Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

When Strategy Fails, Rove Will Fight Dirty

By Larisa Alexandrovna, AlterNet. Posted November 3, 2006.


Karl Rove is not a brilliant strategist. And what he lack in brains he makes up for with dirty tactics -- distorting the numbers, running smear campaigns, and creating diversions.
43798story

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

More stories by Larisa Alexandrovna

Get AlterNet in
your mailbox!

 
Advertisement

Let us begin in the middle -- that is, at the center of a chess board, the most important area strategically to control in any game -- and take a bird's eye view. There is no question that all things being equal, the Democrats will utterly slaughter their opponents from one side of the nation, slashing and slicing, all the way to the other.

I am therefore amused at the Monday-night quarterbacking going on -- still -- as though with only a week left, the outcome of this upcoming election is still somehow debatable. Karl Rove -- aka Bush's colon -- might have his math, as he so arrogantly chirped recently, but the rest of the science-abiding world can still add and subtract, and it is quite obvious to anyone with the ability to dress themselves in the morning that there are simply not enough members of the hate constituency to deliver this election to the Republicans. There are not enough homophobes, bigots, and criminal braggarts left to offset the massive exodus of the recently awakened from the rotting base of the GOP.

The strategy played thus far by the RNC has been catastrophic, and all the talk of a Rove endgame surprise -- that is, a legal surprise -- is pure nonsense to anyone who understands strategy, as well as to anyone who knows that once you have lost control of the center, you are at a material disadvantage, and your opponent is positioned but a few moves from checkmate, there is absolutely nothing that can be done to salvage the game.

Then again, Rove has never been a strong chess player, or strategist even. His success comes simply from his willingness to act outside the law, an endless amount of money with which to do it, and connections that will keep him safe from legal prosecution. That is not genius, it is simply power crank. Because he is such a weak strategist, Rove tends to play the same game over and over and over. But his favored divide-aggravate-focus strategy is not working this time; it is simply far too visible, and the GOP is far too corrupt for even the most faith-based of their base.

So then why have I been in near panic for the last few weeks?

Because all things are not equal, or even barely Constitutional, and they have not been for some time now.

Distilling panic

Because I play chess, I can see that (a) the Republicans must hold the House to avoid impeachment, (b) yet because it is simply not probable that the GOP can hold the House, then (c) the game must be altered to favor the GOP in some way.

There is no question that the Republicans must keep the House, if they are to avoid criminal investigations which will no doubt land many of them in prison. More importantly, the unprecedented abuse of power by the White House cannot be allowed to be examined or investigated, because there is enough evidence to not only impeach this administration, but also to convict them of serious, criminal, even treasonous acts.

But that is not all that is at stake here, because of the unprecedented corruption, criminal activity, and outright violations of domestic and international law that include as bedfellows fascists and corporate interests. Halliburton, Exxon, and AT&T, for example, will no doubt face serious probes. Halliburton alone has been engaged in enough criminal activity to make the combined crimes of Enron, Arthur Andersen, and WorldCom look like standard operating procedure in comparison.

But how?

My friends, no matter how rough the road may be, we can and we will, never, never surrender to what is right. —Dan Quayle

Since the House must be kept under GOP control at all costs, thereby assuring a safe haven for the blue chip mob, how can such a miracle be pulled off in the face of simple math?

I am obviously not speaking from a position of direct knowledge when I present what I feel are logical scenarios. This is pure speculation on my part. That said, however, I am speculating as a person who studies history, as a chess player, and as someone who understands what is really at stake here.

The only way that Republicans can fix an election watched this closely and with so much focus on vote fraud allegations -- and with good reason -- against a party that excels in suppressing the vote, is for them to have three very important control mechanisms in place and operational: numbers, media and diversion.

It's all in the numbers

Karl Rove's recent deployment of a "question the polls" edict to his minions shows that the argument is already being planted by which to minimize the shock of an impossible GOP win. But that alone is not nearly enough when real math is to be Republicanized.

Have you ever wondered why it is that the GOP will go out of its way to falsely register Democratic voters as Republican voters? The most recent example of this bizarre activity occurred in Orange County, where 12 Republican operatives have tricked Democrats into registering as Republicans. What is the point of putting so much effort and money into wrongly registering people, when in the end, regardless of party affiliation, people vote in private for whomever they choose?


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: republicans, voting, election06, polling, karl rove

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Who wins will decide Rove's reputation
Posted by: edith on Nov 3, 2006 1:15 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Rove may not be brilliant but in his line of work the bottom line is whether your candidate and his supporters win. Rove is to date a superstar when it comes to results. His basic method is old fashioned machine politics honed in Democratic strongholds like Boston and New York: get your voters out and do what's necessary to inhiibit, if you can, the other guy's voters from coming out as much as your people.

We'll see if Rove's talent in scrounging up enough votes for a mediocre candidate has staying power on Nov. 7. There probably are enough conservative voters out there to keep Congress GOP; the question is whether Rove's minions can rouse conservatives fed up with Bush on immigration, civil liberties, big govt spending, Iraq, free trade and CEO incompetence.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Here ya go NWCrow - a few facts..... Posted by: Conservasaurus
» About your "facts" - Part 2 Posted by: NWCrow
» Whats life without a good Conspiracy! Posted by: Conservasaurus
odd
Posted by: rsaxto on Nov 3, 2006 3:17 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If something really odd occurs in the hours of vote counting and if the big media doesn't mention it or discounts it or denies it and if the House stays in Republican hands then we will know for sure that another election has been stolen and that American Democracy/Republic has been assassinated by the Bushies.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Polite disagreement
Posted by: profmarcus on Nov 3, 2006 3:35 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
i do believe rove to be a brilliant strategist, larisa, which is made all the more formidable BECAUSE he has embraced both evil and darkness as part of his repertoire... this dangerous and deadly combination is precisely why he remains a force to be reckoned with and why, as long as he occupies his seat of power, we must never let down our vigilance for one second...

if you scan the cast of characters in bushco, you find different types of evil... first, there is george, a case study in sock puppet evil... then there is dick cheney, dogged, persistent, plodding, darth vader-type evil... alberto gonzales exemplifies vapid, endless loop, record-stuck-in-a-groove, evil-with-an-avuncular-countenance evil... rumsfeld is your dotty, crochety, uncle who shoots b-b's at little kids for stepping on the grass evil... but karl is the prince, karl is the big enchilada, karl provides the horsepower... in short, karl is the quintessential energy source for the evil that powers the whole machine of evil represented by bush and his criminal gang... he's smart and he's completely unprincipled, the worst of a bad bunch, and, arguably, the most dangerous man in the world... he has single-handedly taken an already debased political dialogue in the u.s. and made it pure poison, corrosive to the touch, polarizing, calling forth the most vicious of primal instincts in many, and alienating anyone and everyone who has a shred of moral decency...

i won't rest until he is locked up, never to come within 100 miles of another public official or elected office holder...

And, yes, I DO take it personally

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Polite disagreement Posted by: yelsoma
It's an intervention, stupid!
Posted by: williameon on Nov 3, 2006 4:00 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Andrew Sullivan, the conservative writer who was once a key media supporter for the Iraq war, denounced the latest Bush statement on CNN on Wednesday night, stating that the president is so delusional, "This is not an election anymore, it's an intervention.

It's an intervention, stupid!

Fake Wars!
Fake Politicians!
Fake Diplomat’s!

Phony black boxes,
Flight suits and
Faux
Terrorist Attacks!

What is next?

More of the same!

Stolen elections
Backroom selections

THE GAME
Is
RIGGED!

The system is terrifyingly broken!

When
The Crooked Crooks
And
The Dirty Snooks!
Police
Themselves!

How can anything change?

To get these dirty VIRUSES out of the system!

We Must

Start over!

REBOOT!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Home of the Brave?
Posted by: shangrilalad on Nov 3, 2006 4:47 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
“But since when has fear ever stopped a revolution?”

I wish I shared your optimism about revolution if this proves to be another stolen election, but I don’t.

A majority of Americans are risk averse fence sitters who will only jump down on one side or the other when the issue is no longer in doubt. Like marathon runners who only join the race in the last hundred yards. Many millions of Americans are stone fascists who will kill their fellow Americans with pleasure, most are opportunists who will jump on the bandwagon irregardless of which direction in which it is heading, and a few are willing to risk their lives to regain democracy.

Who would lead this revolution? Not the Democrats in congress, they are more concerned with protecting plutocrats’ property, wealth and power. Plutocrats own this country, and they won’t allow anyone to threaten their property values.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Why Dems Fail
Posted by: albrechtkrausse on Nov 3, 2006 5:20 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
is for this reason. If you look at the successful campaign (esp the Clinton's) you'll see that they have hit-men (no I'm not talking Ron Brown or literally) but people dedicated to dig up dirt on people, lists of 'informaton' that can be used to keep people in line, and a tight organisation. Kerry's and the Dean's do not have this organisation and methods.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Why Dems Fail Posted by: albrechtkrausse
» RE: Why Dems Fail Posted by: rollo
"As a chess player?" Oh...right...
Posted by: Artaraxl on Nov 3, 2006 6:36 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Because I play chess, I can see that (a) the Republicans must hold the House to avoid impeachment,

You are clearly not a very strong player if you believe this. Frankly, as a chess player, I'm a little embaraced by your repeated invocations of this alleged skill, as if being a chess player somehow lends authority to your political arguments. It doesn't.

If you want to improve your game, you might start by joining the US Chess Federation and playing a bit more. At the moment no "Alexandrovna" found. A pseudonym? Or just a bunch of BS?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: "As a chess player?" Oh...right... Posted by: Conservasaurus
» Amen, shangriladad Posted by: cold2touch
» RE: "As a chess player?" Oh...right... Posted by: Conservasaurus
How Many Votes did this Article Lose for Democrats?
Posted by: David V on Nov 3, 2006 6:42 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Calling an election one week prior to November 7, as did this article in the opening paragraphs, could prove disastrous for Democrats and America.

How many voters will now stay home believing, "it's in the bag"? How many voters will resist the calls to Get Out the Vote because they think this election is a done deal?

You have done the Democratic Party a huge disservice with your article.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The October Surprise is a Secret, but only from the Voting Public.
Posted by: KeepsonTickn on Nov 3, 2006 7:36 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
All the Republicans need is an excuse.

I am now about to make an AMAZING PREDICTION. Please note that I said it first. Here is my AMAZING PREDICTION: Saddam Hussein will be convicted and sentenced to hang on Sunday, November 11th, just in time for the Sunday talk shows two days before the election. Imagine the surprise and suddenly galvanized interest of the media, when this totally unforseen turn of events occurs. Who could possibly have anticipated such news! (Unless they read the duly noted and buried announcement from the Iraqi trial court a couple of weeks ago.)

But of course, it wasn't news, because no one had any idea what the verdict might be, so there was not a single moment available on any of the hundreds of talk shows to speculate on what effects a guilty verdict might have on the election. And of course, the timing of this announcement could not possibly have been influenced by Bush Administration authorities in Iraq, because everyone knows that they have not one iota of influence on the quivering mass of Iraqi officialdom huddled behind American guns in the Green Zone.

So the media will suddenly be alive with nonstop coverage of this "shocking development," the pundits will announce that this is the REAL turning point in the war, the Republicans will have their excuse for nonsensical election results, and once again the American voters will get the purple finger.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Correction
Posted by: KeepsonTickn on Nov 3, 2006 7:40 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Correction to my AMAZING PREDICTION - That's Sunday, November 5th.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

turdblossom
Posted by: willymack on Nov 3, 2006 8:26 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It's quite simple, really; rove is an evil poopypants.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: turdblossom Posted by: babs
I'm confused and concerned
Posted by: charlief on Nov 3, 2006 8:49 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Ok, I admit to my eyes glazing over after reading most of the actual HR 5122 Bill, but I couldn't find the reference the author made to "federalizing the National Guard".

This bothers me for two reasons:
1. I tend to believe an author when referencing such a specific thing, and
2. Surely, such a law would be tantamount to sanctioning a Coup d'Etat whenever he needs to? Or in other words, High Treason, right?

If this is where we're heading, then we truly have a scary time ahead for all the opponents of this current regime.

If the author reads these comments, or if someone else has taken the time to read this Bill carefully [unlike me...], please advise me of where exactly, is this reference made in HR 5122?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: I'm confused and concerned Posted by: Rathan47
» RE: I'm confused and concerned Posted by: albrechtkrausse
» RE: I'm confused and concerned Posted by: wolfdaughter
» RE: I'm confused and concerned Posted by: albrechtkrausse
» confused and concerned Posted by: shangrilalad
stolen elections
Posted by: LeeAnnG on Nov 3, 2006 9:00 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I agree that there is a distinct possibility that the Democrats will "lose" this election and the Republicans will remain in power. There is just too much at stake for this administration. I also play chess, but I'm not at the status of being a "chess player." However, I am a poker player and have seen far too many situations where one player has the best hand all the way to the river and another player with nothing but a draw sucks out.

There are many ways to suck out, but there is one way to ensure it! Cheat! Unfortunately, it's the Republicans who are the dealers, and they have control of the cards. They can mark the cards before the game or deal from the bottom of the deck or they can combine techniques to ensure that one will work if it looks like they won't win any other way. Even four aces loses to a straight flush. And that might not even be evident until the very end. The Rove machine is capable of anything including lying, cheating, distracting, and fraud of all kinds.

I hope I'm wrong, but the Republicans pulling something out of their butts at the last minute is a nightmare scenario I can't get out of my mind. I hope a revolution (peaceful! NOTE ANY LURKING FASCISTS WHO MIGHT CONSIDER ME A TERRORIST SYMPATHIST! I SAID PEACEFUL! AND LEGAL!!) is in the making if a Republican victory occurs.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

If Republicans stay in power, all the government auditors will be fired
Posted by: thoughtcriminal on Nov 3, 2006 9:01 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The criminal element is running the country - Congress just fired the government auditor of Iraqi contracts. Halliburton, Bechtel and Parsons don't want to have to return any of their booty, apparently.

Republicans claim they have no idea how the language was inserted into the recent appropriations bill, and Democrats are pointing out it's obviously intended to prevent any investigations of fraud and corruption. Meanwhile, ABC, CNN, CBS, FOX and MSNBC are busy 'gauging the response' to John Kerry's humorless statements on Iraq. Covering Iraqi reconstruction contracts? - that would be 'in poor taste." Who needs Rove when you've got Katie Couric and Bill O'Reilly working for you?

Congress Tells Auditor in Iraq to Close Office, NYT 11-03-06

"The termination language was inserted into the bill by Congressional staff members working for Duncan Hunter, the California Republican who is the chairman of the House Armed Services Committee and who declared on Monday that he plans to run for president in 2008.

Mr. Holly, who is the House Armed Services spokesman as well as a member of Mr. Hunter’s staff, said that politics played no role and that there had been no direction from the administration or lobbying from the companies whose work in Iraq Mr. Bowen’s office has severely critiqued. Three of the companies that have been a particular focus of Mr. Bowen’s investigations, Halliburton, Parsons and Bechtel, said that they had made no effort to lobby against his office.

The idea, Mr. Holly said, was simply to return to a non-wartime footing in which inspectors general in the State Department, the Pentagon and elsewhere would investigate American programs overseas. The definite termination date was also seen as helpful for planning future oversight efforts from Bush administration agencies, he said.

But in Congress, particularly on the Democratic side of the aisle, there have long been accusations that agencies controlled by the Bush administration are not inclined to unearth their own shortcomings in the first place.

The criticism came to a head in a hearing a year ago, when Representative Dennis J. Kucinich, an Ohio Democrat, induced the Pentagon’s acting inspector general, Thomas Gimble, to concede that he had no agents deployed in Iraq, more than two years after the invasion."

Yes, there is a difference between most Democrats and most Republicans!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Brief, gratuitious Rove rant
Posted by: fifthworld on Nov 3, 2006 9:03 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This vile, vicious, venomous Mafia don is, underneath, nothing more than a bullied loser school-boy seeking revenge on the world for having had his fat ass towel-snapped one too many times in the locker room. I suppose the perpetratrors were liberals, too.

If you ever get to see this criminal have his day at the Hague, or wherever it might be, be sure that despite the poker face he's having an ulcer and totally shitting his pants. So expect him to be given a lot of lateral space.

Considering he's "Bush's brain", personally I'd prefer that he should be hanged by his prepubescent penis, now that torture is legal.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Further point
Posted by: charlief on Nov 3, 2006 9:09 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This is the actual Bill in PDF form should anyone feel so inclined. And by the way, the Bill's title is: "National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2007", and it's a Congressional Budget Office Cost Estimate, dated May 9, 2006.

Further confusion... is this author correct with her assertion of the President federalizing the National Guard or not??

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Further point Posted by: nitsed
» RE: Further point Posted by: watchbird
A Momentous Period
Posted by: MJanovic on Nov 3, 2006 9:11 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I share your fears and suspicions, Larisa. Thanks for a very provocative piece, the possibilities are horrifying. I have never seen a Presidency like this one in my entire-life as an American. However, I think we are seeing the desperation of an order that is dying and trying to buy more-time. But it makes this a very dangerous time, too, like when the Houses of the Hapsburgs, Hollenzollerns, and the Romanovs fell. It was a disaster that we're still experiencing the fallout of, but America has its own dynamic historically. It is possible America has to suffer a collapse just as Europe did in the last century.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: A Momentous Period Posted by: albrechtkrausse
» RE: A Momentous Period Posted by: babs
» RE: A Momentous Period Posted by: albrechtkrausse
» Stupid Is As Stupid Does Posted by: edith
maybe they will just steal it outright
Posted by: Klaxton on Nov 3, 2006 9:17 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The e-voting machines are easily hacked and it leaves no trace.

http://arstechnica.com/articles/culture/evoting.ars

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» No doubt Posted by: fifthworld
I, Too, Fear What Will Happen
Posted by: CyberKat on Nov 3, 2006 9:59 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
At this point I sense a desparation in the cadre at the top of the Republican party, and desparate, power-hungry people will do anything to hold onto that power.

I am also suspicious of the rush to pass the Military Commissions Act before the elections, so it can be used if things do not go their way. I fear an attack on the Eisenhower carrier group that will be blamed on Iran. Perhaps martial law will be declared and Bush will put a hold on any changing of the guard in "mid-crisis."

I am also suspicious that so many MSM hosts are suddenly interested in our faulty electronic voting system. Where were these people in 2004? Perhaps if there is an overwhelming Democratic win, Bush will simply say that we need a "do-over" and take years to resolve the chaos that ensues.

If there are any rebellions or merely demonstrations, Bush & Co. have all the tools they need to quell it quickly. Round up all the usual suspects, and lock them up in the Haliburton detention centers indefinitely.

I'm keeping my hopes high for this election, but my expectations very low. I heard that Vermont is thinking of seceding - perhaps I'll move there.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Brain
Posted by: fifthworld on Nov 3, 2006 11:10 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"Distorting the numbers, running smear campaigns, and creating diversions", etc., all take BRAIN(S?) ! A twisted one, but a brain.

Unfortunately some of these guys are quite brilliant, dare I say. Not to mention highly educated, at least within the degree-imparting system. All this, together with a proclivity for maniacal persistence and vindictiveness, all served up on a plate of denial, have made for the suspension or termination of democracy, whatever we had of it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Open minds, intelligence, and morals have nothing to do with
Posted by: Ellie1 on Nov 3, 2006 11:27 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Conservatives or Conservasaurus. Watch his posts on here,. he is a totally self serving, self obsessed individual who thinks he and only his ilk deserve the "fruits" of power. He is also typical repuke-a limited argument, citing only facts that he thinks support his arguments. Also he is an asshole.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» wow, my own topic..how cool! Posted by: Conservasaurus
Naughtystrodamus
Posted by: RayBanner on Nov 3, 2006 11:32 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Here's a bold prediction:

Another false flag terror attack on a few US cities.

Does it matter if it is before to rally the masses or after to provide the distraction?

No, it doesn't, you sad little clowns. Here's hoping you are among the survivors...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I'm with you Larissa
Posted by: Libby_Spencer on Nov 3, 2006 12:02 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Pass the tinfoil over here, I need a new hat - my old one is getting worn out. You've articulated my thoughts and fears perfectly Larissa. I've been wrapping the tinfoil around this theory since 04 and I'm popping tranqs like candy to overcome the near panic as the polls come in.

I fear we are all too correct in our thinking. But hey, if we're wrong, we can always use the tinfoil for the corn on the cob at the celebratory barbeque.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

How Much More Can We Take?
Posted by: sofla100 on Nov 3, 2006 12:55 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It is indeed said when the media focuses on some out of context Kerry statement (which was true by the way, the US Army will take anybody nowadays) and neglects Bushes wholesale carnage and disregard of the law. It is indeed sad when a President can break the law, as with illegal spying, and then have Congress "clean it up" for him by passing bills. It is indeed sad when a President can charge forward with a statement to the Dems of "so what is your plan for Iraq?" As if a drunk driver killling a bunch of people would then ask someone else how to clean up the mess. If we had some smart Dems, the correct response on this one by the way whould be "any plan but yours, since yours obviously isn't working so well." Our constiution has been shredded, rule of law flushed down the toilet, how much more can we take?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Repuglicans would kill to survive
Posted by: dmacauley on Nov 3, 2006 12:57 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I believe this quite literally. Not just kill foreign citizens or US soldiers ... they of course don't matter much.

But they would conspire to kill a candidate or dynamic leader or ordinary citizen if necessary. Point being: you better know the lengths they will go to in terms of duplicity, corruption, deception, treachery, treason and even terrorism to retain power.

They see elections as "auctions" and if the votes don't go to the highest bidder, they are willing to steal the show right out from under your noses.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

what if their plan is not to win, but to have a large number of 'undeterminable' races?
Posted by: kimyo on Nov 3, 2006 1:04 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
the cw is that we'll see a huge number of races 'mysteriously' go 51/49 for the republican candidate.

what if, especially in the most significant races, a combination of software/hardware glitches make it impossible to determine the winner?

what would happen then?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

History repeats itself
Posted by: monkeywrench on Nov 3, 2006 1:53 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
From tha article:

"The possibility of something sinister delivered as a diversion is not unthinkable, given this crowd and what they have already done. But how far would they be willing to go in order to retain power and thus avoid prosecution for crimes already committed?"

. . .We've already seen how far they're willing to go on 9/11. . .

Has anybody else noticed that the progression of repression with the Bush adminisration is nearly identical to the Fascists' plan for the systematic destruction of democracy in 1930's Germany? It is happening again, but, like then, apparantly very few people have noticed – or are willing to listen to what their subconcious is screaming at them. Just because you're paranoid doesn't mean they're not trying to get you. . .

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

A Rove Hit Piece
Posted by: Iconoclast421 on Nov 3, 2006 2:05 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
THE Rove hit piece!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Also Posted by: fifthworld
Democratic Senators please avoid plane flights until tuesday!
Posted by: jimlup on Nov 3, 2006 2:56 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Just odd that Carnahan and Wellstone were leading in close key elections. I have no evidence to back up my claim except a strong suspicion and a deep distrust of the republicans in charge. These people are the national version of the playground bully.

If I were a democratic senator I wouldn't fly until after tuesday!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

In 2009 Bush Could Still Be President
Posted by: sofla100 on Nov 3, 2006 4:28 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We cannot just dismiss a distinct possibility that Bush might claim a state of "war and continuous terrorist activity" as a pretext to remain in office past 2008. If the Repubs still have Congress this is a real possibility. Bush just won't leave and the Repubs in Congress will back him up retroactively. This now could be a big reason they want to hold Congress. I think the Dems should sweep at least the House next week, but remember flies could be in the pudding. The election machines are a complete debacle based on news reports and you know what that means. We could see wholesale drop offs of votes wherever the Dems are strong, in all the major cities. We have to wonder if this happens if the military and citizens will stand for it. But notice also, Bush won't fire Rumsfeld, as unbelievably bad as the guy is. So, he has his boy at the Pentagon to manage things. Be afraid, be very afraid.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new com