemployment, read less Machiavelli, and more Lao Tzu.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Lose Lose Situation
Posted by: tashi on Nov 9, 2006 1:18 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Already the DINOs that run the Dem party are talking about governing from the center. Which means there won't be any thorough investigations into the fiasco in Iraq, nor any investigations into the pre-war intelligence.
In the name of mutual cooperation, Dems will play soft with Humpty Dumpty Georgie.
As the old guard from Humpty Dumpty's father try to put him back together, Dems will forget about the last six years and move on. Just so that Clinton, Biden etc have a shot at the 08 presidency.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Pombo bombed OUT !!!!
Posted by: susten88 on Nov 9, 2006 2:24 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The arch enemy of all environmental causes got his Waterloo and lost the election in California. I hope we never see the likes of him anymore !!! He was among the most corrupt politicians in Washington and received $500'000 from Abramoff.
GOOD RIDDANCE !!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Pombo bombed OUT !!!! Posted by: sueepa
Someone should keep an eye on him
Posted by: bookwoman on Nov 10, 2006 8:24 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Just as he sneaked onto the American political scene, Karl Rove can't be dismissed now. Someone should keep an eye on him because I can't believe he won't try to make a comeback.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Shoot quail or lawyers .
Posted by: bookwoman on Nov 10, 2006 8:25 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Don't forget the score - Quail a bizillion - Lawyers one.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Learn from Rove: Tell the Story
Posted by: jhbeck23 on Nov 10, 2006 5:32 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Already, almost unnoticed, Rove-ism renews itself when President Bush calls on the Democrats to be bipartisan. Matt Taibi only recently detailed how the GOP had been excluding the minority from anything. Dems no doubt didn't want to complain for fear of looking like the 90-lb weaklings.

But Bush makes this point now not to be nice, but to pre-empt the truth-telling that needs to come about GOP abuse of governmental processes. Dems need to restore integrity in government generally, but must also tell the story!

TELL THE STORY -- FIRST, LAST, CONSTANTLY!

Rove proved that falsehoods can drive out truth simply by dominating how the story is told. Because a majority of Americans can't believe that their "leaders" would boldly, calculatedly, repeatedly LIE to them.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Democrats unsure of what they stand for?
Posted by: maizie on Nov 11, 2006 6:11 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"The Democrats may still be unsure what they stand for.."

I am so tired of hearing everyone in the media repeat this lie. Name me one Democrat who doesn't know what he or she stands for. If they didn't know, they wouldn't call themselves Democrats. They just don't feel the need to feed their insecurities by imposing their views on anyone with a pulse. Ask a Democrat what he or she stands for and you'll get a good answer. Until then, most of us are polite enough to keep our mouths shut and realize that just because someone expresses an opinion, we don't have to counter it. It's just an opinion, not a threat.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Did anyone notice Karl Rove's last vacation?
Posted by: Ellie1 on Nov 12, 2006 2:01 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Ten days in the Dominican Republic with a group of buddies and a pocket full of Viagra. AAAHHHH, the Dominion Republic, where child prostitutes are available. Maybe Foley wasn't the only one??????

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Karl Rove no more, ever and anywhere!!
Posted by: 1984NOW!!! on Nov 12, 2006 7:02 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We didn't stifle a brain, we stifled a criminal, a thief of ethics,
real morals and decency. Karl Rove has alwas looked like the Pillsbury dough-boy to me, now he is cooked.

I REVEL IN THE WHOLE DEMISE OF THIS CABAL OF AN ADMINISTRATION, BUT LONG LIVE THE USA. DECENCY PREVAILS AND SO DOES THE CONTITUTION!! CELEBRATE, CELEBRATE, LISTEN TO THE MUSIC!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]